Tatler: Prince William & Kate are ‘a Trojan horse duo’ for the monarchy’s future

Sometimes, I still think about that 2020 Tatler cover story about Princess Kate and I chuckle to myself. From what I gather, Kensington Palace’s minions went to Tatler and tried to arrange a big embiggening cover story about how Kate is all things to all people: a perfect mother, a top CEO, a harried woman who needs endless vacations, a childish mess who runs home to mummy all the time, a woman who looks the other way when her husband bangs her friends. Yeah, Tatler put their own spin on it and the results were hilariously shady. So much so that KP basically spent months waging war with Tatler and eventually got Tatler to take down the bulk of the story. Since then, there has been an uneasy peace between KP and Tatler, and I get the impression that Kate is still licking her wounds from how badly that ricocheted. So it’s funny that Tatler did a (month-late) story about Will & Kate’s “first year” as Prince and Princess of Wales: “One year on: how the Prince and Princess of Wales are subtly sowing the seeds of change to bring the royal family into a vibrant new age.” Some highlights:

A precursor to the Peg Era: The inheritance of monarchical titles, of course, should come as no surprise, but, after a lifetime of status quo, this new royal shake up feels like the beginning of not just Charles’s reign, but William’s. The heir to the throne assumed this title when his father was in his 74th year and – God Save The King not withstanding – the Carolean age can never reach the longevity of the Elizabethan. The first year of our new Prince and Princess of Wales has been, therefore, a precursor of sorts for what kind of King and Queen William and Kate may be.

Kate’s commanding funeral presence: Their tenure began, much like the King’s, under the shadow of immense familial and nationwide grief. William led the Queen’s grandchildren in formal funereal rites and Kate proved a steely, regal presence throughout. Whilst Camilla, always more loving partner than would-be Queen, appeared happy to fulfil the role of Charles’s emotional balustrade, it was the new Princess of Wales who stood out for her commanding presence. There was a streak of leadership to her stature, a sense of confidence that felt somewhat different to what we had seen before. The royal couple would take this fresh poise to the coronation where, decked out in their ceremonial finery, there was another gearshift moment. They were noticeably ‘Wills & Kate’ no more, but future monarchs of Great Britain instead.

Center stage: The couple have been thrust more than ever before onto central stage, filling their new roles but also the void left by now non-working royals Prince Andrew and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Their confidence in this new prominence has been noteworthy: the Princess of Wales has taken on more solo projects than ever before, the first of which was a seminal meeting with the First Lady of Ukraine in September of last year, and the Prince of Wales was a self-assured presence on stage at the coronation concert in May.

Katie Keen is busier than ever: The Princess of Wales has been busier than ever, undertaking countless solo engagements, spearheading more action in her early years work, her advocacy for mental health and sport and wellbeing.

A relatable country family: For there has been much more of this from the Wales family this year: just as they have become more rarefied they have also, strangely, become more accessible. Their social media presence bears the hallmarks of this new duality. There are frequent cheery straight-to-camera videos as well as slick video montages of their trips and events. They are a social media savvy pair, aware of their online presence and thus shrewd curators of their image. The result is that they appear both approachable and down to earth, behaving as both a relatable country family and regal heads of state.

Laser focused: They are a couple determined to do things their way. Sources close to them have described them as ‘laser focused’ and possessing a very clear vision of how they wish to operate, both in their current roles and as future monarchs. As part of this – in a break with royal tradition-they have recently advertised for a CEO to run their household, someone who must be, according to the advertisement, ‘emotionally intelligent’ with a ‘low ego’ and a ‘strong self-awareness and understanding of their impact on others’.

Antithesis of the Sussexes? William and Kate may seem from the outset the antithesis to the Sussexes, being a couple who, by contrast, toe the line and fall into step with all facets of royal duty, but they are in many ways a Trojan horse duo. They have a pronounced desire for the monarchy to evolve and, in many ways, this aligns them with the King himself, who has long been an outspoken advocate for his passions; from the environment to the streamlining of the monarchy. William and Kate, like Charles, are unafraid to allow a gradual evolution from within; to subtly sow the seeds of change and bring the royal family – from the way it operates to the ideas it engages with – into a new age. From the year we have seen so far, it seems they are already off to a great start.

[From Tatler]

It feels like Kensington Palace has been trying to make “Kate is working more” into a thing for four years, and it hasn’t stuck – if you have to keep reminding people that no, really, she’s doing more than she used to, your PR has already failed. Also, the mention of “countless solo engagements” is part of the soft-launch of the Wales’ separation. Oh, and “Trojan horse duo” is kind of amazingly accurate – Will and Kate present themselves as a by-the-books, charisma-free extension of the grand Windsor tradition, but really, they’re going to usher in the end of the British monarchy.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

98 Responses to “Tatler: Prince William & Kate are ‘a Trojan horse duo’ for the monarchy’s future”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. kelleybelle says:

    How unfortunate for the children that these two are little more than a pair of air-headed twats.

  2. Libra says:

    How can she look at the coronation pictures and not see the tinfoil tiara? It looks ridiculous, not at all “regal”.

    • Cessily says:

      She should have been ashamed to wear that holiday garland in her head. Imagine the Karen tantrum that went on behind closed doors before this decision was made😳. I still laugh ever time I see it, but it’s always good to know Michael’s can handle even the BRF tiara needs.

      • Jais says:

        I still remember how there were reports leading up to the coronation that Kate was going to wear a flower crown and we were all like what, no way!? But we were wrong😂 Just didn’t expect it to be a silver tinsel flower crown.

      • ClaireB says:

        I love this stupid “crown”! I love that Charles wasn’t going to let anyone but Camilla wear a jeweled headpiece, so Kate decided to do this. It’s perfectly on brand for her: janky, try-hard, and not-quite-right.

      • Christine says:

        I read the What Kate Wore article about the coronation. If you are curious how people can make absolute garbage into a point for the continuation of the monarchy, take a glance at the comments.

    • BeanieBean says:

      And how is it ‘regal’ when every year we see several people dressed up in something similar for that Order of the Garter little parade? (OK, just realized a lot of those folks are from the BRF, but still.)

    • Wannabefarmer says:

      I have had a vague feeling is familiarity with that thing on kate’s head but couldnt place it; its been like a flying buzzing- disappearing, coming back, disappearing- around my ear annoying, and only just now figured out what it is. Ancient Rome, the civic/corona crown. Finally. Now questions to mull over, does she know its roots and why did someone think it was a good idea for her wear this piece of clearly plastic thing?

      • Lux says:

        She’s always had an obsession with crown-like things. Remember when she and Pippa tried to make that dumb dome-like headband a thing? What a waste of foam and fabric that was.

        Also, agree with the misuse of the Trojan Horse analogy. Like, are the people who wrote that actually familiar with Greek Mythology? The “Trojan Horse” was literally used to deceive, in the guise of a gift. So Britain is Troy and the Wales are the Greeks who are ready to take the whole country down. Got it.

    • Missskitttin says:

      Maybe the worst idea to date.

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      Real jewels are Camilla’s like Africa is Willie’s lol. She couldn’t steal cam’s thunder with beautiful shiny expensive historical pieces, so she had to have that horrible head piece that I thought came straight out from lord of the rings elves prop warehouse.

    • Michael P Cowtan says:

      The whole Garter regalia is kinda tacky

  3. Dee says:

    The “Trojan horse duo” known for sneak attacks? For making unseen entrances to palaces when living separate lives?

    • seaflower says:

      Destroying everything from the inside? Not a good comparison.

      • QuiteContrary says:

        Haha, I know! This is a bizarre reference. But, as Kaiser says, probably accurate, because they’re going to destroy the monarchy from the inside, albeit unintentionally.

      • Kathleen Williams says:

        Tatler is still being shady with the Trojan horse reference. Are they calling WanK hollow and treacherous usurpers who will destroy the kingdom by stealth. Not a compliment.

    • SarahCS says:

      The Trojan Horse that will usher in the end of the monarchy though sheer incompetence? Wheel them in please.

      • Sarahcs: yes wheel them in. The horse is in your court Chuckles.

      • Lux says:

        Agreed above/should’ve scrolled down!

        Although, after I’ve had time to think about it, my tinfoil theory is that the BM is trying to be clever by using the Wales as the Trojan Horse TO THE U.S., where they will be wrapped and shipped in the image of global statesmen-ship, only to conquer the public with their medieval charm (and teeth)! Oh, that’s going to work like a charm…

        Seriously, all these “battles” being fought in their heads. Someone needs to remind Will that his military garb is purely decorative.

  4. Becks1 says:

    I’m laughing, I can’t help it. Kate is “steely”? This is the beginning of William’s reign (charles is going to LOVE that!) countless solo engagements? I’m pretty sure we can count them in the court circular if we wanted.

    • Nic919 says:

      Kate had bitch face during the funeral because she was mad that Meghan was present and she had bitch face during the coronation because she was prevented from wearing a real tiara.

      I suppose that is the same thing as steely, but it didn’t look regal at all.

    • Lorelei says:

      William literally cannot manage to not look boredAF for the BALCONY PICTURES on the day of his father’s CORONATION. (Not to mention the two of them couldn’t show up on time for the actual ceremony.) But sure, these two are going to work their tails off and “modernize” the monarchy.

      It’s almost funny that these two do so little that the media has had to resort to referring to them as a “Trojan Horse” 🤣
      Like, “all the hard work is in there, we promise, you just haven’t seen any of it in the past decade!”

  5. Bordelais says:

    Agree with the final sentence of Kaiser’s article – this is a weird word-choice. Usually if writers want to emphasise a slow, positive metamorphosis, they would use a caterpillar/butterfly. As explained in this Wikipedia entry, a Trojan horse usually means a scenario where someone has brought an enemy into a previously safe/secure place – wonder whom they could be referring to? It was the king and consort that hired the ex-DM staff, so who have William and Kate brought in that Tatler doesn’t like? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan_Horse

  6. Jensa says:

    The Trojan Horse was the catalyst that brought about the downfall of Troy, wasn’t it? So could turn out to be quite an apt analogy, but I suspect not in the way they intended.

    • Seraphina says:

      @Jensa, sorry didn’t see your comment – but you are correct (see my comment below)

    • Interested Gawker says:

      Well, it’s Tatler, they probably did mean it that way! 🤭Trojan horse is an interesting choice 🤔

      • TigerMcQueen says:

        Very interesting indeed. My jaw dropped, then I laughed. I had to put on sunglasses because of all the shade.

  7. Jais says:

    Emphasis on Kate’s solo engagements…

  8. Seraphina says:

    Anyone who knows their Greek mythology knows this is not a good comparison. The Trojan Horse was a gift but the Greek army snuck out of it and burned Troy to the ground. Maybe they are saying Kate and Wills will burn the monarchy to the ground as well.

    • Nic919 says:

      So is Tatler that dumb or do they mean that William and Kate are a secret threat to the monarchy? Because there is only one meaning to what a Trojan Horse does.

      • Seraphina says:

        There is even a saying “Beware of Greeks bearing gifts” – the horse was a gift to Troy. There is no way they are stupid and I think they purposely used the Trojan Horse for Will and Kate.

      • The Old Chick says:

        Nic, I left school the minute I turned 15 (had to go to work) and I know what a Trojan Horse is, even never having read any Greek mythology. This feels deliberate? So Will and Kate will precipitate the end of the monarchy? It’s such a weird analogy. Burn it down!

    • First comment says:

      This!!👆👆👆

  9. Wow they sure think that the Trojan horse duo is a good selling point. Obviously no one was very good in history. These two are laser focused on one thing only and that is to one up Harry period. Peg is trying desperately to take America and Can’t goes out solo and looking very chemically medicated to copy Meg. These two couldn’t give a rats ass about anything other than that.

