The Middletons ‘scrapped plans’ to start another business to protect Kate’s reputation

It’s fascinating to watch, in real time, as the Middleton family clings to what little power and clout they have, all while the monarchy and the British media has their knives out. Carole and Michael Middleton’s Party Pieces collapsed in May and June of this year. Carole and others badly mismanaged the company and then defrauded banks, vendors and local businesses out of £2.6 million, money which will apparently never be paid back. There have been two separate poster campaigns in Bucklebury, calling out the Middletons’ fraud and pointing out that they should just sell their big manor house to pay off their debts. The problem is, as James Sinclair (the new PP owner) pointed out, the Middletons “haven’t got the kind of money people think they have.” And what’s worse is that there’s seemingly no way for them to start another company and begin to pay off these debts. From a Daily Express exclusive:

The Middleton family registered a company called First Birthdays with Companies House in the UK some years ago which they planned to launch once they had sold off their Party Pieces empire. However, we can reveal that following the collapse of their party planning business with debts of more than £2.6million, Carole and her husband Michael have finally decided to hang up their “entrepreneurial” dream and focus on family instead.

“The Windsor name took a minor dent when Party Pieces collapsed because of all the money it owed to hard-working people,” the source said. “There’s no way that the Palace will want that kind of thing to happen again. The royals are meant to be inspirational for hard-working people, not those that are seen to profit from the loss of others.”

Companies House records show that Carole and Michael set up the ‘First Birthdays’ business in 2006 to secure the name but it has remained idle since then. However, the couple signed on to keep it running as a dormant company in May of this year and changed the address of the company on August 31 from Party Pieces Childs Court Farm to The Manor Bucklebury in Reading, where the family now lives in a plush £4.7million mansion.

“The couple were busy planning their next move but have now scrapped any future business plans to protect their daughter’s reputation,” the source said. “Anything the Middletons do will inevitably swing back on Kate, so it’s best that her mum and dad keep a low profile moving forward.”

It was revealed last week how the Middletons have been the subject of a malicious hate campaign in their hometown of Bucklebury ever since their Party Pieces firm went bust owing millions to creditors.

“Everyone was surprised by how much money paper hats and cups were making, so nobody was surprised when Party Pieces collapsed,” the source said. “We just hope that the people affected will get their money back.”

[From The Daily Express]

One of the most shocking things to me is that I always considered James Middleton to the be the family’s black sheep, the one with zero business sense, the one who kept crashing company after company. As it turns out, James is a chip off the old block – the Middletons were well known grifters and everyone knew they were lying about their wealth for years. How embarrassing! Seriously, there’s a reason why Carole has disappeared from public view – she’s humiliated, her house of cards collapsed and the palace has made it clear that her lying grifter days are over. No more “businesses” being propped up God knows how. No more defrauding local businesses and small vendors. As someone who has always believed that the Middletons were never what they appeared, the past six months have been amazing to watch.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

79 Responses to “The Middletons ‘scrapped plans’ to start another business to protect Kate’s reputation”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Tessa says:

    I remember when Kate was dating William and the media was asking why she was not working a fake story of Kate starting her own business babykins a lone of children’s clothing. Of course nothing ever came of it.

    • Cairidh says:

      Babykins was Williams pet name for her, so that would have been cashing in on her relationship with him. He wouldn’t have allowed that. Possibly it was vetoed by William or the palace. Possibly the media made it up, which is more likely as she was too lazy to start her own business. Or possibly she lied, and said she planned to do it, knowing it would be vetoed.

      • Nubia says:

        Are you sure thats his pet name for her? The way he insists on calling her Catherine and not Kate,i cant imagine it Lol

      • Dee says:

        He was heard calling her “poppet” in the video of them presenting the newborn George on the doorstep of the hospital, IIRC.

      • Becks1 says:

        I think that was in one of the stolen/intercepted/leaked VMs.

      • dido says:

        lol even back then he knew she had baby brains

      • Lorelei says:

        Yes, I remember it too; it was revealed when their voicemails were hacked. And I think that might have been (?) when we learned Kate called William “Big Willy.”

        BTW, I love the way this paragraph tries to make it sound like, whatever were the poor Windsors supposed to do when they found themselves in this recent Middleton-inflicted conundrum? As if they aren’t one of the wealthiest families IN THE WORLD and could have easily avoided these headlines and the resulting “dent” by paying the debts of these “hard-working people” who’d been shafted by one of their own 🙄

        “The Windsor name took a minor dent when Party Pieces collapsed because of all the money it owed to hard-working people,” the source said. “There’s no way that the Palace will want that kind of thing to happen again. The royals are meant to be inspirational for hard-working people, not those that are seen to profit from the loss of others.”

        That last sentence is a real knee-slapper! For sure the Windsors would *never* want to be seen as “profiting off the loss of others.”

        Again I ask whomst is capable of writing this type of thing with a straight face??

    • BeanieBean says:

      Yep, I remember that, too. First Birthdays was going to be Kate’s spinoff line at Party Pieces, hers to manage, the way James got that cake line (his first failed line). And I think they had Pippa doing the newsletter. James tried & failed multiple times, Kate didn’t even try.

  2. equality says:

    Since everyone has their number now, I don’t see anybody investing in their business or selling them anything except on a cash-only basis. And their buyer has outed them as not having cash.

  3. Digital Unicorn says:

    I suspect that ‘First Birthdays’ business was one of the many shell companies they setup to move money around – that Express article from years ago basically said this.

    This is just a sob story to try and get some sympathy but their jig is up and there is NO coming back from this for the Middletons and Kate. Her rep has taken a lot of hits over the past few years, this is just another nail in the coffin of her carefully controlled image.

    Also that titbit about what the Palace said is very telling – it basically confirms what we’ve all been saying that the Crown is not protecting or funding them anymore. Kate is out the door and its just a matter of when its going to be made public.

    FAFO!!!!!

    • Seraphina says:

      yes, the piece about the palace was very telling. I remember all those sources (Ma Middelton) claiming she and Kate were the saving grace of the RF and saved Wills – gave him all he wanted in a family that Chuck never did and could not. Guess they showed Ma Middelton who is in charge ………. and why Kate replied to the question she is Wills’ wife.

      • Lux says:

        This entire article is shadier than any sign that anyone could’ve posted in Bucklebury. Shots FIRED.

        “Everyone was surprised by how much money paper hats and cups were making, so nobody was surprised when Party Pieces collapsed,” the source said. “We just hope that the people affected will get their money back.”

        God bless this source for speaking the truth, especially compared with all those “neighbors” who were bemoaning the fate of such a “nice” family. Keep talking, “source,” and never forget!

    • Andy Dufresne says:

      💯

    • Robert Phillips says:

      I suspect separation announced middle of January. And divorce early summer. All the stories about William being handsome and viril are just to much. Their trying to portray him as a catch for other women. But unless he already has someone else. He won’t find anyone acceptable to be the future consort. The type of woman needed for the role won’t marry William. So not sure how they will try to spin that.

      • Lorelei says:

        There is literally a huge headline right now that says “WHO NEEDS KATE? When you have (insert actress’s name; idk who she is and have already forgotten it)” right above a photo of William in Singapore walking the “green carpet” with some blonde actress. Yikes on bikes. Unnecessary!!

      • Becks1 says:

        WHO NEEDS KATE?!?!?

        oh lordy. Kate………yikes. Insert Whoopi GIF here from Ghost.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        The actress is Hannah Waddingham and she’s great. She was in Ted Lasso (played Rebecca Welton and i believe she got an emmy for that role), has a 4 octave beautiful singing voice (has appeared in many west end and broadway musicals) and is fluent in Fench and Italian.

        So yeah ‘Who needs Kate” indeed.

      • Debbie says:

        I still say that they will have to remove “Big Blue” from Kate’s cold dead hands. That chick will not go quietly. I may be wrong, or the last believer, but I see no divorce in their future.

  4. Amy Bee says:

    It’s been interesting to see people finally admit that the Middletons were never as rich as the press portrayed them to be. I wonder if the Palace had a hand in making up this story?

  5. ML says:

    “ The royals are meant to be inspirational for hard-working people, not those that are seen to profit from the loss of others.”
    Oh source, unfortunately royalty does profit on the backs hard-working people. See Exhibit 1. Taxes. However, source, I do agree that the Middletons shouldn’t.

    • Lorelei says:

      Right? Exhibit 1 is, like, every single thing the BRF has done since it’s inception, and spoiler alert, it ALL involves profiting off the work of others.

      The lack of self-awareness is truly unreal sometimes.

