True Detective ‘Maybe Tomorrow’ recap: so much brooding, so little police work

TD1

MAJOR SPOILERS for last night’s episode of True Detective, “Maybe Tomorrow”

Well, as it turns out, that thing that sort of happened last week didn’t really happen. I mean, it did happen and we saw the blood spurt out of Velcoro’s gunshot wounds and everything, and then the show opened on his seemingly lifeless body the morning after… and then he woke up. He had been shot by, like, rubber bullets or buckshot or something. He had broken ribs and he was hurting but he survived. So there was your easy resolution to last week’s cliffhanger: Colin Farrell is still with us and will probably survive the season, although he did have a half-dead dream where he was told by his father that he (Velcoro) would “go first” or something. That he would die. Which wouldn’t surprise me at all.

What does surprise me is how little police work is being done. It feels like we barely got ten minutes of police procedure (if that) to fifty minutes of character study. And to be honest, these characters are very poorly drawn and they mostly seem like rip-offs of other films and TV shows. They aren’t interesting “character studies” especially since a lot of the “plot” just seems to be “characters spinning their wheels.” This is where some good police procedure might help propel the story forward. What do we really know after this episode? That Paul Woodruff does about an hour of police work a day and then he just broods on his bro-date with a male ex-lover (like that wasn’t telegraphed from the beginning)? That Bezzerides and Velcoro have chemistry together but it’s not exactly sexual? That Velcoro’s ex-wife doesn’t want him to see their child? That Bezzerides thinks Velcoro is basically a harmless burnout and she’s not out to get him? We sort of knew all of that before this episode. Even the big “chase scene” wasn’t all that interesting.

Yesterday, I read this interesting theory about the two seasons of True Detective and whether they are connected. As in, maybe there’s a multi-state conglomerate of powerful, well-connected men obsessed with the occult, killing prostitutes, wearing raven masks and putting antlers on dead bodies. I don’t think the seasons are connected, just because I think Nic Pizzolatto’s hacky writing is getting progressively worse and he wouldn’t be able to accomplish the layers of conspiracy needed to make it work.

Yeah, I’m still sticking with it though… I’m not sure why. Despite the uneven writing, I have taken a liking to Velcoro and Bezzerides. I don’t really care if Paul and Frank live or die though. Vince Vaughn’s character – Frank – has sort of gone off a cliff for me. Blah.

TD2

TD4

Photos courtesy of ‘True Detective’/HBO.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

37 Responses to “True Detective ‘Maybe Tomorrow’ recap: so much brooding, so little police work”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Abbott says:

    RIP Stan. We hardly knew Ye.

    No seriously. Who the hell was Stan?

    • Kaiser says:

      Right? I didn’t get why we were supposed to care.

      • Abbott says:

        Tbh I’m not sure why we are supposed to care about any of the characters. They’re all so glum and terrible and have more daddy issues than Jon Snow at a father-son t-ball game.

        Although, I did scream ‘Nooooooo’ during last week’s final scene, but that’s mostly because I ran out of pizza rolls.

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        Exactly, Kaiser. The writing is absolutely awful, like a send-up of True Detective rather than its second season. And i’m sorry but Vince Vaughn is just in way over his head here–his acting is so shallow and unconvincing that every scene featuring him feels more like True Wedding Crashers.

        PS ) LOL on the pizza rolls, Abbott.

    • grabbyhands says:

      This is almost exactly what I thought out loud yesterday.

    • Taylor says:

      That’s actually an excellent question. I swear last night was the first time I saw him.

  2. Loulou says:

    On a totally separate note: weren’t we supposed to see Orange is the New Black episode recaps? I love this site’s show recaps, I want to see them for every show!! Haha.

  3. grabbyhands says:

    Okay, Nic-we get it. You REALLY like David Lynch. Quit bogarting his style to bolster your pwn poor writing.

