Kristen Stewart has been wearing Rob Pattinson’s old, dirty underwear: so gross?!

Last week, Kristen Stewart scored her first official role (in a film that will actually be made) since she got caught up in The Great Mini-Coopering Scandal of 2012. The film is called The Big Shoe, and as I said last week, it doesn’t sound like Kristen’s role is anything special. She’s basically playing “the girl” in a sort of weird black comedy, I think. Kristen’s costar (and the lead of the film) is Jim Sturgess, an actor I have occasionally referred to as “the Pillow-Weeper”. Sturgess is English, he’s attractive in that way that many English guys are attractive, and he gives off super-sensitive vibes. Like, he’s the guy who cries after sex. Thus, The Pillow Weeper. Now, Kristen has already shown that she has a type (if we’re just relying on Sparkles). So has Kristen found her jumpoff?

Kristen Stewart will soon be filming The Big Shoe with Hollywood hottie Jim Sturgess. Robsten fans may have a reason to be nervous — Jim possesses a lot of qualities that Kristen desires, and Robert Pattinson isn’t exactly a hundred percent sure he wants to reconcile with his Twilight co-star upon his return to the states.

A source close to Jim tells exclusively, “Jim was in town last week for pre-production meetings on his new movie with Kristen and they got along really well! Jim is super shy and unassuming, he’s actually a lot like Rob – really polite and he has the cutest British accent. It’s quite posh, just like Rob’s. Jim and Kristen have major chemistry, they really seem to click. They were talking up a storm about England and how bad the weather is there. They talked about their dogs and music. Jim is a really talented musician, so they connected on that a lot too.”

Don’t worry! Jim has a girlfriend – Mickey O’Brien, keyboardist for the band La Roux.

“There wasn’t any over the top flirting or anything, but Kristen was enjoying herself, she kept touching her hair and she was laughing a lot. Jim has a girlfriend and Kristen is back with Rob, so it’s totally professional between them right now,” our source adds.

Kristen seems really set on reconciling with Rob and working on their relationship for the long haul. Of course, it’s all in Rob’s hands. He’s filming The Rover in Australia and once he returns, he’ll make a decision as to whether or not he wants to continue a relationship with Kristen.

[From Hollywood Life]

Hmm. It sounds like Jim was being a pro and Kristen was trying to show him her scorched biscuit in between biting her lip seductively. TRAMPIRE!!!

As for poor Rob and the terrible Twihardy situation in which their great love cannot be fully realized because of time and space and infidelity and angst and armpits and Australia and Mini Coopers… what I keep hearing are reports of how Rob is over it and Kristen wants to stay with him but she’s starting to realize that they’re not going to make it through this year. So she’s pulling out all of the stops by compulsively wearing his dirty underwear.

Kristen Stewart apparently thinks the best way to win back Robert Pattinson’s heart is through his underwear! Yes, according to a friend, Kristen has been wearing Robert’s boxers since he left to film The Rover in Australia and told her not to visit.

“Kristen is beside herself over Rob’s decision to step back from their relationship and has started wearing his old undies every day,” says the friend.

Ron is having a hard time getting over Kristen’s affair with Rupert Sanders, but she’s been bombarding Rob with texts and calls. The insider says Rob freaked out when Kristen tearfully told him about wearing his drawers.

“He thought it was creepy… Kristen’s clinginess has been a problem, and this is just a step too far.”

[From Star Magazine, print edition]

Gross. Just… gross. I can’t even think of a reasonable explanation for wearing Rob’s dirty underwear. That’s just disgusting. And before you throw shade… remember, this is the girl who admitted in an interview that Rob loves to lick her armpits. They are just a gross couple and I wouldn’t doubt this for a second.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

109 Responses to “Kristen Stewart has been wearing Rob Pattinson’s old, dirty underwear: so gross?!”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Rhea says:

    Gah!!! This is way too early in the morning to get stuck with the image. Yuck!!! I don’t even care if the story is BS or not. I just want the image gone from my brain ASAP!

  2. Amelia says:

    I admit to pulling on a pair of my bf’s boxers in the morning if I have to get out of bed and answer the phone.
    But wearing *dirty* pants that belong to *someone else* throughout the day?
    No. Just no.
    But it’s Star, so I suppose a hefty grain of salt is required here.

  3. marie says:

    wait, wait, wait.. is it Rob or Ron, I mean Rob might get mad that she’s wearing Ron’s undies..

  4. c'est la vie says:

    Yay – thank you!
    I wondered if you were going to cover this.

    And of course she’s wearing his old undies.
    She always wears his clothes. Why would she stop now. Much less,
    purchase her own underwear? It’s not like she can afford it.

    And when they have their big reunion – well, let the dirty underwear and
    armpit licking commence! I’m guessing she doesn’t wear deodorant either,
    to help with the armpit licking.

    BS aside – seriously, he can do better.
    I think almost anyone could do better than her. Except for James Franco.

  5. CTgirl says:

    At first I spit my coffee out when I read this. However, it makes sense based on her everyday clothing style of hobo emo stank-ass chic. If she won’t wash her hair, which is visible to the world, you know that she isn’t washing her one black bra and the undies she took from Rob’s laundry pile over in the corner.

  6. mia girl says:

    Since that KStew interview took place at the tail end of her Snow White adventures, I think there is still some debate as to which “boyfriend” was actually doing the armpit licking.

  7. Lulu says:

    I love her eye makeup in the second photo.

    I don’t know that I believe she is wearing is DIRTY underwear. But who knows? *sigh*

  8. Eleonor says:

    You know what? I think this has happened maybe once, she was in hurry and wore the first underwear she found. Then she thought “wow this could be a story that makes me a real badass!” So she has changed it a little bit et voilà.

  9. lassie says:

    Is ‘armpit’ an euphemism for the bathing suit area that I’m just too uncool to know about?

  10. T.C. says:

    I don’t think Kstew is the clingy one in the relationship so not buying the star story. I completely buy that she’s looking for a jumpoff and Jim might be it.

  11. Mia 4S says:

    I don’t get it, are the tabloids trying to make her look pathetic because that’s the sellable image, are those who hate her trying to make her look pathetic, or are her people planting these stories to make her look pathetic so we will feel sorry for her? Whichever it is, awful! Oh and so her task is to sit around and wait until he gets back and decides if there’s a relationship? Well there’s a good example for young girls! Again, pathetic.

  12. TXCinderella says:

    Bunny teeth is just nasty and she better stay away from Jim Sturgess. He’s mine!

  13. lady mary. says:

    Well if She is wearing “his” then He must be wearing “hers”,that would explain a lot

  14. allons-y alonso says:

    I think i just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

  15. Katie says:

    Ok I really don’t like her but even she deserves enough privacy to not have that nasty little piece of info floating around of only because the rest of us are now scarred for life from that image! Gag. Barf.

    • c'est la vie says:

      No, she doesn’t deserve it – she blew her public image to hell and back with what she does – and gets bad pr as fallout.

      I like to play a game called “if Anne Hathaway did that” with Kristen Stewart.

      Just substitute Anne Hathaway’s name (or whoever you want) for Kristen Stewart’s.

      As in -
      Anne Hathaway was caught smoking a big bowl of ganja on her front step, while her first big movie was out.

      Anne Hathaway gave the finger to blah blah blah, everyone, and Charlize Theron.

      Anne Hathaway was caught screaming and fighting with her personal trainer.

      Anne Hathaway likes to have her armpits licked.

      Anne Hathaway cheated (in a minicooper) on her partner with her director, a married father of two.

      Anne Hathaway then made a big public apology that landed in People, to said partner. She had to – because her affair was caught on camera.

      Anne Hathaway’s romance with partner then ended.

      You see where this is going – it looks bad, indeed very bad for Anne Hathaway’s future. And future press coverage. Anne Hathaway would be a very large, national joke. And she wouldn’t be definitely wouldn’t be up for the part of Fantine.

      Kristen Stewart did this to herself. She set herself up. She didn’t need any help to get where she is today…

      • Michele says:

        c’est la vie:

        You know so very, very much about Kristen. You must follow her career and personal life very, very closely. For a second, I almost mistook you for a fan.

