Kim Kardashian shows off her ‘post-baby body’ on the new cover of Us Weekly

kim us weekly

Here is the new cover of this week’s Us Weekly. Kim Kardashian got her body back! And we’re supposed to believe this because Us Weekly always gets the exclusives about Kim’s body. Seriously. Remember that trip that the Kardashian-Jenner clan made to Greece? They brought along an Us Weekly photographer and they probably got editorial control over those “Kim’s pregnancy body” photos. The gist of it is that Us Weekly is totally and completely in bed with the Kardashians, so just read this as an advertisement:

If Kim Kardashian’s critics didn’t get the message when she posted that sexy swimsuit selfie, which she called her “big middle finger to the world,” this should do the trick. Six months after giving birth to daughter North West, the 33-year-old reality star is proudly showing off her post-baby body in a skimpy bikini — and Us Weekly has all the exclusive photos in its new issue.

Strutting confidently along the beach on Nov. 30, the blonde stunner flaunted her slimmed-down figure and famous curves in a revealing white triangle top and matching side-tie bottoms. It’s a big milestone for the star, who endured fat-shaming and cyberbullying for the weight she gained while pregnant with little Nori earlier this year.

“Kim feels confident again,” a source close to the first-time mom tells Us. “She worked really hard and is so motivated to stay fit.”

Indeed, as revealed in the new issue of Us Weekly, Kanye West’s fiancee has adhered to a strict diet since she got the all-clear from her doctor. And her dedication has clearly paid off.

[From Us Weekly]

Sure. Whatever. Kim still claims she’s doing Atkins, which I sort of believe. I believe she’s dieting, for sure, but I also think she’s had some surgical help along the way, especially since her face has been looking sort of different too. A “source” close to Kim also told Us Weekly: “She wakes up and does more than 100 squats every single morning. Even now, when she can wear the things she did before her pregnancy, she still wants to tone her body.” Us Weekly puts a number on it too – they say Kim has lost “50 pounds” since giving birth.

Meanwhile, remember that “controversy” about Kim’s eBay auctions and how only 10% of the money (if that) was going to charity? Well, Kim wants to explain the situation:

I feel compelled to speak about something that is in my head and my heart. Over the years, I’ve had to grow a thick skin. Being in the public eye, there are times I feel like I get criticized for any and everything I do. I’m used to it now. I just choose not to feed into negativity or become consumed by it.

The problem comes in when I get attacked for giving and trying to help people. My dad always taught me the importance of giving back. I don’t publicize everything I do to help charities and people all over the world. I do it because I want to. I do it because my dad taught me to. I do it because it’s the right thing to do. So for people to attack me for giving 10% of my eBay auction sales to the people of the Philippines, that hurts.

I do eBay auctions monthly and change the charity or church from time to time. I give 10% of all my earnings to charities, not just these eBay auctions. This month it’s for the people of the Philippines, last month was Life Change Community Church.

In regards to these eBay auctions, when the eBay numbers get broken down, the auction management agency that posts for me gets a percentage for all of their hard work, then eBay listing fees, end of auction fees, eBay Store fees, Paypal fees, etc., all add up to about half of the sale. Then I give 10% to a charity.

Truth is how the # is broken down, is neither here nor there. The people of the Philippines need all of our help, no matter how big or small.

Over the last 5+ years, I have listed thousands of items on eBay Giving Works for various causes. I will continue to do what is in my heart and am happy to know many others have enjoyed purchasing from me, as they too are giving with me.

Giving comes from the heart. We all need to be reminded of this as we celebrate the holiday season this year.

[From Kim’s blog]

I believe her when she says that she consistently gives 10% to charity no matter what. I really think she does that. The problem was never that 10% of her profits go to charity – the issue was what she claimed going into an auction. If you say “the proceeds go to such-and-such charity,” then that’s what needs to happen. Don’t put it in small print at the bottom “oh and only 5-10% of the proceeds actually go to charity.”

FFN_Kardashian_Kim_GGFF_112613_51273241

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

131 Responses to “Kim Kardashian shows off her ‘post-baby body’ on the new cover of Us Weekly”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. bns says:

    No one cares.

