Jodie Foster calls lower percentage of female directors “race psychology”

foster007

Just one year ago, Kathryn Bigelow won the Oscar for Best Director, an award that was voted upon by her peers, who themselves are the very force behind getting movies made in Tinseltown. Regardless, Jodie Foster is now complaining about Hollywood’s treatment of female directors, which I find rather contradictory. Jodie can speak in terms of chronic discrimination against women in the film industry, whereas she has no problem when her Hollywood friends treat women badly in a much more acute basis. For instance, she truly admires and supports Roman Polanski for being such a wonderful director and diffuses all discussions of his admitted-rapist status as “That’s not my business.” What is her business, however, is that Jodie (who, just like nearly every director out there, struggles to fund her art) feels really beaten down by the man as a female director. So naturally, she continues to support Mel Gibson, who actually beats women (such a nice symmetry there, right?) by sticking with him and proclaiming, “I will love this man for the rest of my life.” How would she feel if Mel punched a female director? That’s a question that shall remain unanswered, but Jodie’s merely sounding off on what actually affects her pocketbook. You know, other than the ill-advised decision to direct The Beaver:

In an era when women account for only 7% of the directors of Hollywood movies, Jodie Foster is the rare female whom financiers will back to helm any film, never mind a marketing challenge like “The Beaver,” her upcoming $20-million tragicomedy about depression starring Mel Gibson.

When asked about the industry statistics during a recent interview promoting “The Beaver,” Foster said she thought the low numbers of female directors were a result of studio executives’ fears of uncertainty.

“I don’t think it’s a plot and these guys sat around and said let’s keep these women out,” Foster said. “I think it’s like race psychology. When a producer hires a director, you’re hiring away your control completely. You’re bringing on somebody that will change everything. When you give that amount of power up, you want them to look like you and talk like you and think like you and it’s scary when they don’t, because what’s gonna happen? I’m gonna hand over $60 million to somebody I don’t know. I hope they look like me.”

When it was mentioned that many studio executives do, in fact, look like her — a 48-year-old white female veteran of the industry, Foster nodded. “And name the lists that come out of the female studio executives: guy, guy, guy, guy,” she said. “Their job is to be as risk-averse as possible. They see female directors as a risk.”

Foster got her first directing opportunity on 1991’s “Little Man Tate” from male executives at Orion Pictures. In 1989, she won the lead actress Academy Award for “The Accused.”

“I was acting in ‘Little Man Tate’ for almost no money and I had just won an Oscar,” said Foster. “They were under almost no financial risk whatsoever. The real pioneers are someone that didn’t have the ‘in’ that I had. I had guys who knew me. I was like their daughter.”

[From LA Times]

While I don’t have access to all of the male-to-female ratios of entering and graduating classes of accredited film schools, I’d be willing to wager that there isn’t some huge conspiracy at work involved at that level. The hard truth of the matter is that most film school grads, regardless of their sex, never get work as directors. Of course, a lot of directors (like Jodie) don’t go to film school at all and enter the profession after acting for a period of time before deciding, “[W]hat I really want to do is direct.” From there, it’s a matter of starting small and moving onto directing bigger films. So what I think is at work here, rather than what Foster is defensively labeling as “race psychology,” is that fewer women actually decide that they want to direct because, honestly, having a huge ego (and being stubborn enough to push past obstacles rather than whining about them) is part of the job. Even Woody Allen has a massive ego, and if Jodie truly believes that she’s the only director who’s had to start with small, low-risk pictures, well, she’s completely wrong about that. Even actors that move into directing (George Clooney, Ben Affleck, Zach Braff) have to start with little indie films, and they often appear in their own films too (something that Jodie complained about as an example of what she, as a female, had so suffer through), which in turn saves the studios money. No director starts out with blockbuster budgets; in fact, many of the large-scale directors like Michael Bay started out directing music videos. Jodie never had to do that.

Honestly, if Jodie Foster wants to start pullng the “race psychology” card, she needs to do two things: (1) Get her hands on real statistics and not assume that women have it harder because of her own path; and (2) Surround herself with allies that don’t include anti-Semetic rageaholics and child rapists who believe it is okay to sodomize a women even when she says “no.” Without further ado, let’s review this trailer for The Beaver, which pretty much says it all about Jodie’s inability to see the larger picture in the capacity of director:

fostergibson1

fosterpolanski1

fostergibson2

foster001

Photos courtesy of WENN and Fame Pictures

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

50 Responses to “Jodie Foster calls lower percentage of female directors “race psychology””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Rosanna says:

    What I love about Jodie is that she is able to love and appreciate people beyond their obvious shortcomings. Both Gibson and Polanski have them but one shouldn’t be unwise enough to judge a whole person and his entire life out of ONE thing wrong they did.

  2. the original bellaluna says:

    First of all: women are a “gender” not a “race.”

    Secondly: what’s wrong with “glass ceiling” or “boys’ club?” Not “dramatic” enough for an actor/director?

  3. Zoya says:

    What an out of touch idiot. she needs to educate herself about institutionalized sexism before she talks. people assumed she’s a classy person all these years because she’s had a long respected career on screen, but she has reveled her true colored in the last few years. and that picture of her with Roman Polanski IS SO FUCKING CREEPY.

  4. kazoo says:

    there’s something about her that’s always annoyed me.

  5. aenflex says:

    Like I said before, most of her comments make more sense to me if I picture them as coming from a man. A whiny man.

  6. Hollowdoll says:

    I used to love her, this bums me out.

  7. Whatever says:

    Her friends are irrelevant. Discrimation against women exists in all professions and the film industry is no exception. Women are paid less and promoted less frequently across the board. I have a friend who boasted to me after getting his first job as an engineer that he was getting $10K a year more than a female college grad hired on the same day, just for having a penis. The girl actually had better grades in college, but lacked an appendage that is apparently worth $10,000. I have yet to see one that is worth ten grand, but whatever.

  8. Solveig says:

    Fact is women have a hard time getting every kind of privileged position in any kind of jobs, generally speaking. And she has the right to talk about the issues she encounters when she’d love to direct a movie. HW is full of s*itty male directors but not full of s*itty female directors. That means that a woman must be really good or influent (or both) to get the money to do a film, while a man, well, must just be a man to get the money, I guess.
    Finally, enough already with this Polansky stuff. If it is a problem to the world that some actors support him*, tell me why people do pay to see his movies at the cinema, or Netflix or dvd. Are we supporting him as well?

    *As matter of fact none of those actors (Depp, Portman, Foster) has ever condoned his actions, they can’t just talk shit about him, and in their position I don’t know what I would do.
    (I wouldn’t probably work in showbiz)

  9. nnn says:

    She pisses me off. I don’t think she is cool anymore.

    And I agree with aenflex, she sounds like she lacks oestrogen and is full of testosteron.

    I agree that you have to side with your friends but I also beleive morally, a woman, especially should never side with someone who is a woman or a child abuser, especially the way she does it, so publicly vocal like she disrespect and dismiss the victim’s pain.

    She lacks of elegance, discretion and sensitivity in that regard.

  10. k says:

    @Rosanna: Both Gibson and Polanski did far more than one thing wrong apiece.

    It’s probably not a conspiracy, but it is a culture. The fact that her buddy Polanski (whose early films I adore) found it so easy to prey on young or underage women associated with show business says it all.

  11. MollyB says:

    No man beats a woman or sodomized a little girl just that ONE time. The fact that she would defend these men and then complain that women (directors) are being oppressed is disgusting.

  12. OriginalGracie says:

    When I first saw Silence Of The Lambs, I was so happy to see her character as a real woman. Meaning that she had hopes, dreams, aspirations and life goals that had nothing to do with taking her clothes off, showing cleavage, gittin’ herself a husband or any of that bullshit.

    I guess over the years I tended to view Jodie in the rosy glow of the Clarise Starling character. She is so private that few public details about her have ever emerged.

    With the coming out of her film it’s like suddenly I am deluged with Jodie’s feelings and I am appalled. Defending Polanski (who was once referred to as “the original five-foot pole you wouldn’t want to touch anyone with.”).

    Defending Mel Gibson and his racist, sexist, woman-hating diatribes.

    She is NOTHING like I imagined. Nothing. It makes me sad and angry.

    THIS is how dickheaded men get away with shit. Having women defend them.

  13. Bill Hicks is God says:

    That caption is misleading why, for more hits? It got me. She said “like race psychology” and was trying to draw a parallel…that went nowhere. She may be Ivy League-degreed but she obviously didn’t walk away educated.

    Just another insular, show-biz idiot trying to sound smart and keeping questionable company at the same time.

    Women like her are the very reason nobody takes feminism seriously. “Waah! It’s hard getting funding for a picture because I’m a woman…” as opposed to “I’m one of the female Wal-Mart employees bringing a class action to the Supreme Court for gender discrimination” Which one is the real feminist?

    Feminists don’t kiss male ass Jodie. Particularly not pedo/woman-beating ass.

    And you can hardly equate Hollywood with the world the rest of women live, advocate and die in because of it.

    Forceps stat! The head is not coming out of the ass.

  14. GradStudentEatingHotPockets says:

    *slams head on computer*
    Why can’t she just use the proper terms for what is happening instead of throwing out terms that will just get her noticed (and royally piss off people in the process that might support what she has to say if she worded it a different way)?

  15. Janna says:

    I love her. And spot on, Jodi.

  16. ! says:

    I’m very pleased with the community response on this one. As a feminist and a writer who works in a field particularly overwhelmed with immature boys, I’ve come to find that it’s more effective (and far less annoying) to, as someone said, push past an obstacle instead of whining about why it exists. I also find that being extremely arrogant and self assured has gotten me far.

  17. Ingrid says:

    Never a fan of Jodie, I found her to be fake, and this doesn’t help her image at all. She made friends with assholes, the very ones she’s generally bitching about. Shakes my head. She must not read up on herself very much, cause this latest statement makes her look ignorant. It’s okay for her to have these types of friends, lots of people in the world can forgive and forget – unless it happens to them, right? Which is what she’s basically saying. Because SHE had problems with that type of situation, it MUST require attention, but beat her ass or rape it…well, I’m sure she’d be bitching differently.

  18. djork says:

    Oh, come on. Jodie Foster can be annoying, but she’s right.

  19. Sumodo1 says:

    Anton Yelchin is in “The Beaver?”

  20. Janna says:

    !:, Well, I don’t consider her a whiner. Jodi has pushed past many obstacles and accomplished what few have in Hollyweird. She’s an accomplished actress, director, producer, and it’s pretty much known she’s a lesbian. But good for her for stating her opinion and not being afraid of the good ol’ boy network and keeping her “pretty little mouth” shut. It’s not like she addresses it every interview. This is the only time in all the interviews I’ve read from her over 15 plus years.

  21. original kate says:

    “one shouldn’t be unwise enough to judge a whole person and his entire life out of ONE thing wrong they did.”

    @ rosanna: if only it were just one. mel has done many things that decent people find revolting, including throwing racial and anti-semitic slurs at people, driving while drunk, cheating on his wife and beating up his girlfriend and threatening to kill her. how does that count as “ONE wrong thing” in your world? as for roman, i;m sure he raped more than one young, drunk girl, but even if that were the only thing it certainly speaks volumes about his character.

    MODS: can i please appeal to the CB gods and be taken off moderation? i’ve been on it for about a week. thanks.

  22. Liana says:

    The hard truth of the matter is that most film school grads, regardless of their sex, never get work as directors.
    * * * * *

    Absolutely correct. I have a masters in film. What am I doing? I’m a production assistant and a director’s assistant. I’m probably never going to direct a major motion picture in my lifetime.

