Jennifer Aniston in ‘vintage’ John Galliano at the SAGs: sexy or dated?

wenn22109036

There’s some debate in the fashion industry as to when you can label something “vintage”. Some people use “vintage” as a descriptor for any article of clothing that is more than a few years old, like a short-hand for saying “this isn’t fresh off the runway.” Some believe that something can only be labeled vintage after a certain amount of time has passed, like, say, 20 years. Jennifer Aniston described her SAG Awards dress as “vintage Galliano.” It’s from 1998. What do you think? Seventeen years old… is it really vintage? Also, I think it’s interesting that it’s from that particular year. 1998 was Jennifer’s hey-day and the year she started dating Brad Pitt. Coincidence?! (Probably.)

So, what are your thoughts? The first thing I saw when Aniston and Justin Theroux hit the red carpet was her cleavage. It’s like she’s doubling-down on her bra-hatred, especially after she received criticism for her saggy appearance at the Critics’ Choice. I’ll give her this: her cleavage didn’t look as saggy at the SAGs. Still, I wish would find a dress with more support, or just stop with the LOOK AT MY BODY LOOK AT MY HAIR routine. The dress itself is okay – I like that she didn’t wear black, and the gold set off her hair and her tan.

Her jewelry is by Fred Leighton. I didn’t know Fred Leighton made body chains, but sure. This whole thing just reminds me of how dated Jennifer can be with her styling. She loves body chains, toe rings, and the same haircut she’s had since 1995. It’s like we’re about to do Jell-O shots and listen to Chumbawamba. As for Justin Theroux… The Eyebrow was looking sweaty. Apparently, it was very warm on that red carpet. I hope he was wearing deodorant.

FFN_RIJ_SAG2015_SET2_012515_51636103

wenn22109733

FFN_RIJ_SAG2015_SET2_012515_51636114

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

337 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston in ‘vintage’ John Galliano at the SAGs: sexy or dated?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Minty says:

    I think she looked amazing.

    • tinytara says:

      Damn, ‘girls got one hell of a great bod!

      • perplexed says:

        I’m younger than her and her body looks way better than mine. I’ve not had kids either. I’d be happy to have her physique at my younger age.

        I suppose any dress worn by these celebrities could be fitted better, but the actual body looks more than good enough to me.

      • FLORC says:

        I’m not going to pick her body apart.
        IMO her body is ok. There’s really nothing special. Great for her age, but overall? Meh. Maybe my area is riddled with fit women in their 40′s and I expect more? Very possible.
        Katherine is correct about something. Simply speaking from proportions, Aniston doesn’t have a curvy figure. She’s slim and toned, but her hips to waist can seem boxy without the right pose or accent like a belt.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @FLORC, who wrote: “Katherine is correct about something. Simply speaking from proportions, Aniston doesn’t have a curvy figure. She’s slim and toned, but her hips to waist can seem boxy without the right pose or accent like a belt.”

        And ‘that’ is called the Stumpy.

      • DrM says:

        She looks fantastic and the dress looks well on her too. There is NOTHING wrong with the her breasts. They are in fantastic shape for ANY age. Watch some 70′s pr0n…you know the time BEFORE plastic and silicone…

    • lana86 says:

      cute

    • hadlyB says:

      Her body is yes. And you can see she is not wearing spanx. No bumps, ridges, bulges – nothing. It’s amazing.

      Her hair is bleh, but her dress just doesn’t seem to suit her though. But damn, her body looks good!

      • Judyk says:

        First time I’ve EVER thought she looks FANTASTIC!

        (Again clicked in the wrong spot–was responding to Minty.)

      • T.C. says:

        For me it’s the opposite. This is the first time I think her body game is off. She looks boxy and shapeless. The tan and plain dress and Rachel hair makes her look so dated and not as young vibrant as she usually does. Justin just looks like her gay BFF she brought to keep her entertained. After her THR comments about him I’m starting to see it now as a boarding relationship that is beneficial to both.

      • FLORC says:

        T.C.
        She has been hitting some kind of fillers or tox. Though I think it’s settled at this point.
        Thin is Aniston could nail a look. When she goes a little more brown it compliments her color and features better. And when she wears colors she looks amazing.
        This dress looks desperate and a bit dated.
        Confidence is sexy. The neckline and chain to draw the eye there seems more deperate than confident.

      • glynda says:

        Oh please. Low bar yet again. Kathy Griffin has a nice body, better than aniston’s…and she’s older. Even her abhorrent boozy bestie Handler has a nice bod. She gets praise for the stupidest most normal ish – y’all act like she’s j.lo or even courtney cox..who puts her to shame.

      • Ennie says:

        Kathy does have an amazing enviable body.

    • kennedy says:

      I was so distracted by how orange Justin looked during the opening sequence (where she spoke). Like, he was straight up a oompa loompa. He just grosses me out.

      But yes, I thought she looked amazing. Boring and predictable but amazing nonetheless.

    • Lahdidahbaby says:

      Great color on her, makes her skin and hair look especially good. I think it would have been a perfect look for her if not for the visible panties, front and back (fleshtone would have avoided that) and the amount of boobage this dress exposed. Girl’s got a KILLER body.

      • Becky1 says:

        I agree. I would have liked the dress more if it wasn’t so sheer and if the V neck wasn’t quite as deep. It would be sexy but not quite so overt. She still has a great body.

        I don’t get the comments about her hair being the same as it was in 1995. That’s not really true. In 1995 she had “the Rachel” (mid-length layered shag). Yeah, she’s had a similar look for the most part over the years but she’s mixed it up periodically.

      • FLORC says:

        Becky1
        Aniston has said she hated the “Rachel” hair style and never grew to like it. She has however kept her special stylist who keeps her hair that same tone of gold/sunkissed once she found it during that era. That’s what it means. Not the hair style most commonly associated with her character. The one she had during that era of her own life.
        When she trimmed her hair not too long ago after it was damaged from styling it looked great! But she later aded extensions to make it look as it was.

    • Hily fH says:

      Nice see-through bottom. Next time make the top see-through too, Jenny.

      • Marshmellow says:

        You can see her underwear thru her dress! HOW is that attractive??

      • anne_000 says:

        She’s had so much experience on the red carpet, you’d think she’d know by now what’s see through and what’s not. You’d also think she would know what type of underwear to wear under sheer clothing, especially not to wear bold white panties/thongs under darker, sheer clothing.

        One would *almost* think she did this on purpose if one thought she were a desperate, attention-crazy, panderer to whatever publicity she can get…*cough*…

    • Susiecue says:

      I am divided here. First off I like the color, and like some of you have said its SO NICE to see her actually wearing color, ever. I like the back. I agree her boobs aren’t as cringey as the SAGs (unfortunate irony), and her hair and makeup are nice. Face doesn’t look too jacked.

      BUT. It really isn’t flattering. It does make her look boxy. Her boobs ARE still pancakey, in some pics more than others. I don’t want to see her thong.. Hey, overall I’d call it a win. Who am I kidding I’d adore myself in anything if I were as hot as her.

    • Cali2002 says:

      YES! Her body looks amazing and the dress really compliments her curves, she needs to show JLo how to look hot without looking desperate with an open mouth.Go Jen, may I have her body at 40 whatever.

  2. Francesca says:

    Thong-th-th-th-thong. Eww. Tacky.

    • Zandy says:

      OMG! You’re right that is disgusting!

    • The Wizz says:

      Same, gonna say nice G string.

    • LadyMTL says:

      Hahahahaha I didn’t even notice it at first but now that’s all I can see. Seriously, you’d think her stylist would have been able to get a thong that matched her skin tone (or better yet, have taken a pic before letting her walk out the door).

      • sug#1 says:

        Yeah….no….pretty sure her stylist (is her name Jen) planned this shade of undies & Jen signed off on it.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Yeah, you can see it from the front, too. Nice.

    • Kimmy says:

      Right?!

    • Mia V. says:

      I thought it was nice until I saw her underwear.

    • Shahrizai says:

      i just noticed that was wondering if the entire dress was basically see through? Why not wear nude undies and skip the peepshow? It totally looks like it was done purposely to show that she isn’t wearing spanks. Which is great! She has a great body and I’m down for her showcasing that, but white undies under a gold dress to an awards ceremony? Please.

    • Sarah says:

      I saw it too. But hey – she shows she’s not wearing a bit of Spanx, right? LOL!

    • Dani says:

      I’m almost sure its part of the body chain that goes down her naval. It’s a body chain, hence it having to go around something, usually the body.

    • Josephine says:

      Now that’s all I can see. Wouldn’t nude-colored under garments be the natural choice? White??!!

    • TheOnlyDee says:

      I hate when you see undies under a dress. It ruins the whole thing. Hello butt cheeks!

    • Pandy says:

      White thong, no bra. She’s not doing her girls any favors.

    • Ms. Lib says:

      Really? You can see her white underwear. Who is helping her get dressed? She needs a mother who will be honest and let her know, “Honey, I can see your underwear!”

    • Kosmos says:

      Yes, her thong is showing through both in front and back–was this intentional? Hmmm. Actually, she can pull off this dress color, it looks nice on her, but I am in agreement with Kaiser about the boob thing—please please do not show us your hanging boobies! She could still have a low cut V but support the boobies a little and this dress will look so much better.

    • Blackcat says:

      +1000

  3. Someonestolemyname says:

    No matter how many V Necks she wears, she’ll never too Kate Hudson in that white body,body,body dress.

    Tired of seeing Jen’s saggy swinging doors.

    Her hair looks good though.

    • Gea says:

      Jennifer looks same to me what ever she wears , perhaps her hair or make up needs to be updated. As for deep V décolletage, it looks unflattering on her . Also, many ladies can’t pool that look successfully.

      • Someonestolemyname says:

        Yes very few can wear that low V and pull it off. Jen needs to dress for her body. Her body is great, but those low V tops, just accentuate boob droop and the thing is her body is great, but those super low V open necks don’t work on her.

        Kate Hudson looks great in the low V and so does JLO when she wears it. JLAW too.

      • epiphany says:

        Or better yet, how about she dresses for her age, which, I hate to inform her, is not 25 any longer. How about shooting for elegance and class instead of trying to win a skin exposure competition? Mature women bring so much more to the table than just a nice figure – I wish she would realize that, accept her age, and revel in it.

