Star: Jennifer Aniston feels ‘humiliated’ by Justin’s new thing with Emma Stone

87th Annual Oscars Red Carpet Arrivals

Star Magazine’s latest cover story is all about Justin Theroux, Jennifer Aniston and Emma Stone, aka The New Uncool Bermuda Triangle. Personally, I believe Emma and Justin are a thing, in spite of their vague denials. They’re just spending too much time together for it to be a “just friends” situation. What I’m not sure of? Whether Jennifer Aniston really cares. I already shared my concern that it feels like Jen is under-reacting to her split, possibly because… she and Justin might not even really be married? I don’t know. And she’s definitely not acting depressed about this split at all. So do you think Jennifer is sitting in Bel Air, yelling at the pool (not the ocean) about Justin and Emma? Star would have you believe she’s super-concerned.

Jen has had enough: “Jen is left wondering whether Justin was staying true to her during the last months of their marriage. She wants some answers,” says an insider.

Jen was aghast when she saw the photos of Emma & Justin in France: “Jen can see there are sparks there. She’s telling friends that this was a very tacky maneuver, since she and Justin are going through a divorce. He could have waited a few more months before flaunting a famous new girlfriend – who, by the way, used to be a friend of Jen’s. Not anymore!”

Jen is Forever Haunted by Brangelina: “This has brought back unpleasant memories of Brad and Angelina, and Jen wants a clear sense of the timeline between Justin and Emma,” says the source, who adds that Jen is especially suspicious of Justin’s attempts to keep his rendezvous hush-hush – like when he and Emma donned low-slung baseball caps for an early-May sushi date in NYC. “This cloak-and-dagger stuff isn’t really fooling anybody, and certainly not Jen. Justin assured Jen that he and Emma were just friends, but she no longer believes him.”

Jen just doesn’t want to be publicly humiliated: The source insists that “it was clear Justin wasn’t happy in the marriage, he likes the New York hipster scene, while she loves her California sunshine. She accepts that they tried and it didn’t work out – but she isn’t willing to accept another bout of humiliation from a husband. She doesn’t want Justin back but she does want him to be straight with her. It’s a huge betrayal.”

[From Star Magazine, print edition]

What I agree with: the Emma-Justin stuff (whatever IT is) is tacky and their little “we’re not really together y’all!” games aren’t fooling anyone. What I don’t believe: that Jen is suddenly really upset about all of this. What I kept thinking about as this source went on and on about Jen Forever Betrayed is… yeah, but Justin did the same to Heidi Bivens WITH Jennifer. He humiliated Heidi, he set up his relationship with Jennifer months before he really broke it off with Heidi, and Heidi had every right to feel betrayed. But I guess the tabloids love this familiar narrative: Jennifer dumped again for a younger woman, Jennifer betrayed, Jennifer humiliated. I think it’s more like “Jennifer is just living her life with her dogs and her girlfriends,” but whatever.

Emma Stone and Jaden Smith attend LVMH Prize 2018 Edition At Louis Vuitton Foundation

Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux have separated

Photos courtesy of WENN, Backgrid, Star Magazine.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

112 Responses to “Star: Jennifer Aniston feels ‘humiliated’ by Justin’s new thing with Emma Stone”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. grabbyhands says:

    She should just take strength in the fact that he’s outed himself yet again as a sad, douchebag, mid-life crisis stereotype and send a sympathy card to Emma Stone for her crappy taste in men.

    • tracking says:

      +1 Although I don’t believe Star has credible sourcing, so I doubt any of this is true. if anything, she’s probably mad at herself for believing whatever act he fed her.

    • Anna says:

      Emma Stone lost her trucking mind and a helluva lot of credibility in my books.

    • minx says:

      JA had the same crappy taste in men, then, because she married the guy.

      • Carmen says:

        Did she, though? That seems to be the million-dollar question. I personally think the marriage was a fake but time will tell.

      • minx says:

        Yes, maybe they weren’t really married. But she presented herself as married and she took him on as a partner for those years. I think he’s always been the way he is, he didn’t suddenly become a douche when they split.

    • Shannon says:

      Agreed. I do think what happened between her & Brad really did hurt. On this one, I think she’s just like, “Whatever. Sorry for your luck, Emma” She’s older, richer and doesn’t seem to have babies on her mind. I think this is typical tabloid fan-fiction and a narrative I think all of us (including Jen) are pretty sick of.

    • Seraphina says:

      I agree. Especially with the statement that this shows Emma has terrible taste in men. Come on Emma, ugh.

      • Kosmos says:

        If this story is true, then shame on you, Emma…..! Also, you DO have lousy taste in men if you’re taking up with Justin, especially after being Jen’s friend. Ugh! I liked you before this, but that changes now. As for Justin, horrible–not relationship material.

  2. Jenns says:

    If anyone should be humiliated, it’s Emma. Because if she and Justin are a thing, then she’s being used by an “arty” and “edgy”, jort loving, social climber.

  3. Vex says:

    “This was a very tacky manoeuvre” is the new “What Angelina did was very uncool”

    But yea, I think she seems super unbothered by all this. My guess is Justin’s EDGY antics have really helped her get over him fast.

    • NoShame says:

      I think that’s because Aniston is the one who did the dumping.

      • Pandy says:

        I think she dumped him too. Gave him lots of space so they could do their own thang …. but bet she figured out/heard that he was not faithful and dumped his skinny @ss fast.

      • JellyBeans says:

        You want to believe that. Oh and to answer your other post, Mr & mrs Smith was about a dysfunctional marriage. The photoshoot was an extension of that. Which you know very well. So you are just looking pitiful and grasping at straws. Also,Pitt had to clarify because the Anistonloon media pounced on him. Notice Aniston never clarified what she mentioned by her 30’s ‘blowed’ comment? So there you go again. ONE example that he clarified. WHERE ARE THE ‘DOZENS’ OF INTERVIEWS? Put up or admit you lied and rewrote history.

  4. Moonie says:

    This completely puts me off emma stone. And i usually love her!

  5. boredblond says:

    As usual, the tabs are so lazy they just recycle old month they’ll claim she’s distraught because she either is or isn’t pregnant..flip a coin..

  6. bma says:

    I think deep down Jennifer always knew this was not going to pan out for reasons both in and outside of her control. I think it came as no surprise to her this didn’t work out and I’m not convinced that she isn’t the one who did the dumping. It seems to me that she’s at least publicly unbothered by the whole thing.

    • tracking says:


    • Ashley says:


    • Kosmos says:

      I know…..Wish that Jennifer had never ever taken to Justin. He’s just not right for the long term kind of thing, and she needs that for a change. Maybe he was there when she was a bit lonely and then it just happened, but Ugh, after he left Heidi, and now Jen, he’s just not a good prospect in my book for any woman other than a fling thing.

  7. Gutterflower says:

    What is his appeal???

  8. minx says:

    JT seems to have a lot of friends so at first I thought he and ES were just that, or friends with benefits. But they do seem involved now.

  9. wheneight says:

    I honestly thought he would have trouble dating famous women after their breakup. Who wants to be seen dating Jennifer Aniston’s (RACHEL’S!!) philandering, douchey ex-husband? Boy was a wrong. Not a classy look on Emma Stone.

  10. Darla says:

    I liked Stone with Garfield. This is a big downgrade, if true. And if she’s friends with JA, trash move. But who knows.

    • NoShame says:

      It’s a trash move either way. Stone is clearly helping Theroux with this PR. They aren’t just doing photos because they work for LV. They’ve staged a bunch of other photos too. Emma has been famous long enough to know this will end up in the tabs at Jen’s expense.

    • tracking says:

      Eh, I don’t know that it’s a trash move. Aniston and Stone are professional acquaintances, not good friends. Stone doesn’t owe her anything, but clearly she became friends or more with Theroux. If they didn’t hook up prior to the split, then it’s really not an issue. I’m only surprised Stone doesn’t seem all that concerned about potential blowback.

  11. Mego says:

    The press Is desperately trying to keep the poor rejected Jen narrative alive but in truth that only worked while Brangelina was a thing and after 10 years even that was getting old. Now that Brangelina is over it simply doesn’t matter to anyone if JA finds happiness with another man. In truth, at 50 years old she will likely be happier single and I say that as a 50 year old married woman who finally realizes that I don’t need a man to be happy.

    • Darla says:

      I remember when I was young hearing older women talk like this and not understanding it. I heard women, even in my own family, dreaming about escape and a peaceful life in a small apartment alone.

      Now at 50, I get it.

      • Samab says:

        Darling here’s a 37 who jump on that train too…. I’m in a 19 years relationship and if it will ever end I firmly believe nothing will convince me in getting in another thing like this.Even if there’s love.Each one in his place.Space.

    • Harla says:

      50+ women unite!!! I’ve been so tired of the poor rejected Jen narrative for years now and I’m pretty sure Jen is too. It seems like Jen has a really wonderful life with her dogs, friends, yoga and house renovating, we can dream!! Lol My hubby and I are celebrating our 19th anniversary today and have a great marriage, largely in part due to the fact that he works out of town for 2 weeks then comes home for 2 weeks. Just about the time I’m ready for “me” time he’s off to work and when I start missing him, he’s coming home.

      • Darla says:

        It sounds like you have the best of both worlds Harla!

        As for Jen, she also has a lot of projects in the works, she’s going back to tv, which I thought she should have done years ago. It would take some suspension of disbelief for me to buy she’s sitting around crying over this fool.

      • Kosmos says:

        You’re right, JEN does have a really good life, agreed. But even people who have everything want love or a companion in life. I can understand that. At least she’s set for money and can now find someone much better than Justin T. He just wasn’t “the one.”

  12. Mgsota says:

    I just don’t buy it. The pictures of them had 0 chemistry/I’m into you kind of vibes.

    • Josephine says:

      I don’t buy it either, but their separation created a void of a story line so something has to fill that void. It looks like JA and JT are both just living their lives. Many of the pics of him are from work-related events and despite no pic suggesting anything more, he keeps getting paired with woman after woman.

      Is it so terribly hard for us to believe that two people broke up because the relationship ran its course?

      • NoShame says:

        Maybe, but then why did he send his sources out to make all those nasty comments about Aniston? He’s been trashing her through E!, People Mag, Page Six etc. I think Aniston was happy to have a quiet break up. Him, not so much.

      • NoShame says:

        @Jellybeans. Are you referring to the husband who dumped her to run off with another woman and got that woman pregnant before his divorce was even finalized? The husband who literally spent a decade trashing their life together in interviews? That husband?

      • Chrissie says:

        Yep JB. I think the Anistonloons from DListed and FF landed. They always spin everything the exact opposite. Oh, and NoShame (apt name), Aniston got with VV before Pitt even got Angelina pregnant. Then again Aniston always has moved fast on men.

      • NoShame says:

        @Jellbean. Are you serious? He started off with the W photo spread posing with a fake family to promote a film that had zero kids in it. And then gave a dozen interviews about his boring, dead end life knowing full well how the press would read that.

        Brad was even trashing their life together ten years after they split in that Parade interview so the idea that he didn’t do anything help move this triangle along for years is ridiculous.

        And every time Aniston was asked about various comments, she’d get blamed for responding, like she was some sort of crazy lady stalker.

        I’m willing to bet if the genders were reversed we’d be having a completely different conversation about all of this.

      • JellyBeans says:

        Are you serious? He did one photoshoot for work to promote a movie. And he made precisely 2 comments about Aniston in 15 years, not ‘dozens’. Aniston never did a single interview without making a passive aggressive dig at Pitt or Angelina and the children. Not…one. She even grinning while being introed by Handler, on 2 (two) separate occasions. As well as mocking having a twin on each hip in her GQ interview. Clearly you are rewriting history and convincing yourself, but Pitt has made TWO comments about Aniston in 15 years. She has not gone one year without referencing Pitt, she even dragged him up during her Cake campaign. So please stop lying.

        Oh and enough! She is Jennifer Aniston! She CHOSE to answer questions! She could make sure they were never asked. She okays questions before being interviewed, she she knows what she will be asked. She has never knocked back a question about Brangelina. Hell would freeze over before she would knock a question about that subject back! Funny how you think Aniston would get blamed for responding to comments, but don’t extend the same argument for Pitt. Aniston is media savvy, she knows the power of responding and the tenor of her responses. You are a brainwashed faniston, reasoning with you is pointless.
        PPS Aniston said her 30s ‘blowed’ but I guess that is ok with a hypocrite like you! Pitt never said one bad word against her. Aniston as well ALL KNOW has gone WAY OUT OF HER WAY to get digs in at her ex and the MOTHER OF HIS CHILDREN for 11 years. She is hateful, demented, stalking nutjob who got where she is because she was dumped by Pitt and spent 11 years dragging him through the mud. Pitt showed more restraint, class and grace than any other human would when their ex bunnyboiler has spent 11 years bad-mouthing them to any print or tele media that will listen.

