'09
Delusional Sharon Stone is at it again. Now granted, this is not one of her worst delusions. She’s not telling earthquake victims that they got what they deserved nor is she wearing a puppy coat (as far as I can tell). In fact the issue at hand is that Sharon’s not wearing anything. Sharon posed topless for Maris Match magazine last month, and apparently it’s created quite the furor. How dare a 51-year-old woman bare her boobs! Sharon says age shouldn’t matter, and I absolutely hate myself for agreeing with anything that comes out of that woman’s mouth, but I’ve got to agree with her.
Sharon Stone has slammed critics and justified her decision to go nude at the age of 51. The Basic Instinct star recently stripped for the cover of French fashion bible Paris Matchin, which she wore nothing but bondage heels and underwear.
The beauty feels that age cannot be a determining factor in what she does. “Is there an age when you’re supposed to refrain from doing some things like showing your body? If someone is shocked by these photos that’’s a reflection on his own views on age,” the Daily Express quoted her as saying.
She added: “What these photos represent is nothing surprising to me, my life didn’t change at 50, I didn’t change. I don’t see where the provocation is. If I asked myself I probably wouldn’t have done these photos as I don’t consider myself provocative.”
[From OneIndia]
As much as I never thought I’d write this sentence, Sharon’s right. Her age is absolutely not why she shouldn’t pose nude. Nor is the fact that she has kids – it’s her choice. When I wrote our original article about her pictures, I never criticized her due to her age. Or her body. I criticized her deplorable personality. That’s why people are disgusted by the thought of her naked. Would you want to see the Wicked Witch from “The Wizard of Oz” in all her splendid glory? I’m not even talking about the green knockers. Which I’m sure are colder than a … you get the point. I’m sure Sharon’s are about that frigid too. No one is aroused by the site of a naked woman when she’s so ugly inside. Sharon could have the most fabulous body in the world. She could be 22 again. But as long she she’s got a soul made of tar, there’s no version of her flesh people are going to be aroused by.
Excellent example: Heidi Montag. Now 23-year-old Heidi is not as intentionally evil as Sharon, and doesn’t recommend that teenage girls give boys blowjobs to avoid being raped. But she’s got a terrible personality and is so unattractive in every way on the inside that there is no amount of perfection her body can achieve. She will always be sexless and borderline disgusting.
Sharon, if you’re not getting the accolades you were hoping for, stop deluding yourself into thinking it’s your age and thus everyone else’s problem. It’s your personality, and it’s only your problem.
Here’s Sharon Stone satisfying an itch as she hangs out on vacation in Sardinia yesterday. Images thanks to Pacific Coast News.
Written by JayBird
Posted in Nude, Sharon Stone
- Diet secrets from Jessica Alba's nutritionist [Hollywood Life]
- Hef's twins have beautiful hair [D-Listed]
- The Twilight kids: more "Hills" than cool [Lainey Gossip]
- Ellen premieres on Idol tonight [Popeater]
- Cute photos of Anna Paquin and Steven Moyer exercising [Popsugar]
- JWoww wants bigger implants [Celebslam]
- Look at Handy Manny now [Go Fug Yourself]
30 Responses to “Sharon Stone: if you have a problem with my nude photos you’re ageist”
-
I didn’t find her topless pics offensive. I found it offensive, that she acted like those pics weren’t Photoshopped to the point that she looks like a cartoon version of herself.
But then, like you guys, I find her just an overall wretched person, anyway.
-
She IS a monstah! Not to mention a terrible actress and hypocritical c***.
-
Oh.
We’re prejudiced because the aging tart’s body is unappetizing.
But wait. Her face is looking yummy.
A bit like Joan River’s.
-
You can only photoshop so much. As those blurry shots show, she is looking amazing, no question. But I lost interest in her a few years ago. She’s a fruitloop with an ego the size of Africa.
-
Maybe this is why the old hag physically looks good for her age, she made a pact with the devil there fore she has that evil spewing out of her
-
Jaybird, I have to disagree with you, Heidi Montag is intentionally evil.
-
Yadira - Calling someone an “old hag” will get you nowhere in the end….why? Because your turn is coming whether you like it or not. When it does and oh yes it will, you won’t like someone younger calling you an “old hag”…but what will really bite you in the ass is that the odds of you looking as good as Sharon Stone does at 51 are pretty slim.
-
hasn’t this woman discovered a new schtick yet? she started her career by showing her poon and apparently she wants to end it that way…
hasn’t she figured out something else she’s good at by now? and that stance looks like she’s about to drop a load… not cute!
-
I think she should make another one of her bad movies, where she can act her ass off, or not.
-
Her photoshopped pictures don’t offend me; I mean, her chassis notwithstanding, since it’s mostly covered, how old can her boobs possibly be? 10?
-
Tazina, do you read every comment and completely disect it?
I wasn’t speaking about you so don’t make it something so personal. Get over it. I can be considered an old bag at my age, so what? I’m not having a shit fit over what somebody says on here. It is called celeBITCHY for a reason, no?
