The Daily Beast: Prince William & Kate are ‘very spoiled & indulged’

BAFTA 2017 - Arrivals

As I’ve said before, I really enjoy Tom Sykes at the Daily Beast. He’s their resident royal-reporter/royal analyst guy. He doesn’t travel with the royal press pack, but I get the feeling that he knows those reporters and he often reports what they’re telling him, anonymously of course. So Sykes has an exclusive about the Work-Shy Cambridges, because ‘tis the season to talk about how little the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge actually do. It’s worth noting that Will and Kate have made some improvements in the first two months of this year: they’ve done a lot more – or they’ve seemed to do a lot more – in January and February as opposed to years past, when their Christmas holiday seems to bleed into St. Patrick’s Day coverage. Still, Sykes points out that William and Kate only have a few events scheduled between now and their March 17-18 trip to Paris. William and Kate are already back in Norfolk, apparently. And the royal reporters are bitching about how “spoiled” they are. Some highlights:

Kate’s schedule following her appearance at the Air Cadets event on V-Day: “The next day the shutters went up, Kate and William retreated to Norfolk and, astonishingly, Kate only has three public appearances between now and that trip to France. The first is next Wednesday (February 22), when she will undertake her first engagement as the royal patron of Action for Children, visiting mental health projects for children in Wales. Kate has another engagement on the last day of February in London, opening the Ronald McDonald House at Evelina London Children’s Hospital. Aside from a church service on March 9, Kate will otherwise be out of public view until the Paris trip.”

The Cambridges don’t want to give up their life in the country: “Despite extensive counsel to the contrary, it seems William and Kate are not yet ready to give up the leisured life they have for some years been enjoying with their ‘Turnip Toff’ landowning friends in the backwaters of Norfolk, a hundred miles from the capital and any serious, sustained press scrutiny. Their argument is that they are busy working behind the scenes, and raising their kids, and that making sure the next generation of royalty is as sane and balanced as possible is just as important work as cutting ribbons.”

Sympathy is waning for Will & Kate, especially when they talk about how “hard” it is to be parents: As one well-informed British commentator who wished to remain anonymous told the Daily Beast: “Whenever he talks about how hard parenthood is you realize he has no idea how his choices come across.” The commentator says this is, “partly because no one dares tell him that doing so little looks pathetic; they surround themselves with yes people including staff and friends. They are very spoiled and indulged.”

The journalists talk among themselves: “Certainly, the persistent chatter among the journalists who cover the royal beat is informed by constant disbelief of how little the Cambridges do, despite regular admonishments in the press… If William and Kate do slip up, the press, who have showed Olympian levels of restraint in their coverage of the royals in recent years, will eat them alive, so heavily built up is the resentment from a series of sleights, non-co-operation and attempts to cut them out of the picture.”

[From The Daily Beast]

Yes, pretty much. William and Kate consistently sound out-of-touch and oblivious to the real concerns of honest-to-God normal blokes. They seem more out-of-touch than Prince Charles, for the love of God.

Sykes also notes that he contacted the Kensington Palace press office about Kate’s event schedule and KP apparently re-sent him the statement from Christmas about being “keen to continue to increase their official work on behalf of The Queen and for the charities and causes they support.” They literally think that just promising to be keen is somehow equal to working. Sykes ends the story by noting that William still doesn’t listen to his father’s advice and Will “only hires youthful advisers who will agree with him.” Yep. I would argue that there’s another problem with William that usually goes unremarked on: William thinks he has his mother’s public relations and media instincts. He does not. There’s a consistent problem with William thinking he’s being very clever with the media when in fact he’s showing how dull and amateurish his whole operation is.

BAFTA 2017 - Arrivals

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

183 Responses to “The Daily Beast: Prince William & Kate are ‘very spoiled & indulged’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Guest says:

    “William thinking he’s being very clever with the media” – I heard that Wills, Kate and Harry are not that nice to journalists, sometimes they don’t even say hello etc.

    • notasugarhere says:

      With Harry, it depends on the occasion. At a recent event for the three of them, he followed William’s lead and said nothing. Ditto when they were doing flood work on “personal time”.

      Solo times? Harry jokes around with the media, he has off-the-record pub nights on tours, and plays with them at engagements (Arthur Edwards and the purple hand print come to mind).

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        Yes – a solo Harry is much more media friendly which only further proves that the hate is coming from William. Kate may not love the press per se but she loves the attention they give her.

  2. IMO says:

    No one takes him seriously when he says that parenthood is hard. I’m pretty sure when Charlotte or George don’t behave it’s the nannies who take care of them, not William or Catherine.

    • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

      No one outside the Middleton family takes him seriously and at some level he knows it which is part of his attitude problem. As for the kids, their parenting is split between the nannies and Queen Carole.

      • IMO says:

        Are you sure the Middletons take him seriously? I often have the feeling they are just using him (especially Carole) and think “what an idiot”…

      • notasugarhere says:

        I doubt they take him seriously either. His position was the end goal, not the man himself. It must have taken time to figure out how to work around his Uncle David-and-Diana-like temperament and manipulate him. Once they figured out the keys, as long as they stick to them – and he never figures out – they’re fine.

    • Tata says:

      It would be awesome if harry and Megan had a baby and then outworked Will and Kate despite being parents. Please God make this happen 🙂

  3. Clare says:

    The sky is blue, water is wet, and these two do nothings are spoiled brats. Tell me something new.

    Somehow the rest of us manage to raise children AND have 40 hours a week (or more) jobs. Imagine that.

  4. Emmy says:

    Charles should cut off their funding, enough with this laziness already!

  5. MunichGirl says:

    Well, it will be sure interesting times when William and Kate are King and Queen Consort.

  6. Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

    I read that article and it was quite amusing but it is true – they are treading on thin ice with the UK media in particular. Its not so much about them slipping up, its more about them pissing the press off to the point where they don’t give an eff about the repercussions. It will be interesting when Charles takes the throne, he’s not above sic’ing the media on those who step out of line.

    Also, they are ripping off Chuck and Cams – they have copied their Thank You notes copy WORD for WORD. These 2 really take being lazy to another level. They are clueless and just don’t care. They live only to please themselves.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Cribbing C&C’s thank you notes? Now even their staff are lazy.

    • graymatters says:

      At least they’re writing thank-you notes. That’s new for them, right?

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        Well, these ones appear to have been spell checked before being sent. There was one instance when a Thank You was sent that was full of typos and grammatical errors. Which them made it into the press.

    • Llamas says:

      @digital unicorn,

      Where are the rip off notes and where are the ones with typos? I kind of remember there was one with typos but I can’t exactly remember what was specifically wrong.

  7. Heat says:

    I don’t even see how this is news. They are ROYALTY, fgs! Are we supposed to expect them to be like everyone else? Historically, has any member of any royal family ever been completely in touch with ‘the little people’?

    • Ever bloom says:

      “Royalty” belongs in Disneyland.

    • bluhare says:

      I wouldn’t expect them to live a life that is like ours, but I do expect them to have some empathy and understanding of it. Kate has no excuse, and William with his playing house should have a feel for it too except for . . . staff. And . . . . . . staff. And . . . . . . not exactly working full time.

    • Tina says:

      “The work you do is the rent you pay for the room you occupy on earth.”
      -The Queen Mother

    • notasugarhere says:

      It helps if they marry the right person, someone who can do the royal job while also giving it the side-eye. Harald of Norway (Sonya) and Felipe of Spain (Letizia) are a couple that come to mind.

      Tina, that is a great quote.

    • Talie says:

      I’d be curious to know if other euro royal families get this kind of local coverage too…or maybe not if they have free press issues?

    • Susannah says:

      Is there any consequence though to the Cambridges not doing any work? I don’t think the UK will get rid of the monarchy anytime soon, so their jobs are secure as they can’t really be fired. It doesn’t seem like they care what the press or public really thinks of them anyway, so they can continue being lazy without any changes to their lifestyle.

      • LAK says:

        I think the issue is that they haven’t had a crisis to shake them out of their complacency or world view. Eg George V was faced with the toppling Monarchies world wide, so he did what he needed to do to make sure it didn’t happen in Britain. George 6 and our current Queen faced the fallout of the abdication so they did what they needed to do to survive. Charles and our current Queen faced hurticane Diana so they did what they needed to do to survive.

        William and Kate haven’t had any sort of challenge to their position beyond some vaguely unpleasant articles that are easily shrugged off.

      • notasugarhere says:

        That’s really interesting, LAK. What if they lose the France lawsuit? Do you think that would bring about a bigger crisis, re. William’s response to an *all bets are off, all photos in public places allowed* mentality from the press? Or something else? A Middleton money scandal?

      • LAK says:

        The only certainty about a crisis is that you never know where it will come from. The only thing to do is to course correct so that it doesn’t derail you.

        These two people do not appear to have the depth to course correct judging by how they’ve handled minor kerfuffles.

        And surrounding themselves with yes men is a receipe for disaster.

  8. Talie says:

    Did everyone read the Lainey blind about Kate and Meghan? Meg is really gonna get under their skin if she becomes official, clearly!

    • mary mary says:

      I searched Lainey’s website but could not locate that particular blind. It seems the only Lainey blind was dated February 20, I somehow missed it.

    • Emmy says:

      That is made up gossip. How could Lainey possibly know what happens between Kate and Meghan in private?

      • Fiorella says:

        I would assume because she has a contact that knows Megan or maybe there are more links of separation. Of course you’re right it could be absolutely made up. I thought of them immediately though! Obviously I spend too much time on Lainey and here.

      • SP says:

        Lainey is Toronto based, and so is Megan, when she’s working on Suits. They both work in the entertainment industry, which in Toronto is pretty cozy. I would imagine there are several overlaps in their circles. Example: Megan is buddies with Jessica Mulroney, who is married to Ben Mulroney, who is Lainey’s coworker.

      • PIa says:

        Lainey works with Ben Mulroney (both host an “E!” type show), and they’re friendly.

        Ben Mulroney’s wife is BFFs with Meghan Markle.

        Toronto is a small town, I wouldn’t be surprised if Lainey now got more exclusives from Harry and Meghan.

      • Birdee says:

        There is a very close link. Elaine Lui (Lainey’s real name from Lainey Gossip) works for CTV media (Canadian Broadcast network). Specifically, she works on e-talk, which is a celebrity focused entertainment show ( a la Entertainment Tonight). Guess who hosts e-talk? Ben Mulroney. Ben Mulroney’s wife, Jessica Mulroney, is “besties” with Meghan Markle.

      • Lady D says:

        LOL at Toronto is a small town. I know what you mean when you say it’s a small town, (everybody knows each other) it’s just funny to hear of a city of 2.8 million described as a small town.

      • original kay says:

        Ben Mulroney, son of former PM “I sing for dictators” Mulroney?

        small world.

      • Daisy says:

        Yes, that Ben — son of Brian.
        How do you think Ben got into entertainment journalism in the first place? He’s good looking (if you like that type) and jolly and inoffensive, but not particularly smart. Perfect job for the son of a former PM.
        (TBH, I’m not sure Justin T., son of Pierre, is that much smarter than Ben M.)

      • Birdee says:

        @Daisy – Agreed – Justin Trudeau is a complete airhead. Listen to him speak or interview on the radio. If you can sit through the gazillions “uhs”, there isn’t much original thought/content in his speech. He’s mostly talking points, which he repeats over and over – much like a beauty pageant contestant. I gave him the benefit of the doubt on so many occasions, but hearing him have a dynamic conversation is painful, because he’s just not a sufficiently educated social/economic policy person, so he can’t think on his feet. Suffice it to say, without that beautiful face and definitely without that pedigree, he would not have a place in public politics.

        It’s an entire circle of lifestyle/entertainment peddling talking-heads disguised as substance – Sophie Gregoire (his wife, also a former entertainment reporter), Ben Mulroney (former Pm’s Son, host of E-talk), Jessica Brownstein (Ben Mulroney’s Wife, heiress of the Browns Shoes Fortune and the face of Kleinfeld Bridal in Canada). Meghan Markle is right up in that bunch.

    • dodgy says:

      Which blind? Link?

    • albalilium says:

      Yeah right, because women always have to hate each other.

      • Llamas says:

        It’s not women always have to be pitted against each other; it’s more that Oatr has a history of putting HERSELF against other women. There was that Chelsea Davy “cheating comes with it” quote from KM. There was the Beatrice showing up to a themed party in regular dress incident. There have been countless stories about how KM was like a preying hawk when dating Billy – so protective of her spot she would be nasty to other women because they were a “threat.” Im sure there are more but point being Waity isn’t very kind to women because she has a complex where she needs to be BMOC.

    • notasugarhere says:

      I doubt Lainey has any inside info on this one. Multiple outlets have been spinning stories of KM vs. MM for months now.

      • SP says:

        NASH, this is one that rings true to me. Like I mentioned above, Lainey and MM most likely have quite a bit of overlap in their Toronto social circles, and it sounds like a story you would tell your girlfriends. I know I giggle with my friends about weird interactions with people, and repeat stories that were told to me (gossip 1.0!), and our stories don’t even involve famous people.

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        I dunno – Lainey rarely posts Blind Items and they tend to be on the money. Lainey can be way off the mark sometimes in her gossip but I wouldn’t say she was guilty of outright lying/stirring trouble.

      • LadyT says:

        Lainey’s blinds are legitimate IMO. At least very high standards required before posting. Not the average blind item BS.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Lainey’s “accuracy” in articles or blinds appears to depend upon the person – and whether or not she likes them. I remember all manner of articles when her articles and blinds were inaccurate because she didn’t like the person in question. In her own way, she’s as biased as Handler.

      • Adele Dazeem says:

        I tend to believe Lainey on this blind…because, well, it isn’t really all *that* shocking or sensational. I’ve never heard any stories of Kate’s amazing warmth, friendliness or girl-friendliness. If anything, it would be more of a shock to hear she was being open and welcoming to Meghan.

    • HoustonGrl says:

      To be fair, Harry has had a lot of girlfriends, who’s to say whether this one is serious or not? Markle has made references to this relationship on social media and that’s a big no no in royal circles. There is no reason KM should take MM shopping, esp when the paparazzi would have a field day with that money shot. I’m not as convinced as many that Markle is the one. If the blind is real, even less so.

  9. Jennifer says:

    For me, it comes down to the fact that neither William or Kate are very nice people. You can dress it up any which way, but that’s the fact as I see it. It will always come back to this.

    • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

      Yep – its also telling that the press have stopped trying to hide it and are now openly reporting on how unpleasant they both are.

      • Citresse says:

        Yes because they make no attempt to hide their laziness. They hit new lows while on their tour of Canada last year. William admitting he hadn’t read his notes and Kate often so rude, she wouldn’t acknowledge her hosts.

      • notasugarhere says:

        What grates to me is their defense of their laziness a la “Who will think of the poor royal children, who cannot be happy if their parents work 10 hours a week?” line.

  10. Sixer says:

    I have come to greatly dislike the word keen. That is all.

    • littlemissnaughty says:

      Is that even used much in everyday language? I’m of course not a native speaker but I do read/watch a lot in English on a daily basis and I don’t remember encountering that word much before these two made a mockery of its meaning.

      Also, I say take ’em down. They haven’t earned anything, they refuse to earn any of the perks, and they’re boring. That’s their greatest sin in my book. How can two relatively young people be so dusty and crusty? And what’s holding back the press?

      • Sixer says:

        I thought it was just a common or garden word but now if I hear it, I think Katie Keen and it’s like fingernails on a chalk board!

        The tabloid press, I think, is in a conundrum. They like a bit of royal bashing in usual times but these aren’t usual times for British tabloids – these are Brexit, bash-the-migrant, big up everything Little Englander times. And Little Englanders like the monarchy. So it’s tricky for them right now.

      • swak says:

        From dictionary.com: “A popular word of approval in teenager and student slang from c.1900.” Not used in everyday language. Think it was also popular in the 50’s. IIRC, it was used in the tv show “Leave it to Beaver” – Eddie Haskell, I believe, used it a lot. Goodness, I’m showing my age!

      • Sharon Lea says:

        Katie Keen haha

      • Sixer says:

        I’m sitting thinking about it now! And, pondering, I’m pretty sure I’d only use keen in everyday speech in a negative way.

        “Do you like comic book movies, Sixer?”
        “No, I’m not keen.”

        It’s kind of that way we Britishers use euphemistic phrases to be polite – cos what I’d really mean is:

        “Do you like comic book movies, Sixer?”
        “No, I can’t effing stand them.”

      • littlemissnaughty says:

        Interesting. So the tabloids need to pick their readership right now?

        @swak: Thanks. I will never not associate it with these two now. Yikes. Just like I can’t take the word “sad” as just an exclamation anymore. Use it in a full sentence or I’ll scream.

      • Sixer says:

        I think it must have something to do with why they are holding off somewhat because this level of wankery by a lesser royal would usually be the stuff of foaming hysteria by now. Her Maj will always be off limits.

      • littlemissnaughty says:

        Sixer, you guys have elevated that to an art form. Drove me insane. Germans are polite (well, mostly) but we don’t beat around the bush like that. It’s like you need a separate dictionary. “Oh no, it’s fine.” Really? NO! “Go f*ck yourself.”

      • Sixer says:

        You would like Mr Sixer – he is not like that. And he was stationed in Germany for a few years when he was in the army. He loves German people for that very reason: “They say what they mean, Sixer. It’s a bloody relief.”

        !!

      • dodgy says:

        Katy Keen is a play on Katy Keene – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katy_Keene

        A character in the Archie Comics who used to be a brunnette Barbie

      • Sharon Lea says:

        Thanks Dodgy – I wasn’t aware of the Archie Comics character.

    • dawnchild says:

      Keen was a word in all those Enid Blyton books that afflicted us growing up in India in the 70s and 80s. How Marjorie would be picked for the school hockey team because she was awfully keen,…etc.
      barf*

      • dylan says:

        I left Delhi/AIS in 1972. Lived in Karachi 67-69. LOVED Enid Blyton and I can attest to Enid’s influence. Fab Five forever!

      • bluhare says:

        I loved those books!! Mallory Towers!

      • teacakes says:

        awwww I loved Enid Blyton! Though I was fonder of St Clare’s than Malory Towers. I still remember being fascinated by their midnight feasts – tongue and potted meat (no such thin existed in India) and all that.

    • lyla says:

      omg yes. i was reading a recommendation my cousin wrote about her employees and she used the word keen and i rolled my eyes. ugh. i can’t with that word and keen katie.

  11. justsaying says:

    It’s not very smart to have the media as an enemy…

  12. Odell says:

    I really start to understand the people who want to get rid of the monarchy after TQ is gone. There are so many Rexit comments lately etc

  13. Dawnchild says:

    “William thinks he has his mother’s public relations and media instincts. He does not.” Not to mention that was the 80’s and 90’s. Pre-9/11, pre-social media, pre so much of today’s concerns and angst…feels like it was a simpler time in many respects. So no, that playbook is way out of date. And how’re they ‘preparing’ those kids by being so disconnected from reality themselves?

    • Adele Dazeem says:

      I would also add that Tina Brown in her book The Diana Chronicles said that while Diana was a great tactician, she wasn’t strong with strategy, aka the long game.

      • Montréalaise says:

        Exactly. While Diana was very good at getting what she wanted when she wanted it, she rarely considered the long-term consequences of her actions. The Panorama interview was a perfect example – she wanted to stick it to the BRF, especially Charles, and she did. What she didn’t foresee was that the BRF would retaliate by demanding that she and Charles divorce so that she would no longer be a member of the Firm – something she definitely did not want to happen.

      • Jeesie says:

        Yes. Diana was constantly creating issues for herself with her media tactics. She was good at putting out the fires she started, but someone who was actually great with the press would have just avoided starting the fires altogether. For every successful attack on Charles and the BRF, she opened herself up to the same line of attack, and she never seemed to learn from that.

        I feel like her death also made people remember her last year with some heavily rose tinted glasses. She’d lost the BRF’s protection so the media was freely writing all about all manner of things, from her eating disorders to her tantrums to her affairs to her weird obsession with her psychic etc. Between the press being let loose and her yacht hopping with Dodi, her image was taking a battering, and she wasn’t remotely successful in her attempts to shut that down or divert attention elsewhere.

  14. minx says:

    Well, William and Kate are only the latest in a long line of spoiled and indulged “royals.”

  15. LondonLozza says:

    Maybe Brad Pitt still has some goodwill knocking around he can put their way??

  16. Cerys says:

    The Lamebridges are both a waste of space. The sooner they are kicked into touch the better. Making an enemy of the press is not a good move and will come back to haunt them eventually, I hope. I’m amazed at the kid glove treatment they have had up to now.
    If the criticism gets too much, there will be photos of George and Charlotte released and everyone will coo over them and the Lamebridges will be off the hook again.

    • notasugarhere says:

      I expect CC birthday photos, taken by KM, to drag attention from the France trial in May. And *someone* will manage to get photos of PGTips and CC as attendants at Pippa’s wedding. W&K will not complain about those pap photos making it to press, imagine that. Unless Carole has decided to sell the whole thing to Hello magazine. I wonder if they’ll crop the nannies out of the photos again?

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        I wouldn’t be surprised if it features in Hello – they are trying to make Pippa the next big thing, as well as using her wedding as a distraction. It’ll also feature plugs for the brands/companies that they comped freebies from – they do love their freebies!

  17. WendyNerd says:

    Keeny Katie keen as pie
    Told to work but don’t know why
    When the peasants say time to play
    Work-shy Wills will whine all day

  18. Katherine says:

    Maybe they just don’t have a clue what it is that they are supposed to work at? Cause I don’t have the faintest idea what they should be doing all day – charity work, I’m assuming? But if they never really worked anywhere real where they had actual responsibilities, how would they know how to work for their own charities where they are the boss (I’m assuming) and can do whatever. What bugs me is the busy raising children part, everyone I know who raises children also works, and barely anyone ever brings any attention to that effort, like they would talk about kids, sure, but not keep saying how hard it is. Just weird imho

    • notasugarhere says:

      There are a dozen other working members of the Family Firm they could use as role models. People who managed to work 200+ engagements a year while raising young children. He could talk to his father, who founded The Prince’s Trust at 28. That organization has helped over 800,000 people in the UK get job training and start their own businesses.

      Go ask Aunt Sophie for advice. She worked more in the year she was expecting Louise than Kate Middleton ever has worked (expecting or not). And in the year she nearly died birthing Louise and after that birth. Her two kids are raised quietly in the country, while Edward (9th in line) and Sophie continue working more for the Family Firm than W&K.

      Their constant excuses and bashing of working parents needs to go.

      • Maria says:

        Right on. And if she claims to be best buddies with Princess Mary of Denmark, ask her what she does. Ten years older, 4 children, and she is always on the go. What’s more she has learned a new language and seems to enjoy what she is doing. Waity still has trouble with English, and clearly doesn’t want to be working.

      • Maria says:

        Right on! And if Waity is such good buddies with Princess Mary of Denmark, she should use her as as role model. Ten years older, four children, she has learned a new language and she still does lots of engagements and seems to enjoy it. Kate still has trouble with English, does few engagements and seems to find the whole thing just too much. I bet we have another pregnancy soon.

      • L84Tea says:

        Mary of Denmark is one of my favorite royals–elegant, poised, and always working.

      • Adele Dazeem says:

        And for what it’s worth, most all parenting books/experts tout the benefits of children having time away from their parents** to socialize. Perhaps this is coming from a working mother trying to assuage her mommy guilt, lol, but I can definitely see the difference between the children that went to preschool, possibly day care of some sort, spent time around many others besides the immediate family and those who were sequestered at home with a couple of relatives. There is something to be said for social skills.

        **I guess I should footnote this and say that by “time away from the parents” I mean while the parents work a day job, not long vacations a few times a year in Mustique. Lol. Not the same.

      • tigerlily says:

        Mary of Denmark actually had a life before meeting and marrying Frederick. She has a combined Commerce and Laws degree and travelled and worked before she met F. She seems very intelligent and definitely not lazy. So I guess what I am saying is she has nada in common with Kate and I sincerely doubt they are buddies.

        It must be so disappointing to QEII. She and Prince Philip are so hard working as are other lesser members of The Firm. And Charles is no slouch, he has always kept busy and done worth while projects.

    • LA Elle (formerly Elle R.) says:

      Princess Victoria of Sweden is another great example. Not only do she and Daniel work hard, but they also seem to be doing a really good job of balancing a private family life with introducing their children to their role as public figures.

  19. Sharon Lea says:

    Charles always got hammered for being at Highgrove back in the 80s and 90s, so William learned it from dear old Dad.

    What does, “…the press, who have showed Olympian levels of restraint in their coverage…” infer?!?!? Are there deep seated problems or just that they don’t call them out on bad behavior within an article, but let the comment sections do it for them?

    • Nic919 says:

      The press knows a lot more than they publish. Like where Will happens to be when he isn’t pretending to co pilot a chopper, which isn’t very often. And kate is seen shopping a lot, but those pics don’t get published.

      And perhaps the use of the word Olympian is also a reference to the photos taken when they were supposed to be at the para Olympics. There is a trial coming up so perhaps this was a shot across the bow from the press to W and K.

    • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

      It infer’s that the press have a ton of sh!t on them that they have stashed in a drawer somewhere that they haven’t published even after all the legal threats and bad treatment i.e. the hike up a mountain in Bhutan where Jason got into it with the broadcasters over W&K demanding ‘private time’ in the middle of an official engagement in front of their hosts the King and Queen.

    • dodgy says:

      What does, “…the press, who have showed Olympian levels of restraint in their coverage…” infer?!?!

      Loads of stuff. Like the time kate middleton’s dress blew up on one of her tours, showing her thong to the world, and the Royal Family asked the press to put the kibosh on the photographs, for example. So we had to look to the German press to see what the kerfuffle was about.

    • Sharon Lea says:

      I had forgotten about all of those nude pics that weren’t allowed to be printed in the UK. Actually, you all made points I had forgotten, there are quite a few! But there is a lot about Charles too, all that stuff about Michael Fawcett and the ‘squeezing of his toothpaste’ for him who continues to do his personal party planning wink wink. Will it ever come out?

      • notasugarhere says:

        In his defense, Charles had a broken collarbone at the time of the toothpaste bit. But yes, as LAK has said, he lives like an Edwardian gentleman.

    • LA Elle (formerly Elle R.) says:

      It’s similar to a lot of high-level public figures (politicians, celebrities, sports figures) – the press usually knows a lot more than what they publish. It’s part of building a relationship. Both sides know there’s something to be gained from taking the long view and working together (to an extent) and developing a level of trust.

      It’s a big reason why I think the US media has taken off the gloves in recent weeks: Drumpf and his minions have made it clear they view the media as a parasite rather than a partner, and so journalists seem to have been let off their leashes. While it’s overdue, it’s also too little, too late – but one would hope the Cambridges would maybe take this as a lesson for why it’s good to have the media on their side.

  20. Citresse says:

    They might as well spend the next few weeks lounging in the Caribbean because their PR can’t get much worse unless you read certain publications such as Hello and People which continue to praise them no matter what and People calling Kate, “Princess Kate.”
    I’ve stated this before: the late James Whitaker knew Kate wasn’t right for the BRF and he likely knew the Middletons would be a bad influence on William.

  21. Snarky_Lurker says:

    This article and the Lainey blind (if true) smell a bit like a lil like a bit of media manipulation from Harry’s side. I think Megan has more media game than anyone on the Cambridge side. That, combined with the fact that Harry appears ready to throw himself in front of a bus for her could lead to some gossip fireworks IMO.

    However, I think the Cambridges are fools to not realize the press is sitting on a powder keg of info that they’ll light up if they get ticked off enough.

    • notasugarhere says:

      No matter whom Harry is with, the media will/has pit that person against KM. Just as they did with Diana and Sarah. This is nothing new.

      When it comes to media game, Meghan Markle would barely rank in comparison to the BRF, Charles, and the Middletons. She knows how to be in the public eye, run a successful site, and be on social media. Nothing in comparison to those other three.

    • LA Elle (formerly Elle R.) says:

      My personal theory is that the press likes Harry better than the Cambridges, and the opportunity to take digs at Kate and Will via Harry’s new relationship is just too good to pass up.

  22. Chrissy says:

    What’s all this “working behind the scenes” stuff? I never understood what the phrase actually meant in relation to these two lay-abouts. Picking out outfits and ordering around servants hardly seems like working behind the scenes. I feel most sorry for their chariities. The Lamebridges’ rare and half-hearted appearances can’t be much use for charities that count on the Royals to raise public awareness and funds for their causes. Enough is enough with these two!

  23. Tessa says:

    Once Liz and Phil kick the bucket, I think we will be a republic in all but name. The only royal anyone likes is Harry and he doesn’t want to be one

  24. Kitty says:

    Do you think they look down on people?

  25. L84Tea says:

    Seriously, what was Kate’s ultimate end game in the grand scheme of things–endless shopping and nothing else?

    • Maria says:

      Certainly not working!

    • Lady D says:

      Good question. I wonder if she thought her life would be constantly having people bowing at her feet, wearing fabulous jewels and gorgeous clothes, all while traveling the world in luxury to be admired by everyone? Or maybe she’s just looking forward to being able to order everyone in her sight line around. Deep down competitive Katy is keen to see her mother and sister curtsy to her:)

      • L84Tea says:

        I could see how someone could be “hungry” to be the next Diana, in that they are out there doing extensive good work WHILE looking fabulous and living a life of luxury, almost trying to out-do Diana in a sense. But it baffles me how excruciatingly little Kate is content to do.

      • Kitty says:

        I think she wanted to be the next Diana.

    • TheOtherOne says:

      I am not sure Kate had her own personal endgame; only Carole’s. That’s unfortunate because I don’t see this ending well. The pressure is getting to her, the press is ready to take the gloves off and she doesn’t have the support of her husband’s extended family. Smh.

      • L84Tea says:

        Well if that was the case her actions prove otherwise. Diana had her issues, but she was a workhorse when it came to charities (shopping and looking great was merely a perk of it all while those alone seem to be Kate’s career these days).

      • L84Tea says:

        My comment above was in response to Kitty.

      • Kitty says:

        @L84Tea, even with clothes Diana did it better and the luxury life as well.

      • L84Tea says:

        @Kitty, Oh I agree 100%. Like I said, Diana had her issues, but that woman worked in addition to enjoying living well and looking good. Kate hasn’t managed to pull off both yet.

      • Kitty says:

        I agree @L84Tea. Honestly Kate is a disappointment. But I fear that the monarchy will not last long after The Queen passes. William doesn’t want to be King and Charles not as popular!

      • msthang says:

        A whole lot of couples don’t put much thought into the long term part of a relationship as much as “the wedding”, “the wedding,” and oh how beautiful I will look and first signs of trouble they want to bolt, one has to wander what goes on behind the scenes, Chopper has got to be Hell to live with!!!

    • Adele Dazeem says:

      I think she idealized what being the DOC would be. And as hard as the press seemed to be on Diana back in the day, it was still NOTHING compared to what public figures face today–with social media, camera phones, message boards, everyone putting their opinions out there, etc.

      I suspect some of her laziness is her social anxiety and insecurity at doing her work. She’s obviously not a natural in a social setting, and being under the microscope when you aren’t in your wheelhouse is extra challenging.

      • notasugarhere says:

        How does that explain her laziness for the 10 years before the engagement? Post-university, she never “worked” more than 2-3 days a week for 9 months.

      • Adele Dazeem says:

        Well, as I said, it’s SOME of her laziness; not all lol.

    • Sharon Lea says:

      I wonder what she thought it would be too. Maybe it tied into her competitiveness. Reading Katie Nichol’s book on her, all I really gathered about her personality is that loves sports, all types, on the field, board games etc. William was a goal. She got to go after that goal for years. But what goal does she have now? Is that why she looks dull in the eyes? She is pretty, but the light isn’t there.

  26. TheOtherOne says:

    I think the Doolittles will get divorced. He will throw her under the bus to save himself and George (because I feel like Charlotte is an after thought for him). Timeframe: the next 5-7 years; making them 40-42.

    Before you say Carole will never let that happen, Will only has to make a call to Charles and Charles will welcome him home like the Prodigal Son that he is. Plus, Charles’ hate for Carole suppresses anything he may feel against Wills.

    • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

      When they got engaged almost everyone said it would end in tears – at the time I gave them 10 years. His parents marriage lasted 15 but I somehow don’t think theirs will go that far.

      The only way that the marriage might last is if they walk away from the line of succession – something that I think might make them both happier. But Carole would never let that happen – Kate is living her dream.

    • Kitty says:

      Damn when Charles is King the Middletons are going to be an afterthought.

    • notasugarhere says:

      I feel like Diana’s Granddaughter is the one he worries about more, not their son. They’ve pressured many more people about suppressing or removing photos of CC than PGTips. Look at the difference in baptisms to see which child was paraded in public.

      Betti, I don’t think this marriage can survive without Carole constantly putting it back together and playing mediator. If he married KM for her family, and he took himself and the kids out of the line? He loses Carole.

    • Apples says:

      They will never divorce. I’m absolutely sure of it. Kate will let anything to drag on forever because she has no will and no other life / interests besides being Cambridge. He is too lazy to start trouble and lose his position.
      They will never divorce.

      • Anitas says:

        I agree, Apples. I don’t see them ever divorcing. Kate is the enabler and William likes having someone who’ll never call him out on anything. Plus the kids.

      • Sharon Lea says:

        I agree. Dickie Arbiter told Larry King the week they were marrying, ‘she knows what she is marrying,’ with a nod to the expected infidelities. If she went along with it silently all through her 20s, they have their agreement.

      • Nic919 says:

        I think they will divorce because their laziness will make them so unpopular that it will be easier for Will to dump her. Even now she is always more targeted as the lazy one even though Will is just as bad.

        Kate will never seek a divorce, but William will.

      • L84Tea says:

        I agree. I don’t see them ever divorcing.

  27. Apples says:

    It’s not even that he doesn’t have his mother’s instinct for press&America, Diana actually WORKED a lot. No one ever called his mother lazy a$$. Will &Kate now practically go by that name.

  28. Radley says:

    Aren’t these two passionate about anything? Is there anything they WANT to be involved in? Seems like such an empty existence. People need to have something worthwhile to do in their lives. Idle hands and all. And since raising kids is not a full time job for these two in particular, that doesn’t count. It seems like they take advantage of all they help they have, so they aren’t passionate about raising kids either.

    • Guesto says:

      I think they’re utterly passionless and that’s at the heart of why they’re both so grimly unengaging.

      Passion is a driver. The reason Harry gets such a different press from these two is because he has it in spades.

  29. Sage says:

    Same complaint different day. Nothing will change.

  30. weegiewarrior says:

    They r making a terrible mistake with their treatment of th press – th only institution left which shows any deference to the BRF- th truth of th matter is the press equals the people – it is how we find out what the royal family are or arent doing. They cant take their existence for granted. I never thought id see a man like Donald trump become president anything could happen – britain without a royal family is a possibility when TQ passes

    • Kitty says:

      Honestly I think all bets are off once The Queen passes.

    • Joannie says:

      The press dislike them because they keep them at arm’s length. W&K give them very little info as they should considering what happened to Diana. As well there could be threats against them and their children. Look up the iman who rants and spews hate against the British soldiers and western culture all the while receiving benefits thanks to the British taxpayer. Theyre good for charity and give us a sense of security and stability. Strength in numbers! Kate has a very strong sense of family values and William gives his salary to charity. He does work his shift despite it not being reported in the papers every single day he’s there! That’s more than his father did at his age or Harry ever does. I know what the response to this will be so save yourself the trouble.

      • CrystalBall says:

        Someone has beeen enjoying the royal kool-aid. And this was no trouble, no trouble at all. I’m sure longer comments are more work though.

      • Tina says:

        We don’t respond because we’re trying to convince you, Joannie. We respond to set the record straight for those reading. And on that record, Charles worked much harder than William does at the same age. He has always done lots of engagements. He set up the Prince’s Trust, which is essentially his life’s work. He was an environmentalist when people who believed in that sort of thing were thought to be nutters. Harry was a serving soldier who did two tours of duty, and his work with the Invictus Games is more significant than William has ever done.

      • Deedee says:

        Good morning, Carole M.! Nice to see you here.

  31. Janet Arthur says:

    Everyone has an opinion and sees what they want to. If you were living in a gold fish bowl I’m sure your understanding would be greater on how Royal lives are lived. I think peoplease who are cranky about other people’s lives haven’t got enough positivity in their own.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Go ahead and pity them for their public, one percenter’s life off the backs of the taxpayers. What does that have to do with them refusing to work even half as much as the 7+ pensioners who are carrying the heavy load for the family firm?

  32. Kaz says:

    I think they just want to be left to lead their preferred life as rich and privileged young toffs. Not overley interested in the rest of the world or other people or anything in particular. Do they have any interests? Oh – I know – Kate likes Tennis and Ben Ainsley. William likes?

  33. Apples says:

    I don’t know – I keep hearing how popular they are in the UK from anyone who lives or had just came from there. I think they actually don’t give a f because the brits like them.

  34. Indiana Joanna says:

    Mummy Carole for sure.

    W&KM are and will forever be only self interested. They show no intelligent signs of life that acknowledge it is the British taxpayers who fund their unimaginable lifestyle. Both W&KM are infantile to the extreme with Carole cleaning up their messes and spoon feeding them so they can wake up another day. Celebitchy has been correct for the past three years that the two of them are infantile, contemptuous of the people who pay their way and rather unpleasant morons. No amount of mud baths and botox can cover up this fact.

  35. LA Elle (formerly Elle R.) says:

    I really don’t understand not having Eugenie and Beatrice as working royals. They’re born princesses, and despite their parents, they seem relatively level headed. They also seem more eager to work than Will and Kate.

    That Charles can’t be enough of an adult to not blame them for who their parents are is ridiculous, but I also don’t understand his streamlined monarchy plan. Even if Kate and Will were pulling full loads, he’s expecting them to carry a lot. That they do so very little – and seem to view it as their right to do the bare minimum – only makes his plans that much more unworkable.

    • notasugarhere says:

      LA Elle, I think Beatrice would be fine being a working royal (she’d do a fine job and she’d be willing to do it). I think Eugenie would prefer not to be one.

      Beatrice will likely end up as a Counselor of State, which puts limits on where she can live and what she can do. CoS is the monarch’s spouse and the next 4 heirs 21+ years old.

      Current Counselors: Philip, Charles, William, Harry, Andrew.

      If Charles becomes king before PGTips is 21, Beatrice becomes a Counselor of State. Camilla, William, Harry, Andrew, Beatrice. If Andrew passes before PGTips is 21, Eugenie is added to the list. I’m sure Charles would love to remove Andrew from that list, but I don’t know if he’s legally allowed to.

      It would make sense to have Beatrice as a working royal for the next 15 years, then she could “retire” when W&K’s kids come of age. By then, her obligation as Counselor of State would be gone.

  36. carolind says:

    Beatrice and Eugenie strike me as a couple of airheads and if they are born princesses then so is the seeming much nicer Lady Louise Windsor. I know somebody who spent a weekend with most of the BRF at Balmoral last summer. She praised most but did not like Andrew or daughters.

    Even when Charles becomes king, there will still be Camilla, Andrew, Anne, Edward, Sophie, William, Kate, Harry and maybe wife and Gloucesters maybe still floating around too. Enough!

  37. Starlight says:

    I read an old article that Diana styled her dress code on being a working mother. As there is an exhibition on Diana’s style at KP it was probably related to that. Diana was a working mother and she had passion in her charitable events. I don’t see that in these two they seem to go through the motions. I don’t think William likes the public glare but he loves the trimmings, he actually does seem very similar to his great great uncle Prince Edward. Wills and Kate seemed to have morphed into the “ghost family” you don’t see the family very often but when you do your surprised. I suppose they will be off skiing soon and it will be interesting to see if you get the few official photos like last year. I think that is where the press get cross they feel public scrutiny through their photographs goes with the job of royalty. Looking forward to Harry getting hitched things could get very interesting then.

  38. Laura says:

    Diana will forever be remembered for her work…I can clearly recall her efforts to de-stigmatize AIDS and leprosy, bring attention to homeless people, and end landmines. I couldn’t tell you what she was wearing when she promoted these issues, but I can tell you that the attention she brought to these causes has never left me. THAT is what the monarchy should be about – bringing long term attention to worthy causes…not parading around in expensive clothing and bitching about how “hard” one’s overly privileged life is.