        I guess it’s true when they say there’s a very fine line between love and hate.

      • Zelda Fitzgerald says:

        Michele -

        All of those points were WIDELY covered by the tabloids over the past 6 months. You would just need to casually follow any random gossip blog to glean that information as Robsten has been constantly in the news since Mini-Cooper Gate.

        No need for the attitude.

      • another nina says:

        One point – Anne was indeed caught doing drugs in college, and her publicist bought out all photo evidence to let her have a clean start. I think she even mentioned it in a interview plus there were plenty of blind items. Anne is no saint. But she is much more talented and interesting than Ms Stew.

    • c'est la vie says:

      It is sort of disgusting though – dirty drawers.

      Ick. I’m not sure if that or armpit licking is worse.

    • c'est la vie says:

      Thank you Zelda.

      And yes as you pointed out – you can google all of this and the images too. Well known stuff by now.

      I don’t hate her, Michele – I just think she is spoiled and stupid. No class either. She offends my eyes.

      Though you clearly love her enough to follow her every move? On twitter? What’s up with that?
      And please don’t answer – that’s a rhetorical question.

      • Michele says:

        “She offends my eyes.”

        Well, if you didn’t follow her every move as closely as you do, your eyes would be fine!

        Seriously, if she is THAT offensive to you…avoid any mention of her. Easy peasy.

      • c'est la vie says:

        What was it about rhetorical you didn’t understand?

        Or hypocritical? Since you accused me of following her life around? I believe you follow tweets.

        Yes, she offends me. ROFL All the time. Because she’s offensive. I don’t even think I need to write insert sarcasm here at this point…

      • Zelda Fitzgerald says:

        I’m pretty sure the point of this blog is to follow and generally snark on celebrities, especially the annoying ones. It’s not a fan site. It’s a bit juvenile to call out posters for posting unfavorable opinions about stars you obviously obsessively stan for.

        And following Kristen’s mother on Twitter? There are no words.

      • c'est la vie says:

        Good points Zelda, thanks again. I don’t need to love her to post about her – not on Celebitchy, correct?

        Or anywhere else for that matter.

        Snap. I better go delete my post about Wills and Kate too.

        I don’t think so.

    • c'est la vie says:

      Well, you could choose another name then.

      Natalie Portman?
      Emma Watson?
      Emma Stone?

      None of them are saints either I’m sure BUT – the game still works.

    • Bijlee says:

      I agree. Not everything about her Ned’s to be trashed or whatever. Those are private things…gross things, but private.

  16. Tig says:

    I feel so smug right now- I predicted the “wearing of his underwear” plant- exc that I had her wearing it on her head-LOL!!

    Seriously, now the plants are she’s NOT going to Oz- I saw this headline and thought- why PR for something you aren’t doing??? Is her PR team that desperate?

    Jim Sturgess was fine in Across the Universe, awful in One Day. Seriously, sounds like he has a real-life rocker chix GF- wonder how the “sparks are flying” plants are sitting with her?

    Stay in Oz Rob!

    • Michele says:

      How could anyone believe her team would plant a ridiculous story like that to …The Star?! What would Kristen gain from it? Absolutely nothing.

      Rob is away filming in the outback. Kristen has been chilling with her friends. She went to the Ellie Goulding concert and Taylor Lautner’s bowling b-day party last Saturday. Her mother tweeted she had a lasagna cooking contest with Kristen last weekend. Basically, she’s been doing normal stuff that average girls her age do…concerts, bowling, cooking with mom. Pretty boring stuff for tabloid reporting, though.

      The tabloids know they make money from magazine sales and the gossip sites know they will get more hits with Kristen and/or Rob’s name in the title. So they make up these ridiculous stories that have no basis of truth to them. There are no “sources” feeding them the stories. Rob and Kristen’s friends are not selling them out. Slow news day = let’s make up some juicy stories.

      Last week, depending on which tabloid you bought into, there were wedding plans for Rob & Kris headlines along with stories that claimed they broke up before the GG awards even though she was with him at Tina Fey’s GG private afterparty. Obviously, they’re not doing both simultaneously.

