Scobie: Duchess Meghan isn’t going to the coronation so she won’t pull focus

Oh, the royal rota was in a tizzy on Wednesday because Omid Scobie appeared on ITV’s This Morning and he fact-checked some of the royal stories going around, specifically about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Scobie has been hard at work on his latest book, Endgame, so he hasn’t been writing his weekly Yahoo column. He’s mostly been keeping his exclusives to himself. While it’s always been clear that Scobie has an “in” with the Sussexes, he is not their “de facto spokesperson,” especially since they genuinely have a spokesperson at Archewell. If they wanted to release information, they would do so themselves. What Scobie is good at doing is simply offering a more realistic and well-sourced perspective on what’s happening in Sussex World. Some highlights from Scobie’s interview:

How much Prince Harry communicates with his family: “Obviously this is the first time he has seen his family face to face since the release of [Harry’s memoir] Spare. But I don’t think people know there has been a somewhat regular pattern of conversation between him and his father since the release of that book.” Scobie said that while they had not “discussed the details and the points that he wanted to go into,” Harry “has had contact with his dad.”

Harry spoke to his father about the Frogmore eviction: “They lose the keys to that any week now, and he would have spoken to his father about that.”

Harry’s relationship with William: “There has been minimal contact since the queen’s funeral.”

Why Meghan is skipping the coronation: Scobie dismissed claims that Meghan had decided not to attend the coronation due to it being on the same day as son Archie’s birthday, saying she was instead motivated by a desire not to overshadow proceedings. He said: “She is aware just how much of the spotlight goes on her when she sets even a foot near the story. It’s portrayed as intentional. Should she come over and just stand next to her husband, the commentary and the narrative of the day would have been very different…[The family] would rather the attention didn’t go onto her. If you look back at some of Harry and Meghan’s biggest problems, it was all down to the fact that the attention was always on them at times when it shouldn’t have been.”

Why Harry waited to confirm his attendance at the coronation: “There was never any question on whether he would want to come or not. It was a question at one point on whether he would be invited, I think. From what I understand, the Sussexes had to wait for some time to really get the confirmation whether they were 100 percent welcome at this event… [but] for Harry there was certainly no question about [attending]. Ultimately he is fifth in line to the throne. He is a councillor of state. There is a serious constitutional reason for him to be here, and he takes that seriously, even though he’s not a working member of the royal family.”

[From The Daily Beast & Page Six]

Somehow, Scobie’s version of Meghan’s reasoning makes the Windsors and the British media sound even more pathetic. Like, Meghan decided not to come because everyone is obsessed with her and can’t stop focusing on everything she does. And that’s the truth too, which makes it so funny, and of course Scobie would describe it that way. As I’ve said dozens of times already, the tone was set on the day QEII passed away, when Charles banned Meghan from Balmoral and then briefed the media about that ban for the next four days!! QEII was dead and the first thing everyone was focused on was “where’s Meghan, are we snubbing Meghan, what’s Meghan doing, how does she feel about being snubbed?!?!” Unhinged.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

110 Responses to “Scobie: Duchess Meghan isn’t going to the coronation so she won’t pull focus”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Tessa says:

    Harry will be there and he will pull focus.

  2. ThatsNotOkay says:

    Okay–somewhere in between it being his duty and him wanting to support his father, it was always clear Harry would go…if/when invited. And I’m sure Meghan supported that. The question was always whether or not she would too–and she made the right choice for her and her family. Starving the British media of its sustenance, leaving them to waste away into irrelevancy without its meal ticket.

    • BothSidesNow says:

      I agree. Meghan is her own person and she is perfectly capable of making the right decisions for herself. None of us are owed an explanation as to why Meghan isn’t attending as it’s none of our business. As for Scobie, he doesn’t know either. He is simply giving potential reasons but he doesn’t know either.

      Meghan knows her worth and knows what is right for her and what is not. Thankfully she is choosing herself over what everyone else, ie the BaRF and the unhinged BM, are demanding. They can all rightly f#@# off!

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Agree. Meghan doesn’t owe an explanation to anyone. I’m happy she’s not going (as far as I know). Omid doesn’t know anymore than the rest of us.imo Don’t mind him expressing his opinion. It’s a helluva lot better than the f*ckwits claiming it had to do with seating.lol

        Wherever the Sussexes would have been seated would have been a magnet for the cameras/BM. Iceland too. Literally.

        The Sussexes, hypothetically, could have put out a statement saying Harry would be attending the coronation and Meghan and/or Meghan and their children would be watching the coronation while on vacation in Iceland(which looks like an amazing place to visit). Iceland would then be bombarded by members of the BM/RR. Those are just facts. The BM are not capable of saying that wouldn’t be true. Not with their obsession.

        Remember when Harry stalker, liar of spending time with him and nutjob that Harry alluded to as the person who ‘wrote a book about me to pay rent’ (Harry was making it known that she WAS/IS not his biographer and they didn’t have any kind of relationship) said Meghan not attending the Super Bowl with Harry was an attempt to pull attention to herself(Meghan). LOL Meghan, NOT GOING to the Super Bowl was an attention getting scheme. I’m just oddly fascinated/mystified by the erroneous logic of so called “journalists. royal experts”. It’s comedy gold and opposite day all at the same time with them(the BM). Off to donate to the Archie/Lily celebration.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Okay. I posted a response to BothSidesNow that is not showing up currently.

        Question: I went to donate and there were difficulties. Did anyone else experience this? fyi, it happened with a previous donation and then was corrected. I might be doing something wrong. Bueller?

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Donation went through. Patience was a me problem.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        My response that isn’t showing is in agreement.

    • missy says:

      YASSSS!!!!! starve them

  3. hangonamin says:

    “i dont want to pull focus” is a nice way of saying i don’t want to be harassed by your crazy media and then blamed for stealing thunder by you guys. wish scobie would just outright say that.

    • Kelsey says:

      I mean, he’s better than the ones swearing that Meghan just doesn’t want to be booed. As if smh.

    • Yup, Me says:

      “Don’t want to pull focus.” is also a nice way of saying “It’s not Meghan’s fault that y’all are inbred, ugly and boring.”

  4. Tessa says:

    I hope he avoids kate.

    • Kelsey says:

      If they were to catch photo or video evidence of her trying to get his attention and him blatantly blanking her I just might scream.

      • Kittenmom says:

        Ooh! Yes, please! Would love to see this.

      • Jais says:

        Yes! That is the coronation content I want to see. Kate staring longingly at Harry. Harry blanking Kate. All while William is staring longingly at rose. Along with Charles tripping on his robe and taking Camilla down with him. That, I would watch.

      • Sherri says:

        God I hope so.

      • Peachy says:

        @jais I would actually pay some serious money to watch that!

    • Lizzie says:

      Not to worry, Waity will have her nose in the air as usual.

  5. Brit says:

    Good for her. People can’t stand when you have self respect. The press clearly were expecting her to come ala the Markle Family popping up again and the angry articles about why she’s not coming. She’s not involved with the family anymore in terms of appearances and the press know it will probably be years before they’ll ever see her in an official capacity in England again. Don’t be mad because you backed the wrong horse and ran out your cash cow. Should’ve left her alone.

  6. Sam says:

    I genuinely don’t understand why people need to explain why she isn’t coming. Maybe she just doesn’t want to, people need to accept that instead of the “I think” “I’m sure” think pieces about her absence.

    • Well Wisher says:

      Yes. She did not want to attend. She’s over the general dysfunction: media and institution.

    • Isabella says:

      It was a most peculiar invite. They evicted them from Frogmore. They didn’t invite the children. They let the press know that nobody likes Meghan, that she would be frozen out, made to sit in the back. We learned that poor Kate was still traumatized by a 10-minute walkabout with Meghan after QE’s death. That Charles had not wanted Meghan at the death bed.

      At the actual funeral, the royals openly snubbed Meghan in front of the world press. Putting down the biracial American wife was more important than their supposed grief and the grief of a nation. Meghan held up, gracefully, but nobody could wish for her to go through that again.

  7. Tessa says:

    She is pulling focus whether or not she’s there.

    • BW says:

      This, too!

    • Whyforthelove says:

      Haha no kidding, she isn’t there and that is the focus

      • Jennifer says:

        Can’t win for losing. If you don’t go, you give them no fuel so they have to go off their imaginations.

    • Christine says:

      At least with her not there, one or two people will notice that her presence is not required for the royal family and British media to continue to make it all about Meghan. Surely that’s not too much to ask, that a couple of people in England think, “Wait….this doesn’t make any sense.”

    • Gruey says:

      Exactly. According to Wooton they might as well cancel the whole coronation now because Meghan went to a basketball game last week.

  8. EasternViolet says:

    Don’t worry all, the Ghost of Diana will absolutely be there.

    • Whyforthelove says:

      Oh Man I hope Diana has been saving all of her immortal anger to let Chuck have it on this day. I want rain, birds pooping on the carriage, drenching rain on Camilla’s hair just after her hair dresser finishes. All if it …pretty please

      • fishface says:

        …and while having a sneaky fag before the ceremony, accidentally burns a bloody great hole in the ermine queen cloak.

      • Debbie says:

        @Whyforthelove: Everything you said plus a cockroach scurrying across the carpet.

    • aimee says:

      it’s interesting…the ghost of diana should be the biggest pull for the media right now. literally wall to wall coverage of this f*** up triangle. instead they focus on M. so M should just outright say i am being harassed whether i do or dont, so why should i do?

  9. girl_ninja says:

    The RACIST British tabloids are using Duchess Meghan to pull focus from the coronation. They don’t have anyone with starpower to talk about except for Harry and Meghan, so they’ll make up any reason to do so.

    Meghan “pulls focus” by being THAT woman. Periodt.

  10. Brassy Rebel says:

    Yes, the media twits focus relentlessly on Meghan, then accuse her of deliberately upstaging the proceedings. But the camera loves her and will always find her. That’s not her fault!

    • IMary Pester says:

      @brassyrebel, yep, they baited their breaths from the moment the date of the coronation was confirmed, now they are lay on the floor gasping because their main source of oxygen will be missing. Megan has shut them all up and hopefully the loss of revenue will shut a lot of these “Royal experts” down and out of a job. There are two main attractions at the coronation, ONE is our Harry and the second is young Louis and tomorrow, if I’m up to it, I will let you all know how I think it will play out 😂😂😂

  11. Jais says:

    The RF was telegraphing through the media that, while invited, Meghan wasn’t really wanted. She got the message. She’ll be chilling under a tree for Archie’s birthday. While the RF continues to be symbols for hateful spite and pettiness. Saturday will be crowning Charles and Camilla as the king and queen of petty.

    • Eurydice says:

      They weren’t just telegraphing, they were putting up posters and neon signs and writing it all over the sky. The papers were full of we hate you, we don’t want you, we’ll shun you, we’ll put you in the back row, you’re not invited to any of the other events, your children aren’t invited at all.

      If Charles and the RF felt differently, they could have said so, but they didn’t. Instead, it was “oh, she wants to stay home with the kids.” Well no, you assholes – it’s because you can’t scrape together two cents worth of good manners and common decency – so don’t pin this on Meghan.

      • BothSidesNow says:

        @ Eurydice, that is exactly how this is playing out. They have been sending Meghan the message of not being welcome for the last 5+ years, why would she want to be around this cesspool of hate, pettiness and persecution??

        Possibly KFC should let that sink in as to why Meghan has declined to attend his Con-A-Thon. KFC should do some reflecting of his own actions as he is the main culprit of the constant abuse. A man that is 73yo, about to be crowned king, and he is STILL threatened by a woman.

      • Christine says:

        Word, Eurydice and BothSidesNow.

  12. Amy Bee says:

    Omid actually said Meghan is not coming because she wants to protect her peace. No one can’t blame her for not wanting to be there.

    • LB says:

      After years of terrible abuse, which the BRF and UK media are still perpetuating, just imagine the amount of work that Meghan had to put into healing. She should protect her peace at all costs.

      • QuiteContrary says:

        Absolutely.
        By saying nope, Meghan did the right thing for herself — and for her children, who need her in the long term. She’s not safe in England. And that reality should be laid at Charles’ feet.

  13. MrsFonzieFace says:

    Meghan is inspirational and aspirational for me in so many ways, one of them being how much self-respect she has. And how good she is at boundaries. All whilst being calm, kind and classy.

  14. equality says:

    Whatever the reason, it still looks bad for KC that he cannot make his DIL and his grandchildren welcome, however much “focus” they pull from him. I hope that Diana and protests pull all the focus from him. Meghan likely didn’t want to be credited for any protests and booing. When PH is around hopefully the chant will be “not my king” and not simple boos.

    • Debbie says:

      How could Meghan be “credited” for any booing when Charles and Charles and his wife have been loudly booed, had eggs thrown at them, and faced organized protests to the point where their parliament has enacted laws about protesters just before the Chubbly. I think we must resist the urge to adopt these people’s talking points and hold on to the facts.

    • Ginni says:

      @Equality If the masses boo the king and the side chick the BM will say they were booing at Prince Harry.

    • notasugarhere says:

      The derangers are already planning to blame all booing on Harry, just as they would have blamed all of it on Meghan had she shown up. That’s another reason why the RRs are angry she’s not coming. Not only do they not get to make money off taking her photos, but they cannot blame any anti-monarchy protests on Meghan.

  15. Becks1 says:

    I mean, he’s right. If Meghan came, she would do what she has done at every other formal royal event – she would stand next to harry, she would smile politely, engage in pleasant conversation with the archbishop or whoever, and then walk out of the abbey into a waiting car. That’s what she did at the last commonwealth, she did that at the queen’s funeral, she did it at every formal service she attended as a working royal. She’s not doing cartwheels down the center aisle, she’s not wearing the biggest hat she can, she’s not giving mean girl vibes or shooting daggers with her eyes or anything else we’ve seen royals do.

    And yet somehow, just her very presence overshadows everyone else and everything else. All the cameras go to her, all eyes go to her, and then the press and the royals will complain about she’s hogging the spotlight or whatever. What else is she supposed to do? So she stays home and now somehow THAT is pulling focus too.

    @Carrot on here said yesterday that they want her to stop breathing, and it really was chilling to see it just written out like that. Because that does seem to be what they want.

    • equality says:

      They should have learned from Diana though. Just not breathing didn’t lessen her influence and overshadowing of them.

      • Becks1 says:

        That’s the other thing, right? H&M are always going to loom over Charles’ and William’s reigns, breathing or not, as cold as that is to say.

      • BothSidesNow says:

        @ Becks1, Harry and Meghan will always be the super stars of that family wherever they are and wherever they go. I think it’s time that KFC deals with his own insecurities and the massive chip he has on his shoulder. (Interesting that he grew up resentful of his parents but refused to do better for his own sons.)

        Though, TOB is a lost cause. He will never grow up and learn to be a loving and caring man. He is simply incapable of that and doesn’t want to be.

  16. aquarius64 says:

    Meghan is still pulling focus from the Chubbly thanks to the BM and it’s cranking out these stories to make up for her not being there. I’m glad she chose not to come because she knew the BRF will treat her badly and she will not let them mistreat her and Harry’s kids. I figured Harry’s appearance was due to being counselor of state, so he’s there out of constitutional obligation.

  17. SURE says:

    From M’s case against the DM we learnt that she didn’t think O was always accurate in his reporting. I feel that’s the case whenever he tries to explain H&M’s reasoning for a particular decision.

  18. B says:

    Is Scobie the clean up crew up for the Windsors or is he trying to be diplomatic? I can never tell. In my opinion Meghan didn’t go because she knew she would be abused by the media and the family would work with the media to publicly humiliate her during the Corny. Then after the family used her celebrity and attendance to gain global attention for their Corny she knew they would leak negative stories about her attendance for months afterwards in an attempt to damage her. We all know this because the family CONSTANTLY briefed to the media how much they didn’t want her to come, were trying to figure out to control and snub her, and didn’t want her kids there. We know they would leak about her attendance at the Corny for months afterwards because they are STILL leaking about attendance at the Queen’s funeral.

    None of this is Meghan being “motivated by a desire not to overshadow proceedings”. She is putting her mental health first and avoiding people who’ve made it very clear they dislike her and will try to humiliate/harm hurt her. I REALLY question Scobie’s intentions when he repeats Palace talking points. When the news was first announced about Meghan not attending the Corny Scobie wrote it was so that she could celebrate Archie’s bday and now he writes its a desire not to overshadow the proceedings. I’m really starting to get why Meghan stated in court documents during the daily mail law suit that she didn’t like him or want to work with him because he constantly reported things incorrectly.

    • Etha says:

      Thank you. These are my exact thoughts. Though Scobie is fair when reporting on the sussexes, he is still a reporter who doesn’t know what goes on in their household. There are a number of times where his reports have been false.
      Meghan was thouroughly abused at the funeral. She should never ever have to go through that again. They didn’t care that their abuse was displayed on the global stage. They don’t want her there.

