Brad Pitt says life before fatherhood was ‘a dead end’


Brad Pitt sat down for a lengthy interview with the Los Angeles Times to promote The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, and he’s still talking about Angelina and their family, aging, politics and New Orleans. Honestly, I didn’t realize that the film carried on to 2005, I thought it was just a straight-up period piece only going as far as the immediate post-WWII years. Apparently, it goes up to Hurricane Katrina.

“Once you hit 40, you start reexamining the math of it all,” says the actor, who turned 45 on Dec. 18. So far, he indicates, the pluses and minuses are adding up just fine. “I’ll trade wisdom for youth any day,” Pitt says.

That existential swap lies at the heart of David Fincher’s film, loosely adapted by screenwriter Eric Roth from a whimsical 1922 short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald. Brought into the world on Armistice Day, 1918, as a slack-skinned, 80-year-old man, Benjamin bears witness to many of the century’s epochal events, while the film leapfrogs from New Orleans to Murmansk to New York to the Ganges. Finally he and the film come home to rest in the Crescent City just as Hurricane Katrina is about to strike.

But none of Benjamin’s picaresque adventures or brief encounters shapes him more than his passionate, odds-defying relationship with Daisy Fuller (Cate Blanchett), a ballerina who meets Benjamin when she’s still a child. Although the pair’s prime years overlap oh-so-fleetingly, their souls merge in a lasting union. The bittersweet irony of their predicament raises the question of whether “Benjamin Button” is, in the end, a tragedy.

In some ways, “Benjamin Button” plays as an elegy for New Orleans and for a lost (or rapidly vanishing) part of what culture critic Greil Marcus called “the Old, Weird America.” Personally, Pitt says, he won’t be sorry to see the current White House administration exiting stage left. But he thinks it would be premature to start writing a national obit.

“America’s known for our ingenuity,” he says. “We put a man on the moon, for Christ’s sake. And it’d be a shame to lose that definition because of some kind of fear of losing what we were, or what we had. That’s the quickest way, I think, to end it all. We’re going to be all right.”

Because it spans the character’s entire life, “Benjamin Button” inadvertently serves as a showcase for Pitt’s various cinematic personas. At one point in the movie, he evokes Jack London’s Sea Wolf as a craggy sailor of fortune. Later in the film, when Benjamin reaches his prime, Pitt brings to mind James Dean on a motorcycle, or John F. Kennedy on his sailboat, navigating the swells of destiny.

“It’s a tragedy in the sense that any love involves loss, and that’s the risk you take,” Pitt responds. “And the greater the love, the greater the loss. I certainly feel that now with the woman I’m with, and the children that I have. But whatever the course may be, this time together is extraordinary.”

[From LA Times]

I really like that line – “The greater the love, the greater the loss.” It’s a little Oprah-y, but it communicates volumes beyond the normal public relations shenanigans. Brad talks more about Angelina and his acting process. The most ZOMG moment comes when he refers to his life before Angelina as a “dead end,” although I don’t care for the way the LA Times guy refers to Brad’s children – separating them between “their own” and “adopted”. My feeling is that the best, most politically correct way to refer to these (or any) children is biological and adopted, not “their own”.

As everyone but a handful of Himalayan monks doubtless knows, the woman who sleeps by Pitt’s side these days is Angelina Jolie, with whom he shares parenting duties for six children (three of their own, three adopted). During an interview of an hour’s duration, Pitt refers repeatedly to his satisfying home life and the way it has refashioned his priorities.

“I had a whole other life and I got to experience a lot. And I probably got away with more than I should,” he says. “And it kind of ran its course, you know, it kind of hit a dead end.” Fatherhood, he notes, is “the direction I always thought I would go in. But not until, with Angie and it felt like a natural evolution, a natural direction.”

Pitt agrees that, as he has matured professionally, “I don’t have to grope as much for the character. I can get there quicker, so it’s not as much trial and error,” he says. “Also, as I get older, more experiences, I’m more fine-tuned in what I’m after, what I think speaks in the piece. And lastly I want to hurry and get home to my kids.”

[From LA Times]

David Fincher, the director of Benjamin Button, is also quoted in the piece. He talks more about how Brad’s acting process has changed, and comes close to saying that Brad’s a better actor now then when they first met, some-odd 14 years ago. Personally, I agree. I always that Brad was rather “pretty but dumb,” but his personal and professional choices the past few years have really impressed me. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is getting great reviews, with a lot of people singling out Brad’s performance, and he’s an early favorite for an Best Actor Oscar nomination. Benjamin Button is in theatres now.

[Thanks to Daisy242 for the heads up on the LA Times piece!]

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are shown at the premiere of The Case of Benjamin Button on 12/8/08. Credit: WENN

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

177 Responses to “Brad Pitt says life before fatherhood was ‘a dead end’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Wif says:

    I don’t normally weigh in on the whole AJ vs. JA thing, because I like and dislike aspects of both of them, but if I were JA I would be crushed by him saying that life, during the time of my marriage, was a “dead end”.

  2. geronimo says:

    I think people will read into the ‘dead end’ bit what they want. To me, it seems very personal and very much about himself, and the shallowness of the Hollywood life he was leading and the lack of direction it had. If the comparison between the quality of life he had before AJ and the life he’s living now comes across as unkind and/or thoughtless, too bad. He’s entitled to talk about it, and be happy about it.

  3. Jenna says:

    I just wish he would shave that horrible thing above his lip.

  4. Judy says:

    I dont think everything he says about his life is about his marriage to Jen for cripes sake. He has moved on without her. It was a done deal before he even left her. To him not having children meant a dead end. This just says he felt very strongly about having children one way or the other.
    I guess maybe AJ is the love of his life and she gave him the children he wanted and he feels that his life before was a dead end and maybe it was..
    To be honest I doubt if he even thinks about his ex wife ,it is the rest of the people who keep dragging her into his new life. I dont know why people just cant stop with the POOR JEN crap.

  5. Bellatrix says:

    I strangely believe that Brad Pitt would have felt the immense beauty of being a father had he had children with Jolie or any other woman.

    He seems to enjoy fatherhood. That includes the way things happened: him falling in love with Jolie and deciding to adopt Maddox and Zahara too at first. The rest is celebrity magazine history…

    Why do people always want to blame a particular person? Sometimes a life change coincides with a change of partner. Same particular views on how to live and shared interest and desires at that precise moment are definitely very stimulating.

    Good for him. There are, fortunately, many other men who are this happy and ecstatic about being a parent in the normal world.

  6. Orangejulius says:

    Me too, Jenna, on dumping the facial hair. Those things are horrible to kiss.

  7. Rosanna says:

    I think Brad is a great person. There’s no other way to rebuff JA’s rants than to put her down “without putting her down” (read: “the direction I always thought I would go in. But not until, with Angie and it felt like a natural evolution, a natural direction.” — that is to say, it was him who didn’t want kids, not JA).

  8. kelly says:

    Maybe if the BrAnJen trio would all just keep quiet about their personal lives and stick to pitching their movies — sans existentialist comments on life and love and marriage, either past or future — we could all get back to giving them the weight they deserve, which is actually very little. In the grand scheme of things, philosophy from someone famous only for his ability to look good and deliver lines in a reasonably comprehensible manner should be of no more import than what the temperature was yesterday.

  9. KLaw says:

    That last photo of Brad is so old-Hollywood. It reminds me of Errol Flynn. *swoon*

  10. Wif says:

    But that’s my point Rosanna, he is saying that Ange is his great love and he didn’t feel enough about Aniston to have kids with her. And I’m not saying he shouldn’t say it, and I’m not saying that he shouldn’t have dumped Aniston or am having a pity party for her or anything. I’m just saying that if my ex said that about me, knowing that millions of people would read it, it would deal a serious blow to my ego. (But maybe the super famous/rich/beautiful feel differently, I don’t know.)

  11. Trace says:

    He is looking back in his life and giving a subtle, philosophical, yet revealing answer. The whole Hollywood life he was leading being one half of the “golden” couple with Aniston was a DEAD END. He was in a loveless marriage with his ex-wife and didn’t want to have children with her. He sounds like he’s much happier now and definitely in a better place.

  12. Enonymous says:

    kelly well said, I agree.

  13. truth-SF says:

    This article says to me that you shouldn’t be with someone just because you look good and ppl want you to be together. You should follow your heart no matter what anyone else says or feels because the bottom line is, at the end of the road, “IT IS YOUR LIFE, NOT THEIRS.” And the choices you make should reflect who you are and what makes you happy. And everyone else should worry about theirs.

  14. Ned says:

    It sound like it’s Angelina calling the shots and making him make these statements.

    This is in response to the “uncool” remark toward Angelina endlessly talking about how much Brad loves her and her children.

    People started talking about how much for 2 years Angelina is talking about HIS FEELINGS and how he sees her, but never hear Brad.

    Now he is going to futher alienate himself from women all over the world.
    Women who were already disliking what he did.

    He must be really stupid to make this statement that comes across as disrespectful toward years of marriage and making him look- not only like a passive, insincere and a cheater – but also- very stupid for saying that and distansing even further a potential audience.

    Given his past box-office failings- he should really get a smarter woman telling him what to do.

  15. Ned says:

    Angelina has to be stupid to think that this might help her broken image.

    Since she already done that to Billy Bob’s fiance, we know that it really has nothing to do with what was the state of the marriage.

    While Angelina seems pathetic to try and excuse her going after a married man, Brad seems flat out stupid for trying to diminish such a long relationship of almost a decade of his life.

    We all know he is not a smart guy, but damaging his image even further, is surprising even when applying very low standards.

  16. Baholicious says:

    Mm hm. This master of tact also said in another article I read that Mr. & Mrs. Smith stands out as his favourite film for him because “that’s where (I) fell in love.”

    I think all this “dead end” etc. talk is deliberately aimed at Aniston to put her in her place and tell her to keep her yap shut. I’m sure he could go into much great detail if need be and I think at this point he’d have no problem going ‘there.’

  17. HallieB says:

    Ned, you have fallen headlong into the sewer filled trap of believing gossip. Brad is a very smart man, has thrived in celeb land now going on 20 years. He does not need Angelina or anyone else to put words in his mouth, he is saying exactly what he wants to say, and that is that he totally loves Angelina, totally loves being a dad, wanted kids with Angelina and no one else. Brad has said the same thing now in RStone and on the Charie Rose show last nite. If he was so concerned about any box office he would be silent according to the way you think. Brad is telling us how he actually feels and I see nothing wrong with that as it is his right to do so.

