Duchess Kate in a Wickstead coatdress in Luxembourg: lovely or tedious?

Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge arriving at the Grand Duke Jean Museum of Modern Art (MUDAM) in Luxembourg on the first of her five engagements for the official commemoration of the 1867 Treaty of London

I forgot this was happening, but here we go. The Duchess of Cambridge made a solo trip to Luxembourg today to help mark the 150th anniversary of the country’s independence. As we keep hearing, Kate and William are being billed – or perhaps they are billing themselves – as Britain’s new “Brexit ambassadors.” Britain is trying to cozy up to its European allies in the wake of Brexit, because many trade deals need to be renegotiated and more. It’s not like Kate and William are actually negotiating anything, by the way. They are soft-power diplomats, going into countries and doing happy, friendly photo-ops and trying to remind allies of their historic connections to Britain.

All of which means that Kate will actually be expected to A) do her part and B) actually travel solo. Kate is very much the heroine in her own Jane Austen novel, so she tends to avoid traveling alone, lest word of her ruination get back to London. By “alone,” I do mean “without William or some other royal,” by the way. Kate was totally traveling with staff, and probably some British diplomats and government handlers.

For the day’s activities, Kate wore a pale blue coatdress by Emilia Wickstead, one of her favorite British designers. I like this coatdress in a general sense, in that it’s flattering, a nice color and the heaviness of the fabric means that the skirt is unlikely to give us a Marilyn Moment should a gust of wind chance by. But I also feel like Kate has a million coatdresses that look just like this? You can read more about “Princess Kate” and her trip to Luxembourg here at People.

Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge arriving at the Grand Duke Jean Museum of Modern Art (MUDAM) in Luxembourg on the first of her five engagements for the official commemoration of the 1867 Treaty of London

Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge arriving at the Grand Duke Jean Museum of Modern Art (MUDAM) in Luxembourg on the first of her five engagements for the official commemoration of the 1867 Treaty of London

Photos courtesy of Pacific Coast News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

121 Responses to “Duchess Kate in a Wickstead coatdress in Luxembourg: lovely or tedious?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Indira says:

    Is she pregnant or did she have another round of filler injections/Botox?

    • Erica says:

      I have been wondering the same thing.One minute her face is all puffy and wrinkle free then next time it’s gaunt .I think she is messing with her face a little to much,she doesn’t want to end up looking like that lion lady .Also Pippa looks like she has had some work done to her face too.If Kate is pregnant we will see at the party at the palace but I don’t think she is.

      • Paris says:

        Or Pippa finally decided to hire professional makeup artist.
        Sisters was famous for their awful heavy eye makeup.

      • loveotterly says:

        Maybe these are retouched photos? I’m not sure who released them…

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        I think its a mix of fillers/botox, new makeup look, that natural light and photoshop.

      • Zaratustra says:

        Her upper lip did get a little bit fuller. She used to have an upper lip that vanished when she smiled. Not it is still there.

    • my3cents says:

      The wiglets is definitely back. That wiglet works harder than her!

    • Rose says:

      I’m so tired of the wiglets, and that look. She’s touching her hair and looking up like a shy 15 year old. Good god woman. You are 35. Stand up straight and get your fingers out of your hair. Conduct your self like an adult, not a flirty adolescent. She isn’t going to like it when Meghan shows her how it’s done.

      • Jan says:

        Just what I was thinking. Physicially she 35 going on 60 and in mentally, she’s 35 going on 15. WTH!

      • Margaret says:

        I share your sentiments. She needs to grow up and start dressing and acting like a mature professional and not some flirty teenage girl. She is a future queen consort, for goodness sake! She needs to start practising gravitas. I doubt she will ever actually acquire it, but she needs to start learning how to pretend she has it. She will not compare favourably to Meghan.

  2. Sarah says:

    It’s a joke that they send people like her as “Brexit ambassadors”. No politician cares what Kate or Wills have to say and I don’t even think these two care about Brexit and its consequences. It’s just another trip (that has no influence whatsoever) to justify their existence.

    • Karen says:

      When other royals tour for trade reasons they usually visit companies/factories for the purpose of raising awareness of the trade relations. Not policy talk but a simple tour with pictures of them pointing at the goods. Publicity.

      Not these two. Visit museums and eat fancy dinners. Obviously this is the best tact for keeping trade relations tight.

      • Zaratustra says:

        Both Royals and politicians usually have a large entourage consisting of political and economic advisors and political and economic lobbyists and businessmen who are keen on doing business in the country they visit.

        Kate hasn’t brought anybody like that.

        Don’t be fooled. Neither Kate nor William are Brexit ambassadors. They aren’t taken seriously else they would have been invited by EU political institutions or by EU politicians. Matter of fact is that they haven’t even been invited by the politicians of the EU countries.

        As for the “quiet diplomacy” of the Royal Family. You shouldn’t believe in it as there is no evidence of that. Every nation has institutions who invite guests. In Germany the Federal President (the nominal head of state who has barely any say) does usually invite state guests into his residence Schloss Bellevue (Bellevue Palace).
        None of such institutions did invite Kate and William so far. And that does tell you that they aren’t important.
        Btw. The current German Federal President J. Gauck did invite the Queen once. She was given a painting of her riding a pony as a child. She apparently didn’t like it very much but she was polite.

        See here:

        https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRaUgxTPwVSGHXXb9UrPPGOuL0xZUtA3Fqa9jBPlnLAGtMP5YcZ7Q

        Or see here:
        http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/queen-perplexed-by-painting-from-german-president-is-that-supposed-to-be-my-father-10342064.html

    • hmmm says:

      Another fluffy freebie holitour.

    • addie says:

      Exactly. She’s useless. Just ‘make work’ exercises to justify her existence.

  3. MunichGirl says:

    I like the red dress.

    • Deedee says:

      Yes, I want that red dress!

    • notasugarhere says:

      I think it needs fewer ruffles. If you’re going to have the giant front ruffle, delete the ruffle hem and sleeves. Or get rid of the giant ruffle and only have the sleeve and hem ruffles. Less is better with ruffles. Beatrice wore a great pale pink dress a few years ago, Roksanda Ilincic. Simple neckline and silhouette with a pop of purple in the ruffled cuffs.

    • Maria says:

      Love the dress, and the colour. I love Princess Stephanie, she always looks so natural.

    • thaisajs says:

      Right? Kate once again pulls out the oatmeal-colored pumps for another truly dull outfit while the lady in red brought it. I’m not wild about the sleeves of her dress but I love the color.

  4. Idky says:

    Kate’s skin looks great in these pics! Her face also looks a lot fuller as well. I wish she would wear less coatdresses with the flared out hems and wear more form fitting dresses. Either that or try more bold colors and patterns.

    • FLORC says:

      It’s photo edits. And if a person has what some consider bad skin or not it doesn’t matter. Their actions do. But, that is was mentioned I mentioned this.

      Sun damage. Pox marks. wrinkles. They getvsmoothed out, but rarely ever go away.

      • Soothie says:

        Funny, her skin looks the same (ie: good) on every single website. Did all the separate photo agencies edit her skin the exact same way? How do you reckon they coordinate that?

      • FLORC says:

        I’ll call on lak to better explain with links. For some reason my phone gets testy adding links and lags while typing on this site. Only this site. Can that be looked into?

        Anywho, we’ve seen 2 versions of Kate. Photoshop and less so. All photos get touched up. Better the photo better the relationship. And random people posting photos.

        Mayne most notably the red coat photo showing jowls bags, grays, and wrinkles. Her portrait getting slammed because it didn’t look like her press shots. Even though it did look like her photographs taken for the portrait. And a few times her makeup has been toned down. Photos show it subtle. Video is less kind. This isn’t just to late. William’s teeth get bleached.

      • notasugarhere says:

        soothie, when all the sites purchase their photos from the same photo agency, they all get the same photoshopped pictures. As FLORC alluded to, and LAK can back up, the press go through stages where they hyper-photoshop her and when they retouch nothing. The difference is astounding. Early on, Chatelaine (Canada) photoshopped a cover picture so much they changed the shade of her lipstick, the shape of her lips, removed hair flying in her face, and even gave her eyes a blue cast.

      • FLORC says:

        Nota
        Thank you! And i remember those photos. The changes were drastic.

        It’s not even to pin on Kate. This is common practice those photos are edited heavily and often.
        I have nothing against wrinkles, blemishes, or pox scars. At all. And it’s silly imo to believe press and magazine photos are true to life.

      • Soothie says:

        Hahahaha. Nope. You guys don’t understand photo agencies at all or the industry at all. I worked at one and have worked as a photo editor at a major tabloid too. The passage from agency to publication is pretty much instantaneous. There is no way you could photoshop 500+ pictures within 3 minutes from being taken that it lands on the photo editors desk. And also, how do you explain DIFFERENT photo agencies having the same “retouched” shots. Do they collude? Now what get published in print is a different matter. They might be photoshopped (especially in print), but again, how do you explain photos from different agencies looking exactly the same?

        I know you guys hate Kate but let’s get real. What you are saying makes no sense and you have no practical knowledge of how these things work.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Hate and criticism are not the same thing, and generally only her SuperFans are the ones coming on here conflating the two.

        6 years of this, we’re too far in with to much evidence to pretend she has milk white skin and a perfect complexion. They regularly photoshop everything from her wrinkles to her jowls to her eye and hair shade. If you’d been on here longer than a day, you’d have seen the mountains of evidence shown through the pictures shared on here for the last 6 years.

        What always amazes me is that her fans are the ones most “on board” with the photoshopping. Most kate fan blogs never show an unphotoshopped picture. They’re the ones who won’t allow her to be human.

    • Sarah says:

      Agree. I like the top of the coatdress, but that bottom!! Wider, kind of flouncy, so girly!! She is 36.
      If I were dressing Kate, the rules would be: straight hems almost to her knee, straight because they don’t fly up, plus they look really good on her. Hair back, at least the sides pulled back, because she looks much more polished and actually much prettier like that. A blazer or jacket over the dress or skirt, which can be fun, as she could play with colors and patterns, etc.
      And burn the nude shoes. Get some fun shoes with patterns, florals. Oh, and NO JEGGINGS!! Sorry, royal camel-toe is still gross. Nicely tailored slacks or jeans.
      Royal doesn’t have to be a snooze – she can play a bit.
      She doesn’t play because she doesn’t care. Or she is just really, really boring. Sad.

  5. IMO says:

    Who does her makeup? She fell into a rouge box again.

  6. eXo says:

    She looks pregnant. Jmo

    • Lucy says:

      +1 Pregnancy announcement coming soon I think. It’s the perfect plan wait for Harry to announce the engagement then steal all the thunder by announcing a pregnancy!!

      • Deedee says:

        I really don’t think another pregnancy would eclipse a Harry engagement.

      • amalia says:

        As far as I know people were only excited when she announced her first pregnancy. The second pregnancy was more like “oh she’s pregnant again? cool.”.

      • Cookiejar says:

        Yea, the “press” prefers wedding announcements to spares. Should it be the first, then yea, it would be a big deal, but if a 3rd ever comes, it will be spare to the spare, now that they removed male preference.

  7. Wren33 says:

    I think it looks very nice. I am someone who runs hot and claustrophobic, so the idea of coat dresses makes my skin crawl.

  8. AfricanBoy says:

    70/80s soap opera hairstyle.

  9. alfaQ says:

    Royals are a waste of space and taxpayer money.

  10. Talie says:

    I’m surprised there are no photo-ops with Guillaume and his wife.

    • notasugarhere says:

      His wife (in the ugly red dress) is the one walking with her in the third photo. But hey, two of the laziest married-in royal spouses actually showed up to work on the same day.

      • Talie says:

        Oh wow…I didn’t recognize her! Do they get shade about working too?! I didn’t know that! How funny…

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        I didn’t realise that she get stick for not working hard but I don’t follow them.

        Doesn’t Mette Marit in Norway have a rep for being just like Waity? Was reading the royal blogs and she doesn’t have a good working rep, seems to prefer hanging out with the fashion types in NYC, not to mention the alleged affair she was supposed to have had a few years ago. How can anyone cheat on my baby Haakon 🙁

      • L84Tea says:

        Can someone point me in the direction of these royal blogs?? I read a couple fashion-y royal blogs, but I would much prefer one with a little more juice to it.

    • Maria says:

      And Princess Mary gets flak for spending too much money on clothes.
      But at least she looks good, compared to Kate who just doesn’t seem to get it. I think with the red ruffle dress that Stephanie wore with her hair back she would have looked great.

  11. doglover says:

    Kate and her “clown-cheeks”.

    I like the coat, that’s it.

  12. Odell says:

    Imo, she would look better with a Queen-Letizia-haircut.

  13. JustME says:

    Is there a British royal who cares about this whole Brexit thing? I mean, it won’t affect them at all…

    • Tina says:

      It will affect them if Scotland leaves. It would be very interesting from a constitutional perspective if Scotland kept the monarchy.

  14. bread says:

    It’s a nice colour and cut (for once, her waist isn’t hiked up under her bust to extend the appearance of her legs) but it looks a little warm and heavy for a May appearance.

  15. BearcatLawyer says:

    I love Luxembourg. It is a gorgeous little jewel of a country. I wish someone would appoint me Brexit ambassador so I could travel around Europe while wearing nice clothes, meeting interesting people, and seeing national treasures.

    • spidey says:

      So does Amazon.com. 🙂

      • Luxie says:

        So does a whole lot of companies and banks. 😀
        Weatherwise it’s been quite chilly here in Luxembourg. It was warmer today, but still quite windy. It definitely did not feel like +20.

  16. Mikasa says:

    It’s a nice coat but in the end it’s just another boring outfit worn by Dolittle and I also try to ignore her favorite boring nude heels from now on.

  17. Minxx says:

    She looks nice, even her hair looks better than usual. The coatdress is lovely though I’d make the skirt a bit less voluminous but the color is great on her.

  18. Adele Dazeem says:

    She really does buy/wear the same things over and over again doesn’t she? She looks nice and as previous posters said, everything fits, good tailoring, appropriate etc but haven’t we seen her in a pale blue dress coat multiple times? Is this new or a recycle?

  19. Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

    I don’t mind the coat dress, the colour is nice but its those bloody beige shoes – I hate those LK Bennet things with a passion.

    I prefer the Heredity Grand Duchess’s outfit. I love the red dress and the shoes are OK with it, tho she would have gotten away with black or a darker red.

  20. Lainey says:

    Emilia Wickstead isn’t British she’s from New Zealand. And she has this exact coatdress in three different colours now. Green that she wore on Paddy’s Day, yellow/gold that she wore in Bhutan and to the Order of the Thistle and now today’s blue. She must be roasting. its over 20C there today and shes in a thick woolen coat. Brand new Kiki’s too. So that’s probably more than £5000 there. The crowds outside are laughable. Most places are empty and those that have people aren’t even one person deep. There’s more in Ireland for Charles and Camilla than for Kate.

    • sarri says:

      The crowds for the royals seem to have decreased over the last few years. Only the Queen draws big crowds.

      • Kitty says:

        Sarri I agree. I would think the “popular” younger royals would draw in the biggest crowds.

  21. Deedee says:

    If you already have a score of light blue coatdresses in your closet, why not splurge on another? If you check the Daily Mail pics, you’ll see the terrible tailoring on the belt at the back, and while you’re there, note how her wiglets are not blending well to the rest of her hair at the back of her head. The styling is a yawn.

    • Mikasa says:

      You’re right about her hair/wiglets. I didn’t notice it before I read your comment.

      • Soothie says:

        Nope can’t see the wig. Because she doesn’t have one, sorry

      • Mikasa says:

        Sorry Carole/Soothie but it’s known that Kate loves her wiglets.

      • Deedee says:

        Yes, that’s just her “natural” hair that separates itself from the rest, helicopters out when the wind blows it, creates that weird bump at the back of her head and photographs like it has a different texture. Everybody’s hair gets magically thicker like that in their 30s and it changes spontaneously between engagements. Nothing to see here. Nothing at all.

  22. Green Is Good says:

    Willnot and Kannot actually doing something? Shocking.

  23. Lisa says:

    OMG! Did she cut her hair? It looks a little better. Too bad it’s another coatdress (with the waist hiked up to her boobs) with nude heels and clown makeup….Jeez! She’s so forgettable, just blah. And for this dud and her family, the Brits are paying millions of pounds a year in support. I’d ask for my money back. SMH

    • I can’t understand why any belt she wears is always higher in the front above her waist. That can’t even be comfortable to wear it like that. It does look like she’s sporting a baby bump.

  24. Lara says:

    Did anyone watch King Charles III last night on the BBC? Based on a play by the same name. Very good and with Kate as the villain (I guess). Would def recommend!

  25. hmmm says:

    One. More. Coatdress. :scream:

  26. Jessica says:

    She looks great! I love the dress.

  27. lobbit says:

    Nice coat. That’s all I got.

  28. L says:

    I think she looks pregnant, too. Her arms are fuller…

    • hmmm says:

      If she’s preggers, where is her HG? Or is she waiting till after her sister’s wedding?

      • Soothie says:

        Apparently you can experience different symptoms for different pregnancies! Not every pregnancy is the same!! Imagine that!!

      • FLORC says:

        Her morning sickness never appeared outside of the late 1st to early 2nd trimesters. Never being severe enough to keep her from long plane rides, sli trips, shopping on her feet for hours or gaining a healthy amount of weight.

        I also doubt she’s pregnant. Her hair isn’t showing grays. I’m betting she’s gone for her beauty maintenance recently.

      • nic919 says:

        Assuming William even wants a third child, she is not going to get pregnant before Pippa’s wedding. She was extremely thin last week so it’s the coat and the fillers that are making people speculate this.

  29. The Original Mia says:

    She has the same coatdress in green. She wore it to meet the Irish Guards. Waste of money to look so plain. Doesn’t appear she has the wiglets it, but I didn’t look too carefully.

  30. Nina says:

    God, I want someone to give her a grown up haircut.

  31. Va Va Kaboom says:

    I wonder what W&K becoming “Brexit Ambassadors ” will mean for Edward and Sophie. They have been the Royals tasked with maintaining relationships with the Continental Royal Families for years and have performed their job well. I guess W&K are considered more high profile though?

    • Kitty says:

      Sorry but Diana if alive would be the best Brexit ambassador and actually made a difference.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Va Va, to me they are different things. Sophie and Edward are invited to things that, while they might count as “official engagements”, are actually celebrations with friends and family. Social events that maintain ties between royal families, and oh yeah, countries too we’re supposed to think.

      I see these KM Brexit Lite things as drop in, pose with a royal, look at a picture, go home. Presumably she’s supposed to be promoting UK business ties with individual European countries, but cannot see how what she’s done achieves that.

      • Va Va Kaboom says:

        That makes sense. I just wondered if W&K will be expected to take over the celebratory events in these countries as well, since that helps build positive PR within these countries. However that would mean more trips, presumably without their kids, so perhaps E&S will continue on with these events and W&K will focus on the non-Tiara events.

      • Did I read somewhere that this trip included a speech by Kate? I’d love to hear it!

  32. JaneDoesWork says:

    Her hair looks WAY better. It looks like she had a cut, a color, and a slight restyling. Its more professional looking, while still keeping the length she likes.

  33. Amelie says:

    This seems to be the light blue version of the green coatdress she wore at that St. Patrick’s event a few years in a row, right?

    • Adele Dazeem says:

      I think it’s the light blue version 5467 of the coat dresses she wears at every event w her trademark nude heels. Come on Kate, spice it up a little

  34. Chetta B. says:

    Lovely!

  35. Becks says:

    I think she looks nice, even if its a boring outfit that we’ve seen from her time and time again. I think this coat is better for traveling than the powder blue suit she wore to the Netherlands last year.

  36. Tough Cookie says:

    I hate that she plays with her hair and then shakes hands. Yuck. I hope everyone who has to meet her carries a little bottle of hand sanitizer.

  37. Penelope says:

    I like the coatdress on her.

  38. Keri says:

    Stupid but genuine question here. How does a coat dress work? What do you wear under it, another outfit? Or do you not take it off?!

    • FLORC says:

      The coat looks like a dress. Often there will be a dress slightly shorter in the hem that compliments or matches the coat.
      In her pregnancy with George she did a visit with bear grills. Pics look like she took a coat dress and made it a dress.
      It’s not meant to be worn as a dress.