    • Sunday says:

      I completely agree. Scobie allowed himself to be used as a weapon by KP and Jason Knauf, taking KP’s talking points as gospel and furthering their preferred (and false) narratives. He was loud and wrong about so many things, including the god-forsaken cry story, and has never been held to account. Imagine how frustrating it must have been for Meghan, having Scobie proclaim himself pro-Sussex and proceeding to get everything completely wrong.

      I do think his Yahoo columns have tried to call out some of the palace BS he used to help perpetuate, and because of his own identity he’s less likely to overlook some of the more nuanced aspects of Meghan’s experience as a biracial person navigating Britain’s elite, but at the end of the day he’s still a royal reporter relying on sources and secondhand knowledge, not a spokesperson speaking with authority for Meghan or Harry.

      • Christine says:

        I mean, this is a bit of an overreaction. He has been the only person in England’s media who has tried to counterbalance the insanity. No, he doesn’t have Meghan or Harry on speed dial, but he clearly isn’t buying any of the bullshit the royals and rota have ever spouted.

        I think about what it must be, for Omid Scobie, from time to time. He still lives there, and his “peers” are the nutters. I would pick an entirely different career, in his shoes.

    • MsIam says:

      I think both of these can be and are true. Meghan did want to stay home for Archie’s birthday BUT she’s also not letting these people off the hook for their unhinged racist behavior. The royal family wants you to believe only the first is true but Scoble is saying that the miserable way they have treated her is just as much a factor.

    • Ace says:

      Scobie follows the palace talking points he has to work with them to get access because that’s what his job is.

      There’s some people who think that he’s some kind of Sussex defender but he had been working for a really long time as a royal reporter and Finding Freedom was researched and written with Palace approval. It was much nicer than other books about Harry and Meghan, but it was also nice about the rest of the family when we know now that things weren’t as rosy as KP wanted Scobie and his co-author (I don’t remember her name) to write. I expect something similar from his next book, he might discuss how the BRF can continue working in these new times but it still will be a pro-BRF because that’s his job.

  19. M13 says:

    I think what happened at the Queen’s funeral (or appeared to) decided it.

    They were not bringing Archie and Lili to that world.

    I think that’s why Meghan isn’t coming.

    • Jan says:

      Jane Goodall said when she was holding baby Archie’s hand to practice the wave, Harry told her Archie was not going to be doing that.

  20. Snuffles says:

    I’m sure those “conversations” between Harry and his Dad were about Charles kicking him out of Frogmore and Harry demanding his money back before siccing his lawyers on him.

  21. Noor says:

    It is funny how they dub Scobie as Meghan’s friend in all their articles. Be fair media and dub Wootton as William’s friend. Pier Morgan and Clarkson as Camilla’s friend .

    • Sunday says:

      Calling Scobie Meghan’s friend is their dogwhistle way of grouping the minorities together. It also silences both Scobie and Meghan to the larger royal audience – Scobie immediately gets dismissed as Meghan’s lackie (which is untrue, as we know), and Meghan’s true voice and spokesperson gets drowned out by someone who only has secondhand sources and guesswork instead of any true authority to speak for her. A completely infuriating situation.

    • notasugarhere says:

      And label CamelToe as the Kate/Midds leaker.

  22. one of the marys says:

    I wonder if the media are truly surprised she’s not coming. Ultimately they wanted her there for content and clicks so they must be disappointed. There’s much less to work with by her absence

    • Jan says:

      I think they still can’t get over 2020, when the Sussexes walked away.
      They’re use to Fergie always coming back for more abuse from the BRF.

    • MrsCope says:

      They’ve dehumanized her and to a lesser extent Harry to the point that they’ve drank to much of their own Kool-Aid and forgot these are PEOPLE with autonomy and free will. Not characters in their fan fic.

  23. Lovely Lady says:

    Meghan Markle is a Black women who is proud of her accomplishments and self worth. She knows the mess behind closed doors, so why continue to be a part of fooling the masses.

    In her short visit with these people, it solidified that she can do better all by herself (while bringing Harry up to par).

    • Maxine Branch says:

      Totally agree with your comment. When you know your worth you do not bend your knees for acceptance.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Lovely Lady, bring Harry up to par? I didn’t understand that comment.

      • MrsCope says:

        I can’t speak for Lovely Lady, but I think the up to par comment refers to her insisting that he get them help he needs to heal, and helping him learn about financial independence/responsibility (a concept he said in Spare was completely foreign to him pre-Meghan) and just helping him recognize what was his line in the sand and his priorities/boundaries!