    Just accept that Brad is very much in love and happy with Angelina and their family, they are his #1 priority, not anything or anyone else.

    Brad’s own words indicate that he was not happy with Jen, saying it was a deadend life. That is how he feels, his truth, no made up PR.

    ned just because you have a fantasy about the lives of others does not make that fantasy the truth.

  18. pj says:

    Way to much thought given to the Jolie-Pitt and Aniston “triangle”. The interview is Brad talking and reflecting on his life and family. Editing his thoughts and words to get back at the ex, no way. Each person involved has every right to say what they want about their lives. It is just that Brad and Angie are talking about the present and Jen is talking about the past.

  19. Robin says:

    Well ned, your comments are rediculous.
    Brad is doing what people in love do, talk about the people they care about. Yes he is gushing but so do all others. BTW, he was with Jen for 6+ years, not any 10 years. Really it does not take much to be accurate, and in truth Brad will soon have been with Angelina for as long as he was married to Jen. There are enduring bonds between a man and the mother of his kids, no mattter what. Angelina will always be a part of Brad’s life. Jen is no longer a part of Brad’s life and I do not see why you act as if she is, he owes her nothing at this point the way she has disrespected the mother of his much loved kids. The past is the past and is over, done. Brad never ever even utters Jen’s name, she is severed from his life.

  20. Ned says:

    It’s been 2.5 years of Brangelina- and until now it was Angelina endlessly talking about how much Brad loives her, loves her body etc.

    Brad never said a word neither about his past marriage not about his love for Angelina.

    So after Oprah tried to push him to talk about how he feels about Angelina, and after the “uncool” remark- Angelina has used Brad AGAIN as her surrogate.

    Everybody has noted that it is only Angelina doing the talkning about how Brad feels- so now she is using Brad to try and hurt Jennifer and get back at her remark and prove everyone that it’s not only her doing the talking about his feelings.

  21. HallieB says:

    pj, thank you. ITAWU. All any of us have is the now, and that is what is important.

  22. Cheyenne says:

    LOL! I very much doubt Brad Pitt would let anyone put words in his mouth, and I think Angelina is way too smart to try any such a thing. He evidently loves being a father; he’d been wanting children for years before he left Aniston, who obviously didn’t share his priorities, and now that he has Angelina and the children she has given him, by birth and by adoption, he’s happy as a clam. I’m happy for him.

  23. Ned says:

    The cowerdly tactic of hiding behind other people has been Angelina’s main image saving stategy.

    She hid behind her adopted child when Billy Bob cheated on her and ended their marriage, she hid behind her new adoptive children (as did Brad) and she sent Brad to take the blame when O and other criticized her exploiting her newborns to promote her latest movie by posing breast-feeding with them.

    Now she is using Brad AGAIN- to try to mend (in her own mind) her damaged image.

    Unfortunely, it is only further damaging Brad image, and serves as a reminder to all the rest- that he is a disrepectful cheater- which is hardly what Brad wants to remind his female audience now when he has a holiday season opening of a new film.

    Families don’t come together to celebrate a cheater’s film.

    Reminding the audience that he is both disrespectful to the decade spend with his wife, and that he is a cheater- is hardly what a SMART guy would do.

    Especially since his past films have failed and even more importantly- this is a Christamas opening- a family oriented marketing should have been applied.

    So, Brad is acting stupid and handled by Angelina and try to seve Angelina’s wishes to hurt Jen and make it clear to others that HE is the one who cheated and HE DOES love her.

  24. Ned says:

    It is obvious the only person who wishes to gain something is Angelina.

    Her only gain is to try and hurt Jen, which doesn’t serve Angelina image or rational from a marketing point of view, but rather a “street” backstabbing to a woman who didn’t do her no wrong.

    Again- if Brad is being run by irrational whims of Angelina, that will end up hurting the both of them-

    perhaps he should consider listening to other PR professionals who can think rationaly about his interests, rather than Angelina’s irrational motives.

  25. Kink says:

    I can identify with the “dead end” thing. It’s a personal revelation that probably a lot of people come to when they chose to stop partying and settle down with someone. You want more than that kind of life can give you, sort of like “growing up.” It just takes some people longer to get there…LOL.
    i can also identify with the people saying Brangelina mushy nonsense all over the press makes them nauseated.

  26. raven says:

    I saw JA on Oprah the other day and I also saw the interview with Brad and Fincher on Charlie Rose last night. JA said she was really proud of the things Brad was doing.
    She seemed believable to me. I completely agree with Geronimo that Brad’s comment about life being a dead end was a very personal one reflecting the shallowness of his Hollywood lifestyle.

    People change over time and evolve. Some who weren’t involved are clearly living back in 2005. Those who were involved seem to have moved on. Maybe we should as well.

  27. Ned says:

    His shallowness is the same.
    He lives in huge mansions and drags his children from one rented mansion to fancy hotels, while he can’t even take care of them without an army of nannies.

    That is far from evolved.
    He seems to be in regression.

    I thought he was a man who does what is right for his interests and now he comes across as a puppet for Angelina’s whims.

  28. DD says:

    His remarks come off as a tad insensitive, but Brad and AJ aren’t known for their sensitivity and it has been years since the split. Although I hope that he really does appreciate his new life and makes a, unhollywood like, life long commitment to this family.

  29. HallieB says:

    ned, you are way too personally invested in the lives of people you do not know. You sound like an irrational obsessed fanatic in your endless rants against Angelina and to a lesser degree Brad.

    A divorce occurred going on 4 years ago. The childless divorced couple have both moved on and both say they are quite happy with new partners and with their present lives. You act as if you know better than they do. You appear to have a real problem with reality and with the fact that you can’t control the lives of others.

    Please move on, your sanity is in great danger. Get some professional assistance as you exhibit severe anger issues. Find a way to live your own life.

  30. DD says:

    hehe ned you are trying too hard to portray AJ as some witch. She’s just a human with good and bad traits like the rest of us.

  31. Alice says:

    We all go through many changes in life and as we get older really begin to ask ourselves what do we want out of life in the time left to us. I see this as what Brad did. He was in his 40’s, began to urgently want a family with children, and he was with someone who did not share his goals. Then he met someone who did share his life goals and that was that.

    I really believe the 2 formerly married adults have long since moved on, and both have found what makes their lives worth living. Why some have a problem with that has to do with their own personal situations, it has nothing to do with the formerly married couple at all.

  32. Cheyenne says:

    He seems to be very happy that he met someone who shares his goals, outlook and values in life and who loves him enough to give him the family he always wanted to have. He certainly seems to be in his element as head of a big family. From what I can tell from reading his comments about his family life, and seeing photos of him with Angie and their children, he seems to be a natural-born father.

    I think he’s looking forward to growing old with Angie and sharing many years and life experiences with her. OTOH, sometimes people start at the same point and just grow so far apart that they have nothing to hold them together any more, and I think this is what happened between him and Aniston. It was nobody’s fault; they were just two people who couldn’t make a life together.

  33. Anni says:

    Ned, dude…chill pill.

  34. lene says:

    he still needs to refer on the start of their love…and those “dead end”…which i understand as a pun toward JA…to promote a movie? somekind…he uses the boring love triangle still…don’t you think so too?

    i would love to read more about his movie plans and current work of charity instead of promoting AJ when HIS movies come out.

    i like HIM…and watch his movies because of HIM…and not because of AJ or JA or his six kids. he should keep his kids in private. it’s not for public, i think.

  35. anastasiabeaverhausen says:

    He was married to Aniston for about four years almost four years ago and he’s in his mid 40s, right? His time with Aniston was really a short blip on the radar of his life, when you think about it time-wise. That’s why I doubt he meant the dead end crack against her. As a parent, I know what he means. I only have one child, not six, but having and raising that one child has made me feel very personally fulfilled (I also have a career, in case anyone jumps on that). He probably feels the same. My husband does, too. Not having at least one child was just out of the question. It probably was for Brad, too. It is for a lot of people.

    So he wanted kids, he got kids, he felt his life was empty before his kids, hell, TONS of parents have said that very same thing.

  36. anastasiabeaverhausen says:

    Alice, well put. I should have just said “ditto Alice.”

  37. monica says:

    you all need to chill and stop driniking the tainted water. you don’t even know these people…blah. they all suck!

  38. Kristen says:

    I agree with Geronimo and Hallie B. –

    It sounded to me that he was unfulfilled in his life with out children. He seems to feel complete with a family and his committment to charity work.

    Jen herself has said that she is over it. They should all be able to speak their minds.

  39. Kristen says:

    Ned ~

    Seriously?

    I think there is a Jennifer thread you could get together with all the AJ/BP haters and talk about crap that happened 4 YEARS AGO!

  40. NotBlonde says:

    What I find interesting is that he says he wishes people would stay out of his personal life, yet he CONSTANTLY talks about it. In detail.

  41. monica says:

    really, the LA Times?
    they just reviewed this movie and trashed it, so that is surprising but refreshing to see a news outlet still be unbiased.
    i also agree that i think that brad is refering to his hw life in general and did not allude to jen.
    to me, he seems off though. can’t explain it.
    i saw this movie and it was dragging. i would be surprised if he wins any awards for this role.

  42. Nicole says:

    Ned you are REALLY desperate. If Angelina wanted to use Brad to improve her image, she would have done it from the START, when people were calling her whore and homewrecker. The “uncool” thing is by far the least vile situation that has come from this ridiculous triangle, and to think she would only NOW start using Brad now is beyond ridiculous. Please, try to use your brain before you make this shit up.

    Why would you even think EITHER of them are thinking about Aniston? What is there to think about? “Oh, Jen went tanning today!” Neither of them has the time to sit around plotting against Aniston. The day when the same could be said of Aniston will be a great one!

  43. Jenny says:

    I am really suprised at how these two liars swore nothing was going on in Mr& Mrs Smith, now they admit they were screwing around behind Jennifer’s back and to everyone, it is OK???? Hmmm???

    No one is even the least bit offended at all the lies? Do you remember Jolie saying she doesn’t talk to her Dad becuse he cheated on her Mom and she could never cheat with a married man??

    I just don’t get it. May you all experience the same thing in your own home. Let’s see how you accept it when it is your husband.

  44. Priscilla says:

    As far as I am concerned, Jennifer Aniston has more class in her little finger than Pitt has in his whole body. Speaking publicly of personal issues in a way that is meant to demean and humiliate someone else is despicable, and I agree that Angelina is likely pulling the strings here, in order to get retribution for the “uncool” remark ( a remark that Aniston made in passing and happened to be rght on the money)

    Here’s hoping that Brad shuts the hell up after he’s done promoting his film, and that “Marley” kills “Button” at the box office

  45. Melinda Dillon says:

    He is a total and complete a)hole who cheated on his wife. I hope life kicks in him the b*lls.