        Edit: lastly, provide examples of these ‘dozens’ of interviews he did, or admit you are deliberately exaggerating and LYING.

      • JellyBeans says:

        double post sorry.

      • Lady D says:

        The husband who literally spent a decade trashing their life together in interviews? That husband?
        He mentioned her twice in that decade. Where do you get these “dozens of interviews trashing her” from? It was Jennifer that gave nonstop interviews trashing him, I mean she gave hundreds of snide, backhanded interviews about him. Remember the delicate one screaming her pain out at the ocean? So brave.

    • NoShame says:

      We’ll have to agree to disagree. It’s ironic to be accused of rewriting history by someone rewriting history. Given the PR games he’s been playing with Angelina AND Neri Oxman, do you really believe this is the first time ever that Brad Pitt is playing PR games?

      Btw, that W photoshoot with 60 plus photos, including a whole bunch of kids for a film that had no kids in it is hilarious. Nothing passive aggressive about that at all. LOL. Remember, Brad kept the rights to those photos so they weren’t simply meant to promote the film, the film with no kids in it.

      And why drag Brad into this story at all? This story is about Emma Stone. It’s not Aniston who doesn’t want to let this go.

      • JellyBeans says:

        NoShame again it was to promote a movie. A dysfunctional family. You clearly chose to see more into it because it suited your fan agenda.
        I asked for examples of these “dozens” of interviews. Where are they? He made precisely two comments about Aniston (including referring to his marriage as dull which Aniston said her 30s ‘blowed’ so where are these ‘dozens’ of interviews? Brad hasn’t even given ‘dozens’ of interviews all up, in 20 years. Let alone 11. Or 10. Let alone about his ex-wife. So provide these ‘dozens’ of articles that is a figment of your desperate imagination. Or is it simply that you did indeed rewrite history? Which is quite obvious when anyone reads your absurd posts? You have accused Brad of doing everything that Aniston is doing. So I ask again. Where are these ‘dozens’ of interviews? Provide proof or admit you lied. Facts are facts, and you are caught out making up outrageous lies that you cannot back up because you want to live in your own fantasy world. This isn’t disagreeing over an opinion. This is about FACTS and evidence. So? Put up.

      • Chrissie says:

        Well said JellyBeans. I’ve seen the lies by those like NoShame, they hate being called on it. I mean we all read Aniston laughing at cartoon of her shooting Jolie in Vogue. We all read her mocking having a twin on each hip in Vogue interview. We all saw her SmartWater ad where she played a pregnant woman with twins. We all saw her walk on Chelsea’s stage on cue, grinning like a cheshire cat, not once but twice after Handler introed her by making racist comments about Pitt/Jolie’s children. We all saw how she dragged up Pitt for Cake. We all read and saw etc etc ad nauseam Aniston getting in jabs at the JPs for over a decade. Pitt hasn’t ever said one bad word against her. Jolie hasn’t mentioned her at all.

        It seems to the anistonloons that the JPs simply living their lives and doing interviews about their movie projects is somehow a stab at Aniston. Lets forget how Aniston has made jabs at them repeatedly. Thats ok. I’ve asked Anistonloonies where and when has Pitt (or Jolie) ever made any passive aggressive comments against Aniston. They can never, Never, EVER give even one example. Only thing they can offer is he said his marriage was boring. When he actually said HE was boring. However, Aniston said her 30s ‘blowed’ as you said, and she was married to Pitt at the time. Response from the Anistonloons….? Crickets…..

        The Anistonloons never think they will be called out on their nonsense. They suffer the same Cult brainwashing and delusions as the Trumpsters. Where facts are lies and rewriting history is facts. Which is ironic really because reading comments from fanistons on twitter and facebook, most seem to be Trump supporters believe it or not. Most of them do seem to be racist as well, so make of that what you will.

