Princess Kate’s BAFTA glovemaker: ‘Opera gloves are transformative’

If you ask me, it’s going to be a while until the Princess of Wales lives down her terrible appearance at Sunday night’s BAFTAs. She’s worn stupid clothes before, and she’s shown that she has a consistently bad eye for styling, but her BAFTA ensemble was a whole new level of style f–kery. Maybe that was the point, though? She wanted attention. So she threw a roll of toilet paper across her shoulder, donned her opera gloves and the cheapest-looking Zara earrings she could find and she got herself some attention. While I definitely think that’s part of it, I also just think… Kate is terrible at styling herself, and she hires stylists who don’t know what they’re doing. It’s a matter of taste, and in Kate’s case, it’s a matter of class. She’s too middle-class to understand that she shouldn’t be dripping in diamonds and pearls at funerals and Remembrance Day wreath-layings. She’s too tasteless to understand that the BAFTAs is the event for which she should bring out her bling. Plus, she knows that everyone will fall all over themselves to praise her, no matter what she’s wearing. Speaking of:

The Princess of Wales, 41, attended the BAFTA Awards alongside Prince William on Sunday wearing perhaps her most daring red carpet look to date — including a dramatic pair of full-length opera gloves. Princess Kate refashioned a white Grecian-inspired Alexander McQueen dress (her wedding gown designer!), which she wore to the same event in 2019, by swapping the corsage detail on the shoulder to a flowing sweep of white chiffon, making the look instantly feel more fashion-forward. But it was her bold choice of accessories for the star-studded event — in particular, the contrasting full-length black velvet opera gloves — which stole the show.

“Opera gloves are transformative; they have enormous leverage,” Genevieve James, creative director at royal glove supplier Cornelia James, tells PEOPLE. “They turn any event into an occasion and a dress into a statement.”

James, whose independent family business has been supplying gloves to the royal family for over 70 years, is unable to confirm that Kate is wearing her design (their identical “Melissa” black velvet style retails for $216). But Kate does have several styles from the brand, which she most recently wore in Boston in December.

Exuding old-school Hollywood glamour, the elegant accessory gave a nostalgic nod to red carpet events of the past when the likes of Grace Kelly, Marilyn Monroe and Rita Hayworth rarely attended an event without their immaculately fitted gloves, often in silk or sometimes bejeweled.

“Imagine Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany’s without the gloves — it’s just another little black dress. With the gloves, it becomes iconic and emblematic of our age — always relevant, always contemporary,” says James, who supplied the late Queen Elizabeth II with her signature white gloves for decades.

Kate also went bold (and budget-friendly!) in her choice of earrings for the event, which was attended by celebrities such as Cate Blanchett, Viola Davis and Julianne Moore and held for the first time at the Royal Festival Hall in London’s Southbank Centre. The rose gold effect, oversized floral earrings from Zara cost just $28. Featuring rhinestone appliqué, the statement earrings are — of course — sold out.

[From People]

The cheapness of the Zara earrings is perhaps Kate’s f–k you to the event, correct? Kate looks for excuses to raid the Royal Collection or the Diana archives, but on the rare occasion when she’s supposed to circulate with A-list celebrities wearing their finest frocks and jewels, suddenly Kate TPs herself and wears cheap Zara earrings. It’s just so bizarre. As for this glove-maker crowing about the importance of gloves… lol, no. I mean, the thing about Audrey Hepburn wearing gloves is that her gloves always looked chic and appropriately styled for the outfit. Kate just threw on a pair of opera gloves with no connection to her dress.

As for the butt-touching thing… she really did graze William’s ass, and the British tabloids have been calling all of their “body language experts” to spread the good word that Kate is sassy and she has so much chemistry with William. It’s weird how none of the body-language experts suggest that Kate is perhaps giving the audience a subtle confirmation to William’s oft-rumored sexual needs.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

130 Responses to “Princess Kate’s BAFTA glovemaker: ‘Opera gloves are transformative’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. K8erade says:

    Ugh. Just another example of having to go overboard to sell someone on something. Kate’s gloves were over the top. The whole look was over the top and gaudy – even for the BAFTAs. I’m just incredibly bored and tired by these two children masquerading as adults in overpriced clothing.

