Sarah Jessica Parker & Kim Cattrall: the aging diva battle continues

fp_3572521_cattrall_parker_nyc_090809

Ever since Sex and the City became a cultural phenomenon (back around season 2, or roughly nine years ago), it’s been an open secret that Kim Cattrall and Sarah Jessica Parker don’t really care for each other. Despite some people wanting it to be some kind of petty catfight, I tend to think they simply aren’t all that friendly, but are able to maintain a professional, working relationship. The relationship has had its challenges of course – when SJP became a producer on the show, some said Kim resented the control SJP had. Some also claimed that Kim held out for the biggest paychecks for the SATC films. None of that may be true, or parts of it, or all of it. Still, the rumors persist, and Kim and SJP have had to address them.

Recently, in her Elle Magazine cover story, SJP defended her relationship with Kim once again, saying, “I don’t think anybody wants to believe that I love Kim. I adore her. I wouldn’t have done the movie without her. Didn’t and wouldn’t.” But sources are now telling In Touch Weekly that there’s still some snottiness going around – this time about how the two actresses are aging:

Although reports of feuding between Kim Cattrall, 53, and Sarah Jessica Parker, 44, were often denied, there was no mistaking in the first SATC movie that Kim’s character, Samantha, was imposed with a real attack on aging: Samantha celebrated her 50th birthday – she grew fat and even split with her hunky younger love interest.

The movie’s sequel looks no different: In one scene, an embarrassed Samantha shows up wearing the same outfit as teen queen Miley Cyrus.

Setsiders say the candid photos from the set prove there is a real age war erupting: SJP looks much older than her younger character, Carrie, and older than Samantha, so this attempt of not letting Samantha shine is proving the rumors have life.

Ironically, Kim has no desire to look like the younger Sarah Jessica. Samantha’s been known for her body, not her face, and she’s not afraid to show it!

[From In Touch Weekly, print edition, November 23, 2009]

Part of the reason I’ve always loved Kim (but not always her character Samantha) is because Kim seems like the most gifted physical comedienne of the group. The scripts for the television show and the films always have Kim doing a lot of physical comedy work (much more than the other actresses), and she always nails it brilliantly. If the physical comedy weren’t also so sexual, I think Kim would get a lot more credit as comedic actress. My point: I don’t think Kim minds the physical comedy aspect of the Samantha role, nor would she mind playing off the running gags that Samantha is, in fact, much older than the other girls. It’s how the character has always been written, and it’s one of Kim’s many strengthes as an actress. As for the whole “SJP looks older” thing – well… I hate to say it, but Kim just seems to be aging with more grace than SJP. Maybe it’s good genes, maybe she takes care of herself, whatever.

Sarah Jessica Parker and Kim Cattrall playing nice on the set of ‘Sex and the City 2’ in New York on September 8, 2009. Credit: Fame.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

30 Responses to “Sarah Jessica Parker & Kim Cattrall: the aging diva battle continues”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Maritza says:

    Kim has always been much more prettier than Sarah. That’s a fact.

  2. Dorothy says:

    SJP is too skinny her neck looks gross.

  3. Sumodo says:

    SJP lost here mojo, I mean MOLE, and it was all downhill from there. Kim Cattrall looks fantastic.

  4. Lynnie says:

    They’re both ridiculous. Cattrall can’t be taken seriously and SJP is certainly no fashion icon. She has a great little shape but, my gosh, the hideous clothes…

  5. Firestarter says:

    As much as I have enjoyed Sex and The City, I have to say that it is time to let it go. Let it retire with some dignity. I pray this is the last movie!

  6. PJ says:

    I agree Kim is aging better. I think it’s because SJP is so thin; she has basically zero fat on her body, and it makes her face look pinched because there’s no fat on it. Kim on the other hand has some body fat–not a lot, but enough to give her a softer look.

  7. tommysgirl54 says:

    I agree with PJ but I also have to say that I think Kim is by far the worst actress on that show. She is the only one who ever seems like she is acting. It’s always sooooo over the top. While I understand that it is comedy, the other 3 women are so grounded in their performances that Kim just looks silly. Also, if she ever has a dramatic scene, I just cringe. She just opens her eyes really wide and apparantly that means that something is serious. I never got here appeal (other than the obvious sexual)

  8. Popcorny says:

    There is no hope, Sarah no longer looks like Woody Allen’s daughter, she’s looks like his sister.
    I give it 2 years before she’s able to play his mother.

  9. waldemar says:

    That’s no riddle.

    SJP smokes. Kim doesn’t.

  10. LolaBella says:

    @Firestarter… I love SATC, but ‘dignity’ went out the window when they had Charlotte crap her pants when they went to Mexico in the first movie. I was embarrassed for them by that point. The ONLY redeeming part of that movie was a naked and gloriously wet Gilles Marini! *Swoon*

    Depending on the reception of this second movie, SJP might just turn this into a franchise and we might be seeing SATC: The Early Bird Special in a few years! LOL.

  11. Kevin says:

    SJP will always have scoreboard on Kim,,,JFK JR.

  12. Firestarter says:

    @LolaBella- LOL! I know, that was such a stupid part to have in the movie! It was so unrealistic, as “tourista” does not hit you that fast!

    My favorite part of the movie? Kim’s Giusseppe Zanotti fish bone shoes she wore in the sushi scene. God, I love those shoes!

