Daniel Craig & Rachel Weisz spent Christmas together – it’s so on

NEW YORK - SEPTEMBER 13:  Rachel Weisz and Daniel Craig attend a private screening of 'Enduring Love' at the MGM screening room September 13, 2004 in New York City.  (Photo by Bowers/Getty Images)

I told you it was on! Well, I had some doubts too, but I was coming down on the side of wanting there to be something there, just for the sheer hotness level. So guess who spent the holidays together? Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz! OH YES. As you may remember, Rachel split from her longtime partner Darren Aronofsky a few months ago, and the immediate rumor was that she and Daniel Craig had been boning while they worked together earlier this year. The British tabloids were all over it, and some unnamed sources “confirmed” their affair, and it was widely reported that Daniel had dumped his longtime girlfriend Satsuki Mitchell at some point over the past few months. And now there are photos of Daniel and Rachel together! Like they are announcing their coupling! The photos are here, at The Daily Mail.

They were first linked together last month after she was said to be ‘smitten’ with her Bond co-star. But despite quashing the rumours they were an item, Rachel Weisz and Daniel Craig will have trouble denying their romance now after they were snapped hand-in-hand during a cosy Christmas break together.

Pictures in the News of the World today show the pair, who star together in Dream House due to be released next year, laughing and holding hands while away together in Somerset. Craig, 42, and Weisz, 40, were pictured bundled up against the cold as they went for a stroll by the £1,000 a week cottage near Yeovil.

According to sources, they left the cosy bolthole on Christmas Eve and headed to the local pub.

An onlooker said: ‘Daniel and Rachel looked like a romantic couple in a film. They were laughing and hanging on to each other’s words and stopping to take photos of each other.’

And one fellow customer in the pub added: ‘They were clinging to each other like honeymooners. The chemistry was obvious.’

The pair, who have know each other for several years, were brought together to star alongside each other in Dream House, due for release next year. Weisz plays the wife of a New York publishing executive, played by Craig, who relocates his family to a town in New England only to discover their perfect home was the murder scene of a mother and her two children.

They were then romantically linked last month after Weisz split from her fiancé director Darren Aronofsky.

A source close to The Mummy star said she was ‘head over heels’ for Craig and added: ‘Rachel and Daniel simply sparked during the filming of Dream House in Canada. They have great chemistry. Darren’s such a good and responsible man, but Daniel’s the opposite extreme, he’s brooding and mysterious. Darren and Rachel have simply grown apart, they spent long periods away from each other, moving in different directions.’

And shortly afterwards, Weisz and Aronofsky issued a joint statement that said: ‘Rachel Weisz and Darren Aronofsky have been separated for some months. They remain close friends and are committed to raising their son together in New York.’

Craig got engaged to producer Satsuki Mitchell two years ago after he proposed with a Cartier ring and said she helps keep him grounded.

He said: ‘I couldn’t get though it without her. You’ve got to have a sense of perspective and she gives me that.’

But recent reports have suggested that they have now split up, although Craig has yet to deny or confirm this.

[From The Daily Mail]

Homewreckers, all of them. Hot, sexy homewreckers. It’s so interesting, this little piece of news. I wouldn’t think Daniel would want any part of his private life out in the open, at all, but going to a pub and being affectionate with his jumpoff is an interesting development. Maybe he wants people to know that this is for real. Maybe it’s true love? As for Rachel… well, I’m kind of disappointed in her, even though I understand how a woman could throw away a stable relationship with the father of her child for a sex-filled romance with a brooding James Bond. Sigh…

47330, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - Thursday November 11 2010. Rachel Weisz moves quickly to hide her left hand as she is spotted shopping with a friend in New York. Weisz, who recently split from fiance of nine years Darren Aronofsky, was wearing a ring on her engagement finger. Rumours that Weisz has been having an affair with James Bond star Daniel Craig have been quashed by friends of the Oscar-nominated actress. Miss Weisz was making her way to Kiehls with her friend. Photograph: Wagner Az, PacificCoastNews.com

28015, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM, Sunday, February 8, 2009, UK, IRELAND, DUBAI, USA AND CANADIAN USE ONLY: Daniel Craig at the 2009 Orange British Academy Film Awards at the Royal Opera House in London. The British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) is a British charity that hosts annual awards shows for excellence in film, television, television craft, video games and forms of animation. Photograph: PacificCoastNews.com ****** 44 131 557 7760 and 131 557 7761 USA: 310 261 9676

TORONTO, ON - SEPTEMBER 13: Actress Rachel Weisz attends the The Variety Studio At Holt Renfrew Day 4 held at Holt Renfrew, Toronto during the 35th Toronto International Film Festival on September 13, 2010 in Toronto, Canada. (Photo by Alexandra Wyman/Getty Images)

Daniel Craig in the 81st Academy Awards Press Room at the Kodak Theater in Los Angeles, CA on.February 22, 2009.2009 Kathy Hutchins / Hutchins Photo... . Photo via Newscom Photo via Newscom

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

52 Responses to “Daniel Craig & Rachel Weisz spent Christmas together – it’s so on”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. brin says:

    Well, it’s still new so it’s all romance & hot sex…let’s see what happens, you know how these things come & go…fickle celebs.

