Lord help me, but I sort of dig Kim Kardashian’s kimono in these photos. Yes, I think it’s bizarre that she’s wandering around LA in a half-sheer top and a kimono, but still… it’s a great kimono. I would wear that around the house. I would wear that while watching Game of Thrones. Anyway, there’s a reason why Kim is showing off her body (??) in this bulky kimono. She’s almost down to her goal weight!
After nearly five months of hard work and dedication, Kim Kardashian is close to reaching her pre-baby weight. The reality star took to Snapchat to share a photo while standing on a scale, revealing her current weight (139.6) which she says is just 5 lbs. short of where she was before getting pregnant with little Saint West. Just to put that in perspective, that means she’s already dropped about 50 lbs. since December.
“YOU GUYS!!!!! PRE BABY WEIGHT WAS 135!!!!!” she captioned the photo, excited about her progress.
In March, she claimed that she had already lost 42 pounds of her 70-pound weight loss goal. And at this moment, she’s claiming that she’s down to 139 pounds just in the past five or six weeks? Are you buying that? I’ll buy that she’s lost a lot of weight. I’ll buy that she’s working out and keeping to her strict Atkins diet for the most part. But I do wonder if there was some lipo happening too.
Also, Kim posted this… WHAT DOES IT MEAN? This is the first and only thing she’s posted about Beyonce and Lemonade, and it’s to point out that Bey is wearing Yeezy?
Sipping' on some Lemonade this morning…. 👑🐝🍋 🙌🏽 #BeyInYeezy #WCW pic.twitter.com/DmaZoZaV3A
— Kim Kardashian West (@KimKardashian) April 27, 2016
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
I mean you can also manipulate a digital scale, so who knows with her?
Correct. You can turn the dial down so the scale starts at less than zero. Or you can hold onto things to take weight off the scale. Her butt alone has to weigh 139 pounds! And since the entire family only knows how to lie, I wouldn’t believe whatever she said.
Plus the number on a scale is SO damn arbitrary.
I wish more people understood that.
That’s the one reason I stay off the scale as much as possible.
I agrees. Scale number means nothing to me. My husband and I are very active, healthy lifestyle, workout daily…..and we don’t even OWN a scale!!!!! It means nothing to us. We go by how we physically look and feel. If you want to track loss, use a tape measure to do so.
So true Kitten, I wish I had known that the countless times I had tried losing weight before I finally succeeded and was able to go into maintenance mode. The number on the scale doesn’t take into account the amount of actual fat loss or muscle gain. Which is just as important, maybe more so.
I have banned that little terrorist from my bathroom. It can drive a person nuts. I can feel great and my pants can fit perfectly and then I step on the scale and forget that it’s the week before my period and somehow, I’m 3lbs heavier. And my day is shot to sh*t. I refuse to do that to myself.
Yes to all above. We can make ourselves crazy if we live by the scale. I tuck mine into a small corner of my downstairs bathroom and I weigh myself every 3 or 4 months just so I can update my pedometer and MFP.
But the easiest way for me to gauge my weight is by how my pants fit.
Agree, it’s just a number. I haven’t owned a scale in over 10 years, I just go by the fit of my tightest jeans. Only time I know my weight is when I go to the doctor every year.
I actually find the scale helpful. Not so much in terms of the number itself, but in the movement of that number. I’m bad for ignoring weight gain and a regular check in on the scale can make me adjust my bad habits before they are out of control. But I get how bad they can be for many people.
I’ve always gone by how my clothes fit. That’s actually how I figured out I was losing weight a few years ago – I had gone back to small frequent simple meals to deal with a digestive issue and got a food tracker to help keep track of what I was eating to make sure I was getting enough calories, fiber, and protein (I don’t plan, but record). Had no intention of doing an archeological dig to locate the scale, so I made a wild guess based on the last weight I remembered seeing on a scale quite a while back to get a daily calorie budget. I realized two months later that my clothes were definitely looser so I dug out the scale to check. Imagine my surprise when I saw my weight was about 12 pounds heavier than my wild guess, which means I had been a lot heavier when I started. I gain weight uniformly so it’s not so obvious. A few years before, I had lost too much weight too fast due to a long illness and looked like death warmed over until got in with a competent doctor and then quickly gained the weight back. So I wasn’t in any rush to get rid of the extra.
