Prince William & Kate plan to do more ‘impact days’ after only doing two in one year

Almost a year ago exactly, Prince William and Kate visited Scarborough and did an afternoon of events within the community. Kate cosplayed Meghan, there were jazz hands flying around, and after a few hours, Will and Kate left and never returned. There was one difference between that day of events versus all of their other inane busywork. The Scarborough visit was supposed to be the first of their brand-new plan to undertake “impact days,” wherein they would go into a community and donate to some specific charity so that they were not arriving empty-handed. That was their big idea, you guys. As you can imagine, after they hyped themselves and told everyone about their big keen plan, nothing happened. They’ve only done two “impact days” in the past year (while taking a two-month summer holiday too). Well, Richard Palmer at the Express has an update, and he even added some hilarious asides about how much money the Royal Foundation “donated” in Scarborough.

A year after a groundbreaking trip to the seaside town of Scarborough, Prince William and Kate are stepping up plans to bring a lasting legacy to their visits to some of Britain’s poorest communities by creating “community impact” projects providing permanent benefits. The first two pilot projects have created annual grants for young people in Scarborough and a therapy garden and allotments in Pontyclun, South Wales, one of a network of similar gardens to help mental health. More projects are on their way.

“There are plans in the works for further pilots to look at how we can deliver impact in the community in the long term,” a senior royal source said. It may not always be a huge sum of money. Aides are looking at providing benefits in kind like the garden.

Even when cash was involved, the couple’s donation to Scarborough was hardly a princely sum, sceptics might think. Newly published accounts from the couple’s Royal Foundation reveal that they donated just £13,043 towards a £345,000 fund announced on the day of their visit.

But their input was vital, according to Celia McKeon, chief executive of the Two Ridings Community Foundation, which is working with the royal couple in Scarborough.

“What the royal visit allowed us to do was to catalyse a range of donors to invest in the town,” she said. Much of the £345,000 pledged as a result of their visit will be benefitting young people for many years to come in the seaside resort, where despite beautiful sandy beaches and numerous visitor attractions almost a third of residents live in areas that are among the most deprived neighbourhoods in England. Some of it was pledged as cash to be spent when needed but the bulk of it is tied up in endowment funds paying 5 per cent interest, together creating around £25,000 each year to spend on youth projects.

Ms McKeon accepted that alone would not solve problems such as lack of opportunity in the town. But she pointed out that Two Ridings and the Royal Foundation were among numerous agencies working with the local authority, North Yorkshire County Council, to improve life in Scarborough. She also insisted that even quite small grants to youth projects “can be really transformational for young people’s lives”.

It is early days yet but in Scarborough they are just starting to see the fruits of last year’s royal visit after a grant-setting session in the summer to decide how to spend the first annual tranche of £25,000. The money went to six groups arranging various activities, ranging from a summer of arts fun, to music therapy, and youth charities offering support and advice.

William and Kate’s advocacy for marginalised groups via community impact projects complements their work in other fields, such as his new project to try to end homelessness and hers to improve the first five years of children’s lives. They readily accept they cannot achieve those goals on their own but they can use their convening powers to bring people together who can, according to aides. They can use their positions to create a national conversation that moves those topics to the top of the political agenda.

[From The Daily Express]

Just so we’re clear, they showed up in Scarborough, posed for photos, donated £13,043, briefed the media that they were donating much more and structured the whole thing so that the Scarborough youths are only getting £25,000 a year to fund a handful of miniscule projects. This is offensive, right? It’s like some form of poverty tourism for Will and Kate – they want to be seen as these impactful humanitarians, meanwhile even their bare-bones charitable giving is so small, it barely has meaning. They’re not just going around and trying to get photo-ops, they’re using really poor communities to embiggen themselves without actually doing anything to help. By the way, Earthshot is structured similarly – Peg always brags about how Earthshot Prize winners are getting £1 million, but that “prize money” is stretched out over five years. Hellish for innovators who actually needed the capital upfront to grow their business.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

57 Responses to “Prince William & Kate plan to do more ‘impact days’ after only doing two in one year”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Impact days? Do they know what impact means? It means putting in the work to help said charity and getting lots of other people and other companies involved to bring the most to said charity. Think of WellChild and Invictus Peg. It is not just going with a photographer and crew to get pictures of you all dressed up and sitting with people while Can’t mumbles and waves around her jazz hands.

    • Eurydice says:

      That kind of work takes time, especially the initial process setup of how the charities will be identified, which ones will be supported, how they will be supported, building up a network of donors, etc. So, I wouldn’t be surprised if only a couple of charities were “impacted” in the first year.

      But, having said that, I don’t believe for a minute that W&K have done any of that work. It’s not likely they’ve changed their habit of announcing plans and then dropping them.

