Star magazine claims Brangelina’s twins are sick

starmagazine
Star magazine has another horrible story involving Brangelina’s children. According to the tabloid, twins Vivenne and Knox are very sick with mysterious ailments, and Angelina is very upset. Take this all with a grain of salt, considering last week’s Star cover story was about how Marc Anthony is violent towards Jennifer Lopez. It sounds like Star is simply leading the pack of overzealous tabloids clamoring for more photos of the twins, who haven’t been seen for months. New paparazzi photos of the twins would most likely go for a hefty price tag, but would be a bestseller for any tabloid.

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie debuted their twins, Knox and Vivienne, last August on magazine covers all over the world, but since one brief sighting last October, the 6-month-olds have mysteriously vanished from the public eye. Where are they? What’s going on?

In the Feb. 2 issue of Star — on sale today! — we report on the problems that have plagued the twins since birth — and there’s a long list of ailments. Their worried parents have done their best to protect the babies’ fragile health by keeping them tucked away.

“They haven’t been the healthiest babies,” says an insider of little Viv who weighed 5 lbs. at birth, and Knox, who was only 3 oz. heavier.

And because of their delicate states, Angelina has developed into an uptight mother.

“Angie is being neurotic with Knox and Viv,” says a source. “She won’t let anyone near them without sanitizing their hands and taking off their shoes.”

Adds another: “She’s really freaking out.”

From Star Magazine

I totally understand that Star has to make money, but I wish they would leave the kids out of their “reporting”. It’s not as if there are no juicy tabloid stories involving The Brange to come out in the past few weeks. Off the top of my head, I could create tabloid stories along the lines of “Angelina at war with Kate Winslet, Anne Hathaway!” or “Does Angelina Need A New Stylist?!?” Should Star magazine self-censor about children, or do these children-in-danger headlines really sell?

Thanks to Popbytes for the Star cover.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

57 Responses to “Star magazine claims Brangelina’s twins are sick”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. val says:

    I guess this charade will never stop. But you know what….they should sue the tabloids for this headline. I mean these people are going too far here, and Brad and Angelina should take this personal. I am sure their friends and family have seen this and contacted them. They are right to leave the babies out of the limelight for now. Shiloh did not get seen again until she was 9 months. For the sake of insanity, please leave their children alone!

  2. Susan says:

    Babies get sick – that’s mean of them to target those babies. I don’t care for Brangelina — but those are innocent babies.

    And, EVERY mother is uptight and neurotic!

  3. Me2 says:

    I’m no Brangelina fan, but I have to agree w/Kaiser, this kind of “insider” speculation is mean and hurtful. It’s more likely they don’t want to subject the itty-bitties to cold outdoor temps and hectic promotional travel.

    The photo ops usually only include three of the kids at a time, there will be plenty of pics of the twins when they’re older, or Brad’s family photos we be made available for the spread.

    I think they’re annoying, but I wish them no harm, and certainly no harm to two little babies.

  4. bros says:

    yah, i hate it when the mags go after women on what kind of mother they are. making up stuff about mysterious ailments and fragility and getting neurotic really hits below the belt, in my opinion-going after women about what kind of mother they are and insinuating that they are failures at one of the most fundamental things of life.

  5. viper says:

    AJ is a mess in general now. I think being amom to so many kids is just over welming and if it’s true that AJ has diabeities I would not be surprised if the twins might be needing extra attention.

    Aj right now looks even worse being so sickly thin I mean You literally see every bone in her body. She’s obviously under an amount of stress. But I don’t understand why it’s just her showing such signs and not Brad. I would imagine he must eb worried for all parties.

    But seriously guys, AJ is the sick one. What is happeni to her kids isnone of our business. They arent the ones voluteering for the spot light.

  6. Baholicious says:

    LOL, reports like this one from the Sun serve the purpose of setting this board afire with detractors saying how Angelina is not taking proper care of her kids (Hi Ned!)…that being said, she’s been busy galavanting and being all anorexic and whatnot on red carpets for her boyfriend’s movie. It’s not necessary for her to be at his premiers considering they have wee babies at home. People would certainly understand that – I hope.