  10. MaryContrary says:

    “Commanding presence” lololololololol. Good one, Tatler.

    • Haylie says:

      No one even cared about her once Meghan showed up. Keen was pissed about it. Especially during the walkabout.

  11. @BelizeEmpower says:

    Amazing what these PR writers read into & put it in print. “William led the Queen’s grandchildren in formal funereal rites and Kate proved a steely, regal presence throughout. Whilst Camilla, always more loving partner than would-be Queen, appeared happy to fulfil the role of Charles’s emotional balustrade, it was the new Princess of Wales who stood out for her commanding presence.” What a put down of Charles & Camilla while magnifying Kate as the savior for her “steely…commanding presence.” Most of us saw an empty-headed, mean-girl operating in a way we’ve come to expect when in the presence of Meghan. A ridiculous red, white & blue cape does not maketh a future queen…with substance.

    • Tessa says:

      There was spin that Kate was Williams emotional balustrade. I think Camilla had some laughs over kates coronation attire.

    • Daisy says:

      So agree with your post..
      Always thought Kate empty headed vessel who just copy’s Meghan.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Kate has always been an empty headed vessel. She copied women in William’s friend group to get close to him, copied Jecca for years, copied Diana for years. Now she’s copying Meghan.

  12. VespaRed says:

    I don’t understand how so many articles in different for-profit tabloids can be printed that says the same things, just slightly different and maybe with some shade. Texas is bigger in size and population- I don’t see how there would be one small family that would keep that state in thrall with the same crap for over a decade.

    • First comment says:

      It’s how propaganda works…

    • Lorelei says:

      I was just thinking that I’ve been following the BRF long enough that I’ve seen them cycle on the same crap over and over again, even the same *sentences* sometimes, and it really is starting to get boring.

      As another poster on here put it, the tabloids are “dumpster diving in their own trash cans” for story ideas, lol. (I’m sorry I can’t remember who it was because it’s hilarious!) They would make things much more interesting for all of us AND make much more money for themselves if they’d pivot to actually telling the truth about William.

  13. Tessa says:

    Commanding presence. No. Kate was a mean girl presence like when she took threatening steps towards Meghan. Camilla is no slouch she runs the show not keen.

    • Nic919 says:

      Harry is the only one with a commanding presence in that group because he draws attention without the ribbons and trinkets.

  14. Mary Pester says:

    Personally I think this “, trojan horse” comment was a way of bringing a bit of snide into this stupid article. Yes they are media savy, because they count every little slide show as an actual “event” that way their diaries look busy. Keen at the clowning looked like she was auditioning for the evil queen in snow white! (bet Camilla was psd as that’s her job). And why do they think it’s a good look to remind people that William couldn’t even be botherd to learn 3 lines!! Look, they can try and polish these pigs as much as they want, they will never shine, because the REAL jewels in the crown, live in America! A trojan horse is meant to enable destruction, so let’s hope it’s appropriate

  15. Parachuting says:

    If “steely…presence” is referring to that fake metal bush perched on her gopher hair during the Clowning, then that’s an apt description.

  16. NotSoSocialB says:

    “…they have a pronounced desire for the monarchy to evolve…”

    Translation: They wish to continue to be royal parasites on the taxpayers.

    • Macky says:

      That’s how I take this article too. “Don’t give up on them” is basically what this article is saying. Even if harry didn’t leave, trying to convince the commonwealth that Kate’s son should be given millions of pounds a year is a tough sell.

  17. Murphy says:

    Ok Carole.

  18. notasugarhere says:

    ‘Steely’

    Hard, brittle, cold, unfriendly, determined, unfeeling.

    Tatler reminding us how robotic, emotionless, single-minded, self-absorbed, and narcissistic Kate has always been.

  19. Sunny O says:

    How can they be a Trojan horse duo when we already know what’s inside the Trojan horse duo?

    Moral and ethical vacuity.

  20. Ciotog says:

    90=“countless” now?

