It’s so rude of Prince Harry to invite the Queen to his daughter’s christening!

Royal Ascot, Portrait of HRH Queen Elizabeth the Second behind TRH Harry the Duke of Sussex and TRH Meghan the Duchess of Sussex

British people love their “punishments.” We’ve seen the thick vindictive streak running through British society, the Windsors and their royal press. The Windsors are all petty back-stabbers and utter clowns. They’ve threatened the Duke and Duchess of Sussex with everything under the sun, believing in vain that Harry would eventually come back to them and they could exact a series of punitive measures to ensure that no one ever left the clown cult. Now that Prince Harry is hot, successful, free, happy, rich, woke and f–king over salty white people bullsh-t, the Windsors are struggling to come up with suitable imaginary punishments. We already heard that Queen Elizabeth might disinvite Harry and Meghan from next year’s Platinum Jubilee. But surely there’s something closer on the horizon? Remember, sources insisted that Harry told his family that he wanted little Lilibet Diana christened in the UK this fall. Well now he won’t be able to do that! Or something:

Prince Harry is putting the Queen in a ‘difficult position’ by expecting her to attend his daughter Lilibet’s christening, a royal biographer has claimed. According to royal insiders, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s daughter Lilibet Diana could follow in the footsteps of older brother Archie and be christened in St George’s Chapel in Windsor – with the Queen present.

A source previously told the Daily Mail that Harry said the couple are ‘happy to wait until circumstances allow’ while in the UK to unveil a statue of Princess Diana. But Angela Levin has described Harry’s expectation that his grandmother will attend as unreasonable, given she has missed christenings of other royal children in recent years.

‘That puts her in a very difficult position because she can’t say that she is not free for years,’ she told TalkRadio TV. ‘She didn’t go to Louis’, the third child of Prince William and Kate. So it’s not a spiteful thing.’

The monarch did not attend the christening of Harry and Meghan’s son Archie, two, in 2019, reportedly because she had prior commitments. According to Levin, the Queen sometimes isn’t present at such events because ‘they’re not close enough to the Crown’.

[From The Daily Mail]

Ah, so Levin isn’t saying that Harry and Meghan wouldn’t be allowed to christen Lilibet in the UK, she’s just saying that Harry has put his grandmother in a terrible position where the Queen would obviously refuse to come to the christening? Lord almighty, this is what it’s come to! “How dare you rudely invite your grandmother to her great-grandchild’s christening, don’t you know that she’s running out of excuses for why she hates people of color?” That’s it in a nutshell! And yes, the Queen blanked on Louis’s christening. And Archie’s. I don’t know, she might actually want to go to Lili’s?

Before we learned about Harry’s memoir, other royal commentators were trying to make Lilibet Diana’s christening into a hype-event because of Meghan, obviously. Russell Myers told some British outlet that the christening “will be definitely awkward. Meghan isn’t flavour of the month with the family. Certainly, the family have always said they will be much-loved members of the family. However, we’re still talking about the fallout of the Oprah Winfrey interview, Emmy or no Emmy nomination. The tensions are still running very, very high within the family, indeed.” Lolz, tensions were already so high in the family because their nerves were still shattered by the Oprah interview and the Emmy nomination! And if Meghan isn’t the “flavor of the month,” who is? Sophie?

Royal baby

archie1

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

Related stories

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

91 Responses to “It’s so rude of Prince Harry to invite the Queen to his daughter’s christening!”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Aphra says:

    I love that photo of everyone looking at baby Archie. It’s like a Renaissance painting.

    • Megan Bush says:

      Agreed! I abhor most of the Windsors, but I have kinder thoughts of QE. Not that she is without problems (I mean, hello Andrew, petty children, etc), but her look in that picture reminds me of my own grandmother and how she feels about my kids. My grandma’s about the same age and we aren’t on the best terms, but she adores her great grandkids.

    • Becks1 says:

      honestly, that picture is one that the Windsors should have plastered everywhere after the birth – QE and Prince Philip look exactly how H&M describe them – as warm, loving grandparents and great-grandparents who are genuinely happy to meet their newest great-grandchild. That picture does more to solidify at least some of the Windsors as a “family” then all the christmas walks combined.

    • Christine says:

      I do too, the Queen’s fingers look like they are itching to hold him, like any great-grandmother in the world, and everyone else just looks happy and proud. Hat’s off to this photographer.

  2. ModeratelyWealthy says:

    I am starting to think Lilibet´s skin tone has been deemed “non-acceptable.” After the first wave of ” Lilibet will heal the wounds” is all about ” How dare Lilibet exist!”

    • (TheOG) Jan90067 says:

      Skin tone, or facial features? Are they deemed “not delicate” enough to be accepted/able as TQ’s Great-Granddaughter? So much coded in that one sentence.

  3. lanne says:

    Anyone find it weird how the RF and the ratchets keep putting out stories about the Sussexes being “punished” like they are naughty children who stole a biscuit at tea?

    The only currency the royals have to offer is proximity to themselves. The entire structure and hierarchy of royalty is based on who can come the closest to the monarch. What is ridiculous is that they think they can withhold their presence as some sort of punishment.

    Bitches, Harry and Meghan moved to another continent to be away from you. Making threats about their ability to be within the presence of other royals is laughable. They.really.don’t.get.it.

    • Britt says:

      Exactly. These people don’t realize that Harry and Meghan don’t care. They don’t care about the opinion pieces, rants, polls, threats and they shouldn’t and when it does get too extreme they sue. Why haven’t they realized that it’s not working? Being in California away from the noise has been great for them. The threats are boring and the man literally said he wasn’t afraid on camera. That’s a soldier right there. The emotional blackmail ain’t working either. I don’t understand why these people don’t stop.

      • Eurydice says:

        If they realized this, then they wouldn’t have anything to write about. They just wake up in the morning, forget everything they wrote the day before and start fresh. If they remembered that yesterday they said Harry was going to blow up the monarchy with his memoir, then they wouldn’t be wondering today if he’s planning a RF christening.

  4. Britt says:

    This is just a rumor because they want the Sussexes to respond. They really hate being left out of the dark and their obsession with making money making off this golden couple is over. I don’t know why the media just don’t come out and say they want and need pictures of the christening and baby Lilli to sell papers instead of hiding behind the Queen and or William. It’s not like you’re going to get pictures anyway. If they were shut out of the unveiling, what makes you them think they’ll get photos. It’ll be private and intimate and they’ll be back on a plane to montecito in a heartbeat. It’s the entitlement for me. We want to abuse and bully you relentlessly but we want photos and access. It’s like they know it’s not working but it’s the only strategy that’s gotten others to heel, Harry and Meghan haven’t and it’s traumatizing them.

    • Amy Bee says:

      Exactly.

    • aquarius64 says:

      Plus 100. The Rota have the Windsors on a leash.

      • BothSidesNow says:

        Yes, it’s like that saying beating a dead horse with them. Harry and Meghan don’t care one iota of their nonsense unless it’s a blatant lie, case in point asking the TQ’s permission on the name Lilibet, that causes them to respond. They hate not having access to report on them as easily as it was when they were still with The Firm. The royal rats had an avalanche of leaks, looking at you TOB, Chucky and Keen Guevara, at that time and now they have nothing but speculation and dreamed up narratives to continue their lying and smear campaign, though they are getting help with the smear campaign from the endlessly jealous crew mentioned above.

  5. PEARL GREY says:

    The Queen didn’t attend Archie’s or Louis’ christenings so I’m sure it’s no big deal if she doesn’t attend one for Lili. But that won’t get Angela the clicks she and her fellow rota rats need to continue their careers writing about other people’s personal and private lives for profit.

    • Humbugged says:

      Well Archie’s christening was during Holyrood Week so that was the reason she did not go .And I think the same happened with Louis

      • equality says:

        With Louis she was supposed to be conserving her energy for a busy week but there were health rumors also.