  2. malachais says:

    Seems like Darren is being portrayed like the “good and responsible” parent, sounds like they’re trying to make Rachel look bad.

    I get the feeling both of them were in unhappy relationships when they started falling for each other or may have already split up with their partners prior to this. I’ve never heard anything negative about Rachel Weisz so I tend to lean towards the latter.

    Daniel and Rachel make a fabulous couple!!

  3. Gwen says:

    They look hot together – that’s all I’ve got right now. I do feel sorry for the child though.

  4. lrm says:

    rachel looks so muchn younger than 40~ and they DO look so hot together! def. chemistry in that top photo. nice for them(:

  5. Ann says:

    Is Craig really only 42? He looks so much older!

  6. nok says:

    she is butt ugly, can’t stand her acting either, he’s going to move on to the next excitement after this fling

  7. Seeer says:

    So they split up with their respective partners to be together after they worked together eh? Interesting how people see this as “nice” and “hot”. No one is calling Weisz (or Craig!) a homewrecking so and so. Interesting indeed.

    I’m pretty indifferent about the both of them so don’t care about this relationship either way, I just find it fascinating how the perception of the same set of circumstances can change from couple to couple.

  8. DD says:

    Daniel is not hot, at least not anymore. He definitely looks really old. Rachel on the other hand looks like she’s getting younger. That woman is beautiful.

  9. the original bellaluna says:

    I STILL wonder what this is going to do to her career…Darren directed her in The Constant Gardener (it was even re-written to accommodate her pregnancy with their child) and The Fountain, not to mention the other films I’m unable to name off the top of my head. He truly seemed to work in her best interest. Hmmm…

  10. lisa says:

    @seeer..

    I was going to comment.. but you put it perfectly. Nothing to add..

    Thanks.

  11. Solveig says:

    I don’t see pictures of them together, except the ones taken on the set of the movie they’re filming.
    Anyway, if it’s true, I don’t see homewrecking because both couples have split up before they hooked up, no?
    Nice thoug, but just because she’s so beautiful that she balances his ugliness.

  12. guesty says:

    @brin…ita…can’t wait to see what happens with these two.

  13. Jenna says:

    Ditto to everything you said, Seeer.

  14. bronwynfahr says:

    Lucky ho! He is just so sexy to me. The things I would do to that man.

  15. frosty says:

    Seeer, I absolutely agree with everything you said. What makes them so different than other celebrities who have been beat to death for similar circumstances (Sienna Miller, for one). Craig is a manwhore. I don’t see how he gets it though, to me he looks like he’s been hit with an ugly stick one too many times. As for Rachel, I don’t see how she could not be with her child at Christmas. It all sounds very selfish to me, and I’ll bet my new refrigerator that they won’t last anyway.

  16. ? says:

    How do we know he dumped Satsuki? Maybe she dumped him after finding out he had feelings for Rachel?
    Why do we assume it’s always the man who leaves?
    Anyway Satsuki has money and a lux apt in NY $2mill. Settlement no doubt.

  17. Trish says:

    They really do make a nice looking couple. Hopefully they were both respectful to each of their exs’ and made a clean break. Endings are always sad.

  18. ? says:

    Hopefully this isn’t a rebound thing though and they don’t spend a lot of time apart. That can kill any relationship in showbiz.

    It may only be a short term fling but they look happy.

  19. waq says:

    Everyone is being so nice and giving them the benefit of the doubt despite the timing of everything. How not surprising.

    I would wait to see cries of “homewrecker” and “cheater” from the public and media but I doubt there will be any. We won’t be mourning the loss of two couples breaking up with their significant others five years down the road.

    Those double standards only apply to one couple.

  20. Trish says:

    And another thing, Rachel Weisz is 40?! I’ll take a 50 gallon drum of WHATEVER she’s using!

  21. Lisa says:

    Well, Seeer and Jenna, I don’t think it’s nice! I loved the idea of Craig with Satsuki Mitchell and I’m (for reasons I have zero facts to substantiate) coming down as anti-Weisz in this situation.