      • Olga says:

        Totally. She is always the same.

      • Tilewa says:

        +1000 the dress makes her look boxy not shapely

    • Jen says:

      saggy?! her breasts look fabulous! obvious she hasn’t breastfed babies for years. Unreal, how distorted society’s view of the body has become.

      • hadlyB says:

        We are too used to seeing high profile implants on everyone. Where there is upper pole fullness on a constant basis. It’s annoying.

      • Kitten says:

        Seriously. If my boobs are that “saggy” at age 45 I’ll be pretty f*cking happy.

      • Artemis says:

        There are some pics of her floating on the net of her naked breasts. I am guilty of having looked at them but goddamn her boobs are amazing. They’re Miley Cyrus-level of perkiness and petite.

        Her boobs are clearly natural and it helps that she never had major weight fluctuations or breastfed so yeah, her breasts (and body) are awesome.

        And I love her look. It’s something different and it’s actually quite cool.

      • Rachel says:

        That’s it exactly. I’m quite tired of seeing her boobs, but saggy they are NOT. They’re real. And real boobs don’t stand at attention on your chest. We’re just too used to seeing gravity defying implants and sadly, that is becoming the norm.

      • TeresaMaria says:

        She has amazing boobs for a woman of her age. I would be happy to own her pair. But regardless to that, this is not a good look. If the cleavage was not so wide and deep, it would have been so much better. She would never get the J.Lo or Kate Hudson level of effect with her cleavage-choices.

      • Jayna says:

        Preach. Her boobs are great.

      • mia girl says:

        I think her boobs look fantastic. I don’t think they sag, they just aren’t bolted on by a plastic surgeon.

        And I respectfully disagree with the notion that she should “dress for her age” She’s 45 not 75. Plus I’m not sure that only young women corner the market on red carpet cleavage. Just ask the lovely Helen Mirren.

        On the snarky side, her energy last night seemed off. It seemed like neither she nor Theroux wanted to be there.

      • Beth says:

        Her breasts look fine. Further, I have worked in department stores and assisted stylists for major events– lots of young women have breasts like hers. Lots. Sag like hers is natural and her body overall looks very fit too. Plus, she has never had kids, which can be the real culprit for sag. Sure, you have women like that Emily Ratak-whatever girl who are known for high, perky ones, but those are rarer. Aniston’s body looks fine and people are throwing shade because a.) she is 45 and we as a society have an urge to tell women her age to cover up and act matronly and b.) it is Jennifer Aniston.

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        I agree – we’re just so used to the unnatural look of implants that we can’t seem to accept natural breasts anymore. Her breasts aren’t in the least saggy – just naturally full. Fuller, probably, than this gown was designed for.

        Her body is really amazing. For any age.

      • Isa says:

        I agree, the lady will be 46 next month. To me they look great and I don’t even care for the lady.

      • glynda says:

        Artemis apparently hasn’t seen the topless pics from The Breakup. Perky wouldn’t describe them. Nipples the size of golf balls on very large saucers. Also I’ve heard for years that Aniston had saline implants. Given her penchant for cosmetic ‘improvements,’ I wouldn’t be surprised.

      • katie says:

        “…Unreal, how distorted society’s view of the body has become.”
        It’s not about a problem with THE body. It’s because it’s HER body that they have a problem with it.

        @Beth
        “..Aniston’s body looks fine and people are throwing shade because a.) she is 45 and we as a society have an urge to tell women her age to cover up and act matronly and b.) it is Jennifer Aniston.”
        B for the win please!

      • Katherine says:

        Everyone seems to be forgetting her breast enhancement from years ago when it was very obvious she had implants. Unfortunately Aniston displays her near naked body in many poses so when she got her implants it was obvious that her breasts had been enlarged – and, no, she hadn’t gained any weight that would have increased her breasts.

        I think people may be unaware that not all women get round implants.

      • Lauren says:

        Some women have boobs with natural upper pole fullness. The ideal in plastic surgery is usually derived from the ideal in nature you know.

    • Maria says:

      They’re far from swinging 😒

      Nothing like body shaming on a Monday morning tho I guess…

      Her body looks great, no spanx either, that’s amazing (I say this while eating a cinnamon roll 😁).

    • Onthefly says:

      That’s body shaming and its not ok. Besides, what if her breasts are saggy?! (which they are not).She seems to be confident in her skin and thats what matters. Calling her breasts “swinging doors” perpetuates unattainable expectations. She’s 46 and her chest is all natural. I’ve noticed your constant criticism of Jennifer Aniston and its fine that you don’t like her. BUT its not ok for you to body shame her. Women come in all shapes and sizes; you need to respect that.

  4. Cleveland Girl says:

    At least she is wearing underwear. She looks pretty good.

    • AG-UK says:

      That’s what I was thinking. I think no matter what she does/wears people will have a point of view. I don’t follow her but I guess she is going to work that body until she can’t.

  5. Esmom says:

    Love the print, love the view from the back, overall a lovely look. And I think if it’s from before 2000, it can be called vintage.

    • Senaber says:

      IN US, vintage is technically only applied to items that are between 20-99 years old. Antiques must be 100+ years old. Anything that is 1-19 years old is “unsellable junk.” :-)
      Love, your friendly Etsy vintage store owner

      • Esmom says:

        Thank you for the clarification. She’s close with this dress, needs only a few more years! Although I’d hardly call it “junk.”

        Another benchmark — I’m involved in historic preservation and generally a building won’t be considered for landmark status until it’s 50 years old.

      • Bridget says:

        The term is thrown around a bit less on the red carpet after the Reese Witherspoon debacle where she thought she was wearin vintage Chanel but it was only a few years old… and had been worn by Kirsten Dust when it was actually current.

      • Jayna says:

        Right. A 17-year-old Galliano gown is used, unsellable junk. LOL

      • Senaber says:

        I wasn’t describing her dress as junk. I was making a joke that I can’t sell anything under 20 years old as vintage on Etsy, therefore it is “junk” to me. Sorry if I was unclear.

        I actually kind of like the dress on Jen, but enough with the body chains. Stop trying to make body chains happen, Jen. It’s not going to happen.

  6. alreadyready says:

    Am I seeing her underware? Sort of white mall parties?

    • ORLY says:

      That’s the first thing I noticed. Her underwear is on display.

      • Kitten says:

        Really? Wow. Her boobs were the first thing I noticed.
        I can’t be the only one right?

      • mimif says:

        The first thing I noticed was The Wax Figure Formerly Known As Justin Theroux.

      • ORLY says:

        Hah, didn’t really notice her boobs, they’re almost always out there so it’s like “tuning them out”. I was looking at the dress and saw the undies, then the body chain. I’m weird like that. 😏

  7. Charlotte says:

    Jennifer Anniston has an amazing figure, so why is she trying to look… Like she doesn’t? Also, maybe time to stop flashing?

    • Josephine says:

      I agree. This dress just doesn’t flatter, no matter how much folks are defending her all-natural breasts, I am always amazed at how a little bit more fabric could have made the dress so much better. I think her lack of support also makes her waist look thicker.

      I love the idea of the dress, but the execution was just so-so.

      • LT says:

        Agree. She isn’t curvy enough to carry this off – if you are going to wear a dress like this that emphasizes the hips, you need a smaller waist. She has looked better in other stuff.

  8. blu_ says:

    The term vintage can also be used when referring to something exemplary of the best period of a creator’s work.

  9. bellie says:

    talk about the SAG awards. heh.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      Lol.

    • Anny says:

      For someone in her mid forties she looks absolutely amazing. And her girls are in pretty good condition given her age. I like it.

      • Someonestolemyname says:

        Her body is fantastic, but she’s wearing things that draw attention to the wrong area. V’s that low no longer work on her.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Really. She has a beautiful body. Just gorgeous, but that low V is so unflattering to her breasts. It’s the first thing you notice. Even before the fact that her underpants are completely visible. Mirrors? Does anyone have mirrors?

      • Esmom says:

        I don’t know why I feel constantly compelled to defend her around here but I’m guessing the white didn’t show in her mirrors at home or wherever she got dressed and that the photo flashes really highlight it. But that seems like a rookie mistake, she really should know better by now.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        I will say, at least she’s wearing underwear. Unlike some we could name.

      • I just hate that kind of cleavage on anyone. I mean, I’m sure they look good naked, but when her boobs are like that, it’s like they’re pointed in opposite sides, under her armpits. Not a good look.

  10. Lucy2 says:

    The fabric looked interesting on TV, but someone should have done a camera flash test.
    I don’t like a plunging neckline when it’s that wide, it just shows way too much. Her hair and makeup looked good though.

  11. Kiddo says:

    I think she looks great. I don’t love the color, or how it translates in stills, or maybe the very very blonde hair with it. I’m not getting ‘cheap’ like others are saying.

    ETA: I don’t think she looks saggy either.

    • mimif says:

      She gets knocked down, but she gets back up again…
      *eyes Jell-O shot*
      *passes Justin blotting paper*

    • minime says:

      +1 She looks pretty good. The dress is pretty without being too much and if that is saggy…well…i don’t know, maybe ppl got too used to fake bobbies. The transparency is a bit too much for my taste, but well most of the ppl going to these celebrity meetings wear things that 90% of the rest of the population would not wear. Attending that, she did well.

      • LAK says:

        Please google Kate Moss wedding dress for how a dress like this should look.

      • minime says:

        @ LAK
        There will be always someone who dresses it better. Specially if they are extremely beautiful or top models ;) I know what you mean, still I disagree that she shouldn’t wear something like this. Her girls are not small as usually seen with these kind of dresses but also not over the top that it would look too vulgar. As I said, for a Hollywood event, I find it pretty good.

      • glynda says:

        Pretty sure she’s got saline implants. Heard that a while ago. She’s had 3 nose jobs…its not like she’d frown on a boob job. May even be on her second pair given her age.

    • AntiSocialButterfly says:

      Agree on the lack of saggyness. People forget what natural breasts look like, across the age spectrum. There are all different shapes & sizes.

      • maeliz says:

        Some don’t think about her being in her 40s not 20s before commenting on her breasts. Maybe because in Hollywood it not normal to see a woman without perky implants. She looks great

    • EC says:

      Totally agree. This is one of my favorite looks from her in a while. And her t-ts look great!

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I don’t think her breast ARE saggy. I think she has a phenomenal body, including her breasts, and I’m sure she looks beautiful naked. But I think that low V is very unflattering to her breasts and makes them LOOK saggy. That silhouette is just made for women with small breasts. It mashes larger ones down. The V is too wide. Look at Lupita’s dress and see the difference. I think she looks beautiful, though.

      • LAK says:

        What GNAT said. This deep a V is not a friend of ANYONE with boobs, no matter their state or age.

        By bringing up Kate Moss, I wished to point to someone with no boobs, and the right proportions in wearing a deep V, whose figure is somewhat in proportion.

        Jen is a rectangle with no neck, and no waist. Kate is a rectangle, but with a small waist. The same dress, which Kate wore as her wedding dress, looks completely different because it suits Kate’s body.

        This isn’t body shaming. This is knowing your body shape, type and what suits it best.

        The reason models look good is they understand their body types. With very few occasions, they dress to their types and thus look really good eg Kendall Jenner’s dress sense before and after she became a model. Before, she was dressing like Kim despite having a completely different body type. Now she dresses to complement her body, and she almost always looks good. Kim used to dress well for her body type. Even taking into consideration that her clothes are several sizes too small, she dresses very wrong for her body type now. She almost always looks fugly because she’s fighting her body type.

        Which brings me back to Jen. The trouser suit, this dress, fabulous pieces that are all WRONG for her. All I see are her flaws eg short neck, boxy body, short stature, thick waist, even her boobs are showcased in a way that makes them look saggy.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @LAK, who wrote (well, this is a great summation: “Which brings me back to Jen. The trouser suit, this dress, fabulous pieces that are all WRONG for her. All I see are her flaws eg short neck, boxy body, short stature, thick waist, even her boobs are showcased in a way that makes them look saggy.”

        Wow. I am in total agreement with everything you’ve so eloquently written. May I admire you?

        Ladies, please read @LAK’s eloquent (and tactful) post above. No one here is saying that Jennifer Aniston actually ‘has’ sagging breasts, but rather that they ‘look’ saggy in this dress because the style is unflattering and just ‘wrong’ for her height and body type.

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        Yep, GNAT, I agree. Jen has an amazing body, breasts included, but that neckline just seems meant for a much smaller chest. Still, overall, she does look beautiful. I just wish her stylist (if she has one) would have taken note of the visible panties.

      • someonestolemyname says:

        Agree with What GNAT and LAK said.

  12. Maya says:

    I think Jennifer took the word SAG to literally.

    Plus didn’t John Mayer say that Jennifer is stuck in 1998? Coincident or the truth?

    Except for the boob thing – I like this look. The colour really suits Jennifer.

    As for Justin – A creepy Ken doll is the only thing I am going to say.

    PS: saw some pictures where Jennifer was the one who went to table after table to network with the real A listers and none came to hers. How the mighty has fallen…

    • evasmom says:

      I am no JA fan but the body is amazing. Her hair looks dated though. I thought the delivery of her SAG intro was funny and spot on. I think i am softening up towards her. May a was this at SAG or Golden Globes?

    • GoOnGirl! says:

      You know I watched Fashion Police just to see what the “panel” (and I use that term loosely) said about her pants outfit. They loved it. Don’t see how. The panel mentioned nothing about how the suit fit, etc. It was all about her taking risks and wearing pants when other woman had on dresses, etc., and, again, how perky her breasts were. Thought Cathy Griffin might have been different, but I’m now giving this show a complete break. Sure they won’t miss this one viewer.

      • Tarsha says:

        First it was not wearing mascara in a movie was a ‘risk’ to Aniston, now people think her wearing pants is risky? smh What is wrong with these women on the panel that they think wearing pants is so rare that it qualifies as taking risks? How about wearing WHITE pants is taking risks?

  13. Renee says:

    I think that she looks TERRIBLE!!!!!!! The dress looks like it was made from a couch, you can see her underwear underneath it, and the middle part of her hair is doing her no favors. Everything looks like it is the same color…her hair, the dress, and her skin. Plus, the dress makes her look boxy, doesn’t she have a waist??? She could look so much better than this but she just looks tacky here and that is not a word that I would usually use to describe her attire. So gross!!!! (Why don’t I just say how I really feel). I also don’t like her body chain.

    Justin looks like his face is going to melt off…it’s interesting (not really) that it looks like he’s lightened his hair.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      My grandfather had a car from the 80s with that upholstery fabric.

    • T.C. says:

      Renee I agree 100%. That’s what I first noticed: the boxy shape and the blending sameness of color scheme. A very unflattering look for someone who has usually been so good with her red carpet game.

      • Camille (The Original) says:

        +1. As much as her defenders like to say she has ‘such a great’ body (she really only has a nicely toned pair of legs, I’ll give her that), she doesn’t have much of a waist and this dress only defines that. I do prefer this tank top style top on her (halter necks and strapless are not her friends), but the V is too low and I’m sorry but it doesn’t do her girls any favors in my opinion.

        And her boyfriend looks…weird. His face looks strange.

    • GoOnGirl! says:

      If we are lucky, this should be the last we see of her, unless she is asked to present at the Academy Awards. Let’s hope not! I’ve seen enough of her and her “statue” to last a lifetime. After not receiving that AA nomination, all bets were off, and she went back to dressing her usual way. It’s true her breast might be “perky” for a 46 year old, but this is also a woman who has never birthed a child nor breast fed. So why shouldn’t they “stand up”?

  14. LAK says:

    Several things;

    1. This dress would look better on someone with long body proportions who is also tall. Jen is too short and square for it. Lots of pics of Naomi Campbell in this type of dress from back in the day.

    2. Dress is better for the flat chested. It would look bad on anyone with boobs, no matter the state of their boobs.

    3. Is that underwear I see?!

    4. I guess good effort for breaking out of her dress comfort zone…..?

    5. Is extreme cleavage going to be her new thing?

    • someonestolemyname says:

      + 1

    • Camille (The Original) says:

      LAK – completely agree with you, well said. But Aniston often wears things that would better suit someone with supermodel proportions (see that red Gucci from the last awards thing as another example).

  15. Elizabeth says:

    This dress is HORRIBLE – one of the worst if the night. It reminds me of a 1980s solid gold dancer (anyone else remember them?) Why does she keep trying to show us how young and sexy she is. She should take a cue from Meryl Streep and stop trying so hard.

    • AntiSocialButterfly says:

      Wow. That’s pretty agist. Meryl Streep is 65 or older.

      • Beth says:

        Right? I love when women reach a certain age, society likes to lump them together. Never mind the 20-year difference between them, but I guess they are in the “old broad” category so time for both of them to wear potato sacks, right?

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        I agree it’s ageist. Goes right along with how women are treated in general in the film industry. If you’re a female, you can no longer be a sexual being after 40. It’s bad enough when MEN do this, but really sad and self-defeating when comments like that come from a female.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        It’s not about “no longer being a sexual being after 40.” It’s about being ‘tastefully’ sexual. It’s about attitude rather than blatant ‘in your face’ boobage and bootage (the woman is wearing a white thong, for goodness sake, so you can see her orange rear end). Look at her contemporaries and how they dress.

        Cate Blanchett (who also turns 46 this year) looks sexier in this outfit than Jen does in that low ‘V’ neck dress above:

        http://www.imdb.com/media/rm4241017344/nm0000949?ref_=nmmd_md_nxt

        This picture of Nicole Kidman is how Jen should look in her dress. This is what ‘tasteful’ and sexy looks like on a woman in her 40′s who dresses appropriately for her height and body:

        http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1645195264/nm0000173?ref_=nmmd_md_nxt

        Look at J-Lo at 42-years-old (she’ll be 47 this July). This is how a woman under 5’5″ looks when they dress appropriately for their height and body:

        http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3165240832/nm0000182?ref_=nmmd_md_nxt

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      I really think Jen is trying to do a Kate Hudson moment…but it’s not working for her.

    • Renee says:

      How dare you diss the SOlid Gold Dancers!!!!! Their costumes were EPIC!!!! Jen could only dream to ever look that good :)

    • minx says:

      Lol I certainly remember Solid Gold!

    • Cindy says:

      ouch. You will hit middle-age too, I promise. Being mean about someones age baffles me. We all end up old, so….

  16. Belle Epoch says:

    Less cleavage and better underwear would have been a lot more tasteful! Blind item said she was spotted at a booby doctor’s – apparently all the criticism of the saggy outfit got to her.

  17. epiphany says:

    ‘A vintage Galliano from 1998.’
    Everything about her is from 1998.
    And when all else fails, show some cleavage – that CNN article was spot on!

  18. obsidian says:

    Well, her boobs looks better – not flat and saggy like the last time. Good job, Jen. The matching tan, though, is too orangy.

  19. Anny says:

    I love this look. Actually it is the first one I liked while browsing SAG looks. Her hair look great with that dress. She has awesome body. The dress is really not something I would wear but she looks great in it. Damn. I hope I will look this great in my forties. Her figure is great – and not just for someone who is over 40. Her plastic surgeon must be really really talented guy. She looks 30 not 46.

    • Lahdidahbaby says:

      1. There is no reason to believe her body is the product of plastic surgery. In fact, it seems to be the general consensus that it’s not.

      2. Not every plastic surgeon is a “guy.”

      3. Sad when such sexist comments/attitudes come from a female.

    • glynda says:

      I saw Cake at TIFF she looks every bit her age both in person and onscreen in the movie. Though not as ‘cute,’ facially, she’s got the Goldie Hawn M.O. in effect, which is: a deep tan, lots of blonde hair in the face and a nice body that stays in shape will fool people who are at a distance into thinking she has a genuine youthful appearance. But up close it’s YOWZA.

  20. Anastasia says:

    Ha! Her underwear. Totally visible, front and back. Yuck.

    I don’t think it’s ANY coincidence at all that she’s been doing such massive cleavage reveals. Hell, can it even still be called cleavage at that point? More like “HERE ARE MY BOOBS.”

  21. Amcn says:

    Control top thong? Is there such thing? Whatever it is I don’t want to see it. No big white undies under a sheer dress!

  22. Emma - the JP Lover says:

    Sorry, I have to say it … Jen is too short and stumpy for that dress. I’m not going to comment on her visible ‘white’ thong panties. The dress was obviously designed for someone taller based upon the ‘V’ and the way it is wrapped beneath her feet (you can’t see even a hint of shoes). It’s a wonder she could even walk in the dress. Jen should really ask to borrow her good friend Reece Witherspoon’s tailor.

  23. Luca76 says:

    I actually don’t mind the dress. The hair looks bad and the body chain is eww. That body chain thing was actually never a thing so I don’t even think she can bring it back from the 90s.

    • LAK says:

      My grandparents always had such rude opinions of women who wore body chains such that when I see them now, I can’t help thinking what my grandparents said and whether it applies to the ladies.

      • I can’t stand body chains, LAK. I just wince whenever I see them–I think Beyonce and/or Ciara (or it might’ve been Alicia Keys) started wearing them…..maybe Rihanna too. They just drive me CRAZY. I would be scared to death to wear them…be afraid that I’d break the chain or something. And I just DO NOT get people who wear actual jewelry to the pool/beach….

  24. Louise177 says:

    Jennifer looks desperate. I think mostly because of the combination of wearing low cut dresses, desperation for Oscar, and constantly talking about Brad and Angelina. It’s fine for a woman in her mid/late 40′s+ to be sexy but it can look tacky and pathetic when done too much and too often.

    • glynda says:

      Someone once asked Tim Gunn about the ‘style,’ of different celebs and he called hers ‘desperate.’ At the time I didn’t pay much attention to her so I didn’t know what he meant…but that is very apt. Lol

  25. Allie says:

    I’m going to say that she looks great. It’s my favorite look so far. I don’t like her, and I usually hate her styles so it’s so shocking that I like this.

    • Termoli77 says:

      This look was definitely the best in her three award appearances. I don’t like the dress but her body looks great in it and I don’t like the low V but her boobs look better in this than that ugly red pantsuit she wore at that other award show. I don’t get that body necklace thing and she wore it twice? What’s that all about? She looked horrible at the Globes with the updo and the black dress plus she was uncomfortable and it showed. I think her attitude now is, well I didn’t get an Oscar nomination but I still have a banging bod in my mid 40s so screw it.

  26. Reed says:

    Orange is the new Jen.

  27. redd says:

    The thong is RIDIC, but the dress is amazing and she looks stunning.

  28. MrsBPitt says:

    I thought she looked good, until I saw the back shot with her undies showing! C’mon…she had to know that thong was going to show! Jen, Jen, Jen, you will do anything to get the public talking about you!

  29. aang says:

    I like the dress but I’d like to see it on someone with a higher hip to waist ratio and taller maybe. Or perhaps the cut of the dress would make anyone look a little boxy or thick waisted. Whatever, It just did no favors for her body (which is amazing). The color looks great on her. Wish I couldn’t see her underwear.

  30. scout says:

    Saggy boobies again, yikes. What’s with JT’s shiny smooth forehead? Botox? He looks like a Mannequin.

  31. Lala says:

    I think she looks great. I never cared for her and her stupid hair… But don’t get the negative comments about her boobs. Those are saggy boobs? They are natural looking which is hot to me. I know her face has been reworked plenty but nothing wrong with her boobs or her feeling confident enough to wear that dress. There are real things to dislike about her… The way her boobs look in a dress feels like reaching.

    • Anon says:

      Idk, her boobs sagged more in the late nineties and early 2000s…in pictures I’ve seen. What does that tell you? Especially for a woman that doesn’t like to wear bras…surprised we don’t see the nips, unless it is true about the pokies.

  32. OSTONE says:

    That dress looks like it came directly from the costume department of American Hustle. Her body is bangin’, but girl why?!

  33. maeliz says:

    At least she’s wearing undies. So many have been seen not. She could have found a better pair. I’m sure not every woman commenting has breasts better than hers. They don’t stay perky and perfect forever. Sagging happens

    • Penelope says:

      This is a gossip and fashion site. No one has to have better boobs than JA in order to comment that hers look saggy–they DO.

  34. minx says:

    Too tan, same old boring hair, cleavage is too wide, the fabric looks tacky and you can see her underwear.

  35. Marianne says:

    First of all….YOU CAN TOTALLY SEE HER UNDERWEAR!!!!!!!!!! Which is number 1 reason this dress gets a thumbs down from me.

    Secondly, Im just not finding it super flattering on her anyway.

  36. Mary-Alice says:

    I’ve been Galliano fan for very long and I know this dress, i.e. I have seen it. It shouldn’t look like that. Jennifer doesn’t have the body for it AT ALL. She literally ruined the dress.

  37. Mollie says:

    Other than the underwear, she looks phenomenal, I love that color of dress with her hair, her skin looks fantastic, and there is NO sag of breasts, those are beautiful breasts and I’m sick of breast-hate.

  38. DarkSparkle says:

    I called my husband in the room to see this and he screamed “SEE I’M NOT OLD! I EVEN PLAYED A STRIPPER RECENTLY, BECAUSE I’M STILL HOT AND NOT OLD, AND I CAN GET UGLY FOR A ROLE BECAUSE SEE??! I STILL GOT IT.”

    Yep, that’s about what this dress yelled too.

  39. Mollie says:

    Why shouldn’t she flaunt her body? At any age?

    • Janet says:

      Best comment I’ve read all morning. You totally nailed it.

    • Lala says:

      What does any of that mean? I think that is pretty offensive. She should joke about her saggy boobs and hot flashes? She is 46. And why does she have to make a joke of herself or say she has saggy boobs or hot flashes? Maybe she doesn’t. She isn’t that old. Why does she have to be some sort of stereotype? Why can’t she just be a sexy woman? I think she looks fine and I think she probably works hard on her body. She should be proud. I am sorry but not all women dry up and wither at 40. That is your choice.

    • RobN says:

      On the other hand, my husband declared her still on his “list” and thought she looked sexy as hell.

      • glynda says:

        On the other hand my brother swears up and down any guy putting her on his ‘list,’ is secretly gay, or has a wife who has a face just like hers…or would put a bag over her head first. Bro is mean.

      • Tarsha says:

        Lol, glynda your brother rocks!

    • Ethelreda says:

      @lala

      +1 I’m about the same age as Jennifer and must say I cringed at some of the comments here. So in order to prove that ‘you’re aware that you’re a middle aged woman’ – whatever that means – you have to cover up and make jokes about hot flashes? Even though she’s probably never experienced them? I know I never have.

      And for those who are saying her boobs are ‘saggy’… NO. Real boobs that are more than an A cup are going to have some sag, even on a 22 year old. I think Jen’s boobs look fab, a hell of a lot better than those awful fake half melons you see WAY too often.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        Oh for goodness sake … why are people so sensitive today? No one is saying her breasts are actually sagging, they are saying that her girls ‘look’ saggy in the dress. It’s about the dress, which is the wrong style for her. It’s the dress that’s making her girls look saggy, not the girls themselves.

      • minx says:

        I just don’t think that wide cleavage is flattering, on her. If she doesn’t want people to comment on her breasts then don’t have them hanging out. Simple.

      • Lala says:

        People got a bit sensitive because there were people insinuating that she was too old for the dress and had old saggy boobs when her body looks fine. But that’s how hypocritical it is. Some people are totally off limits when it comes to discussing their breasts or their bodies. I am not even wanting to defend her… I just get annoyed with the things being picked out about her.

      • Ethelreda says:

        @Lala. The reply function seems to be messed up but again I agree with you. I get that people don’t like Aniston, which is fine – I think she’s harmless enough but each to their own. But it’s funny how comments which would be slammed as ‘body shaming’ are fine when it comes to certain people. You don’t have to like the dress or think that it’s flattering on her, but imho to claim that she can’t wear it because she has ‘saggy boobs’ – she clearly doesn’t – or because she needs to ‘dress her age’ – whatever that actually means – is ridiculous.

        Oh, and since when has making jokes about bodily functions been a sign of a mature and sophisticated lady? I always thought precisely the opposite was true!

      • OliviaPope says:

        +100

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        That neckline is just not flattering on anyone with any type of breasts.

    • epiphany says:

      Self deprecating humor indicates a certain level of self confidence and understanding of oneself. As I stated, I think it’s terrific for Aniston, or any middle aged woman, to be, and view themselves, as sexy. However, that ,means different things at different ages, and that, IMO, is a good thing. A 25 year old ingénue may have a great body, but that’s all she has; a 46 year old woman can certainly have that, plus a lot more intangible gifts, assuming she’s matured and accepted who she is – one of them is the ability to not take herself too seriously. Elizabeth Taylor constantly made self-deprecating jokes about herself; Sophia Loren says she looks like a frog, but somehow, it all works. That Aniston still thinks of herself, and dresses herself, as if she’s still 25, and her go-to fashion conclusion is ‘when in doubt, show some skin’, IMO, is a shame, because if she did a little soul searching, she would find (hopefully!) that she has more to offer than a nice body.

      • Jayna says:

        @epiphany, you can’t be serious. In an ageist town where actresses can’t get work, she should be joking about hot flashes, when I highly doubt at 45 she has ever even had one or knows what one feels like? And guess what, I’m sure the minute an older actress feels hot flashes, she is on hormone therapy and never feels one again, just like my mother did after her hysterectomy.

        As far as dressing very sexy at age 45, here’s the Sophia Loren you were talking about, age 74, boobs on full display. And I seriously doubt one single actress in the world at 45 is going to be joking on the red carpet about hot flashes. Not even actresses in their 50s like Julianne Moore would do such a thing. Why should they?

        Just wow at your logic.

        http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f0/Sophia_Loren_in_London.jpg

      • Lala says:

        Thank you so much. People can hate on this woman all day long about real things. I’ve never found her very attractive. But acting like she should cover up because she is no longer 20 when she has a better body than most people I see half her age is repulsive. Should the men her age be making fun of themselves too… How they need to pop a Viagra on the way home in case their date wants some action. No. She really isn’t that old. Nor does she look it. Age happens to us all if we live long enough. And dressing sexy doesn’t mean she has nothing else going on either. It just means she wants to show off her figure. Good for her.

      • GoOnGirl! says:

        Find it strange when all the pregnancy rumors were going around, and she had her little bellie, she did nothing to stop those rumors. Now that she is being a sex symbol, the 10 pounds or so have gone, and she’s showing everything. No one is saying she needs to cover up, but there are ways to dress, still be sexy, and cover up, and Jennifer has yet to figure it out. Her motto seems to be something has to be showing. I wouldn’t doubt we’ll see her ass next.

      • Ethelreda says:

        ”No one is saying she needs to cover up, but there are ways to dress, still be sexy, and cover up”

        So you ARE saying she needs to cover up!

      • Janet says:

        Ethelreda says: So you ARE saying she needs to cover up!

        Not at all. She doesn’t need to do anything she doesn’t want to. If she wants to look ridiculous that’s her right. It’s a free country, isn’t it?

      • OliviaPope says:

        Why should she do something to stop the rumors? That’s funny!! She owes nothing to anyone…and she can wear whatever she likes. We don’t HAVE to like it. What she does or doesn’t do sure seems to bother a lot of people. Smh!!

      • Ethelreda says:

        @OliviaPope

        I think the simple truth is that, for many people on this site, Aniston just can’t win. Whatever she does, or doesn’t do, whatever she wears, or doesn’t wear, people will find fault.

        Like I said above, I’m no fan of hers but she doesn’t bother me either. If people don’t like her, that’s fine too, but it’s so obvious that many of the comments above are rooted in dislike for her, and anything else is beside the point.

      • Ethelreda says:

        @ Lahdidahbaby

        I actually find it quite comical! I’m neutral on Aniston – yes, it IS possible! – but I get a bit of a laugh at how she brings out the crazy in so many people!

        If she’d worn an LBD, it would be ”Oh, why has she worn the same dress for 25 years?”. If she changes it up, then it’s all about how ‘desperate’ she is. H If she wears a baggy dress, she’s courting pregnancy rumours. If she wears a tight dress, she’s doing the same… and round and round we go.

        Try to see the funny side of i! Because it IS funny!

      • OliviaPope says:

        @Lahdidahbaby and Etherelda

        It’s seriously mind boggling. Every post on her… The say the same thing over and over! For a boring, vapid, clueless, talentless, desperate, shameless, Oscar hungry, unfortunate looking, stumpy, orange, dlisted, man eater, home wrecker blah blah blah(did I cover them all??) woman she sure makes people loose their shit!! Give it a rest already…WE GET IT!!✌️
        #moveonalready

      • glynda says:

        It’s not really “mind boggling.” Here’s my theory:

        I agree with Olivia and Ethel…Aniston is like a rorschact test…much in the way that Kim Kardashian or even Chelsea Handler is. The difference between those two and Aniston are that they are pretty self made despite the animus people have for their brand. It’s theirs they created and own it.

        Whereas a large part of Aniston is this habit she has of faking her way to the top of the celeb pile and that is wholeheartedly driven by her own neurosis. She represents a lot of our own insecurities. Are we pretty Mommy? But am I prettier than her? I think that’s what makes us look at her like we would a car wreck. It’s why she was so embraced and coddled after her split by legions of fellow dumpees. She gives off a vaguely disturbed sad vibe. Like all is not well.

        When i say ‘fake,’ it’s not that I think that ensemble sitcom Friends that ran for 10 years and made her name wasn’t real….but her press (dropping trou and showing skin, a haircut and then the marriage to the movie star) was designed to bulldoze her way thru the path of least resistance..and to shore up her own self image.

        Then the messy acromonious divorce (only AFTER she finds out hub is dating the sexiest most beautiful blah blah blah) which started her poor me tour to demonize them and keep her beloved and relevant among women just like her…her entire career just screams fakery and PR machinations.

        Plus the neurosis and passive aggressiveness she’s recently admitted. A lot of women are like her…bitter…and my god…sooo needy.

        Still more women despise a weak fraud which she embodies. Yes she’s boring and not that talented or special…but she’s that meh girl we all knew in school who other average girls elevated as their spokesperson ascribing to her attributes/qualities she didn’t deserve because they didn’t find her threatening — and left us scratching our heads. In that way she is interesting.

      • Ethelreda says:

        @glenda

        My goodness!!! You’ve really put an awful lot of thought into this, haven’t you? Not only here, but in your numerous other comments thrashing Aniston’s looks. I think you’re kind of proving our point!

        Why all this pop psychology analysis for a TV/rom-com actress? Aniston isn’t so different from many celebs – only moderately talented or beautiful, and she owes a lot to a lucky break. And yes, she does play the Hollywood game but so what? So do any number of others. What’s so uniquely offensive about her?

        It’s funny how the very same people who go on about how untalented, average looking and irrelevant Aniston is, still obsess about her on every single post!

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        Exactly, Ethelreda! Exactly. You have summed it up perfectly.

      • perplexed says:

        It doesn’t make sense to me how Kim Kardashian could be considered self-made. And I’d take Aniston’s career over Kardashian’s any day. I don’t really want Handler’s career either, but Kardashian’s career is total ick (who wants to rely on their mother’s advice to make a sex tape to get where they are?).

      • Lala says:

        The comments about Anniston are just bizarre. I don’t understand how a woman with above average looks (I wouldn’t describe her as beautiful) that makes crappy movies can bring out such weirdness. She is the spokeswoman for all the bitter, dumped, plain women? Are you kidding? Not to mention the seeming need to defend those other two against her wiley ways of “keeping the triangle going” for her own gain. They don’t need you to defend their honor. They do not care. Why would they? Dang, you know, I would hate to know that my husband could leave me and take up with someone as gorgeous as aj and people would work as hard as this to make me a bad guy. Hey… Maybe she was hurt when it ended. She was married to him. That happened. I wish there was as much hate placed on him for making the “mistake” of marrying her instead of waiting for his true love. I’ve never been dumped like that, but it must be weird to have people behave like you are the one that inserted yourself into the “triangle”. Jen was there when aj came along. If they had waited… There wouldn’t have been as much suspicion. And people thinking she drug them thru the mud are nuts. She could have. Looks to me like she took the high road.

      • Janet says:

        @Lala: If she had taken the high road, she would have done what Nicole Kidman and Debbie Reynolds did when they were publicly dumped by their spouses: they kept their heads up and their mouths shut. Instead, Aniston launched a decade-long pity party (which she now realizes did her a lot more harm than good so she announced the party’s over) and encouraged her personal pit bull to trash not only Jolie but also her children. I think she’s a passive-aggressive airhead but feel free to admire her all you want. Like I said above, it’s a free country.

      • perplexed says:

        Nicole Kidman did talk about her divorce. She was on Oprah talking about it. I distinctly remember, because she was very pretty and at the height of her beauty during the episode (before she did all the weird stuff to her face). She’s often talked about Tom Cruise, even now when she’s married to Keith Urban. The only thing she hasn’t talked about is Scientology’s effect on Tom Cruise, but I assume that’s because of how difficult they can make one’s life if you dare to say anything about them.

        And I found this article where Debbie Reynolds had talked about Eddie Fisher: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1268158/Debbie-Reynolds-losing-husband-Eddie-Fisher-Elizabeth-Taylor.html

        I have no issue with Reynolds talking about it, but she goes into what seems like a fair amount of detail. But, again, it doesn’t bother me since Eddie Fisher sounds like a turd.

      • Janet says:

        Reynolds talked about Fisher 50 years after everything had transpired. Aniston went bleating off to Vanity Fair just months after her divorce was finalized, whining about missing sensitivity chips, screaming at the ocean and whatever. And considering Cruise all but cut off Kidman’s access to her adopted children, I’d say Kidman has behaved toward him with commendable restraint.

        Fisher was weak, period. Nobody could understand at the time what Taylor even saw in him, especially after being married to Mike Todd.

      • perplexed says:

        Regardless, they’ve talked about their divorces. Whatever Reynolds has to say sounds far more personal than anything I’ve seen uttered from anyone else in any kind of celebrity or royal triangle. She’s even commented on the Angelina/Brad/Jennifer mess in relation to her marriage and Taylor, comparing herself to Aniston. A simple Google search brings up this information. The names of Reynolds and Kidman were brought up as people who kept their mouths shut about what went on, and they haven’t. Not that I think they said anything terrible, but they haven’t been quiet. The only celebrity/famous person I can think of who has never uttered a word about her personal life is Jackie Kennedy. Other than that, they’ve all discussed their lives at various points. In the case of Kidman, she has to be quiet, otherwise Scientology could make her life very difficult. I assume that’s why Holmes hasn’t talked either, although in her case she managed to get custody of her kid and was the one who struck first to get out. In neither case of the wives who have been married to Tom Cruise do I see one taking on a particular tact because of dignity but rather self-preservation. Nonetheless, when Kidman was on Oprah, she made it pretty clear that the divorce was very hard on her. Her talk show appearance seemed much more intimate than what Aniston had to say in Vanity Fair. Part of the reason she won the public’s sympathy was because of what she had to say on Oprah and in other venues (through “sources). I don’t remember her being quiet at all. She even mentioned the miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy she had some time in the years after, and this was while she was married to Keith Urban. She says enough to gain sympathy (not that I don’t think she deserves it or anything), but not too much to tick off the people who run Scientology, and probably have her auditing sessions stored somewhere.

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        Perplexed. Thank you for your logical and fact-based post. Wish I’d said it half so well.

      • Ennie says:

        DEbbie and Nicole and some others have children, they will be asked and have to be polite. You have to admit that Nicole risks the relationship with her children if she badmouths Cruise, but at the same time she has to mention her kids (hoping to get them back) and be polite about her former marriage.
        DEbbie, well she is talented, but I know her mostly because the scandal, her movies are memorable, but the scandal is what keeps her still on mags.

      • Lala says:

        @ Janet– I don’t really know that I admire aniston… I haven’t ever really thought much about it. I guess something about the way shd is villainized on here struck a chord with me. Maybe it’s because I am not as reserved and I don’t play the politics that people in Hollywood have to play. If I wanted to talk about my divorce and what it did to me or say my husband was a jerk that said forever and then found someone else… I would. I would consider that my right as long as I did not lie. I don’t care that he ended up with aj. I am one of the people that thinks she is incredibly beautiful. I think almost any man would have a hard time not falling for her. And I don’t know if they got together while he was still married doesn’t matter now… They are married and seem to be happy. I just don’t get how anyone would think that they need to make aniston out like she is this conniving horrible person. It is silly and it seems wrong. He married her. He was her husband. If she wants to talk about that all day long… It did happen. As for Chelsea handler… We all have friends that have their own opinions. I am sure the woman has drawn her own conclusions as many others have. Some people have strong opinions of people that they see as not respecting relationships. Do I think jolie is a bad person? No. I do think she fell for someone else’s husband. But that was for him to shut down in the beginning. But I think he fell for her too. They didn’t kill anyone and there were no children involved in the marriage so I don’t think anyone should hold that against them at this point. I will never understand why anyone thinks he is such a prize. But same way I get tired of hearing them get beat up for what they did… It is annoying to hear people go on and on about this one being so calculated and keeping herself associated with the other two. News flash: he married her. He said he loved her. That happened. If she wants to talk about that part of her life.., that is her right. And this isn’t the 50′s either when women had to keep their mouths shut and just let things happen. Some of you have some pretty antiquated opinions about women staying quiet and being good girls. Uh… Like Jackie Kennedy? Gag. It’s your life and you have every right to talk about it if you so choose as long as it is the truth. What kind of sick idea is it that she has to be quiet? I am sorry but some of you have some really creepy ideas.

      • Tarsha says:

        Lala Chelsea Handler introed Aniston on her show by attacking Jolie and her children, twice. And both times, Aniston walked on stage grinning like a Cheshire cat. One must be very naïve not to understand Aniston approved of it at the very least. And, sorry, but I think its a creepy idea to think that 10 years on, you need to use your ex-husband as a talking point, when you are supposedly happily engaged to the one true love of your life. That is very creepy indeed.

      • Lala says:

        @ tarsha- she gets asked and answers the questions because it sells the mags. So what? What’s wrong with that? People must still be interested. I see everyone go back and forth about it on this website like it all happened yesterday. He was her husband. That won’t ever change. Maybe she has regrets. Maybe she still loves him. Maybe she doesn’t care for the woman he is with now. I don’t find that so crazy. I just don’t understand why she is supposed to act like it never happened… Like she did something wrong. Maybe that’s her claim to fame. So what. He married her.

      • Tarsha says:

        Then, its her CHOICE to answer the questions, because she has the right to veto any questions, in advance. So she knowingly allows and answers them. The point is, no mature, stable, healthy adult keeps using a man and his family to keep herself in the public eye. That IS something wrong, so she is doing wrong by doing that. I really don’t understand how you can’t see that? Her behaviour is not healthy. Not in anyone’s language.

      • GoOnGirl! says:

        Agree, agree and again agree!

      • norah says:

        its sad that a woman who is rich enough has nothing new to add to the conversation at all.same topics same need to show off her body her physical appearance is all that she is made up of nothing beyond that.she hasn’t learnt anything and will never learn.she cd have Changed the conversation from poor jeb and her personal life to ja dramatic actress but she didn’t do that.

      • GoOnGirl! says:

        But when is enough is enough? The divorce happened over 10 years ago and Jen has been involved with how many men? And is engaged to one now, who she sometimes, kinda conveniently, seems to forget about and throws under the bus. We get it. It’s her story and no one can tell it like her. But give it a rest. Why isn’t she looking forward to her future with Justin?

      • GoOnGirl! says:

        To Janet: And the congregation does say “Amen”.

      • Ennie says:

        She took the high road and ended up years later in another triangle wit her being the “other woman” and not waiting or wasting time getting with the new boyfriend when he still was with someone else.

      • glynda says:

        Lala…stop lying. Nothing about Aniston’s face or features taken separately or together equates to “beautiful.” There’s a standard of beauty we have in most cultures and her cake poster (aka her real face) is the opposite of that.

      • Lala says:

        @ glynda— stop lying about what? I never called aniston beautiful. She wouldn’t be my type. I think the other one is way hotter… She is way more my speed. That was the point I was making. How can a woman that is just above average looks… Not beautiful… Get people so defensive. Not to mention people acting like she committed a crime by being with brad pitt. He liked her enough to marry her. It didn’t work out. You would think she was outside his window every night begging him to leave his wife and children. I don’t see that this woman has done anything wrong.

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        @Glynda: you have just proved my case with your dissertation on Aniston. Jaysus, get a grip, would you? I come to CB for the celeb news, the harmless dish, and to deconstruct fashion. Clearly, you need to be writing your doctoral dissertation on Jennifer Aniston. But it will have to be better researched than that, and based on fact, not merely your own bias. If this is how you want to expend your energies, go for it.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @OliviaPope, who wrote: “It’s seriously mind boggling. Every post on her… The say the same thing over and over! For a boring, vapid, clueless, talentless, desperate, shameless, Oscar hungry, unfortunate looking, stumpy, orange, dlisted, man eater, home wrecker blah blah blah(did I cover them all??) woman she sure makes people loose their shit!! Give it a rest already…WE GET IT!!✌️#moveonalready”

        Well … it’s called gossip for a reason, you know. I think the problem is that many people posting today want Jennifer Aniston excluded from the average dialogue that happens here all the time. Unfortunately for you and the others, that just won’t happen. One of the things I love most about the “Celebitchy” website is the fact that no celebrity is safe from commentary … from the writers or the posters. That’s what makes this one of the best celebrity blogs ever. :)

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        It’s not about not liking her … it’s about commenting on what she’s wearing at an Industry event, just like we’re commenting on what the ladies in the other 6 or 7 articles posted here at “Celebitchy” about the SAGS and how ‘they’ looked at last night’s event. Why in the world should Jennifer Aniston be excluded from the commentary?

      • Lala says:

        @goongirl… So you aren’t saying she needs to cover up… You are just saying she needs to cover up. I guess we were all misunderstanding you. Thanks for clearing that up.

      • Crumpet says:

        Thank you! Epiphany is trying to have one, but failed miserably.

      • BlueeJay says:

        Help me understand. Is there an age where you can no longer show your breasts? Is it allowed at 25 but not 45? Are you saying that old women have to all dress like Meryl? Who decides what is appropriate? You? If you actually look at pictures of Aniston at 25 she dresses much differently then she does now.

      • epiphany says:

        Oh good grief, doesn’t anyone recognize hyperbole when they read it? I was using an over-the-top example to demonstrate that Aniston needs to accept who she is, be happy in her own skin; do you really think I expect her to make a joke about menopause on the red carpet? Okay, you don’t like that joke, how about this one? Aniston says, ” I find it rude that you would nominate a 46 year old woman for a SAG award.” Now that’s funny! I just think she would win a lot of people over if she gave some indication that she’s okay with being middle aged – humor is an effective tool to do that. Do you get it now? Apparently Aniston isn’t the only one who needs to cultivate a sense of humor.

      • Crumpet says:

        @epiphany – your sense of humor is broken, if you think that SAG comment was funny. Sheesh.

      • epiphany says:

        Wow, I guess you told me!
        Once again – now, pay attention – hyperbole – hy-per-bole – noun; a exaggerated comment or claim not meant to be taken literally. Or, in this case, seriously.

      • Lala says:

        @ epiphany– I am not sure why aniston needs to convince anyone she is okay with being middle aged. Is that something that women need to make sure they do? Are you kidding? Is it offensive that she doesn’t go hide out because she is “middle aged”? Not all women age the same way. Some choose to quit with short dresses at 30 and some don’t. I didn’t know there was some arbitrary age where we all need to joke about having gray hair and losing our teeth just to let people know we know our place. Cause that’s what you really mean. You mean that she needs to know her place. Not everyone gives up in being hot at 40. I am not there yet… But I don’t intend to hang it up when I am.

    • minx says:

      I don’t think she has to cover up her breasts or get surgery. She could do herself a big favor by wearing undergarments that make her look more youthful. Just help the girls along a little.

    • Ethelreda says:

      She’s not there to crack ‘self deprecating’ jokes. She’s there to look fab on the red carpet at an awards show in which she was nominated. One can disagree about whether or not she carries off the look, but the idea that she has to make jokes about hot flashes (seriously?) just because she’s 45 seems absurd to me. Do you also think men of the same age should use the red carpet as an opportunity to make ‘self deprecating’ jokes about their moobs and middle aged spread?

      • epiphany says:

        I’ve seen plenty of middle aged actors poke fun at themselves, both on the red carpet and in interviews. Besides, Aniston’s supposed to have this great comedic timing. You’re telling me if a reporter had commented to Aniston, “wow, that dress is very daring, that’s a lot of skin!, and Aniston answered back, “yeah, just in case I have a hot flash I wanted to have on as little as possible,” that wouldn’t have been hilarious – not to mention, kind of endearing?

      • Ethelreda says:

        I don’t think it would be either hilarious OR endearing. Not at all. Just as I wouldn’t find it hilarious or endearing if she cracked a joke about hoping she didn’t get her period while wearing a white dress.

        Aside from the fact that it’s unlikely Aniston has ever experienced a hot flash in her life, since when have the most tired cliches about ‘middle aged women’ been funny?

      • mia girl says:

        @epiphany – I can’t imagine any actress making that type of joke on the red carpet with all of the ageism they already face in Hollywood. Why would they? To show they are embracing their peri-menopausal reality? That shows class? I find this way of thinking rather odd.

        Plus, women are still sexy during and after menopause. But the last thing these actresses need to do is remind the industry of this because… middle age= old.

      • The Original G says:

        I haven’t seen Jen do self-deprecating humor. She seems too sensitive about herself for that.

        She has a great body. I just don’t think her cleavage baring is that attractive on her.

        BTW, don’t the Hollywood fashion mavens and stylists kind of go for those small pancake breasts?

        **Seems we can’t respond to each other’s posts?**

      • Jag says:

        It would have been odd to me and would have made me think she’s in early menopause, which does happen to some women. I would rather her answer, “Yeah, I wanted to feel sexy and skin can be sexy.”

  40. Louise says:

    horrendous.

    Remember when Chris Rock said about Janet Jackson and the super bowl with Timberlake that noone wanted to see a 40-year old t*tty? Well, Jennifer looks great for her age but those puppies are saggy and she should not have them out like that. They are drooping too close to her waist.

    How can she look in the mirror and think “great”. AWFUL.

    • Beth says:

      Because they are not sagging too close to her waist. And why you quote the opinion of some misogynistic comedian as the gospel of truth? Lots of these pigs want women covered up by 25.

    • Camille (The Original) says:

      A lot of people getting butt hurt over the breast comments – LOL.

  41. siri says:

    I’m trying to figure out why she would choose white underwear, that you can see from back AND front. Also, her hair, and the color of the dress plus her tan, make it all look so…I don’t know….boring? It’s basically all one shade. Her boobies are ok (compared to mine), just I can’t warm up to the idea to let it all hang out- nobody will look at your face, or into your eyes really…just unclassy to me.

  42. Sass back says:

    Love this dress. Easily could have come out this year. Kind of a cool choice because Galliano is back in fashion this year, within the last month. The underwear thing is eh, I bet it’s nude and she thought it was the best color for hiding. I don’t get why they’re calling her dated, particularly with the hair thing, because like everyone else, I’m watching Friends on Netflix and her hair changes vastly from season to season. As for her cleavage, I see other stars going around with the same cleavage on display without the criticism she gets. Nearly every star tries to look fashion forward and sexy on the red carpet, why does she get the ‘look at me’ label? Girl is 45 and works hard for that body, she should get to show it off. I’m 20 years younger and my boobs don’t look that good. I will never understand the constant criticism of her fashion choices on this site because to me she is easily one of the more consistently best dressed stars.

    • Lady D says:

      My computer is a 12-year-old dinosaur with a faded screen, and I can tell the underwear is white.

      • minx says:

        The white underwear was the first thing I noticed. It had to be deliberate. There is no way she, Justin, her stylist or whomever didn’t see that.

      • Sass back says:

        See, I immediately thought light buff. I’m pale and light buff would blend for me, but on someone as tan as her, light buff would be as bad as white.

  43. Janet says:

    I see London, I see France… ugh. Just, ugh.

    What was the matter with Justin? He looked like he was in pain.

  44. Jayna says:

    I thought she looked great. I usually hate her tan on her face, so orangy, too dark. But her face had a glowing tan last night when the camera would pan to her, so I actually liked it. Her tan on her body was still a little too dark orangy as usual,.

    The gown was striking on her. I didn’t notice the undies until pointed out here. LOL Now I can’t unsee it. What a big oops. In gowns like that they need to do video of themselves in all kinds of lighting to see what shows.

    I think it qualifies as vintage technically in describing it for the red carpet. How else do you say you are wearing a Galiano gown from 17 years ago?

    I don’t get the boob hate, but I think it’s tasteful. I don’t see any tackiness.

  45. The Original G says:

    I think that when someone says your boobs “look great for your age”, it’s time to select a different style of dress.

    Also, just too orange, and that means you too, Mr. McEybrow.

  46. Susie Q says:

    It’s time for her to put the girls away and didn’t her mother ever teach her about nude coloured underwear? If she chose the white so it would show, it was a an odd choice.

  47. mermaid says:

    you would think that she would not want to undercut (this feels like a pun but dont think it is) the leverage she gained from the oscar campaign. and yet these past two looks really do. they also feel sort of 70s and not current (I know dress is from 98 and not meant to be but there is * vintage * and there is * vintage *), cheesy with too much reveal. (and I like her generally.) I read comment above from someone who thought the look looked current – it is just something about how she is carrying it off, the chain, too much boob, her hair.

    does celebitchy ban commenters comments they do not like?

  48. I Choose Me says:

    Not a fan of being able to see what underwear a celeb is wearing but she does have a fantastic body and I really love the colour and fabric of the dress.

  49. perplexed says:

    I think the dress (minus the cleavage) is nice, but maybe the tan works against it. I wonder if maybe even the cleavage wouldn’t look bad without the tan. Maggie Gyllenhaal looks just as saggy to me, but she’s not tanned, so maybe the “sag” is less noticeable without a tan?

    I did kind of wonder if she was trying to rebel against the opinions of the E! Fashion Police. If so, that would be kind of funny.

    • For me, Maggie ALWAYS dresses frumpy. Or looks frumpy bc of that hair. But she always looks undone to me, somehow, and her boobs always look kinda droopy to me in her dresses. But she always just looks off….

      • perplexed says:

        Oh yeah, I definitely think Maggie looks frumpy. But people seemed to talk about her boobs less, which looked quite weird to me. Although maybe the lack of discussion about her boobs is because of the frumpiness, and not the lack of tan…

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Perplexed and Virgilia Coriolanus …

        Or maybe because Maggie is 5’9″ tall (and has the height to pull of the look) and has two children?

      • perplexed says:

        I had no idea Maggie was 5’9″. She looks pretty short in photos. Although I have no idea what height really has to do with cleavage. Some people, like J-LO, who is much shorter, don’t have weird looking cleavage. Anyway, I didn’t like her dress or her overall look at all. Whether Maggie has kids or not is irrelevant to me. She looked like a disaster on the red carpet and had terrible hair even before she had kids. She can act, but whenever I see her on the red carpet I wonder how she managed to become a star.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Perplexed …

        It was just said in explanation as to why people may not be talking about her cleavage.

        J-Lo has a wonderful tailor. Her clothes usually look good on her frame for her height. J-Lo and Jennifer Aniston list their height a s5’4″, but I think both women are lying. Both women also seem obsessed with wearing 6″ heels in order to appear taller, too.

      • perplexed says:

        Yeah, I know why you were commenting, but I disagree that Maggie G’s height makes a difference in order to “pull of the look” she was wearing. She looks just as bad to me as a short person would have in her dress, so much so that it would never have occurred to me that she’s 5’9″.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Perplexed, who wrote: “But people seemed to talk about her boobs less, which looked quite weird to me. Although maybe the lack of discussion about her boobs is because of the frumpiness, and not the lack of tan… ”

        Only the ‘She has two children’ part of my comment was in response to your puzzlement about why “people seemed to talk about her (Maggie’s) boobs less” … because people here know that she has kids. The bit about height was for @Virgilia Coriolanus.

      • perplexed says:

        She was frumpy before she had kids. She’s always been frumpy. I had mentioned that in my original comment.

        A lot of other celebrities have had kids too (i.e J-Lo, Madonna, Gwyneth Paltrow), but that doesn’t halt discussion on anything with respect to their physiques. Gwyneth’s sagginess has been mentioned before, and she’s had two children as well. I doubt people were trying to respect the fact that Maggie G has had kids. She’s probably simply too boring to discuss in comparison to other celebrities.

  50. dibba says:

    the jewelry wrecks it.

  51. Jaded says:

    Any dress through which you can see a thong is just cheap and bad. And enough with the bewbs Jenn. We know you have bewbs. That’s all I have to say as Justin is too slimy for words.

  52. EM says:

    She should have worn flesh coloured underpants.

  53. Laura Zimmerman says:

    It seems that with all this cleavage that Jennifer seems compelled to show these days, she should be adopted by the Kardishians; especially Kim. Jennifer has a great body, but when you get into your 40′s, no matter how great your body looks, gravity has taken a toll on your breasts, and I don’t care who you are, you need support. Whomever Jennifer’s stylist is should be fired. Showing saggy cleavage is not sexy at all. Jen has enough sexy parts to leave the cleavage alone.

  54. WTF says:

    Holy Saggy Boobage Batman

  55. Tara says:

    If those are considered saggy, Im screwed!!😂

  56. Cindy says:

    I think she looks amazing. Her boobs really are not saggy, they are just real breasts and she is 45. I am 43, and for everyone who is so harsh, you will get here too! Like jennifer or not, her body is incredible. I wish I looked that good, and I work hard to take care of myself.

  57. TeresaMaria says:

    I’m aware that I will bring a lot of hate on myself, but I couldn’t help but wonder … is the deep cleavage-thing Jennifer’s been doing recently, some kind of a passive-agressive shade on Angelina?

    • OliviaPope says:

      Huh? In what way? Why does everything that this woman do have to be associated with jolie? Weirdest thing I have ever come across.

    • Maya says:

      @TheresaMaria: Frankly no – this is just Classic Jennifer Aniston who has been showing her nipples and boobs the past 20 years. It’s her way of saying – look at me.

      She is known as Nippleston for a reason…

    • meh says:

      Does anyone else think Justin’s suit jacket looks way too small on him? Like too short, and the top button is really pulling. Or am I just seeing things?

      • GoOnGirl! says:

        No you are not seeing things. He has to be one of the worse dressed men there is. I have said it before. Why doesn’t Jennifer help him out with his dressing?

    • glynda says:

      Well if this were happening in the same year as the DM announcement u might have a point. Then again you might have one anyway as she’s just that much of a passive aggressive neurotic head case. Like some are saying..she’s been dropping trou since before friends. It’s her way of over compensating for her average face and breaking out of the pack by showing skin. She did it to outshine her friends female castmembers and now I think it’s more to just remind people that she’s not as ugly as that cake movie poster. Which..since that’s her actual face with no makeup…

    • Anastasia says:

      You aren’t the only one who wondered it. She’s always been a minor fan of big cleavage, but it seems like lately it’s really over the top. And often. It just makes me wonder.

      Or it could be just her screaming for attention.

  58. Janie says:

    Oh my! She reminds me of Brynne Edelsten (google her, she is a mess!) in that outfit. A desperate, pathetic try-hard. Justin looks like the orange toxin from his skin has seeped into his pores and he feels very ill. Both of them are beyond a joke.

  59. FingerBinger says:

    Jen’s boobs look fine to me. They’re real and they’re not at her knees.

  60. OliviaPope says:

    Wow! To some of these comment.sheesh!

    She looks great. The end

  61. daughterofjean says:

    I think she looks fabulous! Very sexy!

  62. Maya says:

    As for people who are saying she has natural boobs – look at the pictures from when she wore the suit and these ones. Her boobs were a lot saggier in the suit so she has difinetely had something done inbetween.

    • Lahdidahbaby says:

      Give it up, Maya. Just please stop.

      • Ethelreda says:

        So in under 2 weeks, Aniston had breast surgery and was sufficiently recovered to wear a very low cut gown on the red carpet?

        Riiiiiiiight……

    • Jaded says:

      Maya, it’s called boob tape.

      • Maya says:

        Oh please – she is not wearing any tape. There are pictures of Jennifer bending down while using her hands to make sure her boobs don’t escape from the dress.

        If she wore a tape – that move would have been unnecessary.