      Another thing, their friends are not running to The Star, Radar, Hollywood Life, National Enquirer, etc selling their “Rob and Kristen” stories. They have a tight knit group of friends who they hang out with all the time who aren’t using them for money or fame making purposes.

    • c'est la vie says:

      LOL – wearing it on her head. Priceless.

  17. Get a clue says:

    I have no trouble believing she wears his dirty underwear. She is skanky.

  18. another nina says:

    Now I have to assume that Patts wears strings on a daily basis ’cause I can’t understand how she fits his probably size L boxers in her jeans, which are always 2 sizes small…

  19. Micki says:

    If she jumps Sturgess she’ll have a new set of old durty underwear to wear every other day.

  20. MonicaQ says:

    “wearing his old undies” <– am I the only one that thought, you know, boxers that Rob doesn't wear anymore? So they're "clean", they're just "old" e.g. ratty and he doesn't use them. I can't wear my husband's because they're too big but I have a few men's ones from Wal-Mart as sleeping shorts. Ain't gotta look cute while sleeping XD

  21. HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!! Oh I so hope this is true.
    I don’t believe she’s wearing Rob’s dirty underwear. Who has the proof? I don’t think Rob would go around telling his friends that his GF wears his dirty boxers even if she did.
    This is just a lame gossip. Not gonna believe a word.

  22. sunnyinseattle says:

    I love the line, “Don’t worry, Jim has a girlfriend!”, Phew, that’ll stop her! ;-)

  23. Dee Cee says:

    Too cute and relatively harmless romantic comic young fools in love twists and drama gambling; creative measures of proving your devotion.. for winning him over in the race for time, this year only.. in all or nothing spree story.. Really, is no man safe from her powerful womanly-vixen charms now?

  24. Aud says:

    Even the Internet’s famous Grumpy Cat Tardar Sauce has more facial expressions than her…

  25. delia says:

    Not to defend BoxPits, (my new name for them), but the article said “old undies”. I read that literally, as in he has old, but clean, worn out, should already be thrown away boxers, that some men insist on keeping. For wealthy people like them, dirty clothes are dropped on the floor, picked up by maids and laundered by staff asap. If they actually keep piles of dirty laundry in their mansions, then they are both beyond deranged. (Possible.)

    What I find truly ridiculous are these constant “working on their relationship” stories. They met when very young and worked and lived throughout their entire relationship within the fantasy bubble of a film set franchise. Then the franchise ended and they grew up. “Work” is for older, peasanty couples who are trying to preserve a marriage/ltr, parent kids, maintain social/financial stability, etc. and it often fails even then. If you’re in your early 20′s, childless, rich, free, with almost unlimited options/temptations and constant traveling that always keeps you apart, just shake hands, part friends and have fun. It’s over, BoxPits. Let it go.

    • Anname says:

      So that Bonnie Tyler song popped into my head after reading your comment, old one but still able to annoyingly stick in my head-

      What about love
      Don’t you want someone to care about you, What about love, Don’t let it slip away…

      Maybe they continue to work on their relationship beecause even though they are childess and in their 20s, they want to make it work – maybe they actually love each other?

  26. Original A says:

    You really believe this? It makes no sense. I read that the he was in Australia for a total of five weeks. Do you really think he jetted off leaving a ton of dirty underwear? And…if she, Sturgess, and Banks are in the movie together…I doubt a meeting would include just her and Sturgess. I know KStew is all 666 and everything to most of you so all negative stories must be true and she must plant them all (even if the stories are not remotely flattering), but these are a real stretch. Sturgess has a gf, so I’m pretty sure she realizes he’d make a crappy jump off…If for no other reason, because of her public image…which would benefit from no jump off or a jump off who hadn’t been in a relationship for a while.

    Also, I can’t be the only one rolling my eyes at the tabloid narrative of “Kristen can’t take a hint”. Even though I highly doubt they were ever in a monogamous relationship in the first place, that (probably false) narrative doesn’t leave me with (gasp) the best impression of RPattz. If you are in your late 20s and can’t find the guts to just say “Hey, I tried…but this just isn’t working and that is final. Give me a few months and maybe we can try and be friends”…then you don’t have any business being in a serious adult relationship. I think she was too young and immature to be in that kind of (if they had a serious) relationship in the first place, tbh. oh well. Regardless of what their relationship actually consists of and their current status, I doubt anything will happen until at least a few months after the DVDs are released in an attempt to avoid even more of a mess. Interesting that most of the more popular tabloids are over them except for little blips like this…Reminds me in a sense of Efron
    and Hudgens.
    except for little

    • c'est la vie says:

      Weren’t they living together before?
      Sounds semi-monogamous to me.

      Ya think?

      And I don’t think she’s very 666 – she’s just an a–hole.

      Who gets caught on camera, often acting like a yes, a–hole.

      • Original A says:

        Um, I think regardless of whether or not you think she’s an asshole…the idea of him leaving behind a month’s worth of dirty underwear is absurd…or the idea of meeting with only one actor when you are in an ensemble cast. Some tabloid stories sound semi believable…these don’t at all in my opinion.

        Also, you’ve never met any poly people then…Some are married and have kids…poly people have the same kind of relationships, they are just not monogamous. There were a lot of weird things about their relationship before the scandal, so I don’t find it out of the realm that they were/are in an
        open relationship.

      • Original A says:

        Misunderstood…You put a question
        mark after weren’t they living together before and I skimmed and missed the semi part….so I assumed u meant monogamous. Reading on the I phone:).

        Eh. Didn’t pick up on Kaiser’s overall sarcasm…I thought she and a few others actually bought this. No commenting without coffee for me in the morning :) The 666 comment was in reference to some poster on here that I’ve seen in the past who thinks KStew is abusive. The stans of all stripes are ridic…the ones who are puppies and rainbows and true love, and the ones like I mentioned who think RPattz is a princess in a tower of sorts.

    • Another Ann says:

      Star Magazine, people. Star Magazine.

      Lainey even has a post today (A GMD story) that affirms that Star is among the bottom feeders in the tabloid hierarchy. They have some good fiction writers (who probably laugh their asses off as they make this crap up) who post on the celebs that generate the most interest and hits.

      Even if the premise was true (that she was wearing his underwear), how on earth would Star know about it? And if a “friend” was feeding them this tidbit, it would be pretty easy for Stewart to figure out the culprit and cut off their access, wouldn’t it?

      I laughed when I read the story. The thing that scares me is that some people here seem to believe it.

      • c'est la vie says:

        Like who?

        I think we’re all just amused that someone bothered to come out with this bs. That and the fact that she does have a habit of wearing his dirty clothes.

        And @Original A – I didn’t think I’d have to explain this, but why not.
        Semi-monogamous means – not monogamous.

  27. Commenter says:

    Who cares if she wears his “dirty” old undies. I’m sure she washes them before wearing them, cause seriously… is she really that gross to wear unwashed undies? No. As for Rob licking her pits, that’s so not gross either. Shit, there are things my husband and I do to each other because we can, but it’s not gross; we just enjoy loving each other.

  28. Tig says:

    Stuff keeps getting planted bec it keeps her name out there -ever heard of bad pub is better than no pub? C’mon – if a tab was making up stuff- and of course they do- it would be more over the top than her “wearing his underwear”- how lame is that? But it fits right in the narrative of her getting papped wearing his clothes, hats, etc- just like on the side of the road back in the summer. Of course, the latter was a bit of a “mistake”.

    • Anname says:

      I do not believe anyone is planting these stories, they are ridiculous.

    • Another Ann says:

      Bad pub is NOT better than no pub. Anyone who is remotely competent in the field of marketing/PR will refute that crazy notion.

      Do you think the publicity about the Carnival cruise from hell is going to be better than no publicity for Carnival? Think again. How about the crazy senators who got all the publicity for making the pregnancy/”real rape” comments and then got voted out of office – was the bad publicity better than none?

      The fact is, a lot of what a PR rep does is clean up any bad publicity. Bad publicity is a celeb’s worst nightmare, not their friend.