  6. Interesting. You can’t pay debts but have money to start another business? I call bull💩 on this story of fantasy. Carole is desperate and it would appear that the end is near for her darling stalker so now she doesn’t want to hurt her reputation. Too late you royal adjacent grifter. This is more a plea of if you’re leaving my stalker please take pity on her because she had your heir and spares.

    • Proud Mary says:

      “You can’t pay debts but have money to start another business?” My sentiments exactly.

    • LRB says:

      Her grandson will be King… if we still have a monarchy… even if her daughter is never Queen … she probably considers Kate’s unhappiness was worth that.

  7. EasternViolet says:

    My theory is that the (real) reason Kate isn’t in Singapore is that she didn’t have the money to fund the trip. William wants to shine and not spend his Dutchy money on her at all. These stories just underscore how big mad William is that her family can no longer afford her.

  8. Becks1 says:

    Ouch. This article is not from the Middleton camp. They were profiting off hard-working people??

    And this line- “Everyone was surprised by how much money paper hats and cups were making, so nobody was surprised when Party Pieces collapsed,”

    I mean, that’s basically just coming out and saying PP was a front for something else.

    • TheOtherOne says:

      All of this. 💯

    • TigerMcQueen says:

      My jaw dropped when I read that about no one being surprised. I know we’ve been saying it here, but to have what’s likely a palace source say it, wow. Definitely seems like seeds are being planted as to why a divorce might happen.

    • Nic919 says:

      That source seems to be coming from one of the palaces and I agree that is a harsh tone. I guess the question is whether it is a KP courtier or a BP courtier. Not great for the Middletons either way.

  9. Harper says:

    This is why a prince does not marry someone in trade. Landed gentry only–the tribulations are much more genteel. I think Willy learned his lesson.

    • SarahCS says:

      Which i’m pretty sure was his original plan only none of them would have him. The limpet clung on and eventually he was pushed into proposing by the queen.

    • Kingston says:

      @Harper
      “This is why a prince does not marry someone in trade..”

      Jeebus Christus.

      Had to do a double take on reading this post. For a minute I thought the site had morphed into one of those popular, bodice-tearing 18th century novels. 8-I

  10. samipup says:

    The words and message and tone Re: the Middltons are brutal in the newspaper article, no more helping them for sure!

  11. aquarius64 says:

    The Middletons are pariahs in the business world and most likely socially as well. They are afraid their standing will completely collapse when/if William files for divorce.

    • Campbell says:

      Among the many many Harry and Meghan articles in the British tabloids today, was one in the Express that is titled something along the lines of how genuinely happy Prince William is in Singapore without Kate. It actually says that. That is pretty bold and I’ve never seen them be so direct before.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Campbell, well that’s very straightforward, isn’t it? Something is going to be announced in the next couple of months. I’m buying more popcorn.

  12. Dee says:

    I recall when Kate was dating William reading about the Middletons “billion dollar business”!!

    • Over it says:

      Lmfao Carole the queen maker deserves all this humiliation and outing for her house of lies. She and her daughter, William’s wife made it their life mission to destroy a pregnant woman and her unborn child. No one can tell me otherwise.so I hope the bed of knives she sharpened for Meghan, are now glittering for her and Kate. God doesn’t like ugly.

      • BlueNailsBetty says:

        A-freaking-men.

        I loathe the royals (except for Eugenie) but watching them take down the Middletons is pretty darn satisfying.

        I hope I live long enough to see the public do the same to the royals.

  13. LeonsMomma says:

    This just made me think that Charlotte and Louis are going to be more economically tied to the crown so they can’t escape. At least Harry had the money he inherited from his mother’s estate and backup from the Spencers and the love of a good woman! Charlotte and Louis will have … Uncle Gary.
    (George will be fine. But who knows if the firm is sowing seeds if discontent between siblings, even at this young age.)

    • The Duchess says:

      Baldy & Keen will ensure that those two will never stray from the path. We already see that with how they favour George. I’m sure they’ve all overheard some nasty stuff about Harry & Meghan to last them a lifetime. And of course they will believe it because they’re children.

      • Beverley says:

        You are so right. The Wales children have heard a lot of vitriol against the Sussexes and have seen a lot of rage and “pillow fighting”. I remember being frustrated when someone would comment how nice it would be for the Wales and Sussex children to interact as cousins. No! I have white cousins who parents disapproved of the Black marry-in and those cousins are ruthless racists. They abuse their mixed race cousins, call them racial slurs, and never mince their scathing words. And they are all under the age of 12.