  13. El Predicto says:

    Face it…they have become the Golden Girls. Only not as funny!

  14. crash2GO2 says:

    I’m really not a fan of sex and the city, but I do like SJP. I think the observation that she is a smoker is a good one. Also, she is extremely thin, and does not seem to have had much done to her face, contributing to an older look. Her face is also a less classic ‘pretty’ shape than Cattrall’s. But they are BOTH lovely women, and I hope this is all just blah-de-blah.

  15. snowball says:

    Ugh, I can’t get past SJP’s FEET!

    Wasn’t Kim “Lassie” in the first Porkey’s movie?

  16. sickofit says:

    SJP ist extremely thin but has always been.
    KC is really goodlooking for her age, but SJP does not look old for her age neither. I mean if i will look that good at 44 without smoking, jeez, id be thankful.

  17. Tia C says:

    Everybody’s comments here are great so far, LOL. I totally agree about letting it go with dignity…but yes, sadly, we are past that point. The first movie sucked and they should have just let it go after that.

    Does SJP smoke? I didn’t know that. Carrie did, in the show, but I thought she was just acting. If she does smoke in real life, that does partially explain her rapid aging. But like Maritza said up top, Kim Cattrall is and always has been FAR more attractive than SJP. And can one have cosmetic surgery on one’s feet? If so, SJP needs to make an appointment STAT – her feet are positively frightening. They definitely keep me in flats!!

  18. Eileen Yover says:

    I guess in Hollywood terms, SJP isn’t aging like the others, but she still looks great for her age. I think they all do and its nice to see some women who aren’t going overboard with the plastic. I’m sure there’s some nips and tucks here and there, but they aren’t over doing it.
    Sometimes I love what Carrie Bradshaw wears in the shows and movie and sometimes she looks like a hobo or a hooker. Its very hit or miss to me. But she always has fabulous shoes!!

  19. Mrs. Darcy says:

    Agree with PJ, as Catherine Deneueve once said you get to a point where you choose your figure or your face – Kim is still slim but definitely packing a few more pounds than SJP – size zero does not a youthful face make SJP, sorry, her face is long to begin with (and I like her don’t get me wrong) – just sayin’! I think it”s sad the media feeds so much on supposed female b-tch fights, they make great comedy together, who cares if they are best buddioes, no one cares about male actors all being bosom buddies.

  20. wow says:

    AAAAGGGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!

  21. Ally says:

    Agree, LolaBella! First, such a crass ‘joke’ for a series known for witty dialogue, and from a character point of view, the other 3 laugh uproariously even though (a) this is their friend and (b) this was her phobia coming true. A humiliated friend in physical and mental pain: hilarious!

    Fail. Shame on the producers, i.e. King and SJP. This was the great script they’d been waiting for?!

    Part of the overall trend over the years of the Carrie character becoming more bird-brained, designer-obsessed and prudish… i.e. turning into SJP by all accounts. She’s broken up with Big for almost a year and not one boyfriend for the former SATC columnist? Ridiculous.

  22. original kate says:

    i loved the show but i agree that carrie became less likeable as the seasons went on. season 1 – she was sweet, smart and cute; season 5 -she was an empty headed narcissist. i saw the movie with a bunch of girlfriends and a couple of gay male friends and we all agreed the best part of the movie was when we went out for martinis afterwards!

  23. moo says:

    knees are the ugliest parts of a woman’s body – even uglier than “that”. I don’t care how kick ass your body is, your knees will still look like crap.

    look above again if you don’t believe me…..

  24. fizXgirl314 says:

    Cattral is starting to have old lady knees… but COME ON… that’s cuz she IS an old lady… there’s nothing wrong with being old…

    say it with me celebrities “it’s ok to be old, it’s ok to be old, it’s ok to be old… ”

    phew, now doesn’t that feel better? :/

  25. fizXgirl314 says:

    tommysgirl, I agree with you… kim cattral’s acting is sooo over the top usually… actually, they are all kind of caricatures of real women… the cute doe eyed one who is a little TOO cute and TOO doe eyed… and the synical one who is a little TOO cynical and a little TOO bitter… Most women aren’t usually just one thing… they have a spectrum of characteristics…

    Carrie seems to be the only one who encompasses a few more characteristics than just one… but even she’s still kind of a caricature of a real woman…

    anyway, my point was that I agree with you about cattral’s acting…

  26. dovesgate says:

    SJP just needs to gain 5-10lbs to put some more fat in her face. Or, if she feels better about surgery instead of eating, I’d graciously donate a pound or ten from my ass. 😀

  27. Kim says:

    totally agree w/ u on Kim’s acting, and want to add her comedy timing is amazing!

    Honestly if they hadn’t been so lucky in casting Kim as Samantha the show would not have made it past season 2. Period. It was good, but she gave it the extra bit of sparkle.

    For those that think Kim’s acting was over the top, that was the character. Samantha was the over the top person we have have in our circle of friends. While it may not always be over the top sex wise, we all know that person that doesn’t have an inside voice with certain things for example.

  28. WTF?!? says:

    “Aging diva battle”.
    *sigh*
    No wonder women of a certain age are regarded as desperate and useless. That’s how women paint them, too.
    Sad.

  29. KateNonymous says:

    @moo, Are men’s knees significantly more attractive?

  30. j says:

    @KateNonymous: i guess you can’t see them anyway cos men usually wear trousers!