    • Chloe says:

      Wouldn’t it technically be more budget friendly if she went with earrings that are part of the royal collection and thus are already there? They’ve been around for decades if not centuries and wouldn’t have to be purchased.

      • Becks1 says:

        Just because something is cheap (like the Zara earrings) doesn’t mean its….what, thrifty, relatable, sustainable, IDK what she was going for with those. Wearing something of quality multiple times would be more sustainable and a better look overall IMO (not just once, but several times.) She never gets criticized for things like her Penelope Chilvers boots or her Barbour coats because she has worn those items for years.

        Putting aside that the earrings looked awful with that dress, I just hate when she dresses down like that, especially at events like this. We all know she has diamonds. No one thinks “oh the princess of wales wore Zara earrings, she’s just like me!”

      • Jais says:

        And isn’t Zara based out of Spain or am I wrong? Is there not an equivalent British brand? Topshop maybe? But that still wouldn’t address the lack of sustainability. Honestly wonder if she is telegraphing her true inner feelings about actresses by wearing cheap and gaudy earrings to the BAFTAS? Cannot think of any reasonable explanation for wearing them.

      • mary says:

        “..she is just like me!” – I hope not. Never been the most stylish woman but even I know: NOPE not like that.

    • Layla says:

      @k8erade agreed. The bar is set so low for this woman that they held its burial. This was k’s outfit for the funeral

    • May Bench says:

      But William wore a black velvet jacket to match Kate’s fugly black velvet gloves. Doesn’t matchy match count?

      • Mary Pester says:

        No, lol, not when the jacket is a good size to small! (he needs to lay off the carbs) not when the shoes are so shiny that he spends the whole evening worshiping in his own reflection. Not when the gloves are, 1, of the wrong material, 2, they do not go with a floaty dress and 3, not when you wear cheap tacky earings. It’s a complete epic fail for both of them. And was she touching his bum to check he had remembered to put his pants on underneath, 😂😂

    • kelleybelle says:

      And burn those earrings. This is all performative, right? We know they read social media. Not too swift, are they?

    • Where'sMyTiara says:

      Her whole outfit is giving Cruella deVille. Which, apt… and Workshy Wanderdick’s outfit makes him look like an overstuffed black sausage.

      Sartorial elegance? Oh, I think not.

    • Should have read gloves are so transformative and so is botox, Khate is wearing both this evening

    • JDMyrick says:

      This outfit is screaming “Burn after wearing”.

    • SenseOfTheAbsurd says:

      Kind of like that in half the photos it looks like she has no arms.

    • Yes Kate’s opera gloves are transformative. It definitely transformed her into a laughingstock. Pathetic and unstylish woman.

  2. B says:

    I glanced quickly at one of the pictures and thought “wait, are they actually holding hands?”
    Nope. But the black of her glove blended in with the black of his jacket just right. Also the white fabric pops and draws the eye away any way.
    Do you think that maybe this was done to try to draw the eye away from the lack of touching? Same for those earrings. Draws the eye away from their hands.

    • Chloe says:

      I still think she didn’t actually tap him on the but. What i think that after her failed attempt to hold his hand, she swaying her arms as she is walking and it grazes his jacket, causing it to go slightly lift. Her gloves are black and his trousers are too, get thr right angle and viola! It looks asif she gave him a tap.

      • Anita says:

        That’s how I interpreted what I saw on the video, too.

      • Seraphina says:

        @Chloe, I too agree with your statement. And I think she doesn’t have it in her to do something so brazen as touch his bum on purpose on a stage like that.

    • Becks1 says:

      Its really weird bc the black gloves in some pictures almost make it look like she has no arms bc they blend into the background.

  3. India says:

    I just can’t with these two. Peggy preening fiddling with his bow tie. Khhate preening thinking she’s the queen of the world in her heinous ensemble. They are just horrible people. Jealous, petty, sneaky liars. Neither is worth a damn.

    • Chloe says:

      She really does love the attention and all of those cameras pointed at her flashing in her face. She’s the attention seeker they accuse meghan of being. She was feeling like queen B on sunday

      • Jais says:

        Yeah, Kaiser mentions it but Kate really has an almost perverse need for attention. I’d be mortified if I was known for copying my more beautiful sil’s style, but Kate just keeps on doing it. Is it just another part of her attention-seeking?

      • Nic919 says:

        This is someone who had multiple incidents where her non weighted skirts flew up and exposed her for all and sundry. After the first incident most people would have worn weighted or fitted skirts in public engagements. Not kate. She continued doing this until Meghan arrived. And even almost did it at Eugenie’s wedding.

  4. equality says:

    Wonder how many of their “subjects” can lay out 216 for a pair of gloves. But it’s okay because her earrings were only 28? Or is she supposed to be frugal because she rewore a dress? Is that why she made a point to be in something she wore previously to the same event?

    • Josephine says:

      I think that they’ve fallen so low that they are now shilling for crappy clothing companies. Did she strike a deal with the maker of the gloves? They sure had a statement ready to go. They really are the epitome of tacky. Abolish the monarchy.

      • Jais says:

        That article was def giving spon-con vibes.

      • equality says:

        With how it called her the “royal glovemaker”, she likely has a royal seal given by TQ. The whole family spon-con’s but gives it a different name.

      • ThatsNotOkay says:

        The fabric from the gloves and the dress don’t match. And I don’t mean just because they’re not the same fabric, I meant they don’t go together or complement each other. It’s tacky all the way around. Then add the fact that they’re too long and the wrong color, and it’s an atrocity. She wore black velour gloves to match William’s black velour jacket, neither of which worked on either person. Thus, these two clowns are a match made in hell.

    • BeanieBean says:

      They ‘couldn’t’ confirm those were their gloves, I’m thinking because she bought some cheap gloves at the same place she bought those cheap earrings. They don’t really look velvet to me, they look like some cheap nylon fabric. ‘Cause, you know, she’s cheap (had to use that word one more time! 😉 .

      • blacktoypoodle says:

        Thank you, exactly. They shouldn’t have that synthetic fiber sheen in the flash photography. I have cheap synthetic gloves like that. Have worn them to events bc no one is taking my photo for the press. I did have a fab matte black elbow length pair but lost them. 🙁

    • Lorelei says:

      It likely cost a pretty penny to have the dress changed so much*, so to act like “Thrifty Kate strikes again with her rewears!” is so disingenuous.

      *IDK what the situation is— does the palace have its own tailors? The Queen had AK14 but she seems to have been kicked to the curb, and idk if altering a McQueen or whatever like this is in her wheelhouse anyway? Charles seems to get everything done from various professionals on Savile Row, although they probably come to him.

      So I’m going on the assumption that Kate had the actual designer do the alterations, because that’s usually how it happens when she wears a dress that is in a current collection, but has alterations made to make it more modest. God knows if they charge her full price or if they charge her anything, even though we’re supposed to pretend they never accept freebies or discounts.

  5. Jais says:

    If the toilet paper is covering one of the gloves, what’s the freaking point of them in the first place.?

    • Aurora says:

      This article just confirmed to me that Meghan inspired Kate’s gloves. It’s the need to try to claim gloves as revolutionary because Kate wore them that gives it away. Kate’s desire to claim everything Meghan gets praised for is weird.

  6. Amy Bee says:

    One of the worst outfits she’s ever worn. She should hire a proper stylist, she has the money to do it now. Where’s the outrage for Kate’s inappropriate behaviour at a public event?

    • The Hench says:

      What’s even more of an achievement is taking one of her most elegant, successful looks (imo) of the last time she wore this dress to the BAFTAs, with the original shoulder design, her hair up in a chignon and lovely diamond and pearl earrings plus serious diamond cuff bracelet and turning it into ….this mess.

      • Roop says:

        @The Hench, I agree. I normally hate her outfits, but I loved her 2019 BAFTAS look.

        However – why is she trying to repeat it (sort of) the very next time she goes to the BAFTAS? Why didn’t she recycle and update a dress from another event? Why was she like “oh I liked the dress I wore to that event the last time I went to it, so I’ll wear it again.” I think it sends a message that she really can’t be bothered to make the most minimal effort to put on clothes. And let’s face it, putting on clothes is all that Katie Keen does or is known for.

        So at the last minute she grabbed her frock that she’s already worn to this event, threw on some opera gloves and cheap earrings that she had lying around, and pranced out the door.

        Ridiculous.

      • Lorelei says:

        @The Hench, exactly. I completely agree with you. The first time she wore that dress, I actually loved it and thought that she looked beautiful. And it’s extremely rare that I love anything she wears anymore. I thought knocked it out of the park that night.

        So for her to have ruined a dress that gorgeous makes this whole thing that much more egregious. It’s on-brand for Kate to ruin things though, so.

        @Roop is is beyond bizarre that she chose to “recycle” a dress from the last time she went to the same event. WTH? Everything about this ensemble was weird and wrong.

    • TigerMcQueen says:

      I just cannot get over how hideous the ensemble is every time I look at it. The gloves look like compression sleeves FFS. Nothing goes together, and if it were anyone more self aware wearing that mess, I’d think they did it as a joke.

      • Lorelei says:

        It really does come across as a dressy version of an ugly-Christmas-sweater-party look. Like she *tried* to look as ridiculous as possible.

  7. Roo says:

    All those words that exclaim the virtues of gloves without saying, truly saying, that THAT outfit was well done. It must be exhausting to be a RR. You have to smell farts and talk about perfume.

    • diANNa says:

      Agree! I thought it was really funny how People Mag used words like “daring” and “bold” in place of adjectives which would convey admiration or approval for her outfit. Words associated with kissing Kate’s behind when describing her evening appearances usually include “stunning”, “beautiful”, etc. but complimentary adjectives were noticeably absent.
      Instead we got “the gloves stole the show”. So shady!

    • Celine says:

      « The cheapness of the Zara earrings is perhaps Kate’s f–k you to the event, correct? » that’s a really good point, Kaiser. Like she is indirectly saying: all you celebrated show biz people are plebes I wouldn’t want to make you jealous by wearing my regular jewels! and it was also a rare occasion that she wore gloves which conveniently mean big blue is not around, or possibly, covered. Maybe I like this outfit so much on her because I am not a fan of The Ring.

      I actually really love this look! I have noticed nobody likes it even her fans and I am not seeing what you are all seeing. I feel it’s kind of editorial vogue, but toned down since she’s a royal. I don’t like people constantly buying these kind of dramatic costume jewelry that don’t last (big metal Zara earrings) but since they are obviously brand new and still golden I like them and the large size suits her and the outfit. And she has the arms for those gloves. I like the idea of gloves for ladies being more popular since elaborate manicures’ standards for women are so much higher than the standard for mens hands. But I detest those rock star gloves that Madonna and Paris Hilton wear, and bright coloured and elaborate gloves aren’t my taste either.

  8. Noki says:

    First of all isn’t rude to ask another designer to alter someone else’s work? Lastly I think what she is trying to do is simply have iconic archive images for twenty years down the line. Like the 80s fashion they were hideous but those Dynasty Fashions are still talked about.

    • Chloe says:

      Kate genuinely likes 80’s fashion though. Personally i think it was a terrible fashion era, with all the puff sleeves and the frills and ruching. Most of the Diana outfits that I strongly dislike are from the 80’s and that includes her wedding dress.

      • Noki says:

        Sure, but my point is that she does it to cement some sort of icon status which she shouldn’t have to since she is a future Queen.

      • Tessa says:

        Kate would wear krystle carrington hairstyle if she wanted to channel the eighties.

    • Belli says:

      Asking McQueen to change Givenchy bridesmaid dresses comes to mind.

    • MoonTheLoon says:

      But she’s the Princess of Wales now, doncha know? She must be an icon at all costs! She must be an icon to follow in the footsteps of her late MIL and prevent her much loathed SIL from being. Nevermind that said SIL is kinda already there. 🙄

  9. Miranda says:

    She can wear all the “transformative” accessories she wants but she’s still not going to transform into Meghan, Diana, QEII, or even just a decent human being.

  10. Tessa says:

    It is imo an insult to their memory to put fashion icons like grace Kelly and audrey Hepburn in an article about keen and to that outfit she wore

  11. C-Shell says:

    Was there ever a fairy tale written that more perfectly hits the Windsors than “The Emperor’s New Clothes”??????? Prescient and eerily accurate. Anyway, this entire, random assortment of wrong fashion elements was an epic fail even for KKKHate-Never-Met-a-Ruffle-Peplum-Button-I-Can-Live-Without.

  12. Steph says:

    I’m shocked you didn’t bring up how terrible her hair looks with this dress. Why isn’t it up?!

    • Tessa says:

      Kate cannot carry off the straight hair look.

    • The Hench says:

      Yes, the backcombed wiglet is badly blended once again. In that side view of her greeting people you can see how weird the hair partings look. I’m not great at spotting where the hairpieces join but it looks as though her real hair has been pulled back by the top of her ears and then the false stuff placed over the top. They should give the wiglet its own BAFTA for acting as her hair….

      • Becks1 says:

        Its really obvious in the pictures of her talking to people after the event and in the picture where William is fixing his bowtie. I think that picture is the most obvious bc her hair isn’t pushed all the way behind her ears, so you can clearly see how the wiglet falls differently.

        Why wouldn’t her hair stylist blend it better? I don’t get it.

  13. Izzy says:

    Truly, they are. Those gloves managed to transform a mediocre outfit into The Hot Mess Express.

    • WHAT says:

      What’s overlooked is even the designer doesn’t say that she’s wearing the 🧤 he designed. He says more about iconic figures than princess 🧱 and just says its performance. The overall look was bad and peggers and his vanilla ice wife once again can’t keep themselves in the news cause yesterday the rota was 🔙 to talking about CA 🤣

  14. Tessa says:

    So hypocritical for media to fawn over Kate supposedly being sassy when she touched William yet the sussexes are trashed for holding hands.

  15. girl_ninja says:

    It’s possible that Willy got a good pegging before the awards. Maybe she wore her gloves during the peg session.

  16. Digital Unicorn says:

    I know I should be embarrassed for her over the VERY deliberate effort by the press to big her and her ‘fashion’ up but am not – she and her team (i.e. Ma) are likely paying these people to spout this sh!t about her.

    No amount of fake hair, makeup, nice clothes and fancy jewels will hide the stench of Middleton desperation. The aliens underground on Mars can smell it.

    • Becks1 says:

      It’s funny bc this kind of article tells you that KP is very aware of how that look was received on social media and is now trying to convince us that it was actually very fashion forward!

      • Debbie says:

        I agree, I think KP was well aware of the online mockery of Kate’s black gloves, and that’s why we are now getting an “Ode to a Black Velvel Glove” in People magazine.

  17. Lola09 says:

    Lol, yep they transformed an always-badly-dressed, over tweaked useless bint with a raging eating disorder into…all of the above on steroids 🤦🏻‍♀️

  18. Sugarhere says:

    If she had chosen off-white or beige LACE gloves, it would have suited the Ancient Greece style dress. But this is a definite no, no.

    Now speaking of Catherine’s body language, it seems she’s unsuccessfully repeating her Boston attempt at holding hands with her husband, who sadistically shirks away. It’s the second time in a matter of months that Bullyiam’s wife of 12 years who’s been his partner for 20, has been bluntly denied to copy Meghan’s display of affection.

    William’s very vexatious unloving response is evidence these two barely communicate as husband and wife, are emotionally and sexually estranged, and that Kate is afraid to bring up the subject in private. That’s some bone-chilling conjugal dynamics!

    • Belli says:

      The black might have even worked with a white dress that was more structured and all black accessories. This was a mash up of so many clashing ideas that all they ended up with was a mess.

  19. Brit says:

    She looked terrible. You literally have to have fear of losing access or a royalist fanatic to think she looked good. Believe, those papers and writers were probably laughing at her but they have to tow the line.

  20. Nic919 says:

    If we flipped the gender on who tapped who on the ass after being rejected from holding hands I don’t think the media pretends it’s cute. I think we need to consider this because while William is not into pda it is his choice not to want it and she is not respecting that choice. Married or not there is no obligation if someone is not into being physically touched.

    • Debbie says:

      I thought the same about that pat on the butt too. It happened after Kate tried to hold his hand, and William clearly avoided the hand holding effort, which is his right. The moment reminded me of when the Trumps exited a plane and Donald tried to hold Melania’s hand as he began going down the stairs. I noticed that Trump had a problem with stairs, maybe he was afraid of losing his balance and falling, so he clutched railings like a lifeline, and he took the opportunity to hold women by the hand when he could whenever going down steep stairs. I remember he even took Theresa May’s hand when she was the Prime Minister of England, just as he was going down some stairs on camera. So, on the occasion that Trump tried to hold Melania’s hand, she quickly moved hers away, but Trump wouldn’t have it, so he tried again, if I recall. He just wouldn’t be denied or embarrassed in public. At the BAFTAs, William was very deliberate about not holding Kate’s hand when she wanted it, and Kate seemed to be playing to the cameras when she lightly spanked him publicly. She’s not going to be embarrassed on camera.

      • Deanne from Canada says:

        Agree with everything.

        On a side note, Deuxmoi published a speedy video of (possibly) W & K (for sure ) out in a pub Dabbling Duck in Norfolk out with 6 other friends in the back room. A stones throw from Sandringham apparently (no idea if they keep a home there too). Odd that they were seen out in public (semi) together. Maybe to dispel separation rumours?

  21. Lola09 says:

    Also can everyone (i.e. the shittiest elements of the BM) STOP praising her ‘thriftiness’?! Why is anyone giving her brownie points for wearing Zara earrings or occasionally wearing an outfit twice?? Apparently she spent £98,000 or $128,000 in 2020 (let’s all recall btw what a wonderful and wealthy year that was for regular people…) and it’s bound to be more since then. Absolutely abhorrent.

    • Nic919 says:

      Also there is no way that dress was altered for free. It is a significant alteration if it is the same dress.

  22. dawnchild says:

    Black defines line/shape…in this case, the armpit length makes her arms look shorter, sausage casing-like, and shows up the weird, shoulders rolled forward manner (hands facing nearly all the way back) in which she carried herself.
    That pose looks okay with athletic gear, but not with the uber-feminine glamour she’s shooting for here.
    And that’s just the gloves…
    Like others said, a hot mess anyway…

  23. Becks1 says:

    This was just such a bad look for her. The gloves were the crowning “glory” – it was like she looked in the mirror before she left, decided she needed “one more thing” and added the gloves. If she had paired the gloves with black earrings of some kind, black shoes – it might have worked better as a look. If she had paired the gloves with a different dress, even that same dress without the arm/draping/caping thing it might have worked better as a look. etc. Different hair would have helped.

    I just don’t understand how she is so bad at this, how there is no one who said to her, you know what, that’s not working ,lets change it up.

    • Jojo says:

      No one and nothing will ever convince me that she looked in an actual mirror before leaving the house in that outfit.

  24. CindyP says:

    A flowing chiffon dress with black velvet gloves & cheap mall earrings is NOT “fashion forward”. Don’t even get me started with that hair. What a mess. Why does she not have a real professional stylist?

  25. Sarah says:

    She has so many clothes. If she spent money on a stylist, that person could style her beautifully using all the clothes and jewels she has already. Then she’d get bonus points for being “thrifty” all the time.

  26. Mrs. Smith says:

    I think Kaiser is giving K too much credit. I do not believe she’s trolling the BAFTAS with her clever outfit. She is not that bright. She put on a truly odd ensemble that her personal assistant said “Um, it looks stunning ma’am” as K pranced away, eager for all the attention she’d get on the carpet. That’s it.

    What will be telling about her style is her next major event where she walks a red carpet. Fingers crossed that her “bold” new PR person brings in a stylist to up K’s fashion game.

  27. C says:

    I didn’t hate the outfit – it would have been much better either to keep the dress, relaxed hair, and earrings and ditch the gloves.
    But if she had to do the gloves, Diana’s Collingwood pearl drops that she always wears would have been much better.

  28. Velvet Elvis says:

    You know, I could almost forgive what she was trying to do with the gloves if not for those gaudy earrings.

    • Imara219 says:

      Honestly, at first view, I didn’t mind the outfit (not the earrings but the dress and gloves). I thought it was cute. I thought the gloves were black leather, and I thought it looked dramatic and cool with the dress. Then I noticed the gloves were velvet and that threw me all the way off. Nevermind! I don’t know why that one detail derailed the look for me, but it did.

  29. Cessily says:

    I truthfully don’t understand how the people of Britain don’t puke up their breakfast every morning seeing the sickening headlines about how wonderful and stylish this pathetic and classless woman is. As for body language experts what an absolute joke!

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Considering our media won’t cover the food shortages in our supermarkets – its all over twitter under the Brexitisfailing hash tag. But thats not the headlines the tories and their media puppets want the voting plebs to see. Much better to trot out a royal show pony decked out in new clothes that the cost could help feed the populace, help keep them warm and give our public services a decent pay rise.

      We should never forget that every time she is seen in public wearing something new its paid for by the UX tax payer as an expense.

      • Lauren says:

        Wait, the UK is having food shortages?!?! What the hell is going on the UK

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Fresh produce is currently being rationed due to ‘supply chain’ issues: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-64718823

        However its worth noting that the EU block are not having the same issues as us with the people there getting access to fresh produce. The British media are downplaying the affects of Brexit which decimated our own farmers (who are struggling to find labour).

  30. Noor says:

    The fashion mag can say the tight armpit length black velvet gloves are transformative but twitter has decided its ghastly.

  31. CC says:

    Transform your outfit from ‘meh’ to ‘huh?’ in one easy step!

    • Lulu08 says:

      The velvet gloves look cheap with the dress. She looks like a little girl who raided her mother’s closet to play dress up.

      I do not understand this woman’s jewelry choices. She wears the most bling possible at inappropriate moments, and then at an event where it is appropriate- she chooses Zara ?!?

  32. Alex Weld says:

    There’s something off with the decolletage on this dress–it makes her neck and chest area look…squat, for lack of a better word. Sad, because I normally think it’s one of her most elegant features. The black and white combo reads waiter to me.

  33. First comment says:

    Yesterday, I was sure that she was trolling William with this kind of outfit.. I think whenever she’s forced to “work ” , she lets her disappointment and resentment show : isn’t it the school mid term in England? She had to interrupt her vacations to make an appearance on bafta with William. I thought the same thing happened to Boston with the green screen dress..she obviously didn’t want to go. But, yesterday, I read somewhere that she combined the black gloves, the gold shoes and earrings and the white gown because black, white and gold are the colors of the logo on Baftas!!! I don’t know which version of logical explanation is worse….

    • Becks1 says:

      omg. The logo thing makes so much sense, because that’s how her mind works.

      • Lorelei says:

        That is totally it! She was just theme-dressing as usual, this time as the logo. FFS. Ridiculous, but it’s the only explanation that makes any sense.

  34. Rapunzel says:

    Cornelia James makes silk and tulle opera gloves that would have been far more appropriate for this chiffon dress. They have a tulle pair in light green that would’ve been much prettier.

  35. Over it says:

    Well this is just one large pile of horse-shit. Kate look like crap. End of .
    The thing I have noticed with these two. No matter if he is pretending to touch her, he can never fix his face to look at her while doing it and when he is finally forced to . It’s always a look of disappointment, disbelief and disgust. These two are pathetic and the people who keep falling over themselves to praise them for walking straight are sad .

  36. one of the marys says:

    It’s bizarre the tabloids go on about pda because it looks to me like William is trying to get her to stop touching him. When he puts his hand on her shoulder he’s creating space and stopping her movement.
    The royal glove supplier cracks me up. There’s a royal brand for everything I guess. More propaganda

  37. Over it says:

    Why are two of those men standing in that picture with Kate have Their eyes closed like they are praying for grace to get through this meet and greet with her or is she really that boring ?

  38. Mimi says:

    It was transformative alright….it transformed the entire outfit into something awful!!!

  39. aquarius64 says:

    The defense of the opera gloves and the butt graze means Kate and KP saw the dragging she got for both. Bad fashion sense and bad state of affairs in the Wales marriage are not the reaction they wanted.

    • Kit says:

      They are literally all over the DM about this tapping of William butt and their loved up show lol , seriously they ignored each other once inside , is this coming from their new PR person or what, cant wait.to see this duo in round two , l.actually feel a bit sorry for William , no way is he getting away from his wife ever !!!

      But seriously black velvet gloves.with a light white dress what.was she thinking , those Zara earrings are worn with summery maxi dresses on edgy people, Kate isnt one of those , gold shoes should be left to Carole, hair was awful , makeup usual disaster, why can’t she hire a professional from.British Vogue or even Net a Porter.?

  40. Mary S says:

    I’m no fashion expert. But even my untrained eye knew that ensemble Kate wore was a whole train wreck.

    • Truthiness says:

      I like the idea of black opera gloves but is a deep purple column dress so hard to get? Okay, dark emerald then. There’s no amount of vaseline over the camera lens that saves this outfit.

  41. Mtl.ex.pat says:

    Oh man – I remember in Montreal in 1988 being at a college formal dance where gloves like that were the THING. So we all had them with our dresses and corsages. I had a black off the shoulder sleeveless dress and black gloves that went up between elbow and shoulder. I was 18 and I tell you I was the cat’s meow that night 😂🤓

  42. QuiteContrary says:

    “You keep using that word, transformative. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

  43. Gabby says:

    The dress and gloves combo makes her look like a mime. A bitter, haggard mime.

  44. HeatherC says:

    IF she had to keep the earrings and the dress and the gloves…the gloves should have been a soft gold, and the tiny purse as well (why does she bother carrying one?). JMHO

  45. Em says:

    The comparison to the elegant goddess that was Audrey Hepburn is offensive lol

  46. emi_5 says:

    I don’t understand the choice of earrings at all. Presumably an attempt to appear thrifty and at-one-with-the-people.
    But Zara is a huge fast fashion brand that contributes enormously to landfill. There are highly concerning statistics around fast fashion brands in general with regards to sustainability AND ethics with regards to human rights. The whole industry quite literally fuels the climate crisis. Alongside earthflop I fail to see how that’s in any way a clever choice of jewelry for someone with so much power to do better (and send better messages)
    Absolute fail!

  47. HeyKay says:

    Gotta love the professional opera glove maker. 💕
    No shame in trying to drum up some business, he got his own bills to pay.

    Other than Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffanys, when is the last time you saw anyone wear full length opera gloves?
    Those dopey Southern Deb Balls are only once a year.
    Guys gotta make a living.

  48. [insert_catchy_name] says:

    I cannot believe there is a single person on this planet who would find that dress/gloves combination anything but terrible.

  49. Monlette says:

    They are transformative. And in long black with white gown, they draw the eye away from the face so people don’t notice the “freshening up” you had done since the last time you wore it.

  50. Azblue says:

    I would pay good money to read a real life “Lady Whistledown” take on Kates outfit. What do the aristos say in their secret little circles about Kates gauche outfits and Will’s recreational activities?

  51. Mrs.Krabapple says:

    Kate’s dress is a sad and tacky ripoff of Beatrice Borromeo’s Armani wedding gown from 2015.

    tinyurl.com/2hddwrzy
    tinyurl.com/3yc4r93j

  52. HeyKay says:

    Re: Ear rings.
    Why would anyone who can get their hands on the actual jewelry of the BRF not wear it?
    Are ya insane?
    That RF jewelry collection is the ONLY reason to marry into that hot mess of loonies.
    I’m kidding, sort of.
    I can’t help it. I have always been fascinated by the jewelry, ever since I was a kid.
    Wallis Simpson and Elizabeth Taylor had such gorgeous real jewelry, that many pieces were custom made and spectacular works of craftsmanship, just Wow factor.
    I’ve watched docs about the Royal jewels and Faberge eggs and it just dazzles me.

    Hell, I’d walk around in my sweatshirt and a flipping tiara on just to piss off Camilla.

    Btw, I’m against wealth hoarding, stealing fabulous jewels from their country of origin, blood diamonds, and accepting huge pieces of jewelry from vile dictators, etc. also huge Downton Abbey type houses. If I hit the Powerball, I’d want one tho. Blame my Harlequin Romance teenage self. 👍

  53. Andrea says:

    I’m no opera glove expert but I swear those are too long. They’re not supposed to go that far up the bicep! The ideal length is just above the elbow. As it is, one disappears into the sleeve so it looks even more bizarre. I could see that length for a sleeveless or narrow strapped gown but even though the gloves are nice they look awful as part of the outfit.

  54. Amaranta says:

    Think is, gloves *could* have been okay. But elasticized black velvet armpit-length? If anything, it should’ve been satin in very lightly tinted delicate pink or baby blue, and no longer than just below the elbow. Ideally, NO GLOVES AT ALL. A cocktail ring, simple, unfussy earrings (drippy with gemstone) that drop no longer than the bend of her jaw, or large studs. But let the dress be the main event, as ridiculous as the TP fall is.

    Her stylist must hate her.

  55. j.ferber says:

    Well, what else will the glove maker say, the truth, that Kate looks all kinds of stupid in those gloves and that dress? Never gonna happen, but it’s true.

  56. Tessa says:

    Comparing r i t a Hayworth in her iconic put the blame on m a m e gown with gloves from the film Gilda to boring Kate in her chiffon gown is a total absurdity. What are those writers thinking