Did Justin Theroux spend $15K on a Tiffany’s love token for Jennifer Aniston?

These are some new photos of Jennifer Aniston and Jason Sudeikis filming We’re the Millers in Albuquerque, NM. This film production has been all over the place, right? And it keeps going and going. It’s not like they’re making Citizen Kane or anything. Hopefully, they’ll be wrapping this up in the next few weeks, because otherwise… it just seems weird that they would be working this much on what seems like a dumb comedy. As for Aniston’s facial expressions, she’s sort of cracking me up. I don’t know if she was being photographed while “acting” in a scene, or if she’s being given some piece of direction or what.

In other Aniston news, last week’s National Enquirer claimed that Jennifer might be getting a very special engagement present from Justin Theroux. Who she pretty much hasn’t seen since they got engaged a month ago.

JENNIFER Aniston is set to get a big, expensive present from fiancé Justin Theroux if this latest report is to be believed.

According to American tabloid the National Enquirer, the actor and writer paid a visit to a Beverly Hills Tiffany’s after a business lunch looking to find a gift for the actress, and immediately fell for a beautiful platinum heart pendant covered with sparkling sapphires.

“Justin thought the necklace was a couple of thousand – and went into shock when the saleswoman told him it was just more than $15,000,” a source said.

“He took a big gulp, pondered a minute, then said, ‘Oh what the hell!’

“He told the woman to wrap the bauble, saying he’d save it for a special occasion.”

[From Showbiz Spy]

I know exactly the Tiffany’s pendant that they’re discussing. It’s a beautiful piece that I daydream about constantly. At the end of the day, I’d probably prefer the Tiffany sapphire (or diamond!) encrusted teardrop though. Anyway, I think it’s a little bit weird that Justin shelled out however much for Jennifer’s engagement ring (which we still haven’t seen) and then immediately went shopping for another piece of jewelry for Jennifer. Sure, some men are like that – wonderful men who love to give jewelry! But is Justin one of those dudes? It seems out of character for this hipster.

And here’s the latest St. Jude’s Hospital ad, which includes many celebrities singing “Hey Jude”. Jennifer is in there, as is Jon Hamm and Keith Urban, etc.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

39 Responses to “Did Justin Theroux spend $15K on a Tiffany’s love token for Jennifer Aniston?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Amelia says:

    Hmm, I’m going to have to hunt for a link for this ‘token’… I can’t find it on the UK site which I keep getting redirected to.
    Quick question – Is St Jude’s essentially the Stateside equivelent of GOSH? (Great Ormand Street Hospital). Loving that video.
    And slightly off topic, but what with all these celebrity engagements going on and my being stuck in bed and high on sugar, I happened to wander over to the Tiffany site and saw the ring of my very best floating-on-a-cloud-with-Cumberbatch-and-Hiddleston-dreams. Ah, Tiffany’s … why must you be so far out of my price range?

  2. cmc says:

    Is $15k even that much to celebrities?

    • LittleFATMe says:

      I would guess that it’s not that much to her, but to him would be a bit of a bigger deal. Also, while I like to fantasize about the shopping I would do if I was a kabillionair, I think I would always go into sticker shock! lol I think that happens to even the rich and semi-famous. (Or is he famous?)

    • Amelia says:

      Faux-hipsters don’t use *money* you know. They pay in angst, crappy songs and brooding bullsh*t.

    • Saphana says:

      depends on the celeb :)

      though jewelery is some kind of investment, if your currency goes downhill you will lose money but jewelery will always be worth something.

  3. muffin says:

    in the picture where you can see her shadowed eye lids, she looks SO DAMN OLD! ugh

  4. Kim says:

    Has she bought her engagement ring yet? JK

  5. Lady_Luck says:

    “So damn old”? What are you, fifteen?


    zip it, teenybopper. I’m 32, still quite young, but when I get to Jen’s age, I would LOVE to look as “old” as her.

    • truthSF says:

      She does look at least 10 years older then she used to look last year. Like something really stressful took it’s toll on her. And at 32, I hope I dont look like her when I get her age. My mother is 56, had 9 kids, and face wise, looks younger then Ms. Aniston. Her body on the other hand, is the opposite of Aniston. it’s expected with

      • EmmaStoneWannabe says:

        +1 I dont think she looks “old” per se…but she is looking older than her usual in these pics. Was beginning to think she defied aging altogether. Nice to see she is “normal” lol

      • Janet says:

        Decades of smoking and tanning are finally taking their toll on her face and she’s looking her age, but 43 is not “so damn old”. Her body is still good for her age.

      • muffin says:

        i didn’t say 43 was old. I said SHE looked old (so damn old, to be exact). I guess i should have qualified that by saying – “so much damn older (than usual).” I apologize.

      • Maggi says:

        It’s the Botox that is making her look older

    • truthSF says:

      She does look at least 10 years older then she used to look last year. Like something really stressful took it’s toll on her. And at 32, I hope I dont look like her when I get her age. My mother is 56, had 9 kids, and face wise, looks younger then Ms. Aniston. Her body on the other hand, is the opposite of Aniston. expected with

  6. mln76 says:

    Great video for St Judes….now that I’ve said something nice I believe she officially has Botox face in these pics probably because she lost some weight in her face the work is showing.

  7. Jayna says:

    His off and on longterm girlfriend must be reeling about the engagement, but this is what happens many times when you date and live with someone so long term without a commitment. They get engaged quickly with the next woman.

    • Thalia says:

      They were not ‘off and on’, that was a tabloid lie.

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      How do you know Justin Theroux and Heidi Bivens didn’t have a commitment? Not only had they been together for 14 years, they lived together for the last 6 of those 14 years. Living with someone is a commitment, isn’t it? Both parties have to want and agree to it, or it doesn’t happen.

      And we haven’t seen an engagement ring yet.

  8. anom says:

    they don’t call her fugiston for nothing.

  9. Toot says:

    Sweet commercial. The people who sang were cute, no comment on JA.

  10. epiphany says:

    I think the problem is the cosmetic work she’s had done to look longer is having the opposite effect. She has a ton of fillers in her face, and now her skin looks like Silly Putty. She’s also had collagen injected in her lips – she has that typical duckbill look to her upper lip, a dead giveaway.

  11. mnbvc says:

    She really shouldn’t make those stupid facial expressions. They make her look uglier than usual.

    That first pic really emphasizes the fact she does not have a nice face.

    There are many beautiful women in Hollywood, and she is NOT one of them.

    • Joyce says:


      She doesn’t have a pretty face. She should thank god for her millions. Without her hair & body, she looks worse than any regular woman.

    • Veruca says:


      This, exactly.

      I’ve wanted to say something similar, but was afraid of being blasted. I just don’t get the appeal of Aniston beyond the whole Brad/Angelina thing (which has gotten old and boring).

      As Joyce said, she should thank God. She’s one lucky lady, considering that’s she’s mediocre on so many levels (looks, acting ability, choice of friends).

    • Janet says:

      I wouldn’t call her ugly but she’s become very ordinary-looking. She used to be passably pretty at best and now she looks like any suburban hausfrau.

      I think what really killed her looks was too much tanning. Her skin looks like cured rawhide.

      • Joyce says:

        I wouldnt call her ugly either. If it wasn’t for Friends ( a hit show), she wouldnt have make the money she made. And w/that money she was able to transformed herself into the girl next door. There are many actresses who are lot more prettier than this woman.

  12. Mac says:

    If I were a celebrity I would have demanded to participate in that video.

  13. EmmaStoneWannabe says:

    IMHO, she peaked during ‘Friends’ ..haven’t enjoyed her movies..well except maybe for ‘Marley and Me’..mainly bc of Owen Wilson and the dog though.

  14. Kim says:

    She has looked that way for awhile in candid pics but she usually has her hair,scarf,etc partially covering her face.Also we are used to seeing photoshopped pics from magazines these are paparrazi shots.According to paparazzi website they are still trying to get a pic of the engaged couple and the ring

  15. KellyinSeattle says:

    How long are they going to be filming this movie? Is it War and Peace?

  16. The Original Mia says:

    Thor 2 has finished principal shooting and they are still at this thing. Goodness. What in the hell are they shooting?

    As for the Tiffany pendant, I’m sure it’s gorgeous. Still don’t believe this engagement is real, but whatever…not in the mood to debate with her fans today.

  17. blonde on the dock says:

    She looked gorgeous in the ad. I dont think she’d still be making movies and the kind of money she does if she were a hasbeen. I like her.

  18. bELLA says:


  19. Sugar says:

    It’s a step in the right direction. I’m guessing those matching name rings they wore during their infatuation stage wore off. my thought when I first saw them was this girl is head over hipster boots in love with this boy to even have sported it on her finger as long as
    she did in public & photographed-those silly