George Takei: It’s ‘really unfortunate’ that Sulu will be Star Trek’s first gay character

youcanpee
The spoilers are in the title, I’m sorry! Mild spoilers for Star Trek: Beyond below
Out of all the celebrities on Facebook, I see more legitimate re-posts from George Takei than anyone else. (I’m phrasing it like that due to the sponsored re-posts.) People just really like the clever things he says and the memes he shares. Takei has been a vocal advocate for gay rights, he’s been out since 2005 and he’s genuinely beloved. So that’s why you would think it would be a no-brainer that Star Trek’s first gay character would be Sulu, whom Takei played throughout the show’s original three season run, from 1966 to 1969.

Screenwriter Simon Peg (he also plays Scotty) and director Justin Lin made the decision to make Sulu gay in the upcoming Star Trek: Beyond in homage to Takei. Only Takei, 79 (?!), says that was never creator Gene Rodenberry’s vision for that character and that Sulu has an entire backstory that makes him a heterosexual man. In a new interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Takei says that while he’s “delighted” that there will be a gay character in the new Star Trek movie he also thinks it’s a large departure from Rodenberry’s vision. What’s more is that Takei told John Cho, who plays Sulu, that the character was never meant to be gay and that doing so would be a disservice to both Rodenberry and the character, as it puts him firmly in the closet for the rest of the timeline. This movie is in fact a prequel, meaning that Sulu would have been closeted throughout his life, which Takei finds unreasonable. Takei said that he had conversations with Cho and with director Lin and urged them not to take the character in that direction but that it happened anyway.

“[Rodenberry] was a strong supporter of LGBT equality,” recalls Takei, now 79. “But he said he has been pushing the envelope [by featuring the first televised interracial kiss in 1968] and walking a very tight rope — and if he pushed too hard, the show would not be on the air.” Alas, the show was canceled the following season anyway.

But Star Trek has lived long and prospered for studio home Paramount, spawning six TV series and 13 feature films. True to its title, the latest big-screen outing, Star Trek Beyond, has gone where none have gone before: Star John Cho — who assumes the Sulu mantle for the third time in the reboots — has told Australia’s Herald Sun that the character is revealed to be gay.

The idea came from Simon Pegg, who plays Scotty in the new films and penned the Beyond screenplay, and director Justin Lin, both of whom wanted to pay homage to Takei’s legacy as both a sci-fi icon and beloved LGBT activist.

And so a scene was written into the new film, very matter-of-fact, in which Sulu is pictured with a male spouse raising their infant child. Pegg and Lin assumed, reasonably, that Takei would be overjoyed at the development — a manifestation of that conversation with Roddenberry in his swimming pool so many years ago.

Except Takei wasn’t overjoyed. He had never asked for Sulu to be gay. In fact, he’d much prefer that he stay straight. “I’m delighted that there’s a gay character,” he tells The Hollywood Reporter. “Unfortunately, it’s a twisting of Gene’s creation, to which he put in so much thought. I think it’s really unfortunate.”

Takei explains that Roddenberry was exhaustive in conceiving his Star Trek characters. (The name Sulu, for example, was based on the Sulu Sea off the coast of the Philippines, so as to render his Asian nationality indeterminate.) And Roddenberry had always envisioned Sulu as heterosexual.

Proving that is not so simple a matter, however. Sulu never had an onscreen love interest during Star Trek’s initial three-season run. He did mention a daughter, Demora, who appeared in 1994’s Star Trek Generations, the seventh film in the series (she was played by Jacqueline Kim).

But the only reference to how Demora was conceived appears in a secondary canonical source: the 1995 Star Trek novel The Captain’s Daughter. “It was, to put it crudely, a one-night stand with a glamazon,” Takei explains. “A very athletic, powerful and stunningly gorgeous woman. That’s Demora’s mother.”

Takei first learned of Sulu’s recent same-sex leanings last year, when Cho called him to reveal the big news. Takei tried to convince him to make a new character gay instead. “I told him, ‘Be imaginative and create a character who has a history of being gay, rather than Sulu, who had been straight all this time, suddenly being revealed as being closeted.'” (Takei had enough negative experiences inside the Hollywood closet, he says, and strongly feels a character who came of age in the 23rd century would never find his way inside one.)

His timeline logic, however, is enough to befuddle even the most diehard of Trek enthusiasts, as the rebooted trilogy takes place before the action of the original series. In other words, assuming canon orthodoxy, this storyline suggest Sulu would have had to have first been gay and married, only to then go into the closet years later.

Not long after Cho’s bombshell call came another, this one from Lin, again informing that Sulu was indeed to be gay in Star Trek Beyond. Takei remained steadfastly opposed to the decision.

“I said, ‘This movie is going to be coming out on the 50th anniversary of Star Trek, the 50th anniversary of paying tribute to Gene Roddenberry, the man whose vision it was carried us through half a century. Honor him and create a new character. I urged them. He left me feeling that that was going to happen,” Takei says…

After that, all was quiet from Beyond until a few months ago, when Takei received an email from Pegg “praising me for my advocacy for the LGBT movement and for my pride in Star Trek,” he says. “And I thought to myself, ‘How wonderful! It’s a fan letter from Simon Pegg. Justin had talked to him!'” Takei was certain the creative team had rethought their decision to make Sulu gay.

That is until one month ago, when he received an email from Cho informing him that the actor was about to embark on an international media tour for Beyond. Cho said it was bound to come out that his character was gay, and “what should he do?” A disappointed Takei told Cho to go about his promotional duties, but that he was “not going to change” his mind on the matter.

“I really tried to work with these people when at long last the issue of gay equality was going to be addressed,” Takei says. “I thought after that conversation with Justin that was going to happen. Months later, when I got that email from Simon Pegg, I was kind of confused. He thinks I’m a great guy? Wonderful. But what was the point of that letter? I interpreted that as my words having been heard.”

[From The Hollywood Reporter]

I get it. It doesn’t add up with Rodenberry’s vision for Star Trek or with the character Takei knows so well. His loyalty lies with Rodenberry and with the integrity of the series, and there’s something admirable about that. Still, it’s nice that Star Trek will have a gay character and it sounds like Pegg and Lin’s hearts were in the right place. They just didn’t communicate well enough with Takei ahead of time and made assumptions instead of listening.

The Hollywood Reporter also reminds us that a new Star Trek series will premiere on CBS this January. Takei said that he’d like to make a cameo in some capacity. “There’s no reason why an ancient, wise Admiral Sulu can’t appear, or maybe an alien creature who sounds like me. That should be fun.

sulu

johnchosulu

wenn23303756

photos credit: WENN.com

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

39 Responses to “George Takei: It’s ‘really unfortunate’ that Sulu will be Star Trek’s first gay character”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Pinky says:

    I agree with his point and it surprises me Justin Lin, et al, did not hear what he was saying. Actually, I take it back. It doesn’t surprise me at all.

    –TheRealPinky

  2. aims says:

    I love George!! I’m one of many who’s a Facebook friend of his and he’s lovely. I think we need to have all people represented in film. I also feel Simon has the best of intention.

  3. Joy says:

    It just feels lazy to make an established character gay. I agree, create a new persona.

    • detritus says:

      Takei worked hard to have Sulu come across as straight. He very much separated his personal life from Sulu’s. I get that Sulu is almost synonymous with Takei, but don’t let his personal life bleed into his character. That’s clearly not what he wanted.

      Someone on another board brought up Kirk as bi instead, and I am down with that. Kind of Jack Harkness style. It would fit with the character better imo.

      Cho is such a class act to ask Takei about things. In fact class act all around, and general vampire. Dude is 42 or something.

      • orangecrush says:

        I agree, well said.

        John Cho is 44 and I think he is super hot. I like him even more now that I know he asked for Takei’s input.

  4. cyn says:

    I love this man so much. I think they should have listened to him. This is his character that he knows more intimately than anyone alive today. I find it disrespectful that he voiced his dismay and reasoning behind it and they chose to believe that they knew better than he did. I agree with him. They should have used their creativity you make a kick ass new character.

  5. Red32 says:

    I respect his opinion, but the new Star Trek movies have already changed so much from the original Trek. This doesn’t seem as significant as say, killing off Spock’s mother and almost every Vulcan in existence.

  6. Lucy says:

    You know, I was ready to just roll my eyes at his statement (I must admit I’m not familiar with Mr Takei’s life) but after reading it through, I get it, and I even agree. I’m sure Simon means well, but I don’t know that this is the way to do it.

  7. The Eternal Side-Eye says:

    Honestly I do think there’s a laziness in trying to cram all the ‘minorities’ into one character. Which is to say execs and producers often take the easy route of choosing to make one minority character be all the things when they could choose to display two different characters with different facets to their personality that aren’t often given equal screen time.