  7. Jeane says:

    Since pictures of the messiah twins were sold for 15 million dollars, you can’t expect tabloids to not write about them. OBVIOUSLY they sell like hot tits.

  8. geronimo says:

    Think the cover itself tells us all we need to know about this ‘story’:
    Where Are the Twins? in front of a pic of the twins. Morons.

    Agree, Kaiser, crosses a definite line to make unsubstantiated claims about the health of two small babies. But I could also say, why then post the story and give these morons even more attention? Just saying, not having a go! *smile*

  9. viper says:

    True but they arent to blame for that. Their parents literaly sold their kids. Its discusting evenif the intention was noble, you don’t do that to you kids. Their freedom was taken away the day they were concieved. I do pity them for that, it’s an unnessesary act. The Depps never did ti and theirkids are florishing, we dont see them, their happy. These two, well they’re just nutts.

  10. Codzilla says:

    viper: You’re joking with all the bad spelling, right?

  11. bite me says:

    what? the tabs,doesn’t care about the chosen one anymore

  12. viper says:

    yeah sorry im in the dark and just woke up.

  13. viper says:

    Seriously redbull is an awesome drink. As soon as that is in my system I am good to go!

  14. DLR in Canada says:

    fascinating. i hope the stories aren’t true. i would think considering how outspoken brad and angelina are (remember the stories about pax peeing on the chair and shiloh telling people to call her joe?) they would admit whether the twins were ill? granted, angelina doesn’t look well. she’s back to her sticks and bones and veiny arms, but brad looks okay although that comment he made recently about not crying was really weird. they’re a weird family, but weirdness aside if the twins were sick i am sure someone would speak up somewhere.

  15. Ash says:

    Just another lame cover from a lame magazine.

  16. Sauronsarmy says:

    Where are twins: Does anybody really care? Besides the rapid/obsessive fans?

  17. Leighann says:

    I hope this story is not true; those kids have it rough enough as it is. The parents greatest mistake was consistantly inviting the paparazzi into their private family lives, now that the barn door was opened by the jolie/pitts themselves, i fear it will continue thru the children growing into adulthood….

  18. Mairead says:

    DLR – Shiloh was going through a “Call me John/Peter” phase because she was mad into Peter Pan.

  19. Mairead says:

    Oh and the story is utter wadscollop.

    As much as I’m missing the “edit” function, the typos that’re coming up are hilarious. I’m loving Sauron’s “rapid/obsessive fans”… they’re like normal fans, but must more brisk! teehee

    (btw, I’m not having a pop at you personally Sauron, it just made me giggle)

  20. Anon says:

    Baholicious (Hi Ned!)
    lol

  21. Kaiser says:

    G, are you calling me a ZOMG Hippocrat?!? No, I covered it because I knew there would more stories about it throughout the week, so I just decided to put my two cents in. Pre-emptive strike, I suppose.

  22. Whitey Fisk says:

    Did Star learn nothing from Suri Cruise?

  23. geronimo says:

    K – Correct! Nah, I knew you’d know what I mean! So the story actually has legs then?

  24. vdantev says:

    So freaking insane !! The kids are out of pap view for a few days, so they must be dying or something. So sick.

  25. texasmom says:

    Seems unlikely. But the “detailed” stuuf, if true, actually seems very common sense. If I had newborn twins, I’d be keeping them under wraps, and I’d want everyone to use hand sanitizer as well! Especially if I had 4 other young kids! 80% of the dirt in people’s homes comes from their shoes, we routinely take shoes off at the door, and we know many other families that do, too.

  26. anonymous says:

    For heavens sakes, why is Star mag yet again making such false accusations? Maybe to sell thier crappy magazines! Star is going in the pooper right where it should be. If you ever notice it’s always an inside source, yeah my a**.

  27. Me2 says:

    Hippocrat? Paging Dr. Kaiser!

    Looks like we all miss the “edit” feature. lol.

