James Sinclair: The Middletons ‘haven’t got the kind of the money people think they have’

As we’ve described for months, Carole and Michael Middleton have been in hiding since the collapse of Party Pieces in the late spring. Party Pieces had been badly mismanaged for years, although I genuinely believe that PP was never as financially successful as the Middletons claimed in their heyday. Following PP’s collapse into insolvency, vendor after vendor came out to speak about how Carole Middleton personally screwed them over, that she was on the phone with them, begging for extensions and promising to pay PP’s bills eventually. Credit was always extended because, hey, she’s the mother of the future queen. Carole was also the face of the company, and she even went to New Jersey to showcase PP’s “expansion” into the American market. Then PP was sold for pennies on the dollar to James Sinclair, and now Sinclair has been trying to push a false narrative about how PP’s collapse wasn’t Carole’s fault and there’s no reason why she should ever pay off the £2.6 million in debt. Sinclair previously gave an interview to the Telegraph a few weeks ago, and now he’s been trotted out to give another interview to the Sun. Some highlights:

Party Pieces’ collapse: With such royal links it was a shock in June this year when the company went into administration with £2.6m debts, leaving suppliers unpaid and the 30 plus workforce in fear of their futures. The company was bought for £180,000 by entrepreneur James Sinclair and continues trading. James stepped in to save the brand because he recognised its legacy. Under the terms of a deal known as a pre-pack administration however, James was not liable for the debts that had already been incurred.

New company boss, James, a former kids entertainer, tells Fabulous: “Carole has a huge emotional attachment to the business, even now. She spent three decades building it, literally from the kitchen table up and the whole family was involved. She built into a very successful business. It was a wrench for her to see it start to fail. It’s no secret that she’s part of a family that is busier than most and she wanted to retire. She sold half of the company to investors, a new team came in, and she stepped away from the business.”

James says that even though Party Pieces struggled during the pandemic, it was still in a healthy position when Carole stepped away but believes, however well intended, that the new management team overstretched and spent too much money.

“In November last year they asked Carole to come back in and she tried to steady the ship. She was like a lifeboat and a force of personality, but it was too late. In my view all she was guilty of was trying to retire. Everyone thinks she came out of it with a big fat cheque but quite the opposite is true, she came out of it with nothing. People expect her or her family to foot the bill, but they haven’t got the kind of the money people think they have.”

For his investment James got around seven lorry loads of stock, the brand, some of the staff, the website and the infrastructure.

James says that Carole desperately tried to avoid creditors being place out of pocket but in the end that wasn’t possible. “She wanted the business to be successful after I bought it because there were staff there who she cared about and she wanted to make sure their jobs were secure,” says James, who ensured staff were relocated from Berkshire to the new offices in Essex. When you start a business from scratch and run it for 30 years, you care, you want it to carry on. It’s very much like a baby. It’s part of who you are, part of your brain and your imagination, and you don’t want it just to end. None of the family did because they all worked there. It would have been a crying shame.”

[From The Sun]

Well well – “Everyone thinks she came out of it with a big fat cheque but quite the opposite is true, she came out of it with nothing. People expect her or her family to foot the bill, but they haven’t got the kind of the money people think they have.” A fate worse than death for the Middletons – Clever Carole isn’t so clever after all, and after “selling” half of PP, she didn’t make any money? And she’s broke as hell now, too broke to pay off the £2.6 million? The answer for a reasonable person would be “selling that giant manor house, paying off the debt and downsizing.” But Queen Carole wants all of the trappings, even if she never earned any of it. Where IS dodgy Uncle Gary anyway? And whatever happened to that pot farm adjacent to the Middletons’ property?

Note by CB: Get the Top 10 stories about the Middletons’ shady finances when you sign up for our mailing list! I only send one email a day on weekdays after lunch.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Party Pieces’ IG.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

118 Responses to “James Sinclair: The Middletons ‘haven’t got the kind of the money people think they have’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Becks1 says:

    Ouch, I can’t tell if he’s trying to help Carole or hurt her here. He pretty much comes out and says they’ve been presenting a false image in public regarding their wealth.