  21. Chantal says:

    Trojan 🐎? More like a wrecking ball. The line about “future monarchs” was quite funny and interesting. When did Special K become a future monarch? I’m sure Wills loved that line. And the constant references to Will needing help to “reign” is very interesting . First Harry, now Kate the co-monarch linchpin What are they hiding??

    • Lorelei says:

      The whole Trojan Horse comparison is extremely strange and makes no sense, but if they’re going to go with it, we can at least acknowledge that this particular Trojan Horse is actually empty.

  22. Brassy Rebel says:

    This was written by someone on crack. I thought it was (bad) satire at first.

  23. BeanieBean says:

    Again with the ‘their new roles’ Tatler? THEY ARE DOING NOTHING DIFFERENT, they just have new names. SMDH.🙇‍♀️

  24. Amy Bee says:

    Seems like KP gave Tatler the talking points for this piece as it sounds no different to those written by the royal rota.

    • Lorelei says:

      I was thinking that too…I actually forgot it was Tatler because it felt exactly like reading the Fail. I don’t know too much about Tatler, but I was under the impression that they were a step above this kind of nonsense.

  25. Macky says:

    The only reason why it would make sense for William to marry Kate is if Kate came with a dowry; AND William thought his choice of wife wouldn’t matter. Like Kate has always annoyed William. Always. She was just highly convient and required no work.

    He obviously didn’t think about their future children. George will have to work extra hard to overcome the middleton side. I don’t think he will succeed. It’s silly for Kate to be queen consort. Just like it’s silly for Camilla to be queen consort.

    Yes Kate lied to William but when did he figure out she was truly lazy. He should’ve bit the bullet and divorced her after George.

    • notasugarhere says:

      He always knew she was lazy as he is. For the Decade O Dating that was useful, because he got 10 free holidays a year and Sex Waiting whenever he wasn’t chasing other women. It is a problem now because he cannot be ‘Global Statesman’ with a Middleton Millstone around his neck.

      • Macky says:

        On one of the exposed voicemails, William message was “I guess you are busy working”. It wasn’t the last time he thought she was busy. Scamming kate.

        Kate absolutely tricked him into thinking she worked for her family. Lol. He thought the jigsaw job was real. All of it. –now that I have written this out William probably thought “party pieces” was a real company and Carole was a genius. No Singapore for Kate.

    • Lorelei says:

      @Macky, I agree with most of your comment, except the part about George…I don’t think it’s fair to speculate about his possible negative performance once he’s older. We have no idea what he’s actually like, how smart he is, etc. The poor child already has it bad enough being born into this shitshow, and while the Middletons are definitely awful, the Windsors are far worse and *that’s* what he’ll have to focus on overcoming. IMO

      • Christine says:

        I agree with your overall point, Lorelei, this is a revolting thing to say about a child. Any child, I don’t care which one.

        Why are we talking about Kate having a dowry?? This isn’t the 1700s. I feel like I need to take a shower, to wash off all of this gross. This reads like one of those bullshit man groups, that gets really angry at any and all females, because female. To wit:

        “He should’ve bit the bullet and divorced her after George.”

        ??????????????????????????????

        I will never make an excuse for either of the Wails, but seriously. They were still in their halcyon glory days, when George was born, per any and all media articles.

        Macky, you are mad at Wills because he married her, not thinking about any future children. Please know, you need to seek help, this is a bonkers argument, from all sides.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Their halcyon glory days?

        W&K were separated for months before-and-after PGTips was born. Kate moved home with mummy, William stayed in Wales ‘working’. The local ambulance was on permanent standby at Midd Manor because Kate was there. After he finally left SAR end of September, he was at Nott Cott in London while Kate stayed with mummy for a few more months.

        Kate revealed it at an event on tour in NZ or Australia. Since she brought the baby along, the press ignored the comment and focused on making money off baby pics.

        Odds on William having another woman at the Wales farmhouse? We got the weird story of Kate, Carol(E), PGTips arriving at the house unexpectedly, ‘seeing a rat’ and running back to Midd Manor.