  24. Ace says:

    When it comes down to it Scobie is still a royal reporter and, although his comments are much less unhinged than the rest of that crowd, they’re still made up. Just because the Sussexes spokeperson answers his emails, unlike say Valentine Low’s, doesn’t mean they tell him anything important. So I never believe him either because his main sources are still palace sources.

    Maybe Meghan decided not to come because of what Scobie claims, or maybe she she’s dealing with the clown (an actual clown, not a royal reporter) they hired for Archies birthday. We don’t know the reason, Scobie doesn’t know the reason, the palace and the rest of the rota definitely don’t know the reason. The only people who know are Meghan, Harry, and the people she trusts. And none of them are going to tell a royal reporter because they don’t work like that.

    • kirk says:

      Well said Ace!
      I’ve noticed recently that whenever M-H have anything to say, they’ll release it themselves (thru spokesperson) to outlets like People, E-T, LA Times or similar.

  25. tamsin says:

    I heard Scobie once that he doesn’t have an “in” with the Sussexes, but when he calls, their communications person will answer the phone and speak to him. They may not necessarily tell him what he wants to know. So not the same as being a spokesperson for them. Not so for the four rags specifically identified by Harry and Meghan. When I listen to or read what Scobie says, I am doing so with the assumption that he is absolutely not making stuff up, but probably surmising or drawing a sensible conclusion based on what he has been told. Nobody in the media gets any scoops- the Sussex team will announce what they intend to announce. I will give Scobie credit for trying to be a credible writer in the realm of royal reporting- which at the moment is a world gossip, lies and propaganda.

    • Jan says:

      Scobie called Meghan and Harry stubborn, guess they wouldn’t cooperate with him when he was writing his book.

    • QuiteContrary says:

      Agree, tamsin.

      And Jan, I don’t think Meghan and Harry are that petty.

  26. Jan says:

    Meghan liked Betty and Philip, after her funeral, I don’t think Meghan was going to participate in anything with BRF and their treatment at Betty’s was it.
    She have been saying my husband’s family for awhile.

  27. Carty says:

    UK media wants to put focus on her to cover up the fact no one wants to see jug ears and his side chick crowned and anointed in a church, on world wide TV. No one wants to witness that. Watching the night time parade practice videos gave me North Korea vibes. It feels different since it’s not a wedding.

    • Caribbean says:

      The funny thing is that I really think that people want to watch the coronation because of sheer curiosity. It’s the first one in over 50 years. So they did not have to abuse Meghan to drum up interest

  28. Is That So? says:

    *He is a councillor of state. There is a serious constitutional reason for him to be here, and he takes that seriously, even though he’s not a working member of the royal family.”*

    I’ve wondered from the start if being a Councilor of State was an important part in Prince Harry’s calculation to attend the fancy hat party.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Is That So? I thought he had to have a residence in the UK to be a Counselor of State.

      • kirk says:

        Taking away Frogmore Cottage will fix that Counsellor of State residency problem.

      • IMary Pester says:

        @saucy&sassy, why do you think Charlie chinless took frogmore cottage away, THAT gave e Harry his British address.! Another reason that I hope Harry buys a place in the UK, so they can’t take that title away from him as well.

  29. lanne says:

    The British media are angry that Meghan wants nothing to do with them. In their mind, Meghan should be crawling on her knees, begging for their attention. They can’t stand that she doesn’t care. How crazy is it: they want her there so that they can show her how much she ISNT wanted there. Make it make sense.

    Meghan refuses to play by the script they have written for her. They can’t force her into it, and they can’t stand that they have no control over her. They hate that she has no need of them. They thought they would have another Fergie to punch around, and most of all, they hate that Meghan’s lack of concern makes them all look bad. It makes the British media look racist (polls about infants? Really?) It makes the royal family look petty and racist, and erodes their glamour. (They don’t even realize she is saving them from themselves–they really think that shoving Meghan to the back of the room is going to look like a power play when it would just look racist AF). The glamor left the building when the Sussexes left. They are the sizzle, not the Wales. No matter how many tiaras or jewels Kate wears, Meghan shows up in jeans and steals the show. It would be funny if she went shopping during the coronation. She won’t, but her shopping trip for eggs could wipe the coronation off the front page.