  23. Bill Hicks is God says:

    Hi Liana, is your degree an MFA? “Film school” isn’t “Film study.” I just thought that was a distinction that needed to be made.

    I work at a postsecondary institution that solely teaches the academic study of film, we were one of the pioneers in doing so. What we teach is a discipline of the Humanities and we do not teach filmmaking or production.

    Studying film as text and the most important source of the “human record” in the 20th century does not equip one to be a filmmaker.

  24. Bill Hicks is God says:

    p.s. you are very lucky to get to do what you do. At least you are working in the industry and if that was you goal, kudos for that, honestly.

  25. JenJen says:

    The puppet….that is prizewinning.

  26. OXA says:

    Jodie just wants to stir up old crap so she gets press for the beaver movie. She is going for the sympathy vote to get people in seats supporting a female directed movie staring an ABUSIVE PIG and a beaver.

  27. Truthzbetta says:

    I agree with her on the problem that everything out there is made by men. It’s a problem, we are 50% of humanity and our highly visual culture is controlled by 93% men. It’s not good for how we get sexualized, and portrayed as being worth so little as we mature beyond their infantile male baby brain fantasies about what we should be.

    And historically it’s worse, there were 0% directors for decades so this long climb to a single digit and one Oscar is nothing to take lightly. Especially when you’re shooting off your ass, and “don’t have the statistics.” The statistics aren’t good and an insider is trying to explain the mentality she deals with to you.

    That said, I cannot believe that she doesn’t find Polanski– the rapist who admits on t.v. with Charlie Rose he has a thing for 13 year olds and did rape one– morally repugnant. Pederanski is so part of the problem.

  28. Anna says:

    Not commenting on whether Foster is the person to talk about this or whether she’s committed some sort of double standard I believe that even if Arts schools have a 50/50 gender split in directing / film / whatever, the truth is that 90% of directors that get signed onto do major motion pictures with major production companies are men. There’s really no denying that.

    Also, how many female directors can an average person name? 1, 2 possibly 3? Male directors, you’d get at least 10 (at least if you watch any films at all and have a decent memory).

  29. Kim says:

    She is 100% right. BUT it pains me she is backing Mel Gibson in anything. He has done more to set women back than almost any other actor! So in this case she comes off like a hypocrite.

  30. Mika says:

    I think Jodie is an idiot for being friends with Polanski and Gibson, but that doesn’t mean I disagree that female directors have to work harder then their male counterparts. When I went to an all girl’s school, I wrote and directed a lot for our drama program. When I went to university, some people were really uncomfortable with me directing anything. It didn’t matter how polite and subdued I was, as soon as I gave anyone direction I was a crazy bitch or worse…”feisty”. I tried to role with it and have a sense of humour, but when I overheard one of my cast members mention that I was being a “crazy bitch who needed a good dicking” I embraced my bitch, and banned him from the set until he apologised. He didn’t, so I had to replace him. So yeah, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that being a female director is hard.

  31. ZenB says:

    I can’t take any person seriously who supports Polanski. I am (barely)old enough to remember the case. I was about half the age of the victim. I wasn’t sure what was going on. It was the 70s and a lot of S#it went down in the 70s that we wouldn’t condone now (ex: Melanie Griffith moving in with Don Johnson at 14) He followed up by hooking up with 16 year old Nastassia Kinski so it was a pattern for him and his eurobuddies. So obviously HE thought he did nothing wrong.

    What I am sure that Polanski is a gutless coward who won’t face the piper for what was decided he did. He was NOT convicted of child rape or any kind of forcible or coercive rape. He was convicted for having sex with a minor. He didn’t even have the guts to spend time in jail for that? I don’t think the penalty was that high in the 70s. Spousal rape had barely been recognized in the 70s. Chicken! I have no respect for anyone who will not take responsibility for his actions.