  46. patricia says:

    These two need to lay off the uber doses of themselves and shut up. I am so sick of hearing them speak about their perfect worlds. If their worlds were so perfect they wouldn’t need a press release to confirm it. I also think what an ass this man is to be so insensitive to every aspect of his life that came before his dead end. The real dead end is his narcisism.

  47. patricia says:

    Plus they are both starting to look like muppets.

  48. Jouptheanna says:

    I hate that pussy-duster he’s sporting. It makes me want to shoot him in the face.

  49. Linda says:

    What an effing moron!

  50. Alice says:

    Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

    That disqualifies all of us here as no one is perfect, no one.

    Judge not lest ye be judged.

    Good words to live by. There is no room in the inn for those who are biased and prejudiced and always judgemental of others.

  51. NotBlonde says:

    Alice: You clearly haven’t been on one of the Jennifer Aniston-specific threads. Perhaps you should give that advice to those people…

  52. A.J. says:

    Unless any of you have concrete evidence regarding what happened between Jolie and Pitt, would you kindly grow up and get over it already? You can generalize and throw as much conjecture out there as you want, but the bottom line is that you know nothing, and your conjecture is nothing more than that. I’m not a huge fan of either Jolie or Pitt (nor am I a fan of Aniston for that matter) but the marriage was already pretty unstable for whatever occurred to transpire. Either way, gtf over it and stop the ridiculous diatribes. It makes you look psychotic and pathetic.

    Back on topic, I saw the movie last night. It had it’s good moments, but there was a lot of downtime in it that made it seem to drag on and on. Not a total dud, but you’re better off waiting for the dvd rental than forking over $12 at a theater.

  53. Lindalou says:

    I strongly dislike separating children who have been adopted against children born to a family in any way, with any words. They are all their children regardless of how they came to the family.

  54. joe says:

    “And the greater the love, the greater the loss. I certainly feel that now with the woman I’m with, and the children that I have. But whatever the course may be, this time together is extraordinary.”

    What does this mean. Whatever the course may be? Does that mean that he doesn’t know for sure that him and Angie will be together “until death do them part”. Surely he isn’t thinking that if things don’t work out he can walk away again. They have children. Brad needs to realize that this is for life now. No changing his mind.

    I also get a kick out of this article. He is obviously trying to show Jen he can throw the punches too. Her uncool comments really upset their camp. i don’t think that Jen is “scared” though. Don’t think she could actually care less. Shows he has that sensitivity chip missing. What a jerk to go off like this about his life. Seems he just can’t keep anything to himself. Even if he did feel this way no gentleman would say it. Pretty sad. Jen must be so glad that he is not in her life anymore. Angie can have him. She will probably regret it later in life but for now she thinks she has stolen him so it makes it exciting. Poor thing – Brad is the last person most of hollywood would have hook up with no wonder he took Angie he didn’t have much choice after Jen really didn’t want to have his off spring. Angie was the only one who would do it for him.

  55. Lindalou says:

    In response to the army of nannies comment: They dont have an army of nannies. They use very few nannies for very few hours compared to most well to do people. They do however have an army of housekeepers, assistants, cooks, maids, decorators, make up and hair dressers…

  56. Cheyenne says:

    “And the greater the love, the greater the loss. I certainly feel that now with the woman I’m with, and the children that I have. But whatever the course may be, this time together is extraordinary.”…. What does this mean.
    ***************************************

    In the interview on Charley Rose with David Fincher and Brad Pitt, Brad was talking about how CCOBB made him face the fact of his own mortality. What he is talking about, of course, is the loss everybody has to face through death sooner or later. The more you love someone, the more it hurts to lose them.

    My aunt was happily married for 64 years before my uncle passed away five years ago. She still misses him every single day.

  57. Josephina says:

    Alice-

    True words of wisdom. We are all sinners, and so, to skip through the Bible to pick and chooose which “sin” you want to denounce Brad for ( and of course, it is the sin that YOU have yet committed)… well, it is ridiculous. Ned is at least in violation of slandering another person by providing false witness; however, he seems to be at ease with this destructive and irresponsible behavior.

    There are a number of remarkable and immature people on this blog- Ned, Jenny, Anastasia—. They work very hard at dismissing the fact that Jen and Brad were a mismatch for each other. They both are attractive people. You need so much more than that to sustain a marriage. Whatever Brad and Jennifer shared, over time it became no longer enough to keep Brad in a committed relationship. Brad left his marriage because he wanted to move on with his life and not as a husband to Jennifer. How many more signs of incompatibility do you need to see?

    Sex alone will NOT KEEP ANY human being on a long term relationship. So stop implying that Angelina “stole” Brad through her looks and sexual prowessness. Brad and Angelina have much more in common with each other, and like it or not, these two are just living their lives together in love and raising their kids.

    As for Jen, she should slow down and re-evaluate her choice in partners. Brad was never suitable for her in the first place. If you include Brad, there have been a string of passersby spanning over 10 years- Paul Sculfor, Vince Vaughn (the rebound guy), John Mayer and Brad- that have not been completely suitable for her. She should choose more wisely.

  58. Valerie Allarie says:

    Am I the only one happy all the Jolie-Pitts were born outside of the US, thus ineligible to become President…the fascination with these two and their 6 (albeit beautiful), kids, makes no sense. Both one note actors of average intelligence and below average moral compass’.

  59. flutterfly says:

    It’s probably just me but I don’t understand the tabloid fascination with these 3 people who are all only slightly above average talents. None of them has an interesting personality beyond what this cheating/cuckolded drama has given them and none of them has made a truly timeless contribution to their art. They are merely stars of their time.

    Angelina Jolie was your typical exhibitionist rebel now turned artsy earth mother who is as attention-seeking as ever, to the point that I don’t take her seriously despite applauding the attention she brings to overlooked parts of the world. Jennifer Aniston has yet to find an artistic identity beyond the sexy girl next door that Rachel gave her and she looks to be overcompensating daily for the desperate and lonely labels that the tabloids have affixed to her. Brad Pitt seems like a well-intentioned actor who is yet to be much more than just there for a movie role.

    None of these people has the talent, imagination, or presence of a Cate Blanchett, a Clint Eastwood, a Julianne Moore, a George Clooney. And what these actors have is the ability to maintain a mystique, and a detachment from any attention that goes their way. This is where this Aniston-Jolie-Pitt trio really come up short. Just my opinion.

  60. A.J. says:

    flutterfly: you nailed it, and eloquently so.

  61. Spike says:

    Right on Flutterfly. Well put!

  62. hmmm says:

    Flutterfly is the most sane person on these boards.

  63. VA yes they can says:

    Current U.S. statutes define certain individuals born overseas as “citizens at birth,” including all persons “born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person[s]. Section 301of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

    Therefore Shiloh, Knox, and Vivienne are eligible to be US President.

    Just the truth and nothing but the truth.

  64. Jenfraud says:

    Aniston should be writing Brad a thanks note for keeping her in the press by making her ex-Mrs. Pitt. Really Brad should ANNUL that marriage, which was a devious plot conceived by Aniston and her agency, CAA, for her dead-career advancement. ANNUL that marriage, Brad! She doesn’t deserve to exist in your past. Do it for you children, erasing the loser completely from your past!

  65. EB says:

    Amen Flutterfly. This menage a troi is a ploy for media attention on each party’s side.

    I saw the movie yesterday and it definitely NOT good. Phoned in performances, cliches spouted every five minutes, and WAY TOO LONG. It was almost 3 hours! They could have lost an hour off the movie and it would have improved it greatly. I love Cate, but this was not her best performance – mostly because the script was mediocre. Brad as usual was curiously without emotion, kind of like Keanu Reeves almost. I doubt he will actually be awarded for this film.

  66. emma says:

    Valerie Allarie, yes they can run for pres – well at least shiloh, viv, and knox can. i mean after all, wasn’t mccain born in panama or something like that? he was able to run for president.

  67. beebee says:

    Ooh hate to say it but no, they can’t and the only reason McCain was allowed to run for president is because Panama was under U.S. control by the time he was born.

  68. hmmm says:

    They can become President as long as they are a resident in the United States for 14 years (as their parents are both citizens of the United States and thus are citizens of the United States). As it seems now, they aren’t doing so well in getting those 14.

    Also: why are we discussing this?

  69. janice says:

    come on people to keep talking about the past and not talking about the future is pathethic which is all this man can do he trys to sound wise but is a total fool who gets his speeches written for him. his deepest though is with the bottom head as he has only one brain cell. jen and angie where both stupid and unlucky to ever have had this man in their lives. jen got out but i fear jolie is stuck with him as she sure can’t manage 6 or more kids. this man is balless and worthless so please people talk about someone worth while

  70. lene says:

    http://www2.cinemas-online.co.uk/website/gossip.phtml?gid=716

    do you remeber the gossip about jen has had a miscarriage? the link is about that.

  71. Payton says:

    The “dead end” quote will be linked to Brad for all of eternity! I like Jen, but she acts like a college party girl, rather than motherhood material.

  72. les says:

    Why oh why do they talk about their private lives and then complain when their lives are being invaded? Brad Pitt and his paramour are nothing but publicity who**s.

    Promote your movies and shut the heck up about what goes on at home. This whole article makes him look like an insensitive twit. He obviously loved his wife at one point and made a life with her. To disrespect it like this is really quite disgusting.

  73. les says:

    Jenfraud – I see you everywhere. Get help. Your devotion to these two borders on psychotic.

  74. les says:

    I LOVE it when people post like they know these people personally. Josephina – do you know these people? How can anyone make comments such as these with any credibility?

    What most of us know is what we read. There is no telling what the real truth is.

  75. o says:

    boy is he dumb.
    dumb trying to sound deep.
    he must be a bore to hang out with.

  76. moonunit says:

    no, they cannot be president. you have to be a natural-born citizen. in mccain’s case, he was born on a U.S. base. the U.S. did not “control” panama (though they did convince the panamanians to secede from colombia) — the U.S. military administered the panama canal until we gave that control back to the country. it doesn’t matter that both angelina and brad are U.S. citizens, their “genetic” children cannot become president because they were not born on U.S. soil (a U.S. military base would count here). seriously, why do U.S. adults not know this?

  77. lene says:

    jenfraud…he should annul the marriage to jen? seriously…wtf is wrong with you? why so mean?

  78. Anonymous says:

    “Once you hit 40, you start reexamining the math of it all,…”

    I guess I can we can now rank Brad among the world’s most insightful philosophers. Due to the heights of his amazing depth and wisdom, we are now enlightened as to that which humanity ponders upon reaching 40. Reading that quote conjures up for me that modeling image of him in college in which his big 80s hair, and brightly colored clothes nearly resemble a clown suit, with his pose mimicking a childs modeling portfolio shot.

    This dizzying intelligence and insight comes from a guy who always matched his hair to that of his current girlfriends, and as an adult and not as a teen, mind you. Consider the source. He is still matching his hair and clothes to his partner. From this guy we expect depth? He should stick to self-promotion – it is more palatable.

    His world is not a real world. It is a grossly over budgeted (by virtue of his looks, and not his mind) fantasy world and his mindset reflects the limitations of such.

  79. sen says:

    I agree that it’s time for all of us to move on–Team Aniston, Team Jolie, Brangelina–

    but since we haven’t yet, let me just nominate Brad Pitt as Worst Ex of the Decade. I’m glad if he’s found joy in fatherhood and in his relationship with Jolie. And his philanthropy, great. He’s still been a complete tool in the way he’s treated Aniston in public. A man with a little class and sensitivity would have managed to convey something like, “Jennifer’s a wonderful woman and I was lucky to have the relationship wtih her that we had, but we weren’t able to make each other happy enough to stay together.” If he once loved her enough to marry her, he should respect her feelings even after he’s no longer in love with her.

    So I count him as a philanthropical and creative dude who seems to love his kids and his current partner, but has been lousy to his ex. The way he’s talked about Jennifer reveals his character, not hers. Even if she were a terrible person, it wouldn’t excuse his insensitivity toward her in public.

  80. Leah says:

    “I don’t care for the way the LA Times guy refers to Brad’s children – separating them between “their own” and “adopted”. My feeling is that the best, most politically correct way to refer to these (or any) children is biological and adopted, not “their own.”

    Totally agree. You would think that journalists for the LA Time would be more professional than that, that they would catch that.

  81. DD says:

    sen I completely agree with you. I balk at his insensitivity toward her and their past marriage and I don’t know why JA would ever give him any kind words.

  82. Rose says:

    Angie and Brad should shot up because of them need more attention. They don’t accepting they both mistake if they hold horny side while taping Mr. and Mrs. SMith. If Brad and Jen filed divorce and finalize then Angie step in people wont choose sides. Wtf angie say I won’t do that another women who stole hushband to another woman all shiloh is product of the movie thats why they keep doing good deeds so the people wont pay attention what kind screw up they did. Money talks. ALL THE GOOD DEEDS IS TAX FREE FOR MONEY.

  83. kelly says:

    Do any of y’all spend as much time and mental/emotional energy parsing, analyzing and discussing the front page of your newspaper?

    Just askin’…

  84. sen says:

    kelly, why indulge in reading a gossip site if you’re not even going to enjoy it!?

    I do read the front of the paper, and then I like to lighten up by gossiping. I don’t have the answer about global warming or the horrible ongoing war(s) in the Congo, but I do feel like I know the answer to Brad Pitt’s love life, and that’s a satisfying feeling to have once a day or so.

  85. Bodhi says:

    All three of them talk about their personal lives equally. And they all need to quit it.

    I understand what he meant by that statement. It wasn’t a “dig” at Jen at all. These people are responding to questions asked of them. They don’t sit there & plan out “digs” at their exes.

    Y’all need to chill the hell out.

  86. hmmm says:

    moonunit: You CAN become President if you’ve been born outside of the United States. It’s hilarious that everyone made a HUGE deal about it during the election when in fact all you had to do was live here for 14 years. It says so in the Constitution and there are a million and one little loopholes as to how you can be a “naturalized” Citizen of the US. Someone from Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Islands, Guam or born abroad from two US citizens can be President of the United States.

    It’s amazing that everyone doesn’t know that when a simple civics class would suffice.

  87. pamela says:

    sen, he did in fact make warm comments about his ex last year in the same interview that he said they “maintain a deep friendship” or words similar. In the beginning he said nothing except to say he will be “the bad guy”. Jen made all her “missing a sentitivity chip” and other snaky comments, and Brad said nothing.

    I always find it amazing that over the ensuing years after the divorce, one party in the marriage was talking all the time, and the general public was free to give their analysis, and it was all good. But as soon as the other party who was in the marriage says anything… and he has every right to give his perspective, seeing it was his marriage and all… suddenly he is being mean and insentitive.

    Jen said soon after the break-up, that knowing Brad, he wouldn’t talk. She used that knowledge to her advantage. Brad is promoting a movie that tackles the fragility of life, and the people who make an impact in our lives. That is all he is doing. And if you are lucky to reach your 40’s and have children, and are not philosophical, then something is definitely missing.

  88. Starla says:

    Interesting. So when Jen says ANYTHING, she’s pathetic & since Brad & her broke up four years ago, she needs to “move on”. Brad & Angie got together four yaers ago, too. Time for them to STFU and move on.
    Ned, can we be friends??!!

  89. Hallie says:

    Seriously, all three “actors” (and I use that term very loosely) have been using their private lives to support their “careers.” All three have lost major respect because of this, I feel. Look at the other great actors out there (Kate Winslet, Cate Blanchett,
    and so on) you never hear them blabbing about their private lives then hypocritcally complaining about tabloid invasion on their privacy. These three sad losers are made for each other, because without the triangle, the public would have lost interest in them a long time ago. All three are just low grade fame whores.

  90. Bodhi says:

    Time for ALL of them to shut up.

  91. Sandy says:

    Oh please…I’m not even a huge fan of these three people but note there is a big difference between a man mentioning how much he loves his partner/family (PRESENT) and a woman mentioning a two year old interview about her ex’s current partner and comments made then (PAST). And at the same time, speaking glowingly about your ex-husband when he was the one who you should be aiming your venom toward.

    She can certainly say what she wants but the difference here is one person seems to really have the focal point on what is currently happening in their lives vs the past. Surely the reporter is going to ask questions but you can (and most celebs do) provide a list of ‘off limits’ subjects. My understanding is his other interviews haven’t even mentioned anything related to his past. In the above, the comment pertaining to a dead end seems to speak broadly to his entire life prior to his divorce, not just specifically his ex-wife. I’d bet she’d say something similar…it was obvious from interviews they gave in the last couple years of their marriage they weren’t happy together. So it ended. Simple.

    And in reading this article, I see him speaking pretty generally regarding his love Angelina and their kids. Unless there is something I’m missing, I don’t see any ‘personal details’ about their life together. Why is what he said here any different than any other celebrity that is promoting their film and looking for parallels in the character to relate to their own life? The only time we really even see him or Angelina giving interviews and such is around the time they are promoting projects.

  92. PJ says:

    Brad has made it clear that his kids come first. He’s said that many times. Notice he says he can’t wait to come home to his kids, not that he can’t wait to come home to Angelina. He’s spoken of his love for his kids often.

    Note that he couldn’t wait to formally adopt Maddox and the others, but he’s dragging his feet about marrying their mother. That says where his priorities are.

  93. Starla says:

    I’ve seen Brad’s interviews. He can barely put a sentence together. I would imagine Angelina wrote his “speech” & he had a dictionary nearby to look up the big words.

  94. anastasiabeaverhausen says:

    Josephina, I was surprised to see my name in your list of those you disagree with, since I agreed with your post. You might have me mixed up with someone else.

  95. pamela says:

    PJ,

    Could it be, just let’s say, a mutual decision that they BOTH made re: marriage. They have both said that they feel married, and their committment together is their children.

    No one is dragging his/her feet. Other notable celebrities hae children without the benefit of marriage. No ne is questioning them.

  96. NotBlonde says:

    Josephina, I have to respectfully disagree. I think any woman who purposefully engages in any type of behavior that would assist a married man in cheating on his wife is despicable and can’t be trusted. Brad, of course, is the biggest loser in the UnHoly Trinity.

    But I have to say that no, a woman cannot “steal” a man from another woman, but she can engage in immoral behavior that I personally do not approve of. This includes becoming far more than “just friends” without being sexual in any way. I just think women should leave a married man alone. Period.

  97. Leah says:

    It’s been 2.5 years of Brangelina:
    ————————————-
    lol. Actually it’s been 4 yrs not 2.5. That just proves how stuck in the past some people really are. They don’t even realize it’s been 4 yrs.

  98. Salisbury says:

    A man with a little class and sensitivity would have managed to convey something like, “Jennifer’s a wonderful woman and I was lucky to have the relationship wtih her that we had, but we weren’t able to make each other happy enough to stay together.” If he once loved her enough to marry her, he should respect her feelings even after he’s no longer in love with her.
    ________________________________________
    What? Pitt did all that when he did his GQ interview in 2005. It was Aniston’s Vanity Fair bullsh*t article that caused all this ruckus. Her ego was damaged because he moved on before she did and the rest is history. Brad Pitt has said NADA about any of it until last year and briefly during his Babel press when he said his life made no sense anymore. Aniston is the one who has continued all of this. Brad and Angelina have every right to discuss their life together. You don’t like it then don’t read it. It’s very simple

  99. Aware says:

    This interview makes it clear that Brad is still acting his way through his life; his role now is happily partnered (not married) with many children. His old roles were hippie, man-about-town sophisticated , etc. Read up on him and you will see how his entier id changed with each partner into a mirror reflection of theirs. For Angie’s sake and the sake of the kids, i hope he makes this one “real”. He’s too old to play those narcissistic games any more. Parenthood means responsibility, and not just for a few years until one “gets bored with that life” but for a lifetime. Don’t fail them now Brad…it’s forever.

  100. dovesgate says:

    @ hmmm – You can’t be President if you were born outside the States unless its on US soil, i.e. a US military base. Please go back to 8th grade and re-read the Constitution.

    Section 1 of Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution states that a President must:

    1. be a natural born citizen of the United States (NOT BORN OUTSIDE US SOIL)
    2. be at least 35 years old
    3. have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years

    Schwarzenegger can be Governor of California but he can never be President.

  101. NotBlonde says:

    Hmmm is right.

    The Governator’s parents aren’t US Citizens. Go back to your college civics class and learn all the little loopholes.

    If your parents are US Citizens, you are a US Citizen, period. ALL US Citizens can run for President as long as they are 35 years of age and have lived in the US for 14 years.

  102. Paloma says:

    I agree with Judy .. I think he has way moved on from JA. Doubt he thinks about her that much. It is not cruel, it is what it is. He does not have to censor himself for the rest of his life on how he feels.

  103. Paloma says:

    I saw a pic of him and Aniston on a vacation with Courtney and David (this was not the last ill-fated vacation). He looked completely bored and totally miserable. I thought then that was odd.

  104. RAN says:

    He’s an a@@. Although I do give him credit for his dreams of being the perfect father. However, if this is how he treats people who were special to him at one time in his life, but have since butted up against him, how is he going to treat his kids when they get their own life? What happens when they get sassy, arrogant, obnoxious? That’s when his lack of sensitivity will tear at the center and be the destruction of their emotional well being.

  105. emma says:

    As far as I am aware, the Constitution doesn’t clearly distinguish what is exactly a natural born citizen – whether it’s jus soli (right of soil) or jus sanguinis (right of blood).

    Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

    Anyone born inside the United States *
    Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
    Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
    Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
    Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
    Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
    Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
    A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
    * There is an exception in the law – the person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.

    Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President.

    The issue has been brought up several times throughout the years.

    George Romney, Mitt Romney’s dad, ran for the GOP nomination in ’68, was born in Mexico to parents who were U.S. presidents.

  106. Cheyenne says:

    Paloma, I can totally relate to how Brad was looking. That fluffball would make anyone completely bored and totally miserable. I’d hate to have to spend an afternoon with her. You can only talk about the weather for two or three minutes, and after that, there’s nothing else you can talk to her about.

  107. Bodhi says:

    This interview makes it clear that Brad is still acting his way through his life; his role now is happily partnered (not married) with many children. His old roles were hippie, man-about-town sophisticated , etc.

    People grow up. People make decisions to change their lives all the time. There is no evidence that he isn’t serious about his family.

  108. Olivia says:

    I only have 1 comment to make you were unhappy with the reporter for calling the children “their own” and “adopted”. You felt that “biological” was a better term. As a mother who has given birth as well as adopted I strongly disagree with both terms! The way I and every other adoptive parent refers to them is “Our children”! There is never and should never be a distiction made, that will only serve to have a child grow up feeling left out, not really wanted, or not good enough. We as parents love these children the same and I dont understand why the general public has such a hard time understanding this.

  109. Bodhi says:

    Ditto Olivia! When adults choose to add children to their lives, no matter the “method”, those children are those adults’ children. No distinction is necessary.

  110. HallieB says:

    Bravo Olivia. Your children are your children, period. Brad and Angelina always refer to their children as their children, there is no difference made. Only the insensitive or ignorant or those who have an agenda of some type refer to kids in a way that separates them in their family.

    Bravo emma, you are 100% correct. The Gov of CA was born in Austria, became a US citizen as an adult, he cannot be President.

    BUT,the three youngest Jolie-Pitts, born in Namibia and France with both parents being US citizens who have a residence in the US, can be President if they decide to run and are elected.

    Some people need to go back to school and retake history, or research and educate themselves as to what is true or not.

  111. Goddess711 says:

    If he’s trying to go for the Clark Gable look, he’s way off. Part of Gable’s charm was integrity; Pitt ain’t got none of that.
    Yeah, he’s right – as long as they keep collecting kids they’ll stay in the media. After that’s done, so is he; he’s right – his life’s a dead end except for the controversy that keeps him and his ho’ on the mags!

  112. Stephanie says:

    I agree that Brad takes on the persona of whatever woman he is with. There is no evidence he has matured, it’s like he’s playing Paul Newman now. Hope both of them figure it out for the sake of the kids, but I doubt it, they’re Hollywierdos.

  113. debra77 says:

    The comments that Brad takes on the persona of the women he is with is a ridiculous statement. People look at his hair style and jump to conclusions. He has the mustache for a movie. As far as Brad and Jennifer are concerned how many other celebs have divorced since they did. Too many to name. It is the public fixation that is driving the media coverage. Brad like everyone else has changed over the years. I know that I am not the same person I was 10 years ago… Hell not even a year ago. We grow up, we have experiences that shape us. He and Jennifer divorced. She has said things about him that do not sound like a woman that was cheated on. People want Brad to apologize for something he/Angie and Jennifer have said did not happen. Brad’s marriage has been over for more then 4 years. How long does this man have to be tied to Jennifer. Everyone on this thread has an ex. Are you constantly being tied to that person? NO. Most of us can barely remember what that person even looked like. Brad has a right to talk about his life. So does Angie. They talk about each other because that is their life. He does not talk about Jennifer because she is a non entity in that life. If she is still hurting after 4 years then she has a problem. She has had several relationships since Brad. She has known several men. Why is Brad the only one she is linked too. Talk about Vince, Paul, John..Brad is in her past. This man can’t seem to shake this one relationship. It does not matter that they were married. They had no kids. The tie is broken. Damn there are people who were married for 10 or 20 years who don’t have their ex latched to them for a life time. I think the underlying problem is that Jennifer’s fans want them back together. I don’t know why, but they need to wake up and realize that this man has been there and done that. He is not going back to her. So lets all move on shall we.

  114. mimi says:

    Why should he shut up

    Because he said relationship with ex was a DEADEND — It was.

    or

    Because he said he didn’t want her to bear his children — Another fact.

    or

    Because Angie was the only woman he wanted to have his children —The Truth

    or

    Because he said relationship with Angie was evolution and the right direction —Knows what he is talking about.

    Or

    Because Angie is his greatest LOVE — that’s the truth, those with eyes can see that.

    Haters if you can’t take it,TOUGH! don’t read. Ex started it and I am happy he is responding and saying it like it was and is LOUD and CLEAR for all to hear.

    Brad love you the more and keep talking.

  115. mimi says:

    Salisbury:
    In response to your comment why should he praise the woman who trashes his kids and the love of his life in public?

    You talk about class without knowing the meaning —- What about the ex, what class does she exhibit? unless you mean classy as in spreading your private parts in a trashy magazine for the whole world to see or trashing someone else’s family as classy? If anyone has maintainted class and dignity here it is the JPs.

  116. mimi says:

    Why should he shut up

    Because he said relationship with ex was a DEADEND — It was.

    or

    Because he said he didn’t want her to bear his children — Another fact.

    or

    Because Angie is the only woman he wanted to have his children —The Truth

    or

    Because he said relationship with Angie is an evolution and the right direction — Knows what he’s talking about.

    Or

    Because Angie is his greatest LOVE — that’s the truth, those with eyes can see that.

    Haters if you can’t take it,TOUGH! don’t read. Ex started it and I am happy he is responding and saying it like it was and is LOUD and CLEAR for all to hear.

    Brad love you the more and keep talking.

  117. Yourself says:

    This man needs to use his money to buy a life and personality. He has absolutely none. He is a tool used by anyobne who wants. He will soon be like Charlie Sheen. He will say the same things about Jolie once they split.

  118. mimi says:

    debra77:

    debra you are a good person. I have read your comments in the past over at JJ. Aniston’s fans are loonies and don’t understand logic so I’m afraid to say you are wasting your time trying to explain to people with less brain than the rest of the humans. They will continue with their fanatic believes and poor jen been attacked by Brad and Angie and refuse to acknowledge her own attacks and her part in her failed marriage.
    I hope Brad continues to talk, it is the only way to shut them up, laying all the facts out in the open and see who turns out to be the biggest fat manipulating liar in the end.

  119. michelle says:

    the patriarchal streak is bleeding out. funny how some people think the culmination of their existence rests on procreation and perpetuation of the human race, without actually giving much regard to those they actually created.

    hope their kids don’t turn out to be brats that take up unnecessary space in earth. 6, and more on the way, is awfully too many wasters for this planet.

    i wonder how much parenting he and angie have done for their kids, though. though it’s very easy to brag that those adorable kids were his doing.

    i haven’t watched any brangelina movies since Mr. and Mrs., it’s fine by me. Only wished they’d be easier to avoid on hollywood gossip columns. sigh.

  120. minx says:

    Sheesh.. is there is a dumped women club who descends on every board once a thread turns positive towards Brad or AJ? Brad’s comment has to be seen in a broader sense. He’s finally found a sense in life and a goal of rasing kids with a woman he loves and who shares his views. It was painfully obvious how unhappy he was with Aniston WAY before he met AJ. I remember watching Diane Sawyer’s interwiev during which he teared up at a mere mention of children and how much he wanted a family. Jen had other priorities (it is clear now), they parted ways when he met someone who shared his. What’s the big deal about that? Aniston didn’t buy him for life, not when she didn’t adhere to her part of the bargain (having a family). She’s since dated a model/Vaughn/boytoy John Mayer (who likes to piss at his girls and talk to the press about dumping Jen–and, btw, why wasn’t Jen crying about John “missing a sensitivity chip”?). Obviously there is something seriously wrong with her choices. Not every comment of Brad is meant to hurt Jen. Only a bitter, jilted woman would construe it this way.

  121. minx says:

    I’m reading the comments again and I’m totally amused by ladies who think that JA is total class act… class act who a) spreads herself in a men’s magazine to promote a family movie
    b) has either a very bad taste in men or has her agent arrange relationship to promote her mediocre movies. Since the divorce, Brad has been with the same woman who bore him several children while Aniston has had a string of failed/phony? relationships for the benefit of the press. I won’t mention her passive-aggressive comments re AJ or Brad (she obviously can’t get over them).
    now, how has so-called “class” and who has so-called “issues”?

  122. vdantev says:

    Suck it haters.

  123. Josephina says:

    Les-
    My comments come from watching them at premieres, and their interviews, and shared experiences, much like everyone else. Are you saying only that only certain people are qualified to have opinions? It’s OK to disagree wtih someone’s opinion, really. This is almost like reading a book assigned at a book club and talking about it with a group of interesting people.

    Not Blonde-
    “Immoral behavior?” Jennifer slept with Brad the very same night of their blind first date and moved him into her house within 2 weeks of meeting him. Why aren’t you upset that she cohabitated with him before she married him? There exists many professional literature advising against living together before you marry. She should have slowed down to get to know Brad— she could have saved herself some heartache. I think it is beyond irresponsible to throw any level of blame within a marriage unto someone who is outside of a marriage. Brad wanted out and that is why certain events took place, not the other way around.

    Paloma-Agree. Brad clearly is irritated being linked in any way to Jennifer today and does not want her talking about his beloved family (which includes Angie) as she has no relations with them, which she admits. He has no intention of walking on “eggshells” for Jennifer…, and after 4 years?

    RAN- Brad tried initially to be nice to her about the divorce… but Jen kept releasing snide statements about Angie. The only reason the statments are being made because Angie is with Brad and Jen still behaves as a scorned woman IN PUBLIC, 4 years later. She is still hurt that he got seriously involved with another woman and had kids so quickly.

    If Jen really loved Brad at all, she would be happy for him and resist any critical comments towards him or his new family, which includes Angie. As long as Jen does not accept Angie as part of his present choice and part of his beloved family, she will have problems with any future “amicable” relationship with Brad. Accepting Angie is not for Angie’s or Brad’s sake, it empowers Jen to be completely free of the past (and not be tempted to talk anymore about them) and to move permanently on to a new, sustaining, satisfying love relationship.

  124. RAN says:

    Good Lord, why would Jennifer Aniston still love that douchebag? And why SHOULD she make nice comments about him? He very publicly lied to her and she very publicly came out in his defense and said “I chose to believe my husband”. Now years later he’s saying ‘PSYCHE! I’m a liar, a cheat and an ass’.

    Hon, if it were me, he wouldn’t have had nearly as much spoken good will as he has had. Again, he’s an ass.

    Quick note, how does anyone know that JA slept with BP on their first date? I’d wager a boatload of money that none of you were there.

  125. Josephina says:

    RAN
    She ran her mouth about it on the David Letterman show.

    Jennifer was not left with a mortgage she could not pay herself, unpaid child support payments, or bad credit. She is not the first to go through a Hollywood divorce. It is totally up to her to mend her broken heart. She is starting to remind me more of Denise Richards/Charlie Sheen and the Kirsten Alley nasty public marriage fallout. Your divorce does not have to play out in the media, if you don’t want the media involved. There are too many other actresses that have gone through much worse and came out of it with flying colors – without talking about the X. The key is, you have to be over your spouse, or at least fake it till you make it. Not being over your spouse in medialand is equivalent to a dog smelling fear. They will prey on your insecurities until YOU change how you look at the situation.

  126. RAN says:

    Let’s find a link then please…. Good gravy, who hasn’t slept with someone on the first date? At least she married the dude – not everyone can say that — IF it’s true.

    In any event, he’s a stinkin’ loser who can’t keep it in his pants and then he lies to his wife. I’ve got no use for the man. AJ was single – still not a whole lot of respect for her, but she’s not the cheating party here. In China, his ass would be in jail (or executed) for adultery. Not saying THAT’S right either, but perspective is a brilliant thing.

  127. Josephina says:

    RAN
    I forgot to compliment you. I think you agree that they were a mismatch. If you were married to Brad and saw that it was not working, you probably would have opted out much earlier than 4 years (which only proves my point of an ill-fated marriage.) I am more interested as to why the ending took so long.

  128. Josephina says:

    RAN
    I do not believe for a millisecond that his attraction to Angie is what broke them up at all.

    Brad did say that his relationship was a deadend, his words. Now yes, there are those who stay in a deadend marriage and make the best of it. Brad did not want to go this route. He also did not want to have children with Jen. His age and die-hard quest for fatherhood moved him out of the marriage with Jen. Look at him now, happy, very creative, taking risks and loving life as a father and committed to his family. He did not want this life with Jennifer.

    Look at Jennifer now, with John Mayer. I do not like this choice for her at all. I think she is selling herself way too short. But this is what she wants for now.

    When you are in a relationship that is a mismatch, deception on both sides is part of the game.

  129. Leah says:

    I am glad that BP is happy with his life, but i am not able to get over the fact that he was having an affair with another women, and even conceived a child while he was still married to his wife. Forget that it was JA who was his wife. I would feel the same way no matter who he was married to at the time. Marriage between a man and woman is harder than ever these days to keep together because society excepts these kinds of behavior and it ruins lives. I do not condone affairs between anyone, and being a Hollywood star does not make you exempt. I cut people out of my life who “breaks” the marriage rule. As for BP and AJ, I wish them the best for the sake of their children, but I have not watched one of their movies since. I really wish people would cut JA some slack. I have had to console friends whose spouses were having affairs or who had been left for another woman. I think this did hurt AJ just as it would any woman, and I think sh has handled herself better than anyone could have expected.

  130. mimi says:

    RAN:
    Do you really know anything about the woman you are defending?

    She herslf publicly bragged about it on Letterman’s show that she shagged Brad on their first blind date arranged by their managers while she was still engaged to Tate/D. On their second date she moved him into her house while he was vulnerable and on a rebound from the breakup with GP. People call her classy, she has been sleeping around for a long time and there is nothing classy or dignifying about this wh*re. Look at how many men she has been with (Vince, Paul, John, Cameraman on the set of M+M and John again) since her divorce and still can’t find a man and Brad has been with one woman. She is a laughing stock.

  131. mimi says:

    RAN:
    You must be JA’s fanatical fan. It is okay for her to trash Brad and his family and wrong for Brad to respond. You are deluding yourself. Brad and his family have every right to express their feelings just like everybody else. Don’t start a fight you cannot finish or know how it will end. If she doesn’t shut her trap, Brad knows a lot more to blow her bitchy ass wide open.

  132. Bodhi says:

    Leah~ I don’t thinks its for you to get over.

  133. Josephina says:

    Leah-
    I guess the only way to swallow this without a bad taste in your mouth was for Brad to divorce Jennifer 2 years into the marriage instead of 4 years. Hindsight is a mother, huh? I wish we all could be perfect in decision making like you. Why can’t you see that he made the mistake of saying “I do” and fixed it once he realized it was a deadend, before children were involved? Brad is NOT THE ONE for Jen.

    When someone moves on the way that Brad did, you must realize that this relationship is so much more than a midcrisis fling. He completely changed course with Angie. I believe that there indeed may have been some haste to end the deadend (his words) marriage and move briskly to the next chapter of his life.

    What was Jennifer thinking? Did she think he was gonna stay with her as unhappy and unsatisfied with Hollywood life as he apparently was? It takes a lot of courage to leave a marriage and start anew or with someone else, there are no guarantees. A lot of people stay married, and he did not want to stay married to Jen.

    Brad was not interested in living two lives as so many dishonest husbands do. He was not interested in having his cake and eating it too. He wants one woman, Angie. He has much more in common with her and I know you see that.

    I feel you are grabbing at straws when you say he cheated, he conceived a child while married/legally separated. None of your allegations lead to a crime committed and there is no time in jail. Relationships only get messy and ugly when they surpass beyond their expiration. Brad mentally, physically,and emotionally left the marriage, to the point that it was just a piece of paper when their “separation” was announced January 2005. Jennifer stated in interview that she knew the marriage was over in the summer of 2004. She said it was an amicable split and THEN all this victim crap comes out afterwards. Cut her some slack, 4 years later? No. A friend would tell her to move one and not to look back. Otherwise she will not see the potential beauty in life that awaits her.

  134. geronimo says:

    Bodhi – Apparently it is if you’ve taken the end of Pitt’s made-in-Hollywood marriage to JA personally and continue to live vicariously through JA’s unresolved hurt feelings. Ludicrous!!

  135. NotBlonde says:

    Josephina:
    ‘Why aren’t you upset that she cohabitated with him before she married him?’

    Because they were two single adults who weren’t MARRIED. This is what you Brangeloonies cannot understand. It doesn’t matter that she slept around. She was a single woman. It doesn’t matter that they cohabited before they got married, because neither of them were married to other people.

    Angelina Jolie knew that Brad was married. There is no way she could not have known. As soon as she started feeling that he or she was starting to have feelings beyond the friendly she should have cut it off. Period. That is immoral behavior and you know the difference.

    “I think it is beyond irresponsible to throw any level of blame within a marriage unto someone who is outside of a marriage.” I said in my comment something to the effect that Brad was to blame. Obviously you chose to ignore that bit. I’m merely saying that it was wrong of Angelina Jolie to allow a married man to get involved with her. That is wrong, pure and simple.

    I think all of them should shut up about the whole thing and stop bringing up their past period. If they want to talk about what’s happening now, whatever. But ALL of them need to stop talking about that whole situation. Now.

  136. RAN says:

    Exactly Not Blonde – completely agree.

    Mimi – whatever. I would treat you to the best *eyeroll* imaginable, but the little icons are gone. Suffice it to say… you have no idea what you’re talking about – especially as it relates to me and my “obsessions”.

    Jo, you do make some sense here, but like I said earlier, please provide a link to that interview you were talking about. As you can see… Mimi is ALL over the supposed interview and yet I still haven’t seen a link proving anything came out of her mouth. Many more people believe nonsense without proof – But again… who really cares? They were both single and consenting at the time – and well past their teen years.

  137. Starla says:

    NotBlonde, the Loonies will never get it until it happens to them. I agree with you all the way.

  138. Bodhi says:

    But ALL of them need to stop talking about that whole situation. Now.

    I agree 110%

  139. RAN says:

    Ditto Bodhi – hope you had a great holiday and the New Year is good to you.

  140. Bodhi says:

    You as well, RAN! :mrgreen:

  141. Josephina says:

    Not Blonde-
    You sound like you are married. Great. Then we can relate on this matter. The concept of marriage, and the do’s and don’ts come from the Bible. The Bible also does not condone premarital sex. The Bible also warns against slander, etc. Once again you are selectively picking what you want to hold as a transgression, or wrongdoing. Either ascribe or abide by all of what the Bible says to do and not do, as God has prescribed, or realize that we are all sinners trying to get it right. Life is not black and white, there is a lot of gray in it. You mean to tell me that in your entire life you have not hurt someone’s feelings or let them down? You have never started a relationship, and upon further review and exposure to that person, you realize that it may not last forever?

    Some relationships are meant to be brief. Everyone you meet and choose to love will not be with you forever. This relationship ran its course and ended peacefully, according to Jen.

    Angie and Brad met professionaly, worked together professionaly and started as friends, probably talking about her life as a single parent. If Brad did not have such an overwhelming interest to be a parent at that time, there may not have been a Brad and Angie. Angie has not compromised her role as a mother, it is of highest priority for her. Brad had to chase her across the world (Remember the pictures in Africa?) to convince her that their feelings should be pursued beyond attraction. If you claim that Angelina and Brad are guilty of “cheating” then by the same rule Jennifer and Vince Vaughn were “cheating” by March 2005. Their relationship was “announced” late spring 2005. The divorce was final in September, October or November of 2005.

    Both Jen and Brad had left the relationship, as they should have. It always stings when your ex has moved on quickly and/or with soemone you feel is pretty. Would you feel better if he moved on to someone fat and ugly with no children? What if he did and still gave the interview of “my life was a deadend?” Would you feel better? My point is that it is irrevelant whom he chooses as his future partner.

    I am not a Brangeloonie, just a person who thinks Jennifer is a pretty, but immature lady who hasn’t a clue why her marriage died before she was ready to let go.

  142. Katrina says:

    Just because he admitted to falling in love with Angie during MAMS does not mean they had sex. Where do some come up with such things? I fell in love with my husband long before we had sex, it’s possible you know. I wish Brad and Angelina all the happiness, they deserve it.

  143. Josephina says:

    RAN-
    The link to the interview? I know that the link is already provided on another blog, justjared.com, under the same subject. Go under the archives for Brad Pitt or Angelina Jolie, and you should be able to find it. Or you can look it up under Letterman’s website. It may require a little work, but it exists. This is not the only time she has said this, I just cannot easily recall which magazine interview covered it. Providing a link is not the easiset thing for me to do.

  144. NotBlonde says:

    I’m not married, nor do I believe in God or that the Bible is nothing more than historical fiction. By the way, the “dos and don’ts” of marriage don’t come from the Bible.

    Beyond that, I didn’t say they had sex, Katrina. Being beyond friends has nothing to do with sex.

    Josephina, I don’t know about what goes on in other people’s lives, but it doesn’t matter whether or not the marriage is emotionally “over”. They were legally still together and being involved with a legally married man is wrong. Wait until the divorce. Wait until it is really over. From the outside, that is what is right and moral.

  145. Josephina says:

    Not Blonde-
    If you are chastising Angelina, please include Jen first as she flirted with Vince Vaughn while still legally married to Brad, and since she is the one so upset about her breakup. Leave outsiders outside the marriage. She did not wait until her own divorce was final to start sleeping with Vince. The mischaracterterization of Angie based on her friendship with Brad (at that time) is silly.

    The Bible offers infinite wisdom on how to deal with everyday strife and how to deal with people in a positive and constructive manner. You should read a few verses in this book of “fiction.” I invite you to read the Book of Proverbs.

    The concept of marriage was first mentioned in the Bible, thousands of years ago. All present day marriage adaptations, including yours, stem from the Bible.

    It is very difficult to do the right thing all the time each moment of the day. Here is the big picture: human beings WILL make bad choices, and hurt other human beings, sometimes intentionally. You must learn to forgive them so that you can move on and continue to receive the good things in life. Being resentful and unforgiving does nothing but alter or prevent your own course for greatness and prosperity.

    All of what I said and will continue to say, comes from the teachings in the Bible, you know… the fictitious book.

  146. Codzilla says:

    RAN: Hang in there, girl. I don’t care enough about Jen/Brad/Angie to weigh in on the debate, but you’re always a sane voice in all of this madness, and for that, I applaud you.

    Bohdi: Ditto. And you’re right on about the “time for everyone to STFU” sentiment.

  147. nina says:

    Look at BP’s and AJ’s biographies. Both come from very simple backgrounds. AJ’s mom grew up in uneducated poverty, AJ’s father was not around, she barely finished highschool etc…BP’s parents did not provide much exposure either. JA’s parents were not blue blood, but she grew up most privileged out of the 3, in NYC and in Europe, where she was exposed more to different people and different ways of life. She is more confident, which is why she does not have to try as hard as BP and AJ and does not seem as fake.
    BP dropped impulsively out of his undergrad studies shortly before graduation same way he dropped out of his marriage, similarly saying that it was going nowhere. His divorce reflects on him more than on JA.
    Sure, relationships are tricky etc but while getting together with married man is not unusual it is not an admirable achievement to be discussed in public over and over again.

  148. NotBlonde says:

    Josephina, you don’t know if Jennifer Aniston started sleeping with Vince Vaughn when she was still with Brad Pitt so you seem to be making up stuff to make a point.

    Marriages existed before the Bible, as did morals and ways to deal with other humans in a civil manner. There were plenty of people living before the Bible was written and they seemed to get along just fine. Ancient Greeks, Romans and Chinese all got married without the help of a Bible.

    Both Brad and Angelina have stated that their romantic relationship began while they were filming Mr. And Mrs. Smith. While Brad and Jennifer were still legally married. Stop making excuses for those two and just understand that they did something wrong together.

    I understand that all people make mistakes and do other people wrongs, but you seem to not think that Brad or Angelina did anything wrong. Which isn’t true.

    Animal Farm also has some really interesting thoughts in it related to how to treat others in society. A lot of Shakespeare’s plays are morality plays. Buddhism teaches many many things that are related to the Bible and it is centuries older.

  149. nashnash says:

    May I ask what is is about Brad and Angie that make people like them so? Is it their philanthropy, their beautiful children, their good looks? It’s ok to like them for those reasons, but to defend them as if your lives depended on it? I admit I commend them for their charities and their beautiful children, but I cannot overlook the fact that Brad is an adulterer. I’ve read comments saying Brad didn’t cheat because he didn’t love Jennifer by the time he was seeing Angie, but it’s not even about love. It’s about respect for the person in the relationship with you. The ability to just drop everything and start an affair while you’re still married speaks of selfishness. I am surprised we can just easily accept a man who cheats on his wife and even see that as a wonderful thing just because he’s finally found love. Sure, it happens every day, but that does not make it right. There is something really wrong with our society if we don’t hold marriage vows sacred anymore. Don’t even tell me that Brad has the right to be happy, he could be happy with Angie without humiliating his ex-wife in front of the whole world.

    Angie should be careful. A friend told me once, that you should never be “the other woman” in a relationship. She said: “If he cheated on his wife/girlfriend WITH you, he will cheat ON you,too.”

    Also, Jennifer should quit talking about her life. Brad and Angie should also stop. I think these three will never stop running their mouths to the press as long as one keeps fueling the fire.

  150. Amy says:

    Ok, I saw both “Marley” and “Benjamin” and personally, I did not thing Benjamin was much better. It was way too long, to repetitive and I found Pitt’s performance kind of wooden and monotonous. He only really has charisma when he has his extraordinaryily pretty looks in his young man aged scenes. I honestly do not find him to be that great of an actor. I do not care for Angelina as a person but I think she is miles above Brad in talent. I find him pretentious and rather dumb.
    Aniston was good in the part but Marly isn’t a great movie and her part isn’t much of a stretch. She did however nail the overtired and cranky young Mother part. She needs to do more small character parts, that is where her talent is.

  151. Josephina says:

    Not Blonde-

    Brad SPECIFICALLY STATED in his interview with Larry King that the romance began AFTER the filming of MAMS. Angelina has said the same thing. THEY BOTH have stated that they fell for each other, in hindsight, during the movie but held off on the pursuit of a relationship. Anyone could see the natural chemistry between them from the scenes in the movie and probably offscreen as well. However, once Angie became a mother she changed, as most mothers do. This is why I believe that no cheating was involved, among other reasons. They have said this repeatedly, for 4 years now. Jennifer was the one who slept with Brad on their first date, she was the easy one. Brad had to chase Angie in order to get her and keep her.

    NashNash-
    They have an extraoordinary love story. They made a very popular movie together. They have a very strong international appeal, like Obama. They are risk takers. They go above and beyond just “donating money” to charity. They have influenced people worldwide to become more aware and involved globally in human rights. Angie is not just a humanitarian, she is an effective human rights/civil rights activist. Angie is a UNHCR officer and has been before she met Brad. That is why she is involved politically as well.

    Both of them love children and are parents, by choice, of a multi-racial and ethnic group of beautiful children. I find it quite embarassing as an American that Brad and Angie are ridiculed choosing to love children outside thier own race. It certainly isn’t their problem if we find it undesirable to adopt or raise children racially different from themselves.

    Because of their creativity, they are attracted to indie films and drama roles that are challenging. They are about their work and their family. They are known not just as actors, and they are always contributing to the community. And yes, they are very easy on the eyes as well.

    No one condones adultery, but it is not a crime punishable by law in the U.S. If it were, a sizeable amount of our American population would be behind bars. Who would run the country, state or local governments? Who would heal the sick, protect us from harm, and run the large and small businesses, deliver our mail? What sport would be left to watch on TV? Would we have enough teachers to teach our children? Who would preside in our courtrooms and represent our case? Get my point?

    I admire these two for their many accomplishments. They are a very accomplished couple with a large family.

  152. NotBlonde says:

    Josephina: We’ll just have to respectfully agree to disagree.

    I feel that a person knows in their heart when they like someone in a more than friendly way. If you are reciprocating those feelings (i.e. BOTH have said they “fell in love” ON THE SET of Mr. and Mrs. Smith), then that is wrong. Why you keep defending these two is pure mystery to me. Jennifer Aniston can be as easy as she wants to be. She’s an adult and you have no reason to judge her for it. Being easy isn’t illegal either.

    And by bringing up how adultery isn’t illegal, you’ve essentially admitted that the both of them (Brad and Angelina) are adulterers. It isn’t illegal, but it’s plain wrong. It doesn’t change the fact that they go great things for other people. It doesn’t change that they have a family together. But they started in on something before they should have and there is no denying that.

    It is inconsequential now, of course. It just bothers me when people say “oh it was over anyway”. It wasn’t legally and that is really what matters. Let the man get his divorce and be done with the first woman before you get involved. Who knows if he was thinking about divorce before the film. No one knows that but him. They didn’t file for divorce until after the film had come out in theaters, for crying out loud.

    I guess the point of this entire conversation is, to me anyway: Brad and Angelina did something wrong. All three of them need to stop talking about it because it happened ages ago and like someone said above, ALL of them seem to bring it up when they have a movie out because they know it’ll drum up publicity.

  153. Kim says:

    Josephina are u cheyenne? You seem to be paid to blog positively about Brangelina. Then again, Cheyenne may be on Christmas break thus the new blogger.

    Brad Pitt is too dumb for his own good. Why do his fans insist that JA refused to have a child with him when he himself has said that he did not want to have a child with her?

    He knows that this love triangle is the only thing that keeps him relevant and he is milking it for its worth.

    I find it absurd that anyone defends these two dumbos. Lets hear you denfend them when they split after Angelina has been returned to her mental asylum.

  154. CB Rawks says:

    “I’ll trade wisdom for youth any day,” Pitt says.”

    I hope he meant to say that the other way around.

  155. yourself says:

    No CB rawkes, he meant just that. But he has no wisdon or youth to trade in the first place. He is just too dumb.

