Kim Kardashian in Cavalli at the Vogue 100 London event: tragic or sexy?

FFN_FFUK_VOGUE_DINNER_5232016_52070274

To celebrate British Vogue’s centenary, the magazine has organized several big events. Over the weekend, Vogue UK did “Vogue 100” Q&A sessions with big-name celebrities. And on Monday night, Vogue UK celebrated their photo exhibition (featuring those portraits of the Duchess of Cambridge) for Vogue 100. The opening had a big red carpet, and Kim Kardashian and Kanye West flew back to London from Rome (where they had attended the opening of La Traviata).

Unfortunately, Kim must have mixed up designers. She wore a British designer, Vivienne Westwood, in Rome and at the Vogue 100 event, she wore an Italian designer, Roberto Cavalli. Technically, this gown is Peter Dundas for Cavalli, for what that’s worth. While I dislike how showy/exhibitionist it is, I have to say that I was surprised by how thin Kim looks here. She really has lost almost all of the baby weight. Her body looks great. It’s just an unflattering dress that squishes her boobs.

wenn24040163

FFN_FFUK_VOGUE_DINNER_5232016_52070285

More photos… here’s Kate Moss, who was the last one to arrive. Moss covers Vogue UK, on average, twice a year. And it’s been that way for two decades. Moss IS Vogue UK.

wenn24040230

Demi Moore also wore Dundas for Cavalli. This is kind of tragic. Why are the sleeves so long?!

wenn24040148

Alexa Chung in Prada. I’m fine with the gold tin foil dress, but WHY did she pair it with black polka-dotted pantyhose and black pumps? Tragic.

wenn24040047

Bonus David Gandy, arguably the biggest male model in the world. And plus he’s hot.

wenn24040090

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

63 Responses to “Kim Kardashian in Cavalli at the Vogue 100 London event: tragic or sexy?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. SM says:

    Jesus. I was trying to have lunch. Horrible

  2. Alix says:

    With Kim, the answer is almost ALWAYS “tragic”.

    La Moss is starting to look tired/haggard, and she’s only in her very early 40s, correct? Hard livin’.

    Will never, ever understand the appeal of Alexa Chung.

    • BengalCat2000 says:

      I think Kate looks great. She doesn’t look like she’s had work done. Hell, I’d take a few extra lines to have lived her awesome life! I just love her.
      Alexa Chung mystifies me. How is she a thing? No words for Kim, ugh.

      • Kitten says:

        Yeah Kate’s gorgeous.

        I really think Kim’s has some liposculpting (or something) done recently. I don’t believe that she magically reshaped her body so quickly.

      • AnnaKist says:

        It really is weird how Kim’s body changes so much from day to day. One day she looks so much slimmer, as in these photos, and the next she’s back to looking much heavier. I’m sure she’s had lipo-something, but am also wondering if she has her own photographer/s at these events, who photoshop her photos before they’re released? I wouldn’t put it past her.

      • teacakes says:

        Alexa used to be a lot of fun in her Popworld presenter days – yeah, she got in the papers for dating Alex Turner, but I know girls my age (early 20s) genuinely loved her style, And she used to happily take the mick out of her interviewees, which was always good to watch.

  3. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    Kim should have been told to go home and put on some drawers. How have we gotten to a place where it’s ok to wear that? I’m not talking about morality, I’m talking about taste.

  4. Kate says:

    Kim needs to lose her biggest accessory, Kanye. She’s a pretty woman, empty headed, but pretty. She’s made her career being a bit of a happy go lucky ding bat and he’s ruined that for her. Now she’s sour and morose looking. I was never a fan, but the old Kim always seemed up for a good time. They just take themselves way too seriously.
    I hate this dress. The naked trend can die now. We’ve seen everyone’s naughty bits enough now.

  5. Patricia says:

    I actually like this dress on her. I do wish she would ditch the scarf. For someone who’s always trying to look taller she doesn’t understand that cutting herself at the neck with chokers or a scarf like that makes her look much shorter.
    There’s also something weird going on under the belt, like some ring of fat is created under the belt. She isn’t fat at all, her figure is great, but this belt is doing something weird to her. It just looks a little off.
    If she lost the scarf and the fit was a little better I would say this is a knockout look. Close, Kim! I’m rooting for her to come out looking drop dead amazing one of these days. Why am I rooting for Kim? One of the mysteries of the universe.

  6. paolanqar says:

    THIN??
    You can see her ass sprouting from the belt!
    I can’t wait for this trend of sheer gowns to end. They all look incredibly tacky, especially when the boobs are squashed under the nude fabric and they end up looking flat and square.