    • Becks1 says:

      I think the Queen attends these christenings if she’s available but doesnt clear her schedule for them, so she was gone for Archie’s, didn’t attend Louis’, she did attend Lena Tindall’s christening if I recall correctly (so it has nothing to do with “proximity to the crown” like that cow Levin said.) I think its just a matter of whether it is convenient for her. I think the only christening she went out of her way to attend was George’s.

      • iconoclast59 says:

        @Becks1, I think you’re exactly right. But you know the RR/BM: Why let facts get in the way of a good lie?

      • BothSidesNow says:

        Yes, as we have seen from these so-called royal reporters as they spin the narrative to suit their dilutions of hate, their continuing campaign of putting Harry and Meghan in their “place” within the family!

    • PrincessK says:

      ‘Rota rats’ …l love that. Nobody should give Levin the time of day, and she doesn’t deserve to be called Harry’s biographer.

  6. Izzy says:

    I never believed the story in the first place about how Harry and Meghan wanted the christening in UK, so I doubt they GAF now either.

    • Susan says:

      Came here to say this. 100 percent. Why on EARTH would a postpartum mom want to take a half day (or more now that I think about it) flight with two babies to have a ceremonial event that is painfully awkward with the family that dissed you???

      • Amy Bee says:

        @Susan: I suspect Archie’s christening was not a totally joyous event with Charles, Camilla, Kate and William being there. I think they would want a happy and stress free event this time without the Windsors being there. It’s why I don’t believe this story.

      • (TheOG) Jan90067 says:

        When I went from LAX to Heathrow, it was about a 13 hr. flight.

        Add in about an hour for them to heli to LAX (or 2 hrs to drive in a limo), add a cranky toddler, a breast-feeding infant, mix with delays and turbulence, add a large dash of Global Pandemic, and add all this to the racist, misogynistic bowl awaiting…. and you have one terrible, horrible, no good, very bad time!

  7. Eurydice says:

    As usual, hypothetical situation and pretend outrage.

  8. MerlinsMom1018 says:

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but…isn’t a christening a private, family affair? So H & M would be inviting his GRANDMOTHER, not “The Queen”???????? Since Harry is no longer (insert whatever phrase for this week) then it seems to me all the ish those folks are wailing about is a moot point but bigoted racists gonna bigoted racist I suppose…

    • Lorelei says:

      And she’s the Head of the Church yet a christening isn’t “close enough to the crown” to merit the presence of the anointed-by-god Queen? 🤔

  9. Pix says:

    I don’t know but I think “the book” is the ultimate power play. The Royal family has zero leverage against Harry and now he holds all the cards. He can write as much or as little as he wants. To me it would seem like Harry gets what Harry wants.

    • Britt says:

      Constantly throwing Harry and Meghan under the bus has actually benefited the couple in a way because now it’s becoming redundant and predictable. Harry and Meghan might as well live their lives as they see fit and they are. The BM and RF are at a standstill.

    • Sunday says:

      Yup, the RRs were already harassing the Sussexes about the Jubilee, Lili’s christening, this second party for a statue in September, etc – now, Harry holds all the cards. IMO the Oprah interview was the first warning shot – H & M were clearly telling the royals “we have receipts, and we will use them if you don’t STFU,” but of course the royals were dense and insisted on an absolute uproar about Lili’s name. They were given the chance to be better and instead they doubled down on their disgusting BS, and that was the last straw for H & M. Now, will the royals finally get it and STFU and play nice? …not likely, lol.

  10. DuchessL says:

    Even if they do the christening in the UK, it’s going to be done in private with the queen as harry’s grandma and not as the queen.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      DuchessL, that’s what I think, too. No one will find out about it until after the fact. I can see Harry wanting Lilibet to be christened in the UK just as Archie was, because that is part of their birthright from his side of the family. I don’t think there is any time line for them to do this, so it might happen next year.

      • paddingtonjr says:

        It might make sense to have Lili’s christening during the Jubilee or maybe at the same time as Eugenie’s baby, if they want a church baptism in the UK. Of course, they would invite Harry’s grandmother (aka TQ), but as we have seen with other baptisms, if she’s busy or just doesn’t want to go, she won’t. I’m sure H&M would be okay either way.

  11. Chill says:

    The Windsors are a mess.

  12. Chaine says:

    Maybe the queen doesn’t want to go because all of these religious ceremonies are tedious and boring?

    • equality says:

      She is supposed to be the leader of a church so that would not be a good excuse.

      • Chaine says:

        Correct, she can’t come out and say THAT, but she can make up lame excuses like “I’m busy preparing for my work week” of zoom calls and ribbon cuttings to cover for it.

      • Lady D says:

        While I doubt Liz would say it aloud, I’m sure she thinks it sometimes. How many ceremonies has she attended that were lengthened because someone wanted to impress her Majesty? I imagine ceremonial embellishments are part and parcel of every event, including church, she’s part of.

    • teecee says:

      The entire justification for her position and power is that she was allegedly chosen by God. If she doesn’t believe, she’s running perhaps the greatest con the world has ever known.

      • PrincessK says:

        I think that the divine right of Kings ended with Charles I when he had his head chopped off.

  13. equality says:

    After missing Louis’ christening the Queen attended Lena Tindall’s. She also attended Mia’s. So clearly the theory about proximity to the throne and attendance is debunked, as well as, she can’t attend the rest because she missed Louis’. Does anybody really believe this drivel? Their target audience has to be the logic-impaired. Is it supposed to make them look good that Meghan isn’t “the flavour of the month”? Even IF the Queen had a valid reason to dislike Meghan how does that excuse her from acknowledging her grandchild Harry or greatgrandchildren Archie and Lili? Isn’t she supposed to be so “diplomatic” and “classy” and the leader of a church that preaches Christian principles? Other “lesser people” attend things everyday with people they dislike (try working, Queenie where you can’t pick co-workers.).

    • Humbugged says:

      Try not having christenings when she is on Royal duty then .She was in Scotland for both Archie/Louis as it was Holyrood Week .It was easier for Meghan’s friends to get in that weekend but this shit is planned years in advance

      • equality says:

        Meghan’s friends? How would you know that? Tabloids? And that wasn’t the reason given for Louis’, it was said she was “conserving her energy for a busy week”.

      • Maria says:

        Sorry but in Archie’s case her duties for Holyrood Week were finished by then, and she had the weekend off. This was described by the papers too.
        Shooting at Sandringham was more important than Archie’s christening (Harry’s first child, unlike Louis with William).
        Louis’s christening was not during Holyrood Week and it was reported that because it was their third kid everyone was more relaxed about it.
        She’ll go to them when she feels like it. She clearly didn’t feel like it for Archie, so there was no reason for Meghan not to pattern it around her friends.

      • equality says:

        Poor Louis. Makes me feel sad for him too. If you are the third child, you aren’t important?

      • Maria says:

        They really have been sidelining Louis a lot, it IS sad.

      • Amy Too says:

        Equality, it was the 4th of July weekend where Americans usually get a 3 day weekend, so I’m assuming that’s why they said it was easier for Meghan’s friends (and family) (in America) to come to the christening.

      • Humbugged says:

        No having a break after touring round Scotland for 7 days and travelling back on the Friday

      • Maria says:

        The final day of Holyrood Week 2019 was July 3. Archie’s christening was on the 6th.
        She just didn’t want to go.

      • Humbugged says:

        She does not have a ‘flight’ . So you are suggesting than a 90+ woman should have spent a day travelling the 10 hours on a train and went to the thing at St Georges – or H & M could have held it back to the next week

      • Maria says:

        Humbugged, your constant incorrect assertions and defense of this family never cease to make me smile.
        I don’t know what world you live in but the Royals do use air travel/helicopters and even a train ride from Scotland to London takes about a day if that.
        If she’s too frail to make the trip in 3 days she’s too frail to be doing Holyrood Week, so you can sit down about her age.
        It wasn’t a priority for her. Accept it.

  14. Jo73c says:

    Meh – it’s a non-story. The Queen hasn’t attended the last few christenings, and probably wouldn’t attend this one whatever the circumstances, but it would be poor form not to invite her.

  15. Lizzie says:

    Harry isn’t going to plan his baby’s christening just to give the entire family an opportunity to snub him, so yes he will schedule around the queens availability. Charles and TOB will flee the country.

  16. Ainsley7 says:

    The reason that the Queen doesn’t come to some events is because she’s super busy. She’s not running around snubbing family members for not being “close enough to the crown.” The specific problem with the Queen being able to make it to christenings is the god parents. They would need to find a day when all their chosen god parents and the Queen can come. People usually have only 2 god parents, but the Royals like a whole bunch. So, it’s harder to get everyone on the same schedule. The Queen will be there if she can. With COVID, Lili might not be christened this year. So, they’ll have awhile to find a date that works for everyone.

  17. Amy Bee says:

    Yeah, the christening is not going to be in the UK. So the media and royalists can forget this story. Even if it was going to happen in Windsor, it’s going to be a private event with no photos.

    • Thirtynine says:

      I think you’re right, Amy Bee. I think it will happen quietly somewhere in the US. And it will be beautiful and special and private. I sort of think that asmuch as Harry is a Prince with traditions etc. I think he’s also conscious of making new traditions for a new family in a new way. I would be surprised if there was an urgent push to go back to Windsor for a christening.

  18. Nina says:

    In the christening picture, who is the woman standing next to Carole?

  19. Harper says:

    Prince TOB and Mumbles are the real problem with a potential Windsor/UK christening for Princess Lili. Would they attend? Or would they be suddenly out of the country on a diplomatic visit to Dublin or Edinburgh? The media circus over that would be over the big top.

    I think that Harry and Meghan would be able to peace out and handle the Cambridges’ presence if their goal was for Princess Lili to have the same christening that her brother had. But the Keens are only in it for publicity and they would use the ceremony for their own embiggening.

    • JT says:

      I wouldn’t even invite the Keens if I were the Sussexes. For starters, they would absolutely use the event to embiggen themselves and it would be the most press that Wiglet and Will Jung Un could get, so bonus for them. Secondly, I don’t see the point in spending time with people who treat you like shit. Inviting them would only bring grief to H&M anyway. They should have the christening with the queen and everyone else except Charles, Will, and Kate. Spend your time with people who bring joy to your life. (Obviously H&M will do what works for them, but sometimes it’s ok to say fuck it)

  20. KL says:

    Someone help me out here… Remember when Meghan and Harry first “escaped” to Canada? At the time, wasn’t it sort of implied that they had to get out in a hurry so their baby wasn’t, for lack of a better word, kidnapped by the Queen?

    Doing some basic Googling, my understanding is that the reigning sovereign has legal custody of all minor grandchildren. Is this still the case with Meghan and Harry’s kids?

    If so, and if I’m Meghan, there’s ZERO CHANCE those kids go back to the UK while they are still minors. I don’t care how unlikely it is that the RF would act on this power. I don’t trust them for a single second.

    So, like, just saying… I don’t even believe a Christening is going to happen in the UK.

    Also, an invitation is very different from “expecting attendance.” I hate these tabloid stories so much.

    • Sofia says:

      the queen does. not. have. custody of Archie. @KL it’s not your fault directly because you’re not the only one who believes but I’m just speaking to everyone who does.

      First of all that rule was designed like 300 years ago when custody laws were non existent. And it was designed because George I wanted to choose who his grandson’s godparent would be because he had a terrible relationship with his son. If the queen tries to take custody using this, it’ll be laughed out of any international court. Possibly also the British ones (yes I know she’s the monarch).

      And even if this was still valid rule, it applies to grandchildren only. Not great-grandchildren like Archie is. But it’s not and it will not be held up if she tries to take custody.

      • Katherine says:

        This Sofia. And not possibly laughed out of the British court, definitely laughed out of the British court. This is such a bizarre piece of trivia that just is not valid. People love to fetishize weird royal rules and the vast majority of them don’t actually exist. They could vote if they wanted, they travel on the same plane all the time, they are glorified aristocrats and one of them has a constitutional role at any given time (and barely a role at that.) but they are first and last regular human beings subject to almost entirely the same laws as any other British citizen. (Sure the Queen doesn’t have a license and passport or whatever but the rest of them do.) in 2021 literally no one has custody of any minor royal child other than their parents. Regardless of who they are or where they rank in line. Period full stop. Same as any Joe Schmo walking down the street in London with their kid. Even Diana’s divorce people like to throw out as her giving up custody, she most certainly did not. They had joint like most divorces. She certainly agreed to a lot of stuff re: education and vacations and whatnot I’m sure in light of the boys (really William’s) roles but she did not lose custody. I’m sorry this rumor just bothers me so much it’s so ridiculous on it’s face and I think contributes to this bizarre royal family mystique that’s actually just smoke and mirrors.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      “the reigning sovereign has legal custody of all minor grandchildren”

      The reigning sovereign does NOT have legal custody of any of grandchildren or great-grandchildren.

      This is just misinformation generated on social media to generate click$ and posts.

  21. Sofia says:

    She has missed Louis and Archie’s so if she misses this one (if it’s held in the UK), I don’t think it’ll be a big deal. BP will just put out a “she was busy” statement and the rota will remind people that she didn’t attend some other’s christening and that would be it.

  22. Lizzie Bathory says:

    I suspect they’ll do the christening quietly in California & we’ll only hear about it after the fact, maybe with a nice black & white photo. They have 2 small kids, plus coronavirus in the UK, plus the press nightmare.

    Can’t wait to hear from “sources” that the service was “woke,” Meghan wore something that wasn’t free, avocado toast was served at the reception & the baptismal font was filled with Piers Morgan’s tears.

    • iconoclast59 says:

      There’s a lovely church in Montecito, All Saints by the Sea Episcopal Church. I would love to watch the BM’s heads explode if H&M baptize Lili there!

  23. Scorpion says:

    Poor Archie, I hope that H&M clipped Baldy and Keen from his family christening photo. Everyone looks happy except for them

    • Maria says:

      William looks like he’s trying to fight back a bad case of Montezuma’s Revenge.

      And Kate’s passive aggressive choice of earrings…

  24. Catherine says:

    That christening was manufactured the Mail and is being carried by the other tabloids because they were shut out of any info about Lili’s birth and it doesn’t look like their going to get any pictures. The media is desperately to make it seem like they know something and are hoping that the Queen attendance will ensure photos will be published. But if/when the Sussexes christen Lili in the UK; they are no longer under any obligation to announce it ahead of time or release photos. I think they’ll follow in Zara’s footsteps in that regard. The Queen attended her daughters christening but nobody knew about it until after the fact. The media can’t claim any right to access like they did with Archie so they are throwing in the Queen’s presence as a justification for talking about it. The Church of England has no “deadline” for a christening. Given the COVID variant concerns in the UK. I highly doubt the Sussexes are even contemplating a trip to the the UK. I think when things were looking more positive they were probably planning a return sometime during Sept/Oct/Nov but now I think any parent would hesitate and it was just announced that the US put the UK on the level 4 list which means they recommend against US citizens traveling to the UK and if you are not US citizen and you choose to travel to the UK they could bar your entry back into the UK. NO WAY. They risk going over there and not being able to get back into the US.

  25. Lorelei says:

    I enjoyed how (in this article, at least) the first person to jump in with their negativity and criticism is a “royal biographer,” lol

  26. Over it says:

    Financially independent means that Harry and Meghan don’t owe anyone shit. No photos, no responses to the media or the family.no needing permission to do one shit. That is what your own money buys you bitches.

  27. Over it says:

    If the grandchildren were corgis or horses, maybe she would care enough to attend. I don’t believe she was ever too busy. She just doesn’t care about babies or humans in general.

  28. Emile says:

    “British people love their “punishments.” We’ve seen the thick vindictive streak running through British society, the Windsors and their royal press.”

    A few weeks ago I was on Twitter and someone (a British person) said that the abuse of H&M (as well as others) by the British press and monarchy accomplishes the same thing public floggings and beheadings might have done in other eras — by punishing undesirables and giving the public a chance to revel in the spectacle of someone being taken down a notch and/or put in their place. It is the only explanation that makes sense to me because I can see no other reason why the British public would put up with a media and monarchy that is so vicious and institutionally corrupt. I would love it if a group of academics (media studies scholars, psychologists, anthropologists, sociologists, and historians) could come together and do a documentary series unpacking this phenomenon.

    (I should add that, of course, public floggings and beheadings did and still do take place in other parts of the world. But nowhere other than the UK have I seen the logic and sentiments underpinning those practices seep so effortlessly into the public sphere and at such a large scale).

    • BnlurNforever says:

      There definitely seems to be a need to see others (especially those who are othered) taken down a notch. It might be a human instinct but the Brits seems less able to hide this particular cruelty than any other society in western civilization that I’ve noticed.

    • Marivic says:

      @ Emile. You’re right. This is true.

      The British are a vindictive, merciless, and ruthless lot. They are hateful and racist.

    • PrincessK says:

      Very well said.

    • Pat says:

      This situation with the salty people including the queen and company, royalist as well act like they are brainwashed. It’s like a cult. Liz conn game is tight. Trump wants a situation like the queen and her family have in regards to everything the people provide through funding. So yeah. I have said it before, the royals don’t have normal common sense, but they have their royal playbook and it gives them All the advantage. The queen and her family have been running game on the people for hundred’s of years. They have to tweak and perfect their conn for a new generation of millennial’s that are doing some things differently and have no problem asking why and for what reason when necessary. The world is changing like it or not.

  29. PoppedBubble says:

    Angele Levin said, “That puts her in a very difficult position because she can’t say that she is not free for years.” LOL What is this B.S.? That doesn’t even make any sense. So they schedule it for September and the Queen says, nope she can’t make it. Then it is canceled because of the Delta variant and schedule for November in hopes that it will be safe. Queen is too busy again. So it is rescheduled again during the Christmas holiday when they’re all together. The Queen STILL can’t make it for…reasons. So then they ask the Queen when she would be available, and she says, “Unfortunately, any day you want to hold it, I’ll be busy.” In other words, I can’t deny you my presence if you won’t tell me when it is. Please, Angela.

  30. L4frimaire says:

    Why are they still talking about this, as if it’s even going to happen with anyone’s knowledge but the parents? Eugenie just had to cancel her sons christening because of Covid. The State Department has advised against non- essential travel to the UK due to the Delta variant. Whatever they decide to do will be private and certainly won’t involve the Rota, who had an absolute meltdown over Archie’s christening. When it was announced that Archie’s christening would be private, that was when Piers Morgan told Meghan to go back to America if she wanted privacy. That was when the whole “ privacy” thing started. It was never anything the Sussexes said directly.

  31. ChattyCath says:

    Since Lili is only ‘a quarter black’ it would be more appropriate to have a Lord Lieutenant or other representative not the Queen. It’s all graded on skin colour and position. That’s how stupid Angela Levin sounds. Hateful old bag!

  32. Songs (Or it didnt happen) says:

    What if the baby is not christened at all? Not every parent does that. Harry has no role to fulfill to the Church of England. Just saying, for all this speculation, Lili might either already have been christened, or H&M have no plans to do so.

  33. Theothermia says:

    Lmfao Sophie as flavour of the month : somehow bland AND bitter 😂

  34. Marivic says:

    In that family photo, look how Harry and Meghan sat as far away from William and Kate. You see that gaping hole. Self-explanatory.

  35. Pat says:

    I think that if there’s any truth to Harry mentioning Lilly being Christiand at BP it’s bcuz that is the traditional way for Harry and his family to do this. However, I think Meghan is fine with it, going along as his wife. I understand that, they love each other. But honestly that family including the queen has allowed them to be put through hell and I believe Harry’s grandmother is saying one thing to him and come licit with Charles and William. I have a hard time seeing granny as innocent here, I see throw the rock and hide the hand