      • JellyBeans says:

        Thanks Chrissie and yep, I’ve noticed many Aniston fans are Trump supporters. Its just the caliber of people they are.

    • NoShame says:

      There you go again JellyBean rewriting history and now rebranding Mr. and Mrs. Smith as a film about a dysfunctional FAMILY. There are no kids in that movie!!!

      As for Pitt never trashing Aniston. Brad Pitt literally had to apologize for trashing Aniston in 2011 because he was still passively aggressively trashing their life together 7 years after they split.

      This is getting ridiculous. As I said in the beginning, Aniston fans did not bring Pitt into this convo. You bring him up and then claim Aniston fans are the ones who can’t let go. LOL

      As for Chrissie, seriously, claiming you know Aniston laughed at Jolie and some cartoon. Please provide links you want from everyone else. As well as proof that Aniston fans are racist Trump supporters.

      Talk about cult like lunacy. Unbelievable.

      • Nancy says:

        OMG, she said Jennifer fans are trump supporters! Funniest thing I’ve read in a long, long time. Poor dat. Somebody has way too much time on their hands. Haha, I can’t get over the blatant ignorance of that statement, but it is funny how people are.

      • JellyBeans says:

        Mr & Mrs Smith was about a dysfunctional marriage. The photoshoot was an extension of that. Which you know very well. So you are just looking pitiful and grasping at straws. Also,Pitt had to clarify because the Anistonloon media pounced on him. Notice Aniston never clarified what she mentioned by her 30′s ‘blowed’ comment? So there you go again. ONE example that he clarified. WHERE ARE THE ‘DOZENS’ OF INTERVIEWS? Put up or admit you lied and rewrote history. Oh an Aniston laughed at a cartoon about her shooting Angelina in the same Vogue interview where she called Angelina ‘uncool’. Isn’t it interesting that you can’t seem to give me 1 (one) example of Pitt making attacks against ANISTON *EXCEPT* for the one where he was talking about himself – let alone ‘dozens’ yet you conveniently ‘forget’ all the interviews where Aniston slammed Brad, Angelina and his kids? Seriously, it is getting ridiculous now.

        AGAIN, I ask for examples of the “DOZENS” of interviews where Brad attacked Jennifer. Just one. Two? Five? Ok, I’ll settle for two?

        Nancy – a LOT of Aniston fans ARE Trump supporters. That is simply fact. Sorry you are too blatantly ignorant to see this. And the amount of Anistonloons who have called her adopted children ‘bastards’, ‘black bastards’, ‘foreign trash’ etc I lost count of. I was not an original Jolie supporter. But I noticed over the years how immoral, racist, hateful and evil Aniston supporters are. They will do anything, such as LIE like NoShame does, despite the FACT that Pitt has *NEVER* said ONE…..WORD against Aniston, when Aniston has, as is *PROVEN* spent 11 years aggressively hounding, stalking and harassing her ex, the mother of his children AND HIS CHILDREN, so much so that even THE MEDIA called Aniston out for it. As I said and as backs me up, it is an unhinged cult where they accuse the opposite of everything their idol has done for ELEVEN YEARS.

      • Nancy says:

        Receipts. Most of us liberals who follow the liberal Hollywood stars are ANTI-TRUMP. You can type your five pages on the horrors of Jennifer and her fans and it means zero to me. I can’t invest that much hate on anyone. Sorry.

  13. lightpurple says:

    ” … are going through a divorce.” Has either of them actually filed anything?

    • Carmen says:

      As far as anyone can tell, no. Then again, you don’t need to divorce if you were never married in the first place.

  14. Danielle says:

    I’m just so confused. Wasn’t there a story about Emma and Andrew being back together just a few days before all this?? Or was that some sort of a fevered dream I concocted? I loved them together.

  15. Anguishedcorn says:

    She humiliated herself when she tried to morph into a Malibu-Hipster to fit in with him. I don’t think she needs Justin’s help to be humiliated in this situation.

    • JellyBeanies says:

      Well said.

    • Svea says:

      She seemed completely unchanged to me. Now, if she’d moved to NY and started wearing motorcycle boots to keep up with his “edginess” that would have been a different story.
      It cracks me up that he wants to live in NY, where Emma is, but he is barely here. Also he’s one of those hated people who makes life hell for his neighbors.