        So no, the Wales children have already been exposed to bigotry and racial hatred towards Meghan and their Sussex cousins. They will likely extrapolate those feelings to other non-white people and perhaps continue the ongoing cycle of generations of racists. After all, the monarchy is the ultimate expression of the fallacy of white superiority.

        #AbolishTheMonarchy

    • Dee says:

      Charlotte will be steered toward horse jumping or art curating and Louis will end up in the military. They will have very limited choices.

      • LeonsMomma says:

        You are spot on. And I feel sorry for them (though if this actually what they want to do, so be it. Harry thrived in the military, though it is not for everyone.)

  14. Brassy Rebel says:

    So much truthful shade here. This “source” threw the Middletons under the bus, then backed the bus over them. Kate’s in big trouble. I wonder if she knows the clock is ticking.

    • Jaded says:

      I’m sure she knows the clock is ticking. The tabloids are tossing out bread crumbs that definitely lead to the fact that all is not well in the Wails’ marriage. The palace retaliates with dumb stories about Kate having to be with George as he takes this important exam to prep for Eton instead of accompanying William to Singapore. The “cozy cottage” scenario of them at Adelaide is ridiculous. Sure Kate and the kids are there but the kids have luxurious places at Windsor, KP and Anmer where they stay with dad. Adelaide is Kate’s separation home and a separation may be announced in the new year, the reason being something about “Kate is finding juggling 3 kids and royal duties too stressful and needs to concentrate on raising her family”.

  15. Mirage says:

    The question is, what do they live off now?
    Maybe they have a few investments, but I suspect that, unless the royal family support them financially, money is tight. And the upkeep of an expensive mansion is high.

    • Whatever says:

      That’s precisely what I was wondering. Even if they own their home outright, which I don’t know that they do, how are they covering its upkeep, taxes, plus their normal day to day expenses, which must still be massive? Like, how do they live?

      • Unblinkered says:

        Exactly, that’s what I’ve been saying.

        Possibly W is having to maintain its upkeep, emotional blackmail perhaps for when his children stay there – which may be a lot of the time. Charles, Camilla & Anne must be endlessly amused by it all having had to suffer the Middletons all these years.

      • Harper says:

        I think Kate is funneling them money (and grocery leftovers) from her allowance for Adelaide. CarolE probably suggested that Kate could wear a wig and save the cost of blowouts and cuts and color. That money is either going into Kate’s own nest egg or funding her parents’ lives. Thus, the current international wig crisis we are living through.

      • Lisa R says:

        I think you are right, Ma is leaning on Kate to give them her allowance. Nothing is left for hair and wardrobe. How bad must Kate’s hair be to need wigs? Extensions weaken the roots, etc.

        Most likely, the original plan was for William to have mistresses, the same as his forefathers, and call it a life. Unfortunately, Kate’s behavior became intolerable, the Middletons embarrassed them, Harry quit, and the pandemic stretched on longer than anyone predicted. If the Mids had just played nicely, they could have ridden the gravy train to the end.

        The question that remains is whether Buckleberry is held in a trust. Perhaps QE2 needed to approve William’s purchase despite the money being from Diana. If it is held in a trust, that can be used to prevent the Mids from selling their secrets.

    • Debbie says:

      I know nothing about these Middleton people, but I know crooks and grifters. One thing I know is that they may not officially have money to pay back the people they’ve cheated, but they always, ALWAYS, make sure they save some money for themselves and their lavish lifestyles. That’s just Thieving 101. Otherwise, why would they have bothered restructuring their company after it went broke (meaning, they could not sustain the grift any longer) but just before that fact became public knowledge? So, when you hear that they’ve never had as much money as was commonly thought, that doesn’t mean that they haven’t amassed a small fortune since they became royal-adjacent, and it certainly does not mean that they are now paupers — not even close. They have dough but now they cannot be seen to be rolling in it.

  16. Angelica+Schuyler says:

    I find it very interesting that William didn’t just cover his in-laws debts and help avoid all the negative press. Things are probably much worse than we imagine between him and Kate. There’s still something to be said for helping her family save face even if he doesn’t want to be with her any more. She’s still the mother of his children. (Can you imagine if Harry and Meg were dependent on William’s largesse for their funding? I’m so glad they’re out of there and financially independent.)

    Also, what about Uncle Gary? He can’t bail out his family? What about Pippa’s moderately wealthy husband? He couldn’t chip in a few pounds to save the family’s reputation? Things are looking really bad in Middleton-land…

    Maybe CarolE can go back to air-hostessing to make ends meet…

    • Robert Phillips says:

      I think Carole and Kate pissed off all the people who could possibly have bailed them out. I figure Pippa resents Kate and how Carole pushed them. So she won’t let her husband help out. William and the monarchy are pissed off because of all the stories Kate and Carol put out about how Kate was the lynchpin all those years. And I figure Uncle Gary is close to broke also. Having kept Carol up all those years, so she could party with Kate and the upper crust. Fly too close to the sun and you end up crashing.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Angelica & Schuyler, we’ve observed that Cant has been wearing less expensive clothes and her hair is a mess. Do you think it’s possible that she is using her ‘allowance’ to help fund Ma and Pa?

  17. Mary Pester says:

    Clean up in alley 5, middleton mess AGAIN!! 😂😂THEY are finished, finito, over, done. Bye bye Carol. You went to far didn’t you dear. You thought you were untouchable didn’t you dear, JUST LIKE YOUR DAUGHTER. Don’t you realise that NONE of you are. The only ones the Windsors defend and support, are the ones on the throne and the BORN INS never, ever the married Ins and their dodgy family! Now, go dry those eyes and ask uncle Gary for one of his “special” cigarettes
    And as for the Windsors supporting hard working people REALLY, other than Harry, Megan and their own PR office, do they actually know any!? And maybe they can (lie) explain, HOW and WHERE they have supported Harry, (or the veterans)

  18. s808 says:

    I wonder if the Palace is leaving the middletons out to dry on this situation in order to tie paying their debts into silence once Will and Katie divorce? Yes, legally they don’t owe it back but it’s not a good look for the maternal side of the future king. Carole is (rightfully) humiliated and probably wants this to go away. Just spitballing but I can see their silence being bought by squaring this debt away.

    • Lau says:

      I was going to say that taking down the Middletons would give William the opportunity to say that this story had put too much pressure on their marriage at some point.

    • Sunday says:

      What you said makes sense and I would agree with you, except this all playing out in public complete with 2 poster campaigns defeats the purpose of paying to make it go away, IMO. The cat’s already out of the bag, it’s like there was a deal but it fell through, hence all this being made public.

      What I don’t get is, between Pippa’s TMW husband, any reasoning with Will, any allowance or budgeting or scheming from Kate, any dog food money or whatever from James and his financier wife, and NOBODY could (or wanted to) put together £2.3 million to save the reputation of the future king’s grandmother? Really? They’re all letting the Middletons twist in the wind for an amount that *this* group of people should be able to pool together. The article even points out that the Middleton’s home is worth more than enough to cover their debts, and yet the Middletons seemingly would rather cling to their manor rather than their reputations. I just don’t get it.

      • lawyercat says:

        My thought is they don’t own it. It could be in William’s name.

      • Dot Gingell says:

        I think it’s possible they don’t actually own Muttonton Manor. Could have been bought by Peggy as a future separation home for Khate. They can’t sell up if he holds the title deeds.

  19. Miranda says:

    “The royals are meant to be inspirational for hard-working people…”

    F–KKKKKK YOUUUUUU.

  20. Ace says:

    Sure, they are so worried about Kate’s reputation they used the fact that she’s married to the future king* to assure people they would get paid when they knew their company was failing. How about selling everything they have to pay their creditors? That’d be a good way to protect Kate’s reputation. Except they aren’t doing that. Be it because they really don’t care about their debts or because they have nothing to sell.

    *conditions may vary

    • JT says:

      That’s what so interesting about this article in the first place. Kate being married to the future king is why all of those companies continued to extend credit to the Middletons, who weren’t paying their bills, in the first place. Carole and James have been enriching themselves off of Kate’s back and in turn, William’s, for decades. They’ve been using Kate’s royal connections since she was 18. Now they care how this bankruptcy is affecting Kate? Why now?

    • Cairidh says:

      Carole cares most about maintaining her image as rich and part of the club of upperclass people (as new money middle class, but still, mixing with the upperclass).

      So her priority would be keeping her Manor House, and anything else that makes her look the part. Maybe her son in laws chipped in to save her house, and pay for her to go to the Saudi wedding. And weren’t willing to pay off the debts as well.

  21. Tom Hall says:

    Well, well, well.

