Stars come out to ‘This is It” premiere, film gets mixed reviews

Michael Jackson’s “This Is It” opens in theaters worldwide today, and so far it’s getting mixed reviews. No one seems to be totally slamming it, but many watchers point out that Jackson doesn’t seem to have had the same energy that he used to. Well… he was fifty. It’s not often I write “duh”… but… duh. He’s not going to be the same at fifty as he was at 20. Are you? Thought so. Critics point out that there is absolutely no behind-the-scenes footage whatsoever, nor is there any hint at his private life. This isn’t some complex look into Michael the person. It’s very much about Michael the performer, and Michael the professional.

This Is It is a hybrid, half documentary and half concert film – but not quite either. As a documentary, it merely shows process, with little by way of explanation or exploration. As a concert film, we’re offered the practice sessions rather than the finished product. What does come through is that Jackson worked hard, really hard. He looks a tad thin, but otherwise appears healthy and energetic. We see him sweat through difficult dance routines, reach again and again for high notes, and go through complicated production numbers repeatedly until he nails them. He clearly had a vision, and he gently coaxes his musicians and dancers to make it into a reality.

What we don’t see is Jackson letting his hair down (literally, it’s almost always in a pony tail). We never catch him goofing off, blowing off steam or telling stories about his three children. Oh, sure, at times he prattles on about the power of love and his reverence for the environment, but these come off as pop pieties. The real Michael Jackson, at least as seen here, is all business. Ardent fans will be happy to gaze at their idol in action; moviegoers hoping to understand more fully who Jackson was and what made him tick, besides performing, won’t find answers here.

[From People]

Another People writer says it seems like Jackson was just going through the motions, but notes there are “flashes of brilliance.” The film has a 79% aggregate on Rotten Tomatoes, but a lot of the viewer comments come across as major Jackson fans, the kind that are likely to be biased towards him regardless. People also talks about all the big stars who came out for the premiere. Will Smith was definitely the biggest, joined by Paula Abdul, Paris Hilton, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Neil Patrick Harris, and Anne Heche, among others. Jackson’s brothers were in attendance and made mention about how this wasn’t “it,” this was just the beginning. Logically, because we know they’re going to milk every last dollar they can out of Michael’s memory.

Both People and Us Weekly mention that Jackson’s most personal stuff isn’t personal – he goes off about love and the environment, both of which come across as cheesy to the magazines. They also say his performances were great – it’s everything else that seems to be severely lacking. Since his passing, people have truly wanted to understand Jackson better, and this film isn’t going to get them any closer to it. It’s going to remind them why he became famous in the first place. For better or worse, it’s the last we have of him, and I bet it’ll do well anyway.

People choose some really strange stars to mention coming to the premiere – there were definitely A-list caliber celebs there. Pictured below: Jennifer Love Hewitt, Paula Abdul, Ashley Tisdale, Will Smith, Macy Gray, Anne Heche, Jennifer Lopez, Paris Hilton, Jermain Jackson, Rosanna Arquette, Neil Patrick Harris, Lou Ferrigno, and Randy, Marlon, and Tito Jackson. Images thanks to WENN.com .

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

12 Responses to “Stars come out to ‘This is It” premiere, film gets mixed reviews”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Firestarter says:

    I never was under the impression that this movie had anything to do with the “private” side of Michael. I mean, it is just a bunch of footage from his rehersals. Why would there be anything else in the film?

    As far as him not being 100%, well in addition to his age, musicians and performers, in general, do not give their full attention to rehersals. That is why they are rehersals, to work out the bugs and get things prepped for the “big” show.

  2. JayBird says:

    That’s an excellent point, and it’s not like Jackson or the guys filming his rehearsals knew how it would end. I’m sure it’s not as though they chose not to air more private footage, they worked with what they had.

  3. Sumodo says:

    Ebert LOVED it. I still don’t know if I’ll go. I’ll probably have to go by myself (insert Eyore here) because I live in Country Music country.

  4. Anna says:

    I’m surprised it’s getting such mixed reviews. I was at the premiere here in Zurich last night and thought it was fantastic. I gave it a really good review (I’m a film journalist)! Sure, it has a few small flaws, but all in all, it’s a really fun ride. And the editing, my god, the editing is Oscar worthy. Seriously.

  5. viper says:

    It’s just way too soon for this and frankly shade in my opinion. Way too many people profiting from his death. I’m not too keen on contributing to it. I’ll bootleg it though in a few years. But I am not going to hand somebody a buck when the guy himself is long gone. I even did that when ray charles died, it’s a quirk for me, once an artist is gone of that caliber thats what they are to me. Yes even pavarotii, I can’t bring myself to listen to that mans voice. Maybe Ill be brave enough in the future but right now, these stars are gone and the worl dis that much darker and thats just the reality of it.

  6. Laura says:

    Jaybird, have you read Roger Ebert’s review? It was so well written and he had nothing but great things to say about the movie itself. You should read it.

    http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091027/REVIEWS/910289999

  7. Trillion says:

    Anna: Impressive!

  8. SAM says:

    I saw it last night. Loved it – it was amazing to see all of the things they were planning to do. I thought it looked like it would have been an amazing concert – and thought his moves and voice were great.

    At the beginning of the film they make it clear that the film is a compilation of random footage.

    Several time in the film you hear Michael saying that he had to save his voice while he strengthened it – and a lot of the time they were developing the music and dance at the same time – it was rehersals – so it was never going to look or sound 100% perfect.

    One thing really stood out for my friends watching it – he had amazing back up dancers, but no one could match his style.

  9. moo says:

    maybe it’s just all they could pull off since he died before the actual concerts were going to happen and a lot of people lost a lot of money on it.

  10. Eden says:

    I do believe he was an amazing Father, however he loved his drugs and they killed him! What goes around comes around!!!

    I have no desire to see this “Movie” in order for his family to make money off of his death. If they cared about him they would helped him NO MATTER WHAT! Michael was their Cash Cow. The Jackson Family is disgusting and pathetic.

  11. Many people hold Michael Jackson in high regard, so i bet they were expecting something beyond what they saw.

  12. Iggles says:

    Jackson’s brothers were in attendance and made mention about how this wasn’t “it,” this was just the beginning. Logically, because we know they’re going to milk every last dollar they can out of Michael’s memory

    It’s time for the Jackson brothers to give it a rest. No one cares about them! They aren’t Michael! He was the star, he was brilliant, and they are just money grubbers!