  28. geronimo says:

    @Me2 – No, not a typo. An illiterate poster spelt it like that ages back on some Jolie Pitt thread where he/she hissed and spit and frothed at the mouth over AJ, and we loved it so much, we kept it! Much funnier than hypocrite, don’t you think!

  29. Sauronsarmy says:

    Mairead: They do exist! Every celeb has them but Brangelina’s sacre me the most. Never go to justjared if you wanna keep your sanity.

  30. KDRockstar says:

    Oy. Note to self: be afraid of Brange boards. Doesn’t anyone see that magazines need to pay for the photos, and no one is reading mags anymore when you can get the info online for free.

    All of these celebs are going to have screwy headlines during the recession.

  31. Lizzy says:

    It’s definitely inappropriate for magazines to speculate about the health of any child. But it does open the question of whether putting the babies in the spot light in the first place was also inappropriate? Besides, isn’t it assumed by anyone who likes “The Brange” that they don’t care about the tabloids or even read them? When you make your children into a commodity by selling their pictures in the first place, this is the result.

  32. Zoe says:

    Viper; “Their parents literaly sold their kids.”

    gah, so sick of hearing this. it’s just (literally and figuratively) not true.

    and yeah, AJ isn’t looking very healthy these days… let the drug allegations begin…

  33. doodahs says:

    Damn, when I rescued newborn kittens, I made people use hand sanitizer before touching them…. don’t think it’s weird she is doing the sanitizer/take shoes off thing. Do think selling their baby photos to the world is in bad taste (not just Brange but from any celeb) because some things just create a chain of events. Celeb kids having any privacy in life after that kind if sensationalism has perhaps been compromised and that wasn’t the parents call. On the other hand, the media would camp out on their doorstep if they didn’t so it’s a tricky situation.

  34. aleach says:

    i dont know/care where the twins are or what they are doing but i think this is mostly Brangelina’s fault. they got themselves into this tabloid frenzy when they started selling their kid’s pictures for the cover of the mags.
    i just think its soooo strange when celebs do that…selling pictures of you KIDS to the public?? kinda creepy…

  35. Kristen says:

    I gotta go with Kaiser on this one too. Kids should be off limits…..as far as gossip and tabloids.

    Aleach – in case you missed it they did not sell their children to media for more coverage. They sold the pictures on their terms and that is their right for a very moble cause. It is their right to determine who the money for the pics should go to. They didn’t want some psycho paparazzi making money off their children. They wanted the money to do some good. I say bravo…. if a few pics makes millions for a charity then how can one criticize?

  36. Judy says:

    Do these rag mags have anything important to say or better yet do they know how to print the truth about anyone or anything?? AJ does not look like she has an eating disorder, she had enough brains not to act like a human garbage disposal and not eat herself into 200 pounds , so she lost her weight. They do not drag the babies out in the public so sue them lol I think they are good parents, probably better then we are , you dont see them on the web all day going to these sites and posting crap about them lol

  37. doodahs says:

    “you dont see them on the web all day going to these sites and posting crap about them lol”

    Not saying the Brange but some of the ‘celebs’ admit to trawling the sites to see what’s said about them and the ones that don’t, have people to do it (who sometimes post!). Media is spin and often, damage control happens in ‘staged’ outings to counteract the negative things being printed. Blogs are the new media and they get hits from the very people that are being written about. Perez Hilton has made a career out of it.

    PS Why the lack of edit facility?

  38. Kait says:

    Wasn’t there all kinds of speculation about Shiloh not being very public for the first year or so of her life? Maybe, like normal parents, they don’t have enough arms or energy to lug all the kids out places. Since the twins are littlest and would require the most work to take out in public and would care the least about being left behind, they aren’t wasting the energy.

    Besides, celebrities don’t owe it to us for us to see their kids. They released photos and now they are going on with their lives.

  39. Faye says:

    Why would parents ever release or sell private pics of their children..is different if tabloids get a pic, or something but really? both pitt and jolie are unstable and not responsible..maybe the kids should have some stability, they prob have slept in a 100 different beds..Regardless, IF the kids are sick that is awful and I hope the best for the children..kids get sick though all the time, is this sopposed to be a serious illness or just bullshit..

  40. Diva says:

    Do you honestly think the fascination with the kids would be any less had they NOT done the cover spread thing??? Seriously, if the first pictures of the twins hadn’t been made public, this very headline would have been emblazoned across every tabloid MONTHS ago.

    And then the “Ned”-brigade would be writing long rants about how Brad and Angelina aren’t showing their new kids because they are using them for the publicity of “where are they?”.

  41. NotBlonde says:

    I think it is ridiculous to speculate about the health of their children. it isn’t our business and it just seems creepy to be talking about someone else’ children to me. Especially if the stuff she is supposedly doing (taking off shoes in the house and using sanitizer) are really normal things that people do.

    By the way, I do, however, think it is weird that they would sell pictures of their babies to the tabloids. I don’t care how “noble” the cause might be, you are still selling your children to the media and that is strange to me. Maybe it’s a good thing I’m not a celebrity.

  42. elusive says:

    If Angelina is crazy for making people wash their hands before touching her twin babies during RSV, influenza, and gastro season, then sign me up for crazy. I’m a NICU nurse and if you dare kiss my babies on the face this time of year I might slap you. Babies, especially twins who are usually born slighly under developed, are more at risk to catch things, and get sicker from these illnesses.
    I think she appears to be a great parent. People want to dig at her for taking them places, and creating a worldly family. She is criticized for selling the photos of her childern and donating the proceeds to charity, rather than letting scheeming paps make money off of them. She is criticized for her relationship, she lack of sharing, her over sharing, her past, present and future. I agree she is interesting, and beautiful, and I love gossip as much as the rest, but this is craziness. If youve ever been through the adoption process you’d understand the expectations that she has to live up to to get these children – you would know she is a good mom and deceint person. You will never convince me she is a bad mom. I’m sure her children will have complaints when they are older, but no one is a perfect parent.

  43. Lizzy says:

    I honestly do Diva. There are a few high profile celebrities who recently had babies and never advertised it by selling photos for the cover of a magazine (Hallie Berry and Nicole Kidman are the first that pop into my mind). Sure, paps eventually get some crappy photos and then eventually more, but there isn’t all the hype or hysteria. As I said before, once you make your children a commodity (whether with noble intentions or not), you open the door for this kind of exposure, and while I do agree that Star is wrong for capitalizing on it, I think “The Brange” are equally responsible.

  44. Me2 says:

    @Geronimo:

    Thanks for the history lesson. “Hippocrat” is DEFINITELY funnier.

    *smiles*

  45. kate says:

    just because the babies are home means they’re sick? i’m not following the logic here.

  46. Cheyenne says:

    Oh Jesus, here we go again. The last time Star shouted SOMETHING IS WRONG WITH THE TWINS!! it turned out they had colic.

  47. newhere says:

    elusive:

    Do you think a non-celebrity without millions of dollars would have the same chance of being approved for an adoption if they had the same history? Like the admitted history of drug use, not being married, promiscuity, mental illness, etc? I think not. I’m sure you will argue that some of those things are disputed but all the same, I don’t think she had to live up to the average standard of being a decent person.

  48. DD says:

    how boring. an exclusive about nothing. Good for them for keeping their kids out of the spotlight, maybe they’re learning.

  49. elusive says:

    I doubt you’d like to be judged for things that happened in your past. Not married, promiscuous, mentally ill, drug addicts have kids all the time. Out of all 4 you listed I would only qualify one of them as valid. Who cares who she slept with when she was 20? I wouldnt want to be judged by that my whole life. Also, there are plenty of non married, ex married, gay ect ect people who make perfectly good parents. Marriage doesnt make you a parent. As for mental illness – well you’re just an ass if you think that makes you an incapable parent. Have you ever suffered with depression? Should Children’s aid come grab the kids of everone who has? Depression is a mental illness. If she’s bipolar that doesnt make her a bad person either. She is no longer making those choices, and if she is mentally I’ll it isnt showing up so much…except maybe in the form of an eating disorder. Your arguments are invalid. I agree that she probably greased the wheels of adoption in other counrties, but there is still some basic criteria she would have to meet. Also, the childern look happy, well adjusted, clean and well fed. Thats more than I can say of some people that I see every day.

