Andrew Mountbatten Windsor & Sarah Ferguson will finally live separately now?

We are witnessing some really strange royal history at the moment. A dying king, an illiterate heir, an exiled spare, and a degenerate pervert prince who is no longer a prince. On Thursday, October 30, King Charles announced that the degenerate formerly known as Prince Andrew will be stripped of ALL of his titles and honors, and will now go by Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. Andrew’s ex-wife remains Sarah Ferguson – she’s always used her maiden name, and now it’s official. Charles is also formally kicking Andrew and Sarah out of Royal Lodge, and the palace confirmed that Andrew will be sent to Sandringham. Many assume that means Andrew will live in Wood Farm or one of the smaller homes on the Sandringham estate. At first, there was no mention of Sarah, and it looks like whatever deal was struck, it involved Sarah living separately from Andrew. Additionally, Eugenie and Beatrice remain princesses. From the BBC’s many updates:

*Andrew “is understood not to have objected to the King’s decision to remove his titles. The decision was made, and action taken, due to serious lapses in Andrew’s judgement, it is understood. Andrew continues to deny the accusations against him. It is also understood that the government was consulted – it made clear it supports the decision.”

*Andrew’s place in the line of succession remains unchanged. While stripped of titles and a mansion, he is still eighth in line to the throne.

*Andrew will move out of Royal Lodge soonish. Per the BBC: “Andrew has received formal notice to surrender the lease on his Windsor mansion, Royal Lodge. The move is set to take place as soon as it is practicable, it is understood.” The palace also confirmed that Charles will “privately fund” Andrew’s new life in Norfolk.

*Beatrice & Eugenie still have their titles, and that’s being called a “small victory” for Andrew, who likely folded that caveat into this deal.

*Per the BBC, “It is understood that Sarah Ferguson, Andrew’s ex-wife, will also move out of Royal Lodge and will make her own living arrangements.”

*A statement from Virginia Giuffre’s family, via her brother Skye Roberts: “Today, an ordinary American girl from an ordinary American family, brought down a British prince with her truth and extraordinary courage. Virginia Roberts Giuffre, our sister, a child when she was sexually assaulted by Andrew, never stopped fighting for accountability for what had happened to her and to countless other survivors like her. Today, she declares victory. We, her family, along with her survivor sisters, continue Virginia’s battle and will not rest until the same accountability applies to all of the abusers and abettors connected to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.”

[From BBC]

So, Fergie and Andrew are absolutely going to live separately now? That’s interesting, because Sarah and Andrew’s side was laying it on thick this week about how Sarah had nowhere to go and she needed the royals to take care of her. I wonder if Beatrice and Eugenie will be expected to either take in Fergie or finance a new living arrangement for her. Skye Roberts’ statement is really powerful, and I’m glad Virginia’s family spoke out today. Virginia is getting some kind of justice from beyond the grave.

In case you’re wondering about how, rather suddenly, Charles can remove all of Andrew’s titles, People Magazine included this in their coverage: “PEOPLE understands it was King Charles’ decision to remove Andrew’s titles and honors, and he is using his Royal Prerogative, which allows him to manage certain royal titles and honors without involving Parliament.” So… Charles could have done that this whole time?? Why didn’t he do this three years ago? Why did he spend all of that time and effort trying to bring Andrew in from the cold?

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

24 Responses to “Andrew Mountbatten Windsor & Sarah Ferguson will finally live separately now?”

  1. Tessa says:

    Charles used Andrew and fergie to spite harry and Meghan see they are in the fold and you are not thought Charles about the sussexes. Scooter was friends with uncle andrew

    • MSJ says:

      The Windsors are corrupt deviants. Follow the money. This is an establishment coverup. They want their corrupt financial dealings (Crown Estate, Duchy of Lancaster, Duchy of Cornwall, Sovereign Grant) to remain opaque.

      The family/institution is a toxic, dysfunctional ‘mafia’ operation. It’s why they ‘hate’ Prince Harry for leaving and speaking about how the sausage is made (the links, via the courtiers, between the family and the media as well as between the family and RAVEC).

      The further distance the Sussexes put between them and the Windsors, the better off they are. As Harry said, he has a clear conscience about everything he has done. This current Windsor saga further cements the fact that he made the right choice to leave and eventually move to the USA with his young family.

  2. BASH says:

    They will probably move to the Middle East at some point, like the disgraced former Spanish king.

    • Tessa says:

      I don’t think fergie will go with him anywhere now. They can still have family gatherings with their daughters

    • Hypocrisy says:

      I would bet you anything Chuck gave Fergie a cash payout to go away.. the Middle East would be my guess also.