    • whatWHAT? says:

      huh? she didn’t “morph” at all. I agree with Svea.

      he’s the one that became the plucked, bronzed, coiffed, manicured, dressed-by-high-end-designers morph, after living a life of literal dumpster diving.

      the pre-JA Theroux would NEVER have repped Vuitton or sat front-and-center at fashion shows or played on a yacht with other celebs.

  16. Other Renee says:

    If it’s true, I’d be disappointed in Emma but it’s her life to waste on the hipster. As for Jen, no tears there. Not after what she did to Heidi. That was just too low.

  17. Fifi says:

    I no longer like emma stone.

    Just enough with beautiful a-listers dating old men who would prefer to date girls. I say this as a woman in her early 20s. I’m sick of ageism towards women and young women who fuel these men’s egos. It leaks into real life and the men around me believe that no matter how old they are – they can always have someone young enough to be their daughter. I see men around me with mail order brides all the time and I’m sick of it. It’s getting worse.

    He’s nothing special. She can do so much better.
    Makes me feel like I will get dumped for someone half my age when I’m older so I’m no longer giving money to anything that promotes this. Over it.

    If people can hate on women like kim k for being a famous narcissist or nepotism kids…I’m allowed to dislike women who encourage other women to date men old enough to be their fathers. I’m also allowed to dislike men who won’t look or consider women their own age and instead choose girls under the age of 25. (looking at you leonardo dipervio)

    • Other Renee says:

      Fifi, Dipervio… I love it!

    • Snowflake says:

      Yeah, it made me feel really insecure in my 30s to see guys my age wanting to date younger women. Finally, I met a man who wanted a relationship with a woman his own age. We’ve been married for 5 years now.

    • Jenn says:

      @Fifi your comment makes me cringe because i feel the same way now – yet wasted about five years in my thirties with a guy 20 years older than me.
      I was so insecure! I don’t know if that’s the case with all women that do this but I feel like it’s a factor for a lot of women that do it. In your thirties already many men your age are wanting younger women than you. I realized on a certain level what I was doing in my thirties and it did make me uncomfortable to a certain extent – but i felt like there were so few men who wanted what I did who were my age. The irony is … neither did my 50 something bf! But he played me like there was a chance.

      I Almost missed out on having a family due to dating a man child in his fifties. I honestly thought I couldn’t do better.
      Thank God I eventually ditched him, I realized my worth with or without ANYONE – and found a man my age who loved me for me – and even got to have a family! (I’m in my early forties and pregnant with number two)! My dream! – I’d given up because I had “missed out”… I was so negative and insecure! Read too many articles basically telling 35+ women to dream on.
      My Gorgeous little sister is now with a guy twenty years her senior (who is playing her … she too wanted kids but he’s talking her out if it) and I’m so WHY???! But I cant say shit because I did the same.

    • ellie says:

      I agree and women kind of doom themselves by dating much older. If the relationship happens to not workout when you get older, well you will find yourself in the same cycle with the available men wanting younger

      • Jenn says:

        Supposedly statistics wise the further apart in age a couple is, the less chance their relationship will last. I’ve read this in a few articles recently.
        And, the closer in age, the more chance a couple will stay together.

        Like once it gets toward 15-20 years apart the stats are crazy low.

        Though, I think back in the 80s and certainly before that May-December relationships lasted longer or even a lifetime because society was so different (women were so discriminated against even legally).

        It was more normal.

        Like my parents were 15 years apart and a good amount of our family friends had a similar gap.

    • Ladiabla says:

      Thank you for saying this Fifi!

  18. Anare says:

    Don’t marriages have to be registered? I think it’s a public record. Should be easy enough to find out if they were legally married.

    • tracking says:

      They could have applied for a confidential license, which means no public record. But divorce is always a matter of public record, which is why many are wondering why neither has filed. Either the property settlement negotiations are ongoing or they never filed the paperwork after the ceremony, perhaps because they couldn’t come to terms on a prenup.

      • Carmen says:

        I believe (correct me if I’m wrong) that the difference between a regular marriage license and a confidential license is that anyone can see a regular license. The contents are public record. In a confidential license there is a record of a license being filed, but you need a court order to make the contents public.