    I will probably stick with the season even though my attention wanders many times. Colin Farrel and Rachel McAdams are doing a decent job, which helps cover up the less awesome job that Vince Vaughn and Taylor Kitsch are doing, which makes me not care in any way what happens to either of them. Speaking of Taylor-I am really surprised at how many sites reviewing the episode kept acting like his deal was somehow a surprise., considering how they have basically been broadcasting it since the first episode.

    The first three episodes really illuminate how much of the success of the first season depended on Cary Fukanaga. I think Nic Pizzolatto maybe knows that too, which is why he felt compelled to take a passive aggressive shot at him, by making the alcoholic director of the movie set they visit look like him.

    • Abbott says:

      I’m going to have to go back and look at the director! Totally missed that.

    • merski says:

      Oh, that was so ridiculous, too!! Is that all you’ve got, Pizzolatto? An Asian dude with a man-bun? “I drink!” Pfff, MAD BURN! :/

    • dread pirate cuervo says:

      This show went straight down Twin Peaks Alley last night! I don’t mind bc it was my favorite show back in the day. I guess Frank is supposed to be like Dennis Hopper’s character from Blue Velvet?

  4. Nicole says:

    I like Colin Farrell but he can’t read a script to save his life. He’s so hit or miss! Season 2 True Detective is no season 1 True Detective, that’s for sure.

  5. Beatrice says:

    I’m just about ready to give up on True Detective. Too much emphasis on atmosphere (endless freeway scenes) and brooding, troubled characters, hit or miss acting, and a questionable plot that moves at a snail’s pace. This is about 20 steps down from season 1.

    • annaloo. says:

      I turned off last night’s episode after 15 mins. The shooting cliffhanger was a cheap stunt, and the writing is just bad. I also realized that I didn’t care about any of the characters at this point.

      My summer watching is going to be Brink, Orange is the New Black and Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell.

    • lucy2 says:

      Me too. It’s incredibly boring, and the emotionally tortured cop cliche is just over the top on this one.

  6. merski says:

    Taylor Kitsch is just awful. It doesn’t help that his character is a terribly written twitchy, self-loathing gay dude, but uhh, he is just terrible. This entire season is full of badly written, laughable dialogue. I give up.

    • Kristen says:

      Seriously. VV’s, “I have a gun pointed to my head every time I take a sh*t.”

      Ugh. What??

      • merski says:

        Yikes, that entire conversation between VV and his wife at the fertility clinic was just like… uhh… what…? o_0
        Actually, strike that, all of his lines in this episode were just… nonsense.

    • Tiffany27 says:

      Seriously! Taylor Kitsch looks like he’s trying to answer a Jeopardy question every time he “emotes” and VV sounds his soul left his body. Bad acting all around. . And yes, this season is pretty shotty.
      #NeedsCaryFukunaga

    • LadidahBaby says:

      Yeah, Vince Vaughn’s acting is so shallow anyway, and then with the sh*t lines he has to deliver, there is just no hope for his character. Kitsch isn’t right for the role and his acting is pretty much in the Vince Vaughn School of Wooden Portrayals. I think Rachel is doing great–GREAT–with what she’s got to work with, and Farrell is pretty good in the right scenes, but the dialogue and the plotting really suck. So let’s get to the real TRUE detective stuff and stop trying to be “Chinatown for Cable.”

  7. MrsBPitt says:

    I think I said about three or four times last night…”what is going on?” Turning to my hubby and son “do you guys get what’s going on”…it is all a jumbled, mess to me…either, I’m stupid (Impossible, ha), I’m not paying as close attention as I should, or it’s a jumbled mess! I don’t care about any of the characters (ok, maybe Colin Farrells, but mostly for his denial about his red=haired “son”)…I’m actually, kinda bored watching it….

    • Abbott says:

      Exactly. It’s not even fun trying to figure it all out.

    • Skipper says:

      Thank you – I was wondering if it was just me. I had to keep pausing the DVR and asking my hubby “what the hell is going on?!” We were both wondering who Stan is. It really is a jumbled mess. They didn’t lay out enough of the back story… there’s been a few hints and some info, but mostly I have no idea why or how the characters got to where they are now and, more importantly, why I should care. The dialogue is truly awful and cliché, there’s way too much ‘filler’ (the musicians at the bar, the highway driving, etc.) and not nearly enough action.