    As for Mel Gibson, he is an even more repugnant human being than Polanski, IMHO. Polanski never pretended to be a good person, he never pretended to be moral or religious or anything else. Mel Gibson cheats on his wife (more than once), gets drunk off his @$$ and calls every race and religion other than his own names. He said odious things to this woman that he chose to be the mother of his 87th child – by having unsafe sex with her – he’s obsessed with blow jobs, he likely slapped her around and he claims to be a devout and extreme Catholic? WTF? I hate hypocrites even more than I hate cowards.

    And Jodie – maybe your movies suck? There is a glass ceiling in everything. Stop complaining and break it. Yes we have to be better than they are but we usually are anyway so break the ceiling.

  32. kgq says:

    it is about sexism
    it is about resources and who has access to them.

  33. kgq says:

    hallelujah @ truthzbetta

  34. Str8Shooter says:

    As a gay man (and even more so, a HUMAN BEING) I absolutely LOATHE people like Jodie Foster who would defend a homophobic, racist, misogynistic scumbag like Gibson…and on top of that, a RAPIST like Polanski. And she’s gonna bitch about women having it so ‘tough’ in Hollywood?

    Gee, Jodie. You have no issues with someone who BEATS or RAPES women, yet you take ‘the man’ to task for keeping you down in the film industry?

    Pardon me, but aren’t you releasing a movie some time this year???

  35. fizXgirl314 says:

    wow, you people are coming down pretty hard on Foster. She’s one of the few women who has broken through barriers and is setting a great example. Chill the eff out. We should be proud of her for her achievements, not nitpicking her every word.

    Quite frankly, I think one of the main reasons women don’t have a heavy impact on some fields is because of the lack of role models. There was a study done that showed women in science and math classes would interact more and become more involved if the teacher was a female. They were essentially less intimidated and being able to see a reflection of themselves in someone successful helped them to believe that they could succeed as well. There’s also a really good example of this sort of thing happening in physics. For instance, there’s a disproportionately large number of females in astrophysics than in any other type of physics. Moreover, there are more female astrophysicists studying black holes than anything else. One major reason it’s believed this is the case is because some of the leading researches in black holes are women.

    Anyway, my point being that Jodie Foster makes a good argument. People just haven’t “seen” women in certain roles so they are less likely to trust them. People like her who are going against the grain serve as a great example for other women. I think it’s spectacular.

  36. Anti-icon says:

    I think she’s right in what she says. I am, however, somewhat baffled by the use of the word tragicomedy. I really hope that word doesn’t bring forward a new genre of film. Tragedy is rarely comedic, and it does require a skillful writer and director to pull it off. We’ll see if The Beaver measures up. (I have a feeling it will be similar in feel to Lars and The Real Girl, which was very good, I thought.)

  37. Hana says:

    She is the same hypocrite like Gibson

  38. Liana says:

    @Bill Hicks is God: I have an MFA in filmmaking from Tisch (NYU)

  39. Jenn says:

    If Jodie Foster were a man, she would have the biggest boys club mentality, just because she could. The subject of gender power-discrepancies in Hollywood and the reasons behind them?– If she were a man those questions wouldn’t even cross her mind. She can’t see further than her Roman Polanski and Mel Gibson t-shirts. If she’s in a film, I have to *love* whoever else is in it to watch. I don’t get the people who think she seems so smart let alone emotionally compelling as an actress. There’s an acting feel to her acting.

  40. Jenn says:

    @fizXgirl-She doesn’t use her power in a way that benefits other women. She’s all about her own accomplishments-She uses it to benefit herself and only speaks up about womens issues if she’s personally affected. So people are turned off by that typer person and rightly so. She holds up the boys club “protect Polanski and Gibson” status quo…why? Because they are both in that club, and she would like to be.

    But re your point about lack of female role models playing a big part ITA.

  41. Kim says:

    She used to be such a role model but seems to have lost it in recent yrs. Supporting Gibson and Polanski. The 2 men who have treated women like crap, 1 who hits women and calls them obscene names and the other on the lamb from doing his jail time! How hypocritical of her!

  42. Ellie says:

    I totally agree and I find it extremely disappointing. Have always been a huge fan of hers and now not so much.