-
yadira, I wouldn’t worry about it, that was an unfair criticism…
however, this woman really is kind of worthless… I remember reading somewhere that she needed a coach to talk her through aging and accepting the changes in her face… I mean SERIOUSLY!?!?! you are THAT shallow that you can’t accept the formation of a few lines on your face? how can you be so unimcumbered by life that you need a life coach to talk you through crows feet? whadda waste of space… :/
-
There is nothing more pathetic than a mature woman trying to act to look like a 20 year old. If she acted her age, she would be so much more appealing, instead she comes across as desperate. This is what happens to Hollywood bimbos who reach a certain age and can’t get work because they relied on their looks alone, remember Jayne Mansfield how sadly that ended, how about Jennifer Lopez, no one cares about her stupid ass anymore, cause she’s 40.
You need substance and these women have none. -
@fizXgirl: “hasn’t this woman discovered a new schtick yet? she started her career by showing her poon and apparently she wants to end it that way…
hasn’t she figured out something else she’s good at by now? and that stance looks like she’s about to drop a load… not cute! ”
God, that made me laugh! She does look like she’s about to take a crap.
Maybe she’s got Depends undergarments lurking in those undies. Ooops, was that an ‘ageist’ thing to say?
-
They say there are no roles in Hollywood for women over 40. That may be true if all you had on offer was a hot body and a pretty face. But if you have strong character and a steel backbone you can still get work. Think of Olympia Dukakis, Shirley McClain, Anne Bancroft, and my personal favorite Kathryn Hepburn. These women worked whenever they wanted. Powerful character. Who’d I miss? The Miss Daisy lady and who else……
-
What does it do for her when she poses this way? What does she gain, what does she think?
-
I mostly wonder why she would feel the need/desire to pose topless at age 51. It seems by that age she shouldn’t feel the need to prove anything in that way unless she just hasn’t grown up yet. Oh, wait…I think I just answered my own question.
-
Attention, Megan Fox: This is your future.
-
Did I miss the meeting where it was decided that because something is viewed as vulgar, disturbing, unnecessary or just plain wrong it’s because of some mythical prejudice ?
Act your age not your IQ, Sharon. I can count your good watchable movies on one hand- and no Basic Instinct doesn’t count on my list. Not much of a return on my time investment.
-
Did I miss the meeting where it was decided that because something is viewed as vulgar, disturbing, unnecessary or just plain wrong it’s because of some mythical prejudice ?
Nope but you forgot to add “your just jealous” to that and yes you and I both and many others missed that meeting too.
So don’t feel bad
-
Sharon fancies herself the old-styled glamor movie star. Never did really make it, did she?
That suite in the Nine West Ad to the right is to die for. I wanna live in it.
-
Maybe if the nude photos were tasteful I’d agree with her. But that cover looks gross and trashy. Like, replace her with a nude hairy man with a mustache and you have the cover of a gay porn DVD. Barf.
-
Nothing speacial about her. Fucked her way to where she is, never given birth or been pregnant, selfish beyond words, more surgery than I could fit in this bit. Photoshopped to buggery, attention whore, wooden, bad mother, shitty wife, mental case, loves coke, which keeps her ass skinny, fake tan, fake teeth, fake, fake fake. An old version of Paris Hilton, no biggie, no surprises. And Yes Lady, you are way to old to go around like that, you and Madonna are shameless whores n cholas!
-
I thought she could afford a better boob job.
-
‘Nothing speacial about her….never given birth or been pregnant, selfish beyond words…’
So if I don’t give birth there’s nothing special about me? Why does anyone have to sire a child to be worthwhile? With all the overpopulation and instances of child abuse, I think I’m doing the world a favor.
-
I have more of a problem with Sharon Stone in general, which includes her in any form of nude. Age isn’t the issue.
-
@Aussie…c’mon girl don’t hold back tell us what you REALLY think
If she had anything worthwhile or kind to say Sharon Stone would be very attractive. Fact is is that I don’t know anyone out in the ‘real’ world who looks like her at 51. I sure don’t and I’m almost a decade younger…but that’s ok. I reckon as you get older you still look good, just in different ways. My great husband of 18 months thinks the sun shines out of my a** so who am I to complain??
If Ms Stone had worked as hard on her ‘insides’ as she has on her outsides I don’t think people would go off on her so much. I agree with JB its due to her really ‘ugly’ personality she just sets people’s teeth on edge…or maybe that’s ‘over the edge’
-
@ Susette: Oh LORD!!! I’m dyin laughin over here! That was GREAT!!!!! Attention Megan Fox, This is your future! ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!! Thank you so much for that comment!! Made my early morning!
Leave a Reply
Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.By commenting you agree to our comment policy
Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it has been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.
Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar
I agree completely. She can stroll around in the buff all she wants, but I don’t want to see it. Not because she’s 51, but because I think she’s a monster.
Same goes for Heidi Montag. I don’t want to see that.
Report this comment as spam or abuse