  8. Taylor says:

    I actually enjoyed last night’s episode and think this season is getting better. It had my full attention from beginning to end. But it’s still very confusing to me. I had no idea a Stan even existed until the scene they showed his body. I don’t know a lot of the character’s names and titles and there are periods where I have no idea what they’re talking about or what’s going on. But still, I must watch it to the end.

    • Dhavynia says:

      I think the Stan character was there to show that he was killed the same way Ben(?) Was killed.
      The mayor’s wife and his son, that was interesting to me how Rachel’s character asked the son about the accent, we all know now where all that money he’s collecting from Frank is going.
      I’m not comparing the 2nd season to the first but I’m actually liking it

      • Abbott says:

        I read somewhere that the guy who played Stan is actually a *prolific* actor so maybe his death is supposed to mean more…somehow? I dunno. I’m so confused with this show.

  9. Kristen says:

    I’ve just found most of this season to be very flat. None of the characters have any depth at all, and that includes the central murder and the city. Idk why we’re even supposed to care that Casper was killed – someone who was mobbed up + always w/prostitutes and drug dealers got killed? Oh no, how… totally unsurprising.

  10. msd says:

    Is the writing worse or is it just that people can see Pizzolatto’s tricks now? I’m one of those people who had a real ’emperor has no clothes’ moment at the end of Season 1, so oodles of derivative style and not much substance is kind of what I expect to see when I (eventually) get round to Season 2.

    Also, Vulture says there was an odious character who was a thinly-veiled portrait of Fukunaga … if so, meeeeooowww!

  11. Rachel says:

    I’m really only watching the show because of Colin Farrell. I’m glad he’s still alive but in the doctors office when he was asked if if he wanted to live and it cut to a shot of the chest X-ray of his lungs…cancer? That’s the impression I got.

  12. Isabelle says:

    This was the best episode out of the 3. Vaughn was much better in this episode. Maybe he will be better at being “bad” versus “good”? The lines are so cheesy, the men very cheesy, etc… Read Nics book & he basically loves writing about bad broken men but these characters are coming off like Frank Miller meets Days of our Lives. Its not working. Even if the actors had the chops to pull it off, don’t think they could overcome the bad writing.

    • nicole says:

      I dont have a clue what is going on storyline wise, but I am going to keep wathcing because I think Taylor Kitsh is ggorgeous.

  13. yep says:

    First episode..meh.
    Second one…the ending had my mouth drop.
    Third one..well…Im going to keep on keeping on with it.
    Might as well. Sundays are pretty lazy around here.

  14. MAC says:

    I thought the third episode was the best out of the three.

  15. Michelle says:

    The entire scene with the doctor (getting medical clearance) was lifted pretty directly from Backstrom, including the “do you want to die?” line. Expected a little smarter from this show… at least they had Colin Farrell being a little wincey as he moved around with his broken ribs.

  16. Tre says:

    Why are you watching people? I gave up since casting was announced. I was not interested in Colin, Taylor, Vince. So didnt even plan to watch new season. Then I watched trailer and saw that I made right decision.

    Fist season was such big talk about because Matthew McConaughey looked so young and cool and then there was flashforward when he was old and dirty and looked like a loser. And everyone wanted to see how it happened and why. And there was mystery murder. And beautiful cinematography. And then there was huge letdown because ending was not satisfying.

    Second season has nothing of it. Zero. Some dark depressing shots. No story about who knows what. Taylor Kitch has no charisma,. Colin looks good only in roles of naive cute losers. Like in In Brugge.

  17. Tre says:

    Its like – would anyone watch it if it would be called some “Dirty Trap”? No one would care. They took name of first season and then gave it to different show. And expect similar success? Its like they would made new season of Friends. But took 4 people from Boston and call it “Friends” like it has some connection.