    • PunkyMomma says:

      I concur. Andrew is still a pedo and won’t give up debauchery. Fergie still needs to grift. They both lead lavish lifestyles. Dubai is the perfect place for those two to set up their, er, cleaning and “secrets-for-sale” empire.

      • Visa Diva says:

        This is why I want Andrew to stay in the UK if he isn’t in jail. I don’t want him anyplace where he can have easy access to girls and young women.

    • Paisley25 says:

      The former King of Spain is worth billions, so it’s easy for him to live it up in the Middle East. Andrew will have to be dependent on others.

  3. He did it now because the public is furious with what the book Virginia wrote is saying. Three years ago a fake investigation was done to appease the public and a lot of them accepted it. Now with the Epstein files being a world wide topic because of trump and Virginias book coming out the public is being very vocal and it is even more unhappy with the monarchy. So here we are!! As for Fergie she will find someplace to land .

  4. Dee(2) says:

    He didn’t do it 3 years ago because ultimately they just wanted the problem to go away, they didn’t care about justice. Also, I think that there was a little bit of needling towards Harry in a lot of their decisions. See, Harry if you just keep your mouth shut and don’t speak out about what we do in house , you could have this too.

    They don’t need for the Epstein files or any emails to be released, they already know what he’s done. They know what they’ve done, they’re more worried about the public finally being aware of it. That’s always their motivation, their perception, their PR. Not the actual impact that their actions have on any of the people that aren’t them.

    • Tis True, Tis True says:

      This. If Andrew had given up Royal Lodge, gone to live in Norfolk and stayed in the background at family events instead of pushing his way to the front, he’d still have his titles now. It’s his continually refusing to accept any sort of consequences and maintain every bit of his previous life that brought us to this moment.

      And the fact that there have been zero consequences for any of Epstein’s other “clients” does make me see why he’s angry. They all should have their lives ruined. I’m totally OK with him getting the public anger all of them should be facing. Bring on the Epstein Files and let’s have a go at the rest of them.

  5. Amy Bee says:

    Charles didn’t move faster because he believed in Andrew’s innocence and valued his loyalty to the Royal Family. He finally “stripped” Andrew of his titles because people started to ask questions about the other family members’ housing arrangements. The Palace had to put a stop that scrutiny.

    • Ace says:

      It’s this.

      Once people started talking about reviews of the Crown States rental agreements, Andrew was doomed. They are perfectly okay with abusing children, but having the public looking into their finances it’s not allowed.

  6. Meme says:

    Simple, Andrew needed to keep Fergie on side to stop his secrets coming out. They’re all either out now or his reputation is so low it can’t fall further, so he no longer needs her silence. He can cast her off.

  7. Kbs says:

    I’m wondering about the Queen’s corgis. Sarah got them after QEII died. Where will they live?? In a smaller way, it’s a way to make $.

  8. Jais says:

    The whole royal prerogative thing is wild. Truly. Had never heard of it before now. Had anyone?

  9. Lili says:

    I have a big question, Is he reformed? Did he stop having ex with underage girls because one pipeline was closed, the Pegging stories came out of norfolk, so what is to say he now has more freedom to do what he wants where he is now, we’ve heard of 80yrs olds having kids recently and we can kind of guess it wasnt through IVF.

  10. LADY DIGBY says:

    What sticks in my craw is the way Andrew has been protected, coddled, included and had money. security and accommodation lavished on him but the King’s own son hasn’t! How can Charles as King, father, FIL, grandfather and Head of CE justify his treatment of hia son, DIL and two small grandchildren?

    • molly says:

      Because Charles can’t be anything other than the Prince of Wales and now King. It’s always been about the “duty” of the crown to him, above all else. There are anecdotes out there that suggest he TRIES to be a decent father/FIL/grandpa from time to time, but in the end, he’s just not equipped with any of those skills or cares enough about that side of his life.

      It’s sad, really, that the most important part of the monarchy is creating heirs when it’s fundamentally a cycle of emotionally stunted people who should definitely not be parents.

  11. fwiw says:

    Couldn’t Fergie’s “own living arrangements” that she has to make be in Andrew’s new home, if she talks him into it?

    • BeanieBean says:

      I would guess yes, but they made it clear that Charles would be financing Andrew’s living expenses, no mention of Sarah. So maybe not.

  12. Sarah says:

    Fundamentally, Charles didn’t want to remove the titles because it makes it clear that royal titles can be removed. That they are a privilege not a “birthright”.

    If they can be removed from Andrew, they can be taken from the lot of them.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment