“No one wants to buy Ace Knute Johnson’s first baby photos” links

No one cares enough to buy Ace Knute Johnson’s baby photos. [Amy Grindhouse]
The Artist Known As Franco is working with Kate Hudson. [I'm Not Obsessed]
Eva Longoria wears orange, sort of pulls it off. [Celebslam]
North Kardashian is already giggling. [Reality Tea]
Lindsay Lohan turned 27 years old today. Sigh. [IDLYITW]
Mitt Romney’s family didn’t think he should run. Too late! [Gawker]
Fox News analyst: The GOP should just focus on white people. [Bossip]
Pink made a song with Lily Allen-Cooper. [PopBytes]
I hate to admit it, but I watched Under the Dome and I loved it. [Seriously OMG WTF]
Mick Jagger’s rock star lifestyle isn’t very intellectually stimulating. [The Frisky]
Gurl, what are you wearing?! [OMG Blog]
Here’s the rest of Kate Upton’s Vogue Brazil shoot. [Yeeeah]
Check out Lady Gaga’s crazy penthouse rental. [Life & Style]
Christian Bale really is done with Batman. [The Loop]
This woman looks nothing like Anna Nicole Smith. [Limelife]
Twinkies are coming back! Ho Hos are coming back! [Hollywood Rag]

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

71 Responses to ““No one wants to buy Ace Knute Johnson’s first baby photos” links”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Tiffany27 says:

    Doesn’t the GOP already only focus on white people? I’m confused.

    • doofus says:

      lmao…yeah, that was my take, too.

      it cracks me up…all the talk from the GOP and the conservative commentators immediately after the election about how the GOP needs to “re-brand” and change their stance on things…

      …and then the news is all about their recent (continued) forays into women’s reproductive health and choices, and a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.

      I guess they still haven’t realized that people want politics OUT of their bedroom and OUT of their health decisions.

      • lucy2 says:

        Exactly – every time they lose a major election, there’s all this talk about reaching out and trying to be more inclusive, but then it goes right back to the same thing.

        And for someone who didn’t want to be POTUS, Romney sure kept trying. When I don’t want to do something, I don’t do it.

      • L.S. says:

        I agree. Except, I’d like to add that I’d also like Obamacare out of my health decisions, too. I don’t like either side.

      • Isabelle says:

        The only thing that may teach them a lesson is to vote them out of state offices in 2014. They’re too thick headed to see why we didn’t vote for them in 2012. They believe its due to Obama ‘bots’ versus a message against them. Voting them out in 2014 will be a clear message to them. Our state elections are just as important as the Presidential election.

    • Ag says:

      seriously. it’s a given. it’d be news if they didn’t focus on the white rich (or those whites who aren’t rich, yet feel like “their” country is slipping away due to us women, immigrants, non-white, you name “the other”).

    • epiphany says:

      Sure, unlike all those selfless, altruistic Democrats like the Obamas, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, who never travel in private jets, don’t live in opulent mansions, hang out with poor people while handing out fistfuls of their own money #GETAFREAKINGCLUE

  2. Raquel says:

    I’ll take the headline a step further: no one really cares that much when a celeb reproduces.

  3. Aria says:

    Personally, I’ve been getting tired of the celebrity baby magazine covers for a long time. I love looking at the pictures of cute babies, but will never go out of my way to buy a magazine just for the fact.

    I think others feel the same way because it’s always the same thing in every single baby magazine cover. Celeb talks about how hard/easy/emotionally empowering pregnancy was, how blessed/connected they felt when they gave birth, how hands-on/loving the dad is, and how wonderful/sleepohsowell/precious the baby is. There’s nothing new under the sun.

    The whole pregnancy/baby cover thing is getting old and fast.

    • Barhey says:

      Haha, you nailed the language completely. I like babies too but there is nothing more boring than a celebrity mom talking about their special newborn.

    • Cece says:

      Agree! The worst is when the mags/gossip sites have to say that the perfectly average (or even slightly homely) baby/child is sooo beautiful and perfect and intelligent. (I still am embarrassed for Katie Holmes’ declaration that her obviously immature kid is such a “strong woman.”)

    • Becky1 says:

      Yes. I think it’s great that they have a healthy baby and I’m sure they and their family are overjoyed but I doubt that the vast majority of people are that interested. As Aria states, with celeb newborns it’s the same story again and again. Jessica and her boyfriend should enjoy their new baby privately instead of trying to pimp out pics.

  4. Moneypenny says:

    I noticed yesterday that by 4pm, Jess’ baby was already bumped from the first page on people.com. Congrats to them, but no, it isn’t really that interesting.

  5. Scarlett says:

    JS has been pregnant for what seems like two years. People are over it.

  6. IWantToLiveInNew York says:

    Mums out there can North Kardashian really be giggling already?

    And that is one pro Kardashian article, really playing up how wonderful and brilliant Kim is!

  7. wonderwoman21 says:

    Jessica Simpson isn’t interesting, this isn’t her first baby, and it feels as if she has been pregnant forever. Thus no one cares.

  8. dorothy says:

    I think people are just tired of the the whole celebrity baby thing anyway. I really don’t see the big deal over Kardashians spawn.

    • Dawn says:

      This +1000. In fact whatever magazine put the Kardashian/West baby on their cover I promise here and now never ever to buy another and I will turn each and every magazine to the back cover while I’m at it. I am so sick of already too rich celebs thinking that their kid is SO SPECIAL media need to pay them huge amounts of money so all us little people can gaze upon them! Enough.

  9. Kim1 says:

    People only care about celebs firstborns.Kingston was on OK cover no cover for Zuma.Sean Preston got a People magazine cover no cover for Jayden.Same for Brook Sheilds daughters ,Nicole Richie,etc

  10. Ag says:

    those pics of jessica’s baby are super cute. but i’d never buy a magazine to look at them.