  22. louise says:

    I don’t understand the great couple comments. Why is it when some people have affairs they are great and others are evil? Julia Roberts, Meg Ryan, etc are still loved even after their affairs. People still wish death to Angelina Jolie after almost 6 years.

  23. ? says:

    to lisa

    Well unfortunately the Satsuki fans will have to deal with it.
    It’s over, move on.
    Glad to see him with a British girl at last. I think they’ll have tons of fun.
    If you’re a fan of his, you would want him to be happy and judging by the new pics, he is!

  24. ? says:

    Pics of them together on the News of the World are great! They both knew they were going to photographed.

    to wtf:
    Awwww, were you a Satsuki fan? Oh well…

    Maybe it was Darren’s turn to have their son this Xmas, after all, they have been split up for awhile now.
    They are all adults. Let me tell you if you had the chance to be with your son or Daniel over Xmas, you’d choose Daniel.
    I’d think you’d be a hypocrite to say otherwise!

    As for calling him a homewrecker, Satsuki is nicely paid up and is a millionaire in her own right now due to the handsome payoff he gave her. He’s paid his dues to her and she accepted the terms. So surely Satsuki is just as bad then? If he did cheat on her, then she accepted the monetary apology, the $2 m New York apartment and some very expensive works of art.

    But let’s face it, their whole relationship was really stalling for awhile now, he really didn’t look happy, he never married her after all this time (the wedding band was such a farce), whatever the rings meant they evidently meant zero in the end. He simply didn’t love her enough. Body language said it all in many pictures.

    I’m happy that they didn’t have to divorce and a child wasn’t involved. Can you imagine what you all would say then?
    I bet Daniel’s happy too about that. Could have been really cumbersome.

  25. original kate says:

    i don’t get the craig appeal. at all.

  26. the original bellaluna says:

    @ ? – There IS a child involved; she & Darren have a child. Hello? It may not be a divorce, but after 5 years and a child, it’s really only semantics, don’t you think?

  27. ? says:

    to Leo:

    And she’ll say she was with his gorgeous James Bond father in law! LOL.
    I’m sure her son Henry will deal with it.
    After all Daniel was in another relationship when his daughter Ella was small and Ella (now 18) seems to very well adjusted.
    Seems to me you’re the one having problems with your parents history?
    Sorry about that. I hope you get better.

    There is a little of me that thinks that he wanted to up the ante on his image a bit. The womanizer image he has is something he cherishes even though he gives the impression he doesn’t. Look at the women he’s been involved with.
    Things were going stale and now he’s with an Oscar winner.
    Daniel knows what’s what and he’s aware of this PR especially with four films coming out next year including Dream House. Can you imagine how well this film will do now???
    He’s not stupid. *wink*
    One site called him a player, not far wrong.

  28. Gwen says:

    Since when is the Morality Central? I know very little of these two so I can’t really comment very much on gossip. In real life people split up and get new partners quickly too – I bet there’ll be lots to dish on later with these two. But for now we really don’t know much, do we? Geesh..

  29. ? says:

    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=GOOWVR1H
    Rach and Dan together.

    Let’s hope she liked the lingerie he was apparently spotted buying over the last week in London.

  30. mln76 says:

    Yeah there is obviously a double standard in the media and in the gossip world. Angie/Brad will never live down the triangle.
    That being said I reserve my contempt for the LeeAnn Rimes and the Courtney Arquettes out there. And wish these two the best I really think they tried their best to keep things out of the media for as long as possible.

  31. Chris says:

    I can’t understand how a parent could spend Xmas in England when they have a child in New York. Rachel looks good, but if you look at her neck, in the fourth photo, you can see the signs of her age which suggests that she’s had some work done on her face.

  32. dr_bambi says:

    To the original bellaluna:

    Aronofsky had nothing to do with Constant Gardener. CG was directed by the fabulous Fernando Meirelles. FM is also the director of magnificent City of God movie (about the infamous slum in Rio De Janeiro).

    Aronofsky only directed Weisz in The Fountain. He’s not been involved with any of her other projects. I don’t think her career will be impacted by splitting from Aronofsky.

  33. dan says:

    i have a feeling they wont be together for long.
    he had a fling with Kate Moss for two months after he broke up with heike and then onto satsuki long term.
    he wants to get back on the radar as he has films coming up.

    this is a publicity rebound screw. esp for her, and to get back at darren as he was pic snogging another woman. and to get back at satsuski probably for thumbscrewing him about marriage and babies and calling up papers no doubt, nothing more, nothing less.

