Jennifer Aniston seen out with another guy

late show 2 171208

Jennifer Aniston may – may – have finally wised up and gotten rid of John Mayer. I am not an Aniston hater or lover, so there’s no secret anti/pro Brangelina agenda going on here. But I was never a fan of Jen dating John Mayer. His reputation makes it fairly clear that he was probably just wasting her time. It would have been cute if somehow Jen had been the one to change him, but I really don’t think Mayer can be changed.

Jen was spotted out last night with a very handsome gentleman, that according to Ted Casablanca at E!, is a much better looking guy than John Mayer. And it appeared they were on a date from the man’s body language, though he could have just been Jennifer’s colleague. Nonetheless, I’m excited at the potential.

Jennifer Aniston was surely looking as if she was doing something, or someone, naughty last night at Chateau Marmont. An utterly radiant, glowing, just-washed-that-hanger-on-stinky-pop-star-outta-my-fabulously-coiffed hair Jen was dashing down to the valet last night giggling. Of course, the garage was closed to the common folk, but eager parking peeps couldn’t wait to service the gal Brad got tired of servicing all those years ago.

But it wasn’t Jen’s preferential treatment that had folks gabbing, but her companion:

J.A. was “absolutely radiant and ravishing” as she held tight to her man-date, exiting the posh bad-girl’s hang for babes like Sienna and Lindsay. And he wasn’t one of her gay pals or John Mayer, thong-wearer and dubious starlet escort. Nope, the guy in questions was a taller, darker and handsomer babe who held his honey tight, protected and away from peeping eyeballs like yours and mine.

In fact, we’re assured the mystery man is mucho miles ahead of Mayer in the looks department, so maybe there’s hope for Ms. A. one-upping that bitch Angie, after all, let’s pray, OK?

[From E!’s The Awful Truth]

The only sorta-questionable thing about the guy is that Casablanca says he was wearing makeup. He emphasizes again that the gentleman is not one of Jen’s gay friends, but there was makeup, nonetheless. He didn’t specify what it was, and to me that makes a difference. I mean are we talking guyliner or rouge? Or a full out Mac face? Jen’s people didn’t respond to requests for the guy’s name or relationship to the actress.

It’s been a month since Jennifer and John Mayer were photographed together. That’s a considerable amount of time. A lot of people speculated that the pair only rekindled their relationship for the “Marley and Me” publicity. If so, it worked fairly well, though people track Jen’s love life with an obsessive zeal no matter who she’s dating. Overall, it’s not totally safe to say their relationship is over, but I’m hopeful Jen’s moved on to better dudes.

Here’s Jennifer outside the Ed Sullivan Theatre for the ‘Late Show With David Letterman’ in New York City on December 17th. Images thanks to WENN.

late show 2 171208

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

50 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston seen out with another guy”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. california angel says:

    guyliner or rouge? lol! After reading all the comments about jen and brad smoking it up back in the day from the article referring to brad’s past pot use, I can’t help but think she looks stoned here. hehe.

  2. Anoneemouse says:

    Maybe she was giggling because he was wearing makeup.

  3. Sickitten says:

    Of course she’s gonna dump John after she just used him to promote her movie. She never forgot Brad’s betrayals, do you think she is not gonna forget John’s betrayals? She needs another shallow person who is going to love her for when they find out how boring she really is. She’s so rich, she’ll be fine.

  4. jacquie says:

    Is it just me, or did she shorten that dress with scotch tape?

  5. Eka Allen says:

    @ jacquie – I’d say yep she did

  6. Kaiser says:

    Yep, she was probably out with someone – she’s got a film to promote in a few weeks, and Mayer doesn’t photograph well.

  7. so what says:

    Where is the pic of the guy????

  8. jess says:

    maybe i’m blind, but i see no reference to the guy wearing makeup in this post. is it in the full post on e! or something?

  9. Lizzy says:

    Yup, that’s the only reason she’s ever seen out in public. To promote movies. Really, God, she should just stay in her house where she belongs!

  10. Lizzy says:

    And that’s also why, for her last film, she was NEVER seen out with John Mayer. Makes perfect sense to me.

  11. Destiny says:

    Jaybird it’s not true it’s been a month since they have been photographed together. A quick search on Just Jared shows some long lens shots of them on New Years Day in Cabo. If you are talking about together as in leaving a restaurant in L.A. no there hasn’t been any in the past two weeks even though they have been snapped in L.A. at different places.John said on the radio before Christmas he was going away to work on his album this month.

  12. truth-SF says:

    It’s a known fact in hollyweird that Jen’s had a longtime boyfriend since her Brad breakup. But her sick publicist Huvane set hr up with V. Vaughn, Paul S. and John Mayer for movie publicity and to compete with her Ex at the box office, while they help her real guy get his acting career on track behind the scene. They are suppose to go public soon, so this guy may very wll be her secret boyfriend. I understand how she feels no one should try to snoop in her private life. But letting her publicist help her lie to her fans is kind of a low blow to them, if you ask me.

  13. anastasiabeaverhausen says:

    God, even the gossip about this woman is boring.

  14. Zoe says:

    if what anastasia is sayin’ is true re: JM being a publicity stunt relationship to keep our interest in JA (which I hear from my hollywood peeps, happens pretty frequently) then maybe the guy is the real thing and was wearing a bit of left-over stage make-up from “building up his career” or maybe it’s a little joke about him wearing HER make-up (like lip stick from kissing). Is that too generous?

    If it’s true that she’s just manipulating her image, then that sucks, but it’s kind of what we deserve, don’t ya think?

    I’ve never bought JM and JA as a couple, sorry to say, as much as I think he can be a douche, but he’s just too smart for her.

    Wish her the best tho…

  15. Robbie says:

    This pix is from when she was on the Letterman show for marley and me in December. TedC at E!started this lie with this pix. There are new pixs from the other nite and Jen is with jennifer meyer who is married to Toby McGuire after dinner out in LA on X-17. I don’t believe she and JohnM are for real and they are a PR stunt in my opinion for movie promotion, but this complete lie using the above pix from TedC is rediculous and easily disproved. TedC is a totally worthless gossip who makes up everything he writes, Marc Malkin is the E! gossip who sometimes gets things right.

  16. diddy says:

    the guy was probably one of her bodyguard she has some hot looking ones

  17. diddy says:

    and according to the insider(tv show) she was on a girls night out with drew barrymore and three other women. she wasnt on a date with any person so am thinking ted is mistaking her bodyguard for a date and the’ protecting and sheilding her away’ seems like the job of a bodyguard.

  18. bebe says:

    aniston was on a girls night out with drew barrymore and some other ladies

    Which A-list star was Jennifer Aniston spotted enjoying dinner with?

    http://www.theinsider.com/news/1540905_Lara_Samantha_Fire_Up_The_Gossip

  19. Faye says:

    Jennifer is definatly not a top notch actress, have never seen her in a movie that made me remember her intensly..she is very beautiful though and hope she has a few hot men in her life til she finds the one she can settle down and have a family with if that even happens or if that’s even what she wants. She needs to change somehow as an actress take on some important roles not just these petty little comedies..I want to see her in something moving..Is she even capable of that though?? Believe it when I see it 🙂

  20. Nan says:

    At least she’s not DELIBERATELY getting pregnant to try and trap a man like other women. When you have to get preggers to keep a man with you, it never lasts. Good for Jen on making sure she finds the RIGHT guy this time instead of a cheating loser.

  21. Cheyenne says:

    Anything from Turd Casablanca should be taken with a whole bushel of salt, never mind a grain.

  22. SixxKitty says:

    I hope she has ditched that loser and grown a brain, he’s made of stuff that splatters!

  23. yourself says:

    For thos ewho are bored, please keep away from the thread.

    I am keeping my fingers crossed that this is true. I am no Mayer fan either. But I have grown to like Jen quite a lot in the last couple of years. I find myself wishing her well.

  24. debra77 says:

    Regarding the comment about “other women” getting pregnant to trap men.. You must not get out much.. A baby(ies) does not keep a man with you.. Talk to the women who have children with their husbands or boyfriends, and he still walked. Grow up.. a man stays with a woman because he wants to.. children or not. If Jennifer wants or wanted to be a mother she would have done so by now. There is nothing wrong with saying that you do not want children. If she had courage she would go ahead and adopt or get pregnant. I think she won’t adopt because she does not want to be compared to Angelina. I hope that is not the case. Look at Meg Ryan… she wanted another child and adopted.. Many women do so every day. As far as Jennifer and John are concerned. It is difficult to see them as this “Great Couple”. But maybe it will work.. time will tell all.

  25. yourself says:

    Debra, why do you want to lead her life for her? She could have had a child with that loser Brad Pitt but didn’t he say that he did not want children till he met Jolie? Who also did not want bio children till she met him? Me thinks he is a liar. Didn’t he say on Oprah that he could not wait for little Jens to come? If he did not want children with her, why throw her under the bus for being a self centred b itch who did not want children when her husband wanted them badly?

    Now let him have kids with a mental illness gene fromt heir mother. Karma much?

  26. Kristen says:

    @ Yourself ~

    You talking about karma….. that’s laughable. Sounds like your the one who wants to lead her life – NOT DEBRA!

    karma much? NO
    hypocrite much? yes

  27. nina says:

    I know women who “accidentally” got pregnant at pivotal points in a relationship and it prevented the men from leaving. Some of these men, including my cousin, eventually left (1-5- years later), and some did not. I agree – the strategy is dumb, and without guarantee of success. Nevertheless, it is still being practiced quite often.

  28. vdantev says:

    *Insert lengthy rant about people who misunderstand Karma here*

  29. Faye says:

    Debrah77—–r u sure you are not getting paid for sticking up for these pathetic unstable people?? She did have kids to trap Brad… you think he can just walk away with 6 kids there…NO>> of course it would be more difficult to leave her like all the other men in her life..Not many can stand her, probebly deep down not even Brad!! She has more haters, than lovers..that’s forsure!! Let’s drag all 6 kids to Britian now…GREAT idea!!

  30. Cheyenne says:

    The haters are cracking me up.

    When Brad left Aniston for Angelina, it was “They’ll break up within six months, tick-tock, tock-tock.”

    Six months later it was “They’ll break up after the awards season, tick-tock, tick-tock.”

    When Angie was pregnant with Shiloh it was “They’ll break up right after the kid is born, tick-tock, tick-tock.”

    A year later it was “Those two are so ooooover…”

    A year later it was “They won’t last the year out…”

    And now, four years and six children later, it’s “Of course they won’t break up! Brad couldn’t leave if he wanted to! Angelina trapped him and he’s stuck with all those kids!”

    🙄

  31. spiceee says:

    lol @ Cheyenne

  32. minx says:

    Cheyenne, your comment made me laugh out loud! So true, the haters will always find a reason why Brad is with Angie, except the obvious: he’s in love with her and loves their kids. I don’t recall her getting pregnant when they started dating “to trap Brad”. As to Brad wanting kids with Jen, he was VERY clear about it in every interview, even teared up about it to Diane Sawyer. Jennifer lied about wanting kids, it’s obvious she never did and her career was always more important than her marriage. NOthing wrong about not wanting kids, btw, just don’t lie about it to your spouse.

  33. Josephina says:

    Faye and Nina-

    Angie had kids to keep Brad?

    Have you forgotten that she ALREADY was a mom with Maddox when Brad met her, that that was what attracted Brad to Angie? Secondly, Brad went with Angie to Africa adopt a SECOND child, an almost near death black baby girl, who was later named Zahara, remember? If Brad wanted to bolt, he had more reasons and opportunity to do so with the first two adopted children. Then he adopted them and Maddox and Zahara’s last names changed to Jolie-Pitt. The rest of the children are just part of their plan and history.

    There is little room for doubt that Brad and Angie love parenthood. It is what they both wanted individually and they are LUCKY, or blessed, to find within each other mutual goals about family life. Their desire to have and raise children is authentic. Their story stands above others because you do not see people wanting and having large families anymore. The average family has 2-3 kids. How many families do you know, in which the parents are less than 45 yrs. old, that have 4 or more children (excluding stepchildren) and are still together?

  34. Susan says:

    Well I see the Brad/Angie fans once again can’t help themselves from posting on a Jennifer post. Really sad guys. As for Jen she could date a garbage man and the whole world would be crazy with the news! Who knows what she has up her sleeve – but whatever she is so private that it is difficult to get pictures of her when not promoting a movie. Whatever is happening you can be sure that Jen is living a very fun filled life with friends. She will find the right man yet. Obviously she hasn’t found the right man yet to have a child with. Good for her. Women should be picky.

  35. Susan says:

    Oh and I would be smiling to if I had millions in the bank, the number 1 movie for two weeks in a row, tons of friends, etc. Jennifer has a great life. And what is with people who go over and over the past. Really guys move on, Jen has, you should to.

  36. Cheyenne says:

    *spitting out Pepsi all over keyboard*

    “PRIVATE?!!?”

    “Difficult to get pics of her when she is not promoting a movie?!”

    Then where did all those photos of her in the tabloids for the last four years come from? You know, the ones of her and Vince, her and Sculfor, her and Mayer, her pushing Smartwater, her laying around in Cabo in her two-sizes-too-small bikini, her leaving Ivy, for Pete’s sake, where you only go if you want a hord of paparazzi stalking you? Until the end of 2008, she hasn’t had any movies to promote.

    This woman is about is “private” as a five-alarm fire.

  37. Susan says:

    There is not one picture of her with Sculfor. I know there isn’t but if you think there is please post the link. You won’t because there isn’t one but you can try. Also very few of her and Vince and again very few of her and Mayer. They do not even walk the red carpet together on purpose so people cannot get pictures. Also very few in Cabo. The paps were desperate and many flew there to get pictures but not one good one of her and Mayer. Jen is very private – good pictures of her are rare. and as for tabloid pictures they used old ones mostly. I know it hurts to admit it. But jen is pirvate very few pictures of her except that her home or court’s home. With in my opinion should not be allowed.

  38. Susan says:

    sorry an addition. This post says it all. One of the most famous people in the world with paps camping out at her house and following her around and yet no pictures in a month with John. Now how private is that? And as for the Ivy she went there on business for a friend. If you are going to continue in your jealous rants at least get the facts straight. I’m not sure why you post here anyway. what do you really care about jennifer? You are not a fan obviously so why even spend the engery?

  39. Judy says:

    How do you or anyone else know why Jen was anywhere?? OMG I cannot believe people who think because they read the rag mags and read all articles on this person that they “know her: perosnally LOL She wouldnt give you fans a second look unless there was someone with a camera standing there. How the hell can people “love” someone they never met, never will meet roflmao. People sound like love sick loonies. She is an actress who at her age wears her damn dresses too short and has one affair after another lol Brad didnt damage her, she damaged herself. He didnt make her run after one guy after another, she did it and if she wants kids at her age she is nuts. She cold never keep up with raising a kid by herself and lead the life she leads without at least 3 nanies. Who made her a saint?? She is a woman who is not tgoing to settle down and raise a family because she doesnt want to lol Havign kids is not something all women want. She wants a B career and a big house and tons of suitors..let her have them.

  40. Susan says:

    Judy – calm down honey -it’s OK. Your obvious hate for Jen is sad and pathetic. Jen has more than a B career remember her movie was number 1 for two weeks. Infact her last two movies have been over 100 million! That is more than B career. And since when do 40 year olds have to wear a certain length of dress? And how exactly do you know she has affairs one after the other? Oh right from the tabloids. YOu really should quit reading those. Not good for a person. And about the kids – does that mean that men of over 40 don’t have the energy to raise children either? And please stop mentioning Brad in the same breath as Jen. They are over long ago. YOu really need to move on.

  41. Cheyenne says:

    Oh good heavens, please don’t make the mistake of equating box office with quality. Some of the lousiest movies ever made have been among the most lucrative ever made.

    Aniston is a B-list actor whose career is sliding downhill at an accelerating rate. The only kind of roles she can play are the kind which the studios will give to Anne Hathaway or Katherine Heigl instead of her: both much younger, both much more attractive, and both much better rom-com actors. Aniston’s best bet is to go back to TV and maybe she can pick up a few roles in some sitcoms as somebody’s mother.

  42. Susan says:

    Cheyenne you really do make me laugh. Your hate like other posters here has really blinded you to the facts. Jen currently is hot box office property. Her career has never looked better – and she has her own production company as well. currently she is one of the best money maker females in hollywood. I am sure she will be on TV again. Jen, unlike some actors can do both TV and movies. If she is so B-list and has no career why is it that she gets the most posts here and on every web site, why is it that you continue to post on her? to funny the fact that she made so much money in Marley and Me and will have another hit in February must be eating you alive. Go take a rest honey. Obviously your mind is faling you thinking that Jen’s career is going downhill.

  43. Cheyenne says:

    That “hit” you are projecting in February was postponed not once, but twice, because advance word from preview audiences was that the movie stank.

    “Management” is being released in Iceland and Croatia, of all places, before it goes into very limited release in the U.S., and from there to DVD.