  50. Leandra says:

    It’s just a bunch of BS. The tabs are desperate….obviously. All Brad and Angie are doing is keeping their children away from the vultures out there and who can blame them.

  51. Ned says:

    You keep moving babies from one hotel to another flight on a weekly basis, and you expect them to be fine?

    Some adults might find it exhausting, so what can you expect from a baby?

    You sell the pics and details of newborn and you make them into celebrities.
    They didn’t choose it and it was worng, but once they made them another product in their PR machine, there’s no stopping it.

    I feel bad for these children for having such self-centered parents.

  52. Kim says:

    Brangelina people planted this story to increase speculation so that they can sell another round of pictures for a hefty sum to finance their expensive lifestyle.

    Brad cannot move without a drink, that is not a sign of a man without problems. Whatever the situation, count on Angelina to mask it up and spread her ‘we are too happy to be true facade’. Wasn’t she running arround grinning from ear to ear when her mother lay dying only to start crying every time it suited her PR charade?

    Still children are innocent and the media should lay off them. Parents should protect their children by not pimping them to the highest bidder.

  53. Anaïs says:

    To sell the babies’s pictures have nothing to do with the tabloid cover.
    Violet Affleck got her pictures taken every single day, but her parent didn’t sell any picture of her.
    Julia Roberts sold her twin’s pictures but the paps never follow them.
    Star magizine and other tabloid make the most horrible stories about all the celebrity children lately, like: suri’s lonely life, where is Suri, Shiloh recieve death menace, Matilda’s life without a father, who is the cuttest Shiloh, Matilda, Violet and Suri, kingston the king of the playground.
    The sad true is that celebrity children sell, this is way the paps follow them everywhere, and make those horrible story about them.
    And the fault belong to you, so called fans and hater, because you jump on every occassion to bash the parents or tell people how amazing they are, or how cute the children are.
    Stop blaming the parent, because you are as guilty as them.
    Who buy those magazine? who look at the pics on the net? who are here to make a big discution about this most probably fake story?
    And stop acting like if you were the perfect parent of the perfect children, with the perfect life. You cannot apply your habit to those children, and say “i coudn’t put up with traveling so much, therefore the children are for sure suffering of it”, that ridiculous you don’t know them. You don’t have any idea about those children’s life.
    They have always move, so probably they are accustomed to this.
    And say that it better that the paps take the children’s picture instead of sell them is a bullshit, why should a strange take benefit of someone else child.
    I also would have prefer to sell my baby’s picture instead of let those horrible paps get the money, even if i wouldn’t have give it to charity. lol

  54. newhere says:

    elusive:

    Calm down. I didn’t say she was less of a parent or any of those things. I simply made the point that any average person with the same background would not have had such an easy time adopting. Therefore, the “expectations” she had to live up to in order to adopt were probably not as stringent as your post implies.

  55. Emily says:

    After the pics of Shiloh were published, Angelina and Brad kept her “hidden” away for most of her babyhood. We didn’t start seeing her regularly until she was over a year old. They’re little babies and don’t need paps rushing all over them for a picture!

  56. Blanche says:

    Maybe Brad and AJ are charging too much for the pictures.
    Greedy bastards.

  57. smooth chocolate says:

    People should not judge people because they are not living up to their expectations! Brad and angie selling their twins pics. Are no different from u posting yours on the web and or emailing them to any and everyone you know! You do not know where your kids pics. Are ending up! I think angelina is a great mom and unlike other celebs u always see her with her kids and they all look very well taken care of! Brad and angie are celebs in their own way they probably felt by releasing the pics of their twins they were sharing a small part of their kids with their fans.I feel society is in a real bad place any time its appropriate to take shots at some one kids! I would be outraged if I were the parents!