Is Jon Kortajarena Madonna‘s new boy-toy? Hmm… [A Socialite Life]
Michelle Rodriguez needs a comb. [Hollywood Rag]
I kind of like this Sarah Jessica Parker look. But the hair could be better. [Go Fug Yourself]
Anna Torv (the chick from Fringe) goes topless. [The Blemish]
Best. Scary. Mirror. Montage. Ever. [D-Listed]
Jennifer Aniston‘s ass is on promotional duty again. [Egotastic]
Lady Gaga is shy. For real. [I’m Not Obsessed]
Mm… Colin Farrell! Ondine actually looks really good. [Pajiba]
Barbara Streisand is still crazy. [PopEater]
Katie Holmes is still working on her fashion line. [LaineyGossip]
Sherri Shepherd does not care for this Heidi Montag chica. [Jezebel]
Beyonce in Brazil: this is NOT Carmen Miranda. [Starpulse]
Megan Fox is doing hooker reshoots for Jonah Hex. [Yeeah]
Is Rihanna copying M.I.A. now? [The Frisky]
Just kill me, because I kind of like Kevin Federline for doing this. [Celebslam]

Posted in Links

Behold, baby Benjamin Brady, son of Gisele Bundchen and Tom Brady! He looks… just like a sleepy baby. Hmm…

Back in December, Gisele Bundchen gave birth to a baby boy. It took a little while (like a week), but eventually Gisele and husband Tom Brady came up with a name for their little one: Benjamin “Button” Brady. No, not really with the “Button” but still. Ben Brady is a cute name. Anyway, since then, no one has gotten a photo of little Ben. Gisele didn’t go the People Magazine route, she and Tom didn’t “let” a paparazzi catch them in a “candid” moment with the baby. Until now! What’s shocking, though, is that it wasn’t an American publication that scooped up this candid photo - it was a Brazilian magazine called Quem.

The Brazilian magazine Quem got its hands on the first photos of Gisele Bunchden and her son Benjamin, taken during a trip out in Boston at the end of January. So far this is the only image out of little Benjamin, who’s looking so cute at just 2 months old!

Gisele, meanwhile, is already getting back to modeling with her first shoot for the Brazilian brand Colcci. She might be giving up a lot of work to stay home with her son, though Gisele said she’s feeling ready to pose again after a minute of post-birth doubt.

[From Pop Sugar]

Well, good for them. My guess is that Gisele worked it out with the Quem editors that they would get the first photo, rather than an American publication. She’s representin’ for Brazil, bless her heart. As I’ve mentioned before, I warmed to Gisele considerably when she was pregnant - she came across as very sweet and cool. Of course, now that the baby has been born, Gisele won’t shut up about how easy the birth was, how the midwife thinks she was so brave, how she did it all without drugs and in a bathtub, and how easy it all was for her to drop her baby weight - even though she stayed so slim she didn‘t even wear maternity clothes. Yes, the old Gisele is back.

Quem cover courtesy of Pop Sugar and Quem online.

Posted in Babies, Gisele Bundchen, Tom Brady

This question is directed at all the ladies out there: have you ever been so completely attracted to a man that you can’t even concentrate on something truly terrible and heart-wrenching, just because you’re too busy fantasizing about what the guy looks like naked? I find myself in that position as I watch this PSA Daniel Craig recorded on behalf of Artists for Peace and Justice, an organization that is currently organizing money and personnel for Haitian relief. It’s all very important and tragic and sad and overwhelming, but hearing Daniel describe, with that incredible, sexy, slightly raspy, panty-dropper voice of his, I can barely focus.

That being said, Daniel doesn’t look all that great in the PSA. The lighting is kind of meh, and Daniel could use a hot bath and a shave. Which gets me thinking about him naked again. Daniel tells us about Artists for Peace and Justice, saying: “This wonderful organization, which has been operating for over two years in Haiti, has suddenly become much more important because, obviously, of the events of the past few weeks.” The website for Artists for Peace and Justice is here, and the site has even more videos up - including two more panty-droppers, Simon Baker and Javier Bardem. Jesus, do they want us to donate money or take off our drawers?!? I can’t tell!

Screencaps courtesy of Artists for Peace and Justice.

Posted in Daniel Craig, Good Causes, Sexy

Here is Anne Hathaway on the cover of In Style’s March issue. Pretty, isn’t it? That shade of amethyst is lovely on her, unlike the weird blue feathered crap that Rachel Zoe put her in for the Valentine’s Day premiere. I like Anne so much better when she keeps her makeup simple and her hair loose. I swear, whoever does her hair and makeup for most of the red carpets makes Anne look about 40 years old. Anyway, good cover, and a pretty good interview too… Anne is self-effacing about her “weird features.”

Anne Hathaway looks as unequivocally gorgeous and radiant as ever on the March cover of InStyle—though she’s probably the only person out there who doesn’t see it: “I think I’ve got really weird features. I have very large features on a very small head,” she tells the magazine.

“But, you know, I’m not going to beat myself up. It’s my face. I’m not very pretty. But that’s OK because I do know that I look like myself, and I think at the end of the day, as nice as pretty is, authenticity is more important.”

The self-effacing actress continues: “If I don’t work out at all, I have too much curve and no tone—which is not OK. It’s about finding balance.”

Hathaway strives for equilibrium in the way she dresses too, with her tomboy-by-day, glamazon-by-night approach: “In the evening it would never occur to me to go out in motorcycle boots like this,” she says, referring to the black Burberry pair she wore to her interview. “I love going out in high heels and dressing up and glamming it up, and having there be a distinction between what happened throughout the day and the evening.”

As to where she finds style inspiration, the 27 year-old, who calls out Marc Jacobs as one of her “all-time favorite designers,” has a long list of Hollywood peers who demonstrate “innovation and originality,” including Tilda Swinton, Gwen Stefani, Lady Gaga, Selma Blair, and Natalie Portman, and says: “I like people who are true to themselves.”

[From People Magazine]

I do think Anne has unusual features, but it works for her and that’s what makes her beautiful rather than “average” or “pretty, I guess”. Sure, her styling is hit-or-miss, but when it’s a hit, she’s an absolutely stunning woman.

Meanwhile, a new interview excerpt just came out from Anne’s GQ UK cover profile - this is the one where it seemed the whole piece about comparing Anne to Angelina Jolie. Anyway, Anne tells the magazine that she left the Catholic Church because her brother is gay:

Anne Hathaway’s family left the Catholic Church because of its intolerance of homosexuality. Anne grew up wanting to become a nun but shunned Catholicism when she learned her older brother, Michael, was gay.

“The whole family converted to Episcopalianism after my elder brother came out,” she told British GQ. “Why should I support an organization that has a limited view of my beloved brother?”

But Episcopalianism didn’t really take either.

“So I’m … nothing,” she said. “F-ck it, I’m forming. I’m a work in progress.”

[From Huffington Post]

I don’t really have anything to say about what religions are cool with gay people and all of that stuff. But I will say this - I think it’s great that Anne (and her whole family, it seems) chose to put love ahead of Church dogma. I really do.

One last note about Hathaway’s GQ cover… HuffPo claims that someone got a little over-zealous with the Photoshop and edited out Anne’s armpit. To me, it just looks like they made the skin look nice, but it’s not too much. Meh. Tempest in a teapot.

InStyle cover courtesy of People Magazine. GQ UK cover courtesy of previous Celebitchy post.

Posted in Anne Hathaway, Gay Issues, Religion

I don’t even know what to say with this. Here is Lindsay Lohan’s cover for the Spring/Summer issue of the French magazine Purple. Is Lindsay trying to be controversial? Like, I call this piece of art “The Crackhead on the Cross”. Maybe she has no idea what she’s doing. Maybe the photographer (Terry Richardson) was just like “put your arms out straight, like you just got pulled over for driving under the influence.” And Lindsay replied, “I drunk not, oss-ifer. Ima Jesus!”

Lindsay Lohan is on the cover of another magazine, this time it’s French fashion magazine Purple.

Since it’s supposed to be more of an edgy magazine or something, Terry Richardson shot Lindsay as Jesus with her outstretched arms and a crown of thorns. So shocking!

And we mean that, too. It’s pretty shocking that this is the first time in a while Linds didn’t even have to show her boobs for a fashion spread.

And Lindsay’s Jesus dress-up fun isn’t all that’s going on in her cluttered life today. There’s also talk that Sam Ronson allegedly abused her, Jessica Alba says Lindsay never hooked up with her husband, Cash Warren, and Linds took to her Twitter to try to convince us she doesn’t use lip injections. In other words, it’s just a normal day for Lindsay.

[From E! News]

Yes, I guess it’s a good thing that Lindsay isn’t doing another softcore pr0n photo shoot. She’s fully clothed on this cover, so maybe she’ll be wearing clothes inside as well? Probably not. When she was doing the shoot back in November, the rumor was that it included a threesome. So… yeah. So Christ-like.

Purple Magazine cover courtesy of E! News.

Posted in Lindsay Lohan