  29. Hmmm says:

    Most amusingly written. It didn’t even need the gross story about the undies.

  30. KellyinSeattle says:

    Everything she does is so gross.

  31. KellyinSeattle says:

    She is so unattractive in so many ways!

  32. amalie says:

    i’m confused. aren’t jim sturgess and rob good friends?

  33. Dana says:

    My dance instructor, who has a website to present the dancing school, told me she gets 2 – 5 emails per month from strangers that ask her to send old dancing shoes and dirty underwear to them.
    Maybe there are quite a lot of people who are into that stuff???

  34. jenn says:

    She looks like Skrillex in that last photo!

  35. Lotta says:

    So what, I’ve worn my hubbies old underwear too, after they came back from the laundry ofcourse.
    And about the licking of armpits, I licked more intimate parts then that and so has my husband. Is that weird? What do other couples do, a kiss on the cheek and that’s it?
    I must be a real pervert then.

  36. Lexie says:

    so here i am, in front of my laptop, putting off writing a paper for college, reading celebitchy instead. sooo i checked out some of the earliest posts on k-stew (up next: watching bad tv, because the paper is not due for two more days and procrastination runs deep in my blood) and tee-hee…it was sooo funny to see how much (mostly) everyone loved her back then (and thought she could act)…

  37. Chrissy says:

    She always looks greasy and dirty when she’s not done up for a red carpet (and occasionally on a red carpet). I can buy this because she just seems like kind of a weird girl who isn’t very clean. Look at her hair in that last picture!

  38. von says:

    Kate Bosworth went after Jim Sturgess while filming 21. He wasn’t interested – he was with Mickey then – he still is. If KStew tries to hit that – we know a girlfriend won’t stop her if a wife and kids didn’t – he’ll turn her down flat. Jim Sturgess has too much class and talent to go there.

    • aquarius64 says:

      That’s the thing….Kristen can’t afford another cheating scandal. Because her blatant act of creulty and stupidity in July 2012 any man she works with on a movie is a potential. That trampire stamp is indelibly inked on her. Even with stories about her going to a social event, like Taylor Lautner’s birthday party, it’s been alleged that Patrick Schrawtzenegger (sp) pushed up on her. The jists of the stories are Kristen is targeting guys like a succubus despite of the relationship status of the intended victim; or guys approach her because they think she’ll play despite the fact she’s back with Rob. Unfortunately for Kristen, 50+ pictures of the Mini-Cooper Makeout give the gossip press the power to run with such stories because of a proven fact. Even when the story is codified with Kristen was professional or turned down the guy’s advances, it still shows her reputation is still badly damaged . The Kristen-is-a-trampire storyline guarantees hits, which equals money, so they are not going to back off on this theme. Her fans may complain about re-running the scandal, but they apparently do not have enough muscle to hurt a blog’s or magazine’s bottom line; otherwise they would stop reprinting the story.

  39. cruiz2 says:

    Are her two front teeth capped or are they still growing? yikes!!!

  40. Lucrezia says:

    She’d have a waist size of what, maybe 26 inches? He’d be 32/34? She’s not hugely hippy, so there’s no way his underwear would stay on her.

    Therefore, I’m forced to conclude that she is wearing his underwear on her head.

  41. Delilah says:

    Hey…Rupert’s English too. Speaking of types, Sturgess’s woman is a brunette with piercing eyes like Kristen…

  42. lisa2 says:

    I don’t believe this story. I’m not a Kristen fan or hater. I could take or leave her. I just don’t believe this story. I think they try to write gross stories about certain celebs to feed the hate.

    Who wears dirty underwear. I get a Tshirt.. I wear my boyfriends when he is out of town. I like having that scent, but underwear.. really that is just dumb.

  43. B says:

    She is unattractive beyond words. Her personality is repulsive as well. Atleast if she could act, it would be something. I honestly cannot find one redeeming quality about her.

  44. Scavenger says:

    Really? You believe this. Where is the information that the boxers were unwashed coming from? Lots of girls will wear their boyfriends boxers; they are very comfortable, and I dont think that’s weird or disgusting at all. I simply don’t believe she is wearing his unwashed boxers.