      • notasugarhere says:

        She did that with a suit jacket in NYC as well. She had someone add 6 inches on the bottom of it and then wore it buttoned as a mini dress. It showed the cobbled-together seam and added length, so it wasn’t done custom by the designer. She may have purchased the matching trousers, then had them hacked apart and added to the bottom of the jacket.

  39. HoustonGrl says:

    Doesn’t she have a hundred coats in this color?

    • HappyMom says:

      Yes-so dull. And what a waste of money! And those same boring shoes. Whenever I see her described as a style icon my eyes roll. She looks fine. That’s all I’ve got.

  40. KatM says:

    I have nothing against her clothes usually but I will say this…she dresses sometimes like she is about twenty years older than she is. I like simple and refined….but for some reason she always looks much older than she is. Sorry if that sounds horrible.

    • HappyMom says:

      Yes-I agree. On gofugyourself I suggested that she follow some of the other European royal’s and their great style. And I got the “oh they’re so much older than she is.” Um, hello, half the time she dresses like a 50 year old. Why not a 50 year old with great style?

  41. Joannie says:

    I think the color is really pretty on her. I think she’s had a bit of botox or filler around her eyes. They look somewhat different. Her makeup has changed so perhaps thats all it is. She looks great!

  42. Jessica says:

    This is interesting. My cousin is there and stumbled upon her palace exit and took the best photo of her that I’ve see in years. Just posted it on FB. He also is a retired pro photographer.

  43. ABC says:

    Can she manage any expressions other than ‘maniacal child eating grin’ or ‘aw shucks aren’t I the cutest darn thing?’. How about professional, polite, restrained, grown-up(!) etc? Not everything is laugh out loud hilarious and not everyone finds you cute. Some of us would like our senior royals to just do their blinkin’ jobs without the faux ridiculousness or expense thanks. Another new coat? Seriously??

  44. A says:

    The coat is bespoke, which explains why it fits better than the rest of her clothes. It’s especially noticeable when she stands beside Stephanie, whose red number has a poor fit and is way too loose for her. I do wish she’d pay more attention to the details because it looks very sloppy here, in comparison to the cleaner lines on Emilia Wickstead’s dress.

    • Zaratustra says:

      I like the red dress more, actually. It looks so much more lively and modern and grown-up. Whereas Kate looks like a washed out over-dolled Belle/Cinderella minus a few inches in the skirt.

      • Polly says:

        I find the red dress dowdy and cheap looking. It belongs on a much older woman not a 33 year old. And the brown suede shoes are horrible.

  45. Skeets says:

    Beyond bored with the coat-dress. No one wears coat dresses – other than royals. Such a tired look. So bored.

  46. Egla says:

    I wonder has anyone counted how many pale blue coat-dresses does she have? 10, 12, more? ? ?

  47. Disco Dancer says:

    It’s a pretty coloured
    Coat and the design is nice. She looks nice and elegant but safe and boring. At least no danger of flashing with this heavy outfit. And I notice from her pictures that she’s reserved and talking to people doesn’t come to her naturally. Hence the big grins that she has.

  48. spidey says:

    Her outfit looks better than the lady’s with her – red dress,odd tanny coloured suede shoes and a black clutch bag?

  49. Greta says:

    When I first saw the pictures I thought the dress was a repeat from her visit to the Netherlands. Same color. http://celebritiesreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/kate-middleton-visits-netherlands.jpg

  50. Ravine says:

    Fun fact: this item was inspired by the tale of Periwinklio, the terrycloth bathrobe that wished upon a star to become a real coat.

  51. seesittellsit says:

    It’s a lovely color, fits well, and is appropriate to the occasion. She looks very nice. Memorable, no, but she’s not a memorable type. But it is the right thing for the right occasion. Nice color for spring, too.

    • notasugarhere says:

      And the reason why she had to purchase her 71st coat dress is? She already has multiple coat dresses, including pale blue; there was no need for a brand new outfit for this event.

  52. Dee says:

    Whether we like it or not she’s a HRH and all the crap that involves. She has to dress appropriate. The average middle aged Brit is pretty judgmental and so it seems most of the rest of the English speaking world – I’m an Australian. It’s a hard wardrobe to fill. All considered I think she gets it! Her face – her issue. Silly IMO to play this game – can never be who you were and far more interesting see how we turn out to be!