Prince Andrew to Jeffrey Epstein in 2011: ‘We’ll play some more soon!’

Last month, we learned that Sarah Ferguson sent an email apology to Jeffrey Epstein in 2011. The apology, which was full of warmth and flattery, was sent after Epstein threatened to sue Fergie after she publicly “cut ties” with him, which happened after she was exposed for taking money from Epstein. The email was new-to-us, but people who have followed the story of the Yorks’ attachments to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell know that Fergie and Prince Andrew were still in contact for years after Epstein’s initial plea deal for sexually abusing minors. Well, something else happened in 2011 – Andrew sent Epstein an email after the publication of the photo of Andrew, Virginia Guiffre and Ghislaine (seen above).

Prince Andrew secretly told paedophile Jeffrey Epstein ‘we are in this together’ a day after The Mail on Sunday first published the infamous picture of the Duke with his alleged teenage sex victim, a bombshell email reveals. In the astonishing message, Andrew said he was ‘concerned’ about the impact this newspaper’s revelations would have on his friend, but reassured the vile billionaire that the pair would ‘rise above’ press scrutiny. It was sent to Epstein 12 weeks after Andrew had supposedly ceased all contact with the convicted sex offender.

The leaked email provides definitive proof that the Duke lied in his interview with BBC’s Newsnight when he claimed he ‘never had any contact’ with Epstein after the pair were famously pictured walking together in New York’s Central Park in December 2010.

The revelation comes just weeks after the MoS exposed how the Duchess of York wrote Epstein a gushing message calling him her ‘supreme friend’ – despite telling journalists she would never have anything to do with him again. The hugely embarrassing email will heap further pressure on the Royal Family to sever all ties with the disgraced Yorks and raise fresh questions about their future at Royal Lodge, a 30-room mansion in Windsor Great Park.

Writing to Epstein on February 28, 2011 – the day after the MoS published the now infamous picture of him with a teenage Virginia Giuffre that led to his downfall – Andrew said: ‘I’m just as concerned for you! Don’t worry about me! It would seem we are in this together and will have to rise above it. Otherwise keep in close touch and we’ll play some more soon!!!!’

Andrew signed off with: ‘A, HRH The Duke of York, KG’. KG refers to Duke’s ‘Knight of the Garter’ – a prestigious position he has held since 2006 and which he still retains.

The MoS has verified the email address used by Andrew, while Epstein’s email address has repeatedly appeared in court documents. Prince Andrew last night declined to comment.

[From The Daily Mail]

“It would seem we are in this together” – I mean, he is correct, they were in it together, they were abusing girls and women together, they were absolutely birds of a feather. “Otherwise keep in close touch and we’ll play some more soon.” In 2011?? Yeah, Andrew and Epstein were still in touch long after Andrew allegedly “cut ties.” Which means he was lying his ass off in that Emily Maitlis interview in 2019. The Mail’s A.N. Wilson – who recently did that “What’s Eating Prince William” piece – spelled out how screwed the Windsors are about this, arguing that even though everyone knows that the Yorks need to be completely cut off, the biggest fear is what happens if Andrew decides to write a book.

So now, the questions that the Palace, and the King, have long tried to avoid are growing louder with each leaked email. When will they actually send Andrew packing? When will the King, who is his brother’s landlord, say that he and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson simply cannot go on living in Royal Lodge, a 30-room mansion in Windsor Great Park? That they cannot attend royal funerals? That they are not to be lined up with the Royals for church services, Garter ceremonies or anything else? That they are out, completely out?

But royal exile for the Duke could invite even greater problems for the King. The fear is that, untethered from royal protocol, Andrew will become the loosest of loose cannons and his broadsides will splinter the entire Monarchy. For a start, he would need to find an income to fund his lavish lifestyle. Fergie, who has enlisted the help of many a poorly-paid ghostwriter to pen her ludicrously bad children’s books, will no doubt advise Andrew to sign a book deal.

Any publisher would lick their lips at the vault of Windsor secrets he could open, and pay handsomely for it. But they would backpedal fast if Andrew continued to deny any involvement with the Epstein crowd. The only book deal that would be credible is one in which he reveals as much about himself as he does his family, think: Confessions Of A Sex Addict Prince. The Palace must hope that he would not agree to such a memoir as it would be tantamount to admitting criminal offences. However many millions he was offered to write it, he and Fergie would get through the money in next to no time.

So the pair would have to beg for handouts from monied friends, be they paedophile financiers, oligarchs from the ex-Soviet ‘stans or Chinese spies. So this is a real problem, and not only for the immediate family. It is a major crisis for the Monarchy, perhaps the gravest since the abdication of Edward VIII in 1936.

The King and the Prince of Wales cannot be seen to support or underwrite Andrew any more. His very existence as an official Royal is a scandal. So they must cast him out, for if they show him mercy, they are themselves implicated, and we are only a hair’s breadth away from a republic.

[From The Daily Mail]

So the argument is… even though Andrew has the power to completely blow up the Windsors and expose a lot of secrets, the Windsors should still completely cast him aside? Interesting. I still don’t think Charles will do that, but it will happen when William is Scooter King.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

39 Responses to “Prince Andrew to Jeffrey Epstein in 2011: ‘We’ll play some more soon!’”

  1. “We will play together more soon”? The plot thickens and OMG I want to vomit. There have been stories that what’s in those files are worse than anything anyone has ever imagined!!

  2. Lili says:

    Why are they piece mealing this information, who does in benefit?

    • Eurydice says:

      I think these leaks are coming piece meal.

    • wendy says:

      Andrew is the known quantity – if they can keep throwing his name out there, it deflects from the unknowns. He is trash, but I have long thought that he has been made the ‘face’ of the issue because he is untouchable legally. At least thus far.

  3. Tessa says:

    I think scooter prince will not.do anything about andrew.

    • Smatone99 says:

      I agree he knows plenty about scooter. That family are nothing but rich, lazy gossips. Their entire ecosystem is gossip for money.

      • Smart&Messy says:

        This part is so crazy. The royalists are basicly saying that the Windsors do or have done ubspeakable things and reveaing the truth about them is the worst thing that can happen, they must be protected because omg the monarchy. They are taxpayer funded diplomats, heads of state, representatives of the country. They keep looting the coffers every chance they get to grab even mote! And one must by all means participate in concealing their shady (possibly criminal) dealings?? Why??

      • DK says:

        @Smart&Messy, this is what I don’t get either.
        If the Windsor secrets are worse than:
        1) being a sex trafficking, pedophile rapist and
        2) covering up for and protecting a sex trafficking, pedophile rapist (because if Andrew knows the dirt on everyone else, they know the dirt on him and they are all. protecting. him.)
        …then, maybe they don’t deserve to be supported by tax payers?

        Take away their thrones, take away their duchies, and let them live like the gross evil they are.

  4. Eurydice says:

    Ok, yuck, I’m having breakfast here. Then, yikes, yikes, yikes. And finally, I thought Harry was the gravest crisis for the monarchy since Edward VIII. How is he looking to you all now?

    • DK says:

      I feel like this story at least explains to me why Andrew thought that 2019 interview was a success when it was clear to the rest of the world it was a disaster and he was full of sh**.

      Apparently bc he was even MORE full of sh** and he did at least manage to cover up the full extent to which he and Epstein and Maxwell continued to be besties well past when he lied and said he’d cut ties.

  5. SURE says:

    A’s a liar. I’d be sceptical of anything he had to say even in a tell-all memoir.

    • Smatone99 says:

      He knows a lot of muck because that family is 95% muck. However he’s the worst in the current batch. Also many more prominent members of the establishment were involved with Epstein. He’s just one. He knows everything about pegs and Kate.

      If Andy wants a tell all book, all the king (whomever) needs to do is pull his security and let him have an unfortunate accident. Not like they haven’t done it before.

      • Libra says:

        Being tossed and kicked by a horse? Such an unpredictable accident. Wouldn’t even need to pull security. By the way, where was Anne’s security person when she was found unconscious in her estate grounds?

      • bisynaptic says:

        If he’s smart, the book has already been written and dispersed in several different vaults.

      • Tuesday says:

        @Bysnaptic… He’s not smart. Lol.

      • Smart&Messy says:

        @Tuesday
        But he is HRH and KG!! Hahha he uses it like it was a universally known achievement like PhD or MD.

    • Betsy says:

      He’s a liar to protect himself; I bet he’d be happy to spill the beans in granular and accurate detail about literally anyone else he could burn on the way down.

