Emma Watson covers the October issue of Net-A-Porter’s The Edit magazine. She looks fantastic and finally like she’s coming into her own sense of style. It’s really nice to see a child star who hasn’t gone off the rails or ripped off her clothes to prove she’s all grown up. Of course nothing is wrong with nudity, but as with Miley Cyrus, nudity for the sake of attention isn’t the wisest move.
Some of the pieces Emma models here were designed by Livia Firth (wife to Colin), whose designs follow eco-conscious principles. Livia’s clothes are also ethically sourced in that they aren’t produced in sweatshops. The journalist here mentions how Emma is very charming, put-together, and grounded. She also showed up to the interview — gasp — early. Plus she sounds pretty intelligent here:
On supporting fair trade in fasshion: “I don’t do anything by halves,” she says, looking pared back and gamine in a gray and black blouse, high-waisted shorts and not a scrap of makeup. “I have to go all in. I just want things to be perfect. If I’m going to put my name on it, I want it to be something I love.”
Working with Livia Firth: “I was like, No one’s doing anything like this!’ It’s so exciting. I’ve always had this huge problem. I would love to wear garments that are ethically sourced, but there aren’t enough options for me to be able to do that realistically.” So when she met Firth, “it just seemed like [the project] was something I had to do, something I’d been waiting for. Livia’s created a lobbying body to put pressure on governments and corporations to encourage them to have [ethical responsibility] as their baseline. It’s quite awesome.”
She’s a conscious consumer: “Maybe there would be fewer problems if we were really conscious of where and how things were made. We don’t support slave labor in this country, so we shouldn’t support those conditions in other countries. I can’t wrap my head around why ethical clothing is a speciality and not a base standard. Why is it special to have something you know wasn’t made under terrible conditions by a 12-year-old girl for 20 pence an hour?” She pauses, looking slightly embarrassed. “It’s hard to talk about this stuff without sounding preachy.”
She seeks meaning in film too: She calls herself a “director chaser” and makes a concerted effort to work with “people who really have vision. It’s fun to help create something with someone who has a clear goal.”
Red carpets are painful: “Getting ready for an event can feel like a lot of pressure. You have to consider, ‘Will people see up my skirt? If a flash goes off, can you see through this?’ So I’ll do a test sitting, a test standing… It’s nerve-wracking. People really scrutinize. On the red carpet, I’m usually in so much discomfort – my shoes are uncomfortable, I can’t breathe in the dress. I don’t compromise like that in my everyday style.”
Who is she wearing at the interview? “I was worried you were going to do this! A lot of my clothes have been altered, so the tags are out, but I can tell you that I have Chloe flats on!”
[From Net-A-Porter’s The Edit]
Emma Watson is gonna be fine. More than fine. Remember that brief period of post-Potter madness when Emma seemed to waver between college and modelling contracts? People were so worried about her, but Emma has worked it out in her own time frame. She seems so articulate and mentions that many of her opinions on fashion were influenced by learning about fair trade in college. Did you pay attention to that stuff in school. I didn’t.
Emma looks gorgeous in this editorial, doesn’t she? The Edit does wonderful shoots.
Photos courtesy of The Edit
I love the navy blue(?) dress
She really looks good in this photoshoot and even more important, she sounds extremely inteligent and grounded. That is indeed refreshing. I hope she has a long lasting acting career(and I think she will).
Plus, nice that she is making ethical clothing a topic! This should get a lot more attention. Specially after all the garment factories that burned down killing a lot of workers(Bangladesh, Pakistan…)
She did a line for People Tree a few years ago too.
LOVE her – what she says, how she looks, how she comports herself. Just love, love, love. I hope she has a long and quality career in showbiz, but even if she doesnt, this kid will do good, and do it well.
I really like her, too. And I think she is beautiful. And I like what she says here.
But I can’t help thinking that she could take a real stand and stay away from freebie red carpet clothes from designers with dodgy ethics (and most of them have dodgy ethics). Be careful about saying you’re all in to something, Emma, when it would take only a few seconds to show that you aren’t. That’s all I’d say.
Sixer she does say that theres a supply problem. That she cant always find clothes that live up to this standard.
I know. I’m nitpicking a bit. But she could certainly avoid the worst of the worst on the red carpet: which she doesn’t.
@Sardinia
I think I read an article in Vogue in which Livia says she wears only/mostly ethical clothes (mostly from her line). If she can do it, Emma can too, I would think.
Well, lets put it this way – Chanel Couture isnt made in Bangladesh sweatshops.
On phone and about to go into meeting but wanted to show you guys this:
http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/buyersguides/clothing/designerclothing.aspx
I love her, too. I always will because of Harry Potter.
She looks beautiful and seems thoughtful and mature. I admire her stance on ethical clothing. Lovely.
Also glad to hear someone admit how uncomfortable those red carpet dresses and shoes really feel.
So I checked out some of Livia Firt’s stuff online.
An $770 dress, $260 straw and textile bag, $257 brass and resin necklace… yeah, I sure do wonder why that is a speciality.
Couture and upper-end design for places like Bergdorf and Nordstrom could handle the markup to be made ethically, though.
Most t-shirts and underwear and jeans for USA consumers used to be made in North Carolina and other textile states. I think I read somewhere that if Target and Wal-Mart brought all that manufacturing back to the States, we’d have to pay $15-20 for a t-shirt instead of $6-10, and we’d maybe have to imagine buying a shirt that lasted 2 years instead of 1 season before falling apart in the washing machine.
I would totally pay that premium if it meant that 12-year olds weren’t working 10-hour days in firetraps in Bangladesh.
Plus, having more textiles made here would actually get US workers jobs, and then there would be companies paying taxes again. Sending all the jobs overseas gave us better options as buyers, but as workers, we got screwed.
That’s a great post you wrote, Ellen.
I absolutely try to vote with my wallet and buy American made.
Also, these Livia Furth designs are so much prettier than the clunky clothes I’ve seen from her before.
You can already pay that premium – there are plenty of places that sell American made clothes. American Apparel even has an online store, so it doesn’t matter where you live (the t-shirts are $22). No need to wait for Target or Walmart to get on board.
I think a lot of folks think that would pony up the money, but passing up the clearance $1.99 tees at Target requires a really conscious decision, especially when the budget is tight.
The only real way to dress yourself ethically on a truly restricted budget is to go second hand/vintage and customise.
The problem isn’t just the textile factories in Carolina being closed, unfortunately a lot of them burned down. Undergarment, upholstery and rug factories used to be all over the Carolina’s and the state didn’t subsidize to help get them back up an running.
I would recommend reading the book Overdressed by Elizabeth Cline. She writes that sadly people are so addicted to fast fashion that they resist buying American-made clothes because they refuse to pay more for such clothes. Cline recommends we shop less and pay more for American-made clothing or clothing made in similar countries such as Canada or the UK. I write about her book here: http://totalbettymedia.com/2013/07/05/could-you-give-up-shopping-for-a-year/ By the way, Los Angeles is also a hotspot for the garment industry.
Overrated, bland boring, average looking, nerd exploiting, ‘huge star’.
“nerd exploiting”? what does that mean?
The potterheads, who view her as a ‘sex symbol’. How could you call the majority of them? In my case, nerds.
@ Anelise
How is that exploiting? That doesn’t even make sense.
And yet you came to read the article and comment.
I don’t like her because she can’t act and ruined on of my favourite HP characters.
She sounds/looks lovely but she’s still so boring to me, it’s crazy I used to be such a huge fan-girl of hers in the early HP days.
Explains why those dresses are familiar. I saw them in The Global fund event.
She’s a lovely girl… I love her black & white dress? Skirt & blouse? It’s refreshing how normal she is.
I like her. She seems grounded and intelligent. I hope she is able to stay true to that.
She’s beautiful and smart, love these interview tidbits. Although I think the headline is misleading…I thought it meant that she couldn’t even understand why ethical clothing even exists! Seems like “is a specialty” should say “isn’t standard practice” or something. Nitpicky, I know.
I thought the same thing when I read the headline.
I think Chinti & Parker make ethical clothing too. I have a few items from them. Their sweaters are very expensive but you can get decent deals when they are on sale.
Take notes Miley, this is how you do it
Gorgeous!!!
Young starlets (and not, cough Lilo) should learn from her. Emma’s fine and will be fine. I really like her attitude, and these picture were really good too.
I like her a lot. She looks a bit like a Slytherin in this photoshoot, no? 🙂
Net-a-Porter has become my favorite place to look at fashion, even over the glossy mags I use to love. I know they are trying to sell their merchandise, but the styling is so beautifully done.
Good for her for bringing up this issue.
I’ll admit that after the factory fire in India, I’m now more aware of where my clothes are constructed. I had to say good-bye to some of my cheap & cheerful favorites, like Old Navy, but I can’t buy that stuff anymore in good conscience.
Too bad she’s not doing a “budget” line 🙂
She seems like a nice girl and I’m happy for whatever success she obtains but I’m still not sure if she is going to be the great adult actress and star that the fans seem to think she is going to be. It’s doubtful to me for some reason.
Never saw the Potter films so maybe that’s why I don’t get this girl.
Also, at the risk of getting slammed here, I don’t find her very pretty.
That being said, this interview made me like her a bit more. Really loved what she said about being a conscious consumer.
I think people call her beautiful because she is young. She has really good skin, she’s cute–but she is very androgynous looking (her brother looks EXACTLY like her), but she has nothing else to back that up. She’s boring to me.
If she could act, then I’d be all for her. But I don’t think she can. I find it interesting that the only one who can act (Dan), is going out and doing the work–all she’s done is play as teenagers, although I heard she was good in Bling Ring.
Whether you’re beautiful or not, you need charisma. Cate Blanchett, Meryl Streep have oodles of that–it doesn’t always have to be sex based. I find Cate averagely attractive too, but she has such a spark, a look in her eye that makes her beautiful to me. Same with Meryl.
With Emma, I feel nothing–plus it seems like she feels the need to emphasize just how grounded she is, how she’s not going out and partying…..she doesn’t need to tell us her every move, so that we know she’s a good girl, just go out and DO IT.
Great interview, amazing photoshoot! I’m so glad neither she, Rupert nor Dan went off the rails. They could have totally done it, but never did. They will all be perfectly fine.
I love her. I think she has a unique delicate beauty. She looks very elegant in the black and white photos.
Love her
Lovely dresses i don’t get why she has her mouth open all the photos. really takes away from the shoot only good pic is the one with her back facing the camera
I like her. Very beautiful.
Why is she doing magazine covers when she has nothing to promote? She’s so completely overrated and her opinions on ethical fashion are negated when she wears exactly the opposite in real life.
A boring, poorly skilled and utterly unworthy of any kind of appraisal, talentless actress.
I would rather have Mia Wasikowska, Jennifer Lawrence, Elizabeth Olsen, Felicity Jones, Holliday Grainger, Juno Temple, Imogen Poots, Antonia Thomas, Anna Kendrick, Carey Mulligan, Rooney Mara, Emily Blunt, Emma Stone, Keira Knightley or any number of other actresses in their 20s gracing the screen with their presence.
Miss Watson is a poor representative. She’s also becoming very Gwyneth Paltrow-y
saw her once in real life (she was sat a the table next to me in a cafe) – BANGING BOD. Was super surprised at how pretty she was in really life, very natural and no (obvious) makeup.
Uuuummm i will take her over nost of the actresses her age…or a bit older.And people…give her a break.She played the same character for 10 years.It’s not like she got to exercise her act with dofferent roles.She gave by far the best performance in HP 7.1 and since then she keeps getting better.She was great in The Bling Ring and i’m hearing that she had the entire Noah set in tears with her heartbreaking performance.I think she is in the right path…after all,she does have little experience.
“Fasshion?” Someone’s been typing “Fassbender” for too long. 🙂
Luxury brands are not necessarily ethical because some of their product is made in Italy! The sentiment of the article is good but unfortunately quite naive about luxury fashion production.
For example, Burberry Prorsum may be made in Italy. However, the majority of their sales come from the other lines which are at least 50% produced in Asia.
Also, I find it hard to take advice from wealthy famous women who are able to persuade designers to make one off pieces ethically. This is a publicity stunt for these brands – not a change for the better.
If a real change is to be made in labour conditions they need to be lobbying the high street clothing market where the average person shops.