King Charles was astonished when multiple guests wore Crocs at a palace event

Y’all know that I’m always up for hating on King Charles, but every so often, I have to acknowledge that he’s done some cool things. Twenty-five years ago, Charles co-founded the Royal Drawing School, a charity which provides drawing/art classes for children and adults of all ages and abilities. It also offers what amounts to fellowships and “graduate degrees” for artists. Like… that’s really cool. Charles is an artist too, he paints and draws, and he’s always donated his paintings for various charity auctions. Anyway, on Tuesday, Charles hosted a reception for the charity and he was stunned when several artists turned up to St. James’s Palace in CROCS!

King Charles was left visibly stunned as multiple guests arrived at St James’s Palace wearing Crocs for a reception this evening.

The King and Queen Camilla welcomed distinguished artists and creative figures to St James’s Palace for a special celebration marking the Royal Drawing School’s 25th anniversary. The King serves as Founding Patron of the institution.

King Charles, 76, looked amused as he spoke to Tracey Emin and Grayson Perry, who were both wearing Crocs.

He joined the Queen at the reception alongside celebrated alumni and supporters of the school. The royal couple toured a specially curated anniversary exhibition titled “The Power of Drawing: Marking 25 Years of the Royal Drawing School”. It showcased artwork from 50 prominent artists and former students spanning the school’s quarter-century history.

[From GB News]

It’s hysterical that two or more people turned up in Crocs. Much respect! If anyone was going to disregard the dress-code rules of palace receptions, it would be the arts community. For what it’s worth, Charles was probably more like “mildly surprised” by the Crocs, but he just got on with it. He actually seemed really pleased to be among artists and art-school graduates. This is such a cool thing he did, founding this charity. I wonder why his art-history-major daughter-in-law never thought to work with this charity??

Charles’s face when he sees a pair of Crocs:

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

26 Responses to “King Charles was astonished when multiple guests wore Crocs at a palace event”

  1. sunnyside up says:

    Turning up in Crocs. good for them.

  2. SummerMoomin says:

    Yes I am very much NOT a fan of Charles, but I think he can fairly claim to be the most consequential Prince of Wales ever. Normally Princes of Wales are like William, nasty little schemers off in their corner getting drunk and picking roses. Now Charles did his share of scheming, drinking and rose plucking but he also took a real interest in the life of the nation, I know multiple people who were helped get their start by the Prince’s Trust, or one of his other organizations. Of course, since he’s Charles all this has a downside, his constant meddling in affairs of states are notorious, and then there is the open corruption he used to become unbelievably wealthy. And he was a terrible father. But he was a good Prince of Wales and I don’t know when we will see his like again. I suppose it depends how George turns out, George is likely to have a long turn at Prince of Wales, though not as long as his grandfather’s.

    • Tessa says:

      Charles broke his own home. He ousted his wife and never really put any effort into the first marriage, except getting the heir and spare from the aristo wife. He’s a bad parent and grandparent. He also is very egocentric. And easily upset over pens, etc. I am not holding up hope for George considering his parents and he must hear their conversations about Harry and Meghan. The only plus side for Charles is that he is not lazy about work. But William is and he has plenty of flaws also.

      • Lawrenceville says:

        I’m with you on this @Tessa. Charles could be the founder of all those charities, and I still don’t care. He is a despicable horrendous man that treats everyone around him horribly. Well, everyone except his horseface of a side piece Camilla. And he is a thief, steals from the poor to enrich himself. All the money that founded those charities is stolen money. That man Charles is a hideous person regardless of all the charities he founded.

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      Charles is a dogsht father and husband, but he did do great things and some projects he really is passionate about, like gardening.
      My comment is on why lazy Katie never thought to work with this art foundation: charles knows she is lazy and would ruin his work and efforts. She is not genuine about being patron to any organization, she just doesn’t have a deep care for issues. Wimbledon she does to be able to watch the tournament. Her early years is just something-something to furnish some make-believe work tume, because she has kids. It fits the narrative. Watch it go away once her kids are older. The girl loves vacation, skiing, spas and shopping/dressing up for her down time.

