'10
Yesterday, we spent a lot of time going through Rielle Hunter’s epic, crazy, totally wrong interview and photos for GQ. Where she had once been a model of keeping her mouth shut, she revealed herself to be a woman obsessively in love with John Edwards, and completely enamored with his bullsh-t. Oh, and she seems to love the limelight too, so I imagine we’re going to see a lot more of her in the months to come too.
Within just a few hours of the GQ stuff coming online, Rielle apparently spoke to Barbara Walters, telling Babs that she found the photo shoot she participated in willingly to be “repulsive”. She also claimed that she cried and screamed about it, and that her explanation for the shoot was that she “thought that having one of those photos was okay and would be sexy and that there were others that were just beautiful headshots, but that GQ picked photos to hit one note.” Right.
Anyway, GQ revealed their behind-the-scenes video of what went down, and it’s pretty funny in the wake of Rielle’s asinine explanation. You get to see Mark Seliger (the photographer) asking Rielle to position her body in certain ways. So, you know, it was clear that he wasn’t just taking “head shots”. Oh, and he shows her the shots he’s taken! Jesus. I mean, how f-cking insane is this woman? And watch how she plays to all of the cameras! Oh, she thinks she’s the sexiest bitch in the world. She’s even pulling a Jennifer Lopez face, I swear. Here’s the video:
GQ photos of Rielle courtesy of the Washington Post and GQ online.
Written by Kaiser
Posted in Crazy, Creepy, Lies, Rielle Hunter, Stupid
- TV Shows that outstayed their welcome [Pajiba]
- Goopy and Cameron Diaz went to a Coldplay concert [Lainey Gossip]
- The bacon milkshake! [D-Listed]
- Ashanti looks... good? [Go Fug Yourself]
- 20 great songs under 2 minutes [Fark]
- Snooki and J-Woww on notice [IDLYITW]
- Jennifer Aniston through the years [Popsugar]
- Kirsten Dunst looks so pretty here [Evil Beet]
- Mila Kunis without makeup [Celebslam]
- The awful cover letter all of Wall St. is mocking [Gawker]
37 Responses to “Rielle Hunter is a batsh-t insane liar, new GQ video reveals”
Leave a Reply
By commenting you agree to our comment policy
Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.
Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar
What a loon. She seems to think if she says enough nasty things about Elizabeth Edwards, the American public will turn their allegiance from Elizabeth to Rielle and John. What she doesn’t realize is that we can hate all of them equally.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
To be fair, you’re twisting her words. She was upset about the pictures because she knew there were some sexy shots AND some “head shots” and she assumed (rather naively) that the magazine would run mostly head shots and maybe one or two of the sexy ones.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Wacko floozy!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Rielle knows how to get final approval on the photos used in an article. If final approval is not allowed, then you don’t do the interview. You certainly don’t dress and pose inappropriately then whine about the results later.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I think I need to clorox my eyes. Yuck. Also- when they showed the back of her head, you could really see what a nasty dye job she had. She’s in New York and being professionally photographed, why wouldn’t she have better hair? Sorry. Pet peeve. She and “Johnny” deserve each other.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
What time is it because I’m pretty sure I just heard the cuckoo clock chiming.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
My guess is she’s really OK with them, waited for the public reaction, and when it was very negative, then decided to play the innocent victim.
I’m sorry, but lounging on a bed with no pants, and you think they’ll use a head shot? Come on.
And now I’m going to be really mean and say I sincerely doubt any of the head shots were “beautiful”.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
My eyes are bleeding…I feel nauseous.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@ MollyB Funny LOL!
Are we to assume, or should I say visualize in our minds, that this white men’s dress shirt is John’s?
Does she have such little regard or respect for her daughter that she would pose like this. While not pornographic, it is a bit suggestive. Her daughter will one day see these photos.
Do any of these people ever think about the fact that everything is documented on the internet?
I just don’t get it……… :/
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I am with Lucy2, she was fine with the photos until everyone saw them and there was a resounding EEEWWWWWW!!! heard round the world. Then came the “boo-hoo poor me” nonsense.
Personally I suspect that a good part of the ‘eeewwww’ reaction most people had was in regards to her freaky interview, perhaps she should focus on that a bit more.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Please, please, PLEASE for the love of all that is holy, please don’t post those pictures again. I don’t deserve that. No one does.
She’s doing the typical Heidi-backlash-dance: conduct yourself in a disgusting, reprehensible way, then claim victimhood by blaming the mean people who misinterpreted your words or took advantage of your naivete or deceived you into taking dirty pictures (with you posing and your full consent) or any combination of the three. People like that should be shot. Put them out of their misery, and ours!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Home-wrecker!!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
All that blinking in the video makes her look like even more of a dumb floozy.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Just thought of something…Why are we only bashing the moronic home-wrecker? Why do we not hold GQ to a higher standard?
I can’t see them selling many copies of this rag, but shouldn’t journalism have some sort of bench mark for what we, the public, will accept?
Run a story, on the inside, exposing her lunacy, but don’t try to bamboozle us into thinking this little creep is a celebrity, or anyone to be celebrated in any way.
bah humbug to GQ this month.
Besides, isn’t GQ for men? This ‘woman’ certainly does nothing for my husband, ladies, run a poll!!!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@guilty pleasures– Bravo, brava! You tell ‘em.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Why do I see her and immediately think of the other batshit crazy woman, Heather Mills?
Yeah, John Edwards is a nasty, self-absorbed a-hole who deserves the public flogging he’s gotten.
Those pictures are ridiculous. I love that they released the video proving what a lying sack of dog doo she is. And she should avoid the sexy face. She can’t pull it off.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
This just makes me think less of Edwards–and I didn’t think that was possible.
You are who you f***.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
To be fair, one video doesn’t show the entire shoot. There could have been other “scenes” or locations or whatever, and there very well may have been tasteful headshots.
But at the end of the day, the shots she participated in above are still inappropriate.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
The real hypocritical thing is to think that a person should stay in a marriage s/he doesn’t want to be into just because his/her spouse is sick with cancer.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She is such scum.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Rosanna,
Um, when your spouse has cancer, & two young children, you should stay with them. This is a question of character. Abandoning a spouse with terminal cancer is vile.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
As usual, I’m with lucy2. She thought the public would think the photos were hot and when people reacted by dry heaving, she ran with this “repulsive” story.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She might as well have “DITZ” tattooed on her forehead. Take your pants off?? Come on.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@ Pete: Well said, well said!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Rosanna, #19: is that you, Reille? You are absolutely right. What husband really wants to stay around after a child has died, and then his wife has the audicity to regain cancer. (I’m being sarcastic, because this is what marriage is, a partnership for better or worse, sickness or health. Unless you are John Edwards, who doesn’t “do” sick, apparently. He does do crazy, and This ho is crazy, and so is her man. This whole thing is atrocious. No moral character to be found here.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Reille Hunter has quite a checkered past… she was previously known as Lisa Druck… has anybody else read “Story of My Life”?
I was sure she would pop herself back into the limelight in some messed-up way; over-entitled and in need of therapy!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She needs to just follow the Angelina playbook – lure him away, marry Johnny, publicize the romance like it’s the most epic love story ever, do tons of humanitarian work, have several more kiddies, sell the pics of them for money, donate some of that $ to charity…and viola…on the road to sainthood. Funny how many of us worship Angie, who is also a “homewrecker” but vilify this lady, and lots of others, like LeAnn Rimes….
Report this comment as spam or abuse
That poor poor kid.
Rielle
and John Edwards?
Poor kid.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Why is she even in GQ? I just don’t get how all these skanky women continue to be rewarded and receive press time for being a sl*t.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
A slimeball that sleeps with a slimeball-married-man is a psycho liar? I shocked! Just shocked.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Her chin needs an agent or at the very least top-billing.
There is nothing else I could say that hasn’t already been said about this dick-infested whore mattress.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Madelyn Rose, I think there’s a difference between this situation and celebrities. For one, Jennifer Aniston was never terminally ill. For another, politicians portray a false image of themselves, insist they are for family values, then go and be hypocrites. To top it all off, they usually then do some desperate and embarrassing cover up that implodes to make them look even more hypocritical. Generally I don’t think celebs do that to such a spectacular degree.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
For those of you who think she was naive, you are SO wrong. She knows how to play the game… Is anyone else a WAY back Deceiver reader? She is made of so many facades it’s not even funny.
I still believe she is backed by the Edwards PR camp. They may or may not be in total control, but I bet they are speed dialing her constantly in the past couple of weeks. Either way, she has lawyers she SHOULD have had brief her on her rights for contractual interviews. Anytime money is exchanged for an “exclusive” there is a written agreement.
Back to my point for posting. GQ is a gentlemen’s rag in the same way Playboy interviews try to be Newsweek. It doesn’t have to be held accountable for Money Shots making sales perk in a market that is DYING. Printed publications are hurting, massively. It’s like saying the page Six should be cut out because it’s blind items hurt young people’s vision of what Hollywood is like.
She should have covered her Scarlet letter cooch! That’s all her! SHE knew GQ can’t MAKE her take her clothes off to take photos of her face! DUH!!!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
A picture is worth 1000 words. There is a name for wome like her: trash. I hope she and “johnny” will be very miserable together and Quinn turns out to be hell raiser who will shame them both–I know, dear reader, I mean no real harm to the child..I get wound up!)
Report this comment as spam or abuse
i agree, there is a difference, jennifer the wife at the time have said, and i quote, (no one cheated) how much clearer can it be? now, moving on,yes, john is slime, but this woman kept quiet but had her family and friends do all her dirty work so not to upset her prey, john, she set john up from the get go, calling and sending cameras where ever they were to meet. she is a nut job alright, poor Elizabeth. on top of everything else, having to deal with an insensitive, conniving, opportunistic crazy person.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Octomom with way fewer progeny.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Lots of eye blinking = liar. And posing with children’s toys while looking like a slut. That’s just sick.
Report this comment as spam or abuse