Jon Peters says he paid Pamela Anderson’s debts then he dumped her

Jon Peters at the induction ceremony for

I don’t know why Jon Peters and Pamela Anderson’s 12-day marriage has become a major drama involving tell-all interviews to Page Six, but here we go. To recap: in January, Pamela Anderson married Jon Peters out of the blue, with really no advance gossip. They’d known each other for decades but they were not dating seriously or anything. Turns out, the marriage was kind of fake – they didn’t file all of the paperwork, so no harm, no foul, right? Wrong. Pamela’s people said that Peters was controlling and she lost interest in him within days after their wedding. Now Jon Peters says that’s not the case at all – Pamela proposed to HIM, scammed him into paying her debts and then he dumped her, not the other way around. LOL. I’m sorry.

Hollywood producer Jon Peters told Page Six on Monday that his 12-day marriage to Pamela Anderson went bust after he paid off some of the “broke’’ actress’s debts — adding, “There’s no fool like an old fool.” The former hairstylist-to-the-stars, 74, took umbrage at a source telling Page Six last week that he asked her to marry him on a whim — but that within a day and a half, she realized she had “made a terrible mistake’’ and that Peters was “too controlling.’’

Peters, who produced the hit flick “A Star is Born,” retorted to Page Six in an e-mail, “Everything they told you was a lie’’ — including even that he asked Anderson to marry him. He said Anderson, 52, proposed to him in a text. “Needless to say that when she texted me that she wanted to get married, it was kind of a dream come true even though I was engaged to someone else and the lady was moving in,’’ Peters wrote. “I dropped everything for Pam. She had almost $200,000 in bills and no way to pay it so I paid it and this is the thanks I get. There’s no fool like an old fool.’’

Peters implied to Page Six that he told the former “Baywatch” star they were over in a text. A source previously said Anderson felt she had foolishly jumped into the marriage because her heart was “too open’’ from a recent “spiritual cleanse’’ in India. Peters told Page Six, “There’s a lot more to the story but I think the text … is self explanatory’’ — attaching a copy of what he wrote “dear pammy’’ to tell her they were through.

As for the source who said Anderson considered Peters “controlling,’’ the producer told Page Six, “I welcomed her into my life with open arms and love since I have looked after her for many years. If she meant controlling- I’ve paid … [her] bills since she was broke. I bought her a completely new wardrobe. I didn’t want to say anything just wanted it to be that we were going our own separate ways but when I read your article I felt the need to tell the true story.”

[From Page Six]

Peters also gave Page Six a copy of the breakup text he sent Pam and it was too involved to get into, but suffice to say, he mostly dumped her because of money drama and he thought she was using him. He also wanted to let her know that no matter what, his children and grandchildren would be the ones getting his estate, not her. Which is a lot. Now, do you believe that Jon Peters has been supporting Pam financially for years? Maybe, probably. I think a lot of men in that position – wealthy older men – like to “take care” of exes and such. Sugar daddies. Wish I could find one!

72nd Cannes Film Festival 2019, AmfAR Gala 2019

Photos courtesy of WENN, Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

25 Responses to “Jon Peters says he paid Pamela Anderson’s debts then he dumped her”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Charlotte says:

    Why doesn’t this article discuss more in depth that mere days before their wedding he was engaged to somebody else?! They’re all bonkers!

    • Traveler says:

      WTF happens to the human brain on extreme affluence?! There ought to be some serious studies done.

  2. Valiantly Varnished says:

    Lol. I actually believe this. Werent there rumblings that the reason they split was because she wanted to be added to his will? I feel like this checks out.

    • Layla Beans says:

      Yeah, I think he is telling the truth – in part because who would admit they were engaged to someone else when this went down? Pam’s always had issues with dudes…and money problems. She’s like so many actresses and models of dubious talent that are trying to hitch their wagon to a rich dude when the work dries up and the money runs out. See also: Lohan, Lohan’s mom, Miranda Kerr, Blac Chyna, various women on The Bachelor, lots of reality ‘stars’ etc etc.

      Gold diggers gonna dig.

      • Some chick says:

        She has been abused by men her entire life. Sure she hasn’t made the best choices but she probably has some serious PTS going on. He sounds like a typical dickbag dude that thinks he can just buy a woman with money.

        I think she is broken and that he is a typical rich entitled LA ass.

        She’s been used by men for her entire life. She loves animals so I know she has compassion. That is an easy opportunity for narcissistic or socio types to swoop in and take advantage.

        Don’t ask me how I know.

    • MariaS says:

      So because she likes animals she has compassion and has no agency? Many, many women are abused and don’t turn around and try to manipulate men into paying their debts, align themselves with the likes of Julian Assange, disparage the MeToo Movement, or call Hugh Hefner a civil rights icon.

  3. lucy2 says:

    “it was kind of a dream come true even though I was engaged to someone else and the lady was moving in,’’ Peters wrote.
    Oh Lord.

  4. Christina says:

    Women who live like that pay dearly physically and psychologically. If you want to live that type of lifestyle, better to be a Kardashian with your own money than Pam and Lyndsey and all the others who try to hide that they live off of wealthy men. And wealthy men who want young and/or beautiful women standing beside them make the women pay. Yuck.

    I was propositioned in my 20s and 30s by slime balls. I left LA and it still happened. I don’t drive a Cayenne, but I’d rather have a normal life and my sweet husband and my little RAV4 than be in Page 6 to pay my bills.

  5. Whatever says:

    Kid Rock also made claims that she was broke and demanded that he remodel his home and was all about his money.

    So I believe it.

  6. bekindbekindbekind says:

    “I wish I could find one.”

    No you don’t. You don’t need a controlling Daddy. You’re strong, powerful & great as you are.

    Those sorts of “gifts” are never free.

  7. Meg says:

    Didn’t pam previously marry and divorce a guy twice getting his gambling earnings in the split? Is this her MO? Has she not saved or invested at all?

    • Dali says:

      That is what i was thinking too, didn’t she saved anything or invested? I mean she was huge in the nineties and 2000er years. she could have made a huge fortune by selling her own perfumes or bikinis and on and on!!!
      I guess she was too busy with parties and abusive men. My goodness, what a waste of opportunities.

  8. Case says:

    LOL this story is so bizarre I can’t even.

  9. JRenee says:

    At her age, she needs to get on with being self sufficient and alter her lifestyle to live according to her earnings.
    This sadly sounds like a lot of truth is sprinkled in his statement.

    As for dumping his fiancee to rush a marriage with Pam, my sympathy is for the ex fiancee, but she apparently dodged a hot bullet, yikes!

  10. girl_ninja says:

    How sad. To have your life controlled by the whim of rich men. Just live a simple life! How much money do you need? Just to have a Birkin bag, a few diamonds and a luxury car.

    I’ll keep my Tory Burch Bombe bag, Swarovski chrystals and used Honda any day. It’s not worth it.

  11. Emmitt says:

    I don’t feel sorry for him getting taken for her debt money because he was engaged to someone else and dumped them to marry Pamela.

    I don’t feel sorry for her because she thought she was going to get her Anna Nicole on and he let her know “Nope, ain’t happening.”

    Both of these people are clowns and they both need to sit down and go away.

  12. ME says:

    Seriously what a b*tch she is and food he is ! He dumped his fiance for her lol wow. They both get what they deserve. Is Pam really that broke? Why the f*ck would he add her to his will? Even if they were married I sure as hell would put my kids first…not a fifth wife !

  13. Digital Unicorn says:

    She has previous for bad financial management and getting married to wealthier men to sort it all out for her. A few of her ex’s have said that money is all she really cares about and she can’t handle money.t

    Karma has clapped back at both of them.

  14. Catting says:

    This is just sad all around. I know there are much more troubling things in the world, but geeze.

  15. Starkille says:

    LOL, get it, Pam. Take these disgusting elderly perverts for all they’re worth.

  16. Bichon Lover says:

    They sound perfect for each other. Seriously. Anyone who leaves one fiancee to marry another woman deserves to get taken for $200K. And someone greedy enough to marry to pay off extreme debt and ask to be added to the will deserves to get dumped via text.

  17. Granger says:

    Wow, she must be really bad with money. But she also doesn’t seem to work much anymore — in the last few years, she’s been on a couple of reality shows and had bit parts in small/foreign/low-budget films. So she’s probably not living the life to which she grew accustomed and was hoping this idiot would boost her back up.