Prince Harry attended court in London for his lawyer’s closing arguments

Prince Harry did show up for the final day of the four-day pre-trial hearing in his lawsuit against the Mail/ANL. He came to court a bit later than he did on Monday and Tuesday, and we still don’t know why he skipped court on Wednesday. Fingers crossed, it was to finish packing up Frogmore Cottage so the Sussex family will have no more ties to that godforsaken family. Harry rolled up to court on Thursday wearing another slim-cut suit and a Dior button-down and looking handsome, healthy and well-endowed (it’s true). On the final day, Harry’s lawyer David Sherbourne spoke about the Mail’s gaslighting and lies:

Prince Harry’s lawyer has accused the Daily Mail’s parent company of “gaslighting” victims by covering up its journalists’ alleged illegal behaviour. The barrister David Sherborne alleged that Associated Newspapers publicly insisted it stuck to the law while privately knowing that reporters relied on a wide range of illegal techniques including voicemail interception, blagging of personal information, and placing listening devices inside cars. Associated denies the claims.

Doreen Lawrence has alleged that a Daily Mail journalist instructed a private investigator to target her. She claims this took place at the same time as the Daily Mail was publicly campaigning on behalf of her murdered son, Stephen Lawrence. Sherborne told the high court in London: “That is nothing short of gaslighting Baroness Lawrence. That’s the concealment we are talking about.”

Harry returned to the courtroom on Thursday to observe the closing legal arguments over whether his case will be allowed to proceed to trial. The case could drag the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday into lengthy and expensive legal proceedings like those that have dogged the Sun, the News of the World and the Mirror over the past two decades.

Sherborne told the court that the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday hid their illegal behaviour by disguising the use of inappropriately obtained material in newspaper articles. The lawyer said the newspapers would print illegally gathered material in the form of quotes from “friends” of the victims, leaving individuals convinced that their inner circle had sold them out to the media. He said this tactic was tantamount to covering up crimes. “This creates the very paranoia and suspicion that leads people off the scent,” he said.

Associated Newspapers strongly denies all the allegations as “preposterous smears” and is attempting to have the cases thrown out before they go to a full trial. The publisher told the court that Harry and his fellow claimants were “far too late” in filing their legal paperwork, meaning their cases should not be heard.

Individuals generally have six years after discovering they were potential victims to bring a case. Associated argued that Harry and his fellow claimants should have known they were the potential victims of illegality by the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday in the early 2010s, meaning they had missed the deadline to bring their case. In response, Sherborne said it was impossible for the cases to have been filed earlier because Harry and the other claimants only recently discovered they were potential victims. He also referenced “vociferous and prolific denials of any wrongdoing” made by senior executives at Associated Newspapers under oath to the Leveson inquiry into media ethics.

[From The Guardian]

“He also referenced ‘vociferous and prolific denials of any wrongdoing’ made by senior executives at Associated Newspapers under oath to the Leveson inquiry.” LOL. Mail executives were crying on the record during the Leveson Inquiry about how they would NEVER wiretap or illegally surveil celebrities and royals, then years later, one of their private detectives was like “yeah, Mail editors totally ordered me to wiretap everybody” and now the Mail’s argument is “it’s too late to sue, you should have known we were lying in 2011!!” The British tabloid culture is utterly ridiculous. It’s insane how much power they’ve assumed and gathered, especially given that we’re not exactly dealing with the brain trust of England.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

78 Responses to “Prince Harry attended court in London for his lawyer’s closing arguments”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. K8erade says:

    Nothing would thrill me more than seeing The Daily Mail go completely bankrupt over this. I want to see them lose and be obliterated out of business. I feel so bad for Harry knowing his life was pretty much completely ruined by ANL’s horrible tactics.

  2. Jais says:

    Harry in Dior! Hahaha love it. That said, if the judge dismisses this case before it can go to trial, I’ll be so angry. The whole sorry it’s been over 6 years is so ridiculous.

    • Steph says:

      Want to hear my conspiracy theory regarding wearing Dior? I think he intentionally made sure it could he IDed. He wasn’t showing off for us but flashing wealth as a weapon to ANL letting them know he’s got the funds to take this case all the way.

      • Jais says:

        Yep. And his mom also rocked those iconic Dior bags after the divorce so it could be a way of saying and yeah my mom’s with me too.

    • Carmen says:

      That shirt cost $1000. I googled it.

  3. nutella toast says:

    @Kaiser….the last part of your description of Harry is the Friday I needed this week.

  4. Cel2495 says:

    I hope it goes to trial and they left bankrupt! Go Harry!

  5. Snuffles says:

    I was wrong in assuming he went home on Wednesday. So, that makes me wonder what he was up to on Wednesday. I doubt it had anything to do with Frogmore. I’m sure the tabloids had that place staked out and would have breathlessly reported his every move if he stepped foot on royal grounds.

    Which leaves me with 1) He did some stealth charity visits. 2) Praying he gave his deposition early for the trial that is scheduled to begin in May and therefore won’t have to come back to the UK anytime soon.

    • Amy Bee says:

      @Snuffles: Harry’s lawyers have already confirmed that he will be in London for the Daily Mirror case in May. I’m guessing that he took Wednesday off to have some meetings, like you I don’t think he went to Frogmore at all because the moment he stepped in Windsor there would have been pictures.

      • Snuffles says:

        @amybee

        Can you share that link because I’m going to need to see the EXACT wording. Considering how slick and stealthy Harry has been, he could have actually meant he would come to London for the case but not necessarily is May when the trial begins.

        ETA: Here is the article

        https://bylinetimes.com/2023/03/16/prince-harry-to-appear-in-person-in-phone-hacking-court-case-as-teflon-piers-faces-both-barrels/

        This wasn’t a confirmation. It was an assumption.

      • Amy Bee says:

        @Snuffles: I’m going by what was said in that same Byline times piece. But I admit It could well mean that Harry would be doing a live video-link on the day he has to testify.

      • Becks1 says:

        I think he met with some charities on Wednesday – maybe even members of the British Invictus team or WellChild.

      • Darkwing Duck says:

        Byline say the following “Barrister David Sherborne also confirmed that the arrangement for video-link evidence of witnesses in the seven-week trial starting 9 May “certainly doesn’t involve any of the individual claimants,” seemingly assuring a live public appearance from the Duke.”

        The arrangement for video-link evidence does NOT involve any of the individual claimants. Some witnesses are giving evidence by video-link (hence the arrangements) but that does not include the claimants eg Prince Harry.

        I don’t think it’s incorrect to say that this is confirmation that unless Harry doesn’t plan to give evidence at all he intends to give evidence in person?

        At this moment they are not arranging for him, or any other claimant, to give evidence by video-link.

    • PrincessK says:

      Visited the tailor to get fitted for his Coronation outfit.

  6. Nicky says:

    They are guilty of terrorism with their spying and paying for stories.

    It’s a form of terrorism in my view.

    Gutter press have learned NOTHING from the Milly Dowler case.

  7. equality says:

    If the victims should have known years ago then the police should have known years ago and taken action.

    • Izzy says:

      They’re really saying that their victims should have known at the time because ANL always commits these violations of privacy. I can’t with those idiots.

      • ThatsNotOkay says:

        If these people lied under oath in the other case/inquiry, then they should be tried for perjury and forced to pay restitution.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Doesn’t part of this lawsuit include the fact that police knew AND collaborated with tabloids?

    • Mary Pester says:

      @EQUALITY, that’s what I was thinking, they have contradicted their own bloody argument! WHY should they have KNOWN? If as the mail say the paper hadn’t done anything? What should they have KNOWN, then we get to the mails solicitor saying they have left it to late, so are the mails solicitors saying “yeah but we did it back then but we are good boys now,”, “I mean WTF if you read it logically, they are tantamount to admitting to doing it! Maybe the judge should go and watch the programme” The two princes “I think it was called, or” the prince’s and the press. There we have journalists, editors and private detectives ALL admitting what they had done. We also had the old editor of the sun, saying that’ he was called to the Palace, spoke to prince BULLYAM, who wanted to know WHY he and Kate were not getting the amount of good press that Harry and Megan were, and what could be done about it? And the following day we had Megan made Kate cry!!!

    • Bob says:

      They did, that’s why people got in trouble about it when it happened? Are we all forgetting? It was big news at the time. Harry seems to have forgot also.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Or, @Bob, is the confusion between the different media groups hacking? Harry didn’t forget. Readers of SPARE know that. NGN’s was the BIG scandal back then. Murdoch’s group. rehabber kooks made me lol.
        https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/mar/26/news-of-the-world-publisher-fails-in-bid-to-end-phone-hacking-claims-rupert-murdoch

        The Mirror Group aka Trinity Mirror-now Reach, Plc. was the other big one-I believe, involving Organ Simper(my anagram finder). It sounds like Rothermere’s ANL-Daily Fail/Fail on Sunday, etc.,.is saying the claimants should have known they were doing it along with the other media groups.

        I will laugh at people who claim Harry had is own ‘agency’ at the time and other bullticky. Harry was doing tours in Afghanistan. Harry was operating under the belief that the palace’s lawyers had his best interests.LOL. The evidence against ANL probably didn’t come to light until much later.

        The Teri Hatcher of Fleet Street’s name may come up in the ANL suit.

  8. Izzy says:

    “ Associated argued that Harry and his fellow claimants should have known they were the potential victims of illegality by the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday in the early 2010s”

    They really put forward the argument that their victims should have known ANL had committed a crime at the time they committed the crime and covered it up. MAKE IT MAKE SENSE.

  9. Amy says:

    I wonder if Harry didn’t show on Wednesday to give his father one day of “German State Visit” coverage without being upstaged. I think Harry considers his family far more than any of them have consideration for him. He’s a good egg and much more than the Windsors deserve.

    • Snuffles says:

      Nah. If Harry cared about that he wouldn’t have shown up at all because this hearing already conflicted with the Paris trip. He couldn’t have known it would be cancelled at the last minute.

      • Amy Bee says:

        Yeah, I agree. Plus. it’s clear by now that Harry is not attempting to coordinate with the Palace in anyway.

    • BeanieBean says:

      No, he doesn’t play their little reindeer games any more.

  10. Jan says:

    Meghan and Harry were in Germany, a cardboard cutout of them, there was a guy on a balcony and the cardboard cutout was on the next balcony when Chucky and consort was visiting and if they look up, it would be hard to miss.
    Reminds of the Italian Soccer fans, poster saying Meghan is one of us at the World Cup.

  11. Amy Bee says:

    I’m assuming Harry’s back home now. Even if the judge throws out the case at least the public knows that the DM’s claims that they were never involved in phone hacking etc. are lies.

    • First comment says:

      Exactly! For anyone with basic reading comprehension skills it’s clear that DM is guilty and any dismissal of the case by the judge would be due to a technicality :”Associated argued that Harry and his fellow claimants should have known they were the potential victims of illegality by the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday in the early 2010s”

  12. Inge says:

    Go Ginger Avenger!

  13. Moderatelywealthy says:

    “Harry rolled up to court on Thursday wearing another slim-cut suit and a Dior button-down and looking handsome, healthy and well-endowed (it’s true)”

    Oh, well, Kaiser just came up and found yet another reason for Prince Bulliam and Princess Macbutton to be mad at Harry…

    • CrazyHeCallsMe says:

      Harry’s gone from TKMaxx to wearing Dior. Meghan has definitely taken control of H’s wardrobe. She has her man glowed up.

      • Moderatelywealthy says:

        the Tkmaxxx thing was hilarious. I try to get as far from that store as possible as i hate crowds. and the quality of clothing was bad on the top of it.

  14. Nanea says:

    Harry’s case, brought forward with Doreen Lawrence, Elton John and the others against the Fail ties in nicely with an article today in the Times, where Hugh (ugh) Grant says he wants to destroy the Fail.

    No matter our (recent) opinion on HG, but he played a big part in the Leveson inquiry and in keeping the fight against the gutter trash papers going with the Hacked Off campaign.

  15. Steph says:

    He’s been looking like the You Coulda Had a Bad Bitch 2.0 tour.

  16. ThatsNotOkay says:

    All of Rupert Murdoch’s entities, except those in his native Australia, embroiled in scandal and on trial. I do love to see it. Each and every one needs to be litigated into bankruptcy, Murdoch forbidden from owning any media entity moving forward, and his US citizenship revoked. Let’s do this.

    • Nanea says:

      Lachlan Murdoch is litigating in Australia.

      A blog (?) is facing a defamation lawsuit brought forward by LM because the Murdoch family was called Trump’s “unindicted co-conspirators” following the 2021 riot at the US Capitol.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Well, with all of the text messages that Dominion got hold of through discovery and filed in court, it certainly appears that they were co-conspirators.

  17. Noor says:

    This is a case with a huge public interest. Hopefully it will lead to fundamental changes in the press industry and lead also to government setting up a proper regulatory body to oversee the press. The current IPSO is press funded

  18. Alexandria says:

    Daily Fail ruined Harry’s youth and destroyed countless lives. Shut them down! These criminal “journalists” wouldn’t last a day being in his and their shoes!

  19. Harla A Brazen Hussy says:

    I spent all day yesterday wondering why Harry would wear a shirt with a stain on it, only to find out late last night that it was an embroidered bee🙄, why would a designer put that there when it photographs as a stain??

    • UNCDancer says:

      It’s a signifier for only those who have the means to know … a IYKYK sort of thing.

    • BeanieBean says:

      I was going to ask about that!! At first I thought I had gotten something on my computer screen, per usual, and was mad at myself because it’s brand new, then I thought did Harry slopped some mustard on himself? Then I zoomed in & saw it was something embroidered. I need a What Harry Wore website! What a weird place to put your signature embroidery.

    • Ginni says:

      @Harla, l noticed that too! l cleaned my tablet but the stain was still there, now you have an explanation for that. Weird place to embroider a bee if you ask me.

  20. Snoopy says:

    Um, I don’t know. I think the well-endowed comment is kinda gross. If someone said something like that about Meghan’s chest, say, ppl would go nuts. Respect goes both ways. Sorry. And I expect he’d be grossed out if he read it.

    • Gracia says:

      I agree with you, Snoopy. Not really on brand with this site’s usual stance.

    • Rnot says:

      Agreed. That was tacky.

    • Jaded says:

      +1000. I didn’t find that comment appropriate at all.

    • Sportie says:

      @Snoopy Agreed!

    • BQM says:

      There’s also knowing something and KNOWING something. If there wasn’t a difference a lot more cases would be brought for all kinds of crimes.

      Edit—this above comment was supposed to go elsewhere.
      But I’ll add my agreement to those who were discomfited by commenting on Harry’s nether regions.

      • aftershocks says:

        ^^ Acknowledging the truth, apparently is ‘discomfiting,’ for some and hugely comforting 😉 for others, in a “go on wid yo’ badself Haz,” kinda way. IOW, so glad that trusty todger recovered from frostbite! ✌️ 💪 Lots of overjoyed identification with Meg! 🥳🌈

        BTW, Meg’s gorgeous all over too, and she carried her pregnancies so well and stylishly!!! She’s such a role model for healthy living and for not rushing to lose baby weight, but just reveling in the body you have at every stage of life, and letting it take its own time to reach its normal comfort zone after a beautiful life transition, such as pregnancy. 💗

        But for sure, similarly to those who abhor swear words being voiced in public and in private, all due respect to the offended. 🤫 I’ll bet handsome Harry is NOT among the ‘grossed out.’

  21. HamsterJam says:

    Millions of people can now easily recognize H’s bodyguards. Is that good or bad from a bodyguard perspective?

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      I suspect his bodyguards in California are recognizable. I suspect it doesn’t matter. If he had the proper protection when in the UK, people would be able to recognize them, also.

      • aftershocks says:

        ^^ Harry’s bodyguards are switched up periodically, guys. That’s part of what security is all about. Plus, most likely, some of the detail were British police officers assigned to protective courthouse duty.

  22. Virgil says:

    V is for victory! Down with the Daily Fail! C’mon Harry go get em!

  23. QuiteContrary says:

    Harry knows how to wear a suit, that’s for sure.

  24. Well Wisher says:

    “He also referenced ‘vociferous and prolific denials of any wrongdoing’ made by senior executives at Associated Newspapers under oath to the Leveson inquiry.”

    The editor was Paul Darce who is slated for recognition by Boris Johnson.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      This+++++

      Senior executives denied ‘wrongdoing’ but, now, the claimants should have been aware that ANL was participating in ‘wrongdoing’. And, it’s the claimants fault for something, something.

      It sounds like ANL’s defense is the Narcissist’s Prayer.
      https://www.thelifedoctor.org/the-narcissist-s-prayer

      I’ll add. And If I did it, you should have known I would. It’s your fault I’m guilty of wrongdoing and not stopping me.

  25. Well Wisher says:

    It is all about boundaries…..
    It is closing the door on the past….
    The Duke of Sussex is there in person as it
    all unfolds.
    Let justice reign for all , especially Baroness Lawrence.

  26. Cassie says:

    I have a bit of a thing about his main bodyguard ,he just looks so strong and protective .

    I know I am a bit weird but it made me feel Harry was safe ❤