Woody Allen on Ronan Farrow’s op-ed: ‘I find that all tabloid stupidity’

wenn25044005

Woody Allen’s Café Society has already come and gone from American theaters, but it’s getting its release in the UK next week, so Woody Allen is back on awkward promotional duty. Much like the promotion earlier this year, Woody tends to choose one or two big publications and he’ll give those outlets a lengthy interview. He never had a publicist/handler with him on these interviews, which is interesting to me. He obviously thinks he’s capable of “handling” the persistent questions about the accusations of child abuse. Woody usually makes it worse by brushing off those questions in a blasé way, like when he said in May that he “never thinks about” Dylan Farrow’s accusations, and that he never read Ronan Farrow’s op-ed.

Woody chose to speak to The Guardian to promote Café Society in the UK. He says at the very beginning that he doesn’t even think interviews help or hurt a film’s chances, but he still likes to feel like he’s pitching in on promotion. When asked directly about Ronan and Dylan, Woody gives a different kind of answer this time around, and he also cites this “open letter” to Ronan, where the author questions Ronan’s motives and arguments. You can read the full Guardian piece here. Some highlights:

He doesn’t hate the rich: “I’m not one of those people who has knee-jerk antipathy to wealth. I like to look at rich people. I enjoy taking a tour of a very wealthy estate.”

He spends $100 a week on lottery tickets, but doesn’t think life would change if he won: “I’ve talked this over with my wife. We would still go on living in the same house, I would go on working, I don’t want a boat, I don’t want a plane.” So why do it? He seems stumped. “The odds are bigger than astronomical. You’d have a better chance of shuffling a deck of cards and naming them all in row. I’ve never got more than two numbers. I’d probably shoot myself if I got five and missed by one. That would really be a killer – but I don’t have that problem.”

Whether some people are more driven by sex, wealth, art or politics: “Sex is the ultimate end. The ambition is so that they can fulfil their sexual drives; that’s what everybody is going for. This is what animals are. People are in a kind of meaningless jumble to recreate, and nobody knows why. The same woman who says, ‘People are terrible, life is awful, it’s sad, it’s short, nasty and meaningless’ still wants to have a couple of children. It defies any intellect. It’s strictly emotional.”

On the reported rise of antisemitism: “It doesn’t surprise me. It’s in the nature of people to have someone to scapegoat. If there were no Jews in the world they would take it out on blacks. If no blacks, they’d move over to Catholics. No Catholics? Something else. Finally, if everyone is exactly the same, the left-handed people would start killing the right-handed people. You just need an other [on whom] to vent your hostility and frustration… Hopefully, the wave will ebb and people will realise that’s not the problem and focus more on what the problems are. But the world is full of intolerance and prejudice. Freud said there would always be antisemitism because people are a sorry lot. And they are a sorry lot.”

Ronan’s letter, Dylan’s accusations: “I have no interest in all of that. I find that all tabloid stupidity. That situation had been thoroughly, thoroughly investigated up and down the line by New York social services in a 14-month investigation. It had been investigated by Yale and conclusions were clear and I have no interest in that whole situation. I get harassed all the time on it. But it doesn’t affect me and I just have no interest in it.”

His teenage daughters Bechet & Manzie with his wife Soon-Yi: “You can count on them until adolescence. You’re king in the house and you’re much needed and much loved and depended on. Once they start to come into their adulthood they start to field their oats, then, all of a sudden, it’s a different story.”

Relationships: “[They] are not my strong point in life. I’ve always been dependent on the generosity of the woman; nothing I could do ever seduced them.” That was the case with Diane Keaton, with whom he is still close: “She had come to the conclusion she liked me. It was always the other person who decided.”

He doesn’t do therapy anymore: “I don’t have to any more. I’m functioning OK. I’m in a happy marriage. I haven’t needed that support.”


[From The Guardian]

Does your skin crawl a little bit when you read some of these quotes? The way he discusses sex and the need to procreate, the way he discusses his teenage daughters, the way he says he’s never been able to seduce a woman, that the women have always chosen him? And once again, brushing off Ronan and Dylan’s accusations as harassment. *shiver*

wenn23847165

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

55 Responses to “Woody Allen on Ronan Farrow’s op-ed: ‘I find that all tabloid stupidity’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Erinn says:

    “You can count on them until adolescence. You’re king in the house and you’re much needed and much loved and depended on. Once they start to come into their adulthood they start to field their oats, then, all of a sudden, it’s a different story.””

    Ah … well THAT is incredibly disturbing in terms of this mans history. He’s disgusting.

    • Megan says:

      That just made my skin crawl. He is a vile, vile man.

    • Nicole says:

      Beyond vile. Ugh.
      Just seeing his movies (the old ones I haven’t seen anything since I was aware of the accusations years ago) you can SEE his perverse relationships with women play out on screen. it’s odd to say the least

      • marshmellow says:

        I noticed that too. In WA’s works, there’s a lot older women who are shrews and May-December relationships with manic pixie dream girls. It’s like he’s flaunting his gross perversions.

    • HH says:

      Here’s the thing… based upon his “seduction” quotes, is he saying Soon-Yi chose him?! Because….CLASSIC PREDATOR. To act as though they had no self control, the victim wanted them. UGH. MY SKIN IS CRAWLING.

      • detritus says:

        Yup. I’m sure she was ‘older than her years’, she ‘knew what she wanted’ and seduced this man who was her father. What a Lolita. No wonder Woody couldn’t help himself. A teenage girl against a grown man? She obviously had all the power and knew better than the adult what the right choice was. /s

      • Denise says:

        Yep. He just denied that he has ever been able to manipulate a woman (or girl probably) into wanting him. Gee I wonder why he automatically frames relationships that way…

    • tealily says:

      “Field their oats”… ? *Shudder*

      • adastraperaspera says:

        I agree that is the weirdest way to describe your kid’s adolescence. I would never think to describe our daughter using this phrase, because although I think “feel your oats” means being energetic, it just sounds a little too much like “sowing your oats,” which is a sexual reference. A strange choice of words.

    • silverunicorn says:

      The Guardian has first released this interview with this creep and molester, then proceeded to delete almost 2/3 of all the comments where the posters were calling him out for who he is (leaving published only the ones written by disgusting people who can ‘compartmentalise’; sorry I can’t divide the real person from the director or the scientist when the crimes are such of a serious and heinous nature) and then closed the comment section.

      Congrats Guardian, always worse eh…thank God I didn’t buy a copy of it in years…

  2. detritus says:

    I saw his name three times in the comments yesterday, and so he appears.

    Except he’s like the lecherous rumplestitskin, and I’d rather have Keaton.

  3. Bluebelle says:

    With the exception of the Dylan and Ronan quotes, because I will always believe them, this interview made me dislike him less; as if I found out Voldemort likes popcorn.

  4. Barrett says:

    He is so sick, such a mental patient. It is so obvious in his dialogue. He is clearly a pervert in the criminal sense.

    • Denise says:

      Don’t group him with ‘mental patients’. Mental illness doesn’t mean you are a depraved abuser. What is wrong with him is pathological. It is not an illness that can be cured.

  5. Mia4S says:

    I need a shower. 😷

    Well after all that publicity from this trash, Stewart, and Lively at least the movie did not even manage $10 million at the domestic box office. (I’m proud of you USA and Canada).

  6. Birdie says:

    Umm, does he pretend he’s poor? And that he is not interested in wealth but buys lottery tickets every week for 100$?! Wtf? I couldn’t even read him talking about sex. He repulses me.

    • Cate says:

      Yeah, isn’t that super weird!? His net worth is around 80 million… I mean, if he doesn’t think that’s rich he can give it to me and I’ll keep 10% and give the rest to charity. RIdiculous!

    • Samtha says:

      That made me roll my eyes so hard. We’re pretending he’s not affluent now? Okay then.

    • tealily says:

      Yeah, it’s really easy not to have a “knee-jerk antipathy to wealth” when you’re wealthy AF.

  7. tracking says:

    The man is a narcissistic sociopath.

  8. SM says:

    I try not to look at this creep. But his face is really strange especially the eyes – did he have a stroke or something? Or does he have some neurological problem? That would explain some of his “thoughts”.

  9. mkyarwood says:

    Holding out hope for those 5 numbers, Woody!

  10. PunkyMomma says:

    I’d probably shoot myself if I got five and missed by one. We can only hope Woody. Creeper.

  11. jeanpierre says:

    Go away you filthy molester.

  12. minx says:

    Disgusting old perv.

  13. SusanneToo says:

    He certainly makes a lot of generalizations, as if he knows everything about human nature.

  14. Sam says:

    He talks like a man who’s been isolated in a praise bubble for so long that now he’s effectively out of touch. His last movie did not do very well, I don’t think. Just goes to show that people need to keep talking about Dylan and what happened, and maybe people will start to vote with their dollars and maybe, finally, he’ll fade away.

  15. adastraperaspera says:

    Reminds me of my sex predator uncle, who now that he is in his 80s is treated like some wise old soul. Like just because it all happened so long ago and the sisters he abused are dead we have to cut him slack. It makes me sick. But this is how it perpetuates.