Since even I knew I really needed to drop the weight before it dropped me, I just kept doing what I was doing with scale checks to adjust the daily food budget but got tired of the scale and finally just entered my ideal weight in the tracker, which I had been in my much more active 20s and 30s when my food allergies were under good control. Put down that I was a couch potato. I figured I needed to eat at the level for that ideal weight eventually, might as well start sooner than later. Much easier than living by the scale.
I do weigh myself every day, but that’s only because my weight goes up and down and I tend to ignore the upward trends until it’s a problem if I don’t check in every day. I don’t care about the actual number so much as whether I’m staying in a five pound range.
WHY DO WE CARE WHAT THIS EMPTY SHELL OF A HUMAN WEIGHS? STOP FEATURING HER AND HER IDIOT HUSBAND…NOBODY REALLY CARES. QUIT MAKING THEM RICHER.
I adore your comment Suzanne! Brava!
+10000000000!
I didn’t click on the article, just saw your awesome comment in the Latest Comments!
I’d believe she’s 139 before I’d believe some actresses that claim to be size 8. I think this weight sounds about right with what’s pictured here. And 139 isn’t that light for her height.
I don’t think her weight is what should be worrying her the most though.
Yeah, I was surprised at how realistic (and healthy) this number sounds.
Why does she keep talking about her weight and body??? She really is baiting us, isn’t she? Girl, I don’t care about your diet. I care about the fact that you cannot give me a reason for your celebrity existence.
Amen!!!!
Pathetic.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏😂😂😂😂😂😂
But what else does she have to talk about?? I’m thinking really hard and I can’t come up with anything lol. Her clothes and body are what mean the most to her.
Unfortunately, that is so true. Her looks are her only true form of validation. Vanity is the only realm she can exist in.
Just being her typical famewh*ring self!!
I’m surprised her pre-baby weight is close to 139 pounds (since she said what it was, that’s why Im offering an opinion). Because she’s on the shorter side, I would have thought she weighed a lot less. Do the implants in the backside account for some of the pounds? If you take the implants out, her actual frame looks smaller.
Her face looks more natural and less weird in these photos.
I’m 4’11 and I’m neither overweight nor do I look like that and I weight 106 pounds currently. 139 pounds sounds resonable to me since she is a bit taller and has this giant fake ass. She’d be much lighter without the extra fat (she got a brazilian butt lift, supposedly, not implants!).
I am her height, weigh 142, and am half her size. There is NO WAY she is 139.
I’m 5’3 and 139 pounds is about 63 kilograms… that, at leas for ME, is a bit overweight. I don’t think that’s her weight, not only because she’s short but she looks bigger – that could also be the fake ass and size of clothes.
Yeah, for me that would be overweight too (I’ll have a lot of flab on my stomach when I’m at that weight, given my height which is similar to hers). I guess I’m shocked she’d admit to being medically overweight (not saying that she actually is in appearance terms as she appears to have no flab in these photos). I just wouldn’t have thought that she’d provide a number that wasn’t more celebrit-i-fied.
Supposedly she is 5’3″, but I think she is closer to 5’1″-5’2″ Maybe fake butts and boobs weight a lot less than the real thing. She looks heavier than 139 to me too, and I am 5’4″ and at 139 I look a lot thinner than that.
Her boobs look really big (and I assume they’re fake), but the rest of her below that looks flat (though she could be wearing Spanx). I think it’s her (fake) boobs that throw her appearance off. If she got rid of those, I don’t know if she’d look that big. Though on computer screens everybody looks kind of weird, and I have no idea how to gauge what size people really are.
I’m 5′ 4″ and my normal weight is 110 lbs, and I’m not skinny at that. I would definitely be very visibly overweight at 139 lbs. My breasts aren’t very big (barely an A cup, I don’t bother with bras), though, and my hands and feet are small even though I don’t feel tiny. So maybe she has a bigger frame and the fat injections into her derrière make that big a difference, in addition to whatever is real about her breasts.
Me too. I’m 5’2″ (barely) and my healthy weight (actually looking fit) is 105-110 lbs. When I quit my moonlighting job as a cocktail waitress and was only doing my day job in an office, I immediately gained weight. I got to 138 and had gone from a size 2 to a size 8-9 and on me, it did not look good. In fact, there was an incident my family and I still laugh about – at 138 lbs. I was at the hospital to visit my grandma and I was on the elevator. Coincidentally it stopped and picked up several members of my family who piled into the front – I was at the back behind some people. My sister said to my family, “Have you seen little sister lately? She is chuuuuuubby!” And I said, “Um, yah, I’m in here you know?!” and the silence was deafening. Actually that spurred me to lose the poundage. Sometimes a slam can be the push we need to launch ourselves.
Haha!!
I had a similar incident. I was visiting my grandma who i see once a year, and she mentioned to my dad that I have put on weight right in front of me. It hurt me, but it was that comment that really motivated me to start running/eat better.
Dunno. I’m about 5 feet 7 and weigh 136. It’s a healthy weight for me, I like the way I look with some meat. My mom is 4 feet eleven inches and 140 seems like it’d be a lot on her?
Neither of us have those breasts or the fake posterior, tho…
Ok but who cares how much she weighs?
Her ass will never get smaller unless she pays a visit to the surgeon who gave her a shelf instead of a butt. that thing is atrocious. she looks like an ant. a tiny frame with a HUGE behind.
Yes. The proportions are so off that it is cartoonishly comical. And pathetic, TBH.
An ant! Love it.
Yes! An ant! That’s a perfect comparison.
@paolanqar. You may have won the internet with ant butt. 😂😂😂😂😅😅
Good for her if she has, but seems like every picture of her contradicts the one before. Sometimes she looks like she has lost that much and other times it doesn’t. Seems like, to me, so much photoshopping going on.
Fun fact: assuming she’s 5’1″ (I think?) she’s still medically overweight.
Since I’m short myself and know what would be preferable for me to weigh, I did find her pre-baby weight a little surprising. Except for the parts where she got the strange plastic surgery, I would have thought she had less poundage in the areas not affected by going to the surgeon.
Since she did IVF, that pre-baby weight doesn’t surprise me. I could be wrong, but thinking she may have gained some weight because of the hormones she may have been on to make sure the IVF works. Maybe someone could enlighten me on it more.
It’s actually a crappy fact. If she is telling the truth (I doubt) then her and I look exactly the same right now. There is no way that my ass looks like that (according to the previous Celebitchy article about her measurements, she is not 55 but closer to 43). Yes, us shorties at 5’1″ know that 139 is still considered overweight, however, not all of us at that height can be or look good at 110 or 120. My ideal weight, according to my doc’s is 133-135, taking into account my bone structure.
My god, I actually was almost defending the woman…….Yikes.
Why do you need to defend her? Stating a fact isn’t attacking her. In fact, I think she looks pretty good. I just think if she was gonna LIE about her weight she wouldn’t choose a random number to put her in the overweight category. I think she’s telling the truth.
“I just think if she was gonna LIE about her weight she wouldn’t choose a random number to put her in the overweight category. I think she’s telling the truth.”
Yeah, I think it’s the fact that she’s telling us what might actually be the truth that I’m in shock about. Whenever actors around her height tell us what they weigh, it’s usually under 115 pounds no matter what they look like. I would have thought she’d claim she was 102 pounds pre-baby weight.
I’ve dissected many cadavers in my medical training and line of work. In the end, once tissue is removed from the bone, most frames will be similar when matched for sex and height. “Bone structure” or “big boned” is not a scientifically sound argument.
I understand bone structure is actually not a scientific argument, however for someone with a 42 inch rib cage and 43 inch hips, 120 lbs looks ridiculous.
TW: as a medical professional, i’m surprised you don’t know that the term ‘big bones’ isn’t a reference to size of bones, and never has been.
It’s a term referencing skeletal frame, so if someone is described as being big/small boned, they are saying they have big/small frame.
‘big/small bones’ was the ye old term to attempt to describe skeletal frame. It has never ever been associated with size, density or structure of bones.
And as you should know, the size of skeletal frame affects weight distribution such that ‘big boned’ people can take more weight than a ‘small boned’ person ie more weight distributes across a big frame, so a big framed person doesn’t automatically read as overweight visually even when they are. They also look terribly emaciated if they lose as little as a pound under their ideal body weight.
And vice versa for a small framed person ie they can’t carry a lot of weight and look better thinner. A tiny amount of weight, as little as 1lb over their ideal body weight makes them look overweight when they are not.
There are standard scientifically approved tests for figuring out if someone is big/small boned.
It has nothing to do with the size of bones, even if such a thing existed. I’m very surprised a medical professional such as yourself doesn’t know this.
I didn’t realize she was that petite. I thought she was an average 5’6″ or 5’7″, probably because we so rarely see her in flat shoes. If she is that petite, then maybe she isn’t lying about her weight, but she looks like she weighs about 150 to me. That is, if her backside isn’t padded which it may well could be. Golly, trying to tell truth from fiction with the Klan is exercise in focus and patience.
Well, she does have 20# of junk in her trunk. Eh, make that 25#.
I’m 5’10”, 175 pounds and wear a size 6. My BMI says I’m overweight and I’m about 25 heavier than my “ideal weight” Those weight ranges, BMI, etc don’t account for muscle or bone density. It’s a dangerous thing to base your expectations on charts and arbitrary calculations.
Exactly.
I think the point of providing that fact might be to show that Kim might be telling the truth. If she was going to fib, she’d probably offer a lower weight.
Celebheights and Wikipedia have her at 5′ 2.5″ and 5′ 3″ but she looks shorter to me.
When she first became famous, she made a comment about her being 5’1″ and Kourtney being 5′.
I dunno, I think all the plastic surgery she’s had makes her look heavier than she really is. I’ll buy it.
Now we know what silicon weighs.
The best thing Kim could do to get her body back is go to the doctor and get at least half of that butt filler taken off, and get smaller breasts. otherwise she looks like a cartoon. Kim is beautiful and being shorter it’s not easy to loss weight and then if you eat a slice of pizza you gain a pound so it’s great she has loss whatever weight, she is looking like her pre baby self more. But the way she wants to dress fashion styles is
Suited for a thin model not a curved sex symbol I don’t get which one she wants to be, apparently both lol. Kim does look better .
I’m 5’3″ and I ate two slices of pizza the other day and only gained half a pound. I was really excited about that since I expected to gain two or three!!
I’m sorry, I don’t buy her workIng out. When you won’t go outside without a full face of makeup, I highly doubt she’s breaking a sweat. Especially, since she also is no stranger to a plastic surgeon. She’s doing liposuction. This lazy bimbo doesn’t do anything even close to actual work. I watched one show where Kendall or Kylies dog had pooped and Kris was trying to get her to clean it up. Kim looked at her mom as if she was crazy. Kim will be ready for an episode of botched in a few years. She’ll make Joyce wildenstein look natural.
I added her on snapchat after it was mentioned here and she snaps a lot of her workouts. While she’s only working out like 20-30 mins of her hour long workouts she does post proof. Sometimes she makes an assistant or somebody snap videos of her mid-workout. And she posts her food a lot too.
Best thing snapchat did for this kind of celebrity is allow them to prove it. I’m also following Tess Holliday (the plus sized model) and her food choices are…..telling.
Really?!
Work out could still be faked – just saying.
If she works out, shouldn’t her butt get smaller too? Since it’s injected with fat, supposedly. Wouldn’t her natural fat cells in that area get smaller? Instead it’s bigger, the rest of her is smaller. To me, that’s spot reduction, indicating lipo. Maybe she’s doing both?
I think she is trying to work with a trainer and yeah she probably would prefer not to exercise that’s normal. Kim obviously love to eat and her body type is going to show every lbs. Lipo is not a cure all and from looking at Kim she seems to have lost weight all over. She needs Lipo or something on that butt I hope she did it already and it’s gonna settle down . That must hurt how do you sit down after your try to fix that right?? Kim has her problems just like the rest of us at least she comes over more down to earth to me then GOOP, Mrs Seinfeld etc.
That kimono doesn’t deserve the humiliation. IDGAF how much she weighs. That’s not an issue for me. It’s that she de-classes everything within a 5 mile radius of her. Ugh.
Oh yeah? Well I’m ten pounds away from my pre baby weight, and I’ve decided to stay put. I run three times a week, do yoga with a baby standing on my head and eat all the ice cream you can shake at me. So there.