    • MinorityReport says:

      I think he’s legitimately trying to help, but doesn’t realize Carole would rather poke her own eyes out with a smoldering fire poker than have the public know they’re poor.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      It’s a bit of both – he’s speaking out to distance himself and his own business from the fall out, he’s protecting his assets. That bit about them not having the kind of money people think (or in this case that Carole wanted people to think) the had was a snide remark – he’s basically confirming that they are bankrupt personally as well as selling a bankrupt business. For all her wailing about paying her creditors they were never going to do that even if they had the money to do so – they were always going to get that debt written off.

      That family were funded by Uncle Gary for years, then they got William to help them buy their big mansion, they then scammed the tax payer for ‘security’ upgrades to the property, raided the royal furniture storage and have grasped at every freebie they could get their hands on. They used their royal connections for years – from manipulating small business owners to demanding freebies from designers, they did it all and got away with it.

      They are not broke and will have money stashed off shore and am convinced Carole was going to relaunch herself as some sort of ‘influencer’ or ‘celebrity’ mouthpiece to make some money but that’s now dead in the water. The Middleton name is mud and these stories just keep reminding us of their grift.

    • Taytanish says:

      So, you mean to tell me Kate Middleton, Pippa Middleton and their parents all put together can’t come up with 2.4 million to pay off these poor little businesses that they swindled? This man is on crack if he thinks what he says makes the Middletonedeafs look any better than they did when they were first outed as con artists scammers. They need to sell that goddamn “manor” and pay people their hard earned money that you stole from them. Otherwise, they’all need to quit whining (through 3rd parties of course) about how malicious those posters that are demanding they pay up are hurtful to them. They’re a bunch of thieving conniving, hideous scammers of a family.

      • equality says:

        Did Pippa have anything to do with the business for her husband to take on their debt? They have their children to consider the future for. Kate has no money and not enough influence with Will or Charles to get it from them.

      • Taytanish says:

        @Equality, we’ve been told and reminded multiple times ad neuseum that Kate is worth tens of millions. The BM have reported an infinitum that though Meghan is “rumored” to be worth about 5 million, Khate definitely is worth about 15 to 20 million or so. So based on that alone, yes, she can afford to pay those that her parents conned and scammed.

      • equality says:

        Because we have been told this doesn’t make it true. Where would Kate have gotten those millions, never having worked?

      • zinjazin says:

        Maybe she sells her expensive clothes..

      • DK says:

        Is Kate not entitled to 50% of her husband’s earnings while they are married? Does the UK not have a law like that, or do they have one but it doesn’t apply to royals?

        In any case, keeping a 5 million pound mansion you bought when you were an empty-nester (it’s not like it’s the childhood home and they can pull on heartstrings about needing to keep the property), is a good look when you’ve literally bankrupted other businesses and forced loads of other people to lose their jobs.

      • Becks1 says:

        Well, his only earnings are duchy income, and IIRC, charles could not use that to pay for his divorce from diana. Didn’t he have to borrow money from his mother?

      • LRB says:

        So to the comment where would Kate have got any money.. I ask this… Philip came into his marriage penniless… he never did a ‘paid’ job and died with an Estate worth tens of millions. Where did that come from? If he accumulated wealth then surely Kate is doing the same? I never understand the concept of the Royal family’s personal wealth – they have never done a job that pays a salary, so where does personal wealth come from?

      • Becks1 says:

        @LRB Phillip was paid a salary for years from the civil list. He obviously didn’t need to touch that as the spouse of the monarch, so he just banked it for decades. The Queen may have also given him some significant monetary gifts over the years.

        Now royals are paid from the sovereign grant, which operates a bit differently, but as it is, neither William nor Kate have ever been on the sovereign grant*. they have always been funded by the Duchy of Cornwall (first through Charles and now with William as Duke of Cornwall himself.) Charles is Duke of Lancaster and that’s where the monarch’s personal wealth comes from – the duchy of lancaster. And then other investments etc along the way.

        *I’m not sure if there is any SG money that goes towards their KP offices/staff, but they don’t get paid from the SG the way Anne does, for example.

      • BQM says:

        @lrb the vast majority would come from his then-civil list, later Sovereign grant salary.

        It wasn’t much in comparison but he earned about gbp30-35,000 (today’s value) per year the last few years between his marriage and 1951. Since he had very few expenses he could’ve invested that. He was pretty shrewd. He also had several wealthy relatives who could’ve left him something. Inheritance from someone is how Albert purchased balmoral in the day. I also wonder how much was earned through sandringham. He turned it into a thriving farm.

      • C71 says:

        I agree. The Middletons debt won’t get forgotten.
        It crossed my mind. Has anyone given thought to the Royal children who are now decended from swindlers and theives. Not a good look .🤣 it’s not fair on the the children.
        ROCK ON Middletons pay up.

      • eve says:

        If William would have helped to finance the house, are we sure Carole is even able to sell it ? Is it still in the Middleton’s name?

      • Kathleen Williams says:

        Party Pieces was never worth the several million that was rumoured over the years. They would have been in direct competition with Hallmark and several other party suppliers. It sounds like a giant Ponzi scheme that came to it’s inevitable end. It served it’s purpose by creating the illusion of wealth so that the Middletons could get their daughters into the best schools and to honeytrap wealthy but gullible husbands for their daughters.

    • Eurydice says:

      I can’t tell why he’s even inserting himself into this situation. The best way to distance himself is to ignore it.

      As for Carole not getting anything from her sale to the investors, I imagine this is true. I think the company was debt-ridden even then and the investors came in with cash to pay some of debts, but not all of them. So Carole didn’t get any cash in the bank, but she would have had to pay those creditors anyway.

      • May says:

        Ditto, @eurydice. This person is also fudging with the timeline of events. “James says that even though Party Pieces struggled during the pandemic, it was still in a healthy position when Carole stepped away …..”. Rumors were starting pre-pandemic, around 2019, that Carole wanted to sell Party Pieces and I believe that is when she changed the structure of the corporation into an entity under which she would not be liable financially, in the event of bankruptcy. She knew then that Party Pieces was failing.

      • Nic919 says:

        Party Pieces Holdings was created in late 2019. Companies House has the exact date. But well before the pandemic.

      • Debbie says:

        As to why this Party Pieces buyer is busily inserting himself into the continuing conversation about Carole’s outstanding debts, I don’t know either. And just because one buys a house or a business from someone, that does not mean that the buyer is now privy to how much money the seller has in total assets or in available funds. So, this guy only knows how much he paid for the business, not how much available funds the Middletons have and, as such, he should really stop talking about the situation.

    • Wow, mommy Carole with an e is one ugly duckling.

  2. Rapunzel says:

    This is Carole’s way of saying,”stop putting up posters criticizing us- we don’t have your money!” Sinclair is helping her out. But i doubt this is accurate. The whole business collapse was structured to protect the Midds’ personal assets, so they have them. They ain’t broke.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      What I don’t get is why Sinclair spends so much of his time defending Carole and the Middletons. Doesn’t he have a business to run? He talks to the media so much you would think he’s the Middleton spokesman.

      • Becks1 says:

        He’s trying to make it clear he’s on the side of the Middletons, who are the mother/father of the next queen and grandparents of the future future king. He’s just protecting his royal interests, so to speak.

      • Monlette says:

        Easy. He wasn’t buying a business that’s made obsolete and that’s name is now tarnished to where there is no way it can turn a profit on nostalgia. He is buying a foothold into the royal family. Like Al Feyd did on The Crown. The Middleton clan now owe him one and this is all to remind them he is their hero. At least that’s the only way that this deal makes sense to my non venture capitalist brain.

      • Debbie says:

        I get what you guys are saying about Sinclair trying to curry favor with the royals, and maybe getting amply rewarded for it, but all that depends very much on the Middletons having royal influence (through their daughter). The prospect of that is getting dimmer by the day.

      • Becks1 says:

        @Debbie I don’t disagree with that, but some may not see it that way or may believe the happy Wales family narrative the press puts out 🤷‍♀️

  3. equality says:

    “She’s part of a family that is busier than most”? How so exactly?

    • Dhianna says:

      Grifting takes a lot of time.

    • Miranda says:

      Well, it does take a lot of effort to come up with multiple business ideas and completely fuck them up (runs in the family, apparently). And maintaining the Meghan lookbook is quite a feat.

    • Roo says:

      Yeah, that was a silly and even insulting statement. The Middletons, and especially their daughters, have lots of help at home. Nannies, cooks, cleaners. How is Carole so busy? Please.

      • Kate Is stuck at Adelaide cottage and no room for a live in nanny – she and Willie wanted the Royal Lodge so they could live in splendour in separate wings from each other! Wilie has discarded her and her free loading family

    • SarahCS says:

      Planning and planting stories in the press, responding to stories they don’t like in the press….

      • Debbie says:

        In other words, “Don’t explain, don’t complain” and don’t leave your fingerprints on the stories.

    • Rapunzel says:

      They’re busy pulling the posters which expose their grift.

    • Harper says:

      Getting to and from Mustique is not easy. Plus there are a lot of other vacations they are busy with that no one knows about, or so CarolE bragged recently, like The Isles of Scilly. Dealing with debtors is for peasants.

    • DK says:

      Y’all! Her eldest child is about to…start…thinking about taking on more responsibility now that’s she’s a middle-aged Princess of Wales! She will take on more work once all her children are in college so she no longer has to do the school run, and she is busy telling the newspapers all about how she will be ready to be a modern middle-aged princess then!

      And that requires support from Carole, surely.

      They are obviously busier than most therefore.

    • SIde Eye says:

      All of your comments are golden! Spot on!

  4. Jay says:

    “People expect her or her family to foot the bill, but they haven’t got the kind of the money people think they have.”

    Except for we know very well that the Middleton’s son- in-law recently came into duchy money! So at least some of the family could make these creditors whole if they wanted to, they just… don’t want to. Ditto selling Middleton Manor – rumoured to also have been paid for by William. Something is fishy here.

    • Carole knows willies dirty secrets and no doubt blackmailed him into buying them a big house!

      • Jais says:

        But then why can’t she continue blackmailing him to get these embarrassing debts paid? That’s the part I don’t get. It would suggest Carole does not actually have blackmail material. Or she is unable to use any that she has.

      • Jaded says:

        @Jais — I think Wee Willy has them over a barrel via Kate. If they spill any dirt on him he’ll drop Kate like a hot turd and blame them for his marital woes. What we know about the Middleton’s grift, especially as regards Uncle Gary’s part in their so-called fortune, is likely the tip of an iceberg.

      • Nic919 says:

        When the house was purchased it was early on in the marriage and well before the rose affair. And the security upgrades were paid for by taxpayer money and so that likely covered a lot of the cost of the property itself

  5. Elizabeth says:

    Didn’t the Middletons also have a London flat that Kate, Pippa and then James lived? They could sell it and pay off their creditors.

    • Amy Bee says:

      That flat was sold a few years ago. I suspect the money they got for it was given to James to buy his house in Buckleberry.

      • Sarah Westwood says:

        I thought his wife was from a rich family herself and her family bought them their home?

      • anotherlily says:

        The flat was sold after Parliament passed the Criminal Finances Act in 2017. One provision of the Act allows the police or other investigatory authorities to seek an Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) and investigate situations where it appears property has been acquired by someone who does not appear to have sufficient financial assets. People who buy London properties for cash has been a particular focus. The law allows for property to be confiscated if the owner cannot show how they obtained the money.

        The Middletons sold the flat in 2018 , making a reported 1.2 million profit.

        A major aim of this legislation is to combat criminal activity involving money laundering.

      • Megan says:

        Except they sold the flat in 2019 for less than the asking price and made less than £600,000 in profits.

      • anotherlily says:

        @Megan That may well be true. I was taking my info from https://www.housebeautiful.com/uk/lifestyle/property/a25456072/kate-middleton-former-london-flat-for-sale/

        However, the point remains that they put it up for sale in the wake of the Criminal Finances Act. The fact that they accepted less than the asking price shows they were anxious to sell.

      • Tennyson.Sarah says:

        To Sarah,
        Alizée’s parents were never rich.
        Her late dad worked for France’s diplomatic corps abroad, but he never was an ambassador, a consul, a private secretary to one.
        They lived comfortably bec they received extra money for being stationed abroad. He was a civil servant holding a diplomatic status because he worked abroad for the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
        He retired in his 50’s, bought a derelict mill for pennies in Central France that he had restored and then run a B&B!
        Making beds and serving breakfasts to tourists isn’t being rich.
        Alizée got her BA in accounting and next a MA in Finances which landed her a well-paid job in London.
        Then, sadly, as first names are usually social markers in France, she has a name which is definitely middle-class, and rather lower middle-class. It means trade wind, winds blowing towards the equator.
        That said she sounds like a sweet person besides being a professional. I can also see how much James Middleton who has struggled so much loves her and I wish them all well.

      • Megan says:

        @anotherlily That law was targeting the billions that were being laundered out of the former Soviet Union. The Middletons would never have come under suspicion.

      • Nic919 says:

        Let’s not forget about Uncle Gary and where his funds come from. He is very likely to have provided the money for them to purchase the flat thinking it would be an investment once sold.

      • BQM says:

        @sarah I think Alizee earns enough to be comfortably upper, upper middle class. Nice home, cars, maybe a vacation home, good school for kids, vacations. But not ‘eff you’ money.

    • anotherlily says:

      @Megan Yes , the EWO is aimed at Russian oligarchs but it can be applied to home grown crooks. The starting point to trigger an investigation is relatively low. The fact that buying a London home for cash could trigger an investigation would have set alarm bells ringing for many smaller scale crooks.

      Uncle Gary and his openly admitted drugs racket is a key factor in theories about how the Middletons financed their lifestyle. A relatively small business importing bulk orders of low cost items from Eastern suppliers is an ideal set-up for money laundering. Until recent years the business was run as a private company which meant they did not have to publish detailed accounts.

      As others have noted, there has been no follow up report on the cannabis growing operation discovered near the Middletons home.

  6. Amy Bee says:

    The myth has been busted. Kate’s parents were never millionaires and they always lived above their means.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Yep – Pippa’s wedding was comp’d and I remember Party Pieces having a big sale on to get money, money which paid for Pippa’s ‘royal’ wedding. Lets not forget that there were several press releases from KP about Pippa’s wedding and then there was the ‘Will Meghan attend’ drama, all stirred by the Middletons to drum up interest and freebies for Pippa.

      • Sarah Westwood says:

        Pippa married the son of a millionaire though so didn’t her paedo father in law help out ?

  7. Too bad so sad for Carole. This article really isn’t helping her it is pointing out that she has no money if we believe the story that it went down hill after she sold part to investors. She should sell her mansion and pay back what and who she owes. She doesn’t need such a large space.

    • Dee says:

      True. If William’s not visiting anymore, and not bringing his security with him, then it’s time to downsize.

  8. Jan says:

    The Middletons have been living above their means for years.
    Three lazy children and not one can support themselves, they were raised to marry and depend on their spouses.
    James ran so many businesses into the ground, Pippa had opportunity after opportunity and failed, regarding the other daughter, where to start, “can you taste it, by smelling it”

  9. Mslove says:

    No more loans for you, Carole. You’re in the gutter. But don’t worry, Keen can show you where the nearest food bank is.

    • Sarah Westwood says:

      😂😂 karma has come for the deceitful Middletons!

    • SIde Eye says:

      Omg I love this comment – yep and she can show up empty handed with an odd smile and a dumb ass platitude about how this is the best time of your life…

  10. Oliviar says:

    In case anyone needs a reminder, the Middleton’s purchased the Buckleberry mansion AFTER Kate got married. They previously had a much more normal home. Which to me, means the Queen probably bought it for them as a suitable dwelling for the grandparents of the future king. They probably aren’t allowed to sell it, that would be so gauche.

    So the Middleton’s got a manor house, Pippa ended up on a huge estate, and Kate ended up in a cottage with just three bedrooms, hahaha! Was it worth it girl?

    • Megan says:

      Kate also ended up with a mansion in London, a mansion in Norfolk, and a cottage in Scotland, along with all the clothes, jewels, cars, helicopters, vacations, and servants. And I don’t believe for a minute they actually live in a four bedroom cottage on the Windsor estate. Ever seen them photographed there?

      • Becks1 says:

        Well we’ll see what Kate ends up with, but yes, I believe she’s living in Adelaide. why would she be photographed there? It’s not like the paps can sit outside the cottage to get a picture of her coming or going.

      • MsIam says:

        So are you saying Kate is a lying con artist like her mother? What’s that old saying about apples and trees? That whole family is a bunch of fakes. Maybe Pippa and her husband are really as wealthy as they claim but who knows. As for whether Kate thinks it was worth it, my guess is she probably stopped asking herself that years ago to preserve her sanity. I don’t know if its working.

      • Tom Hall says:

        None of that belongs to Kate, though. She is merely window dressing – I doubt she has a penny of her own money in the bank. She is completely dependent on her husband and the King. She doesn’t even buy her own clothes.

