Us Weekly: Tom Hiddleston is going to propose to Taylor Swift ‘very soon’

us weekly tiddles

CB and I were just talking about how The Glorious Tiddlebanging of 2016 has made this summer so much fun. I may complain sometimes, but honestly, I’m enjoying this couple so much. I think Tom Hiddleston’s career is going to be in tatters when all is said and done, but the end might not be coming as soon as people think. Why is that? Because according to Us Weekly says Tom is going to propose to Taylor Swift very soon. YAAASSSSS.

Taylor Swift is living her own love story. Life with boyfriend Tom Hiddleston “has been a dream come true,” a Swift source says in the new issue of Us Weekly. “He’s so romantic, classic and chivalrous, and he’s doing everything right.”

His grandest gesture has yet to come. After a whirlwind month of dating that included jaunts to England, Italy and Australia, a Hiddleston insider says the 35-year-old Brit is ready to upgrade his relationship status. “Tom is planning to propose very soon,” says the insider. And the 10-time Grammy winner, 26, has her answer prepared. “She would definitely say yes,” says the Swift source.

His devotion has floored Swift. “Taylor’s totally into him,” says the Swift source. “She is so swept off her feet.”

[From Us Weekly]

There’s no real roadmap here. Tom’s history doesn’t indicate one way or the other if he’s the type of guy to propose to The One after only dating her for a month. He’s obviously been in serious relationships before (poor JArthy), but he’s been doing the bachelor thing for a while, and maybe “his light is on,” to use the Sex and the City concept. Like, he just decided that he’s ready for marriage. And Taylor was the first person he saw. So, is he really ring-shopping? God, that would make this summer even better.

Tom also tweeted this a few hours ago:

Tell that to your Taymerica squad, baby.

Pretty cool runnings

A photo posted by Cara Delevingne (@caradelevingne) on

Cover courtesy of Us Weekly, additional photos courtesy of Instagram, Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

373 Responses to “Us Weekly: Tom Hiddleston is going to propose to Taylor Swift ‘very soon’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. akua says:

    Plz let it be true, so why do some of this fan think Taylor force in in a private relationship. Oh she better be pregnant, come on taytay make me happy.

    • Fran says:

      boobs are getting bigger, you never know!

    • Lana 567 says:

      I sooo hope this is true just to see the hiddlestoners lose their shit. I hope the wedding is big and splashy. That last pic of him on the slide with those girls Lolololololol

  2. shelly says:

    I wonder if she’ll stump up the money for the ring, it would have to be pretty special.

    This will be so funny, if true TH fan girls on suicide watch and tweeny Swift fans in a lather over THE dress.

    Please gossip Gods, make it so.

    • browniecakes says:

      I’d go one step further and say she’ll be doing the proposing. It will happen before bff Abigail gets married.

    • Westiesheepie says:

      He’s not exactly poor! He’s worth $20million. I think he can afford a ring.

      • LadyLoo says:

        He is not worth $20 mil. Not by a long shot. The website you’re getting that from has no proof for those numbers.

      • delorb says:

        If he were worth 20 million, then why is he so desperate?

      • Colete says:

        He’s probably worth less than $10M but regardless he can afford a ring.

      • WhatTheHell? says:

        20 mill is a gross overestimate of Hiddles net worth. His house is worth a few mill, I’m sure, but he hasn’t been getting multimillion dollar paychecks for his indy and BBC work. Not even Marvel, if they bumped up his pay or bonused him after RDJ’s backend deals were revealed, would be paying him anything totaling that amount.

        It’s probably closer to 10 mil.

        Still a nice chunk of change to have, but nowhere near what Swift has as a touring performer and songwriter, along with merchandise income.

      • LinaLamont says:

        @delorb

        Because some people have a pathological need for celebrity/attention.

        Who hurt you, Tom?

        🙂

        Taylor, too. Although, I suspect hers comes from ridiculously indulgent parents.

  3. Sixer says:

    Vicar of Dibley wedding, please! Or it’s not allowed to happen. Here is what the bride should wear:

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/16/17/a1/1617a1876665a5e6db826e7ea431115f.jpg

    • shelly says:

      That Vicar of Dibley pic, whilst excellent, is a bit restrained for my liking…A hello Kitty theme with cats ears headdress would be in order I think.

      • Sixer says:

        You kinda have to watch the whole episode to appreciate the full glory of that wedding. It’s on YouTube and it is genuinely hilarious!

      • Lostmymind says:

        I’d take Richard Armitage over Hiddles, too.

      • ClaireB says:

        @Lostmymind, you said Richard Armitage and I literally said, “Oooh,” and melted a bit. Hiddles is like cut-price Armitage.

      • Lostmymind says:

        I was actually referring to the wedding where the vicar married RA. I didn’t click the link. But that wedding was funny, too.
        Richard Armitage……yum…

      • Tulip Garden says:

        “Vicar…” Also available on Netflix! The more you know 💫

      • bunny_ears says:

        NOOOOOOOOOOOO. Not VoD! If they do that dress I will never laugh at the silliness b/c Tiddles ruined it. =/

    • lilacflowers says:

      Taylor would love that dress.

    • bettyrose says:

      Haahahahaaaahhaaaahaaaaaahaaaahahaaa!!

    • Micki says:

      Sixer: How about that:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMfc_qWJJp0

      I love the Vicar of Dibley. I don’t think Tiddles is on that level of amazingness though.

    • Sixer says:

      We could plan this wedding for them, couldn’t we?

      It would be EPIC.

      • cyn says:

        No. Anne Wintour shall be wedding planner. It shall be the cotton candy wedding of every little American girl’s dream. The Archbishop of Canterbury shall perform the service under the watchful eye of the Queen, who will have been kidnapped and drugged by Taylor’s squad of bodyguards. Taylor’s girl squad shall be dressed in horrible poofy dresses. Mama Hiddleston will be held at gunpoint to insure Tom’s participation. Benedict shall be banned due to his inability to stop cackling. Glorious it shall be.

      • Lucy says:

        Cyn, I’m gonna need you to sneak some Loki costume somewhere in there…

      • Sixer says:

        If Dawn French isn’t officiating, can we make it Dame Edna Everage?

      • Dara says:

        One of Taylor’s cats as ring-bearer. It can wear Loki’s helmet with the rings perched on the end the horns.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        I need Eddie Izzard in here somewhere. Also can’t wait for the action shots of Frisky and Tabby tackling Benny the Bouncer after he jumps between the photographer and the bride five too many times.

      • Sixer says:

        Izzard can be an usher if you like.

        What song for the bride to come down the aisle to?

      • shelly says:

        ‘What song for the bride to come down the aisle to?’

        Blank space, if TH gets cold feet and jilts her.

      • cyn says:

        The ushers shall be dressed in Loki costumes and Eddie Izzard shall deliver the prayer. We may have a problem in that Eddie’s dress might overshadow the bride’s. Lilacflowers, will Colin be available to assist? (Speaking of, is it Colin Farrell or Firth because I have been imagining Firth.)

      • cyn says:

        Sixer Dame Edna shall sing. What I don’t know but am seriously thinking that Taylor herself shall perform “My Heart will go on” as she walks down the aisle to prove to everyone that she is a much better singer than that Celine person.

      • Sixer says:

        Does the best man have to make jokes about all the other wedding participants during his speech in US weddings?

        If so, I’m offering loads of fudge for a good joke.

      • cyn says:

        Sixer, first we need to decide who the best man shall be since Cumby is out due to his blatant, gleeful disregard for importance of the Hiddleswift union. We must know in order for the jokes to be on point. I would say Idris due to him being there when they first met but I see him having a Cumby like reaction and being banned as well for excessive snickering. My heart’s wish is for Piers Morgan to be best man. Can you imagine the toast? (Never have I put the words “heart’s wish” and “Piers Morgan” in the same sentence. It’s kinda freaking me out)

        (Side note: You just know that Cumberbatch and Cavill are thanking God for the diversion that is Hiddleswift because NOTHING they have ever done remotely compares.)

      • Sixer says:

        He’s a feminist so he’ll have a best woman instead: Elsa Pataky!

      • Sarah says:

        If Eddie Izzard is back in drag, he can be a bridesmaid. Even better!! Love him!!

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @Cyn, Firth.

    • what's inside says:

      Lord all mighty, you do not even have to wait a few years to stare in horror and wonder “what were you thinking????!!!!!”

    • BritAfrica says:

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

      Oh Sixer, you’ve done it now! Off to YouTube I go to hunt for that episode….

    • Erinn says:

      Being the person that I am – I remember coming back from a party in freshman year of college while quite tipsy saying “No. I’m done partying. I NEED TO WATCH VICAR OF DIBLEY”

      • BTownGirl says:

        When I first got Netflix and it popped up in my suggestions, I called my Mom and yelled into the phone for like three continuous minutes, I was so excited hahaha! Whenever I’ve had a wretched day, I relive the whole Uncle Simon fiasco and the resultant banner…and I feel so much better 😉

    • BTownGirl says:

      *Jim Trott Voice* No, no, no, no….YES!
      p.s. Thank you for making my day!! 🙂

    • Maria_ says:

      Lol! Best groom ever! omg!! i still don´t understand why is no Richard Armitage the next Bond (XD sorry off topic but im in love with him)

      https://i.ytimg.com/vi/R_Cqve8cWVU/hqdefault.jpg

      and her squad too :-p

    • lilacflowers says:

      I have to admit that Vicar of Dilby gives me life. When I was hospitalized over a weekend for my second cancer surgery, the local PBS station was doing a marathon of it. I had never seen it before and spent what were two of the scariest days of my life blissfully distracted by it.

    • Tara says:

      THE best weddings ever. Alice’s dress was hilarious but weirdly enchanting.

    • Secret squirrel says:

      This is completely freaky as I got home from work today, popped on the TV and loaded up Celebitchy for the latest on Tiddles. On TV right now is Vicar of Dibley AND it’s the episode that she first meets Harry (Richard Armitage). Coincidence or omen??

    • Kate says:

      That is my all time favorite show and also my favorite episode!

  4. Luca76 says:

    Lolz I’m a believer in Hiddleswift they are perfect for eachother in some odd, awkward, cheesy, cringey way. I totally could see them being together forever (at least Hollywood forever 3 or 4 years).

    • K.C. says:

      They really are. Every time people question why they’d be interested in one another I’m like, “Seriously? They’re like the same person.” Looking beyond the different cultural backgrounds and different education levels, they’re awfully alike personality-wise. VERY alike. They’re headed for Hollywood forever, for sure. That’s just my opinion though—I don’t really look to Us Weekly for reliable news, lol.

      Considering Taylor is known for having short relationships, it would actually be funny if she ended up having a really long, happy marriage.

      • shelly says:

        Yep its hard to dislike them, but they are an endless source of fun….This is Disney level romance.

      • daisie-b says:

        They are like two halves of the same person. I think the fact that he doesn’t have a string of bimbo exes bodes well for a long and happy relationship. The tank top said it all. No reporter or pap has to ask him if she is the one. He has made his choice graphically clear.

    • BTownGirl says:

      Seriously, this thirsty, glorious spectacle is my Happy Place and I never want it to end!

      • Ursaline says:

        Agree. I’ve never been much of a fan of hers, but I still think he’s hot despite the The Glorious Tiddlebanging of 2016 (I LOVE that term!). But they are so sickeningly thirsty/deleriously cute that I find myself unconsciously sheering them on for more giddy future embarrassing PDA. Definitely makes the summer more fun. 😀

      • BTownGirl says:

        For real, as soon as I saw them dancing (and I use that term loosely) at the Met Gala…I was sold. Big T looks like he’s doing Gob Bluth’s chicken dance and I need a wedding out of these two based on that alone 😉

  5. Spugzbunny says:

    If this isn’t a music video I will eat my shoe!

  6. Grace says:

    MY EYES MY EYES

    That water fun park picture makes me feel like I’ve seen something I shouldn’t have

    A marriage proposal after a month? Sure. Wireder things have happened.

    • HH says:

      That photo… I had to scroll back up to make sure I saw what I thought I saw. Shouldn’t have done that.

      They seem like they are in the honeymoon phase. That’s like the best and scariest part of the relationship (at least in my experience). In terms of dating, you’re never more in love (or “in like”) with someone than in that phase. Things you go through afterwards cement or break your feelings for that person, but the honeymoon phase is full on lovefest.

    • shelly says:

      That water slide picture makes the intended groom look about 78…Presumably it was released with Swift’s O.K. It doesn’t do him any favours at all.

      I’d be well pissed off about that, if I were him.

    • Mia V. says:

      He’s giving me the Ross vibes when he dates that younger girl and when they broke up she throws water ballons at him.

      • Ursaline says:

        OMG! The Ross vibes! *Cringe* 😀 😀 😀

      • Kelly says:

        Oh yes Ross vibes all the way – either relationship – Ross with the college student (which got him in trouble career-wise as he was her teacher) or Emily (they got married within 6 weeks of knowing each other.) Ross and Emily went on 1 date and ended up on a weekend getaway together. Maybe they are huge Friends devotees.

      • Annetommy says:

        Maybe Hiddles could accidentally say JArthy’s name at the altar…

  7. Sixer says:

    Also, LEGS has finally cemented his new position as the internet’s Cockwomble of Cringe. Use of emoticons is incompatible with his previous incarnation as Intellectual but Humble Thespian.

    The transformation is complete!

    Now all we need is the wedding and some babies for dressing up and photographing for Instagram. Can they shorten the human gestation period so that I can enjoy these pictures next week, I wonder?

    • juice says:

      with the speed they’ve moved this relationship along at, i wouldn’t be surprised if they managed to shorten pregnancy to a week. it would better fit their timeline!

    • lilacflowers says:

      They could adopt next week.

    • Sixer says:

      I think it’s the least they could do for us.

      And My Little Pony must be the dressing up them for the first baby Instagram photo.

      • Bonzo says:

        I think it would be SO TIDDLES for them to adopt a pony together and Insta the announcement to everyone.

    • BritAfrica says:

      But how did I get him so wrong?? I guess I had seen him in ‘The Hollow Crown’ and just assumed ‘thespian’. Then I saw him again in TNM.

      This is a whole different person/persona so serves me right – never assume!…

      • Sixer says:

        Everything in Britland is conspiring to let you down of late, BritAfrica, isn’t it?

        I can revel in my years-long history of mocking the LEGS half to death for his twee fakery, at least. Sorry!

      • BritAfrica says:

        I know! Brexit and now this.

        I must have done something really bad in a former life! But hey, I should cheer up, from today we have a WOMAN Prime Minister!

        Kaiser, please feature Theresa May in a thread, only the 2nd FEMALE British PM out of 76 of them in over 200 years!

        Angela Merkel, Theresa May and Hillary Clinton?? Anything is possible! 🙂

      • Sixer says:

        You shouldn’t have said that. Boris Johnson is Foreign Secretary. FOREIGN SECRETARY! I would have had him as Minister for Heavily Foreshadowed Apocalypse.

        Irony is dead. Britain has jumped the shark.

        (Americans: this is the one who said Obama was against Brexit cos Kenyan heritage, has talked about piccaninnies and lord knows what else. He is our Trump. He is our equivalent of your Secretary of State. He is in charge of our DIPLOMACY. Shoot me now.)

      • LinaLamont says:

        @BritAfrica
        “But how did I get him so wrong??”

        https://youtu.be/dmZSkWBJwBU

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @Sixer, in some pictures today, Boris is beginning to resemble Drumpf physically. They seem to share a stylist. I apologize for not burying him under a snow mountain when he was here in Boston during the snowpocalypse called Thor.

      • Sixer says:

        Lilac – Mr Sixer and I honestly fell about laughing before we started crying. I’m so embarrassed. They told your State Department press guy about the appointment just as he was taking questions and even he had to stop himself laughing. SIGH.

      • lilacflowers says:

        @Sixer, is there a third party that has any credibility and potential to take advantage of any of this at all, given that your two major parties seem to be spinning out of earth’s orbit?

        I do have to grudgingly give Boris some credit though for his brilliant take down of Willard Mittens Romney, who never met a transit system he didn’t want to destroy, during the London Olympics. Other than that, he seems to be bordering on raving lunatic. Just like Drumpf.

      • BritAfrica says:

        @ Sixer

        ‘He is in charge of our DIPLOMACY. Shoot me now.)’

        Lol! I really think it’s a little game of tactics here. If TM keeps Bozo close then he can’t plot to take her new job…..

      • Sixer says:

        I will explain Boris’s diplomatic skills by illustration. Here is the limerick he wrote this year about the president of Turkey (and I know we know he is dodgy, but still):

        There was a young fellow from Ankara
        Who was a terrific wankerer
        Till he sowed his wild oats
        With the help of a goat
        But he didn’t even stop to thankera.

      • lilacflowers says:

        Perhaps he should turn his poetic skills to members of his own party with animal partners. Or would that be too many?

      • Sixer says:

        He probably had to do it himself! I can give you this Boris-related Shakespeare skit by my favourite British children’s poet, which cheered me up:

        http://michaelrosenblog.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/another-incredible-shakespeare.html

      • lilacflowers says:

        Delightful. And it is difficult to find anything delightful in any of this.

        Here, Drumpf may be pulling Gingrich back into the political scene. Because what we really need right now is an adulterous jerk who blames all the country’s problems on poverty-stricken women and their children.

      • Sixer says:

        Ah, the good old single mother trope. We know it well.

        3, 2, 1…. (That’s my countdown for his less-than-charming interwebz appreciators to say the word breeders. Is breeder a term of abuse stateside, too?)

      • lilacflowers says:

        Not an oft-used one, but yes, it occasionally pops up. Welfare moms is the term of derision most used. Gingrich, the paragon of “family values” is on his third marriage after cheating on Wives 1 & 2.

      • notasugarhere says:

        I was watching BBC news last night and they could barely keep straight faces when announcing or discussing it.

        He self-presentation reminds me of a deranged muppet.

    • Alex says:

      I laughed so hard at this. Have I enjoyed a PR cringefest or summer romance this much before? I don’t think so.
      Alright everyone get your wedding gear together. This is going to be fun

  8. perplexed says:

    I’m trying to find all of this interesting, but…it’s hard.

    Maybe the divorce will be way more fascinating.

    • Lynnie says:

      Hahahhaha same. It’s just mind boggling that three “adults” would be acting this way. Fame is one hell of a drug.

  9. tracking says:

    I don’t think I’ve ever been more exhausted by celebrity couple coverage, and that’s saying something.

    • toni says:

      You must have missed Bennifer 1.0.

      • LAK says:

        Bennifer 1.0 was glorious and on another level.

        The music video is still one of my favourite things.

        Pamela and Tommy Lee are a close second.

        Twiddle are amateurs in comparison. They aren’t even close to hall of famers Elizabeth and Burton.

      • Sixer says:

        You’re such a wet blanket, LAK. Get on board, woman!

      • Lucy says:

        You’re nothing in the supercouple stakes until you’ve been denounced by the Vatican.

      • perplexed says:

        Bennifer was entertaining. This, not so much.

      • BritAfrica says:

        @ LAK

        Ahhhh……that music video! Actually I could use a laugh right about now as I haven’t been to the block for a while….

      • Ursaline says:

        Yes.. The music video was so beautifully awful. She’s immune by this point, but he’s never going to live that down.

      • Gatita says:

        Bennifer 1.0 predated social media so while it was wall-to-wall on tabloids and TV shows you could easily avoid it if you wanted to. Social media amps everything to +1,111,111.

    • Crox says:

      Klicking on their article and even worse, replying, is what makes the media want to report on them in the first place. So if you don’t want the articles to continue, you have to stop being the faithful customer of their news.

  10. toni says:

    He heard that she made something like 170 Millions of Dollars last year so yeah he totally wants to marry her.

    • K says:

      Say what you will about Taylor but she is smart, if this marriage happens (please god yes it will be so funny) he won’t ever see a penny of that money.

      She’ll have him in the most iron clad prenup of all time.

      • kaiko says:

        yes, this! i always got the impression her parents were behind the brand of Taylor in a big way. they were both financial advisors i think? anyway, she’s got bizsavvy brains in her court…jollies with hiddles ain’t gonna make a dent!

      • Dani says:

        I wouldn’t be so sure. The peen has a blinding effect on many females.

      • Miss Jupitero says:

        Mommy and Daddy Swift (who I think bought her recording company when she was still a kid) will see to the prenup so that she can keep the stars in her eyes.

        That prenup will be as a thick as a complete set of the OED…..

      • Erinn says:

        Dani – I think if anything it’d be a generous pre-nup… but I really really really don’t see her ever marrying someone without one. I mean – I could be wrong, who knows. But I think business wise she’d at least partially protect herself. She’s not the kind of person who’s blowing through as much money as she’s making, and she likes investing in property, so I’d like to think that she’s at least got some money sense.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        I suspect most of Taylor’s money and property is tied up in trusts, which would make it difficult to reach, even without a pre-nup. A pre-nup would then limit access to interest income from those trusts and income earned outside the trusts.

    • boredblond says:

      She tops the new Forbes list of celeb earnings..I was kind of surprised at that..I would love it if they had a quiet, no circus wedding ..the tabs would have a meltdown

      • Dara says:

        Her fans would too. They want to the full Disney-wedding extravaganza – complete with live-streaming of the actual ceremony and endless Instagram coverage by all her friends.

    • TyrantDestroyed says:

      I wonder who would get to achieve living the dream: will it be Tom? Or will it be Miranda Kerr?

    • Annetommy says:

      I still don’t see any evidence that Tom is mercenary and after her money. It’s supposition. It’s hardly an Anna Nicole Smith situation; if Taylor was a 90 year old billionaire I might wonder what the attraction could be other than money. But she’s young and pretty as well as rich.

  11. Anonanon says:

    So Tom tweets with a subtext meaning “don’t believe everything you read”, then a couple of hours later USW run a proposal article. Intriguing

    • Sue says:

      He´s sending SOS to us? 😀

      • Ursaline says:

        Amazing. I definitely have way more fun reading this site than any of the others. He should totally reach out the the Ladies (and Gents) of Celebitchy for PR guidance.

      • Bonzo says:

        DListed has some pretty funny TIDDLES threads too… tho’ they’re more crass & irreverent than we are here. Not for sensitive eyes… like those of kids reading over your shoulder!

      • LinaLamont says:

        Michael K cuts right to the chase. Love reading him.

      • bonzo says:

        Yeah, MK pulls no punches. I think his best lines are usually the ones he’s struck through.

    • Miss Jupitero says:

      He will learn to love his captors.

    • K.C. says:

      “Don’t believe everything you read” could mean:

      1) Don’t believe it’s a PR stunt.
      2) Don’t believe it’s a music video.
      3) Don’t believe one of Taylor’s favorite things about him is that he’s a tea drinker.
      4) Don’t believe it’s the truest love to ever exist in the history of humanity.
      5) Don’t believe the throat cackling.
      6) Don’t believe their hands are superglued together.
      7) Don’t believe their hands AREN’T superglued together.

      The list goes on. It has been a month and we’ve heard every theory we could possibly hope to hear.

    • Erinn says:

      Don’t publicists tend to get a heads up on these kinds of stories? But then again – there’s so much to read about them out there, that he could mean any or all of it haha.

      • K.C. says:

        Publicists don’t necessarily get a heads up, actually. They keep tabs on what’s being said because it’s their job, but a lot of what’s written is printed without anyone’s approval.

      • Lindsay says:

        They almost always get called for comment for legal and journalistic reasons so they have an idea what is about to be printed.

    • Secret squirrel says:

      It is probably in reference to Calvin and Katy’s attack on Tay Tay because it is his job to protect her reputation and defend her honour now…

  12. Maria says:

    they are obviously the most overboard couple of all time but i still doubt this. itsn ot even a month is it? yes im sure the next poster will tell me their parents married after saying hello and have been happy since but its very uncommon and Taylors team and parents would have a word with her.

  13. Jade says:

    Go on Tom, I dare you.

  14. Gg says:

    Tay is SO good for gossip. I’m going through some hard stuff personally, but TayTom and the whole CH mess keeps me smiling!

    • Crox says:

      This relationship should really be called TomTaylor. They could get a fortune from Tom Tailor.

    • Christin says:

      It is a fun distraction, isn’t it? I’m expecting there will be a push for an engagement as soon as the pre-nup can be drawn up.

      Wonder if Tom realized signing up for a first public date on the rocks of RI four weeks ago would lead to all this? Hopefully they are both thrilled.

  15. Crox says:

    Whether this is true or not, or if it happens tomorrow or in 7 years: prenup, you two, prenup!

  16. lilacflowers says:

    The Guardian article is about how failure to report political issues properly results in people voting for referendums or candidates they don’t understand.

    Does Tom know he’s about to propose? And where’s the surprise and romance in the proposal if the bride has already informed the international gossip media that she’s expecting it?

    • shelly says:

      “Does Tom know he’s about to propose?”

      Well I’m guessing he does now lilac !

    • K.C. says:

      Kinda love that he retweeted something political. I know he usually doesn’t engage in the political talk, but I’d be really curious to know his thoughts.

      • Sixer says:

        From where I’m sitting, he retweeted a self-serving Grauniad whinge for similarly self-serving reasons. (See yesterday’s thread). Hardly noble. Also, hardly difficult to see the motive: LOOK AT ME PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE… BUT ONLY IF YOU DO IT NICELY.

        Plus, added an emoticon to confirm he is forever lost to civilised society.

      • Bonzo says:

        I agree with Sixer — that was more than a political statement. He whining for some positive attention to drown out the mickey-taking.

        I bet Taylor showed him how to type that emoticon.

    • MI6 says:

      The bride is orchestrating it and has already purchased the ring.
      What a trainwreck.

    • EnnuiAreTheChampions says:

      I’ll bet he doesn’t know he’s about to propose, but Us Weekly knows best. He probably also didn’t know he had brothers until an earlier Us Weekly story reported that according to their “insider”, Taylor was expected to meet these elusive male siblings shortly after meeting Tom’s mother.

      It occurs to me that my knowing that Tom doesn’t actually have brothers makes me more of an insider than Us Weekly’s insider who doesn’t know that. So I’ll be back later — I’m off to draft an exclusive tip regarding T and T’s plans to drop out of show business entirely and run away to raise alpacas together.

      • shelly says:

        Lol my sources tell me they already got married, by the Pope, when they were at the Vatican.
        They are going to announce it just before awards season.

      • EnnuiAreTheChampions says:

        Ha! And oh, er, yes, MY sources knew all about the Vatican wedding, of course. And about how the Pope let them shoe polish “TS + TH 4EVAH!” on the windows of the Popemobile and drive off into the Italian sunset.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @Ennuaire, he is an “honorary Hemsworth brother”. She’ll get to meet Chris.

  17. Nancy says:

    Maybe the 15th time is the charm for our lovely aging prom queen (I truly didn’t realize she was 26). It seems proper that Taylor should marry the handsome? actor that swept her off her feet. Hope it’s true and they take a nice long honeymoon, a hiatus, so to speak from the media and us!

    • LadyLoo says:

      You know what they say, “15th time’s the charm.”

      Is that the expression?

    • Lela says:

      I really hate all this talk about how many exs T.S has had … Mock her for all her other petty ways, there’s so much to mock her for, but not for how many men she’s had, or rumoured to have had … Ffs I thought we were past where that mattered for a women… Yh I get it she thinks she loves them all, it all follows the true love path blah blah blah, but there isn’t any need to try and shame her for the number…

      • Dara says:

        Lela, I don’t think the shade she gets is about the number at all, it’s that all of her relationships seem to follow the same pattern – and usually within just a few months. It’s aways the love affair of the century and is destined for holy matrimony…until it’s suddenly not.

      • Lela says:

        Like I said it does follow the same path , and to mock her for that, is all fair, however if you notice the two comments above me both mock the number, and that’s what I have an issue with.

      • LadyLoo says:

        It’s the broken record nature of it. I replied to the number because that was in the original quote (it’s true, but beside the point). I don’t care how many bfs she’s had – she could happily make her way through the phone book, that’s her right. What I take exception to is the public stunts she pulls with every relationship, her ‘LOOK, I’m in a relationship!’ approach to them.

      • Lela says:

        I have no issue with the mocking of how she tells her relationship story over, and over, but your comment didn’t portray that ! There was a way of wording it without throwing the “15” in it.

        And, you say it’s “true” like you have been at her bedside, and witnessed it with your own two eyes, again making a point of that number when in reality none of us knows how many men she has slept with, and nor do we have a right too.

      • Tris says:

        It’s not about how many men she’s had sex with. The hilarity is in how many she has fallen truly, madly, deeply and instantly in love with. We aren’t slut-shaming her. We are soulmate-shaming her.

  18. Wilma says:

    I hope so, I really love the over-the-topness of this couple. I don’t know anything about them professionally, don’t listen to random music (no radio here) and only saw him years ago in a BBC series (think it was the newest version of Pride and prejudice? I don’t know, it didn’t stick with me), but from every article I read there radiates a cluelessnes about the world and a heart on sleeve thing that I love watching in other people.

  19. browniecakes says:

    I love the cover of US Weekly. Think of all the pictures we’ve seen of TnT kissing and holding hands and they come up with TWO separate photos of TnT for an ENGAGEMENT story! Great editing guys.

    • Bonzo says:

      I think we should have a caption contest for that cover photo of his. It says “hapless fool” to me, but perhaps that’s just my cynical lens through which I view him. 🙂

  20. browniecakes says:

    I am now thinking of the steep water slide as a metaphor.

  21. browniecakes says:

    I wonder how many articles about himself he had to get past to get to something he wanted to read that held relevance to him. Or like a sequestered juror, is he only given parts of the newspaper to read with holes throughout of things he’s not allowed to see?

  22. Suzanne says:

    The only good thing about these two is that I don’t have to see Blake and Gwen anymore.

  23. One2 says:

    I wonder what his co-stars think about everything? I have a feeling that anytime they are seen out, the paps will ask about Taytom. I can totally see them naming their kid Taytom. (pronounced Tatum)

  24. CornyBlue says:

    I am all for making fun of this couple but this is really stupid and hence in no way could it be true. Tom is a thirsty attention whore but in no way is he an idiot and Taylor will never let this happen specially so close to a breakup so that she can come across as a cheater. Gossip rags should make up better stories really.

  25. daisie-b says:

    I don’t understand how people can possibly think that the Sun photo spread was their first date. The relationship obviously had been developing up to that point. There were many opportunities for them to have crossed paths in recent years. He was in Nashville for several weeks researching Hank Williams. They were both working in Australia last December. Anna Wintour may have thought they would be compatible and put them in touch.

    The announcement was made once they were sure it was the real deal. They have been inseparable since then and the time they spend in Australia now is a test to see how they weather the situation when he has work demands on his time.

    She is very intelligent but not academically educated. He will expose her to Shakespeare and the classics. He already plays the guitar and sings country western. They could just close themselves off from the world and lead a blissful life.

    As far as his clothes… I have a 34 year old son who dresses the same way and it makes me crazy! It’s a generational thing.

    • K.C. says:

      Thank you. There’s obviously no way R.I. Rock Day was their first date. That just…makes zero sense. Clearly they’d been together for a bit before that, even just through texting or emailing if not physically together.

    • Bonzo says:

      I’d put money on it that he was with her when he flew into LA at the end of May, a day or two before her breakup was announced.

      He certainly was with her after Wizard Con when he was spotted in her neighborhood a few days after.

      • Phoebe says:

        Actually Bonzo, he was seen leaving Wizard Con the same evening it ended and was papped multiple times in London over the next week or so, including the breakfast with JArthy. He was seen in NYC a few days before the Rock pics were taken.

      • bonzo says:

        Phoebe, I think you’re mistaken. He saw JArthy a few days before he left for LA at the end of May (where some have speculated he met up with Taylor). He disappeared for several days before showing up at Wizard Con, the same weekend that she attended a fan’s wedding in NJ. He was photographed picking up a pizza in the West Village (reportedly a couple of blocks from her penthouse) a few days after Wizard Con and the next time we see him (one week later), he’s snogging Taylor in RI.

        I haven’t seen any pictures of him in London between end of May and late June when he took Taylor to meet his family.

      • lilacflowers says:

        @bonzo, there were tweets about him being on a flight back to London with people after Wizard World

      • Bonzo says:

        Lilac, there was also that tweet about him being at a theatre show or something like that was never confirmed. What we do know is that a few days after Wizard World he was spotted in NY and there is pictures to confirm it, unlike the tweet you mention. While it’s possible he flew back and forth over those few days, I doubt it. I remember that sighting specifically because people online were wondering why he was in NY and wasn’t taking a beach holiday before Thor started filming.

        I remember people were watching for sightings of him once his promo tour ended and I’m just detailing what came up during that time. It makes a lot more sense that he stayed in NY with Taylor getting all loved up and preparing for the RI “outing” than going back to NY and the photo supports that assumption.

    • Luca76 says:

      I think they met the night before the Met Gala. There’s video of him, Idris Elba and Swift leaving Anna Wintour’s house and saying ‘nice meeting you’ to eachother. RI obviously wasn’t their first date but it does seem to be a whirlwind.

      • Anonanon says:

        I think that was to deflect attention away from the fact that they already knew each other.

      • Luca76 says:

        Eh I mean anything is possible but I think it’s more likely that’s when they met. At that point there was no attention being thrown their way.

      • Bonzo says:

        Didn’t someone say that he started following her Twitter in March? Makes me wonder if he met her then or if PR “meetings” started taking place. The high profile transition from Calvin to Tom take time to plan and execute.

    • Dara says:

      OK – at the risk of injecting facts into a celeb gossip discussion. Tom was not in Australia in December, the Skull Island production didn’t get to Oz until January. His research for Hank brought him to Nashville in Sept/Oct of 2014. I need one of the Swifties to verify her whereabouts at that time, but I don’t think she was even in town.

      Mark me down in the ‘Anna Wintour as matchmaker’ column. They met at her party the night before the Gala and hit it off.

      • Miss Melissa says:

        And had at the very least a texting/phone relationship from that moment on.

        And consummated it when he arrived in LA, at the very latest.

      • Gingerly says:

        @ Dara, I haven’t heard a single song of hers, but I quickly checked where she was in fall, 2014. She was everywhere – London, Paris, Tokyo, Sydney, NYC, and LA – except Nashville. I don’t think this is far from important, but I always admire your fact checking ability.

      • Dara says:

        thx @Gingerly. I’m a huge fan of gossipy speculation, but I’m also a huge fan of verifiable facts. It’s fun for me to indulge in the former, but only if it’s not directly contradicted by the latter.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @Dara, you know I love you and we both love facts (Gingerly does too) but elsewhere on this thread, facts are deemed worthy of eye-rolling and smackdowns and rudeness. So, come have some brownies with me. Also, if Tom was hooking up with all the women some here would have him with during that five weeks in Nashville, well, it is a wonder he got any work done and his prowess is to wonder at.

  26. KatMC says:

    Hmmmm, his tweet is very interesting. I wonder if he is tiring of all of this yet. There is a very bizarre story in DM today that she co-wrote/wrote a song for Calvin Harris and that he apparently was asked by Ryan Seacrest if he would ever work with Taylor musically, and he said no. I am sure her “people,” or “squad,” will start leaking negative stuff about him now. Calvin should be relieved that he escaped alive.

  27. Lucretia says:

    I’m slightly jarred every time I see a photo of them together or side by side as the Us Weekly cover shows. I feel like we’re playing “one of these things is not like the other” on Sesame Street — It’s like looking at a muppet with a cabbage patch doll. Miscast.

  28. Div says:

    Jez had an interesting article where all the publicists said this benefits Tom’s career if he wants to do big studio films. While I agree that this is off putting for Bond and perhaps super artsy indie films, I think the fan girls are way overreacting to career damage. Ben A’s career didn’t have a low point because of JLo and Bennifer, it was because he had a series of films that bombed critically and commercially.

    Anyway, the Tiddles engagement is bound to be gloriously over the top and make the media and fans act crazy.

    • Katy says:

      @Div, I disagree with you about the downfall of Ben Affleck’ career. Ben’s movies were commercial failures largely due to over exposure as a result of Bennifer 1.0, he said so himself, yes they were horrible movies but when the audience can’t suspend belief when they watch an actors’ movie and you see the actor instead of the character largely because you know too much about the actors personal life than you lose the mystery. Tom will suffer the Sam’s fate as Ben did, the media coverage and not to mention the social media coverage is going to make matters even worse for Tom when all is said and done. If it’s true and he does plan to propose, wait for him to get cold feet and run away citing excessive media coverage, the media coverage of the break up will be just as massive.

      • Miss Jupitero says:

        I think one reason Loki carried so much energy was due to the fact that TommyAnnE was this completely unknown newbie in Hollywood.

        And I think it really was the character of Loki (which is about as far from his actual personality as you can get) that was central to attracting his earliest fans. A certain level of mystery helped that. Now that we have all of this, I fully expect Loki in this next film to be pure cheesy camp, completely overshadowed by Tiddles.

      • Luca76 says:

        Katy the big difference is Tom has said nothing publicly about this relationship.We may all know that the pap walks are prearranged photo ops but as long as he doesn’t actually comment publicly he’s fine. Ben and Jen 1.0 did every talk show imaginable and a music video to commemorate their love. And both were awful actors. Now TH is no Olivier but he’s solid.

      • Bonzo says:

        If you still take Tom at his word, he did say that he’d talk about his love life when “there’s something to write home about”.

    • CornyBlue says:

      But he has not been in a good film is a long time too. Like I cannot remember seeing him onscreen after Thor 2.

    • Luca76 says:

      Yup. This only helps TH career wise. Especially if he is nominated for an Emmy. Ben’s problem always is/was that he’s a bad actor. And as for Tom Cruise the couch jumping was just one in a string of bizarre behaviors. Anyway in comparison as neither has publicly spoken about the relationship.

    • delorb says:

      I agree. At the very least, this gets his name on casting lists he might not have been on otherwise. And frankly, he can’t live off Loki for the rest of his life, not matter how much his fans want him to.

    • daisie-b says:

      @Luca76 Tom may have not answered questions in an ambush attempt at an interview, but his actions speak volumes. They met the parents! He wore the “I (love) TS” shirt, which was a total surprise to her! He let loose over 4th of July weekend and participated in all of the goofiness without seeming like it was beneath him. He knew it was being photographed. He brought her to Australia to be with him! They have been inseparable for a month. Any where along the line he could have begged off using the excuse of work… but he didn’t.

    • Ursaline says:

      “Ben A’s career didn’t have a low point because of JLo and Bennifer, it was because he had a series of films that bombed critically and commercially.”

      Gigli, anyone? SO many Razzies…

      And the I <3 TS shirt was so awesomely hokey. How could she not love it?

  29. Jane says:

    I know that Tom is a frequent guest on the Graham Norton show. Tom turns into a tried-hard cringe-worthy show-off as well. I am DYING to see what Graham asks Tom in regards to Tay-Tay the next time he is on. Will he be reserved and refuse to answer questions or go the couch jumping route? Decisions decisions.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      He has only been on Norton’s show twice.

      • Jane says:

        Ok-I stand corrected. Let’s try this again. Tom has been a guest on the Graham Norton show. Better?

      • LadyLoo says:

        I’m rolling my eyes so you don’t have to, Jane. Some people.

        How about, Tom’s such a desperate attention and fame trollop that even though he’s ‘ONLY been on Norton’s show twice,’ it seems like he’s been there many, many more times.

      • Jane says:

        @LadyLoo- Consider yourself adopted LOL 🙂 I totally LOVE your comment.

      • delorb says:

        @LadyLoo,

        Smack-down on aisle 7! LOL Best comment on this thread so far.

    • Luca76 says:

      ooops wrong thread

    • Christin says:

      I watched a clip of TH on Norton’s show, and I understand the comments mentioning OTT/try-hard. He was doing imitations (a couple were actually good). He seemed to be like a show pony or clapping seal. I didn’t finish watching, because it become tedious to watch.

      • Jane says:

        Was it the one where Robert De Niro was there watching as Tom was doing and impersonation of him? I couldn’t finish watching that bit. It was just too much for me.

      • Christin says:

        Yes, that’s the one! He was hamming it up a bit too much for my taste. He lost me after the first couple of impressions.

  30. seesittellsit says:

    How romantic to have the press announce it before it happens. Why, it’s like Charles and Diana! Uh oh – oh wait!

    I wouldn’t be a bit surprised. If this relationship serves the purpose I suspect (cough), they might as well get it over have a kid, then get divorced . . . this must have been in the cards from the get-go, that’s why the parents were pulled in.

    I daren’t think about the wedding circus Swift will insist upon – what’s your guess, folks, the RI estate or Stowell Park, Hiddles’ Mum’s family’s ancestral place? How about both?!

  31. Meee4 says:

    Remember the “I’m not going to rush out to put a ring on it” quote. Hmmmpt!

    • Bonzo says:

      Remember the “…the circus of being…a celebrity is something I’m sort of not interested in. I find it strange.” quote? Pfft.

      • EnnuiAreTheChampions says:

        Sure. And it’s possible that after saying that, he met an incredibly famous woman he really liked, and in order to be with her, he had to step into that circus. Sometimes in relationships we compromise, give things up, or change our minds. It happens.

      • Miss Melissa says:

        You don’t compromise on principles, darling.

        Otherwise, they aren’t actually principles, they are just talk.

      • EnnuiAreTheChampions says:

        @missmelissa, when did he say anything about “principles” with respect to fame? I don’t really think “I’m not really interested the the circus of fame” is equivalent to “As God is my witness I will NEVER COURT PUBLICITY!” Also, although I don’t remember us meeting, I’m so flattered that you consider me “darling”!

      • Bonzo says:

        Ennui, if you think he fell head over heels for Taylor because of her looks & personality and that her immense fame and fortune isn’t the primary drivers here, then you give him credit for being a better man than 99% out there.

        I don’t agree. Tom’s always wanted to be a superstar and Taylor is his last ditch effort to climb the rest of the way up the ladder to A-list. He’s never been a part of that crowd (in the US at least) and never been invited to the big events/parties until the Met Gala. He jumped at the opportunity to hook up with an A-lister that could get him into those places from now on and raise his profile exponentially.

      • Becky says:

        Saying “I’m not really interested in the circus of fame”, then getting involved with Taylor Swift is a contradiction isn’t it? A bit disingenuous, false modesty perhaps? No one is suggesting he’s committing perjury for gods sake.

      • EnnuiAreTheChampions says:

        @becky, no, I don’t think his original statement was necessarily disingenuous just because he may have later changed his mind or compromised for a relationship. Or even **if** he changed his mind about needing to cultivate fame more actively as a means to opening the door to more role choices. I just don’t consider changing one’s mind to be the unpardonable sin that some here seem to consider it to be.

  32. Nashville Girl says:

    I’ve thought for the last couple of weeks that we will be looking at a Christmas wedding.

    • Bonzo says:

      I was theorizing that Taylor would want a Valentines Day wedding and Tom would want nuptials just before he promotes Kong in March. A lot hangs on the box office success of that film and that would be a sh!t ton of free publicity.

      • K.C. says:

        Agreed. I absolutely see them at least engaged but possibly also married before March.

      • Maire3 says:

        @Bonzo. True to Taylor’s form, but since Valentine’s Day became officially attached to the Cumberbatch wedding, Tom might invoke his one “No” allowed in their negotiations.

      • Bonzo says:

        Maire3, I doubt Tom would have any veto power to stop her if she wants a Valentine’s Day wedding. Girl’s gonna have the wedding of her dreams. He just needs to show up in whatever costume he’s wearing.

  33. K says:

    Haha I wonder if Ben Affleck is sitting there thinking I should make a call- I mean that man nearly survived Bennifer 1.0 and let’s be real to climb out of the career slump he had to marry the ultimate social climber of Hollywood and create family world.

    Tom’s career is going to be garbage after this, I mean it’s entertaining but it’s so bad for his career. Oh well I love it.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      Affleck’s career slump was due to bad performances in bad films like Reindeer Games, Jersey Girl, Gigli, Daredevil, Surviving Christmas, The Third Wheel, and Paycheck.

    • LadyLoo says:

      Ben took a long time to recover, AND he had some box office and award pull in Hollywood. Tom’s got no awards pull and his past three movies have tanked at the box office.

      Taylor or no Taylor – his professional road to A-list just got a whole lot bumpier and longer.

      • k says:

        Exactly by the time Bennifer happened Ben had an Oscar and some respect for his acting then bam Bennifer and it all went down the drain. Tom doesn’t have that this is just like a look at me, look at me situation!! It will back fire. He can come back but its always going to be there, just like Bennifer is for Affleck.

  34. Bonzo says:

    If Tom gets an Emmy nod tomorrow, I won’t be surprised AT ALL if he pulls a “Weinstein” and gets engaged during final voting in the latter half of August. It wouldn’t be that strange after what we’ve seen the past month from him.

    • Miss Jupitero says:

      I will place my bet on that…..

    • LadyLoo says:

      He’s shown his true fame-trollop ways, so anything is possible. I do wonder, however, if Emmy voters will see through that, as so many in the serious press have seen through these PR stunts.

    • Maire3 says:

      No doubt their PR team is probably orchestrating the “2nd wave” to keep their visibility alive through the Golden Globe season. I’m betting on 6more months of this. Oy

      • Dara says:

        Oy indeed – I think you might be right about the Golden Globes. Tom may not be quite ready to let go of his awards hope for Hank. I doubt Sony will fork over any funds to mount a proper awards campaign for him, so he might be taking matters into his own hands. The HFPA are usually very happy to hand a nomination to someone who will give their awards show some big-time star power. Having the Forbes highest earning celebrity as your +1 might just do the trick.

  35. Tiffany27 says:

    Hahahahahahhhahahahhahahahahahaha!!!!!

    This breakup will be so spectacular.

  36. Suzanne says:

    ‘YAAASSSSS’

    Down wid da kids

  37. MI6 says:

    His tweet is ironic, given that his gf plays her entire life out on social media.
    He’s in love, all right – with the fame, the lifestyle and the guitar/music industry.
    This is going to be some lesson in maturity for him…I wish I could send him an airbag

    • Chef Grace says:

      or barf bag. he may need one after the dust settles.

      • MI6 says:

        Here’s an alternative theory (because despite all evidence to the contrary, I continue to live in hope):
        Perhaps he knew this was going to break today and this is a smoke signal? “Don’t believe everything you read…” ?

    • KatMC says:

      Yes, definitely ironic and a bit naive on his part.

  38. KatMC says:

    The thought of what their wedding would be like makes me shudder. And of course, all of it would be perfectly staged for Instagram.

  39. The Understudy says:

    The whirlwind togetherness of the photo story from TayTo has made this story inevitable. Tom does not want to be judged or have his relationships speculated about in print gossip or in think pieces by reputable media, I’m sure that’s the message we are meant to take from the tweet. I think it’s possible he has been professionally bombarded by requests for interviews and comment and I will wonder how much both of them have been pulled down the Internet rabbit hole of looking at that media.

    The problem is that many of these pieces are made up from good guess work about what may very well come to pass.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      Many of these pieces are made up as click bait or spontaneous grocery checkout purchase lure for the purpose of ad revenues for the website/publication without any input from the celebrity or the celebrity’s PR team. If a story is hot, they’re all going to jump on it with their own “exclusive” embellishments and people fall for it all the time

      • K.C. says:

        Exactly. Very little of what we see in tabloids reflects reality. There might be specks here and there, but it’s mostly fiction based on what readers’ interests are at the time. If one week everyone is making fun of Tiddles, every article will be about how they must be a PR stunt. When people start believing it might be legitimate, every article starts to revolve around their wedding plans, lol. We have already seen that shift over the span of a week or two. There really aren’t THAT many stories that come from PR teams—usually just journalists’ imaginations.

      • Miss Melissa says:

        The problem with that theory is the input from the celebrity and the celebrity’s team isn’t the truth either. Assuming otherwise is a grave mistake.

        The lesson from this escapade is that all of these people are in the business of spinning fantasy, and they are never not working. Even when they are not on set.

        Unless one actually knows or has a relationship with them, no one will ever know what a celebrity is really like. We are being sold packaging, 24-7.

        He is not genuine and never was. Proof of his great acting ability, right there.

        I don’t know why anyone would choose that lifestyle, truly. What an exhausting way to live.

      • lilacflowers says:

        @missmelissa, I didn’t say that the input from the celebrity or the celebrity’s team was truth either. There was nothing wrong with my theory. My point was that media will publish articles made up by their own staff using “sources” who are nothing more than the person sitting at the website’s computer who got the assignment to spin whatever is floating around out there in a unique way so they can call it “exclusive” and get consumers to buy their publication or click on their website. Sometimes it benefits the celebrity, sometimes not but that isn’t the purpose. The purpose is to sell ad space for the website/publication. And it amazes me how many people do not get this and insist that everything out there is generated by celebrity publicists.

  40. Ayesha says:

    Am I supposed to believe all this bullshit? Tom in his most awkward and embarrassing interview ever,  he couldn’t say he is in love with Taylor,  or at least he is enjoying his time with her in Australia. Now you want me to believe that he is going to propose to her. This is the biggest joke ever.

    If this news appears to be true, which I suspect it is, then Tom is the most stupid person on this earth.

    • Uh-huh says:

      PR-driven fakery – all of it. It still boggles my mind what an enormous disconnect there is between Hiddleston’s regular behaviour (in interviews, on Twitter, or in impromptu dealings with people IRL) and all this utterly ridiculous, juvenile nonsense that he has agreed to create by posing for photos and videos with Swift.

      The ‘sources’ always sound like scripted twaddle coming from her camp to me. Or maybe his as well, with her agreement. They’re still trying to ‘sell it’. But is he on-board? He obviously was to start with, sort of, but I wonder how much more of this he wants to get involved with simply for the sake of raising his profile. It is all about the work after all 😀 … I see nothing here but a VERY poorly judged strategy to advance his career. So much for that!!

      • K.C. says:

        We’ve only seen pictures of them together, and he has declined to comment on the relationship when asked, so I’m not sure how this differs from what fans have come to recognize as his “regular behavior.” He’s dating a woman who is famous, and is therefore getting a ton of attention. He has always been this dorky and seemed interested in the spotlight.

      • Uh-huh says:

        All of it looks staged and fake to me. That’s the problem.
        It’s sort of farcical from where I’m standing.

  41. Sue says:

    I still don´t know what is this (and I really don´t want to care, either, not successful so far…) My mind isn´t that ‘House of cards’ type, no strategic thinking, combinations, conspiracys etc., though. But I´ve got too much questions in my head now.
    There was definitely something going on before June 14, that is for sure, but what and why and how? Why him and her? Is this a real love spark or just pure business for a temporary time? Wasn´t there any other man / actor/singer etc. available for this? Why would she pair with him to help his career ( she isn´t the one who need a boost)? And as a revenge for being dumped by CH this happened to quick for any proper planning.
    If they were somehow connected in the background (texting etc.) and able to keep it low-key, why did they go public and opened this Pandora box in such a smashing style?
    And who will do this with his private life , famous or not, willingly? Is fame and money really worth this?
    Obviously I´m just a civilian and not used to this type of high games,, though…

  42. HeyThere! says:

    I don’t know why, but I honestly think this could go the distance?! Long engagement? May wedding in 2017? I bet she would wait on babies though, idk why but I just think that. Please let this happen!!!!

  43. Frexit says:

    This isn’t real. I used to like Tom kind of but this has been embarrassing.

    Oh well, having to spend time around her is punishment enough.

    • LadyLoo says:

      Real, not real. Hard to say. Embarrassing – yes, always.

      • Miss Melissa says:

        Ah, but you see, he was selling us a product back then too. The product then was the “ordinary man with the extraordinary job. An earnest, shakespearian actor who is not into the trappings of celebrity and is all about the craft.”

        It was a well-sold product, but it was a story being sold, without question.

        This is the new product, that’s all. It isn’t necessarily more real or honest than the original.

        I personally liked the old product much better than the new one. YMMV.

        The mistake comes when you believe either product is the real man.

      • shelly says:

        Lets be fair there can be no such thing as an actor who isn’t fame hungry. Only people with an ego, and lack of embarrassment would go into such a profession.

        I would say Miss Melissa is spot on about us being sold a product when an actor, any actor gives an interview.

        When you look behind the curtain things are probably very different.

      • Uh-huh says:

        @ Miss Melissa
        Good point.
        I thought the old product was more consistent and believable in its presentation however.
        The ‘rebrand’ isn’t working IMO. They can keep on telling me he’s a ‘hunk’ and a ‘Hollywood A lister’ and a future 007, or a himbo type who is super-interested in posing in his knickers at every opportunity but it’s not gelling for me. Having him as contrived arm-candy for an American pop-star who appeals to tweenies is just WEIRD.

      • delorb says:

        @Miss Melissa,

        So true. Its all packaging. I thought his old packaging was worse than this one. This one seems to be the more authentic of the two. Just look at how easily he put the whoring costume on. So if I had to pick, I’d pick this one. His earnest phase was so shallow, so cloying, so fake, that I couldn’t get through any of his interviews. But this out and proud, fame-whore is someone I can get behind.

  44. K.C. says:

    I truly think this could be a long-term relationship. But the image of gossipers looking back five years on and being like “Remember when we thought Hiddleswift was a joke and they just…never stopped?” is quite funny to me.

    • shelly says:

      The reason I think it could be genuine, is not because he met her folks, but because she met HIS family.

      No matter how try hard or fame thirsty he is perceived to be, I just cannot see him involving his family in a tawdry showmance. Even talk of a piece of performance art, wouldn’t mean involving civilians in it, especially not his Mother and young niece.

      Famous people are not the same as the rest of us, speedy relationships, weddings, babies and break ups are not seen as particularly odd amongst the famous. It’s happening imo, and it will be glorious.

      • K.C. says:

        Totally agree, Shelly. I was already believing it to be real, and his awkward interviews where he nervous-laughed when declining to speak about her sold me all the way. It’s real. They might have Disney-like photoshoots with paps, but they’re clearly happy together.

      • Uh-huh says:

        I think he would do that actually. He *is* that driven. And I think his family must have been in on it – I mean they must care about him and want to help him. Still think it’s kind of pathetic and desperate though.

        Using the family as a way of getting people to think “gee, it must be serious” is a canny tactic in a way, because that’s what a lot of people automatically think. I believe this tactic has already been tried before by his PR folks too. There was a story about him allegedly taking Jessica Chastain home to meet his family that appeared a couple of years back in the Daily Mail. It turned out to be bogus, but it was a nifty way of implying they were a serious item (usefully enough when she just happened to be in the media for her Oscar nom). 😀

      • EnnuiAreTheChampions says:

        I think it’s real too @shelly, both for the reason you mentioned and because they haven’t pulled back in the face of fairly negative media coverage. If this were just a PR strategy that went horribly awry, his going off to Australia to work would have been the perfect excuse for them to be “forced” to spend months on different continents, and then, sadly, “drift apart” and amicably part ways. Instead, she went with him. To me, that says quite a bit.

      • shelly says:

        That is also a good point Ennui, plus I really don’t see what in it for her. He is internet famous and touted to be the next James Bond, along with half the actors in Britdom, but other than that he’s nothing to write home about.
        I’d say he’s a B lister at the very most, so maybe, just maybe they are two lanky dorks who just happen to like each other…a lot.

      • browniecakes says:

        What’s in it for her is she gets to get married like her friends to a likeable good guy who fits her brand. What’s in it for him is he gets to live the VIP life and be wildly famous whether or not he ever earns another paycheck of his own.

      • Guesto says:

        @browniecakes – In a nutshell.

        But I do think he’s way more cynical and calculating than she is.

      • The Understudy says:

        “I have tried with all of my power for there not to be any inauthenticity. There is no version of me presented to you that’s been created or is artificial. The people I’ve always respected have an integrity that is unassailable. I’m only in control of my own integrity. I’m accountable for everything I’ve done and I understand that. Everything else is out of my control”.

        I don’t believe the man who said this is faking anything. Tom is a high achiever and I really believe he has always wanted a life less ordinary, call it thirst if you like. Taylor Swift, one of the most successful women in the world has responded to his advances, fallen madly in love with him, what an ego boost, how is he ever going to do better in the partner stakes. He has tasted her life and clearly wants in on it no matter the consequences. This is an epic romance to both of them.

        If it’s true that Tom saw himself in Jonathan Pine, the perpetual escapee from emotional entanglement was it just that his previous entanglements didn’t seem worth it, he must have been in love before. He seems to have bitten off a huge chunk of entanglement here. The circus is getting bigger with Taylor & her ex firing shots at each other. I think she is not immune to this battering or the fact that he is having to adjust to living his life in public. In the face of all this onslaught is that why she is not letting go or are they both clinging on tightly to each other?

    • Guesto says:

      @K.C. – Hiddleswift will always be a joke to me, even if/when they’re celebrating their 50th Wedding anniversary. 😉

      Roll on the engagement, I say.

    • Looty says:

      Didn’t KC predict a speedy wedding weeks ago? I can’t wait to see what celebrities their kids grow up and fall in love with.

      • K.C. says:

        Haha, I did! I’ve had my money on these two going this distance for a while, and I’ll be a bit surprised if they split up. I say “a while” relatively speaking, of course. This has somehow only been a month-long phenomenon. If I didn’t have a calendar, I’d think this has been going on much longer!

    • daisie-b says:

      @The Understudy
      Your comment is the best piece of writing I have ever read on this site. It is such a voice of reason. I’m writing this on 7/16 and there’s a chance that you’ll never see this. I have been known to have extra sensory abilities and I hope that you are inspired to check here. I have great hopes for Tom and Taylor as a couple. I think that they’re temperamentally perfect for each other.

  45. Smd says:

    If Tay Tay decides to outdo the Jlo video it better have dragonflies, an action shot of them sliding down the TayAmerica slide and an epic booty smack. Hmm, perhaps footage from Rome and Australia? We.will have to watch that music video together y’all! Mimosas and cookies for all!

  46. FW says:

    Good Job, Tom! After learning that TayTay earned $170mn last year, you are about to make some decisive actions

    my question from another thread, Is Tiddles the highest earning couple now? Together they earned about $171mn?

  47. RUNSWITHSCISSORS says:

    I hope it’s not true – what’s the old saying? Marry in haste, repent at leisure?

    If it does happen, I would love to see the prenup. I’m wondering if there will be a clause about her agreeing to purchase and fund a production company for TommyAnne. It will give him something to do, and it won’t matter if his projects don’t get off the ground or bomb at the box office.
    PapTayTo Productions!

    • JHK says:

      I would hate it, but I think the fame trollop (thank you Ladyloo) has played this very shrewdly. And I’m afraid it will all be carefully timed for possible awards, a la cumberbatch.

      And if she agrees to buy him his very own company and fund it even in the event of a breakup… Blech.

  48. jhwoodw says:

    Sorry if anyone mentioned this before. I didnt have time to read all the comments an replies, BUT…. I’m not surprised they used two pics split for the cover. I havent seen him smile that big in a single photo of them together.

    • LadyLoo says:

      Yeah, they could hardly use those LAX photos. Or the Oz night out photos where his eyes seem conflicted: love for the flashes, hate for the way in which they were brought about.

      • jhwoodw says:

        Yah, those LAX and OZ landing photos were horrible! He always looks annoyed and tired now. He used to look so happy and engaging.

    • Bonzo says:

      I think they were shading them both by cutting a pasting two single photos together… like saying they’re not a real couple while writing about an impending engagement.

  49. Willie says:

    Has anyone started a pool yet for how long this “relationship” will last if Hiddles doesn’t get a nomination for the Night Manager?

    • browniecakes says:

      It will last until after Abigail’s wedding. She doesn’t want to be the squad single.

    • Ninette says:

      Is an emmy really worth going through a huge, month long showmance?

      • LadyLoo says:

        For the fame trollop? Yes.

      • Miss Melissa says:

        Believe me, Emmys are a big deal for everyone in the entertainment business, whether on screen or behind the scenes, news, sports or entertainment. An Emmy is an Emmy and legitimizes one amongst their peers.

  50. pikawho? says:

    I hope the next big popstar comes out of nowhere and knocks Taylor down at the same time Hollywood collectively loses Tom’s number.

    Then they’ll be stuck with each other in post-fame obscurityville and I can get a damn box of tampons at CVS without seeing their faces. I have never been so tired, so quickly of a celeb “romance”.

    • LadyLoo says:

      But aren’t you using Hiddleswift tampons? The tampons so thirsty you’ll never have a leak…unless that leak is to a gossip mag.

      • shelly says:

        LOL LadyLoo. I’m now picturing a typical tampon ad, but with a girl going down a Taymerica waterslide.

        “You can do anything with a Hiddleswift tampon.”

      • EnnuiAreTheChampions says:

        Ok, I’m going to begrudgingly concede that this comment is hilarious. 🙂

      • Itiswhatitis says:

        Ladyloo, take the rest of the day off today. You have earned your money with that comment.

      • Guesto says:

        Seriously LMAO @ Ladyloo. 😀

        The really funny bit is that I can so imagine Tom being the ‘caring face’ of a tampons ad. And since Tom is so sincere and really ‘understands women’, I can even imagine him insisting on the coy blue being blazing, pillar-box red…

        Someone somewhere, please make this advert happen.

      • Smd says:

        Omg! Ladyloo for the win! 2 snaps and T formation in your honor!!

      • Bonzo says:

        You know it’s a good day when Hiddles and tampons are the primary subjects of the thread. Thank you Ladyloo, for the giggles.

      • Maire3 says:

        @LadyLoo: SNL should *totally*steal this idea for a commercial parody. I’m having flashbacks to their Kotex “Classic Maxi” and “Annuale Birth Control” commercials

  51. Skins says:

    Yes, yes, I’ll marry you and your british accent

    • Solanaceae (Nighty) says:

      @Sixer, she would say: Yes, yes, I’ll marry you and your ENGLISH accent…

      😛

  52. MI6 says:

    And in the next episode of Rebound Lightning Round: CH is having an absolutely epic Twitter meltdown.
    TH is being used in this little revenge scenario.

    • fanny says:

      Yes I have just read itand IT’S GLORIOUS ooooooooooouhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!
      I have to stand up and give a spcial kind of applause for the Katy Perry reference.
      I feel like all hell is going to break loose.

    • Miss Melissa says:

      I screen capped it.

      Shame.

    • Guesto says:

      @M16 – Oh come on.

      I know it’s hard for his fans to get to grips with the ‘new’ *smirks* Tom but he is not being used. For him to be used, he would have had to have gone into this relationship blind.

      Hiddles is a lot of things but ‘blind’ he really is not.

      Blindly ambitious, yes!

      • MI6 says:

        Love IS blind, Guesto.
        You’ll see – I called it. Tayvin back together by December.
        Katy Perry just got involved. This is epic.
        #TaylorSwiftisOverParty

      • Guesto says:

        Well then this would surely be the point where your (idea of) Tom would bail. He would be justified in doing so and could, if he then kept his head down, emerge at some point with his dignity intact. Let’s see if he does. 😉

        Honestly, I don’t mean to mock since I couldn’t care less what they do and am only here for the laughs, but I do find it funny that he’s still being seen somewhat as the innocent party here caught up in her PR net.

      • MI6 says:

        @Guesto – THexit 😉
        And yes, I really do believe he has the emotional IQ of a turnip.

  53. cakecakecake says:

    Please god, NO!!

    Now Swift will flounce by the media w/a thin band on that finger and drive the public crazy, LOL

    her PR folks are serious as heck!!

    • Looty says:

      Her PR game is unreal.

    • MoochieMom says:

      No way is there just a thin band on that finger ever gonna happen. It’s gonna be a round solitare so she can stack rings on it for every special moment. Girl is gonna need more fingers.

  54. JHK says:

    I’m afraid it may have already happened, and her PR leaked it. Followed soon by another elaborately staged pap walk so she can wave her left hand around (the other hand still firmly attached to His Nibs) to show off the ring. Fame Trollops 4evah.

    I really hope I’m wrong. If I’m not, I’m going to need a barf bag.

    • RUNSWITHSCISSORS says:

      I hope you’re wrong too, but if you’re right, please pass me a barf bag as well.

      Cumby must be laughing his ass off at this, and wondering if he’ll be asked to be a groomsman.

    • Maire3 says:

      @JHK. The PR machine is like the shark in “Jaws”: murky, powerful and scary. Paraphrasing Capt. Quint, “We’re gonna need a bigger bag”

  55. Cricket says:

    As an ode to Richard Curtis.. Taylor will be wed in all her Alice Tinker decked out glory – after all she is marrying William Thacker and yes, the Vicar of Dibley will perform the ceremony in a perfect English country church with people hidden in the pews for their called upon instrumental solos to “All You Need is Love” then off to an outdoor reception complete with follies and flowers everywhere and her squad ending the night with a chorus of ‘Stand By Your Man’ ..

    ETA: and Oh, just read Sir Rod Stewart’s lovely abode is listed sounds like the perfect country ‘cottage’ to raise the Tiddle Tots

  56. WyoGirl says:

    I don’t mean to sound snobby, but this is CB after all. So 007 is a graduate of Cambridge and RADA. Did 1989 even graduate from high school? Whatever do they talk about?

    • daisie-b says:

      Culturally, she is an empty vessel but an eager learner. He can recite Shakespeare and expose her to all the classics have to offer. She could write and compose a musical for the stage. Instead of going to the Venetian in Vegas they could have a palazzo in Venice.

      • LadyLoo says:

        What? So he can be her husband…and college professor? Is this a relationship or an annex class at the community college?

        I don’t know about anyone else, but I was happy that LordLoo came to me fully formed from university. He had knowledge, ideas, book learning, common sense. It was nice that I didn’t have to ‘train him up.’

    • Maire3 says:

      I have visions of a small argument about squeezing the toothpaste tube all wrong which spirals into a massive blowup ending with her awkward literary references in ‘Love Story’.
      Tom: “Wot drivel — ‘Cuz you were Romeo, I was the scarlet letter?’ Were you pregnant with another man’s child? And didn’t anyone tell you they *both died* at the end?”

  57. Mira says:

    This story is boring now. The drama with Calvin is so much more entertaining 🙂

  58. Abby_J says:

    Random thoughts:

    Somewhere, Chris Evans and Jenny Slate are thanking Tom secretly for taking all the air out of the, ‘Is Chris Evans a homewrecker’ story. I haven’t seen them mentioned in quite a while. Then again I guess neither of them are Taylor Swift famous anyway.

    If she’s pregnant, there is going to be a lot of math going on. When was the child conceived, was she still with Calvin? Could Calvin be the father? I can see the headlines now.

    Not gonna lie. I think the person this might turn out to be the best for is Calvin Harris. I had no idea who he was before Hiddleswift 2016 started. Now I follow him on Twitter and have even downloaded a few songs that he’s been involved in. Not my usual kind of music, but it makes great music to run to.

    • browniecakes says:

      great music to run to – that’s what Tom used to think.

      • Abby_J says:

        Haha! Now he just listens to Taylor.

        I do have Shake It Off on one of my playlists. I haven’t liked a song by her since You Belong with Me, but I like that one. 😉

  59. Jayna says:

    After Calvin’s meltdown on twitter today, I really like him more and am really beginning to dislike Taylor. What was the need during her “in lurve” romance novel pap walks to leak out the info that she wrote the lyrics for Calvin’s song? I mean, really why now if she’s caught up in a mad love affair? I love the way Calvin took her down for her leak in his tweets. Katy P. is loving this.

    • LadyLoo says:

      THIS. If she’s in LOVE and TH is THE ONE and they’re thinking about marriage and babies and a timeshare in Florida…why does she have the time to plot against her ex? Why does she have the inclination?

      If you are truly happy with your new life, you can’t even remember the names of your ex.

    • Christin says:

      I didn’t think his tweets were terrible, given what claims were coming from her side about the song. I don’t find anyone in this triangle to be exceptionally mature, yet I don’t blame him for setting the record straight.

  60. Spittair says:

    The timing of the news leaking that Taylor wrote one of his songs, Calvin’s flipping out over it and her hospital visit is putting my inner cynic into overdrive. It’s almost like her team established this narrative to make Calvin look look like a bully if he clapped back. But why do this? Payback for cheating (if the rumors are true)? My, my.

  61. Dangles says:

    He’ll make a good first husband. I guess.

  62. KatMC says:

    The fact that Calvin brought to light that Regina George (Tay Tay) really did have it out for Katy Perry is comedy gold. I saw that today and I started laughing my arse off. Oh my gosh, Tom Hiddleston better go on his daily run in the morning and keep running as far as he can. She is a total nut.

    • LadyLoo says:

      He needs to take a Forest Gump run.

      • RUNSWITHSCISSORS says:

        Ladyloo, you are the queen of the comments! Thanks for all the laughs, they were badly needed!

      • KatMc says:

        Hahahaha, hilarious! Yes, he does. Tom needs to F. Gump it out of there.

    • spittair says:

      And Katy Perry just retweeted her old tweet from 2015 “Time, the ultimate truth teller.”

    • LadyLoo says:

      Yeah, Katy is taking 0 prisoners and giving 0 f**cks.

    • Cricket says:

      If Hiddles isn’t in it to win it .. it’s gonna be a bumpy ride with more drama and characters than a Shakespearian play. We are in for an interesting, juicy summer.

      Glad Tay made all that $$ this year cause it’s gonna cost her a bunch to keep up her image – paying for all of Hiddles private holidays, new ray-bans, aquatalia grey shoes, polo jackets and whatever else he wants to continue his staring role. In addition to the cost for her PR to keep selling her story. I think she may be having second thoughts about all this and her play on revealing her lyrics on the CH song may back fire big time. Wasn’t Rhiana just snapped wearing a ‘Bitch I Know You Know’ hat… is she joining this circle of fun? She and Katy are still buds, no?

    • bonzo says:

      Yeah, when Calvin starts bitchin’ and spilling tea and Katy drops a truth bomb, it makes TIDDLES much more interesting.

      Michael K spoke my heartfelt feeling on the DL post: “I love it when us losers and loners get to gather around the green circle table in the corner of the junior high school cafeteria and watch as the popular kids publicly tear each other apart. It’s better than square pizza Fridays.”

      This is gossip at its best. I’m drinking this up.

  63. Caitiecait says:

    I am so ready for the Emmy noms tomorrow, I honestly doubt he gets one and I am curious to see how things will go from here.

    • Maire3 says:

      I’m awaiting the Emmy noms too. Sorta hoping Oscar Isaac snags a space for ‘Show Me a Hero’

      But if Hiddleston doesn’t make the cut, TnT is gonna be stage-coached for the next 6months. Saddle-up ya’ll – Golden Globe be the next prize.

  64. anon123 says:

    Please, make it happen. At this point the wedding would be a coup de grace.

  65. boss says:

    You mean, he has actually met Taytay and still wants to spend the rest of his life with her? Baffling.

  66. browniecakes says:

    Taylor go home. Tom go to work. Calvin and Kanye – get over it.

    • lilacflowers says:

      *Hands browniecakes a glass of champagne, then applauds*

      Tom seems to be the only one listening to you. He released another UNICEF video from Loki’s dressing room so he is at work. I doubt the other three will listen to anyone or that any of them will ever listen to reason.

      • Beach girl says:

        Did you see the video of him putting on the Loki wig? It melted my heart…

      • browniecakes says:

        It’s like Tom is trying to tell us he is still in there somewhere, isn’t it, that Tom still exists with Tom’s interests – Brexit Twitter post, Loki wig, UNICEF plea. Poor baby.

    • InvaderTak says:

      Add Katy Perry to the list. Kudos to Rhianna for staying out of it (so far).

  67. Andrea says:

    I will probably sound like a commitment phobe but if ANYONE even my dream celeb crush asked me to marry him after a month or even after 6 months, I’d go running for the hills! It skeeves me out when someone is that desperate to marry even if their light is on. And I am 35 (never been married 3 long term relationships haha).

  68. browniecakes says:

    I don’t see Tom, who can’t seem to get past the Brexit vote, jumping into the Tay fray.

  69. kok says:

    It would be kind of hilarious if all of this hubbub made him not get an emmy nod. I think he will, but I would be delighted if he was snubbed.

    You just KNOW Taylor wants to be on his arm for the Emmys.

    Her stans are so devoted and gullible.

  70. lucy says:

    I still want to give him more credit than this stupid headline.

  71. Smd says:

    Ladyloo and Browniecakes, bless you both. After an especially hellish day at the salt mines y’alls comments and a large glass of red wine are soothing my nerves. Ok just for the fun of it..say they get engaged and married. What and where is wedding venue? Rus sell and Ciara just did the English castle wedding. Beach? Vegas? Seriously, Tay has to have the moooosssttt amazing wedding ever, ever so what? Hot air balloon over a flower filled meadow full of wedding guests????

  72. Twinkle says:

    If he does propose to her after one month of dating he’s stupider than I thought.

  73. Smd says:

    Oh she might try to do that! Ok, swans, butterflies, dragonflies, hand embroidered invites personally delivered via horse and carriage, the girl squad bigger, badder, and dreseed by Wintours flunkie at the time. English component…I’m putting $ on an Downton Abbey themed extravaganza where Tommy Anne is Knighted and then he and Taytay are named Papspousesforlife…crowns…kisses..

  74. Browniecakes says:

    We may be on our way to our first fight instead of a proposal if this Calvin thing doesn’t wrap itself up soon. Maybe Gentleman Tom can challlenge Calvin to a duel.

  75. Miss Melissa says:

    Surely they’ll just quietly elope at a registry office somewhere, right?

  76. Anare says:

    I think Tay Tay has been seeing TH for a lot longer than the past month. I think she was two timing Calvin Harris since January or so and he is pissed with her whole love at first sight, cutesy act with TH. I don’t blame him. He will probably keep dribbling out insider scoop about her that will keep us entertained for months.

  77. browniecakes says:

    What’s really going on with Calvin and Tay? Maybe all the OTT traveling and PDA and I HEART T.S. bs and I want to meet Tom’s mother when I never met your mother has been just to piss off Calvin? Phot

  78. zazas says:

    I think he is painted into a corner and I feel a little sympathy. (I also think his tweet today was an attempt to call BS without getting into too much trouble. Imagine the NDA’s you’d have to sign!) The media and fans have been trying to ‘marry him off’ for years – no respect for single adulthood or just dating around as a life choice.

    I sincerely doubt he would commit to this degree after a month, in public, while working on his livelihood-project & bread-and-butter character. I don’t believe he invited TS to Australia.. I think she invited herself.

    • Christin says:

      I think it was more her idea than his to trek across several countries and accompany him to Oz. He’s obviously going along with all of it, but I do wonder if reality is going to set in within the next week or two (assuming it hasn’t already).

      She’s not going anywhere, unless he puts some ice on it by dropping the ‘English’ gentleman persona she’s apparently lapping up.

    • Secret squirrel says:

      Tay: whatcha doing?
      Tom: packing for Australia.
      Tay: can I come?
      Tom:
      Tay: Tommykins?
      Tom:
      Tay: Tom, can I come?
      Tom:
      Tay: Tooooooooom!
      Tom: I suppose
      Tay: oh goody
      Tom: you had better go pack
      Tay: My bags are already in the car
      Tom:
      Tay: You’ll be late if you just stand there staring at me silly boy!

  79. Sue says:

    Twitter wars, biting articles, medial mess, Tay´s squad, Tay´s business enemies etc.- that is the world Tom wants to live in willingly? Hm…

  80. PaschaP says:

    All I got from looking at that magazine cover is Hiddleston’s lips = Kylie Jenner pre lip injections.