    • lana86 says:

      her face on the cover looks smaller than her boob…. or is it just me??

      • idk says:

        You’re right, her head is not proportional to her body…they probably switched her head from another pose that was further away and attached it to her body from a pose closer to the camera without realizing how awkward it’s going to look. Ok I hope that made sense.

      • chaine says:

        the head is off kilter on the neck and too tiny for the body. terrible photoshop job.

      • Paige says:

        Idk-makes sense! HYSTERICAL-The photoshop is laughable!
        Her head is from a totally different distance!

      • Stef Leppard says:

        Frozen face, photoshopped head, legs, and waist. She’s totally natural, you guys.

      • Inconceivable! says:

        Massive photoshop job! This is hardly an eff you to her critics. It’s just more fodder to laugh at her about. She looks ridiculous, as usual. WHY do we never see video footage taken at the time she is showing off this new bikini body?! I would give her credit to show video footage or actually allow paps to photo her on the beach. Seriously, she always photographs in private, but claims it’s all for public consumption. Is this the private life she was going to live?

      • gogoGorilla says:

        LOL! I couldn’t figure out why she looks like such a pinhead.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Hahaha! Pinhead!

    • atorontogal says:

      Someone must care because this awful family keep getting their faces/lives splashed all over the place. It makes me sick.
      All the homeless/starving people in their own backyard, and all they can think to do is shove in our faces how much better off they are than us. And there are those who prop them up by buying their products and magazine covers.
      Not until we put more value on our teachers and emergency responders, and pay them what they deserve will the world balance be restored.
      I worry for the next generations.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      Body is to Kim Kardashian what hair is to Jennifer Aniston.

      In other words: ZZZZZZ

      • idk says:

        I never understood why people are so fascinated by Jennifer Aniston’s hair? It’s nice but there are many women with similarly nice hair.

    • Amy says:

      I recently cancelled my Us Weekly subscription because I just couldn’t stand all the Kartrashian fawning and told them that in the email…I see they not only didn’t stop, their sickening arse kissing, they’ve gotten worse…ugggghhhh

  2. dorothy says:

    Yawn, Wake me when it’s over.

    • Secret Squirrel says:

      You know if she shed that thick skin she has had to develop, she could drop another few pounds…

  3. Mayday says:

    what happened to tracy anderson helping her?

  4. prissa says:

    Cute orange shoes. Other than that… Blah.

  5. Mon says:

    She completely misses the point

  6. Nerd Alert says:

    Too bad she’ll never get her face back.

  7. Shalamar says:

    This blimp is going down in flames. Soon.

    • janie says:

      Wow… It’s amazing what photoshop, plastic surgeons and money can buy..

      • Camille (TheOriginal) says:

        +1000000.

        You said everything I had to say about this Janie.

      • Belle Epoch says:

        Exactly! How much is the Mommy Makeover – not counting the nose job?

        If she had lipo (and I am certain she had some kind of “help”) the results could get their revenge later, because the body puts back fat cells – just in a different place.

        Or she may have used that new “fat melting” technique, so she can claim she did not have surgery. But she lies like a rug so it doesn’t matter what she says.

        Will people buy this cover? Is it worth the cash KK pays the magazine?

    • Decloo says:

      Yikes! That’s pretty nasty. I don’t care much for her but I think she looks good. She looks good in other event photos too, clothed.

  8. Tiffany says:

    There really is nothing there with this girl is it.

  9. Megan says:

    Ebay fees aren’t much at all, she’s still keeping 50% of the profit. As for her weight loss, can’t bash her on that, 50lbs is a big accomplishment but if she wants to keep it off, exercise! Everything is photoshopped anyways, I’d like to see what she really looks like.

    • idk says:

      From what I know, the fees and administration costs are taken out of the 10% so that less than 10% actually goes to charity. Anyways, you can’t force someone to give…but you can make them at least be honest. You can’t advertise a “charity auction” when MOST of the money is going in your own pocket.

      • Florc says:

        This is sadly common practice with many charities and foundations. They’re not simply taking the cash raised and spending it for the good of the charity. They’re paying themselves, their staff (ceo’s boards, etc…), their overhead costs, and any independent outsourcing for raising funds or solicitors.
        Kim might have the same set up, unless she’s the one sorting each item, posting it on Ebay, and shipping it out. I believe this is the case. This is not shocking and we should all be very aware of what charities we donate to if we really want our donations to make a difference.

      • idk says:

        @ Florc

        I totally agree. I used to donate to a major charity all the time but got fed up when they kept mailing out stupid stickers and cards and notepads instead of spending the money on RESEARCH, etc. Even now when I don’t donate anymore, they STILL send me free pens and stuff in the mail. I’ve told them to stop sending me stuff but they don’t listen. Just imagine how much money is spent on stupid crap like that. I now just donate clothing and canned goods to the needy.

      • Lucinda says:

        That is why I donate to Salvation Army. They have one of the best percentages of donation reaching people vs. overhead.

      • meh says:

        You need to research the Salvation Army and their anti-gay discrimination. That charity does not deserve one penny.

      • gefeylich says:

        Thank you – was just about to say that The Salvation Army is horribly homophobic. I don’t give them any money anymore because their message of “charity, generosity and love” is false, discriminatory and definitely anti-Christian.

        Kardashian, on the other hand, is just false, grasping and self-serving. In other words, she and the SA are about neck and neck when it comes to “charity.”

  10. Mylene - Montreal says:

    She is again so egocentric .. looking good it’s the only thing she thinking about .. i hate this women

  11. Zigggy says:

    I’m so sick of the post baby body sh*t. There’s a lot more to life.

  12. Addie says:

    Those legs don’t look like they are doing 100 squats a day, LOL. Dieting maybe , exercise – that body does not reflect it.

    • Florc says:

      Squats tone. It doesn’t put on muscle unless you add resistence. She has a curvy body and puts on weight easily. Squats and wall sits are great for toning. Not as great at burning fat.
      That photo is too touched up (as are most mag covers are) to tell if she works out.

      • amr says:

        Bodyweight squats are valid for building muscle. However, their effectiveness is dependent upon the strength of the performer. As soon as they cease to be a stimulus that is challenging, they will no longer be effective at building muscle mass.

    • Dommy Dearest says:

      From someone that does 500 (through the course of the day) her quads would be much more toned and built, even if she isn’t using resistance. Like you’d see the muscle bulging but not at the extent weight squats would bulge. Those legs are just legs that stand up and sit down in heels.

  13. I Want To Live In New York says:

    Fat Bullies? Who was bullying her?

    • Karen says:

      Are you kidding?

      • I Want To Live In New York says:

        Ok who was bullying her? From where I was, most of the stories I saw where about whether or not she was doing stuff to her face and her clothes. No one forced her to walk around in a dress that looked like a lamp shade!
        The thing I have a problem with, is the “bullying”. I find it hard to see what she has been through is that much different from what other celebs have been through. It seems like “bullying” is the new way to get sympathy.

    • Florida Girl 50 says:

      I never knew who Kim was until she got pregnant so I don’t know if she was bullied before that time or not. However, I read most comments here and in the DM and people were NOT criticizing her weight gain…just her incredibly, horrible maternity style. The girl has no clue how to dress her body! Pregnant or not.

      • Camille (TheOriginal) says:

        Exactly! It was her horrible fashion sense that people were making fun of!

      • Florc says:

        People were calling her a cow, whale, and fat pig. Also, commenting on how ugly the baby would be and even worse. It was sick. It wasn’t everyone, but it was a lot. And almost no one stuck up and said making fun of a pregnant woman’s weight was wrong. Yes, she wore some horrible clothes in the beginning especially, but she wore some nice clothes too. Many comments were thankfully caught and removed.

    • idk says:

      It was the media (mags, gossip sites) that put out the “fat shaming” stories, you know the people Kim can’t live without.

  14. LilyT says:

    It is money, image and “brand” before all else. The Kardashian holy trinity.

  15. Echo says:

    Tracy Anderson just said Kim isn’t very good at working out! Basically, Kim is not the most dedicated client of hers. Ha!!!

  16. Honey says:

    “The blonde stunner”.. bwahahaha!!

  17. An says:

    HER FACE!!! That post-North nose job is hysterical.

  18. HH says:

    1 – I like that bathing suit.