    • anotherlily says:

      There have been questions about the Middletons finances for many years. Until she was 13 Kate lived in a four bedroomed ‘semi’ which was being bought on a mortgage. The house was one half of what was originally a large detached farmhouse in Briarfield. The family moved to a larger detached manor house and also bought a sizeable piece land adjacent to the property. They paid in full with no extension of mortgage. This was the house Kate lived in from 13 until she married. The Middletons’ current home is ‘Bucklebury Manor’ a much larger home with extensive grounds.

      According to an investigation by the Telegraph in 2010 the Middletons’ profit income from Party Pieces would be around £130,000 a year. A comfortable enough income at the time but nowhere near what they would need to support a lifestyle which included sending three children to an expensive school, continuing to support them in adult life, taking family holidays in Mustique and buying a London flat for cash.

      • MaryContrary says:

        Don’t forget the shares of a racehorse! They have lived above their means forever. I have said this since they got married. Her parents’ finances have never, ever added up. Either Uncle Gary was money laundering or they have mountains of debt. Or both.

      • Nic919 says:

        Supposedly there was a trust set up through the Middleton side of the family that helped with education costs for the kids.

        That Telegraph article from 2010 is resurfacing but it seemed to identified the exaggerations from early on.

  11. Seraphina says:

    I cannot feel bad for them, especially Carole. She sold the image and was the image. Where she went she had that smug look on her face and used connections and was seen out and about. All she cared about was herself. And the fact that she tried to get a foothold on US market proves that she didn’t really care about fixing the issue before trying to expand. Party Pieces went to pieces.

    And if this was back in the 1940s and 1960s when things could be kept hush hush she may have gotten bailed out. But Wills isn’t about to throw her a monetary life line since the backlash would be brutal. And he will not jeopardize his money making duchy for Carole.

    • Rapunzel says:

      I would hope there are significant safeguards in place to prevent Willyboy from helping the Midds with Duchy money, even if he wanted.

      Tin foil tiara theory: I wonder if Wills gave the Midds money (from his Diana inheritance maybe?) to prop up their business and one of the things that’s caused the unmistakable problems between him and Kate is that he found out they wasted his money. That would explain a lot.

      • The Duchess says:

        It would explain Baldy’s incandescence towards Harry too. Harry used his inheritance from his mother to buy property in California and ultimately earn his freedom. Baldy used his to prop up his grifting in-law’s, only to end up despising them in the end. He is very much trapped.

      • jemmy says:

        @Rapunzel,@The Duchess – I would not have thought that £2.4 Million is a lot of money for the in laws- Pippa’s husband is purported to be a Hedge Fund Manager . He can make some investments that could generate the £2.4million as profit and use that to pay off the creditors. It may not happen overnight but surely he can raise that amount of money over a 12-18 month period.

        As for Willnot , he can equally and easily pay off the sums from his personal allowance or if he is that stingy, invest the money , let it generate an income that he can then use to pay off the debt.

        I personally think KC3 & his wife have allowed the story to run in order to curtail & cut the Middleton to size.

    • Nic919 says:

      Charles was not allowed to use Duchy money when he paid out Diana. He borrowed money from the queen for it.

      William will have to do the same for any separation so he’s known as cheap and there is no way he is going to borrow money from Charles to support the Middletons. And Charles who is not a fan of Carole is also unlikely to agree to lend money for that purpose either.

  12. Izzy says:

    The ownership issue is irrelevant, as far as I’m concerned, because in the end it was Carole who begged for credit and promised repayment, trading on her daughter’s status, and screwing over the vendors she did business with.

    • The Hench says:

      Yes, THAT’S the point. If the business had just gone under that would be one thing but Carole herself contacted suppliers and used her name and her daughter’s position to persuade them to trade when, without this, they probably would not have done. She made them personal assurances that turned out to be a load of lies. This is why people are angry.

  13. Scar❤️ says:

    These people purchased a diamond tiara for Katherine’s sister Pipa.

  14. Chantal says:

    I have questions bc he can’t be serious! What multimillionaire purchases a bankrupt company and continuously praises and throws pity parties for the previous owner? How is this beneficial to his reputation in the business community? Is he being financially rewarding for simping for Carol? And how is he so overly familiar with the Middletons’ PERSONAL finances? Funny how its radio silence when it comes to Michael and Uncle G.

    Dude, you sound like a fool bc no one is buying this bs. Carole successfully pimped out her lazy offspring, and all of them have wealthy spouses now – with one being future king – so there’s no non selfish reason for her and Mike to keep refusing to pay those creditors. Try again.

    • RoyalBlue says:

      Welcome to the grift of LLC. Those two are in cahoots. Carole got out of this and is off the hook for the 2+ million, and the new owner bought the income generating assets, and is benefitting from the sale of those items. win-win for them both.

      the one who loses the most, is the man on the street, owed the money and left to suffer.

  15. MsIam says:

    Maybe Carole can start working at Pippa’s petting zoo or James’ dog food company. Work that Middleton magic there!

  16. aquarius64 says:

    The only reason this new story is coming out is the Middletons’ social standing has taken a massive hit. They are William’s trash in-laws, the British Markles. They are using the media to try to get William to pay off the debts because any attempted relaunches will be hampered if they aren’t.

  17. Inge says:

    She really is Gloaty McGloatface in that first pic. Before it all came crashing down.

    • May says:

      LOL, I am still pissed at Attenborough for letting them name that boat after him. It will always be Boaty MacBoatface to me!

  18. Libra says:

    I believe that William is indeed financially helping them, not by paying off their debts but by gifting them support money. They have no source of income and can’t sell the mansion because it is not in their name. It is simply face saving for the monarchy to keep them afloat. It is to protect George and his future reputation, having bankrupt and destitute grandparents is not a good look. Look for Carole to be appointed on the board of directors somewhere with a hefty salary. Connections, of course.

    • MsIam says:

      I think this makes sense. I think the palace wants to leave this story out here about the Middletons stiffing their vendors to keep them from “getting above themselves” again in the future. In exchange they will throw some money their way to keep them afloat. That’s how the palace controls people as we’ve seen with the Sussexes. Either way the poor vendors get the shaft but the palace doesn’t care about them.

    • Unblinkered says:

      I reckon Charles and the UK Establishment will leave Carol swinging in the wind. Can’t see any self-respecting, high-paying, organisation welcoming her aboard now, she’s a busted flush. Only a few decades back she’d be in a debtors’ prison. She’s a crafty old cat, and will have stashed money away for a rainy day.

      I can, however, see them vacating their mansion. It’s either that, or take in lodgers…….

      • ChattyCath says:

        That’s unfair to cats! I see in the tabloids that Uncle Gary claims his dear sister CarolE is writing a memoir which will tell the truth about Meghan and Harry and Meghan are terrified. Watch out for recycled toilet paper flooding the market

  19. Moondust says:

    Last week I think, I read an article saying Uncle Gary ‘s participation in I’m a celebrity get me out of here had been cancelled. Is he running out of cash too?

    • Roo says:

      It’s either that or the RF said they’ll support the Middletons with funds to live on if they and Uncle Gary stop putting their names out there.

  20. GlitterballBird says:

    The public humiliation is such that Kate’s parents now owe creditors more or less the same amount M&H voluntarily paid back to the Public Purse – Karma is so ‘exacting’!🤭🤭

  21. seven lorry loads of UNPAID FOR stock

  22. JennyJazzhands says:

    What is this top lip face she’s making constantly? 🤔

  23. Mary Pester says:

    Hmm Carol, how much did you get for half your “successful” company? Where did that money go? Was it a new unicorn for your grandchildren? . Carol, your full of sht, just like your tame mouthpiece. PAY WHAT YOU OWE

  24. It Really Is You, Not Me says:

    I get the glee with which people are watching the downfall of Kate and the Middletons, but it also troubles me. Even if you absolutely hate them, so many of us are playing into the British class system by hating on them for trying to climb out of the hole where the British monarchy and aristocracy put them. Plus, Willy is basically Henry VIII who adored and favored the Boleyns for the time that he loved Anne, then killed her and cut them off as the relationship soured. Wills and the monarchy are the only ones who win here. Their PR machine is in overdrive trying to poison the public against Kate and the Midds so it’s easier to divorce her. But if you really want change, focusing on the Midds only helps the monarchy because we’re not talking about Chuckie, Andrew, Wills, and how useless they are.