    They wanted her to leave, so she left. Now they are angry that she’s gone. Bad, bad look. This is going to go down as an ugly, embarrassing time in the British royal family.

    • QuiteContrary says:

      All of this, lanne.

      • Angie says:

        I doubt she will ever go back there again for any royal events. Why would she. Charles may have to resign himself to never seeing his grandkids again unless he travels to California. Why should subject her and her children to toxicity from the British media and family.

  30. TrophySalami says:

    OMG he scares me haha that is all I have got. He could play a villain in the Barbie movie

  31. Jaded says:

    I watched the most inane special on CNN last night about the Clowning — Cameltoe was one of the participants and it was barf-inducing. All glowing compliments about what a great King Chuck will be and how Camzilla is so strong, stalwart, and supportive of her husband. The talk of their deep love and how Cam just stays in the background and does her work without fanfare was total BS. Harry was barely mentioned, only that it was Chuck who reached out across the abyss to be peace-maker. The chat about Peg and Stick was equally nauseating — how she works tirelessly and brings soooo much to the BRF and how they all admire her for being a perfect wife and mother. That’s it, I’m giving up on CNN, they’ve become a Fox Lite.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Jaded, many people are boycotting CNN. CNN decided to give the Orange One a platform for an interview. That’s my line. You’re right, they are becoming a Fox Lite.

      • Truthiness says:

        💯 CNN became Fox Lite when Chris Licht took over. Other than Anderson Cooper it’s become a waste of time.

  32. Jennifer says:

    “If you look back at some of Harry and Meghan’s biggest problems, it was all down to the fact that the attention was always on them at times when it shouldn’t have been.”

    Otherwise known as the “Diana gets more attention that Charles” problem.

  33. Beverley says:

    Duchess Meghan will pull focus as long as she lives and breathes. This is what’s so concerning — Harry’s family and the British media behave like they’d like her dead.

    It’s criminal, and a serious moral failing, that KC3 doesn’t use his authority to call the dogs off.

    History won’t be kind to him.

  34. Peanut Butter says:

    What a loss to the royal family that they’ve been too insecure to tolerate having any truly charismatic family member around for very long.

  35. L4Frimaire says:

    I don’t see the point of belaboring why Meghan isn’t going. After the funeral, why subject herself to that? Her reasons are her own but doubt she’s considering those assh*les over in the UK. It’s all so tedious.

  36. blunt talker says:

    It was a decision made by Harry and Meghan the adult grown-ups who know what and how they want to do something-the shit media rags in the Uk don’t seem to understand all their negative and disgusting articles and talking shit heads have made the UK look like some type of plantation with all the people viewed as slaves or subjects-all that bowing and pledging makes the monarchy look ancient and medieval.

  37. blunt talker says:

    Harry and Meghan made a decision about this event in the best interest of the Sussex family- I would not go where I am not wanted and talked about in vile terms in the shitstains called the UK media-If this brings Meghan and Harry peace between the families then so be it-I would love to see all the talk on cornation day be about Charles and Camilla and any other working royal- Leave Meghan’s name out of your odious mouths and minds-she is not there so why bring her name into it-I hope someone count the number of times Meghan’s name is mentioned on that day-her children’s needs and wants are more important to her than this event-she might have gone if the UK media was not so rotten to the core-the royal family on the world stage and Charles cannot control the media long enough to stop the talk about Meghan-this is a weak and spiteful king who reacts to being slighted in the least bit-this is his day and he should exert pressure on the media to keep Meghan’s name out of the mouths of the Uk royalists, authors, and news reporters. a group of maggots will be working together-Lady Collins, Dan Wooten and about 3 0r 4 talking heads- I think Harry knows they will be talking shit about him because of his presence at this event. God give the Sussex family strength and courage to brave this cesspool.

  38. blunt talker says:

    PS-Camilla pit bulls in the media will definitely be gunning for Harry-Harry’s dad is married to a woman who hates his children’s mother-I give Diana credit for trying to protect her sons especially Harry from all the evils surrounding her at that time.

  39. j.ferber says:

    Peanut Butter, I agree. The tendency is to let the trash stay and to chase out or kill the charismatic do-gooders. It’s a race into the swamp for them.

  40. j.ferber says:

    The way I would put it would be to say not that Duchess Kate chooses not to pull focus by attending the Clowining, but that she prefers not to waste her time on so many dickheads (or shall I say bell ends?) But I guess the first reason is the polite one, so . . .