    The schadenfreude is thick with the Middletons. Let’s just stipulate that they were always “credit card” rich and not, as has been portrayed, “wealthy.” It’s not that they were poor, necessarily, but they are definitely not a part of the landed aristocratic gentry – unlike Rose Hanbury (AKA the Marchioness of Cholmondeley). Just sayin’.

    To borrow a phrase from Kaiser, Kate was “embiggened” from the start, and was groomed and set up in a $1.5 million “flat” in London with her sister to give a certain appearance – a sheen, if you will – of acceptability for her as the future wife of Bill. And, bonus, for any potential mates for Pippa. The strategy worked, since Pippa is worth *far more* now than her sister, since her husband is a billionaire.

    The question is: Why are these adult children not helping their parents, who literally bet the farm on their Austenian quest for these two wisteria sisters to marry well? It’s embarrassing all the way around.

    Meanwhile, Meghan and Harry continue to live outside the bubble. And good for them.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Tom Hall, I can’t help but think that Pippa and James are not helping because of their probable treatment by Kate and her Mother after the prize was attained. Pippa, particularly, has faded into the background and is living her life–good for her. James has had issues, for which he was in therapy. He might have understood that there were limitations on what his expectations should be from his parents. He is now married with a child and has his own family to care for and who care for him. I just can’t give up the idea that boats were burned and bridges were not built.

      • Appla says:

        You have to remember that Pippa’s father in law had serious rape allegations against him. Her husband is also co owner and CEO of a billion dollar fund and reputation is important…you don’t want investors to start moving money. Things not easy.

  22. MsIam says:

    Honestly when I saw the headline I thought for sure the other business was going to be that weed farm. That would definitely “embarrass” Kate. Anyway, why do I get the feeling that the other shoe has yet to drop in the tales of House Middleton? It’s clear the palace wants them out of the way for good. I’m sure they don’t want Carole playing her “grandmother of the future future king” card all over town, especially if Kate is being pushed out the door.

  23. Milady Digby says:

    Surely there can’t be another woman who plays the piano better or who freeze poses better and makes better chutney than Ma Midd’s oldest?

  24. HuffnPuff says:

    I think these stories are out there because the RF needs punching bags to detract from their own scandals and PR blunders. The Middletons will take this in order to get the fancy invites. It’s no different than what Kate signed on to. They really could publish W’s affairs and what could Kate do about it? Diana had family money to fall back on. Kate has nothing. Sure, she could write a lucrative tell all, but then she would be iced out which is not her goal. She’s not in this for love. She wants the crown and access to the jewelry and palaces. She will put up with anything. W married her just for that. He knows she doesn’t love him and he doesn’t love her. He just needed heirs and a wife. He is one upping his dad by finding one that can’t escape and has no desire to.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      HuffnPuff, I wonder if that’s still true? It could be that Kate wants the misery to end. I’m not saying that she definitely did everything she could to get the prize, but I have to wonder if she’s finally decided that the prize isn’t worth it.

      • HuffnPuff says:

        That’s true, Saucy&Sassy. As much as she has had to turn a blind eye to William’s behavior, it can’t be fun or healthy even if she is getting what she wants out of the relationship.

    • Cairidh says:

      He used to love her as a friend, but that seems to have changed. I don’t know whether she was madly in love with him or not. I’m sure she would have stalked and seduced whoever was the Future Prince of Wales, and it was the title she was desparate for….. but maybe she did fall in love with him along the way.

  25. Rea says:

    I want to hire however writes these pieces for the royal family to write my resume they would work magic.
    “The Windsor name took a minor dent when Party Pieces…”
    This is very iconic and a total down play of what actually happened= brilliant.

  26. kelleybelle says:

    Kate’s reputation? LOL Kate Middlebum? Who flashed her bare arse at all the boys in university? Who William’s POs named “The Mattress?” because he’d brag about having sex waiting for him after the drinking benders with his mates? I will never stop laughing. I’m still waiting for Dickie Arbiter to explain how exactly she’s an “asset to the monarchy.”

  27. FashionMaven says:

    Just had a thought. Someone else above said that Kate wouldn’t go quietly if W wanted to divorce. What if W promises to pay off the Middleton debt and keep them well paid so K DOES go quietly?

    All these articles feel like the humiliation is being piled on thick for the Middletons. Maybe to push them all to the point where in order to escape but “stay under the royal tent”, K has to go quietly. Even if divorced she’d still be the King Mother once G is crowned.

    I dunno. This is all fascinating to watch go down though.