      • The Original G says:

        Without a doubt, it’s boob tape. That wouldn’t stop me from needing to feel like the girls were buttoned up.

        I don’t really expect anyone in HW to have natural ANYTHING. It nice when it look natural, though.

    • Elly says:

      Move on

    • MariPoodle says:

      There is such a thing known as boob tape. I’ve used it.

  63. anne_000 says:

    This couple likes to wear clothes that were meant for taller people with leaner figures.

    She’s way to short and wide for this dress.

    She needs to stop wearing white underwear under sheer, darker clothing, because really…..

  64. jojo says:

    The only problem I have with it is her style in general. Most actresses evolve their style as they get older. What they wore in their 20′s is vastly different than what they wore in their 40s. Anotherwords, they matured into a different style.

    Looking at Aniston is like watching a rerun of friends. She’s stuck in that endless rachel style. I was hoping to see some growth over the last 20 years, and seeing her make one non-RomCom got my hopes up. But her style is still in the 90s.

  65. Kim1 says:

    I really doubt a woman who just talked about wanting to and trying to have a baby in InStyle magazine would “joke” about going through menopause .
    She looks good from neck up IMO.The dress is not flattering for her body.They both need to stay away from tanning spray.

  66. Jane says:

    I wish people would quit complaining about her natural bust line. She looks good and she looks natural. The natural slope of her breasts looks far sexier than two boulders jutting out on a skeletal chest.

    The dress is not so good. The color is dull (although I like the sheer black) and the pattern looks like some old wall paper I removed from my 1920 house. I also don’t like that she threw on basically a pair of tightie whities under it. If you are going to wear see thru, at least pick something more interesting to see than plain white underwear.

    • SnowGlow says:

      I agree with everything you said about her chest. I think we are so used to seeing only younger women wearing low cut stuff, that the sight of an older woman wearing something low cut is sort of shocking. Breast sag people and that’s ok.

  67. SnowGlow says:

    Great dress, terrible on her. It makes her look huge as if she has no waist. And please stop with the body chains those things are sooo last year.

  68. KatyD says:

    Imo, the low V cut looks bad on all women–it doesn’t matter if they’re young or old. It just screams desperate for attention, tacky and classless. It makes good cleavage look bad. It’s certainly not fashion forward, or interesting, unless you like looking at swinging objects. This look would be perfect for a stripper and not a movie star.

  69. Paige says:

    Her boobs don’t look saggy but the dress she’s wearing doesn’t make her boobs look great. Plus, It isn’t the right cut for someone her height and the design is a little dated.

  70. Jana says:

    I think we are so used to seeing all the fake Hollywood boobs standing at attention, people can’t even appreciate what natural looking breasts look like….if I had her body, I wouldn’t be wearing a bra to the grocery store, let alone an awards show.

  71. Lady D says:

    Maybe Jen didn’t wear nude coloured panties because she didn’t want to be accused of going commando?

  72. Charlotte_ says:

    I think she looks great, its her best look in 10 years! A bit too orange but she loves it.
    I bet this was her oscar dress, will she go to the oscars? I dont think so.
    Her hair looks good, its the best she can do for the shape of her face. And it looks good with that dress. Jennifer is not pretty with her hair up and she knows it.

  73. Josefa says:

    The thong is really distracting, but this is the best look she’s worn in a long time. Kudos, Jen.

    • Penelope says:

      If the thong is totally distracting she hardly deserves kudos. One mistake can make a big difference and the visible undies ruined her look.

  74. Josephine says:

    I think the vast majority of people who don’t love the look think it is simply unflattering, not that she doesn’t have a great shape.

    Sick of the “you don’t know what natural b**bs look like” line. You can be very familiar with the natural shape of a woman and at the same time think that a little support is a nicer look on the red carpet, and more flattering. Is the same brigade advocating for the braless look also asking that these women get their noses back, skip the make-up, lose the hideous extensions, and stop using the fillers/injections, or are we satisfied with fake everything except the breasts?

    I find the hideous horse hair much more offensive than a bra, but hey, to each their own.

  75. poppy says:

    the cut of the top is spread too wide.
    color is excellent.
    the panties -no. i thought the rule was to go a shade or 2 darker than your skin tone? definitely NOT lighter.

  76. The Original G says:

    Uh, she wore that dress so that we would talk about her.

    The idea that the conversation is one sided is disproved by reading the thread. All celebs get dissed over their fashion. Some of her fans just love to feel sorry for her.

  77. TW says:

    See through to panties big mistake by stylist. Need to take those try on pics in similar lighting. Too bad, a significant mistake that undermines what she’s otherwise achieving. All else looks quite good.

  78. MeloMelo says:

    I really like the whole outfit, I just wish she had done something different with the hair.

  79. Bere says:

    She is slowly turning into Goldie Hawn

  80. Miss D says:

    The dress is beautiful, but her boobs…

  81. Anastasia says:

    As someone who is 44, I do have to say, all the jokes about her being so saggy are starting to get to me. My boobs do NOT look as good as hers, primarily because I’ve gained and lost weight through pregnancy and breastfed with them. Plus they were always larger than hers, and larger = more droop.

    I think what bugs me about her isn’t where her breasts hang, but her constant need for attention combined with the fact that she is about the most boring person alive. Like at least if you demand attention, BE INTERESTING. Be clever, or funny, or talented, or SOMETHING. It’s like she wants all this attention, but you turn to her and just see this bland slightly orange person with all the depth of a puddle. I mean, I could say that about pretty much any other wanna be in LA or Hollywood. The only difference for her is she got incredibly lucky with an extremely popular long running sitcom, and then married an incredibly famous man. That’s it.

  82. eliza says:

    The boobs desperately need to be lifted. Her stylist could used that boob tape or those half bra things that lift just a smidge. The thing is tacky. I would have lined the dress. In truth, I would have burned the dress and selected a different one.

  83. lola says:

    She is beautiful no matter what she wears. And he is hot. What a great couple.

  84. DottieDot says:

    Give it up – she looked great!

  85. BlueeJay says:

    You guys wonder why she is still relevant. Well it is because posts of her like this one get close to 300 comments. If you want her to fade into oblivion stop posting. As long as you keep posting the stories will keep coming.

    With that said I am personally so tired of women dragging other women down. Who really cares what they wear. For too long women have been judgmental and pathetic. This post shows exactly what I mean. And for those who says it’s time to put the girls away – why. Natural breasts are great – love it. Hope that women feel safe enough to do this at 70. Real bodies we need to see more of them. Perhaps that will help young men realize that not all breasts look like those in playboy.

    • Tarsha says:

      Blueejay, that’s a strange position to take, considering you have no problem dragging a certain other female celebrity down yourself. Should I name her to remind you?

  86. Sass back says:

    Idk how people say that Aniston plays the poor me act. Like Brandi Glanville does the poor me act. Aniston lives a fabulous life and she’s in great shape, she’s so likeable on screen even if her movies are subpar, and she’s banging Justin Theroux. I don’t get how she’s fake or pretends to be something she isn’t. I don’t get why people think that she’s not allowed to experiment and try some Oscar fare after doing comedy for years. Do people do this to men who try drama and Oscar fare after comedy? Did people spill the amount of hate on Jonah Hill and Steve Carell and Jim Carrey? And she shows off her body in tasteful ways. You know who is always in trashy dresses? Kate Hudson. Are people giving her a hard time?

    • ididn'tdoit says:

      Exactly! She looks beautiful. She seems like an incredibly warm and lovely person. Sick of all the bitter comments about her. Her ex husband has said so many times that she is incredibly warm and drew people to her like the warmth of a fire. Give it up.

  87. mnice says:

    gorgeous body
    wow
    perfect – not icky skinny

  88. perplexed says:

    Wrong spot.

  89. TC says:

    So I guess her over the top, cleavage-bearing outfits from the CCAs and the SAGs is to divert attention away from the massive critical and commercial failure of Cake?

    • GoOnGirl! says:

      You hit it on the head. Most of the reviews for her performance in Cake have been awful. That said, if she shows more skin, the hope is that people will forget how awful the movie is and talk about her clothing. It worked. Although how she managed to even mount an Oscar attempt is beyond me. Especially with an embargo on the reviews.

  90. Jog says:

    Are saggy knockers in right now? Because JLaw has opted for the same awful look recently.

  91. Sue says:

    This is the best dress I’ve ever seen her in, she looks amazing to me!
    To me this is the ultimate look for Aniston. Not too thin. Seriously this woman has game.

    I feel like less than 10 percent of women (of ANY age and even to include non women like developing 12 year olds) have these crazy-high-no-over-hang boobs many commenters here are talking about ? Right…? There’s so much talk of saggy boobs on this site. Where do commenters see all these high boobs….? Even models in Playboy usually have a decent amount of sag. Are boobs not supposed to have any hang and also all have to start like 2 inches bellow the clavicle ?

  92. Jag says:

    The color of the dress is awful on her, she looks orange, the cut of the dress does her no favors, and she shouldn’t be wearing granny panties under it. She also looks much better with darker hair, imo.

    Something nice – her cleavage looks better than in the other dress, I like that hairstyle on her, and she looks happy.

  93. Crumpet says:

    Everyone knows that underwear can show through with flash photography – I’m sure they never saw the underwear until now. At least she is wearing some!

    She looks great – healthy and glowing.

  94. Crumpet says:

    Wow. This thread was worth just for the Debbie Reynalds 411.

  95. glynda says:

    Dear Perplexed. If the only examples you can come up with for other women behaving like Aniston: are an example of Debbie Reynolds discussing something 60 years ago..and Nicole Kidman who, by the way, was largely thought of as strong and immediately ok after her marriage ended and was even used by a lot of people to CONTRAST with Aniston who was the opposite of that! *(Even in Aniston’s sobbing tell all (vanity fair) kidman was represented by the interviewer as someone for aniston to aspire to for getting over it with her much repeated David Letterman line ‘I can wear heels again,’ cited as an example) – then even you must know…your point is weak.

  96. Sara says:

    I think she looks really good here but I have always thought that type of cut on a dress or shirt a bit repulsive for some reason. It like ewww rather than sexy IMO.

  97. nicolenm says:

    I’m usually not crazy about her outfits, they’re not bad but a little boring. I really like this dress though. She looks great here even if it is a bit see through. Although that’s probably from the cameras flashing.