  3. Blogger says:

    Is that Tracey in the black? Her shopping bag is also an interesting choice.

  4. Me at home says:

    “Mildly surprised” is probably right, not horrified. Charles is having a busy week—Zelenskyy on Monday and this yesterday. And in both meetings the absences were weird—global statesman Bullam not at the Zelenskyy meeting and art history student Kate not at this. Either Charles didn’t ask them, or one or both said no, and neither is a great look.

  5. Margaret says:

    What a hoot! I suspect Charles had a good chuckle about it. Camilla was probably wishing she could wear crocs.

  6. MSJ says:

    Charles’ wife was walking around barefoot in her fineries on tour last year in Australia. Photos are out there of Charles fetching Camilla’s stilettos as she maneuvered herself into/out of (can’t remember) a vehicle in her fancy dress at a black tie event.

    I don’t think Charles was astonished by artists wearing crocs at an art exhibition at St. James Palace. It’s probably the reporter that was astonished. 😂

    • Lorelei says:

      She was seen walking around barefoot on a freaking royal tour?? Just imagine the headlines Meghan would have gotten if she’d pulled such a tacky stunt.

    • BeanieBean says:

      I agree with you, @MSJ. The line from the article is, ‘King Charles, 76, looked amused as he spoke to Tracey Emin and Grayson Perry, who were both wearing Crocs.’ The ‘both wearing Crocs’ seems to be an observation by the ‘journalist’. Maybe he was amused by the conversation? Unless he’s photographed pointing down at their feet with everybody looking down, I don’t think their footwear made any kind of impact on him.

      Now, if Keen shows up in Crocs at next year’s Ascot–given how everybody made such a big deal about her absence this year–then that’ll be something all right. Let’s see if he notices someone’s footwear then. I still bet it’s the reporters’ who are all up in arms about it. They didn’t even mention Camilla’s shiny gold slippers.

  7. 😂😂They are artists and they are free spirits who do as they please and they don’t always want to please others. No big deal.

  8. jais says:

    okay, this is a cute story. I still don’t own a pair of crocs but it is basically the only shoes my nieces and nephews ever wear in the summer. Currently with paw patrol charms. Meghan wore a cute pair of cognac croc slides that I would have worn had they not sold out.

  9. Becks1 says:

    I honestly dont think charles cared? The crocs look appropriate with the outfit. And camilla appears to be wearing some sort of sensible wedged loafer or the like, she’s not teetering around in heels all night either.

  10. Vicki says:

    Well, his consort goes braless, so….

  11. Amy Bee says:

    This is what the royal press has come to? Was the actually event uninteresting?

  12. Steph says:

    I always forget that Harry is an artist as well. I didn’t realize he got it from his father.

    That being said, Kate would never have been there. Charles doesn’t share any of his foundations with his children or in laws.

  13. Mslove says:

    Maybe someone could get Chuck a pair of crocs with little crowns on them. He can wear them while foraging for mushrooms.

  14. QuiteContrary says:

    My husband would wear Crocs everywhere if I let him get away with it. Our daughters sigh theatrically every time he wears them, but I get it: They’re comfy as hell.

    Anyway, kudos to Kaiser for giving credit to Charles for this charity. I couldn’t do it. I loathe that self-centered, pampered, prickly monster.

  15. Constance says:

    If true, it’s one time I agree with the old fool…I loathe those shoes in all of their variants…

    • Lauren says:

      I have always disliked the shoes as well, but recently end up buying a pair for when I’m working in the wooded area of our property during the summer. I needed something that had more airflow the my boots but still protected my feet from all the itchy weeds. There as easy to put on as flip flops and I don’t have to worry about getting them muddy, I couldn’t thing of a better option opfor this use case

  16. Lizzie says:

    QEII would never let on to someone that she found anything remarkable about their clothing. Very tacky indeed. Either send them a dress code or realize some people’s feet hurt so they wear comfortable shoes, as most of us cannot just stay home to find the ‘right balance’.

  17. Kittenmom says:

    I’m all about the comfort shoe. Crocs are awesome. If i should ever find myself touring in the UK I will make sure to wear a bright yellow pair while touring any royal property.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment