Did Adele turn down a £12 million offer from L’Oreal so she wouldn’t ‘sell out’?

adele1

I don’t want to sound too much like a consumerist lemming, but if Adele told me to buy something, I would probably but it. If she was trying to sell me an iPod, I would buy a new one. If she endorsed a car, I would definitely look into the details of that car. If she told me about a great new band, I would download the album. It’s something very particular about her – she has something very few celebrities and artists have. What is it? Authenticity? I guess that’s the word, but it just feels like I can take her at her word. I believe she’s an honest person and she conducts herself in the public sphere in an honest way.

All of that should mean that Adele is knee-deep in prospective endorsement/advertising deals, right? Wrong. She licenses her songs for a lot of commercials, TV shows and movies (but nearly every artist does that), but she’s not “the face” of any product. She just does her music. But people have taken notice. Like beauty behemoth L’Oreal. According to The Mail, L’Oreal offered Adele a £12 million to be the newest face of the brand. And Adele walked away!

She was on the verge of ousting Cheryl Cole as the face of L’Oreal, but Adele has reportedly stunned the French cosmetics brand by walking away from a lucrative deal worth £12 million. The 25-year-old Oscar-winner was said to be embroiled in negotiations regarding a potential contract that would’ve seen her join a L’Oreal celebrity stable that already includes Penelope Cruz, Eva Longoria and Jennifer Lopez.

But despite lengthy negotiations Adele reportedly turned her back on the offer, leaving the brand completely in the dark about her reason for backing out.

‘L’Oreal was in negotiations for the deal with Adele and it looked to be happening – but she just changed her mind on it,’ a source told the People. ‘L’Oreal is gobsmacked that she turned down such a huge amount.’

Agreeing a deal would have resulted in Adele replacing current ambassador Cheryl Cole, who signed her own lucrative contract with the brand in 2009. The offer comes after recent claims that the brand were keen to offload the former Girls Aloud star, whose deal is worth a reported £500,000 a year.

Her appointment saw an improvement in sales but Cheryl was swiftly moved to the skincare range because she kept dying her hair. The company are also said to be unimpressed with the enormous rose tattoo she had etched across her buttocks and lower back earlier this year.

Adele, whose personal fortune exceeds £35 million, was said to be in talks with L’Oreal as early as March, with sources at the time admitting they were hopeful about obtaining her signature.

‘It’s going to take a lot of persuasion to get her to agree but right now it looks like she’s close to landing a deal,’ they said.

The singer has previously revealed her disdain with celebrities who ‘sell out’ by putting their names to a string of products for the sake of easy money.

‘I don’t want my name anywhere near another brand,’ she once said. ‘I don’t wanna be tainted or haunted. I think it’s shameful when you sell out.’

News of Adele’s turnabout comes at the end of a successful year for the singer. In February she won an Academy Award for James Bond theme Skyfall, while the MBE was also awarded to her this year for services to music.

[From The Mail]

If the deal had gone through, I think it would have been a really smart deal for both Adele and L’Oreal. L’Oreal would have had a “face” that would appeal to a larger demographic and Adele would have been the recipient of the one of largest beauty contracts ever. Do you admire Adele for staying true to herself and not “selling out”? Eh. Call me a pragmatist or a cynic, but I no longer judge artists for finding creative revenue streams beyond their music. Sometimes I think Beyonce needs to get her head out of her ass, but I don’t really care one way or the other about her deal with Pepsi, you know?

wenn20061481

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

52 Responses to “Did Adele turn down a £12 million offer from L’Oreal so she wouldn’t ‘sell out’?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. moohoo says:

    i wonder if they were pushing her to lose weight – awful, i know, but it wouldn’t surprise me.

  2. GlimmerBunny says:

    Shame she turned it down. She has beautiful hair and makeup and a face that looks great in photos. Oh well, I guess L’oreal will find someone else.

    • Liv says:

      Plus I really would like to see someone with a different body type than all the models and actresses. Dammit Adele!

      • V4Real says:

        I’m ok with her turning it down. It’s like an actor who turns down a movie role they feel isn’t right for them. Adele is an established successful artist and it’s good to know it’s not all about the money.

        I agree that it would have been great for L’oreal to feature a different body type. Cover Girl did it when they contracted Queen Latifah as a spokesmodel.

  3. aims says:

    she’s stunning. She could doing a multiple gig on the QVC and I’d still love her.

    • emmie_a says:

      She really is stunning. I wish she had done it – I’d actually want to see her ads. And L’Oreal wouldn’t have had to photoshop her to death like they do with most of their current celebrity faces.

  4. brin says:

    As long as she keeps singing, I’m happy….love her!

  5. msw says:

    She has always been adamant about being an artist first and foremost, and she doesn’t need the payout. I can understand setting a boundary, because once she begins modeling, she opens the door for people to discuss her quality as a model and not as an artist. She has always said her looks have nothing to do with her talent and she shouldn’t be judged as such, so it is probably a smart move.