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      $25,000 spread over 6 charities. That probably can’t pay the people who work there so it’s volunteer run. During a cost of living crisis.

      So a couple of groups were able to purchase their regular supplies with a little less stress for one month.

      What. An. Impact.

      • Teddy says:

        It probably barely pays for the prep and overtime that was needed to host Bill and Cathy’s visit.

    • Campbell says:

      I’m thinking whenever Will and Kate get the fancy hats, they are not going to like it at all and it will be obvious. They don’t want to leave the house. They do the absolute minimum and they’ve always done the absolute minimum. What are they going to do? Send Sophie to everything?

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      They will do 4 days in 2024 and say that they have doubled the impact days by 200%, on a pie chart

  2. Angie says:

    That’s a pretty balanced article from Palmer. Hm.

    • Nic919 says:

      Palmolive has never really liked W and K and he was very critical of them before Meghan showed up. He’s made remarks about their low workload before too.

      He then went the way of all rota for a while because it was easier to criticize Meghan and Harry, but now he’s turned it back to W and K because they haven’t changed, they just had cover for 6 years.

      • Becks1 says:

        Yeah Palmer is definitely not a fan of W&K. he was just able to cover it up under hatred of H&M.

        But this is part of the issue W&K face right now – the press were never really on their side, they were just against H&M. So now that there isn’t that much to say about H&M, or that complaining about Harry at a F1 race just looks petty and people are over it – some of the rota is going to go back to their original targets, W&K.

      • jemmy says:

        @Becks1 – the BM were asked to brief against the RF but were given the freewheel to brief against H&M. In view this, the reporters would want to ensure that their income is not jeopardised by going contrary to what they have been asked to do. This is why is seems so strange & infuriating that these reporters fail to see the bullying H&M have been subjected to.

        I also read in the daily fail I think that an erstwhile editor for daily fail / some journalist who had previously worked with the daily mail is on QC’s communications team. That tells you all you need to know re the links b/w the RF and the press.

  3. Jensa says:

    It’s odd how so many of the current press stories about this useless pair show them up as being useless, lazy and ineffective – and these are stories from the pro-Wales faction!
    Interesting.

  4. Eurydice says:

    It’s not a bad idea to establish an endowment – but I’m not sure how the numbers work in this article. 345,000 was pledged, some will be spent and the rest invested at 5%. But you’d need a lot more than that at 5% to generate 25,000 a year.

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      I was side eyeing that math hard.

    • LynnInTX says:

      To quote the article (emphasis mine) –
      |Some of it was pledged as cash to be spent when needed but the bulk of it is tied up in endowment funds paying 5 per cent interest, **together** creating around £25,000 each year to spend on youth projects.
      — It sounds like some of that is cash. If the 345000 pledged was broken up into two parts, with only one part of it going to the 5% endowment, and the rest is cash spread out over a certain number of years (like Earthsh*t), that could actually create 25000 a year. The question is how many years does it cover, and what the 5% endowment would create after that.

      As an exercise, I did my own math on this. IF the cash was spread out over a 5 year period, like ES, then there is less than 300K (specifically 293,333) in endowment and the rest is the cash spread (specifically 51,666, or 10,333 a year). If it’s spread over a 4 year period, then there is just over 300K in endowment (specifically 306250) and the rest is the cash spread (specifically 38750, or 9687 a year). In any event, a large bulk of the money is coming from the cash spread. After the cash spread runs out, and the money comes from the endowment alone, the money per year will drop by a third or more (they’ll be receiving 14,666 or 15,312 respectively, from the endowments). The charity, in the long run, would do better to have the cash run out fairly quickly (2-3 years), even though it will drop their cash flow substantially sooner. The longer they are supported with the second part cash stipend as well, the smaller the endowment and the bigger their drop will be when it ends.

      • Eurydice says:

        Thank you for this. I missed the “together.” I saw “to be spent as needed” and thought unrestricted vs restricted funds. The thing is that if the cash portion is required to meet the 25,000 annual income number, then it really isn’t “as needed” and there’s no point in separating the two amounts – they could just have one endowment with a certain percentage in cash and a budgeted withdrawal of 25,000.

  5. Amy Bee says:

    Some of us were saying at the time that William and Kate were not donating £345,000. The only reason that they wanted to appear to be donating that sum is because Harry and Meghan always donate money to communities and organisations. Anyway now that William has that Duchy money he can afford to give more. But I doubt they will.

  6. Scooby Gang says:

    It’s like they think that by calling them “impact days,” people will automatically believe that they’re making an impact. Another example of a title not being enough. You’ve got to do the work.

  7. Nic919 says:

    Kate spends more on clothing in a year than that donation provided to Scarborough. But if I recall, the sketchy low amount was available at the time they first went there, but the rota didn’t bother to pick through the numbers. I know there was a post here with commenters noticing the low amount even thought the media made it seem like they were donating six figures.

    • Becks1 says:

      I feel like Kate has spent more than that on one outfit! 13k is all they donated while they expected other people and organizations to donate the remainder of the 345k?!?

  8. ShazBot says:

    It would actually be totally fine if they were upfront and honest about it.
    Saying their foundation is contributing to an endowment along with other donors and that will mean 25k a year for projects benefitting youth IS a good news story. It just sounds worse because they tried to make it sound bigger and like it would solve all these problems.
    They truly are so bad at PR.

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      I mean …. It’s not BAD per se. But $25,000 spent between 6 groups in a cost of living crisis….

      If it was $25,000 per group that would be pretty cool and definitely provide actual impact.

      This just gives them a little breathing room. At best.

  9. Maxine Branch says:

    This woman is definitely mentally unstable. How many folks would consciously clone another high profile woman’s outfits and think it is okay? The money issue is a no brainer for me, these folks are again trying to imitate the Sussexes philanthropic efforts on the cheap. They want the same mentions but do not want to make the same investments. They are a sick pair of racists. Just sick and worthless.

  10. Concern Fae says:

    He could have just taken over The Prince’s Trust and coasted on a charity that is already set up and well run. But he hates his dad, so now he’s flopping.

    As to Earthshot, lots of awards are set up to disburse over time. It lessens the tax impact and helps ensure the money is used on new projects. If money is needed now, having certain funding in the next five years helps to secure loans. Lump sum used to be the norm and there were lots of problems with that model. Will is terrible, but this is considered best practices.

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      Perhaps running the Prince’s Trust was too much work and not enough hand in the cookie jar for them.

    • JT says:

      I don’t think Earthshot projects are the type of work that needs money spread out over x amount of years. These innovators are proposing solutions to the climate crisis of the earth. That’s expensive. Those projects need more than a fifth of that amount every year. At least that’s what I think. These people are supposed to be saving the planet, they need the capital up front to fund their business/innovations. Technology is expensive and what happens if the money runs out before they can complete the project? Wait for the next year? I also believe I read that additional monies for the following year can only be received with a new innovation. (Somebody please correct me if I’m wrong). So now they have to invent something else? Like inventions just happen all willy nilly?

  11. Mslove says:

    The only impact the Wails have is being a huge burden to the taxpayers.

  12. Mustlovedogs says:

    Where it says “use their convening powers…” I automatically read it as “conniving powers” lol

    Whole article damns with faint praise I think …

  13. The Duchess says:

    These two wouldn’t know impact if it hit them both in their crooked faces. I find it comical how the WanK’s operate. One minute they want to be superstars, then the next minute they proclaim they’re ‘exhausted’ and go into hiding for weeks on end. The truth of the matter is they want all the star power, but want to put in zero work. Ridiculous stories like this prove just that. It’s rinse and repeat with these lot and it will just get worse.

  14. ariel says:

    Duchess of Sussex- quietly visited fire survivors in the shared kitchen they used. She rolled up her sleeves and washed vegetables. She continued to visit (and actually help) and before the public got any briefing – the cookbook was imagined, recipes obtained, publishing deal obtained, book produced. Invited participants to the palace grounds, made press announcement and had reception. Ton of money raised. (i didn’t look it up, but i recall it was substantial).

    These people DON’T ACTUALLY WANT TO HELP. They are vultures and vampires and their wealth is unimaginable, stolen, not subject to any tax laws. This is evil living in our midst. And we raised generations of women to believe being a “princess” was a….. fairy tale.

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      THIS!

      I would hate to be famous. But then I think of the good I could do – the actual impact and the things that could be achieved, the places that could be helped, the people and animals who could benefit from thar and I am just flooded with ideas and things I would want to do.

      I think a lot of this generation imagines winning the lottery and the charities and communities they could help.

  15. @BelizeEmpower says:

    A therapy garden??? How does that work? They go sit in a garden and contemplate their misery?

    • Eurydice says:

      Sure, people could do that. But it’s also about physical, occupational and psychological therapy using plants and nature as a focus.

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      I read it as being called that to bypass what it actually is.

      A much needed urban garden that heavily subsidizes many families meals.

      I would think you can apply or pay for a plot and then you get to grow whatever would help you most.

      Therapy garden sounds better than the truth. That these people are walking the poverty line so hard that having a 10×10 patch of dirt to grow in can change their lives. Heck. It would change most of our lives honestly.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Gardening is quite calming.

  16. Lizzie says:

    How rich, W&K are Keen to do more work as they disappear for anther holiday and Kate refuses to show up for her patronage rugby game. Is this the workload they have been moaning about for 3 years that Kate took over from Harry and risked being able to make school runs? PR spin trying it’s hardest. School runs were never at risk, Kate hangs onto the lazy record for over a decade. I pretty sure that will be used against Kate during the divorce rollout.

  17. Roseberry says:

    This makes me so angry, I work in education in the Uk- imagine an Arts and Crafts day for 30 kids, you’d need 2 adults doing the crafts, a coordinator,materials, lunch and snacks for the kids and maybe transport. That would be pretty tight getting that for £4k, they could auction one of Twiglet’s doily dress and do some proper impact work!!

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      THIS. this is exactly what I was thinking.

      That it makes one month’s supplies a little easier to get. Hell they probably waited to buy all the cleaning supplies with it because they know what they use year round and the supplies really do go in waves.

      Like Omg all the construction paper got used up two weeks earlier than expected. And then it is replaced and languishes there while the color pencils get their butts kicked.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Might be some leftover Party Pieces stock lying around.

  18. Becks1 says:

    Okay fine they donated something, its more than they’ve done in the past. But 13k? That’s it? When even the rota can’t make this look good……

    • Eurydice says:

      Not just 13K – there’s the extra 43.

      • Roseberry says:

        The article says that £25k was the first ANNUAL tranche to be spread between 6 projects, this money is supposed to last years!

      • Eurydice says:

        @Roseberry – lol, I meant that the amount was 13,043 and we shouldn’t forget the extra 43. It’s hard to know what the 25,000 is actually. It sounds like it’s the projected annual income from the endowment, but there’s no way they can generate that much at 5% with less than 345,000. If they get more donations to the endowment, they could make even more income, but there’s no guarantee at what rate.

      • Becks1 says:

        @Eurydice you’re right, LOL. Credit where credit is due – 13, 043 LOL.

      • Blithe says:

        Which seems like a strange amount to donate. Did it fully cover the cost of something specific? I can sort of see that. Like: Fully covering a part time worker’s salary, or purchasing something from a wishlist. Otherwise, I’m imagining a very strange thought process: “Will 13,000 be enough? …. No? How about 13,043?” The extra 43 made me pay more attention to the size of the donation, where they might have been better served by noting that they were partnering with 3 other entities— to fully fund the cost of X.”

  19. Macky says:

    What IS wrong with Kate? She is so stunted. I get tongue-tied a lot so I’m not criticizing the mumbling through. I’m criticizing what she is saying. Her actions. She is so bad at everything. WHY.
    .
    She has always been lazy. However, she can’t fold baby clothes, can’t speak about anything, and can’t do a walkabout. Why is that?

  20. QuiteContrary says:

    They are always PLANNING to do something, but never actually doing it.

  21. MaryContrary says:

    I agree with all the above-and on a totally superficial note: COPY KEEN. Holy crap-that is such an obvious copy of Meghan it’s next level Single White Female, plus it legit looks awful on her.

  22. Lady Digby says:

    These clowns really are proving the republican case and I am bringing the popcorn for that. Both are inept and lazy. All they have to do is show up and be pleasant to other hard working charity workers or NHS staff etc., No one is asking them to work down a mine or on a Covid ward, just turn up 2 days a week for 30 weeks and thank other people for their effort and dedication. How hard can it be to be pleasant for 6 events on a Tuesday and Thursday within 12 miles of home? The late Queen believed public had to see her at bread and butter events. WK just want cake to themselves and do as little as possible believing that they are unassailable. They are looking increasingly irrelevant to me and that is an inevitable consequence of making no effort and leaving no impression other than laziness and incompetence.

  23. VilleRose says:

    So the idea of community impact project through grants tied to mental health–it’s a great initiative. But how are they just getting started on something like this? They launched Heads Together years ago? It does seem they are trying to copy the Sussexes/Archewell style of philanthropy…

  24. LynnInTX says:

    I should probably note that my math in response to a comment above is just a short and simple version. Actual endowment math is not nearly as simple, nor as quick, so what I put is a guideline at best. I strongly suspect the number of 13,043 is this year’s “cash spread” portion and that’s why it’s such a weirdly specific number. Going off that assumption, and using the short and simple method of calculating it, that would mean approximately only 240K going into the endowment fund, and around 105K of “cash” being spread out over 8 years. This would also put what the charities get after the “cash” part runs out (eg, what they would get solely from the endowment fund) at around 12K a year, or less than half what they are getting now.

    ETA: If anyone wants me to detail the math I used to get to that, just let me know. It’s mostly algebra.

  25. JEB says:

    Always announcing, never doing much else. 🙄

    Has anyone seen Mary Pester comment recently? Feel like I haven’t seen anything from her lately and knowing her health issues, am worried.

  26. J.Ferber says:

    Yes, I’ve missed Mary Pester’s comments, too. Smart, funny woman. Hope she is okay, too.