Martin Freeman doesn’t think there will be any more ‘Sherlock’: It’s ‘not fun anymore’

'Sherlock' filming

Remember how obsessed we were for Sherlock Season 3? The wait was endless – Benedict Cumberbatch’s Sherlock Holmes seemed to jump off a building and die, only to be resurrected in shadows at his own gravesite. We had to wait years to for season 3, and then when it arrived, it was just sort of… eh. For my money, the first two seasons of Sherlock are still impeccable, which makes it even more noticeable that the third and fourth seasons were poorly written hogwash. I mean, the “Sherlock has a secret sister who killed his dog, only the dog was really a small child storyline still makes me really angry. Anyway, Martin “Dr. Watson” Freeman told the Telegraph that there are no big plans to return to do a fifth season. Good.

Hopes of a fifth season of the beloved BBC show are fading by the day, especially as both of its stars now have Marvel contracts to uphold (Cumberbatch will be reprising his Doctor Strange for Avengers: Infinity War, and Freeman’s Agent Everett Ross from Black Panther may well return in a future film). According to Freeman, part of the long post-Season 4 delay was due to viewers’ expectations running wild.

“Um . . . I think after Series 4 [it] felt like a pause. I think we felt we’d done it for a bit now,” Freeman explained in a new interview with The Telegraph. “And part of it, speaking for myself, is [due to] the reception of it.”

Sherlock’s fourth season was far from its most beloved, but Freeman’s issue wasn’t with the critics’ more negative response, but with the fans themselves, who, in their devotion to the show and its stars, at times caused more stress than anything else. “Being in that show, it is a mini Beatles thing,” Freeman said. “People’s expectations, some of it’s not fun anymore. It’s not a thing to be enjoyed, it’s a thing of: ‘You better f—— do this, otherwise you’re a c—.’ That’s not fun anymore.”

Above all, Freeman said, it was about going too big too fast. The popularity of Sherlock’s first season spanned an entire ocean at lightning speed, and keeping that kind of quality up while also keeping fans entertained and happy while also doing it in three 90-minute episodes that only arrived every few years was an impossible task. “Whereas even with The Office [Freeman’s big break] it was a slow burn,” he admitted. “But Sherlock was frankly notably high-quality from the outset. And when you start [that high] it’s pretty hard to maintain that.”

[From Vanity Fair]

I understand his complaints about the fan obsession and the weirdness around the cult of Sherlock. That being said, the answer was NOT to deliver two awful, tepid, poorly written seasons to counter that. It was almost as if – and hear me out – Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat were TRYING to alienate viewers while also giving them really f–ked up “fan service.” Instead of Moffat and Gatiss just keeping their heads down and delivering the same quality from the first two seasons, they were just throwing sh-t at the wall and reading too many Sherlock-Watson ship-blogs.

Here are photos of Martin at the Empire Awards over the weekend:

The Empire Film Awards

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

25 Responses to “Martin Freeman doesn’t think there will be any more ‘Sherlock’: It’s ‘not fun anymore’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Argonaut says:

    martin freeman is a twat! remember when he was asking that guy about his ramones shirt on tv? that was embarrassing to watch.

    • Lyka says:

      Thank you. This dude is not cute.

      Also recall his date rape joke from The Hobbit press tour. I see you, Freeman.

    • Penfold says:

      What happened? Was he trying to embarrass the guy wearing the shirt?

  2. pia says:

    Stopped watching after season 2…the creators get too much credit for such mediocre work.

  3. Krill says:

    Sorry, this was never a good show. People just got carried away with the fandom. See also Downton Abbey.

  4. Lori says:

    The last season just didnt make much sense. It wasnt quality writing. The new woman was a great actress and did a great job, but was surrounded by so much implausibility.

    I’d say it would be a real shame if that was how they left the story of Sherlock, on a huge failure, when the previous seasons were SO GOOD.

  5. Mia4s says:

    I didn’t think there would be another series? Both of their careers are thriving (also Gatiss and Moffat are busy) and they can make a lot more money elsewhere. Come back for a reunion in 15 years. I’d watch.

  6. Renee2 says:

    To me, it’s funny that there is a photo of him at the empire awards when his character is called “colonizer” in Black Panther.

  7. knotslaning says:

    I adore Freeman. He has been my favorite actor in many things; Fargo, The Hobbit, Sherlock, the Office, Hitchhiker’s Guide, Hot Fuzz, Shaun of the Dead, The World’s End. I’m glad he’s moving on from Sherlock because I’m enjoying the other work he’s doing. Good for him.

  8. Digital Unicorn says:

    I stopped watching Sherlock after season 2 – the quality of the writing went right down and you could tell that the cast were over it because of the crazy fandom that surrounded the show.

    Moffat did the same thing with Dr Who – started off well but quickly went down hill when it got successful.

    He is a great actor – I have seen him in the theatre.

    • Una says:

      Moffat panders to Tumblr. It is hard to watch a show that is too aware of its online presence. He is influenced so easily by internet which is why the quality drops after a while.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        ITA – i know some hard core Whovians who were elated when he left Dr Who. They said that they came close to stop watching the show considering how much he pandered to the online fans with some of the plots and characters. Clara was a prime example of this, her character arc pandered to them – plus she was too similar to Amy Pond.

  9. Skippy says:

    Sherlock BBC Season 1 & 2 were fabulous and I am happy to have both on DVD and enjoy them. Sherlock was never The Beatles. I know. I was there. Sherlock had those great 2 seasons and then the writers screwed it up. It was horrendous. Those two writers are very good but they messed up. It started to get boring with the Watson’s wife blah blah. Then it was like a weird 3 Musketeers trip. I could not stick more than 1/8 of the final season. I do not know if I am correct here, but I kind of got like a egomaniac Cumberbatch vibe too.

    • Kate says:

      Not to my understanding, Skippy, Cumberbatch’s actually got a great set rep. In fact, he last filmed that Showtime thing–Melrose?–and crew and even some extras spoke highly of him on social media (they don’t get paid for that, either, LOL).

      Per the S4 Setlock people* from what I recall, Freeman and Cumberbatch were two peas in a pod during filming, but Cumberbatch had a stalker that was scaring the bejesus out of everyone and Freeman was going through his split from Abbington at the time. They stuck to each other but weren’t interacting as much with Gatiss or Moffat (whenever he was there). My guess is they were frustrated with the scripts.

      *The Setlock people who watched all the filming and regularly talked to crew.

    • Trashaddict says:

      I loved Abbington and it really sucked that they had to kill Mary off. Was it because Freeman, who is supposedly such a good actor, couldn’t deal with having her around? She is a damn good actor in her own right. I hope she gets some good parts after this.

  10. SJhere says:

    Sherlock Season One was very good. Season 2 was a lesser effort. The writing was getting unwatchable, the press was insane and the quality went into the crapper.
    I have zero interest in MF.

  11. raincoaster says:

    Didn’t Freeman have a fling with a Sherlock stan that cost him his long-term relationship? Bit rich, then, to be blaming fans for spoiling everything, isn’t it?

    It was the writers who spoiled Sherlock, by pandering to the fans. “Oooh they’ll love this, let’s try it!” seemed to be the only reason for any choices. The entire sister story line was some crap psycho-James-Bond ripoff. I’m tired of “The most unbeatable brilliant evil person who ever lived.” At least the actor who played Moriarty made you think he was real, made you care.

    Why not take a book (ha!) from Conan Doyle and go back to murder mysteries in the Limehouse or stolen racehorses in Suffolk or wherever? The mystery was what was interesting, always. The characters are fascinating, but they’re not ALL of the show.

  12. JanesWastedTalent says:

    I agree with you guys, the show fell apart after Season 2. Several of the comments made me remember this video- it’s a humorous but *very thorough* discussion about how Moffat destroyed Sherlock and Dr Who. I think a lot of you guys would like it- but it is 90 mins long or so, so be forewarned. Interesting though, discusses script writing techniques and things like that.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkoGBOs5ecM

  13. Deering24 says:

    Sherlock was always an uneven show. It benefitted greatly from the three-eps-per-season deal. When it was good (Study In Pink, Great Game, Scandal In Belgravia, The Lying Detective) those eps. were so great they overshadowed the fact there were an almost equal number of dud eps (Hounds Of Baskerville, Blind Banker, Abominable Bride, and the ineffiably godawful Final Problem). And it always felt like the show played its strongest narrative cards (Moriarty, for example) way too early—which, as Freeman noted, left them with the impossible job of constantly topping themselves. There weren’t nearly enough regular fun mysteries—everything was pitched to have The Craziest Villian Evah, the most earth-shaking crimes. It’s easy to see why the creators burned out.

    • tealily says:

      YES! I completely agree. They blew all the big stuff way too early on. It could never have run more than a few seasons (and probably ran a couple more than it should have).

    • raincoaster says:

      Absolutely. Moriarty shouldn’t have even been introduced in the first two seasons. In the actual books, he’s revealed much later as involved in some of the crimes you saw earlier. Here it was literally two episodes and POOF, Moriarty.

      Also, the writers didn’t seem to care about the mystery itself. That was the “chore” for them, while the characters were the meat. Totally the wrong approach. They did genius things in the first two seasons, but how long can you go on doing genius things if you use all your best stuff up immediately?