The Mail: ‘Brand Sussex relies on Prince Harry being seen with his family’

The British media’s outright seething and contempt for Joe Biden’s warm Irish embrace is very instructive. The British media has an intertwined political and royal system, in that the same unhinged people screaming about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are now focused on mocking and smearing Irish Joe Biden. Similar tantrums by the very same people, none of whom understand that Americans view their petty grievances quite differently. The billion-dollar hate industry against Meghan and Harry feeds on any kind of news or content about them. But normal people who don’t make their living on racist, jingoist and classist grievance aren’t living and dying on what the Sussexes do next. Americans are happy to let the Sussexes do their own thing in their own time, like every other celebrity. But not according to the Mail’s “Netflix source,” who sounds more like a British reporter with a grudge. This “Netflix insider” claims that everyone in Hollywood just adores King Charles, and that – within Hollywood, mind you – Harry’s decision to attend the coronation is “popular” because Harry is further attaching himself to the winning brand of monarchy. Next up, this Netflix insider will talk about how Biden’s decision to not attend the coronation is very unpopular in America, right?

Harry and Meghan’s commercial status is at a turning point in America, say Hollywood insiders – who warn that the couple’s celebrity status is starting to wilt. Prince Harry’s belated announcement that he is coming to his father’s Coronation next month was warmly welcomed in Los Angeles – not least because the Sussexes’ currency depends on him still being seen as an active member of the Royal Family.

‘Harry is going back for all the right reasons but there was a palpable sigh of relief among those of us involved in the business because Brand Sussex relies on Harry being seen with his family,’ a Netflix source said. ‘At the end of the day it is all about proximity to the King.’

Meanwhile, there is intense speculation in Hollywood about the couple’s next steps and how they will continue to generate the lucrative financial contracts required to fund their lifestyle.

A senior executive at Walt Disney Studios told The MoS: ‘What Harry and Meghan do next is the $64,000 question everyone in Hollywood is asking. They are at a turning point because they’ve done the Netflix series and Harry’s done his book. You could argue the bloom is starting to fade from the rose. What is their currency? Their main selling point is their link to the Royal Family. Harry has to be there [at the Coronation]. In America, this is all part of the narrative. Harry has to go back and he’s either embraced, which is wonderful, or he’s not – which will keep the narrative going. The story has to keep evolving because that is what builds the brand and brings the offers in.’

The executive added: ‘The danger Harry and Meghan face is becoming irrelevant. Americans care about the Royal Family. We’ve always been fascinated by the Royals. Harry is Diana’s son, nothing will ever change that. But the American public needs to see he’s still part of the family because his family and their drama is what we’re interested in.’

[From The Mail]

There’s been a real effort over the past few years to make it sound like everyone in Hollywood is obsessed with the British monarchy and everyone in Hollywood has strong opinions about the Sussexes. None of that is true. At all. While I think Meghan and Harry are well-liked by many celebrities, most people in the Hollywood machinery don’t care about the monarchy OR the Sussexes either way. The British media’s attempts to Britsplain American celebrity culture has always been hilariously off-putting and Brit-centered – they are convinced that the Windsors are the center of every universe (nope) and if the Sussexes aren’t being discussed constantly then “Hollywood hates them.” Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan have enormous cachet in America simply by not being everywhere, not being seen in LA constantly, by looking like they’re two private, family-oriented people. Also: this is a really gross attempt to make it seem like Harry is desperate to be seen with his trash family, when really, his trash family keeps inventing reasons for why Harry and Meghan must visit or “come back.”

Meanwhile, remember during QEII’s funeral, how much of the American news coverage was about how the family was going out of their way to snub the Sussexes and treat them like sh-t? When Americans do pay attention to the royals, it’s with stuff like that.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

75 Responses to “The Mail: ‘Brand Sussex relies on Prince Harry being seen with his family’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. ThatsNotOkay says:

    “Americans care about the Royal Family. We’ve always been fascinated by the Royals.” Says who? Like, two Americans cared about the Royal Family before Diana came around. And once she was killed/murdered, the number went back down again. Then Meghan came and that’s when Americans started paying attention again. And the RF couldn’t handle that little light of hers so they kicked her out. But she’s not going down without a fight. And in fact is rising like a phoenix and setting the RF aflame and Americans love fireworks. THAT’s what’s happening here.

    Now, yes, if the fireworks between the Sussexes and the RF end, the Sussexes have our interest now, so it’s time to fine-tune their brand and launch something new and huge so that their association with the RF is not what we look to them for. Not that Invictus and Archwell aren’t triumphs in their own right. But they need that one new thing NOW that says, Bye, Felicia, forever.

  2. Acha says:

    I actually really dug Biden’s energy during his Ireland trip. He loved them, they loved him. It was a total love-fest, and the Dropkick Murphys playing him out onto stage was [chef’s kiss]. It’s a shame that the other island doesn’t love positivity and joy.

    Sometimes I wonder whether England is a stew of smart, bitchy, privileged people with absolutely nowhere to go and nothing to do, so they just pick at each other and any grievance they can find.

  3. bitsycs says:

    Whoever wrote this also doesn’t seem to understand production deals, because the made up disney source quote doesn’t really make sense with what we know about Netflix and Spotify. The deal with Netflix clearly has multiple projects they work on and produce. I’m pretty sure a Disney insider understands how those deals work which makes the quote an obvious lie. They had something come out at Netflix right after their personal doc series.

    • MsIam says:

      Like why would anyone at Disney care or be commenting on someone who works for their competitor? Whatever the Sussexes do next, it won’t make Disney any money.

    • TigerMcQueen says:

      I suspect that “senior executive” is some fellow rota rat who watched a couple of Disney movies.

      • ML says:

        Ah, I figured the “senior executive” and the “Netflix source” work(ed) with and/or for TMZ. Rupert Murdoch connections.

      • Concern Fae says:

        My guess is aristo adjacent Brit working in their PR/comms department.

        Or executive washroom attendant.

        These people really don’t realize that American interest in royalty is in two divisions, minivan majority moms who grew up on Princess movies who like white supremacy played out in pretty pictures of smiling royal wives. The larger portion is there for the snarky soap opera gossip of it all.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      Or the Mail reporter just pulled this whole thing out of his/her ass.

      • BeanieBean says:

        Ding ding ding, we have a winner!

      • Mary Pester says:

        @brassyrebel, for the first time ever I have to disagree with you. The reporter did get a quote from Disney, he had a long conversation with Mickie mouse over a couple of gallons of wine and a half pound of cheese! Yep, that’s how much I believe this crap. What the hell has Hollywood got to do with Harry and Megan?and Disney sure hasn’t Megan and Harry are living the American dream, earning a living, raising their children in a beautiful home. Meanwhile the cobwebs are gathering over the Royal family. Rages and wiglets notwithstanding there is dwindling power in the monarchy, and I honestly believe Americans would rather have a couple that work, than a family that sponges of the tax payer for their wealth

  4. MsIam says:

    Yeah, I read a lot comments that said people were upset with Harry for wanting to be around his trash family for a two hour ceremony. So I don’t think he’s dependent on them for any “shine”. What’s with right-wing media and their tendency to create these alternate realities? Next they will say that Harry needs to ” embrace” Rottwilla because she’s “popular”.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      Speaking as an American, I would prefer that the Sussexes never go near Harry’s trashy family again.

  5. Brit says:

    They really can’t accept the fact that Meghan isn’t coming and probably won’t come for a long time. I swear Meghan and Harry have these tabloids and obsessed loons malfunctioning. They never go for the simple explanation and just go with wild conspiracies. I get a sense that people over there know this is the end of the road for clicks, views and money because the Sussexes won’t be making that many appearances, especially Meghan in the near future.

  6. Jais says:

    This sounds like a royal reporter’s pov. Really think this is made up and not from Netflix at all. Maaaybe a royalist Brit working at Netflix? I don’t know but it’s not reality bc having proximity to Charles is not really that glamorous.

    • BeanieBean says:

      They don’t seem to realize that most Americans either don’t think about Charles at all or really don’t like Charles. It’s not proximity to the king for which people have an interest in Harry (if they do), it’s proximity to Diana. He’s her son. People loved her, hated what Charles & Camilla did to her, hated what the press did to her.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        BeanieBean, that’s exactly what I thought when I read this diatribe. Yes, a lot of Americans want to see Harry succeed because of Princess Di. They don’t like KFC and they never will.

  7. Jan says:

    This reminds me of one of tabloid writer saying, people are going to be sleeping on the streets of Boston to see the Wailes, as though they were waiting for concert or a major sports event tickets. I’ll even throw in the latest version of an iPhone.
    What the tabloids don’t understand, in the US if you work hard and earn your money, most Americans mind their business and don’t care.
    I have noticed that anyone that works with the Sussexes, the Windsor Mafia tries to bring into fold, there are not satisfied copying everything the Sussexes do.
    Meghan, even have them hugging people now.
    So yes, the Sussexes need the BRF, LOL.

  8. Snuffles says:

    “‘At the end of the day it is all about proximity to the King.’”

    First of all, not true, the US is largely apathetic towards the royals, with a few exceptions (Diana, Harry and Meghan). But it’s clear that the UK press believe this DEEPLY. Because the second someone doesn’t fawn over and try to kiss the King’s ass or other royals, they throw a MASSIVE temper tantrum (see, BIDEN). They truly believe they are the center of the universe and the pinnacle of being. And when anyone rejects that notion they lose their ever loving minds and try to destroy them (see, the SUSSEXES).

    “if the Sussexes aren’t being discussed constantly then “Hollywood hates them.”

    Also not true, but, again, they genuinely believe this because that’s what it’s like for the royals. If they aren’t being talked about on a daily basis, they fear irrelevancy and if the people stop believing in their importance, the whole concept of monarchy falls apart.

    So they don’t get that your average celebrity tends to lay low between projects. Which is exactly how Harry and Meghan behave. They are out of sight until they have something to promote.

    • MsIam says:

      Agree. I think the fastest way to become “unpopular” as a celebrity is for people to see your face every time they turn around.

  9. Miranda says:

    Yes, everyone in Hollywood loves King Charles! In fact, the reason he can’t get anyone to perform at his dumbass Chubbly concert is because all the best celebrities were actually trampled to death in the mad rush to sign up. 😒😒

    • ML says:

      Thank you, Miranda! You explained this so well.:)

      • kirk says:

        I couldn’t figure out why Katy Perry is performing, but then I read she and Lionel Richie are involved with Prince’s Trust.

        Noticed local PBS station was running Willy’s Boston Earthspit concert late the other night. What a disjointed thing that was with random celebrities present, but satellite links to winners. Weird.

  10. Well as Biden would say that is a load of malarkey. They need Harry because he brings the spotlight not the other way around. That is why the are so desperate to have him at the chubbly.

    • aftershocks says:

      ^^ Exactly! All that these desperate rota clout-chasers are doing, is projecting. It’s always opposite day on Salty Isle. They ain’t worried about the Sussexes’ bottom line and ‘funding sources.’ They are worried about their own meal tickets! Yep, the irrelevant ones residing in Montecito whom they have no control over, yet are obsessed with, are the ‘meak tickets’ that got away. The BM and the rota have no access. They have run out of relevant Sussex fodder, yet that doesn’t stop them from writing hundreds of nonsensical articles a day about H&M. The BM/ rota/ palace leakers are the ones creating unnecessary drama!

      As we know, Harry will always be royal. He can’t escape who he is. But that’s not his brand. The Sussexes’ brand is hard work, fresh ideas, service to others, and an in-born charisma, kindness, authenticity and classiness that Diana also possessed. The ‘royalty,’ aspect is a burden that Harry learned to accept and to use on his own terms, as a platform to help others. The Sussexes will never be irrelevant. All they are seeking is peace, safety and security in which to nurture their children and live their lives to the fullest.

  11. NJGR says:

    “Senior executive at Walt Disney”? Who said “the bloom is starting to fade from the rose”? Pretty sure this is entirely made up by a journalist in London who’s never even stepped foot on US soil.

    • UnstrungPearl says:

      Isn’t it funny, every ‘source’ quoted by the rota speaks in exactly the same way…

    • Boxy Lady says:

      That thing about the bloom fading from the rose caught my eye as well. It’s not a regular American phrase. I mean, I’m sure some born-and-raised Americans say it but I haven’t heard it regularly. Maybe it’s more of a “privileged” person’s saying.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Boxy Lady, well, it might be said for a fading beauty? I think that’s the way I’ve heard it used–infrequently. It really isn’t a thing here.

  12. Noor says:

    People want to read what happen to the missing $80 million royal jewellery. They don’t want to read what the hollywood anonymous sources, or the butler, or the dress designer, say about Harry and Meghan

  13. Amy Bee says:

    Why is a Disney executive commenting on Harry and Meghan? Weird. I agree with Kaiser this is a British reporter posing as a Hollywood source. Plus weren’t they saying last week that Meghan needed to be at the coronation to save their brand? What’s changed? Another thing the source inadvertently points out that Harry has more cache in the US being Diana’s son rather than a member of the Royal Family.

    • Brit says:

      Meghan embarrassed and ripped apart the narrative that she was coming just for association from the royals. They were clearly expecting her to come and her not made them go back to the drawing board for narratives. Meghan is done and if she wanted to come for “clout” because as they say, this was a important moment is history, she would’ve been there all things considered. A big of the reason they attack Meghan is because they can’t control her.

  14. JCallas says:

    Charles couldn’t get any A list celebrities to perform for him. There was an entire article written about how the BRF is toxic.

  15. Maxine Branch says:

    The gutter press in the UK will never forgive Meghan for denying them those money shots by not coming to that coronation. Harry will be there out of decency for Charles coronation, nothing more, (a quick in and out), blink and you will miss him. Smart strategy from this couple re you tend to your father, I am good at home with our kids. The few and far between visits from the Sussexes re their patronages other than death is all they will get from them. The Sussexes have moved on, They had their say and most importantly Harry has written his book for history. Pretty sure future projects will not include references re that institution. Seems pretty hard for those folks to accept they are in the rear view mirror now. They are pissing all over themselves to be associated with any success of the Sussexes and creating all sorts of noise to claim the Sussexes need that association, when we all know it is the other way around. Jill Biden is pretty sharp and she is aware of how Harry has been treated.

    • Brit says:

      This is the tantrums and cries of a media who knows this is the end of the road. They backed the wrong horse and are left with the boring, pale and stale. They know it will be years before Meghan is on UK soil again. Meghan will probably be seen in a photo and in capacity of royalty again besides her husband. She only respected the Queen. There’s not point in keeping pretenses anymore. She gave everyone what they wanted and they can’t take the rejection.

  16. Tessa says:

    Of course Chuck is not blamed for things like evicting them from frogmore.

  17. GlamShady says:

    I work in film and TV (art department), and these “quotes” from supposed sources made me ⚰️💀
    NOBODY from Netflix or Disney is running to British tabloids with these bizarre takes. And literally nobody in Hollywood gives a fuck about the royal family.

    Side note: Ive crewed with people who worked on shows with Meghan in the past. They have nothing but the absolute best things to say about her. As many here have already noted, it’s the royals who need her, not the other way around

    • Brit says:

      Like? As we saw with Earthflop in the states and not one modern day popular entertainer wanted to perform at the coronation. These people are loons.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      GlamShady, doesn’t it make you wonder why they chose to make these quotes from these particular people? Are they hoping for these entities to put out statements? Are they so thirsty for engagement from the Sussexes that they are willing to take it third hand? This entire article is freaky.

      • aftershocks says:

        ^^ Yep @Saucy&Sassy. My take is that some of this claptrap is written to provoke. Then the rota and palace insiders come to CB to read what we Sussex supporters have to say. They scout for reactions and takes that they can turn around and twist to create more faux drama, in their ongoing effort to generate revenue clicks. 🙄

  18. Sunshine says:

    Given that this is the U.K., I’m reading this in opposites. Translation:
    Given that Meghan’s has deprived Chuck of his grandfather pictures, he desperately needs a picture for headlines and so that he can pretend to be a loving father.

  19. “‘At the end of the day it is all about proximity to the King.” I don’t think this is true in the US. Not everyone, especially Hollywood, feels honored to be next to Charles. Ask Meghan.

    William who is the future king did not even garner enough interest for his Earthshot in Boston. Nobody in America was interested enough to be near the future king and his hunched queen. Thus William’s event was a certified flop.

    One poster upthread is correct. The Royal family brand is on a downward trend. And they know this; the British media know this and the world knows this. They’ve been exposed as racist and plunderers. That’s why they insist on hitching their wagon to the right horse with a successful brand : the Sussex brand. They need Harry and Meghan to boost their sagging popularity.