    “Traveling” still can’t find a distributor, after all these months.

    Her career has never looked better? I don’t see how it could look much worse.

  44. Josephina says:

    Julia Roberts, Sandra Bullock, Nicole Kidman, Renee Zellwegger, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Halle Berry,…

    Annette Bening, Susan Sarandon, Sally Fields, Meryl Streep, Michelle Pfeiffer,…

    Kate Winslet, Kate Beckinsale, Cate Blanchett,…

    Kate Hudson, Keira Knightley, Julia Styles, Anne Hathaway, Scarlet Johanssen,…

    Eva Mendes, Penelope Cruz, Jennifer Lopez,…

    (I left Angelina Jolie and Gwyneth Paltrow out of the lists on purpose.)

    Helen Mirren, Judy Dench, Jane Fonda,…

    So… there are people in this blog that think Jennifer Aniston could be amongst ANY of these true movie stars? All of the above have at least starred in a movie or carried a movie solely on their name and ACHIEVED success in doing so. Almost all of them have been nominated or have won an award in a movie. These are some of the A-List actresses that are known world-wide.

    I believe Aniston is a great, TV actress and an up and coming movie star. She currently does not fit in with any of the above groups, and that’s OK. If her true passion is to become a movie star and she is committed to reaching this goal, above marriage and parenthood, then I believe she will have it.

  45. Susan says:

    She is not up and coming she has arrived! She has four movies out this year. And the first one was number 1 for two weeks. Watch He’s just not that into you will make loads of money too. Jennifer has arrived. I loved the above marriage and parenthood. Jen has years to get married and become a parent. Sheryl Crow adopted at 45. So jen still has 5 years. And as for marriage. I don’t even know if she wnats that. She said to People magazine sure maybe. Doesn’t sound like she is dying to get remarried. and by the way she fits into most of those lists just fine. give it up haters. Jen has arrived you are just to jealous to admit it.

  46. Cheyenne says:

    That “secret longtime boyfriend” rumor has been circulating for months and it is total bullshit. No celebrity would let herself be subjected to the ridicule Aniston has put up with over the past few years if she didn’t have to. What possible good could it do her or her career to be publicly derided as “dumped and desperate”, a “serial dumpee”, and a pathetic loser who can’t keep a man?

  47. Cheyenne says:

    Aniston made four movies last year, only one of which has been released. The score so far:

    1) Marley and Me — successfully released, #1 at the box office for two weeks.

    2) He’s Just Not That Into You — originally scheduled for release last June; postponed because the studio didn’t want to go head to head with Sex and the City. Re-scheduled for release in October, but the studio didn’t want to go head to head with either Changeling or Burn After Reading. Re-scheduled for release in February 2009. Audience reviews from preview screenings were dreadful, which may have been the real reason the movie’s release has been postponed twice.

    3) Management — bombed at the Toronto Film Festival and could not find a distributor for months. Imdb.com says release dates are as follows:
    Croatia 29 January 2009
    Iceland 24 April 2009
    Netherlands 7 May 2009
    Belgium 13 May 2009
    No word as to when it will be released in the U.S.

    4) Traveling — Imdb.com says release in U.S. sometime in 2009 but no date given. As far as is known, the film has not found a distributor.

  48. Anon says:

    Croatia? Doubt Jen even knows where that is.

  49. Susan says:

    Cheyenne: Desperate much? Funny how when Jen is such a B-list star you know her every movie and exactly when it is to be released. Obviously you follow her in great detail. You were the same one who a few weeks ago tried to say that Marley and Me was being pushed out and would not be released. And you don’t really know why He’ not that into you was pushed back. And audience reviews are actually very good on this movie. I read some. I don’t understand how you are so interested in someone who is so patethic (according to you). Obsessed? I would say so. don’t worry the movies you mentioned will do great. Jen now has her last 2 movies over 100 million in the US. Few female stars and say they do. Sure they have over 100 million but not back to back. But keep trying. It makes me laugh.

  50. Cheyenne says:

    Laugh at this, then:

    Angelina Jolie’s last four movies made over $1 billion dollars in the last twelve months.

    Aniston’s movies all together haven’t totaled $800 million in her entire career.

    Go to boxofficemojo.com and check it out for yourself.

    Your blind devotion to the patron saint of scorned women says more about you than you perhaps are aware.