        The luxury four-bedroom farmhouse on the private estate of one of the wealthiest men in Wales? With the four full-time staff including cook and housekeeper had rats? Um no.

  26. Eurydice says:

    Lots of blah, blah, blah, nothing words. They’re going to be fresh and new and evolve the monarchy and change things and do things differently. How? By going on more and more disaster tours? What exactly are they going to do?

    • Lorelei says:

      They seriously do just rearrange the same freaking words (slightly) and reprint them over and over. What an inane “career,” to write about the royals.

  27. Elon's Sink says:

    They’re so “Trojan Horsing” that they were late for the King Tampon’s coronation.

  28. Lau says:

    They do not “have a pronounced desire for the monarchy to evolve”, come on. They’re perfectly happy with being part of that archaic mess of an institution.

    • Ciotog says:

      They want the monarchy (i.e., their own privilege) to survive. If they have to be to be ‘evolving,’ they’ll do that.

    • Eurydice says:

      They don’t even know what they mean by “evolve” – evolve into what?

    • Lau says:

      The Prince/Princess of Wales title is an excellent example of that as we can see that they made it so much worse than charles in very little time.

  29. Jay says:

    Once again, some grade A shade going on from Tatler! But it’s kind of perfect to describe these two: something unwanted that may seem benign but is actually terrible. You never hear about a happy surprise disguised as a Trojan horse.

  30. AC says:

    It’s funny how they are really Desperately trying very hard to repair WK image. Because people with common sense knows they’re Lazy, has no charisma, are not relatable, and has a terrible work ethic. In a way they’re a laughing stock around the world esp we get every reminder they have to compete with HM and HM are inserted in literally Every article. Well, they are idiotic to let HM go in the first place to help save the monarchy and get it back to the 21st century. So suffer the consequences.

  31. equality says:

    They are sowing those “seeds of change” so subtly that nobody has spotted one yet.

  32. Jaded says:

    The Tatler writer doesn’t seem to understand the meaning of a Trojan Horse. Either they’re just plain stupid or throwing a bit of shade because a Trojan Horse means a person or thing intended to secretly undermine or bring about the downfall of an enemy or opponent. They actually seem to be doing a good job of undermining the BRF. Keep it up Wales, we’re waiting with bated breath for the downfall!

    • tamsin says:

      This new article is in the same vein as the “Catherine the Great” article. In order to avoid a another letter from the palace lawyers, has to moderated the irony and sardonic tone so it is not as cohesive and brilliant a piece as the earlier article. The other article was a masterpiece.

    • Mrs. Smith says:

      Oh, I think the Tatler writer knew exactly what they were doing by calling the Wales a Trojan Horse. It’s so shady and hilarious!

  33. Lee says:

    I don’t think this couple will ever divorce no matter how difficult things get, they have their eyes firmly on the throne and want to prove their detractors wrong! They are in it for the long haul. My take…..

    • notasugarhere says:

      Charles (and many monarchs before him) show being divorced doesn’t make a difference.

      Whether William ever makes it to the throne or not? He is the one who decides if Kate or Wife #2 is beside him.

    • Tessa says:

      William can be king whether he’s married to Kate or not.

  34. Skyblue says:

    Everything I read now about William and Kate I imagine narration by Renee Zellweger in her Bridget Jones voice. I wish Bridget Jones could interview Kate!

  35. J.ferber says:

    Horse’s ass more likely.

  36. Krista says:

    Does anyone really care? Seriously , They aren’t Mary and Joseph.

  37. T says:

    I’m still gobsmacked that they showed up late for the coronation. Just, HOW? And they mostly got away with it without tears and recriminations from the BP about disrespecting the (dead) queen!! The monarchy!! Charles!! Camilla!! The carriage horses…!!!

  38. AMTC says:

    With reference to @Lux above and your amusing ‘tinfoil theory’ (if only they could be put in off shore detention) I think I will start referring now to ‘tin tiara theories’.

  39. Cassie says:

    She just looks like an evil witch to me .

  40. J. Jimeno says:

    Can someone please tell me why WanK was late for the coronation.