Clapping wildly!!! Good for you!!!! I do love ice cream but it doesn’t always love me
I am NOT one for body shaming. And her weight really makes NO difference to me or my life. But there is a ZERO Percent Chance she weighs 139…even if she is only 5’1″
Working out and a strict diet yet her ass is looking bigger than ever. Go figure. She lies.
Yes, because when that ass exists in nature, it is accompanied by saddle bags and some tummy to match. She’s all lipo’d, fat transferred, spanxed, and I suspect impanted to achieve this freakish look.
@tw agree 100000000%
Not trying to be a fat basher but I’m 5’6, in France my weight dropped to 116lbs which to me is too skinny, and by American standards is underweight, my French Doctor said its perfectly normal (massive side eye), I’d say a good weight for me is 120-125. I was 135 when I was a swimmer but I had washboard abs, it was all muscle. That said she’s 4 inches shorter than me, isn’t 135 heavy? For someone 5’2? I get that she’s not going to be model skinny or even Parisian skinny (which is what I’m becoming used to) but that still seems heavy. If I were 135lbs I’d be an American 6? UK 12?, my jean size would at least be 27 and I think my good weight is a size 25 or 26. It just seems odd that someone as small as she is to claim 135 is average weight. My French doctor would say that’s massively overweight.
Your correct I am 5’2 and my ideal weight was 110 and I weighted that when I got married. After I had two kids and ten years later I was around 135 so pretty close to Kim but without that butt. What killed it for me was wine I would drink 2 glasses every single night and that added the 20 lbs over ten years. It’s really really hard to be shorter cause you need less calories if you eat sugar, carbs, or drink you either have to work out an hour a day or restrict your diet.
Tell me about it. 😀 At 1200 or 1300 kcals you just can’t eat like a normal person.
I’m 5’5″ and when I was at the height of my ED I was 107 lbs and I looked skeletal. When I went to the doctor for my anemia, they weighed me as per normal protocol and they didn’t indicate that there was anything wrong with my weight. I remember feeling really upset and let-down by that, which is f*cked up but that’s what EDs do to you.
My point is that the number on a scale is arbitrary.
For instance, right now I’m training for races and I weigh 113 lbs. I see people who do reviews on Amazon that say they weigh the same and look a good 20 lbs heavier than me. That’s not meant as shade, it’s just to say that so many different factors contribute to the number on the scale including height, muscle mass and bone structure. I’m very muscular but I’m built really sturdy–I’m not small-boned or frail by any means. I don’t think I could weight any less than 107 and still be functioning TBH.
The number on the scale is very arbitrary but I am very happy I lost 6 lbs lol. And I want to lose 10 more because at 5’4″ every little lb shows up.
Oh yes Tammy, absolutely. I think the scale is an important tool if you’re actively trying to lose weight and reach a certain goal. I just mean that we shouldn’t live/die by it.
It took me too long to realize that so…
I think it is. She’s pretty short, and she’s petite build. I was surprised she weighs that much
Which is why I think she’s telling the truth (and I never thought I would say that about her). For a celebrity, that weight, while it might suit her bone mass or whatever else, is unusual. I have never heard a “glamorous” celebrity her height ever admit to being over 115 pounds.
I think her enhanced butt and boobs throw off her figure, but if you took those out, I think she’d most likely be considered slim. Her actual legs and arms and even her shoulders don’t look fat to me. It’s the stuff she got from the doctor that looks big.
I do also think the difference even between a 5’1″ person and 5’4″ person can be staggering in terms of weight. Every extra inch helps in making the frame look leaner as extra weight comes on. If she’s at the lower end of 5 feet, then I think every pound will show on her more, and she’d have to work hard to get it off.
This is absolutely true…my BFF is 5’5 and I’m 5’2, we literally weigh the exact same amount, and she looks great and I look like a butterball. She also has “larger” bone structure and doesn’t have petite shoulders like I do, etc. Staggering is a good word for it.
I also don’t know what BMI calculator y’all are using, but I use the NIH one for work and 5’2/139 is just barely over the “overweight” range (25-29.9, hers calculates out to 25.4.) Calling that “grossly overweight” is a harmful exaggeration.
ETA: WHERE IS SAINT???
Yes ITA with both of you. For once, I think she’s actually telling the truth/
“by American standards is underweight” By what American standards, exactly? New York standards? LA standards? No offence, but based on your comment I’m not sure you’ve ever even been to the us, so I’m not sure you’re in the best position to be the arbiter of these alleged “American standards”.
Well, I’m 5’0 exactly, currently my heaviest ever, 125 pounds. At my lowest I was 90 which was definitely not nice. I have a larger frame like Kim. Although my current is not the best ever, I still don’t feel terrible and overweight, though probably “medically” I might be. I believe def that she is the weight she says
The celeb baby-fat race kind of wigs me out, to be honest. I didn’t go back to my pre-baby weight, until after my second baby lol. My little kids are 11 months apart, and I wasn’t in any rush to lose weight. But I remember how awful I felt even months after giving birth I couldnt imagine trying to work out with stitches on in my v**ina lol. It just weirds me out that THAT is what people are concerned with, I was so worried about “mom-ing” that I couldn’t do anything else.
I feel the same way! I just had a baby several months ago. I promised myself I wouldn’t be obsessed with dropping inches. Well, to be honest, I’m tall and skinny and ended up gaining a whooping 20 pounds total! I was small(felt huge)but I swam daily and walked a lot. Either way, I’m not toned like I use to be and I’m trying not to let it get to me. Being a mom right now is exhausting and taking every ounce of energy I can muster up! I have stated to gently get into my workouts again but I’m shocked at the number of people who want to talk to me about my weight. Why?! Let’s talk about my baby instead, please!!!
Oh please – unless the girl is 3′ tall, there is no freaking way she is 139lbs.
If she were really in shape – as in low body fat and a lot of muscle mass – I would believe it, because while muscle takes up a lot less space than fat, it’s dense. She is not in shape, she has no muscle tone, so her lean body mass vs. body fat is not supporting her claims either.
I guess when you spend your days photoshopping, filtering, spankx’d to the max, and denying that you EVER had plastic surgery, lying becomes as natural as breathing.
That watermelon Kim carries on her backside looks like it’s bigger than ever, coming up higher on her back! That’s got to weigh a lot. If she actually WAS losing weight, wouldn’t it become smaller? I cry FRAUD!
Why do we care so much about her weight? Yes I know she is posting about, I know she wants us to talk about her for any and all reasons, I know this a gossip site. But it’s so detrimental to girls and women to focus sooooo much of the conversation on body weight. Sigh.
Totally this. I really DGAF about her weight, BMI, ass size, etc. etc.
In 10 years, Kim is going to be 45 years old. Will she still be nattering on about her boobs, butt, size, etc. or will she acquire any depth or wisdom?
Exactly!!! I.DO.NOT.CARE.
She is just so…beige…all the time. Ugh–color can be your friend–she should try some!!
At 5’1″ and 135 lbs, she has a BMI of 25.5, which falls into the “Overweight” category.
Normal weight is a BMI of 18.5 – 24.9.
Obese is BMI >30.
And so Kim Kardashian remains an individual whose sole accomplishment in life is to lose weight.
She claims to be 5′-3″. At 141 pounds, she is in the BMI “overweight” category. At 139 she is just into the “normal weight” range. Now I know the BMI is not perfect by any means, but it gives us an approximation. She’s just down into a healthy range.
I have a very curvy body type too, and I have to weigh about 10 pounds less than my friends (of similar heights) with smaller busts and butts to look like the same size. Big boobs can make your whole upper body just appear a bit bigger than it really is, unfortunately…and I assume whatever is going on with her butt gives the same effect.
ugh, why did Beyonce wear his clothes?
lame.
I think she is confusing pounds with kilograms.
Is she including her ass in that 139 lbs?
LOL
Wow lots of body shaming in these comments. “Oh 135! Isn’t that big and overweight for her height?” Major eye roll. So what. Apart from having a pretty ridiculous butt it is clear she is a small woman. You would be surprised how underweight normal looking celebrities look in real life. I was shocked at how tiny Beyoncé looks in person when I saw her. She looks quite a bit chunkier on film and in pictures.
Agree with the body shaming.
“Wow lots of body shaming in these comments. “Oh 135! Isn’t that big and overweight for her height?” Major eye roll. So what. Apart from having a pretty ridiculous butt it is clear she is a small woman.”
For me personally, I’m surprised she might be telling the truth about the weight. Imo, if she were lying, I think she would have given a lower number. I believe her when she says she’s 139 lbs (because that is not an answer I would expect a shorter celebrity woman to give to the media).
Oh right on cue, the body shaming choir. She is the one talking about her weight. Others are allowed to disagree and comment that 135 should not be a goal weight for someone who is 5’1″. It is overweight by medical standards.
And no, it is not clear she is a small women. She is photoshopped and her body is elongated in photos.
I actually believe her. I’m 5’2 1/2″ and I weigh 110. I’m not super skinny at all and definitely have a bigger butt then most girls who have a similar frame. If I was 139, I would look quite large and my ass would be massive (not as massive as hers, but getting there lol)
Bwahahahahaha!!! Her ass weighs 139 pounds! There is no way on God’s green earth this woman weighs 139 pounds. She is lying like a dead dog on a porch.
She is SO THIRSTY to be Beyonce’s friend. And Bey is like “I barely want any association with your husband”.
I’d much rather see her fully wearing a kimono or any other type of jacket/coat than wearing jacket/coat sliding off her shoulders, having to hold her arms in the “L” position so they don’t completely fall off her body. Talk about built-in helplessness of clothing.
Now put your other foot down on the scale Kim.
Lol
@nancy YES!!! 😂😂😂😂😂
Good one! 😂😂😂😂
OT: I think she’s not liking the size of her butt post North and Saint West. I see a butt reduction in her future. I think she’s seeing that its too big for her frame.
Her weight is the least of her problems.
If that girl is 139lbs… than I am a sold size 1 and 117lbs. Seriously. No way.
I think she looks 139 lbs in these photos. Maybe less. It’s just her humongous boobs that are….whut, I don’t even know.
I don’t care about her body, her weight is her business, yet I feel personally offended on behalf of this beautiful kimono, being dragged through the dust like that. With all her money, she couldn’t afford to have it shortened a bit? I hate it when people with a lot of money show no regard for the beautiful, valuable things they own. What’s the point, if you don’t appreciate it?
That’s 139 lbs, everyone, NOT 140! Because everyone knows that 139 sounds like 130… like clothes selling for $11.99 sound like $11 and not $12. Just saying…
I don’t care how much she weighs, but I wonder if someday, at the end of her life, she will look back and realize all she thought about or talked about was her appearance. She’s missing her life.
I’m not sure she would even care. This family doesn’t seem to regret anything, probably because they lack the basic level of introspection needed to feel remorse.
And they certainly don’t possess the self-awareness needed to feel contrition or sadness.
These people are empty, insipid, vacuous vessels just floating through a life filled to the brim with excesses and a focus on the materialistic. They’re like amoebas, except they don’t contribute as much to the world.
I just depressed the sh*t out of myself but there it is.
Lol, sorry you depressed yourself! Cheer up! You aren’t at all like that! Kittens!
I need a like button for Kitten’s comment! 👍🏻👍🏻
“… she’s lost a lot of weight. I’ll buy that she’s working out and keeping to her strict Atkins diet for the most part. But I do wonder if there was some lipo happening too…”
Yeah, so what. A lot of people get some lipo after they lost a lot of weight.
Of all the “procedures” she’s done, a little lipo after losing most of the baby weight is the least outrageous.
Love her kimono.
She’d weigh 139 pounds on the Moon, so she’s kinda telling the truth!
Whatever she weighs, she still looks pregnant.
(Also, sympathies to that gorgeous kimono.)
Like her sister she has zero muscle mass. It’s all Lipo and plastic surgery. Her boobs alone were stretched to a ginormous size and they don’t sag one bit. She’s over 35 no way she got that body in a few weeks. Nice try. Just keep living the lie. Some day you’ll get it. Your average.
Yep! She was never that pretty, IMO. She was just “exotic” at the time she hung out with Paris. It was the beginning of the end for the Barbie doll look, and jlo was popular too. Kourtneys much better looking and better body, IMO. I would call Kim a social climbed.