There’s another rumor that Princess Eugenie is pregnant

Princess Eugenie married Jack Brooksbank in the autumn of 2018. There have been rumors that Eugenie was pregnant, but she never announced anything. Traditionally, royal newlyweds don’t actually get knocked up right away – most newly married royal couples wait about a year. So
 if Eugenie is pregnant now, it’s right on schedule. The reason I’m suspicious about the current pregnancy rumor is because the basis for it is so random – last Sunday was Mother’s Day in the UK, and Eugenie posted a sweet Mother’s Day message, and that apparently led to a betting frenzy:

Bookies have suspended betting on Princess Eugenie announcing she is expecting her first child with husband Jack Brooksbank, after they received an influx of bets from punters. The flurry of bets on a royal baby York announcement came on Tuesday morning soon after the royal, 30, posted a sentimental tribute to ‘all mothers out there’ on Mother’s Day, sparking rumours she could be expanding her own family.

According to betting intelligence site Mybettingsites.co.uk, royal punters are now convinced baby news is imminent. A spokesperson for Mybettingsites.co.uk said: ‘Royal fans have been quick to question whether Princess Eugenie’s Mother’s Day Instagram message suggested she’s expecting her first baby. The latest betting definitely suggests there could be an announcement around the corner and when it comes, with the lack of sports happening just now, bookies will welcome another royal betting frenzy with open arms.’

Odds on Eugenie and Jack announce they are having a baby in 2020 before the market was suspended were 1/5.

[From The Daily Mail]

I included the Mother’s Day IG above. It’s rather basic and sort of sappy about Fergie, at least that’s how I read it (especially considering that I don’t believe Fergie was or is a good mother). As for everyone thinking that Eugenie is pregnant every three months or so
 I think it’s just the way she dresses, honestly. She has a lovely figure, but she tends to wear clothes which are unflattering on her midsection. That’s my explanation for why she looked like this on Christmas Day:

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Photos courtesy of Getty, WENN, IG.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

22 Responses to “There’s another rumor that Princess Eugenie is pregnant”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Prayer Warrior says:

    Who is she with in that last photograph? I really cannot tell

    • Zapp Brannigan says:

      Fergie, in bedazzled Ugg boots. Which is a sentence I never thought I would type.

      • Mira says:

        This made my day 😀

      • SomeChick says:

        LOL, right?

        Oh, the ’80s fashion in that 3rd pic! I actually enjoyed flipping through these.

        Pregnancy speculation is gross. Betting on pregnancy speculation is next level gross!

  2. MeghanNotMarkle says:

    A royal baby would be some good news during this time but I don’t like the bump watches. If she’s pregnant, great. If she’s not, great. I’m not going to speculate on the state of her uterus.

    • Sofia says:

      I agree. I also hate how everyone turns into gynaecologists when a woman does get pregnant.

      “She shouldn’t do this!”, “well that’s endangering the baby!”, “she’s bending down so she can’t be pregnant!”.

      • MeghanNotMarkle says:

        Yes! Just let them be, for crying out loud. Let their actual physicians worry about them.

  3. Hannah says:

    Both York girls tend to have their Mum’s problem, in that they put on and lose weight all the time – that’s my explanation Kaiser for why things are always so (frustratingly) poorly fitted. i.e. Sarah, at Eugenie’s wedding 😖 that dress was 3 sizes too tight. That definitely had me clutching my Claire’s Accessories pearls 😉

  4. BayTampaBay says:

    I think The Daily Fail has hit major writer’s block as they have run out ideas to make up new things on Meghan and have switched their attention to Eugenie to generate much needed click$.

  5. caty says:

    Considering that you are not now nor ever were privy to their private moments as mother and child throughout their lives and the fact that it is quite clear that both daughters love their mother, your judgement of her as a bad one is actually quite arrogant on your part. Go ahead and crap on her for a lot of her bad decisions but saying she was and is a bad mother is one arrogant step too far.

    • CuriousCole says:

      Dial it down Caty. We have seen Fergie (and Andrew) exploit their daughters for years and not just as human shields against rape and bribery allegations. Years ago Fergie filmed a documentary called Finding Sarah in which she repeatedly ignored the emotional wellbeing of her daughters, saying or doing things that made them upset or cry and then walking away from her tearful girls without any concern. It’s always about her.

    • GuestWho says:

      The Yorks invited not one but two rapists/traffic-ers into their daughters’ orbit (we’re up to two – it wasn’t just Epstein, but Peter Nygard as well).

      They suck as parents.

    • Yup, Me says:

      Damn. What triggered you?

    • notasugarhere says:

      She is a mother who is dependent on her daughters for her own existence and sense of self-worth. She and her rapist husband have used them for PR for years. Yes, they are bad parents.

    • Nic919 says:

      She is a mother who exposed her daughters to a sex trafficker of teen girls. She is a bad mother by any objective definition. If she didn’t have connections to the royals, her children would have been taken from her and Andrew by CAS years ago.

  6. Redgrl says:

    That whole family (the York’s) are the prime example of why the monarchy needs to go. Spoiled, entitled, arrogant grifters. Eugenie seems to be doing a better job of keeping her head down so perhaps she may be learning – one can hope. I have to say her husband looks like every actor cast to play “upper class twit” in movies… can just picture him guffawing and saying things like “right then! Fancy another?”

  7. February Pisces says:

    Slightly off topic, but I just clicked the link to Eugenies Instagram post, and just saw a long hate filled comment saying how great it was she didn’t rush into getting pregnant unlike ‘thug black demon meghan’ And how man made baby Archie is ‘cross eyed’. I clicked on the user and it’s another troll bot bought and paid for by Kensington Palace. No profile pic, no followers, no posts, yep it’s a bot. Gawd they actually used the word ‘black”. These troll bots are clearly told more or less what to post. Can you imaging William or Kate briefing their staff saying, let’s get the bots to call Meghan ‘a black demon’ and Archie ‘cross eyed’. Gawd.

  8. rrabbit says:

    The media make up pregnancy claims all the time. Without any actual evidence, those should simply be ignored.

    “Oh, she’s pregnant”
    (turns out she wasn’t)
    “She had a miscarriage”
    (no, didn’t happen either)
    “Did he cheat on her?”
    (no, he didn’t)
    “They will get a divorce”
    (no, of course not)
    “Are they having a make-up baby?”
    (and back to step number 1)

  9. Charfromdarock says:

    Betting on a pregnancy is just so wrong on many levels.

  10. Lady D says:

    In the first picture of the three of them, there is a lady standing behind Jack who looks exactly like Fergie. Does anyone know who she is?

  11. Karen says:

    Why do you believe that Fergie was not a good mother?