    • Well Wisher says:

      That is the view in the UK as it should, him being the un-elected and impartial Head of State. No so in the US as you mentioned, the decline begun as soon as the Royal Family can be reduced to tangible and measured by cash. a 1, 000+ year entity has no right associating itself in terms of ‘branding’, a trend that will be soon be replaced by some other marketing term in the near future.
      Its relativity and significance has evolved beyond the whims of a replaceable market place.

  20. Lizzie says:

    Just check the cover of best seller Spare. Just Harry.

    • MsIam says:

      Spare? Nobody bought that book at all! Lol, these people. They need Harry and Meghan desperately, otherwise they can’t get out of their own way.

  21. ❌❌❌Tart ❌❌❌ says:

    Here’s some news. Piers Morgan has been given another show on CNN. Coming here to attack the Sussexes in the US.

    • MsIam says:

      Yeah CNN has jumped the shark for sure. Because there are just not enough right wing nutcases on the airwaves already. /s

    • Brit says:

      That show will tank like it did before. That man is determined to get near them. He wants acknowledgement so badly. I’m not surprised and cnn will lose more viewers than ever before. He will lead the charge but he probably won’t because the US won’t be here for the obsessive staking. He’ll tread lightly at first.

    • Chantal says:

      CNN really is desperate. PM was a fiasco the last time he worked here. They will soon learn being Fox lite won’t cut it, esp if they’re still planning to have a primetime show featuring Charles Barkley and Gayle King. CNN isn’t ready for the real racists – guests nor commenters. Talk about “swimming with sharks”. Hope they have their lawyers on standby bc with PM, a lawsuit is inevitable. Hope Meghan gets a restraining order for this fool to stop stalking her.

    • kirk says:

      What show on CNN has been given to Piers? And why would CNN offer him anything when he joined the Rupert network after walking out on Good Morning Britain? Back in 2014 when CNN pulled him from the air for lousy ratings – Piers managed to deliver the 6th lowest primetime ratings ever to CNN on Feb 18, 2014. They axed him a few days later. If you want to see ‘Piers Morgan Uncensored’ tv show, I believe it’s on cable Fox Nation in US.

    • Well Wisher says:

      CNN new owner is very much to the right, he has moved the company in that direction, It may evolve into another Fox News.

  22. SussexWatcher says:

    It’s completely the opposite! Harry is the only royal that anyone cares about (including Brits). He and Meghan brought glamour, charisma, and obvious empathy and caring to/about the people and causes they worked with. And they are the ONLY ones in the current family who do. Every single article about any other royal contains some reference to Meghan because she’s the one who gets clicks and makes bank for the press.

    King Chuckles and his mistress queen get booed and egged everywhere they go. Peggington and Keen are boring, bored charisma vacuums who obviously don’t care about their royal work, such as it is. No one cares about them.

    So it’s more that the royal family needs Harry to be seen with THEM! To be seen as having forgiven them, to lend them some of his sparkle and international appeal so that they don’t look like the completely racist, grifting dinosaurs that they actually are.

    • aftershocks says:

      ^^ Yes, this is it @Sussexwatcher! 🎯 💯
      The truth is always the opposite of the lies and the fictitious narratives spewed by the BM/ rota.

      Harry already told us that as far as his royal relatives, he’s only “interested in having a family, not an institution.” As usual, the rota and palace courtiers try to twist his words and refuse to pay heed to the writing on the wall, much less to the strong, revealing writing in Harry’s book.

  23. PrincessOfWaffles says:

    I think The Mail brand relies on Harry and Meghan to be seen, ideally with clowns

  24. Nerd says:

    I think their Netflix source is someone in the Royal Rota who has a Netflix account and is friends with King Camilla and Queen Chucky. Anyone who is legit connected to Netflix wouldn’t jeopardize the contract they already have in place with the Sussexes and would know that that contract involves more than just their Harry and Meghan docuseries. They released the Live to Lead docuseries after their own docuseries about them, with what seems like potentially another installment of that series in the future, which would be great because it really was a great series that was very informative and uplifting about some people well known and some who weren’t. They also have the Invictus documentary coming out later this year, so their connection to Netflix goes well beyond their connection to the royal family. Their Spotify deal had no connection to the RF at all, and like their Netflix work, was extremely successful. Award winning work with Spotify which hopefully will lead to another season of podcasts. The person who wrote this article failed to mention that their contracts happened in 2020 at a time when they had stepped down completely from being working royals and their relationship with them was obviously strained and unlikely to improve, so obviously their proximity to the king is irrelevant. Regarding the lie that Americans are so obsessed with the royals and Queen Chucky, the fact is that Harry has always been the most or second most popular royal. So much so that he was the one who was usually sent to and even requested for to travel to commonwealth countries. The crowds to see Harry, before and even more so since Meghan, have always shown his and her popularity is more than any of the other royals. In three years Harry and Meghan have only been seen with the other royals a handful of times and still have managed to remain the most talked about royals. There isn’t an article about any of the other royals that doesn’t mention Harry and Meghan to help increase clicks. Jabba just put out a book out of nowhere just to counter everything Harry said in a book he just released three months ago. The fascination is obviously with Harry and Meghan and not the others on that island.

  25. Lauren says:

    Look, do Americans tend to find royalty interesting? Yes, we don’t have royalty here so their is a certain interest in meeting royals from other countries. But it has nothing to do with how close someone is to a monarch.
    Harry is a prince, was born a prince, being seen with Charles doesn’t increase the level of interest derived by his royal status.

    • kirk says:

      As a Meghan fan from watching Suits, my interest in BRF began with her.

      As a Meghan fan, my disgust and horror at BRFCo atrocities began with her. Unlike idiots who are satisfied with a whitewashed education on BRFCo, I’ve read up a bit more.

    • Well Wisher says:

      Less than one-third of Americans are interested in the monarchy. That is how it is .

  26. C says:

    I think these people are going to be very surprised at how few people tune in or will actually care about the Coronation – and I think they will be surprised that the people who don’t care aren’t just Harry and Meghan fans.

    So we’ll have to see what they say after it.

  27. Izzy says:

    “The Royal Family’s continued relevance and existence relies upon them being adjacent to the Team Sussex brand.”

    There, I fixed it for them.

  28. QuiteContrary says:

    Harry and Meghan’s “lifestyle” could be funded by the proceeds from “Spare” alone. They’ll be fine. Better than fine, as they deserve.

    • aftershocks says:

      ^^ Yep, exactly. M&H are always working. They’ve got projects underway and in the pipeline. We just don’t know anything until they are ready to launch! 🚀 🎆

      There are no leaks in Montecito. 😍

      Meanwhile, M&H will be continuing to receive awards for the work they’ve already produced. 🌟

  29. Jaded says:

    *Hollywood* doesn’t care, and it’s patently obvious that some British tabloid bottom-feeder came up with this nonsense after drinking 8 pints. The constant reference to *Hollywood* as an entity the Sussexes are courting is nonsense, but in this uneducated tabloid idiot’s mind Hollywood’s approval is everything the Sussexes crave. The very obvious good work Harry and Meghan are doing (successfully) with Netflix, Spotify, Archewell, Harry’s book and their philanthropic work has absolutely nothing to do with Hollywood moguls, movers or shakers. The awards they’ve received and are about to receive have nothing to do with power-alliances with the “star-making machinery” (thanks to Joni Mitchell for that), just Meghan and Harry’s determined work to make the world a better place.

    • aftershocks says:

      Here, here @Jaded! 💯 ❤️‍🔥 Preach!

      “… some British tabloid bottom-feeder came up with this nonsense after drinking 8 pints.”

      🎯 🤣🤣😂😆🤭 🤜🤛 🥂

  30. Beverley says:

    Absurd how the British press regards “Hollywood” as a monolith. It’s almost funny how very little the RRs know about American culture. Kaiser was right, the Brit-splain is comical and beyond pathetic.

  31. HeyKay says:

    H&M have charity and foundation work to help and support others. They don’t need to publicly align themselves w/BRF. They are doing their own work.
    They’re not Kardashians selling makeup and plastic surgery.

    JMO, H&M are now a separate item, doing their own work as private citizens.
    Their “brand” if any, is showing how to live your life according to your own standards/morals.
    They gained respect by leaving the BRF and shinning a light on the ugliness inside the Crown.

    The Monarchy is on it’s way out!

  32. bisynaptic says:

    LOL they really still see the United States as another British colony, don’t they.

    • bisynaptic says:

      “In America, this is all part of the narrative. Harry has to go back and he’s either embraced, which is wonderful, or he’s not – which will keep the narrative going. The story has to keep evolving because that is what builds the brand and brings the offers in.’”
      —they’re also (inadvertently?) describing their own business model.