Les Moonves resigns from CBS in disgrace in the wake of a second exposé

Apple Music's Carpool Karaoke: The Series launch party

Back in July, Ronan Farrow’s latest exposé was published in The New Yorker. Farrow had spoken to multiple women who said they had been harassed and victimized by CBS CEO Les Moonves. The women made claims about how Moonves had abused his authority and power in various ways from sexual harassment to actual sexual assault. The reaction to Farrow’s exposé was muted, because Moonves is a powerful guy and because CBS’s toxic boys’ club had been covering up for Moonves (not to mention covering up for “talent” like Charlie Rose) for decades. Moonves denied everything and his wife, Julie Chen, stood by him. But quietly, Moonves and CBS began working on his resignation and his golden parachute. Moonves would go away quietly for a massive price. Except that there are more women, more victims. Ronan Farrow dropped another New Yorker exposé last night – you can read the full piece here.

Members of the board of the CBS Corporation are negotiating with the company’s chairman and C.E.O., Leslie Moonves, about his departure. Sources familiar with the board’s activities said the discussions about Moonves stepping down began several weeks ago, after an article published in the The New Yorker detailed allegations by six women that the media executive had sexually harassed them, and revealed complaints by dozens of others that the culture in some parts of the company tolerated sexual misconduct. Since then, the board has selected outside counsel to lead an investigation into the claims.

As the negotiations continue and shareholders and advocacy groups accuse the board of failing to hold Moonves accountable, new allegations are emerging. Six additional women are now accusing Moonves of sexual harassment or assault in incidents that took place between the nineteen-eighties and the early aughts. They include claims that Moonves forced them to perform oral sex on him, that he exposed himself to them without their consent, and that he used physical violence and intimidation against them. A number of the women also said that Moonves retaliated after they rebuffed him, damaging their careers. Similar frustrations about perceived inaction have prompted another woman to raise a claim of misconduct against Jeff Fager, the executive producer of “60 Minutes,” who previously reported to Moonves as the chairman of CBS News.

[From The New Yorker]

The New Yorker details some of the accusations against Moonves, and all of the new victims who have come forward, including one woman who actually went to the police and had Moonves criminally investigated for sexual assault. Just a few hours after The New Yorker dropped this new article, Moonves resigned (in disgrace), but not before he issued a public statement calling all of his victims liars. CBS announced that Moonves would not receive any “exit compensation,” at least not until the independent investigation was completed. CBS is also adding six new board members and they announced a $20 million donation to “organizations that support the #MeToo movement and workplace equality for women. The donation will be deducted from any severance payments that may be due to Moonves.”

Apple Music's Carpool Karaoke: The Series launch party

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

25 Responses to “Les Moonves resigns from CBS in disgrace in the wake of a second exposé”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Carol says:

    I wonder if the 6 new Board members will include any women?

  2. Snazzy says:

    I read that he was the force behind the janet Jackson blacklist as well. A**hole

    • Nev says:

      Word.
      #NeverForget

    • holly hobby says:

      Yeah I read that. Now we know why Justin moved on (he groveled) and Janet sort of disappeared. Someone posted on Twitter a segment on the view about that debacle and Julie Chen said Janet didn’t apologize – which was not true. This incident played out in the public so I find it hard that Julie didn’t know about the apology and she bought what Les sold her. I think she is complicit. Look the other way to get the lifestyle and career, right Julie?

  3. Jenns says:

    Good. I’m glad he’s out. However, I’m assuming Julie will stick by him. What happens to her now? Is she still going to be on that show?

  4. Tiffany says:

    And take Julie with him. Her attitude towards Janet knowing this douche blackballed her, yeah, she can go too.

  5. Esmom says:

    $20 million that will be deducted from his severance payments? How much is there, ffs? How about donating all of it?

    • Lucy2 says:

      I saw somewhere is was rumored to be $100 million. Considering he had to resign in disgrace after accusations of assault and harassment by multiple women, you think there would be some sort of out in the contract for CBS on that one.

      I truly hope he walks away with nothing from this. Like Matt Lauer before him, the best thing he could do is go away, shut up, and be grateful he’s not in jail where he belongs. But considering Lauer is already trying to come back, I won’t be surprised if this monster does too.

    • Mia4s says:

      If the investigation doesn’t find against him he’s entitled to over $100 million. Sigh…this may be one of the few times the Employer finally has an interest in finding in favour of the victims. Here’s hoping.

  6. MerrymerrymonthofMay says:

    Good. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out, Les Moonveserables!

  7. notthisagain says:

    Good ! Word is he is behind the tanking of Janet Jackson’s career after the ” nipple gate ” incident at the Superbowl years ago. He apparently used his clout with affiliates etc to not play her videos / music /book her for performances etc
    Whist I didn’t buy the whole “wardrobe malfunction” bit, and yes it was inappropriate the punishment /outrage towards Janet IMO overly was so severe and long lasting( Note Timberlakes career never suffered as hers did)

    Apparently Moonves wasn’t just upset about the incident, he was livid that Janet wasn’t sufficiently repentant … We know know what that may have meant

    • Leigh-Klein says:

      But it’s perfectly okay to expose yourself in front of multiple women, all while being married. Flagrant, vile hypocrite.

      • notthisagain says:

        Ok I totally misunderstood your post I thought you were calling me vile
        Need more coffee
        Sorry

  8. Mia4s says:

    I say waaaaaaaay too many “Finally!” tweets when this story first came out. Another open secret. Absolutely vile.

  9. boredblond says:

    I’ll have to look up the whole exit compensation/severance thing, because a 20 mill deduction sure sounds like he’ll be leaving with a ton of money..and since he’s pushing 70 it’s a good bet he would be leaving soon regardless..so his punishment is..what?

    • Emmet says:

      @boredblond – hello!

      If would be a fitting punishment to have that scumbag lose all his power and access.
      Although it seems he will be kept on as an “advisor” for two years.

      Unreal.

      In a woman’s world when you are forced out or fired, you are gone.

  10. adastraperaspera says:

    I think when we find out more about what’s been happening for decades at the highest echelons of all these male dominated organizations, it’s going to make Mad Men look quaint. This behavior isn’t some individual “addiction” or “power trip.” It’s the corruption that results from accountability to no one except the almighty shareholders–more money, more money.

  11. Darla says:

    Until the first story about this, I hadn’t known Chen is his wife. That’s got to be really difficult for her co-stars on the talk. Like, they must all have to kiss her ass, no? And now what do they do?

    As far as he goes, I read the whole story at the link and I am so sick to my stomach. And I am tired of this. These animals need to be weeded out and replaced by women.

    • Amelie says:

      If she hasn’t already, Julie Chen should take a leave of absence. It’s hard to know with the wives of these predators–how much did they know? Are they just in deep denial? I never know if I should feel sympathy for these women. Melania Trump, Camille Cosby (questionable?), Georgina Chapman–did they really have no idea what was going on?

      The only one I truly have sympathy for is Matt Lauer’s wife, Annette Roque. It seems she tried to divorce him years ago and for whatever reason, she didn’t go through with it. Lauer has always struck me as a control freak and I could totally see him emotionally blackmailing his wife (if you divorce me, you’ll never see the kids or whatever) to stay with him. I’m glad she’s now able to be free of him.

  12. Mumbles says:

    I’m angry it took this long. Farrow’s first report, based on Ileana Douglas’s recount, was credible (lots of contemporaneous accounts) and infuriating.

  13. Meg says:

    did you see the article that came out about his having a personal issue with janet Jackson after the super bowl? I remember both janet and Justin apologizing on TV but he only seemed to take Justin’s apology seriously and insisted any radio stations owned by the CBS parent company not play her music. she got a book deal by a publisher owned by the CBS parent company and he was upset about that. Justin tore off her clothes and what resulted after was a mistake but for some reason, race & gender, people blamed janet more than Justin. he groped her on stage but people seem to slut shame women of color more than others

  14. Snap Happy says:

    I was in the audience of the Stephen Colbert show when Jeff Fager and Leslie Stahl were on as guests for the 60 Mins. Anniversary. He just oozes arrogance and sleeze. When I watched the show on TV they cut out most of what he said. He probably nauseated the editors as much as he did me. I’m not surprised he’s being named.

  15. Franklymydear... says:

    God bless you, Ronan Farrow.