    2 – The charity issue… How do you break down and detail all of the fees and who they’re going to, but then say that’s neither here nor there????? Clearly, it is.

    • idk says:

      Seriously, do you really think she wrote that ? Sounds like someone wrote it for her and she just posted it.

  19. doofus says:

    jaysus, how much of her body did they shave off in photoshop?

    because her recent pap shots make her look bigger than that cover…thighs and waist are the most noticeable…

  20. TxGal says:

    Who really believes she lost weight the normal way instead of going Hollywood style?

  21. Yelly says:

    She’s totally sucking in.

    • Hautie says:

      She is sucking in so hard… I am surprise her eyeballs did not pop out from all the built up pressure.

      But I will not trash talk her efforts. She blew up like a balloon during that pregnancy. And when that happens… it normally takes a miracle to lose it. She has done a decent job of it.

      But seriously. How are her eyes? I bet there were busted blood vessels after that walk on the beach. 🙂

  22. TeresaGiudice says:

    Tummy tucks, fat wraps(where you burn like 5000 calories a session), and photoshop is how she really lost the baby weight. You know her lazy ass doesn’t diet, exercise, or do anything that involves breaking a sweat. Ho strolling for the paparazzi is her cardio!

  23. Macey says:

    Talk about things that make you say b*tch please!

    For starters, those cover pics are so photo-shopped its not funny. Why bother with the charade when everyone with eyes can see she looks nothing like those pics.

    as for her “charity”, the funniest is that Life Change Community “church” is owned by PMK herself and is nothing more than a tax shelter. They now changed the name to California Community Church or something like that but again, nothing more than a tax shelter that they can withdraw from at any time and run their personal expenses thru it.

    Her break down of fees is totally bogus b/c Ebay waives some of those fees if the proceeds are going to auction, not sure if there is a minimum amount you must donate to get that but still, even if they weren’t it would be equivalent to about 15% of the sale. The way she worded her statement sounds like she donating off the net and not the gross so that makes it even lower, more like 5% and the rest goes into KK’s pocket even if it is donated to her mom’s bogus “church”, its still going into their pockets.

    I would love to know how PMK even got tax exempt status for her tax shelter when they do not do anything charitable with that money. Exactly what do they claim PMK uses the “church” money for?

    • littlestar says:

      Thanks for posting! I was just coming down here to ask what “church” it is that her mom owns. Now I know. Disgusting, despicable, and sad.

      • TG says:

        Yes everyone is focusing on the pic which isn’t important but her words are very telling. Notice it was only her father who taught her about charity? I have seen enough episodes also where every one of them mention how their father taught them about how lucky they are and to always give back. Not once has any of them ever mentioned PMK taught them anything about giving back. And notice Kimmy K gives most of her “Charity” money to PMK. I guess charity really does begin, and in their case, end at home.

  24. Hannah says:

    “the star, who endured fat-shaming and cyberbullying for the weight she gained while pregnant ”

    It’s as if she wrote that article herself, which she may well have. Or a source close to her, ahem.

    • Florc says:

      It’s not like it’s not true. All that stuff did happen.

      • bluhare says:

        I’m normally with you 100%, Florc, but not on this one. When you put your body out for public consumption, it’s fair game. She’s doing it now with these photos. So we’re supposed to jump up and down and cheer, but when she bloats up, dresses in a way that accentuates it, has tabloid articles talking about how miserable her pregnancy is yet wears outfits that appear to make it worse, we’re all supposed to sit down and shut up?

      • Leila In Wunderland says:

        I’m going to have to disagree, bluhare. body-shaming isn’t ok, it’s bad for society- whether the one being publicly shamed is talented, modestly-dressed Kelly Clarkson or talentless, annoying fame-leech Kim K who wears tight skirts and poses nude.

      • Dommy Dearest says:

        But then there is the argument that Kim has put herself in situation after situation to get critiqued about her body. I get that she isn’t a body builder or personal trainer but she puts ridiculous stress on how she looks. It’s alright for someone to have a different opinion and sometimes that includes ‘Well no, you’re fat’. I think there is a degree of body-shaming that goes on, especially with Kartrashian, but at the end of the day if a person can’t take a critique on something they obviously care about so much- where is their ability to improve on the critique? Kim could easily take the remarks as a ‘Oh, well I guess I should do more sit ups’ if she cares that much. But if she doesn’t (care) then she doesn’t need to worry about them and thus the shamers are just wasting hot air.

        She does, however, care about her looks more than anything and since she puts herself out there in her ways of flaunting in order to boost her self-esteem she needs to deal with the harsh truth that her body isn’t as perfect as she thinks. And with that you’d think she’d work on it versus trying to tighten with surgery.

        But that’s my view on it and I hope it translated to what I was wanting to say versus hot air on my end haha

  25. BeckyR says:

    She lives for this s**t, doesn’t she? How damn shallow can you get?

    • mojoman says:

      True dat. Her life time goal is revolved around how to look hot and sexy (thru plastic surgeries or photoshops). Yet here we are, wishing in our life time we could become a better partner/parents, charitable and able to contribute to society. But guess who will society pay more attention to?

  26. Cristina says:

    She’s sucking in her belly like her life depends on it. Or at least that’s how it looks to me. And she has a weird expression.

    This cover was long overdue, I’m surprised she didn’t bombard us with post-baby body photos and covers one month after giving birth.

    • wtf says:

      +1

      If she sucks in any harder, she’s going to bust a lung.
      I’ll just go ahead and admit that I think that she is beautiful, and she has a beautiful body. But DAMN is all this necessary?

  27. Heather says:

    She needs to do some research on squats….doing over a hundred each morning is a massive waste of her time. Three sets with low reps and high weight would be far more effective. How does she not know this when she has all the money in the world for personal trainers? Sorry…bit of a rant as I recently started weightlifting.

    • Florc says:

      I wish more info was given about it. Is she just rolling out of bed and doing squats being held for only a few seconds. Is there resistence involved? Going until failure which just happens to be 100? Is she doing reps? If she’s doing these things then it’s not a waste of time.

  28. yeahright says:

    It’s been like what? six months since her baby was born? She doesnt look as small as she has in the past but she does look good, I don’t see how this alludes to any sort of surgery. It’s a sufficient amount of time for someone to revert back to pre-pregnancy shape, especially someone who probably has the time and money to spend on a healthy lifestyle. She also had a tremendous amount of swelling while pregnant… remember the shoes of doom? Shudder.

    I don’t care much about her and I havent even watched her show but good grief, she’s being slightly overpunished for her famewhoring.

  29. Kaya says:

    This is so stupid. Got her body back from what? The bottomless abyss of despair that is the evil of pregnancy? Great achievement. Count your blessings and love your baby, your family. Losing 50 pounds in six months so you can strut in near nakedness to show you did EXACTLY what your haters pressured you to do? They called you fat, so you made it your mission to be skinny. My God, the stupidity of this one.

  30. velourazure says:

    Post-baby NOSE.

  31. mizhaitian87 says:

    Her face looks so terrible that it’s not even funny anymore…why pay so much money to look older than you are and so plastic..isn’t plastic surgery suppose to make you look better, not worst?

    when she first came out, she looks so exotic and beautiful, now she..shakes head..I guess when you get plastic surgeries when you don’t need them, it makes you look worst..

    do I really believe she lost all that weight on dieting alone…hell no..look at her face..if she’s willing to pay so much money to mess with her face, trust she didn’t lose all that weight dieting alone..

    and alot of people were making fun of her weight when she was pregnant..calling fat..

  32. babblerouser says:

    I love the photoshopped abs. Work of art.
    Now, about that nose….

  33. lulu says:

    I feel bad for her. I mean I know she did if to herself but she just is so dumb. About everything! And yes, that face! What the hell?

  34. Gistine says:

    She lost the life in her eyes, too. That is one dead-assed looking broad.

  35. Josephine says:

    Two comments. First my guess is that she gives 10% because that’s exactly what she needs to give to keep her taxes as minimal as possible. And giving to mommy’s church is not giving to charity. That that horrid woman is even associated with a church is all wrong.