    Before you come at me with how Carole used her position to get more work out of small vendors who didn’t get paid and bullied Meghan, I am not ignoring that and certainly I think less of her for it. I’m simply pointing out, like Katniss, that the real enemy is the Capitol, not the other districts.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      It Really Is You, Not Me, I think you’ve overlooked the point that it appears that the Middletons have been spending way more money than they would/could earn from their business. Where did that money come from? It is believed by many that Uncle Hooker and Blow was funding them. If they had actually had a business that had supplied them with the kind of money they showed the world, it would be one thing. That’s not what this is about.

    • Nic919 says:

      Carole and Mike Middleton placed their daughters in the way of rich titled men because they were desperate to be a part of the snotty aristo set. Had they just run their business and made money but living within their means then this wouldn’t go the way it did.

      Also Carole was very public in smearing Meghan for being skilled at giving speeches when her own daughter couldn’t cut it. And she was known to leak stories to tominey so it’s pretty much a guarantee she told the fake crying story to Tominey.

      The Middletons aren’t rebels fighting the system. They are sycophants ready to attack all threats to their climb up the ladder.

  25. Lizzie says:

    This isn’t a hate campaign, it’s a public shaming. I bet Williams friends who did not like Kates family are all saying we told you to watch out for them.

    • Jaded says:

      Wasn’t it William’s friends who referred to CarolE as “Doors to Manual”? This is definitely a “we told you so” moment and Kate’s teetering on the thin edge of the wedge as a result.

  26. QuiteContrary says:

    This line in The Sun story made me laugh: “James stepped in to save the brand because he recognised its legacy.”

    LOL, what legacy?

  27. Libra says:

    Please correct my memory if wrong but the Middleton family offered 1 million dollars towards the royal wedding and the Queen accepted it. Where did his money come from? In light of what we know now, they never had a spare million just laying around. He also paid for the hugely expensive wedding dress and attendant dresses and expensive hotel accommodations estimated at 250 thousand I read at the time for it all.

    • Becks1 says:

      I dont remember about a million being offered, but supposedly her family paid for the wedding dress and Pippa’s dress and also bought Kate those earrings she wore on her wedding day. I read they spent 400k total maybe? Or maybe just the earrings were 400k?

      Maybe it was the last gasp in their “snag a prince” campaign, maybe they never paid for anything, maybe it was Uncle Gary, who knows.

  28. Her again says:

    The pic of Carole getting out of the car reminds me of this

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/business-35804201.amp

  29. AC says:

    Many of us had suspicions for a while that they’re really not that rich. But they definitely fooled a lot of people. The truth always comes out.

    • anotherlily says:

      I think there were many in Palace circles who had suspicions about the Middletons’ sources of income. Stories about supposed inherited money and the ‘Lupton trust fund’ were being fed to the tabloids. In reality the education trust fund had dried up by the time Peter Middleton’s four sons were raising their own families. As for inherited wealth, Peter Middleton left an estate of half a million to be divided between his sons.

      As far as is known the three other Middleton brothers do not live in the style of Michael and Carole. They appear to be comfortably placed professionals. At least one brother is a solicitor.

  30. J.ferber says:

    They haven’t got the money to pay creditors they owe, but do have the money to live large in their mansion. Okay, got it. NOT. They are disgusting grifters.

  31. tamsin says:

    Hate campaign? That would be what they did to Meghan. Let’s call it a Truth Campaign.

  32. MerryGirl says:

    Grifters gonna grift. No sympathy from me.

  33. C71 says:

    To say the Middletons have not got the money, is rediculous. They have assets accumulated over time from their company profits. The company paid towards their kids education from the company profits. Middletons done darn well from those profits.
    They now fail to understand they have got to pay their way, pay the people who helped them have such a wonderful glorious lifestyle for so long.
    They have turned people against them themselves. Bucklebury villagers are being very tolerant at the moment, it won’t last though. Theres always a breaking point when people will just get fed up with the humiliation .
    ROCK ON Middletons you’re a joke.

    • Unblinkered says:

      Comment in today’s press reporting that sleazy Uncle Gary is working on a book ‘setting the record straight’.
      AKA Carol’s way of lashing out now her public life is finito, aka Uncle Gary’s latest money-making wheeze.

      For goodness sake, just stop Gary & Carol both! You’re tainting the monarchy.

  34. Janice says:

    Well why else would she wear her her daughter’s hand-me-ups?