  16. Who says says:

    He is an 80 year old man with a license to say anything he wants. Give him a platform and he will tout his views. It still is gross to me that he married the daughter( step daughter, even though they weren’t married) of Mia Farrow, so I stopped watching his films.

  17. Anare says:

    I didn’t know he had kids with Soon Yi. Yeesh. It’s just all kinds of wrong. I’m sorry I even read this blurb. He needs to be given complete shade.

    • firsttimer says:

      I heard that his kids with Soon Yi are adopted.

      • Not A Fan says:

        They are adopted, one looks like Dylan and one looks like Soon-Yi, almost as if he cherry-picked his next victims based on his preferences. It’s amazing what you can get away with if you’re wealthy.

    • MrsBPitt says:

      Yes, he and Soon Yi adopted two daughters….those poor girls….

  18. Marty says:

    Two things I learned from this interview:

    1. I never want to hear this man talk about sex. EVER.

    2. It’s grossly obvious with every interview he does that he really hates women. He doesn’t even talk about them like their people.

    • sanders says:

      His list of groups who face discrimination has a glaring omission-Muslims. Just in the past two weeks, there have been two murders of muslim men in the US. An imam and his assistant was gunned down in NY and a Lebanese man was shot dead by his white neighbour, because he hates muslims. Prior to killing this man, he’d hit the victim’s mother with his car.

      Woody Allen is the last person who should have a public forum to share his ‘insights’ regarding women, girls and minorities. Yet there he is, a full article in the Guardian. White male privilege at its most obvious.

      • Marty says:

        Yes, I read about Khalid Jabara’s death last week. What’s even more depressing is that he called the police before he was shot and they did nothing.

        I seriously doubt though that Woody Allen thinks about anyone but himself. So, his clueless attitude about society isn’t all that surprising.

      • sanders says:

        Well he did list ‘Blacks and Catholics’. I don’t think he cares about anyone but himself and was just using these examples to prove his Hobbesian point that human nature is vile. I disagree with this premise, though Woody is trying my optimism. Interestingly, he left out the group that is currently facing high levels of violence and hatred.

      • Gretchen says:

        A minor point, but the Jabara family are Christians. The killer cited his hatred for them as “dirty Arabs”.

    • Denise says:

      You’re right. He’s completely disconnected from women in every way, even criticising the whole gender as being unintellectual, irrational and emotional in that one quote.

  19. Tough Cookie says:

    I had never heard the expression “field their oats” and couldn’t figure out what it meant LOL. So I looked up the link to the Guardian article and sure enough the actual phrase used was “feel their oats.”

    • tealily says:

      “Feel their oats” makes even less sense than “field their oats.” I assumed it was like “sowing your wild oats.” No?

      • Soup2Nuts says:

        “Feel their oats” is an oblique equine reference about well-fed, spirited horses. So he’s literally comparing his daughters to livestock.

  20. Diane says:

    I looked on IMDb and since 2009 more of his movies have bombed than succeeded. Only a couple made money and they were not extravagant. I havent seen any of his movies in many years. Critics And HW seem to like him, but it does seem the movie public not so much.

  21. Josefina says:

    I couldn’t even read the whole piece. Reading those quotes knowing of his past and reputation was so bizarre and disturbing.

  22. holly hobby says:

    Ugh this pervert should go back to eating his metamucil and stop talking. I’m waiting for a tell all book from his girls with Soon Yi.

  23. Miss S says:

    “That situation had been thoroughly, thoroughly investigated up and down the line by New York social services in a 14-month investigation.”

    What do we know about this?

  24. Gretchen says:

    “It doesn’t surprise me. It’s in the nature of people to have someone to scapegoat. If there were no Jews in the world they would take it out on blacks.” Yeah because if there weren’t Jews to take society’s hatred it would really be tough for Black people, the effects of white supremacism have been so low key for them up until now??

  25. khaveman says:

    I still find a man who marries his daughter to be disturbing. Woody is sick, IMO. In a way of “social norms don’t apply to me” or “I twist them to work for my needs.” You can count on them until adolescence – like they then do him wrong by growing up and thinking for themselves. WTH

  26. sarah says:

    Yuck! Amazing that he is still working & protected by the industry. Wonder how many more pedophiles & sexual predators are protected in this business? There needs to be a full investigation to out all these monsters.

  27. Jen says:

    Yes ” thoroughly investigated ” with the finding that he shouldn’t have unsupervised visitation.

  28. Justjj says:

    I have zero likes and zero respect for any actor who apologizes for or works with this predatory leech. What a POS. Cmon five numbers.