Sophie Chandauka ‘managed to pull £342,000 in donations’ for Sentebale

Sophie Chandauka committed a hostile takeover of Sentebale last year. The board of trustees tried to oust her, but she refused to leave. Then most of the board resigned in disgust, and Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso resigned in solidarity from the charity they founded in 2006. In the months that followed, Sentebale’s fundraising dried up and Chandauka looted the charity’s cash reserves. She also fired a lot of Sentebale employees, mothballed the Sentebale Children’s Center in Lesotho and closed down the charity’s London office. In April of this year, Chandauka sued Prince Harry and Mark Dyer for “defamation,” and claimed that she was using “external funding” for the lawsuit. Not suspicious at all! Also not suspicious: according to the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden, Sentebale is having a banner year when it comes to fundraising.

Losing not one but two royal patrons amid a storm of accusation and counter-accusation might be considered enough to condemn any organisation to a bleak future. But, 18 months after it lost Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, Sentebale, the charity they founded in 2006, is displaying signs of admirable vigour and a renewed sense of purpose.

Despite Harry and Seeiso’s departures – following the resignations of several trustees, including Mark Dyer, sometimes known as Harry’s ‘second dad’ – Sentebale, now chaired by Sophie Chandauka, managed to pull in £342,000 in donations in the last financial year. That’s nearly £50,000 more than in 2024.

Chandauka, with whom Harry and Seeiso’s relationship was said to have deteriorated ‘beyond repair’, also presided over a substantial rise in legacies. Money bequeathed to Sentebale more than trebled from £47,000 to £189,000.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the charity’s annual report, just published, bristles with defiance.

‘We ran Sentebale with commercial discipline… rigorous on cost, ambitious in impact and focused on the value of every pound entrusted to us,’ it states. Chandauka won’t be complacent though. The polo matches which Harry played in always proved a payday for Sentebale.

Without them, ‘events income’ plunged from £715,000 to £70,000, while cash from institutional sources dropped from £2.6 million to £1.7 million.

But Chandauka may well think it a price worth paying. Following Harry’s resignation, she went on television and accused him of ‘harassment and bullying at scale’, of playing ‘the victim card’, and observed that ‘the number-one risk for this organisation was the toxicity of its lead patron’s brand’. He denied the claims.

[From The Daily Mail]

Prince Harry generally tried to do one or two Sentebale fundraising polo matches a year, and those polo matches raised millions of dollars. That’s why Sentebale had millions in cash reserves when Chandauka played out her audacious takeover scheme. She looted the cash reserves, lavished money on “consultants,” stopped providing Sentebale’s services, and now she wants a gold star for raising a fraction of the money she already wasted (while also ignoring the fact that Harry’s polo matches were major fundraising boons). And what services will Sentebale provide at this point? Sentebale is a shell of what it once was, and this new money will inevitably go towards Chandauka lining her own pockets and paying for more external “consultants.” She’s also never answered the questions about where she got the money to sue Harry and Mark Dyer.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images, screencaps courtesy of Sky News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

11 Responses to “Sophie Chandauka ‘managed to pull £342,000 in donations’ for Sentebale”

  1. YankeeDoodles says:

    And they’re putting out this news the same day that Harry and Meghan are in Nottingham….. JFC. This sh*tshow reeks of the desperate propaganda that Americans were subjected to when the Zapruder film finally aired on tv (in 1975) and the Warren Commission was exposed for the sham that it was. Really. Don’t believe your lying eyes, we have 26 volumes of “testimonials.” Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Harry is really risking his safety, his reputation, his financial foundation, his kids’ future, and he clearly believes the risk is worth it, because if all he wanted was money, he has plenty now. He’s playing for bigger stakes and I am HERE for it.

  2. NoBS Please says:

    All of £342,000??

    So just about enough to cover Sophie’s salary, before her likely £500’000 in “expenses”…

    What a scammer.

  3. Shiela Kerr says:

    More for her to steal

  4. GMHQ says:

    Richard Eden is a sleaze. So the charlatan who stole a respected and successful charity out from under its board and founders has raised less money than the salary she demanded for herself and Maureen calls that a victory. And how much support did they provide for the kids? Likely very little, but the Mail and the other haters could not care less so long as they take their shots in at Prince Harry, regardless of the human consequences in Africa.

  5. Amy Bee says:

    300,000 pounds is not an achievement when you consider that Harry polo marches raised 1 million alone every year in the past.

  6. tamsin says:

    Is this info from their annual report? Did Sophie pay herself first? Is there going to be proof that the charity actually did some charity work?

  7. Nlopez says:

    Ill be glad when this aunt tom crawls back under the rock she came from.

  8. Yvette says:

    Hmm … I wonder who might have been inspired to make such a large donation in such a timely manner? Especially since Richard Eden announced it in his column at the Daily Mail yesterday. I wonder who?

  9. KC2 says:

    I still don’t understand the refusing to leave. Does the Board not have the power to fire her?

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment