OK!: Jennifer Garner and John Miller are already married, they didn’t get a prenup

OK! Magazine has Jennifer Garner’s alleged wedding on their cover this week. I put OK! right there in the title because I don’t think this is true. I’ll explain why in a moment. Last week we saw a video on Instagram of Jennifer Garner talking to Judy Greer. Garner was wearing what looked like an heirloom engagement ring on her left ring finger. I also found a paparazzi photo of her wearing that same ring on her left hand, but on the middle finger. It turns out that she was seen before that with the ring on her left ring finger, which seems to be the impetus for this probably made up story in OK! They claim that Garner and Miller are already married and that they had a small ceremony in the backyard of her house “a few weeks ago.” Plus, as I also put in the title, these two allegedly didn’t get a prenuptial agreement before this supposed wedding. Here’s more, from OK!

Now, shortly after she was photographed wearing what appeared to be an engagement ring in late October, an insider exclusively tells OK! the 49-year-old actress and 43-year-old burger chain tycoon have quietly tied the knot in an intimate wedding in Los Angeles. “Word is they went ahead and got married in a small ceremony at Jen’s home a few weeks ago,” spills the insider. “They both wanted it to be low-key but meaningful, and it turned out to be the most magical day ever.”

The pair — who were first linked in October 2018 and reconciled in May following a brief split — said “I do” in front of just 15 guests, including Jen’s kids Violet, 15, Seraphina, 12, and Samuel, 9 (whom she shares with ex-husband Ben Affeck), plus a group of their closest friends and family members. “The backyard was set up beautifully,” the insider gushes, adding that Jen and John exchanged handwritten vows at a custom-built altar. “There were sweet little touches like a pianist playing in the background and floral arrangements scattered around the garden in a variety of colors,” the insider says. “It was a simple yet classy affair and everything Jen and John wanted.”

But the down-to-earth mom of three is ready to risk it all again with the regular Joe. “As far as Jen is concerned, John is Mr. Wonderful,” dishes the insider. “It’s obvious they both feel they’ve hit the jackpot.”

So much so, Jen is said to be even forgoing a prenuptial agreement. “Jen trusts John with her life and vice versa,” says the insider. (The CaliBurger CEO is worth an estimated $20 million while Jen is worth approximately $80 million.) “John is incredibly successful and wealthy in his own right, so there’s nothing for Jen to worry about in that area. Plus, she’s confident that they’ll be spending the rest of their lives together, so there’s no need for a prenup.”

[From OK! Magazine, print edition, November 15, 2021]

The paparazzi are camped outside Garner’s house. If a bunch of cars pulled up for a wedding I’m we would be hearing more about this. Plus OK! pushes it too far in this story by claiming that they’re going to try to have a baby. However she could definitely be engaged. Garner hasn’t commented at all, even through sources, after all the speculation last week that she was engaged. She knows what she’s doing by wearing a ring on that finger. People Magazine didn’t run a story about this either. They covered the content of her video with Greer without mentioning the obvious ring on her left hand. I’m happy for her and hope that she does get a prenup. Also, a backyard wedding sounds romantic and just her style. I hope she does do it small and her way. Her last wedding, to Ben Affleck, was on the beach and I think she prefers small weddings.

The natural follow up question is when are Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez going to get engaged? I’m hoping this Christmas! Fingers crossed.



Photos credit: Instar

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

49 Responses to “OK!: Jennifer Garner and John Miller are already married, they didn’t get a prenup”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Rapunzel says:

    Eh, the “no pre-nup” factoid seals it for me as fake. I don’t see a rich mom with 3 kids not protecting her assets for her kids with a pre-nup. I don’t think they’re getting married without one.

    • L84Tea says:

      I agree. She’s been married twice already. She’s not stupid.

    • myjobistoprincess says:

      I think there’s no prenup because this was a jenniferAniston type of wedding. There’s no legal paper to this. they’re doing this for themselves.

      • minx says:

        I don’t even think it was that. Reminds me of those tabloid stories about Jennifer Aniston being pregnant.

      • whatWHAT? says:

        this is what I think, too. it’s a commitment ceremony for them, no legality…no paperwork…

        IF it happened, that is.

      • Kebbie says:

        That was my exact thought as well. The only way there is no pre-nup is if it wasn’t a legal wedding. I doubt it even took place, but if it did, she’s not an idiot, she wouldn’t get married a third time without financial protections for her and her kids in place.

    • Tanya says:

      You don’t necessarily need a pre-nup if you’ve got everything locked up in trusts though. Plus he’s got tons of money too. I’d be shocked her assets weren’t thoroughly protected, given Ben’s past issues.

    • NotSoSocialButterfly says:


    • Joey says:


  2. OSTONE says:

    Amazing Amy would never get married without a prenup.

  3. Amy Bee says:

    One other clue that it’s not true, they say Harry’s guilt ridden and rushing back to the UK. LOL. If she was really married, People Mag would be talking about it.

    • Lena says:

      She called out people magazine a few years ago for using sources not from her so I doubt if they would run anything except quoted directly from her. You wonder why these magazine print stuff like this if it’s totally made up.

  4. lucy2 says:

    No chance she would do it without a prenup. Also, good grief, you’d think at 50 female celebrities would be clear of the baby rumors, but I guess it’s never ending.

  5. ME says:

    Jennifer is smart. No way is she getting married without a pre-nup. I don’t believe this story one bit.

  6. Becks1 says:

    I feel like if they did get married People would have the exclusive story, along with some pics, even if it was a few weeks after the fact, so I don’t really believe this. I mean anything is possible and I’m not swearing it didn’t happen lol, but I just don’t really buy it.

    Those socks with the shoes….why Jen, why?

    • BothSidesNow says:

      I know @ Becks1, she should have been sans socks. But I don’t believe one bit of this story. Ben really did a number on her and she is still probably fearful for his sobriety for the rest of his life, due to the kids. She is certainly a strong and courageous woman! She handled the entire Ben situation gracefully and came out stronger but Ben seems to still be struggling. And I know she wouldn’t do everything in her power to protect her children, no pre-nup my arse!!

      And yes, poor George does look wonky. What did they do to him?

    • Yup, Me says:

      Her hair looks so shiny and healthy. It’s amazing.

      Otherwise, Jennifer Garner’s fugly mom style consistently gives me the sads.

  7. Al says:

    If she’s just thinking about introducing him to her kids now, no way they’re married.

    A paparazzo congratulated her on her engagement a few days ago, and she scoffed “oh please”

  8. Jayna says:

    No prenup? LOL She’s worth a fortune. She will have an ironclad prenup. And why wouldn’t they? They are both in their mid to late 40s and have their own children and their own business interests.

  9. Becks1 says:

    Also what did they do to George Clooney’s face on the cover?? I don’t think I would have known that was him if it didnt say so.

  10. candy says:

    I must say, she is looking really good these days.

  11. Tiffany says:

    Naw. Jennifer’s go to publications are Us Weekly and People.

    Not true.

  12. Miss Melissa says:

    Interesting how she goes out with frumpy “I’m just a real mom” clothes and a full face of hair and makeup.

    Celebrity is gross.

    That’s all I’ve got.

    • Kebbie says:

      She looks like she was at a photo shoot but changed back into her clothes before she left lol

      • FF says:

        It doesn’t even look like her clothes, more like she ran from her photoshoot through random neighbourhood backyards randomly pulling laundry off of clotheslines and that outfit was the outcome.

        These choices must fill a niche for her because she does it all time. Maybe the idea is that she’s trying to look anti-photographic so paps won’t snap her?

      • AlpineWitch says:

        Hahaha your first paragraph had me in stitches, FF!! 🤣🤣🤣

  13. so_annoyed says:

    I am giving major side-eye to OK! for more than this story. Also, whoever did that horrendous photoshop needs to be replaced ASAP.

    I photographed a celebrity wedding (you all know them on here), and it was supposed to be hush-hush, with no images ever seeing the light of day. Well, the lovely paparazzi showed up, took photos, and then went to People. People approached the couple, saying they were running the story either way and gave them the option of using our images vs. the other ones.

    With my one experience in being a part of something like this, my take is:
    1. The photos would already be out there if anyone had them. Especially if this happened weeks ago.
    2. Jen is no dummy, so they lost me a no prenup.

    My two cents 🙂

  14. AmelieOriginal says:

    Omg that outfit lol, I’ve had a soft spot for Jennifer since her Alias days because I loved that show, but I always knew her day to day fashion was pretty frumpy and housewifey (even before she became a mom). That outfit though she looks like she’s part of an ensemble cast for a conservative cult miniseries!

    Also I had to do a double take with OK’s cover, I really thought it was Michael Vartan. It’s been said several times but John Miller looks SO much like him. And I doubt this actually happened. Also John has kids from his first marriage too I thought, they are definitely not going to try for a baby. And I think Jennifer would get a prenup this time around.

    • pyritedigger says:

      She has the absolute worst style. WTF is that outfit.

    • MsIam says:

      Speaking of kids its funny the article doesn’t mention his kids being there, only hers. Just an anonymous group of close “friends and family”. No specifics at all so this really sounds fake. I can believe they had a party but wedding? Not a chance.

  15. Big Little Sighs says:

    Why couldn’t she wear some cute ballet flats or a really cut pair of suede booties with that sweater and skirt. But no she puts on freaking sneakers with white sweat socks. ::insert elmo gif with fire burning::

    • Kebbie says:

      She could have made white sneakers with no-show socks somewhat work. Sneakers with a skirt or dress can look super cute (though I’m not sure anything would work with this particular sweater/skirt combo.)

      I really think she must put effort into finding the ugliest shoes and clothes possible. It’s not even hit or miss, it’s 100% miss all the time.

      ETA: I zoomed in and they’re Chanel. So she dropped real money to pair them with this outfit. I’m actually laughing out loud right now.

      • Big Little Sighs says:

        You’re right! So she paid a lot of money for Chanel sneakers and found a way to make them look bad. Like when she looked in the mirror at this outfit- she said yes! This is the exact look I was going for! I am so mad right now.

    • huckle says:

      Maybe she will put her cute shoes on at the next stop. I mean she is walking with her son on the asphalt. I knew a rich lady that wouldn’t walk down the street to lunch in her pumps because she said she paid too much for them. She would always drive instead.

  16. MsIam says:

    Anything to sell magazines I guess. But OK is the bottom of the barrel when it comes to celebrity “news”. Right there with Life & Style.

  17. HeatherC says:

    The same magazine that says a guilt ridden Harry is rushing back to England? Nope, this didn’t happen.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      Yep, a magazine owned by Dylan Howard’s Empire Media Group. One of the names in Toxic Tom’s pulled morning show interview. Nope, nope. Not a reliable source.

  18. milliemollie says:

    OK Magazin had Pitt and Aniston getting married several times as a cover story. And I think she was also pregnant with his twins according to OK. No one talks to them. They make everything up.

  19. Joanna says:

    She has a banging body and face but she wears the ugliest clothing!

  20. Lola says:

    I was going to post about her outfit, but then looked at my own covid/post covid attire and sighed in dismay. However I’m not in the public eye! But nor do I have multi millions!!!

  21. Normades says:

    Cracks me up how any guy who isn’t famous is called ‘a regular Joe’. Dude is worth 20 mil.

  22. Bread and Circuses says:

    She looks really pretty in the outdoor photos. Her skin and hair look amazing.

  23. Caseysmom says:

    So a person worth $20 million who has his own burger chain is a “regular guy”? Then what am I??!

  24. Natalie says:

    Not having a prenup isn’t the reason I think this story is bogus; Ok Magazine reporting this story is the reason.
    No prenup could be for a few reasons but the dude is worth some serious coin, he’s got millions, is the CEO of Call Group, has been a VP of a pharmaceutical company and has a lea degree-at some point I’m assuming he was practicing law perhaps. So it would benefit J Garner to not sign a prenup.
    Other reasons:
    -her assets are tied up in trusts
    -marriage ceremony doesn’t always mean the marriage is legally binding….ahem Jen Anniston. If that is the case, it would actually protect her assets more securely than a prenup, as a prenup could have a loophole that the right attorney could get around hypothetically. In California, there is no ‘common law’ marriage so either party wouldn’t be entitled to half.

    On another note: I know Jen Garner has always been a terrible dresser but that skirt outfit with the tennis shoes and long socks is just on an entire different level of awful. Her makeup and hair are done up for once-which is a nice change from her usual day to day frumpy pap strolls.

  25. Great says:

    What is the point of pre nap if divorces taking 5 years and court battle with pre naps etc….lol
    Congrats to her wish her a happy ending in relationship. She handled a difficult situation in a respectable way. Even though this is how she fight.

  26. Great says:

    What is the point of pre nap if divorces taking 5 years and court battle to etc….lol
    If true Congrats wish her a happy ending in relationship. She handled a difficult situation in a respectable way. Even though this is how she fight.