    It’s like saying “Well we’re only going to have one token (and yes I’m aware of Zoe) might as well make him gay/handicap/learning disabled too”

    It’s something we’ve seen a lot. Of course happy to see more representation but more means MORE, not the same amount. That being said John Cho will knock this out of the park and look amazing with his husband and baby.

    • tealily says:

      I didn’t take it that way at all. When I first read about it, before seeing Takei’s statement, I thought “oh, what a great tribute to George Takei!” People in real life sometime represent more than one minority. In this instance, it doesn’t feel shoehorned in to me, it feels very natural.

    • Naya says:

      Good observation. Said individual is never the star either. Just an ancillary character because they may need to limit her/his screen time if the audience doesnt respond positively to her/him.

  8. RuddyZooKeeper says:

    It’s not that he thinks Sulu didn’t have the capacity or whatever to be gay, but he knows the character well enough to be convinced that Sulu would NEVER have been a closeted gay man. Can we not respect that the actor who embodied the character and had a personal relationship with the man who wrote and invented the character would know this to be true?

    Even when someone’s heart is in the right place (I’m looking at you Pegg and Lin), they can still be so intent on “helping” and patting their own backs that they end up taking a crap all over something they should have left well alone. If Takei said to leave Sulu alone, they should have left him alone.

  9. lisa2 says:

    We were having a conversation on the Matt Damon thread about changing characters to a modern concept. Sulu was not gay. And now once again in the reboot they are changing the history of a character that anyone that has seen the series knows. I have seen every episode of the original series and the Next Generation. I am a true blue fan.. and this whole reinvention makes me mad. Sad that Gene is not around. I think he would have a lot to say.

    Star Trek as a series addressed so many issues.. and it opened your eyes to issues in a different way. They already changed Spock and Uhura. So no these are not the characters I knew and know.

  10. Jwoolman says:

    This also feeds into the mythology that a gay man can’t play a heterosexual character, which of course Takei clearly could. Making Sulu married to a man not only is way out of continuity for the series, as Takei says it violates the whole backstory that was created for the character. Backstories are important for actors.

    It was really disrespectful pursuing this change when Takei was repeatedly so articulate about why it was a bad idea. Creating a new character would have made much more sense.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      That is my thought as well. Takei, a gay man, convincingly portrayed a straight man, and he has lived with the character of Sulu for 50 years. If Pegg really needed one of the characters to be gay, why not his own Scotty character? Or is he not comfortable?

      George Takei is a national treasure. He grew up in an internment camp, one of the darkest chapters of US history, yet still demonstrates a tremendous love for our country. His efforts to bring attention to that time, with the goal of education for prevention of future mistakes is admirable. And his “Boldly Go!” Videos for the Social Security administration, teaching elders how to manage their accounts on-line, are fantastic

      • Naya says:

        “If Pegg really needed one of the characters to be gay, why not his own Scotty character? Or is he not comfortable?”

        It says somuch about him that even after Takeis objections he didnt consider writing Scotty as gay or bi instead.

  11. Bobo says:

    I wish Hollywood would understand this, and it’s disappointing to see Lin and Cho go through with this, even with good intentions. Minorities don’t want to steal white/straight/etc. characters. Hollywood seems to love changing old icons – how about making new ones? No no, that would be too simple…

  12. tealily says:

    When I first heard this was happening I though “Oh, George Takei must be so happy. That would have meant so much to him at the time he was playing the role.” It makes me super sad that he isn’t in to this. The timeline part makes sense, but is it really that important? (I guess to some people it is.)

  13. mkyarwood says:

    Simon Pegg is terrible in these flicks. The writing isn’t that great. I can just see him thinking this up and being like ‘oh, won’t everyone love me for this.’ Maybe they should bring in Nick Frost to see if the ideas work then…

    • Ally8 says:

      I’m horrified that Pegg was tasked with writing. Gives you a sense of how much of a (non) priority the script is.

      I’m not a Trekker/Trekkie and I enjoy these movies as good popcorn flicks. I think they have succeeded because it’s fun to see a big budget and action-flick-know-how applied to the Star Trek characters. But really it would have been more honest to create a whole new set of characters and work with that, because they’ve thrown out 90% of what was unique, subtle and interesting about the Star Trek universe.

  14. Irene says:

    While I understand Takei’s point, in the end, there’s going to be a positive, non-stereotypical gay action hero character in a billion dollar Hollywood franchise. I can’t hate it. I can’t be angry about it. All I’ve seen since the announcement is a million people being SO excited for representation in a movie series they adore. I can only see this as a wonderful thing.

    • tealily says:

      This is kind of how I’m viewing it as well. Although it sucks that George isn’t behind the idea.

  15. Robin says:

    Most of the characters on the original series never had a love story, so their sexuality was never addressed. The sex and romance on TOS, such as it was, almost entirely focussed on Kirk horning his way around the galaxy. The original Sulu wasn’t “closeted”; his sexuality, like that of the vast majority of the characters, was never part of an episode. I have no problem with the PTB choosing Sulu to be a gay character, and I don’t think Takei is coming off well here. It’s almost like he’s jealous that John Cho’s Sulu gets to have the plotline, and Takei’s does not.

  16. lucy2 says:

    At first I was surprised to read he wasn’t happy about it, but then seeing his reasons, I think he makes total sense. It’s a shame the writers didn’t listen to him. I appreciate the thought behind it, but it sounds like they didn’t handle it as best as they could.

  17. Thaisajs says:

    This doesn’t bother me nearly as much as watching them turn Uhura into basically the girlfriend. She was NEVER the girlfriend. But in the new movies she just runs around looking worried about Spock.

  18. Colette says:

    Well you know being gay is a choice.Sulu decided to be gay.
    #sarcasm
    They should have created a new character.

  19. Marianne says:

    But I don’t think this means that Sulu is closeted. From what I’ve read he will have a husband and a child. That doesn’t sound like someone in the closet. Its pretty reasonable to explain that it hasn’t come up before because Sulu prefers to keep his private life private when he’s at work. I mean, its not like we’ve seen Sulu outside of the Federation.

    Also, while I am fan of the recent Star Trek films, I haven’t seen much of the original series or the original cast movies. But again, from what I’ve read its not like his sexuality was never mentioned. He did have a daughter, but its not like gay people can’t have children. So while he wasn’t written as gay, its not like he was written as straight either.

    *Shrugs*.

  20. Original kay says:

    It’s interesting to read people saying ” be true to the character the way the creator wanted ” against all the “we need a new non white man James Bond” that was rampant on this site.

    Hypocrisy at its worst? Best?

    They changed the movies when they changed the timeline. They changed a lot- how pike dies, khan, Spock/Uhura relationship etc etc

    i liked the idea of a gay man playing a straight man, and a straight man playing a gay one.

    Not team George on this one.

  21. paranormalgirl says:

    Aren’t the new films taking place in an alternate timeline?

    • Persephone says:

      Yes and no which is part of the problem, it isn’t an entirely different timeline it splits off on it’s own path at the time of Kirk’s birth. Which means they’ve tied themselves to everything in the canon up to that point.

  22. Murphy says:

    George is just the best

  23. Jezza says:

    As a longtime trekker, I side with George’s POV on this. I know it’s an alternate time line and whatever, but these characters have been around for over 50 years. Established and well known. The writers had a great opportunity with this reboot to intoduce a character of their own that they could have be whatever they want. If they want to leave their mark in the Star Trek Universe, that is how it’s done. Not changing well known characters.

  24. North of Boston says:

    I’m finding it interesting to consider this situation in comparison to discussions I’ve seen about adding a gay character to the Marvel films. In the case of Marvel, I’ve seen many folks argue that they’d rather Marvel reveal one of the existing characters as being gay or bi (Captain America is often the popular choice for that, despite his history romantic relationships/flirtations with women in the comics and onscreen), rather than have Marvel introduce a new character to the films who just happens to be gay. I got the sense that some people felt limiting gay characters to new characters was a way of including them, yet marginalizing them at the same time.

    But Takei makes a compelling case here for the opposite approach. There is something to be said for respecting the history and backstory of a character, and from all I’ve seen and what Takei says here, Sulu has never been gay; plus he makes a very good point about it being very unlikely that Sulu would have been closeted throughout his long Trek history. Introducing a new compelling character who happens to be gay might be a better approach in this case. I’m with Takei on this one.

  25. Meadow says:

    I’m not sure why George is surprised, after all they twisted Rodenberry’s vision of Spock upside down, inside out and to hell and back with his Uhura sexcapades.