  7. Jegede says:

    So that Vogue UK cover is 100% coming this year Alex?.

  8. LAK says:

    1. I’m surprised Sienna Miller wasn’t in attendance.

    2. Gosh, that Johnny Borrell cover( behind Demi. Shared with Natalia V). I wonder what happened to him.

  9. Rach says:

    Love Alexas dress! Love it even more because she’s got polka dot tights!

  10. Snazzy says:

    I think it could have been a pretty dress if it had lining in it .. but because it doesn’t, it’s just trashy.

  11. paolanqar says:

    Joan Rivers was SO right when she asked Alexa Chung how gets laid given her dress sense and style.

  12. Cure says:

    I wonder in the fashion world and with other celebrities, do they actually take her serious? She seems like a nice person but i couldn’t take her seriously. Its like shes kayne’s live Armenian barbie

  13. SleepyJane says:

    Her nose looks better. Less overdone. I wonder if she added filler to it or something.

    Her dress is okay. One of the least disastrous choices during the Kanye era.

  14. Fran says:

    Ha! Weight LOSS? More like weight LIPOSUCTION! All those “dermatologist”sessions are paying off. LMAO

  15. DavidGandyFTW says:

    David Gandy at the end of it makes up for the Kardashian BS.

    Cant believe they are letting someone at Vogue events who got famous for being pissed on in a homevideo.

  16. SilkyMalice says:

    Why Kim, WHY?? That dress is hilarious. I laughed out loud.

  17. Emily says:

    David is the only one who looks good here.

    Why has Kim decided this is her look? She looks awful, all the time. She’s even wearing a scarf/choker. She’s always trying to squeeze herself into something and the result isn’t “tight and sexy”, which is what I think she’s going for, but “looking like it’s about to rip open”.

  18. MylaRoma says:

    Tragic. I just saw her close up picture of her face on popsugar. All i thought of was,how can a person butcher herself so much to look like a sex doll. In my opinion,she is not trying to be Amber but Paris Hilton. Yet many awards will be organised n she will be awarded for being what? A famewhore? Murica!

    Rant over.

  19. LizLemonGotMarried says:

    OK, I love the shape and the detailing of Kim’s gown. Imagine if it was lined, with all that gorgeous work in gold and black on cream. I think it would be one of the best looks she’s ever worn. It actually FITS her.

  20. Nancy says:

    Are the days of dressing elegantly gone. Oops forgot who I was talking about. If it isn’t about overexposure to the point of repulsiveness, Kim’s head would spin off. She is so lost in herself and her attempt to be a sex goddess, if only to herself. Undergarments were made for a reason, she is disgusting. Someone upthread mentioned her being a sex doll, wonder if Kanye places her in the box she came in at the end of the night. Tragic

  21. Bettyrose says:

    Why bother with a dress when a bikini wax and body glitter would produce the same effect?

  22. Suzy from Ontario says:

    Kim’s outfit is horrible. I hate that all she seems to wear are these bland colours. It’s all blands together and yes, I mean blands not blends, with her skin and she just looks…bleh. She’s a pretty girl and I think she’d look great in some bright vibrant colours with some bright lipstick, and something where she isn’t squeezed into things where she looks like a stuffed sausage, or with her boobs overflowing everywhere. They may consider themselves fashion experts, but imo, Kanye’s taste for Kim (and apparently she dresses in what he wants) does her no favours.

  23. tracking says:

    Again with the clothing that simply does nothing for her body type. Ugh.

  24. Sue says:

    Okay I am asking this…… Are we looking at her naked crotch or is there some type of covering? I notice there are no pictures from behind…..

  25. TheOtherViv says:

    LOVE me some David but his sleeves always look like they are going to pop at any minute. He either needs to work his triceps/biceps less or start wearing bigger jackets. Oh well, just take it off, we’re fine with that.

  26. Tredd says:

    What’s with standing with your legs apart? Maybe, just MAYBE, in 25 more pounds…weird.

    Kanye looks RIDICULOUS with the light colored/contrasting boots.

  27. Quinn says:

    GROSS.

    There is honestly NOTHING sexy about Kim Kardashian. NOTHING. Maybe because there’s nothing honest about her face or body at this point.

  28. haley1020 says:

    such a sham marriage lol

  29. MiniMii says:

    Take away the horrible belt, the neck wrap, and the pancake’d boobs and she’d actually look decent.

    And am I imagining it, or is her ass getting a tad smaller? I think the giant ass trend is dying out, same as the trend for gigantic fake boobs is now passe. Maybe that’s why she’s been covering it so much in long coats, she’s was waiting for it to deflate somewhat.