    I would love to see her beautiful face in the mags, but i admore her all the more for sticking to her principles.

    • Algernon says:

      I agree. Given her comments about her looks vs. talent and how her image is already so much a part of the conversation about her, I wonder if she felt like this would start down a slippery slope. Maybe she would be open to being the face of products that aren’t directly beauty related? She’s gorgeous and would make a good spokesmodel. As Kaiser said, there’s something trustworthy about her.

    • ctkat1 says:

      Agreed. She’s one of the very few female artists (maybe the only one, though we’ll have to see about Lorde) who has successfully separated her appearance from her talent. Doing a beauty campaign might blur that line.

    • Miss Jupitero says:

      +10000

    • Amanduh says:

      I think you may have inadvertently created a new word…I admore (admire + adore?) her too 😉

  6. Jenna says:

    I’m kinda glad she said no – I have a feeling her absolutely stunning face is NOT the result of years of being a firm and constant user of L’Oreal, and the only reason I would buy the stuff is if that was how she got herself looking the way she does. No, sadly, I have a feeling her complexion has a lot more to do with genes and bone structure then anything in a pot or a spray. She’s just one of those annoying women who, even when completely barefaced and frazzled (saw some pics of her shopping and she was definitely not caring about cameras) is pretty. Makeup can jazz her up to simply stunning, but it’s not needed. I hate when celebs front for makeup companies they don’t use all the time themselves, or try to claim they look the way they do only because of the stuff they hawk. (No, the personal trainers/chef/airbrushers/plastic surgeons/and stylists usually have a lot to do with how someone looks in an ad!) Her giving it a pass does kinda make me love her all the more.

  7. Harpreet says:

    Good for her.

    Those L’Oreal gals irk me a bit, like Freida Pinto proclaiming how she will not endorse fairness creams and that L”oreal embraces her dark skin, despite L’Oreal selling it’s own fairness creams, and others through its subsidiaries.

    • Diane says:

      Agree, especially because I do not believe for one minute that these big stars are buying L’Oreal off the shelves at Target.

    • Spooks says:

      What is a fairness cream?

      • Harpreet says:

        Sorry, a skin-bleaching cream, that is supposed to lighten one’s skin color with continued use.

        PS: Could totally see Adele as a Rimmel girl though!

      • Spooks says:

        Jesus, why would anyone even sell such a thing.

      • glaugh says:

        Skin-whitening products are extremely popular in many Asian countries.

      • LadySlippers says:

        Spooks,

        A lot of societies place a HIGH premium on fair skin and will go to extremes to achieve it. India is a fantastic example of that and even here in the US we have creams to erase age-spots, which is essentially a bleaching cream. Hope that helps.

      • Spooks says:

        I knew that, but I always though skin bleaching was achieved with serious chemicals, I didn’t know you could just buy a cream in a shop.

      • Harpreet says:

        I really should emphasize, this is not just an “Indian” problem, but a global one: Africa, Southeast Asia, China, Korea, the Middle East, the Caribbean.

        L’Oreal, along with Unilever (maker of Ponds, Oil of Olay) are all major companies that make these creams. The Body Shop even sells a cream like this in Asia.

    • Myrto says:

      L’Oréal sells fairness creams in South East Asia/India because there’s a demand for them. Simple as that. Should they ignore a huge market like that? That’d be really stupid. I fail to see what the problem is. Pale skin is highly valued in SouthEast Asia (and this trend precedes any Western colonization/influence, before anyone argues this has anything to do with Western beauty ideals). A friend of mine uses them regularly (she’s Vietnamese) and AFAIK, they’re not dangerous for the skin.
      As for Adèle, I have to say I would have judged her had she got a contract with L’Oréal (or any company for that matter) because she clearly doesn’t need the money and that’d seem greedy.

  8. Jan Choo says:

    I’m confused – she’s already a sell out. What gives?

  9. lower-case deb says:

    also! i’ve always liked her makeup! well done adele’s make up artist!
    for ably highlighting adele’s facial assets without going over the edge. they’re most often on point

    • LadySlippers says:

      Lower-Case Deb, Totally agree with you. Her make-up accentuates Adele without stealing the show. Bravo!

  10. Ice Maiden says:

    Am I the only one who’s slightly sceptical about the massive sums being bandied about for these sponsorship deals? Cate Blanchet supposedly got £10 million for a few ads for Armani, and now this? You’d have to sell an awful lot of mascara and lipstick to make up for that – and L’Oreal have loads of other ‘spokesmodels’ too. Sounds a bit excessive, even by celeb standards.

    • AmyR says:

      I worked in L’Oreal USA’s finance department for a few years – trust me, the Paris HQ can justify paying models money like this.

  11. Dani2 says:

    Her face is gorgeous and her make up is almost always on point, I can see that she wants to be an artist first and foremost so I respect her for this.