    Second, doing these types of covers is exactly why people went to town about her weight during her pregnancy, These celebs, and I use that term lightly, just don’t get it. When you invite the world to judge you on your body, and when you have nothing else going on, people are going to judge you by your body. She has the ability to make the comments stop, but I think she is incapable of not focusing on her looks, probably because she has nothing else. And one last thing: why is showing off those wonky breasts? They are so uneven, and I’m surprised that she is highlighting them.

  36. twoblues says:

    How about focusing a little more on being a mommy and less on your choice of bikini?

  37. Dani says:

    That picture is so photoshopped, that her ‘shopped face looks better than her real face.

  38. JudyK says:

    Anyone notice how she NEVER talks about her baby, only HER body.

    Enough.

    • dorothy says:

      For Kim, it’s not about the baby. It’s all about her, her, her.

    • Dommy Dearest says:

      I think she was expecting the kid to look more like her than Kanye. Just like Beyonce was expecting her spawn to look like her rather than Jay-Z.

  39. pk says:

    Since when does Kim or any of the Kardashian’s have thick skin? If they truly didn’t care what people said they wouldn’t feel the need to set the record straight on their blogs, twitter, etc.
    And even IF (a big fat if) this photo wasn’t photoshopped and/or Kim didn’t have liposuction, she has to know that this last bit of tweeking to her face has done her no favors.

    • idk says:

      It has been proven the Kardashians themselves put out rumors and then quickly dispute them. This is how they stay in the media. It’s a little trick they use, but people have caught on.

  40. good buddy says:

    So, her weight loss has nothing to do with whatever breastfeeding she did. Like her body and her daughter are not connected. .I don’t see her celebrating her daughter as much as she celebrates her arse!

  41. hateonit. says:

    ok. no one wants to say how it looks painful for her to smile? shes really quite vapid….who cares if you lost the baby weight how about talking about your child? or does she resent the poor little baby for making her gain weight in the first place? le sigh….such a shallow chick. some people gain weight and it never comes off. some it does right away but in the end who cares? you have a beautiful new baby!! what the actual hell is wrong with people. seriously though, her nose and face. done. she was the prettiest thing i ever saw when she was with reggie bush….i dont like her as a person or as she presents herself but before i would never ever say she was hideous. she was gorgeous and now look at her. tisk tisk.

    • TG says:

      I agree Kim and Reggie were so hot together and that sexy photo shoot they did was way hot. I think one reason she looks dead-eyed now is that she has fugly Kanye and not a hot guy like she probably always assumed she would end up with. For someone as vain and vapid as she is that has to be gross to have to pretend to be attracted to Kanye. He is all kinds of fugly.

  42. hahahah says:

    keep saying it…poor baby.

  43. JudyK says:

    KK and Kanye are both completely vapid.

    Yeah, look it up…neither of you know the meaning of the word. And Pimp Mom doesn’t care, since she pulled both her teenage daughters out of highschool. Mother of the Year Award.

    With the exception of Bruce and Kourtney (admit I like her and at least she’s a good mom), this entire family is nothing but White Trash. In fact, they define the word.

  44. Rachel R says:

    That expression! She looks like she’s sucking it in so hard she can’t breathe, lol!

  45. Birdix says:

    I’m not a fan of the kardashians, but I like that she can take this body, which is not what you see in fashion mags, and be proud enough of it to strut around the beach in that tiny bikini.

  46. Carolyn says:

    cosign with all other bloggers…zzzzzz, who cares & the people photoshopping for this mag must have done overtime for this cover. that’s all. kountdown to kardashian implosion.

  47. Dawn says:

    Photoshopped to the max. And really can she just give it a rest? So Kimmode try to do something new with your life other than having pictures published, try helping out a charity (NOT your mother’s either) by donating some real money and your time (when you don’t get paid to show up). If you truly want people to forget that all you are is the girl who made a very raunchy sex tape and capped it off with a gold shower in her mouth than change. Some how I don’t think she can care about anything that does NOT stare back at her in the mirror. And this is why I and much of the world just want her to go back to being the nobody she was before her big sex tape expose. But I will say when it comes to con jobs she is the best of the best.

    • Missykittens says:

      the golden shower went in her mouth? Eww.

      Did the golden shower really happen? I have heard people say that a cousin of a friend of a friend saw it but that sounds bogus to me… I want to know if anyone on here actually saw it THEMSELVES, first hand…?

  48. moo says:

    that family is incredibly impressed with themselves, aren’t they?
    she and her boytoy make me sick!

  49. marina says:

    If my body looked like that I wouldn’t dare wear a bikini. Am I supposed to think she looks fantastic? I guess considering she was HUGE while pregnant it’s an accomplishment, but other than that, nothing special. Plus, I’m sure it’s super air brushed, as always.

  50. Tracy says:

    When Kim disappeared from the pap strolls for a few months, I was slightly optimistic that she was taking motherhood seriously and taking care of her baby. Now I see she was busy recovering from multiple plastic surgeries. Poor Noth, her mom spends way more time in the day glamming her self up than she does bonding with her.

  51. Palermo says:

    The funny thing is her fans always accuse everybody of being jealous and haters, but I wouldn’t trade lives with her for all the money in the world. There is nothing going on upstairs with her at all, she has zero self confidence or she wouldn’t need to be consumed with her looks. She’s just sad to me.

  52. bailey says:

    She just seem so extremely immature to me, both, Kim and Kanye only care about themselves, so much ego between the two of them. I wonder when Kim last read a book, she seems so uneducated and shallow. There is nothing wrong about taking care of your looks, because who wants to be ugly and fat, but Kim seems to care only about the exterior. Does she ever wants to be smarter not just thinner and dressed to the nines. There is more to life than looks, someone should explain it to her already.

  53. Paloma says:

    I’m waiting for her next PR stunt which will be a pic of North breast feeding ala Giselle B. I have no doubt she is envious.

    • idk says:

      Her next PR stunt will happen after Kendal is seen out again with Harry Styles. Haven’t you noticed a pattern with Kim? It’s like she can’t stand it if someone else in her family is getting attention so she has to outstage them.

  54. Decloo says:

    Forget Kim’s body. Her mother owns a church??!! WTF? Did she learns this tax shelter scheme from CO$? How can people get away with this sh*t?

  55. Dommy Dearest says:

    Some truth: She hasn’t been working out and you can tell just by looking at her body. She’s probably lost some of the weight restricting what she’s eating and how much she’s taking in. Her stomach looks like if you were to grab it you’d be able to pull some flesh and fat. My thing is that she needs to stop lying about working out. That is not a body that works out. Even if she worked out for three days for 30 minutes at the least every week her body would be much toner than what it is. I get everyone bounces back after pregnancy, I lost the 50 I gained within two months and then lost about 20 more but her body is the clear definition of no workout after baby. Just plastic surgery and delicate eating.

    Also I don’t care if she gives 10% why does she need any of the percentage with the money she has? Especially when a lot of those clothes were given to her for free. Kash Kow needs to be donating more in my opinion. I know if I had her money I’d already have charities formed and regular donations being put into the account.

    • Josephine says:

      I agree about the lack of working out. She has no muscle definition whatsoever. At her age, the arms get buff pretty quickly, and in real pics you can see that she has soft, doughy looking arms. And her legs are shapeless. That’s all good — it’s just that it seems like 90% of what she says is a lie.

  56. Pearly says:

    She must think the general public are brainless-10% is the minimum to be able to write off taxes at that number-as is the crap she refers to about her religious write offs

  57. Bnicole says:

    Wow. Look at that beautiful, god given face of hers……

  58. homegrrrral says:

    Remember the flour Bomb!?

  59. lisa2 says:

    I guess for some women all they have to talk about is their bodies and hair and exercise. We see this with other women outside Kim. I think if that is the topic of conversation you put out there all the time then you are inviting people in your life to speculate and comment. If Kim and others want to be seen as something more then they need to change the dialogue. Stop all the dumb twit pics and intsagram pics that are so superficial.

    but maybe that is all they have. A woman with substance has more to her than these things.

  60. Meggin says:

    Oh man. She is starting to look like Michael Jackson from so many nose jobs and plastic surgery.

  61. skeptical says:

    Pfft since her head is the same size as one of her boobs I’m calling photoshop and I say she doesn’t look anything like that. This vapid louse is so vain, even her selfies are posed & carefully lighted. How much more a “photoshoot” she intended to kiss her overinflated a$$?