  43. Runs with Scissors says:

    I just wrapped on a film I Directed. Taking a day to recover, actually. She is absolutely right. Discrimination against female Directors is mostly tied to risk assessment (and good old fashioned sexism) and that risk assessment is similar to “race psychology.” Basically, people trust those who are most similar to themselves and hence discriminate against those who aren’t.

    Kaiser, saying that there are so few female Directors in the business because they just don’t choose it (because their egos aren’t strong enough, really?) is frankly ridiculous. There are so few female Directors because of attitudes like yours that assume women can’t handle it, so they aren’t willing to “risk” a project on them. Trust me, there are plenty of us who push through obstacles instead of just “whine about them,” lol, Christ.

    Being a female Director is HARD. There is always someone waiting to knock you down, to comment on your looks or act surprised that you know your way around a camera, (or usually annoyed by this). It’s not impossible, just difficult. We need to SUPPORT women who’ve done it, not bash them, and certainly not promote the same stupid stereotypes that are used as an excuse to keep us down.

    I HATE Polanski, but I think she’s making a simple distinction between assessing him as an artist and judging him as a person. The way I understand it, she’s opted not to publicly judge him as a person from the perspective of Jodie Foster, the Director/Actor. She and Mel go way back, she’s chosen not to abandon him. Her choice.

    I have great respect for her. We need more women like her in the field.

    @fizXgirl314 and Whatever, rock on.

  44. lucy2 says:

    I give her credit for all that she’s accomplished, and I think she’s a great actress. But her public support of those two particular men really disappoints.
    In most industries, the CEOs are still usually men, but like many of those fields, it seems like women in the film industry might slowly be making some progress. A female director finally won an Oscar (for a war movie, no less), a few like Nancy Meyers and Nora Ephron have had some big box office successes, and some of the younger generations like Drew Barrymore and Sofia Coppola are producing and directing. Progress is slow, but I think the best thing is to just keep plugging away at it, doing the small films, etc.

  45. Becky says:

    I’ve read speculation about Mel Gibson being the sperm donor/biological father of Jodie’s kids and if that’s true then it helps to understand why she defends him.

    As much as I find Mel Gibson and his behavior repugnant, in a weird way I admire Jodie for so steadfastly standing by her friend. Loyalty appears to be a rare quality in Hollywood. Mel Gibson should be extremely thankful for having someone so loyal in his life.

  46. LittleDeadGirl says:

    First of all, if that one thing is raping someone, than yeah, I’m gonna judge you as a person. I won’t judge your art because many writers (artists directors ect) wrote beautiful things while being damaged and terrible people but it doesn’t mean I’m not gonna judge you.

    Second, while it’s true women are still being discriminated against in my opinion whinning about it does no one any favors. If we keep getting educated, doing our own thing, working, and progressing we’re gonna get there. I think if she wanted to do something positive she should use her status and money (I assume she’s made a bundle of her movies … maybe not) to help other women become directors. You don’t need a big budget to make a great movie that will move people.

  47. Crash2GO2 says:

    @Jenn: Wonderful comments, and I think you are spot on. Jodie is annoyed that she is a woman more than anything else IMO.

  48. riri says:

    As sick as I feel about her support of Gibson and the likes, she is more that right and has a very valid point.

    Most women in Hollwood would just keep quiet so they will get work and won’t be perceived as “trouble-makers”.

    If all women will keep quiet nothing will ever change- so kudos to her for speaking out.

    Where are all the rest of the brave women of Hollywood?
    They all want to be play strong women, but only on the big screen. Never in real life.

  49. Bill Hicks is God says:

    @ fizXgirl314: “She’s one of the few women who has broken through barriers and is setting a great example.”

    What? She’s not Rosa Parks for godssakes.

    What “real life” barriers has she broken through? She never even cracked open the door of the Closet until she had directorial success.

    @ Lianna: Excellent school 🙂

  50. tracking says:

    This is a Yale alumna? Ugh.