  34. re: Satsuki says:

    Sats stated to a UK paper via a source in 2005 that if ever Daniel cheated on her (this was after the Sienna affair) again, there would no second chances.
    Maybe he did and she said it’s over.
    STAND BY YOUR MAN
    Satsuki Mitchell, the girlfriend of new Bond star Daniel Craig, will stand by her man despite allegations he had an affair with Sienna Miller. Production exec Satsuki, who met Daniel on the set of The Jacket last year, was by Daniel’s side when he was officially unveiled as the sixth 007 on Friday. “Satsuki has done a lot of soul-searching, but she has decided not to throw away her one-year relationship with Daniel,” a friend said. “She believes that everyone should be forgiven one mistake. But it will be a very different matter if he does it again.” (18 October, 2005, 8AM) SOURCE: NEWS OF THE WORLD

  35. Kath says:

    “i don’t get the craig appeal. at all.”

    I get it and I don’t. From certain angles and with perfecting lighting, he’s ruggedly handsome. But change the angle and all of a sudden he’s an odd looking old guy.

    And no WAY is he 42. My guess is 55-58.

  36. Majosha says:

    “Let me tell you if you had the chance to be with your son or Daniel over Xmas, you’d choose Daniel.
    I’d think you’d be a hypocrite to say otherwise!”

    Actually, I’d choose my son without hesitation. In fact, it wouldn’t even qualify as a “choice” in my mind (although I’m not claiming to know the details behind Rachel’s situation). And I have no idea how that makes me a hypocrite, but whatever.

  37. ? says:

    to kath:
    He was born March 2 1968. Do the math.

    to majosha:
    Yeah right.

  38. Emma says:

    I’m with you Kaiser -I’m disappointed in Rachel but at the same time… That is one hot couple. Carpe Diem, Rachel.

  39. Kath says:

    Born March 2 1968? Nope, sorry, not buying it.

  40. Majosha says:

    @?: You honestly can’t process the possibility that a parent might actually choose her child over her f*ck buddy? Wow, that’s really unfortunate.

  41. Chrissy says:

    When I clicked on Celebitchy and read the titles, I swear my first thought ….
    Rachel – one hell of a lucky girl!!
    Crystal Harris – one hell of an unlucky girl!

    Go Rachel! Enjoy it while it lasts!

  42. to all says:

    You all need to grow up.
    She’s Jewish and her son was with his father, they don’t celebrate Christmas so she didnt miss it with her son. She was there for Hannukah and everything else important in the Jewish celebrations as well as as 99% of Henry’s life when he’s not with his father. Having said that, his father wouldn’t want his son around Daniel right now anyway.

    As for Daniel, he’s allowing himself to be part of this, no-one forced him so stop focusing the blame entirely on Rachel.
    Daniel knows she has a four year old and evidently it didnt bother him that Rachel was away from him.
    Similarly he didnt spend Christmas with his 18 yr old. Still his only daughter no matter how old and they hardly see each other as it is.

    They are two consenting adults and it takes two to f*ck and they wanted to do it over Christmas as well and be seen doing it.

    As for Daniel’s age, then his birth certificate must be wrong.

  43. Sandy says:

    Cute couple. Hope they last.

  44. huh says:

    Wow Daniel and Rachel already have their very own loon! How exciting for them!!

  45. Macheath says:

    @?
    Rachel, is that you?

  46. OfficialBitch says:

    He’s ugly and she’s a douchebag.
    Say goodbye to your “career” Rachel. Gosh this woman is so unremarkable and her acting stinks!
    He is butt FUG yet can act.
    This won’t last – both have huge ginormous EGOS.
    Who cares?
    NEXT!!

  47. N.D. says:

    Really, people. When couple separates/divorces it’s inevitable that they both start spending some of the holydays without their kid(s). It’s a fact of life. It’s especially unsensical to demand them to be spending it all together when they just went trough break up no matter how amicable it was. They are doing the right thing for the circumstances and they are quiet about it – no war in press etc. Leave them alone.

  48. elina says:

    they are HOTT together! whew!

  49. to all says:

    Finally, they admit a mistake about marriage. Must of been idiots to think they were.
    http://www.gossipcop.com/daniel-craig-rachel-weisz-pictures-holding-hands-dating-couple/

  50. dahlia47 says:

    Is this true? That was the pic of them on set of a movie. Anyway he looks really hot in this top pic with the t-shirt on!! And she looks so innocent. I wish I were her.

  51. Athena says:

    How hypocritical, you rake Leann over the coals for her affair but Rachel gets a pass? Please. I feel sorry for Darren and her son.

  52. Tina says:

    Rachel and Darren have been split for some time. When celebrities announce a break up, it is usually done and over with well before the official announcement. There is no proof that Rachel had an affair with Daniel before she separated from Darren.