  11. Tricia says:

    Honestly, I’d much rather see pictures of Jessica’s baby than Kim’s. I don’t get her appeal. At all. Ugh.

    But my main reason for commenting is to say OMG! to that picture of Maxwell in sunglasses!!! So cute I want to squeeze her!

  12. Qwerty says:

    Srsly- little maxwell is insanely adorable.

  13. Sunnyjyl says:

    Her little girl is gorgeous!!! I’m guessing baby Ace is also. I’d pay, but I am a sucker for babies.

  14. The Original G says:

    Babies are out of style.

  15. Bridget says:

    I forgot how unflattering that picture of Jessica was.

    I’m not into celebrity baby covers, especially since newborns are inherently boring. They eat, sleep and poop, and the parents talk about how overjoyed they are. Blah. Same as the whole Body After Baby covers… now, if one of them actually had to do all of this with no nannies, nurses, cooks, trainers, or the like, then I would be interested in reading that story.

  16. anon says:

    Now to be honest with facts is hard but the truth is. Jess photos sold with in the limits of everyone else. Check it out. Baby pics don’t and have not sold well in years but its easier to just say no one is interested .. Think how many babies are to be born next and know full well they will receive the same limited interest. The tabloid and blogs saturate everything kardashin wether you want it or not.. Someone’s getting a cut somewhere. Just a little tidbit. If anyone is paying attention is infact that Jessica herself with buying her new house and stepping bak has had every intention if staying a lot more down low. With her family. Her home owns a gym recording studio home theatre etc and extremely private.. That says more then the baby pics and no interest

    • t says:

      Jessica’s baby cover didn’t sell within the range of other celebrity baby covers. It didn’t even sell within the range of an average week. People Magazine lost money on it, a whole lot of money if you believe the rumor that they paid for the pictures. http://tinyurl.com/cl9tl6c

      Jessica’s cover was dead last. With the exception of Christina Applegate, she wasn’t even a close second place compared to these recent celebrity covers:

      * Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston (baby Tripp) outsold Jessica by 26%

      * John Travolta and Kelly Preston (baby Benjamin) outsold Jessica by 26%

      * Bethenny Frankel and Jason Hoppy (baby Brynn) outsold Jessica by 36.8%

      * Patrick Dempsey and Jillian Fink (babies Darby and Sullivan) outsold Jessica by 36.8%

      *Christina Aguilera and Jordan Bratman (baby Max) outsold Jessica by 47%

      *Jody Sweetin (baby Zoie Herpin) outsold Jessica by 57.8%

      *Marcia Cross and Tom Mahoney (babies Eden and Savannah) outsold Jessica by 78.9%

      *Nicole Richie and Joel Madden (baby Harlow) outsold Jessica by 78.9%
      *Even Nicole Richie’s second baby, Sparrow, outsold Jessica by .2%

      *Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony (babies Max and Emme) outsold Jessica by 110%

      *Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie (baby Shiloh) outsold Jessica by 131%

      *Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie (twins) outsold Jessica by 194%

      *Christina Applegate (baby Sadie) outsold Jessica by 2.3%

      http://tinyurl.com/bdfxsec

  17. Jen says:

    Not sure why any magazine would pay for photos of celebrity babies, especially since most put their children on social media ad nauseum (including Simpson) and KK puts herself on social media, so who would pay for a magazine when they put stuff out for free.

    The Royal baby will have official photos that everyone prints, so that is not an issue

  18. DreamyK says:

    Lets hope LiLo doesn’t make the 27 Club this year. She says she’s going to go far away from the spotlight, but I doubt it. She likes having fun, getting comped, calling up the Paps to make a quick $500 or whatever.

  19. CC says:

    I was much prettier as a newborn than Jessica’s kid, why would I pay for pictures of her and her kid? She’s irrelevant and the baby isn’t even that attractive, and judging by that, there’s a high possibility her second kid isn’t attractive either.

  20. Psyren says:

    I forgot she was even pregnant. She was pregnant for what? Two, three years this time?

  21. anon says:

    To say someone is irrelevant means irrelevant in your world and not others. You have to feel bad for many celebrities right now as they pretty much don’t exist in the tabloid world or blogs. It’s all K’s everywhere & true manipulation in the higest form. Good or bad and its kinda sad actually. This will go on for years and years and that is mind boggling.

  22. Alexandra says:

    That just seems so sad – I wish the media wouldn’t say things like that – if I was Jessica that would make me very depressed!

  23. lisa says:

    im sure it looks like the first one

    and they all kind of look like winston churchill anyway

  24. Anne says:

    Celebrating illegitimate children-

  25. Meggin says:

    I still find it ridiculous that they make that much money off baby pictures. It’s like yes the kids are cute but come on.. A lot of other non celebrity kids are too! Lol

  26. Sabrine says:

    Ace Johnson is not the best name. Already some of the sites are calling him “A-1 Peni*” ….they could have come up with something a lot better than “Ace”

  27. Jessica says:

    The only way I would look at new pictures of Jessica’s baby is if she was still with Nick.

    Her loser boyfriend is not famous and Jessica is just not that popular and attractive as she was in 2003.

    I am looking forward to Will & Kate’s baby and I’m a tad curious about Kim & Kanye’s child as well.

    JMO

  28. Jessica says:

    The only way I would look at new pictures of Jessica’s baby is if she was still with Nick.

    Her loser boyfriend is not famous and Jessica is just not that popular and attractive as she was in 2003.

    I am looking forward to Will & Kate’s baby and I’m a tad curious about Kim & Kanye’s child as well.

    JMO