  156. janice says:

    come on people brad says what he is told to say and that is all. he has no respect for woman and when the day comes to leave he will without any thought to the love of his life at that time. this speach is just a rewrite of all his previous speaches in a different way. he was telling people the love of his life was jen and he wanted lots of little jens 6 months later he left to hook up with jolie. as for jen she answered the man that asked her a question why should she shut up while these two keep her in the loop she is not a puppet and i believe she has moved on and is happy with her life no matter what other people say. jolie and pitt should shut up as well and keep their lives and thoughts private. and stop adopting kids but rather look after those they have untill they are older and then add to the family later. to those of you that say god bless the pitts he does not believe in a god so stop with the god blessings please. and yes a marriage is a committement you made before god and their is adultery comitted whether sexualy or emotionally people arn’t judging just stating the wrong that was comitted which is their right . another thing angie and pitt would most likely walk past you in the street than give you the time of day like all actors and actresses so stop putting them on a throne and admitt they have faults just like jen has. maybe you father or husband should have left your life and talk about it with no respect and then you would not critize his ex so much. remember what you do to other will come back to you

  157. axa77 says:

    He is Mr Jolie.

  158. yourself says:

    CELEBITCHY, JA’s movie owned the BO. How come you have not run that story? It is nice seeing Jen own Brangelina seeing that changeling bombed. CCOBB came in third.

  159. axa77 says:

    Josephina: you are full of b/sh*t
    Do you make it up as you go along.

    I will respond to only one piece of fiction.

    It was well know that Aniston had Brad hanging on for over 6 months before they got involved.
    People on the set of MAMS described how Jolie was throwing herself at Pitt (now Mr Jolie). The had an affair.

    Its irrelevant if they are meant / suited for one another or not. I don’t particularly care.

  160. Buttercup says:

    Nice to see the battle is still ranging over these 3 lol.

    Even though I wish all 3 of them would shut the hell up about their personal lives I am happy that Brad is speaking out more- finally. It seems quite hypocritical that only certain parties may speak and yet he can’t/shouldn’t. I’m sure he has alot more that he could say but doesn’t. Hmmmm.

  161. Steven says:

    Why do you people care?

  162. Josephina says:

    Not blonde-
    I agree with you that we will not see eye to eye about Brad and Angie. I wihsh you could appreciate them for their accomplishments. I do not think they cheated on Jennifer, period. Having an attraction is not cheating to me, it is natural to be attracted to attractive people. You have explained why you feel the way you feel when you did not have to do so. I will respect your opinion…and let it go.

    Axa77

    Little girl… believe me, if and when I take the time to share an opinion I will back it up with facts. Aniston by her own admission described on national TV her first blind date with Pitt. Secondly, I see Jennifer as an easy lay since Brad. I will consider anyone, man or female, an easy lay if they accumulate multiple bed partners over a short period of time. There is nothing wrong with being easy, you have a lot of fun and excitement in your life to say the least. I did not say she was a slut, be clear.

    Angie has loads of sex appeal and she is definitely a free spirited woman. I am not sold if she is an easy lay today. She is now a mother of six and her wild days have definitely been slowed down by Brad and motherhood.

  163. gg says:

    I skimmed over this whole page of comments and my brain is now turned to jello from the repeating endlessly and the GRAMMAR mistakes! A few of the comments are completely unreadable.

    lol

  164. NotBlonde says:

    Josephina: I don’t just take one aspect of anyone and forgive others. Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie obviously do a lot for the world community and that is lovely. But I cannot understand why someone would defend their “honor”, if you will, when they knew they were attracted to one another and “fell in love” (in their words) while one of them was legally bound to someone else. It shouldn’t get to that point with someone who is married. Ever. If you were to take them as famous people out of the situation, then there would be no question that what they did as a couple was wrong.

    I’m not saying, and I’ve already stated this, that it casts a shadow over their accomplishments as charitable individuals. But no one can sit here and say it was perfectly fine for Brad to start something with another woman while he was legally bound to one already.

    So now that I’ve said my piece, I’m done.

  165. Autumm Leaves says:

    Brad is grown and has every right to his statements. Brad is D I V O R C E D from Jen and has moved with the business of living his life.

    It’s life and most couples move together in the same direction or in different directions. IT.IS.LIFE. If you don’t move on, life will pass you by. MOVE FORWARD!! I wish the best for Jen because I’m also a fan. Same with Angelina. I wish them all health and happiness.

  166. Simone says:

    I do remember a year before the big split, that Brad made it clear he was ready for children. I do remember Jen making it clear she wanted to focus on her career. The two were in different places and they both made public their ‘dissatisfaction’ in their relationship. Brad found someone who was in the same place as him and did their thing. Jen has moved on and did what she wanted to do. Brad now declares how happy he is and so does Jen. Its win/win as far as I can see.
    The only down is the timing in which they did it – Brad clearly should have waited until his divorce was final before ‘cheating’.

  167. Di says:

    Does anybody else feel that all of this bragging about their heavently homelife is starting to sound a little phony? It’s staarting to feel like a performance rather than a family.

    I’m offended by the “their own” vs “adopted” distinction in the original article. They should have just said “biological” vs. “adopted.”

  168. Mayi says:

    He has become a phony bragger and loves to exploit himself and his family. Why hate the news people who chase them down when he himself is a media whore.

  169. Di says:

    Wow, what a nasty thing to say. Why are he and Jolie working so hard to rewrite history as if Aniston doesn’t exist? How would Angelina feel if Jon Voigt dismissed her mother in public like this?

    1. I think this is good that he is revealing what a jerk he is. I think it’s time for people to start Blaming Brad for the entire confict between Jolie and Aniston instead of blaming either of the women. He’s the one who lied to Aniston.

    2. I think people who leave their spouses have to work very hard to pretend that the relatinoship didn’t happen or didn’t matter so they can justify their betrayal and hide their regret.

    The fact that he and Jolie keep insulting Aniston makes me think their relatinship is vulnerable. Why are they so focused on her?

  170. Josephina says:

    Angelina has never said anything in an interview derogatory about Aniston. She has never responded in print nor interview to any of Jen’s snarky remarks. Angie loves Brad and gushes about how they met, how their love grows, their 6 children, and their family life.

    Any mention of loving Brad, the timing when it began, or any expression of motherhood and sharing that life with Brad seems to irritate Aniston and her fans. But,…Brad and their children is the focus of her life. Motherhood is above all else. This has been her life with Brad for 4 years now, raising and growing a family out of love. She is always asked about it FIRST in interviews, no one asks her about Aniston because interviewers already know what will start a conversation. If you are a fan of Aniston, then you want her to be shameful and remorseful of her relationship and shy away from the media. You probably want it to end. But it is not your call, is it? How Brad chose to leave his wife and how he currently expressed dissatisfaction with his life as her husband and not wanting kids with her is his business because it was HIS marriage to make work or let fail. We probably would not have heard any details about his “deadend” feelings had Aniston not characterized his current love as “uncool.” Angie is his woman, and he will defend her, even if it includes insulting Aniston.

    Aniston has admitted that “hearts mend” in interview. We have all had our hearts broken before. Attacking the new woman is misplaced anger and a waste of time.

  171. psychokitten78 says:

    Wow, I didn’t read all the comments but wow. For those who have seen the movie, I can see how even working on this project would really cause one to take stock and think about their life. It’s an amazing film.

    As far as AJ trying to ‘use’ him to repair her image, sorry but he’s never come off as the type to just say what others want to be said. He seems very much to be speaking from the heart. It happens.

    As far as saying his life was a dead end, hell I can relate. Now obviously I haven’t led the life of Hollywood elite…but when you are with a person who is wrong for you…it can definitely feel that way. I was married for 7 years and trust me..it was a DEAD END. Do I blame him? No. Do I harbor ill will towards him? No.

    We were not right for each other in ANY way and other than having two amazing beautiful children together and learning a lot about relationships…nothing great came out of the relationship for me. I’m sure we will always care for each other in a way that we have two beautiful and wonderful kids, and we don’t want to see bad things for the other person…but that’s about it. He found someone that is a far better match than I ever was and vice versa. We are both very happy with the person we are with now and much happier than we were together. So yes…our relationship was a DEAD END.

    However, even with that…who says he was necessarily referring specifically to her. People find themselves all of the time living a life that’s not leading towards fulfillment. It can be a mixture of a relationship, career, and even just your outlook on things; Then one day you wake up.

    I don’t know, I see a lot of people always wanting to bash these two. For one, no one knows what was going on in the marriage before that movie, things could have been completely in the tank (hell people were shocked that my marriage wasn’t the happy fairy tale everyone thought it was..b/c we were good at playing a part around others). So you just don’t know.

  172. Karlie says:

    I agree with Brad here. Aniston’s life seems to revolve around her movies, tanning on beaches, and hanging out with the Arquettes. She even ridiculed his interest in architecture. Sorry, but is Brad supposed to put up with that forever? They both have different interests and have moved on. I wish all their fans would do the same!

  173. Soothsayer Jr. says:

    Well, although Brad boy is getting rave reviews for Benjamin Button, unfortunately, he will not get an Oscar for his performance.

    David Fincher is a fine and talented director. I agree with him wholeheartedly that Brad isn’t the best actor out there, but he has evolved. If you’ve ever seen some of Brad’s movies from back in the day, you’ll agree that he sucked. Brad is not as versatile as say, Johnny Depp. Every movie Brad acts in is just like the other. Furthermore, his WORST performance was doing a cheesy British accent in “Snatch”. He really ought to take acting lessons from Cate Blanchett — now SHE is a fine performer.

  174. LoL says:

    I love How EVERYTHING even Brad calling his past life with his ex a dead end is blamed on Angelina. It is hard for people to believe Brad because of the way they manipulated the press when he was promoting oceans 12 and the godawful Troy. He is one of the best media manipulators in Hollywood but like bundy women find him charming and so he gets away with using his exes to further his career. Without Julliet he would be nowhere.

    He’s also said way more about Angelina over the years to overseas media because he knows The US media would ignore it and continue to beat up Angelina in the press. Just watch some of his overseas interviews on youtube… a year before Angelina talked about “falling in love” he said his fave movie was MR and MRS smith because it changed his life… the American Media/tabs ignored it.

    BTW, he’s a stiff actor…he should be on soap operas.

  175. LoL says:

    Soothsayer, that’s the biggest problem I have with Brad’s acting… he has not grown AT ALL. his acting does not get better. the worst part of button for me was Brad’s acting. It would have been much better with someone else.

    Soothsayer, I think his worst by far was TROY… he was cheesy in snatch, too.

  176. video games says:

    Some truly interesting details you have written. Assisted me a lot, just what I was searching for : D.