        Then there is a also a secret license, which means there is no record at all of a license having been filed. Only two states have secret licenses, and California isn’t one of them.

  19. SJhere says:

    I call BS. They are divorcing and moving on with seperate lives.
    JA is very wealthy and has every opportunity in the world at her fingertips.
    Justin is having a typical male mid-life crisis, including dressing like a 20 y/o and getting all the publicity he can with a female 10-20 years younger. He was with JA as a career move.

    She has zero reason to be “humiliated”. What a load of old fashioned BS. If this is her PR trying to paint her as a victim or poor Jen, she should fire them at once.

    • Lady D says:

      I think Jen came out of this one the winner. She’s clearly moving on with a life that makes her happy and feeling no need to have this negativity in her life. Jen’s living the good life, he’s pretending he is.

  20. aang says:

    If she wasn’t humiliated by posing with him in those leather pants I doubt she is humiliated by much.

  21. gemcat says:

    …I think there was more chemistry in the Sienna Miller photos then the Emma Stone on balcony-ones…and yeah, out of the two I’d bet my money on Sienna going there, rather than Emma.. also hear hear on ‘bangable in and due to the leftovers’…mind you him hanging out with the Queer Eye guys also made him hot. Him and and Antoni, damn!!

  22. Felicia says:

    Heh, if I were her publicist, I’d absolutely make sure that Theroux gets referred to in every article as “Aniston’s leftovers”. Lolol

  23. JellyBeans says:

    What goes around comes around. She humiliated Heidi when she and Justin did that photoshoot with Richardson, only a week after Heidi fled their apartment. I hope she is humiliated. After what she did to Brad and Angelina, trashing them in every interview for 11 years, and Heidi, karma takes its time. After what she did to Brangelina, and their innocent children, and to Heidi, it is about time she got her karma back. It takes its sweet time, but it is extra delicious when the bad guys finally get it.

    • TomKat says:

      Brad is humiliating Angelina now. You are right JellyBeans, karma takes its time and now Angie got her karma back.

      • gemcat says:

        why keep blaming JUST the women though?… isn’t Brad the one who should be humiliated, and isn’t he? I mean Angelina seems to be doing great!!

      • JellyBeans says:

        How so? Pitt had his alcoholism exposed and lost custody. Angelina wasn’t humiliated at all. Lol sorry.

      • Sullivan says:

        Angelina seems to be just fine, Tomkat. The only karma coming her way has been good karma.

    • gemcat says:

      I think in this case ‘the bad guys’ is primarily Justin though right, you’re not actually holding Jennifer responsible for Justin’s actions I hope? And to be frank, Justin seems to be loving life!
      And I have never read that ‘she did’ anything to those innocent children .. Brad however, he is the one who went into a relationship and family on those terms. That can piss anyone (as the ex) off! And sure she may have played the poor-left-woman card a few times too many, but surely she didn’t do it in a way that affected the Brangelina kids…I mean, come on?! I think we can all see that Jen is not the bad guy WHEN compared to Justin here…

  24. The Original G says:

    I’m pretty sure, and you can look it up – but when people announce they’ve split it means that they can see who they like. Officially.

  25. Jenny says:

    I just came here to say one thing: Jennifer Aniston, poor thing, has the worst taste in men in the history of humanity. I mean come on, Tate Donovan? Vince Vaughn?? John Mayer (that how you spell his name?) Even Brad Pitt. Yuck. And then to top it all off she married this loser. Jen you need to stay single now forever, or get new software for the part of your brain that chooses romantic partners.

    • gemcat says:

      I feel like she might be my dating spirit animal, and that I should learn from that and forever remain single, ha!

  26. Annaloo. says:

    Jennifer is not a victim. This is a hard working, directed and determined woman who does not deserve this definition or these headlines.

  27. khaveman says:

    I just don’t get the appeal of JT. He seems very try-hard, insincere, douchey. Of course, never met the man. I’m just going with how he looks in the press.

    • Svea says:

      He just upped his PR game with the big publicity around adopting a pitbull from Texas, a hurricane survivor. You can’t fault him because it promotes pet adoption. But I still see it all as self promoting.

      • NoShame says:

        Yeah, there’s a complete disconnect from his Instagram account and his general douche behavior. On Instagram he’s just a nice dog owner who loves dogs and occasionally hangs out with his close non scandalous friends.

        It must have taken every ounce of hipster energy he has for him not to post photos on IG from his trip to France. Although, I bet he’s got a million photos of that trip on his Iphone.

  28. Shaz says:

    No one cares who Justin ends up with, including JA I’ll bet.

    • Felicia says:

      Exactly! And it’s hilarious that Mr. Edgy from NYC who hates Hollywood is frolicking on a beach and a yacht in the South of France. Because it really doesn’t get much more cliche than that.

      • NoShame says:

        I feel like he’s gotten MORE Hollywood since they split up. I also love how he sent his friends out to tell everyone he’s some deep intellectual who likes to hang out with all kinds of different people. By different people he clearly means 25 actresses AND 25 year old models. LOL.

  29. Pam_L says:

    Why is Jennifer grabbing and hugging Emma’s ass in those pictures? Don’t throw things at me and I’m just asking but could this have been a threesome that just naturally developed into a twosome?

  30. Darla says:

    I have to be honest, reading these posts, I don’t know this much about my own life. I mean, I’d have to really sit down and think hard to get every detail of my divorce from 10 years ago. And I still wouldn’t have it all straight. To have all of these details and timelines from 15 years ago, that takes commitment.

    • NoShame says:

      There are fans who went ballistic every time Aniston left the house anywhere near a Jolie-Pitt kid’s birthday as if she was literally trying to upstage a 2 year old. It’s more than commitment. It’s total craziness.

      I’ve felt myself going crazy just responding to comments like that when I should know better and just ignore them. Crazy people can make other people just as crazy.

    • whatWHAT? says:

      “commitment”? I have another word for it. but I’ll be nice.

    • Ashley says:

      LOL. You should look at the BRF threads.

  31. Mina says:

    I’m so tired of the tabloid take of Jennifer Aniston being some poor pathetic woman that gets blindsided and humiliated by all her men and she just stays home crying and thinking of how she couldn’t have any kids bla bla bla. I’m sure Jennifer is happy to be rid of Justin Theroux and fortunately Emma Stone will be as well when she sees the light.

  32. CK3 says:

    I’m just going to have to disagree with the majority of the posts and just say “I really don’t mind Justin and Emma.” Justin and Jen are divorcing and were it not for paperwork processing, delays and a few assets that they have to split, it would be over. They’re living different, separate lives now. I see no reason why they shouldn’t find other people for something more than a casual hookup because I doubt they’re going the “celibate until my divorce is finalized route”.

    As for Emma dating an older man, I can’t judge. Chris Hemsworth and Henry Cavill are older than me and I would jump on them in a heartbeat. It’s not like she went into an old folks home in a red dress and sat on Justin’s lap. They probably travel in similar social circles. Emma , career-wise (Oscar + A-list) and age-wise (late twenties), is probably around older actors than she is younger ones (She’s not club hopping with Bella Thorne.)

    • anonymous says:

      Emma should open her eyes and see that Justin is using her for a ticket to the Academy Awards and to stay relevant by being with someone popular in Hollywood. Homeboy would never have gotten a ticket to the Academy Awards without being married to an Alister and wouldn’t be getting an invitation back either, he was nothing before shacking up with Jennifer Aniston and would fall back into obscurity without associating himself with another Alister like Emma. She’s an idiot

      • CK3 says:

        What? This is completely nonsensical. Justin may have “used” Aniston to increase his profile, but the guy is an accomplished actor/writer in his own right coming off of a highly acclaimed HBO show. He’s not one of George Clooney’s waitresses or C-list actress flings. Heck, he wrote “Iron Man 2” prior to ever dating Anistan and had been in multiple films and televisions series, in more than just bit parts before than. Yes, he was B-list in terms of name recognition, but the fact that he co-write Tropic Thunder and was recommended by Robert Downey Jr. himself to write Iron Man 2 (something Jennifer Aniston could never make happen) shows that he had some cache and connections prior to ever shacking up with Aniston.

        If anything, his career slowed down after getting together with Aniston. “The Leftovers” buys him more than enough influence to get a show or two greenlit.