  12. capepopsie says:

    STUNNING!
    I Think she did the right thing. She´s controlling her Life and she doesn´t want to burn out the way some people are (take notes Miley + Lady G). She doesn´t want to be a nuisance in our faces, so she sticks to her metier, for which she has earned my respect. 🙂

  13. Sarah says:

    I dont have a problem with artists earning a lot of money but i have a problem with artists bending over for big companies. especially when it comes to teen idols who can sell anything to their young fans.

    also if you sign a deal like that you give everyone the right to judge your appearance. you make money with it in the public eye so its ok. a singer like adele should only be judged on her music and lyrics. if she starts modeling its all fair game.

    integrity is something thats considered conservative nowadays and people who turn down money are being called dumb. maybe those people are smarter than the people just seeing big sums. everyone can say “oh look 12 millions, thats a lot, i’ll sign” but turning it down says a lot of positive things about someones ethics and brains.

    it certainly makes me like her more.

    • LadySlippers says:

      Integrity is so rare today, so while I think she’d make a fabulous spokeswoman for L’Oreal (a plus size woman? Oh joy!!!), I applaud her for standing by her convictions.

      Although, it IS a loss for a great many women who don’t fit the model of beauty today… And for that I’m a teensy bit sad.

  14. Alice says:

    Good if she did, they test their products on animals.

  15. Trudy says:

    So L’Oreal is just giving anyone a contract these days right?

  16. NovemberScorpio says:

    She would be perfect with her gorgeous hair, face, and skin. Honestly, Adele can do no wrong in my book!

  17. Tulip says:

    Maybe it was as other posters said, an issue of having to look a certain way and keep a certain weight.
    Maybe integrity. Maybe they didn’t offer enough money. Eh.

  18. Jegede says:

    Adele has openly stated the UK tax laws are s-c-r-e-w-i-n-g her Big Time

    If she was that concerned about ‘not selling out’, I doubt she would have been in negotiations in the first place.

    Sounds like spin to me

  19. TheOneandOnlyOnly says:

    Agree brin and sarah; Good for Adele, let models do the cosmetics ads – that’s why they were so much better in the 80s and 90s when they had supermodels appearing in them ; Remember Revlon’s Unforgettable faces ads run from 87 to 1991 – you don’t see ad campaigns like that anymore – and people are tired of JHO and beyawnce etc. shilling everything under the sun; singers should sing, actors/actresses should act, and models should model.

    • JD says:

      I remember those ads, I loved them. I am sick of seeing actresses as models for things now; bring back Cindy Crawford, Linda Evangelista and the rest.

      ETA: But I do like Adele, I’m glad she turned this down.

    • theNood says:

      And the whole perfume thing. Every man and his dog now have their own perfume whereas once upon a time the perfume houses created these beautiful scents and had credibility. It annoys me.

  20. manta says:

    Maybe because some of my favorite female artists are Tracy Chapman, Joan Armatrading,PJ Harvey , Shirley Manson or Skin (Skunk Anansie), I don’t understand why a singer who wants to be recognized for her music should sign a deal to sell make up or soft drinks that she probably doesn’t use in the first place.
    Wherever she is right now, I’m sure Cesaria Evora is thankful that some people chosed to listen to a SINGER without considering the quality of her hair/skin/sense of style.
    Good move Adele.

  21. mar says:

    Maybe she does not like the fact that Loreal animal tests, and they are one of the worst companies known for that.

  22. Summersun says:

    Wouldv’e much preferred to see Adele in ads rather than Blake Lively. So Disappointed 🙁

  23. lucy2 says:

    It’s possible she didn’t feel comfortable with the company or products, but if it’s really that she just doesn’t want to do any ads at all, I have a lot of respect for her sticking to her opinion and turning down that money.
    Of course she doesn’t need the money though – her next album is sure to sell like crazy too.

    She would be great for a beauty products campaign though, I think she’s so lovely.

  24. Grant says:

    I would have liked her more if she did do L’Oreal. It would be so refreshing to see her in L’Oreal ads and I’d be interested to see how lovely they would make her look, what with that flawless face.

  25. Reece says:

    Whatever the reason I’m glad. Love her but i don’t want to see her in some personality leeching makeup ad esp L’Oreal. They still animal test.

    Just to add I don’t have a problem with celebrity endorsements but we all know what the ad campaign would be and I just don’t see her like that.

  26. Viv says:

    While I respect her choices and love that she feels she can walk away from such deals, she would have rocked my world if she had done it and donated the money to a good cause. She seems like the kind of person who would understand that those 20-30 days of work for her could change a lot of people’s lives for the better. As long as it’s not advertising alcohol or cigarettes. There should be big girls in cosmetic ads- Dove is not enough.

  27. jj says:

    I’ll do it for half the money!

  28. Aloura says:

    She is hypocrite………nose job, cheek implant, chin implant….google it.

  29. Jag says:

    If she hadn’t called others “sell outs, ” I think she may have agreed to the contract. Perhaps her abrupt refusal was after someone reminded her of what she had said.

    Celebrities can endorse what they want because I can buy what I want, too. 🙂