      My guess is he knows more about Charles and William; it’s not like they care much about protecting the rest of the royals, so it would have to be the most big ticket names.

  6. Pretty says:

    I don’t even think he has to vacate his home. Simply don’t appear in public with the family. If since stepping back from working royal we’ve only seen him riding horses and hearing about his hunting habits it wouldn’t be an issue. But the queen made sure to be seen with him. And Charles continued to invite him to public church services regularly. Like why is he being seen on Easter service and at the funeral of a duchess the public never cared about.

    • Eurydice says:

      It doesn’t matter if they keep Andrew even more in the background. More and more bits of his slimy past will keep surfacing. I think the only solution is if he drops dead of a sudden and unexplained heart attack.

  7. Hypocrisy says:

    And what is glaringly obvious is that the pedo Prince has been protected from day one by his parent (lizzy) and his brother (Chuck) still to this day the pedo has security and a royal lease, while Prince Harry was vilified and abused by his parent and brother and lost his security and lease and is once again having to jump through hoops not to be injured or killed on British soil.

  8. AtAngie says:

    I believe they all are aware what PA did but are hoping none of it comes out. In a way they all are complicit because they don’t want the truth to come out because it would be damaging to the monarchy. Do people really believe that his daughters don’t know about what their parents were doing with Epstein. Beatrice was involved with the interview he did. Both of his daughters should be removed from any charities involving children or women. People are trying to absolve them but I believe they know a lot more of what happened with their parents and Epstein .

    • Hypocrisy says:

      Oh they absolutely know what happened and covered it up.. especially the Queen and Chuck and their minions know everything. If the Yorks and Peggy didn’t to begin with there is no denying it now, but I’m sure they all knew long before Epstein was convicted.

    • sevenblue says:

      There is no way BRF didn’t know about his every move. He was travelling everywhere with his royal security. They would report everything back to UK. They are covering up, because Andrew isn’t the only one in their circle who committed these crimes. The british ambassador said to Epstein if he was in UK, he wouldn’t get punished for his crimes.

    • beautifully broken says:

      The Royal family knew. But Andrew could speak about Lord Mountbatten, Jimmy Saville, and the pedo church member that Charles all palled around with. It appears that royal men can do what they want with the peasants.

  9. Jais says:

    Ew. What a lying liar. Which we knew but still. The Andrew problem isn’t going away for them. Oh well.

  10. Amy Bee says:

    The press being shocked that Andrew remained friends with Esptein and that he lied to Emily Mathlis is performative. They’ve known all along and I suspect the reason why they never attacked Andrew in the same way they did Harry is because he is probably one of their sources.

  11. Brassy Rebel says:

    “…and we are only a hair’s breadth away from a republic.” From the DM’s mouth to God’s ear. 🙏 May they never “cast him out”!

    • FAFO says:

      Ikr? I lol’d at that too.
      Like becoming a republic is the worst thing possible.
      Welcome to the real world, you elitist, colonizing snobs.

  12. Mslove says:

    What does “casting out” the pedo involve? Forcing him to stay in Frogmore Cottage? Sneaking him into church through the back door? Chuck has been harboring the Pedo for years; he isn’t gonna stop now.

  13. QuiteContrary says:

    The exclamation points after the phrase “and we’ll play some more soon!!!!” speak volumes — this disgusting and entitled pedo really had no qualms about abusing trafficking victims. He reveled in it.

    He should lose his royal home and his Garter affiliation and all invitations to any royal gathering. We all know that Charles is comfortable with pedos, but he’s going to need to demonstrate disgust, even if he doesn’t really feel it.

  14. kelleybelle says:

    Let us remember Epstein’s words on Andrew: “He’s an idiot. A useful idiot, but an idiot nonetheless.”

  15. bisynaptic says:

    “Play”? Is that what they called it? 🤢

    It’s hilarious what an open secret it is that the Windsors have such skeletons in their closet, that the public would throw them out, if the public only were to know about the secrets.

  16. Linney says:

    I agree with the other posters who are nauseated by the word “play.” So many lives were ruined and yet this is fun? Andrew, the father of two daughters, makes me absolutely sick.

  17. CM says:

    Yet again, Thank God H&M are out of there. I feel badly for the York Princesses. None of this is their fault, and they love their parents.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment