Royalist: Will the identity of the Windsors’ ‘royal racist’ ever be revealed?

On Friday, the Telegraph dropped their exclusive report about the letters exchanged by then-Prince Charles and the Duchess of Sussex. These letters were exchanged following the Oprah interview in 2021, so I would say Charles probably wrote to Meghan in May or June of that year, and she likely wrote back promptly. No one heard anything about these letters until “someone” leaked their existence and some partial content to the Telegraph last week. Meghan didn’t mention the letters in any of her interviews or the Netflix series or anywhere else. So it was hilariously stupid when all of the royal reporters began parroting the same line late Friday, that Meghan had “leaked” the letters to the Telegraph. That talking point was quickly refuted by Meghan, via her spokesperson.

The whole “who leaked the existence of the letters” kerfuffle overshadowed the real story, which is that Meghan and Charles both named the “royal racist,” the senior royal figure who told Harry he shouldn’t marry Meghan because their baby’s skin would be too dark. After the Windsors hung their hats on “recollections may vary” for years, it turns out that everyone’s recollections were exactly the same, and people within the family know exactly who said what to whom. The distraction has a purpose – the palace leaked the letters’ existence as a way to clear Charles of the “royal racism” charge ahead of his coronation. The intention was never to examine or identify the culprit(s). Which is why there has been precious little follow-up reporting – everyone in Windsor World knows who said racist sh-t, and I suspect the royal reporters know as well. But they expect Meghan and Harry to do their dirty work and they’re mad as hell that the Sussexes are taking a longer view. Speaking of, the Daily Beast’s Royalist had one of the few follow-ups on the Telegraph’s original report. After giving a (biased) accounting of what has happened thus far in the racism saga, Tom Sykes reported this:

The issue has, of course, continued to simmer away in the background, although most would argue the royals have successfully moved on. As a friend of the king’s told The Daily Beast: “The queen tried to just keep calm and carry on, and Charles is taking the same approach.”

The Sussex camp has denied suggestions that they leaked the information [to the Telegraph], and Buckingham Palace has declined to comment on the matter. What seems likely, however, is that an increasingly large number of people now know exactly who it was that Meghan and Harry allege had “conversations” with them about the likely color of her unborn child’s skin. This in turn increases the likelihood that, eventually, the person who made the remark will be identified.

Intriguingly, the Telegraph went so far as to identify them as a “senior” member of the family, an assertion which remains in the published piece. Shortly after the allegation was first made a Buckingham Palace insider furiously upbraided this reporter in an off-the-record conversation for suggesting the person who made the comment was a “senior” member of the family, as had been suggested to us by several sources.

Buckingham Palace declined to respond to a request for comment by The Daily Beast, but the notion that it was a “senior” figure who made the comment seems to be becoming an accepted part of the narrative. So who could it be? Well, at some point over the past few years, every leading member of the family has been named to this reporter, in private conversations, and journalistic gossip, as the royal family’s skin tone inquisitor.

Prince Charles, as he then was, was one of the very first to be publicly named, by the writer Christopher Andersen, who said that Charles made a comment musing on their children’s likely skin color while he was having breakfast with his wife, Camilla, in front of footmen and other domestic servants. Of course this doesn’t quite mesh with Meghan’s claim that “there were several conversations about it” but then Meghan’s version of events—which says that the conversations were had with Harry who then relayed them to her—conflict with Harry’s account of who spoke to him and when.

Camilla has frequently been bandied about as a possible suspect, although friends of the queen have told The Daily Beast that they think she would be highly unlikely to have made such a comment. “It’s unthinkable,” one friend told The Daily Beast.

Princess Anne, who is widely rumored to have been no great fan of the marriage in the first place, has also been mentioned as a suspect. In large part, however, this seems to be based on her reputation for blunt speaking, and her perceived overall coolness towards Meghan, rather than any specific knowledge of something she may or may not have said.

William, of course has, has also come under suspicion in this messy game of Clue. In recent months speculation has intensified because of the extreme way in which he was attacked in Harry’s book, Spare, which did not repeat or clarify the allegation made to Oprah. We do know that he advised Harry to pause and reflect before marrying Meghan, warning him against rushing into marrying somebody that the family didn’t know.

Of course, William is the only member of the family to have specifically reacted to the allegations, telling a crowd of reporters shortly after the interview aired, “We are very much not a racist family.” And that pretty much sums up the attitude from friends of William who say he would never have made such a remark. It is all a refinement, if you like, of “recollections may vary.”

[From The Daily Beast]

Here’s the thing – the letters’ existence and the fact that Charles was the only one in the family to write to Meghan show that Charles was not the one saying sh-t about how dark the baby’s skin would be. Charles wouldn’t write to Meghan and bitch her out for revealing something that he said. I mean, maybe he would, but it seems far more likely that Charles would only write the letter if he wasn’t the main culprit AND he knew the identity of the culprit. Anyway, how do I say this? Most of us pegged out the identity of the royal racist long ago.

Note by Celebitchy: Sign up for our mailing list and get the Top 8 stories about the Royal Racist! I only send one email a day on weekdays around lunchtime.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

105 Responses to “Royalist: Will the identity of the Windsors’ ‘royal racist’ ever be revealed?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Brit says:

    The press know exactly who said it and they’ve been trying to quietly expose William and his behavior for years now and you can tell they want too. That letter “leak” was a warning to William to step up and stop your tantrums/ leaks and with the recent Kate articles that make her look bad, that was a warning to her too. Charles was quietly saying out loud, I’m not the one who said it but there is written proof of who did. William better dial it back a bit because I’m getting the sense that his father and the tabloids are about to turn on him and Kate.

    • Dot Gingell says:

      100% agree Brit. The warm gentle winds W&K have been basking are certainly turning a lot cooler.

    • KFG says:

      This is Murdoch and the rota getting mad bc they still have no info on the sussexes and Harry isn’t dropping the lawsuit. If Will can’t get dirt on H&M then they will get their pound of flesh somehow.

    • ThatsNotOkay says:

      Everyone has been warning William by leaking about William and he just doesn’t get it. He has no alliances because he’s burned every bridge. And he’s about to get his comeuppance and everything he deserves.

    • Acha says:

      Lmao. “Pegged.” I see what you did there, Kaiser.

  2. The Hench says:

    I’ve long had the Royal Racist pegged as William. But now I wonder would Charles, Father-of-the-Year, bother to write to Meghan to defend Wills? Seems unlikely. But I think he WOULD write to defend Camilla….

    • Jais says:

      Interesting theory. I too have always thought it was William. But yeah, couldn’t necessarily see Charles writing a letter in William’s defense. Unless it was just an overall defense about the monarchy being now seen as racist.

    • Becks1 says:

      I think it was William. I kind of wonder at this point if it was Kate, but I’m still pretty sure it was william.

      I don’t think this letter from Charles was about defending William so much as sort of trying to connect with Meghan and (maybe) hope he could walk a line between understanding and defending in an attempt to keep her from naming William.

      Remember Meghan said it would be very damaging to them. if something is damaging to william, its damaging to the monarchy, and Charles WOULD try to protect that.

      • notasugarhere says:

        I think it was both W&K at different times. William directly to Harry, Kate directly to/at Meghan without Harry being present.

        What is interesting? Notice Kate is the only ‘senior royal’ who isn’t even addressed here? Is that their way of saying it WAS Kate, or the tabloids way of hinting they know she doesn’t matter because she’s on the way out?

      • Millennial says:

        I think if it were Kate they would have thrown her under the bus long ago. To me it’s obviously William, and I think the level of unforgiving rage William had shown coupled with “never being able to trust” Harry again confirms it.

      • Becks1 says:

        @Nota I do think it is interesting Kate is not mentioned here. I don’t think Sykes is particularly invested in protecting Kate (even if he does hate Meghan) so i think if it was her that made “the” comment to Harry, we would at least see her name in the discussion. do I think Kate probably made various racist remarks at different points? Absolutely, but I think this was William.

        But like I said the lack of mention of her is interesting. They talk about other senior royals but not her. Is she not going to be a senior royal much longer? 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

    • Sunday says:

      I agree that it was William who made The Comment to Harry (though everyone in that family is racist and has undoubtedly said disgusting things about Meghan and the children at one time or another).

      I don’t think Charles wrote to Meghan to defend Will, though. Quite the opposite. By declining to explicitly name the royal racist due to how damaging it would be, H & M opened the senior royals up to press speculation about exactly who it was (it’s what they deserve, honestly, and also as I said they are all racist, it’s not just one rotten apple here). So, I think Charles wrote to Meghan to implore her to clear HIS name (and Camilla’s).

      These people don’t have the foresight to worry about future damage to the monarchy; everything they’ve done since 2017 has irrevocably damaged the monarchy. I think Charles was hoping for Meghan and Harry to extend their “it definitely wasn’t the Queen or Prince Philip” disclaimer to include him and Camilla also, regardless of how it would impact the other royals or the monarchy as a whole.

      • Becks1 says:

        @Sunday I bet that’s exactly right. Harry came out after the interview and told oprah it wasnt his grandmother or grandfather. Charles probably wanted a similar statement saying it wasn’t him.

      • Christine says:

        I think you’ve hit the nail on the head, Sunday. Chuck would absolutely beg for public exoneration from Meghan, even though the only remaining “senior royal” who would be very damaged is Willnot.

    • Hannah says:

      The only reason I think it was Camilla is because I truly believe C3 does not GAF about anyone besides himself and his bit on the side. He’s proven that he is only too happy to throw both his children under the bus – to protect Camilla. He’s washed his hands of both his children. Camilla and his public image/reputation are ALL he cares about

      • Ciotog says:

        Didn’t we already hear that Camilla made a “joke” about Archie having a ginger Afro?

      • Becks1 says:

        See I generally agree with that about Charles and Camilla, except that Meghan said it would be very damaging. Camilla is older, known for being kind of….snarky, I guess, or having a dry sense of humor or whatever term people are using, and even at the height of her rehabilitation she was not that beloved across the board. Would something like this be “very damaging” for Camilla? It would be easy to play it off as different generation, Camilla’s always making inappropriate comments, no one likes her anyway, etc.

        That’s what leads me back to William.

        ETA and to add – I think they all had “concerns” for the most part as yes, they are very much a racist family. But I think William was the person who had “the” conversation with Harry.

      • Christine says:

        Becks is so polite. Cam is a giant bag of penises, the world finding out she is also a flaming racist wouldn’t affect her life AT ALL.

        Wills on the other hand….

    • ThatsNotOkay says:

      I think Camilla wondered, but William ran with it and made it a concern. Charles wrote because he thought she meant Camilla, but Meghan was like, nah, William made it an issue. We all wonder what our kids will look like, but only a royal racist wonders if it will ruin his reputation if the child is slightly cafe au lait.

  3. RainbowBrite says:

    Hm. They’re all racist. My moneys always been on Will having made the specific comments. But it’s weird they don’t even mention Kate as a potential culprit in the article…. I have no doubt she had horribly racist things to say as well. Almost seems intentional? Like a leak from camp Middleton?

    • Sam says:

      No I think it’s straight from BP. But I do believe Kate could have said it as well. Or even said that it with Willi!

      • K-Peace says:

        I’m pretty sure the Royal Racist who made those remarks isn’t Kate, based on how Meghan stated in the Oprah interview that Kate is “a good person”. I personally think we can cross her name off the list of possibilities.

        It’s so very obvious it’s William, IMO. Everything points to him.

      • notasugarhere says:

        They made clear there was more than one member of the family who made comments. To me that is W&K. We’ve seen Kate’s openly racist responses and words *on the job* for over a decade.

        As her friend Serena Williams said, ‘Meghan is too nice’. Meghan was also trying to diffuse the derangers with her comments about ‘you don’t have to like one and hate the other’ type of comment.

        And as we’ve seen, Meghan and Harry are making enormous allowances for these people, extending them greater kindness than the rest of us would. In other words, Kate is racist, Meghan knows it but she’s trying to make allowances and not make waves.

    • Amy Bee says:

      No, this is BP’s handiwork. If it were the Middleton’s they would have not leaked it to the DM.

    • notasugarhere says:

      I should have read down further. It is *suspicious* Kate isn’t mentioned at all. Middleton leak, or everyone knows she’s on the way out so what she says/said doesn’t matter.

  4. Emmlo says:

    I knew when Meghan said it would be very damaging to them if she named them. It’s neither surprising nor damaging when someone in their 70s says something out of touch and ignorant. If someone in their early 40s did so, however…

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Especially if that someone has made public noise about how racism is unacceptable (in football).

  5. Izzy says:

    “ Most of us pegged out the identity of the royal racist long ago.”

    I’M SCREAMING 😂💀😂💀

    Let’s be honest: the only ways that name will be revealed is if 1) they say something so stupid that they out themselves as the racist, 2) someone in the RF leaks their identity, or 3) the Rota Rats decide to jump off the sinking ship and reveal what they know.

    • SarahCS says:

      Honestly, all three of those options seem plausible given the utter idiocy we see daily around the BRF and how the rota are figuring out life in the post-Liz world. They will go where the £££ are.

  6. A says:

    Lol. Pegged it. I love it.

    The neat (terrible) thing is, it’s all of them. They all v e r y clearly grew up with racist (and otherwise bigoted) ideas and misconceptions that were never once challenged until approximately 2016. And they, like hornets after their nest has been disturbed, have been angrily buzzing around trying to beat back that challenge ever since.

  7. Flowerlake says:

    WILL he ever be revealed? I AM not sure.

    • Cj says:

      I see what you did there. And I tip my hat to you.

    • He reveals himself all the time. We don’t have to wonder.

    • Becks1 says:

      🤣🤣🤣

    • lanne says:

      The question should be, who ISNT a royal racist? POCs are just stage props to them. Who would say the thing out loud? My guess would be Camilla–that sounds like someone a married-in who thinks highly of herself, and who feels secure in her position–would say out loud. But it also sounds like something a rage monster with no filter would say, aka William. William has never had a POC friend of any kind. He has never spent any time with POCs that wasn’t connected to duty. Heck, he has no friends who aren’t aristos. I think all of the folks in the aristo class would say something like this without thought. Most of the aristos/royals in the 1930s were open fascist supporters after all. They might be more quiet about it now, but Meghan’s experiences have shown that their racial attitudes haven’t changed a bit.

      • Becks1 says:

        One of the reasons I am so sure it was william is because of Meghan’s line about “what that would look like” or something. William didn’t want his white kids photographed next to nonwhite children on that damn balcony for the rest of their lives, or seen together at christmas, etc.

        I think Charles’ problems with Meghan stemmed from her popularity and just Harry getting married in general and having to pay (supposedly) for her etc. and then escalated from there.

        I think William’s problems were racist and xenophobic from the start.

      • windyriver says:

        As Meghan’s spokesperson pointed out, this whole thing was past history. If the person is Camilla, that’s absolutely a reason Charles would NOT want to revive the issue, especially since no one was publicly aware the letter exchange between Charles and Meghan existed in the first place. I do believe it was BP that got the ball rolling again, for whatever reason (it seems like a stupid move to me, but what else is new). And I like the theory that Charles may have written to Meghan in the first place to be sure she wasn’t referring to him (or Cammy) and hoping the Sussexes would make a statement that the person referred to wasn’t Charles either, similar to what they did re: TQ and Philip.

        As far as KP being involved in the release of the contents of the letter, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if Will and KP actually knew nothing at all about the existence of the letters, that it was Charles’ little secret.

    • Lorelei says:

      LMFAO!

      It grates so much whenever “The Royal Racist” is discussed because ALL OF THEM are racist, ffs. (Maybe not Eugenie, but everyone else.)

    • Kittenmom says:

      🤭

  8. TRH says:

    How does one send a physical letter to Charles and ensure that he gets it? Didn’t she learn about not sending letters from her own father!

    • Eurydice says:

      Good question. I think Charles would receive the letter, but it would have been read and copied first by one or more of his minions. With the way that place leaks I wouldn’t be surprised if the letters have been in the tabloids’ hands for all this time.

  9. Amie says:

    I think the British press already know who it is and one day we’ll get it confirmed. By how hard the press has attacked HM over it, I think it’s either Kate or William. They’re the ones who would have damage done to their reputations.

    But I think all of them most likely said something.

    • brit says:

      And they want Harry and Meghan to say it because they still want access without getting their hands dirty and messing up the invisible contract. A lot of the anger towards the Sussexes is because a lot of them want the lid completely blown off but the reporters are compromised and are too cowardly to leak it themselves.

      • Amie says:

        Yes, Brit, I think the press wants Harry or Meghan or someone else to come out and say it is William or Kate. The press can’t or won’t because of whatever their agreement is with the Royals. But one day it’ll come out and we’ll find out that the shirt time Meghan was in the RF, it was a lot uglier than we know.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      I do not think it was Kate who made the nasty racist remark.

      • lanne says:

        Me neither. She likely thinks it, but I don’t think she would say it out loud in the presence of others. My guess is she’s a complete mouse in view of other royals and aristos, and doesn’t say more than “yes dear.” There’s the fear of doing something that could be viewed as too “middle class” and getting criticized for it.

      • notasugarhere says:

        I think Kate would have said it. She is that racist, stupid, selfish, and entitled. This is completely up her alley of offensive, mindless comments.

      • Jaded says:

        Me neither BTB. Her animosity towards Meghan comes from a place of jealousy because she’s so much more than Khate could ever be, and she can’t be unaware that Willnot was very attracted to her. The video of him looking Meghan up and down at the wedding like she’s a piece of meat is actually quite disturbing. Of course she would whole-heartedly agree with Willnot’s comment and back him up because of her overwhelming hatred of Meghan, but she wasn’t the one who first broached the subject, it was TOB for sure.

      • aftershocks says:

        ^^ Yeah @Jaded. Khate was more wrapped up in bitching about the fit of little bridesmaid dresses; wearing white to her bro-in-law’s royal wedding; and allowing the lying leak that Meghan made her cry, to be perpetuated.

        Plus, Khate had no power to suggest that H&M’s kids might not receive HRH Prince/ Princess titles, which M&H said became part of the conversations. I believe it was William who made the ‘skin color’/ ‘what would that look like?’ remarks, and Chuck was present when the comments were made. Surely, Will’s intention was to prod Harry into backing out of marrying Meg.

        According to M&H, the conversations happened first before their marriage, and cropped up again during Meg’s pregnancy with Archie.

      • notasugarhere says:

        We’ve seen Kate’s inability to conceal her racism for over a decade. We’ve also heard and read her verbal diarrhea during that time. Kate absolutely could be one of the members of the family who felt free to blurt out whatever racist comments she wanted.

  10. ML says:

    Let’s put it this way: W is the obvious suspect. The queen put out that nasty lie, that their recollections vary. Anybody out there that believes QE2 would lie for QCC or K? And that’s probably why it took her a couple of days to respond to the accusation after the Oprah interview: the RF have known exactly who the royal racist is all along.
    And the fact that this story popped into existence around the same time we’re learning that Murdoch paid W a huge settlement for phone hacking, whereas Harry has to take him to court? W&K played nice for the cameras in Birmingham recently? BP and KP are battling it out, so it’s time to serve up some popcorn.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      I really do not think Harry wants a personal private financial settlement from Murdoch. Harry wants a clear admission of guilt and an apology printed on the front page of The Sun.

      With regards to the other brother, I am sure Peggington would accept any financial payout that came his way.

      • ML says:

        BayTampaBay, Absolutely. It sounds as though that was the original agreement and Murdoch et al reneged.
        “ Harry says News UK failed to uphold its side of the secret agreement when he sought this apology in 2017. He claims meetings were arranged involving Rebekah Brooks, the chief executive of Murdoch’s News UK, and Robert Thomson, the global head of Murdoch’s global News Corp business, but they went nowhere.”
        And as you stated, the financials were more important to W than the agreed-upon apology + settlement.

      • notasugarhere says:

        I think he also wants 1) legal charges against everyone involved and 2) ironclad guarantees that no member of his family (himself, Meghan, children) will ever be targeted like this again.

  11. Peachy says:

    Not Harry. William settled.
    Editing to add William settled in 2020 but it was unknown until now. Celebitchy has the story up.

  12. Peachy says:

    Methinks the racist pegger doth protest too much. He’s the only one to address it directly.

  13. Layla says:

    As a Brit, it really bothers me when the public seemingly forget all the sh*t these guys (specifically W (and K)) have done. They forget that this guy is a physical abuser, a mental gaslighter, he’s racist, he’s rude and misogynistic but he’s the one that instantly gets a lot of passes.
    Charles, Camilla, Kate and all the rest might irritate me, but I after everything, I don’t think I hate them as much as I hate W. He’s the absolute worst. And we’re stuck with him

    • JanetDR says:

      There was a time when I thought perhaps Charles would work to end the monarchy during his reign because Wiliam is so obviously unsuited.
      I was absolutely wrong (First time in my life! 🤣).
      But honestly, right now I am hoping that Chuckles lives a very long life…

  14. Jais says:

    Well, actually the letter proved that recollections do not in fact vary. And jeez, what’s Anne’s problem?

    • windyriver says:

      My question as well, about Anne. Maybe it has to do with the preconceptions about Meghan being an actress? Harry said in the doc that was a major sticking point for the family early on.

    • Lorelei says:

      Yeah, I was wondering about Anne as well. What’s her problem with Meghan? Considering that disgusting neanderthal Mike Tindall is who HER daughter chose to marry, she should maybe shut up about who her siblings’ children choose.

    • notasugarhere says:

      It may be projection by the writer about Anne’s ‘not liking how younger royals do things’. That could easily have been pointed at W&K’s laziness, not at Meghan, but these RRs will try to make anything be about/against Meghan.

    • Lara (the other) says:

      Maybe Anne has a problem with everything that is not done in the horsey, stuffy, aristocratic british way. And Meghan was to glamouros, an actress, an american and biracial, does not look like a horse and has style.

  15. Harper says:

    It’s Burger King. He is the only one left standing with a reputation that the palace is still furiously protecting.

    Charles and Camilla have lived through terrible scandal and have already trashed their reputations. No one cares about rude Anne. Kate has no power and is a mumbling air head whose ramblings about babies Harry would automatically tune out.

    However, Harry and Meghan have zero good to say about William, but are decent enough people to not out him directly. They also know the palace is full of snakes and will eventually sic on each other.

    Also, the accusations are hanging over the Coronation to the point where the monarchy as a whole is being damaged. I’m sure Cams is telling CRex that this should have been cleared up when it came out. But, because it was left to float for so long, CRex is now paying the price on his Big Hat Day. Thus The Telegraph leak, which flopped. They’ll try again.

    • Becks1 says:

      It also brings to mind the text that Harry got from William while Meghan was chatting with Tyler Perry, when Tyler was like “welllllll….I’ll let you deal with that…..” My guess is Tyler Perry knows it was William as well.

      • lanne says:

        I think it would be wise to tell other people who they trust what really happened. That way if something happens to them, the truth can come out. It’s grim that they have to think that way, but I believe the Sussexes have their bases covered, and are under no illusions when it comes to what the Windsors are willing to do.

      • Over it says:

        I remember this .I would give my right arm to know what willy texted Harry . Bet his ass forgot about Harry and Meghan keeping receipts. I so believe it is willy but I am willing to say it could have been Kate . That’s the problem when all your asses are racist as f.

      • Harper says:

        So Sykes is saying that the circle of people in the know as to the identity of the Royal Racist is growing “increasingly large.” We don’t know for sure if The Telegraph/Vicky Ward saw the letter and the name, but Sykes seems to be hinting that it’s no longer a tight secret, and the identity will soon be outed. Tick tock, tick tock Willy.

  16. Becks1 says:

    Of course it was William. That’s why I found the kerfuffle over the letter kind of funny – I viewed it less about Meghan and more about Charles throwing William under the bus. Charles wants it cleared up before his coronation that he was NOT the one who had the conversation with Meghan. He (or his team) was seeing the comments about the all-white coronation etc. I think the letter was leaked to try to head off those comments by making it clear that HE was not the one with a problem with Meghan because of her race. (maybe other problems, but he is really trying to make it clear that HE was not the one with “concerns.”)

    I feel like we’re a few Wales-embiggening stories away from Charles just outing William.

    • Sunday says:

      100%, the entire point of the “leak” was to clear Charles’ name, and I believe that was the purpose of the letter in the first place. Charles wrote to Meghan like “please tell them it wasn’t me (or my wife).” I’m sure she politely declined, probably saying she didn’t want to pour more fuel on the press fire. Charles would absolutely not see reason and would hold a grudge about that, which could probably account for the further deterioration of their relationship and the continued attacks on H & M.

    • Lucy says:

      It was for sure William. Harry including the info that Will talked to him about Meghan, and managed to say American actress in a pejorative way tells you exactly who. He goes from essentially ignoring his brother to having multiple heart to hearts where he’s slurring Meghan, he for sure brought it up as a deeply felt concern, multiple times.

      It has to be KC or C leaking, to clear themselves of the charge, but trying to blame Meghan for the leak tips it into Will territory. He is exactly unhinged enough, and blames her for everything. So KP and BP are continuing their proxy press war, using the Sussexes as cover and the bombs.

  17. Amy Bee says:

    Meghan and Harry had already revealed that it was a senior member of the family when they told Oprah that the revelation would be damaging to that person. Anyway, William exposed that it was him when he got his “Black friend” from Centrepoint to write an article in the Telegraph supporting him and when he set up that Sky reporter (who wasn’t the royal correspondent) to ask him about the accusations at an engagement.

  18. Mslove says:

    What a mess. It’s not a good look for this family to ban the Sussex children from the chubbly & then speculate who the royal racist is. It gives the appearance that they were snubbed because of their skin color & Pegs said they were very much not a racist family, or some such nonsense.

    Well, they are a racist family, and they show us every day, and the fact that there are several suspects proves this.

  19. equality says:

    So Anne who seemed totally disinterested when Kate gave birth to George is concerned about whom Harry marries? Does she have concerns about her SIL, the big tool?

    • BQM says:

      I don’t think Anne gets involved or cares much, on a personal level, with what her nieces and nephews are up to. I think that’s projection on the part of the DB.

  20. Over it says:

    Oh Tom , they like you are all racist. However you forgot one . Kate. Remember her? I use to be dead set it was willy the incandescent pegg but recently I been thinking it was Kate the slave freeing great.

  21. Digital Unicorn says:

    I think it will eventually come out who it was – given the stories coming out about the Wails I think it might be sooner that we think. There is a PR war going on between BP, KP and the Middletons with the Middletons and KP is losing all the time.

    To me it seems that after TQs funeral the Wails were given a chance, they blew it and they r being fed to the wolves to protect and embiggen the King and Queen.

    The damaged done to the Wails brand is beyond repair – a divorce will happen with kHate and her family taking the fall.

    • notasugarhere says:

      I do think Kate and the Midds are heading for a fall. BP against KP, BP and William against Kate and all the Midds.

    • Jaded says:

      The Midds are definitely circling their wagons what with the unloading of PP, Khate being shoved off into Adelaide Cott, Uncle Gary disappearing, they’re treading on very thin ice right now. And it wouldn’t surprise me a bit if Rose H was given some sort of lofty position within C&C’s inner sanctum now that her husband is Private Secretary and permanent Lord-in-Waiting. I think if the Wails continue to brief against C&C, Pa will have no problem dropping some truth bombs. Willnot’s in the unfortunate position (his own stupid fault) of having to STFU and follow Pa’s guidance or all will be revealed.

  22. EasternViolet says:

    I still think the comment could have been made by Charles. What if the comment were something to the effect of “Imagine how the press will react if the baby’s skin is dark.” Yes this is absolutely racist, but there is also truth in it as well. This possibility makes me think why Harry has been using the term “Unconscious bias” — is a term used to help allies understand the systemic racism beneath their comments/views.

    Just because Charles wrote the letter to Megan, doesn’t mean he was not responsible for the comment.

    I also like the theory that BP is using this letter to keep William and Kate in check as well.

    • notasugarhere says:

      If Charles was the one named in the letter, or if Camilla was, Charles wouldn’t be using this letter at all. If Charles is the one leaking this, that means it was William or Kate.

    • ChillinginDC says:

      It was not Charles. Seeing how they (Meghan and Harry) both said how detrimental this would be to the person if it got out, it’s either William or Kate. And Charles wouldn’t have leaked this letter if it had been him or Camilla. As others pointed out, he did this before the Coronation because the allegations of racism are still out there about the RF. He is doing that BS study on slavery too now as well.

    • Well Wisher says:

      King Charles 111 threatened to sue at the time he was identified as the person who made the comment. He would not do so knowing that there was no evidence to back up the allegation that it was he.

  23. Truthiness says:

    In the big picture, I think they are all racist. I bet they’ve said far worse when Harry isn’t around. Get rid of the whole racist lot of them.

  24. maisie says:

    we saw what you did there, Kaiser (o;

  25. Saucy&Sassy says:

    I think it was more than one. Supposedly in the letter Meghan wrote to Charles she explained institutional bias. Now that doesn’t sound like one person to me. During the Oprah interview, she stated there were conversations. Plural. One of them said the comments were made before and after the wedding. This isn’t a one off instance.

    I suspect the letter from Meghan also says something to the effect that the comments were curiosity (whatever word she supposedly used in the letter–not racist). Then she talked about institutional bias. KFC seems to think that lets them off the hook. Idiot. I think it shows there was more than one person saying this. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if it’s all four at least.

    • BarbN says:

      Just a side-note question – what does KFC stand for? All I think of when I see it is “Kentucky Fried Chicken”.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        BarbN, you can read it that way if you wish, or you can read it as King Fcking Charles. Either one will work.

  26. QuiteContrary says:

    It’s William. He probably said it during one of his incandescent rants.

    But yes, they’re all disgustingly racist. And LOL at Camilla’s friend saying it’s “unthinkable” that the side piece would have said something racist. It’s extremely conceivable. She probably says 10 racist things every morning before breakfast.

  27. HeyKay says:

    Gotta figure, the BRF is fighting to keep the taxpayers money and keep their fat jobs.
    They are going to deny, try to plant other stories, deflect by any means needed.
    They will not change, admit they were wrong, or do anything other than spin to their advantage.

  28. solidgold says:

    I love that this is hanging over their heads, but I also sense many of the BRF supporters will not care. Same way the maga’s don’t care about Trumps corruption and lies.

  29. NERMINE says:

    Archie is the one who will reveal the identity of the royal racist when he gets older. My theory is that William will strip the Sussexes children of their titles once he becomes king, and that in response, Archie will reveal the identity of the racist person, whose is William.

    • sevenblue says:

      Even as a king, William doesn’t have the authority to take back Prince/Princess titles or Sussex title as far as I know.

      • Feeshalori says:

        No, he doesn’t, that would be an act of parliament which would open a can of worms among the royals and nobility, starting with Andrew’s title.

  30. Eggbert says:

    I bet Charles wrote the letter not to apologize, but to leave a paper trail of who said it so if he was accused of being the racist he could pull out of the letter and say no look it wasn’t me! Also he can forever hold this letter over the racist’s head to make sure they always do what Charles wants.

    • Well Wisher says:

      I hope that it was more than this, it will denigrate a decent act, especially if was kept a secret.

  31. SueBarbri33 says:

    It’s William. I can’t imagine Harry or Meghan caring about anything Anne, Camilla, or Kate would say–racist or not. At the most they would be annoyed. But I honestly think Harry expected better of his brother. The two of them were presented as a package deal for most of their lives, and now Harry wants nothing to do with him. It’s gotta be William. And I’m pretty certain at this point that his overt racism is just one of his personality problems. These are such wild times to be a royal watcher!

  32. HamsterJam says:

    If they knew it would make their eyes bleed. Those are strong words

  33. ChattyCath says:

    Word on the street, I mean old folks home is that Charles is ‘weak’ for ‘not dealing with Harry’. The point I made was that the RF have been hiding shocking and disturbing secrets for years. Morally bankrupt. Harry ‘can’t be trusted’ as he wants to reveal some. I don’t want to ‘look up to’ these flawed examples of humanity