The Beckhams won’t reconcile with Brooklyn ‘unless Nicola is out of the picture’

This is such an old-school People Magazine cover story, full of gossip, drama and two different camps who are eager to talk. I’m glad People went back to their roots for the Beckham family drama!! Two Mondays ago, Brooklyn Beckham posted his lengthy statement in his IG Stories, detailing his estrangement from his parents and the reasons why he’s cut off contact. He feels like his parents have gone out of their way to treat his wife Nicola like sh-t, and he feels like they tried to ruin his 2022 wedding. Brooklyn also feels as if his parents have been too eager to trash him publicly, especially in the British tabloids. On Victoria and David’s side, it’s more convoluted, and it basically boils down to “they don’t know why Brooklyn is acting like this when he could just divorce his wife and come running back to them.” Yeah. Well, some highlights from this excellent People Mag cover story:

Brooklyn believes his parents are responsible for all of these terrible stories: A Brooklyn source says the reason he did so is because he and Nicola, 31, believe that David, 50, and Victoria, 51, are personally behind all the bad press he and his wife have received over the last several years. “They are so beaten down,” says a Brooklyn source. In his shocking social media post, Brooklyn insisted that he has “received endless attacks from my parents, both privately and publicly, that were sent to the press on their orders.” (Reps for David and Victoria declined to comment to PEOPLE.)

David & Victoria’s reaction to Brooklyn’s IG statement: Sources tell People that David and Victoria were stunned and saddened by the public rant. “They are staying quiet because they don’t want to draw more attention to it,” a source says of the pair. Though they’re stinging from their son’s strong words, “David and Victoria love Brooklyn and are afraid of losing their son,” insists another insider. “They would take him back in a minute.”

David & Victoria want Nicola out of the picture: Multiple Brooklyn and Nicola sources say that same invitation does not seem to be extended to Nicola. “The Beckhams have no intention of reconciling with their son unless Nicola is out of the picture,” says a source familiar with the situation. “But that’s not an ultimatum he’s going to cave on. Brooklyn has felt more support from his wife in these past three years than from his parents in his entire life.”

Nicola and Victoria’s beef: Insiders say the hostility between the Beckhams and their daughter-in-law goes far beyond a dress and ruined dance. “Victoria and Nicola got along in the first few months, but then Victoria started acting like a jealous girlfriend,” a Peltz family source says. “She seemed so jealous of Nicola.” Not so, counters a Beckham insider: “Nicola is the one who is jealous of Victoria. She wants to be famous.”

The issue over Victoria not designing Nicola’s wedding dress: Another source says Nicola was always meant to wear two dresses.

Peltz vs. Beckham: Multiple sources say the Beckhams and Peltzes never meshed. “Their families are so different,” a Peltz source says, who adds that the ultra-wealthy—and private—family can’t relate to the Beckhams’ life of extreme fame. David and Victoria have long happily lived in the spotlight—David as one of the most successful soccer players of all time, and Victoria, who found mega fame in the ‘90s as a Spice Girl before turning to clothing design—and are “very strategic about everything they do because they are basically a billion-dollar corporation,” the Beckham source says. Adds another insider: “They have to be strategic and smart about moves they make.” Even now, they have no regrets about how they raised their kids. Says the source: “They always supported Brooklyn in everything.”

Brooklyn’s name: Brooklyn wrote, “Weeks before our big day, my parents repeatedly pressured and attempted to bribe me into signing away the rights to my name which would have affected me, my wife, and our future children,” he wrote. “My holdout affected the payday and they have never treated me the same since.” Records from the U.K.’s Intellectual Property Office show that Victoria owns the trademarks on the names of all four of her children, including for Brooklyn’s siblings Romeo, 23, Cruz, 20, and Harper, 14. But a source close to the family insists the situation is a “misunderstanding,” explaining Victoria obtained them when her children were minors and unable to file for themselves.

D&V believe Brooklyn will come back: Though Brooklyn has firmly drawn a line in the sand, “David and Victoria believe that over time Brooklyn will come back,” says a family source. “But they can’t do anything until then.”

[From People]

Even in pro-Victoria quotes, Victoria comes across as completely unhinged, my god. This is your son’s wife of nearly four years. Nicola might be a vapid billionaire’s daughter, but she’s not the devil and she really hasn’t done anything to merit Victoria and David publicly positioning the situation in this way: “The Beckhams have no intention of reconciling with their son unless Nicola is out of the picture.” Controlling, smothering, refusing to acknowledge that their 26-year-old son is an adult who can make his own decisions. And all of this is SUPER messy: “…But then Victoria started acting like a jealous girlfriend,” a Peltz family source says. “She seemed so jealous of Nicola.” Not so, counters a Beckham insider: “Nicola is the one who is jealous of Victoria. She wants to be famous.” You guys…what in the Freudian nonsense is this???


.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid. Covers courtesy of People and British Vogue.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

55 Responses to “The Beckhams won’t reconcile with Brooklyn ‘unless Nicola is out of the picture’”

  1. seraphina says:

    What mother asks her child to sign away their name to them???? And the statement that they have no intention to reconcile unless she is out of the picture says it all for me as to what type of parents they are.
    And my fear is that they use their money to control the kids. As soon as Brooklyn found a wife with more money, he escaped. I hope I am wrong.
    As the saying goes, all children deserve parents but not all parents deserve children.

    • Chica says:

      @Seraphina .. The name thing is involved in trusts. These are very rich folks with lots ag $$ involved. It’s rare that the married in get access to generational long family trust. I bet it’s the same for Brooklyn prenup with Nicola, the only difference is her family’s name is not part of the “ trust brand” . Think generic vs Coca Cola. Not a defense of either side, but some of this is simply business and legalities involving very rich folks.

  2. Tessa says:

    Another reason why I am glad I don’t buy people magazine

    • L Williams says:

      True but the money is on the Peltz side they are richer. That why Victoria revealed that Brooklin signed prenup where he would get nothing. The Peltz family has five sons who where educated at NYU and Yale in business, finance and tech. They have started successfully businesses and when it comes time that father knows his wealth that he worked hard for will be handled properly. While on the Beckham side you have Victoria whose fashion company is over 60 million in debt. And none of her son’s(,her daughter is too young) have a advanced college degree. Then you have the issue of the Beckham’s trademarking Brooklin name when he was a child and not wanting to hand over that trademark now that he is a adult.

  3. Tessa says:

    Out of the, picture. They are talking about their daughter in law. This is making the parents petty and vindictive

  4. MY3CENTS says:

    These people seem to share the same publicist as the royal family.
    Do they have no one capable advising them?

    • Mac says:

      They clearly buy into the notion that no press is bad press. Unfortunately, that ship sank the day My Space went live.

    • Puff Updater says:

      The Beckingham Palace PR is an exact replica of the Buckingham Palace PR. It’s so bad and misguided that it feels intentional. I just can’t figure out what the intention is.

      • SummerMoomin says:

        Oh I think the reason for this mirroring of Buck palace was to get Becks a knighthood. And it worked! He’d been groveling for a knighthood for so long, and he only got it after he began publically mirroring King Charles’ parenting.

    • CatGotMyTongue says:

      It’s like the same playbook! How has that been working out for the BRF?

      The more they struggle; the more they try to control; the more they drive him away.

      • Siri says:

        Exactly! I don’t know why they don’t understand that. They have made it even more difficult for him to leave. If he leaves her he will feel like his parents won and would be forever telling him “I told you so”. His pride is at stake now.

  5. So the Beckhams are keeping quiet? Seems they have a lot of mouth pieces out there talking shit. So this new bit of tat is that they want Brooklyn back but without his wife! How sick and controlling!! Their mouth pieces are putting this out there and they think this is a good look for them. Again Brooklyn is an ADULT and as such he can marry and do what he wants because he is his own man now!! As parents you may not like who your ADULT son married but it’s best if you try to find common ground and make the best of it!! Unless that marriage is full of domestic violence keep your mouth shut and continue to love your son and accept the choices he makes!!

  6. Smices says:

    So what happens when/if grandchildren come along? Are they still gonna stick to their stance and refuse to see them if Nicola is their mom? I feel like they didn’t think this through.

    • Puff Updater says:

      I feel like maybe Nicola has a bun in the oven and that’s what made Brooklyn speak up now. Girl’s wearing ponchos.

  7. Jais says:

    Whew. What a bad look. It’s just confirming why Brooklyn has chosen to go no contact. Like we really get it now, jeez.

    • Jais says:

      Just adding that if this isn’t representative of their actual feelings, they should really put a story out that counters this.

      • Christine says:

        I agree. This leaves no room for any kind of reconciliation unless Brooklyn divorces Nicola or she dies. Either way, it’s bleak and a really ugly stance for parents to take.

        It’s like they are actively rooting for their son to go through huge amounts of pain so they can “take him back”.

    • Lill says:

      Right? Even if you don’t like your kids partner, you don’t actively root for their downfall in public like this.

      • Puff Updater says:

        Unless you’re a working member of the British Royal Family, then it’s par for the course. If the Beckz aspire to those malignant upper echelons no wonder they’re engineering this breakdown. Just drawing on the tactics of centuries of Court Intrigue. As someone else pointed out, they’re just making MAGAts look like the sympathetic parents here. It definitely hits a nerve with all of the millions of people who grew up in poorer, less famous but just as narcissistic families.

  8. ABritGuest says:

    Has there been an actual denial of any of the claims in Brooklyn’s statement even via ‘sources’? As I’ve seen fans say that Brooklyn was lying or say he was ungrateful etc but not sure I’ve seen the Beckhams camp say any part was untrue? Even in this people mag article it refers to why their childrens’ names were trademarked (standard for famous people) but can’t see anything on whether they insisted he sign over rights to them.

    • LinChi says:

      I haven’t seen a denial by the Beckhams. The closest thing would be Insta posts/messages written by his brothers. They’ve talked shit about him career hopping, after this newest statement they made a video with their gf’s along the lines of “Imagine being a hater and we’re just like” It seems the other boys and their partners are firmly team Becks.

  9. Savu says:

    I think the Beckhams are tipping their hand here when they keep bringing up the “Peltz family”. It makes me think their disapproval started immediately, and resembles some stiff upper lip British attitudes. The Beckhams want to bring the “family” into it for some reason.

  10. Eleonor says:

    Just like the firm with Harry and Meghan…

    • Jamie says:

      This part especially: “They are staying quiet because they don’t want to draw more attention to it,” a source says of the pair.
      They are “staying quiet” by sanctioning lots of “off the record” stories to the tabloids?!?!

  11. Chelsea says:

    “”Records from the U.K.’s Intellectual Property Office show that Victoria owns the trademarks on the names of all four of her children, including for Brooklyn’s siblings Romeo, 23, Cruz, 20, and Harper, 14. But a source close to the family insists the situation is a “misunderstanding,” explaining Victoria obtained them when her children were minors and unable to file for themselves””

    So if this was the case since he was a kid how did the subject get breached again in 2022. Was the trademark about to expire? Were they against Nicola taking the Beckham surname and tried to trademark her name or convince Brooklyn to stop her from taking it? This is weird. Also very funny that the alleged Beckham sources also admits that they are strategic in how they present themselves and their family because theyre a billion dollar brand. Are they so obsessed with their strategies that they’d get angry with one of their children for not doing performative social media posts as their oldest son claims? I haven’t seen any real defense of them that actually denies the crux of his claims which seems crazy to me.

    • wendy says:

      I think this is likely just rich people stuff — like Blue Ivy Carter — we plebs don’t think about brands and names etc. These people do.

    • kirk says:

      As I understand the “trademark” situation — the trademark on Brooklyn’s name is set to expire this year in December. Even though trademarks were filed when children were minors, the rights to a name do not automatically revert to the children when they reach age of majority (18), but the original filer can renew the registration at expiration. At that point, the now legal-age child could oppose the trademark renewal.

      As long as the trademark holders keep up the hissy front, this storyline looks to be tabloid evergreen for ~year.

  12. maisie says:

    It’s astonishing that the carefully curated Brand Beckham is letting this on the record. It paints them, particularly Victoria, as a jealous, spiteful and vindictive monster in law. I can’t imagine that she doesn’t have a publicist that will sit her down and tell her that.
    Plus, I don’t think Brooklyn will ever forgive her for this. Even if he and Nicola don’t last.

    If nobody else weill say it, I will: VB, stop digging and put down the shovel.

  13. Amy Bee says:

    Victoria and David need to learn to let go of their children.

  14. Betsy says:

    Why are Nicola’s clothes so awful?

    • CatGotMyTongue says:

      Money doesn’t buy taste. 🤷🏻‍♀️

      She’s young and rich. If I’d had her money at her age, I would probably have worn tacky expensive clothes too.

  15. ChillinginDC says:

    Yeah I am sorry, his parents sound a mess. I am not a fan of Nicola at all frankly, but them accusing her of wanting to be famous. LOL. Pot meet kettle. Victoria and David stayed together cause they were a brand. That man cheated and did all kinds of things. And then ran around looking like a tool just to get a knighthood.

  16. YankeeDoodles says:

    No woman has ever been jealous of a mother in law unless… words and imagination fail me. Age and time are cruel. Nicola is young, pretty, fabulously rich, and Brooklyn chose her over his own mother. What on *earth* would she have to be jealous of??? This is Victoria’s way of saying, “I’m not accountable for my deplorable behaviour at your wedding. You just want attention. Look at you, making a fuss.” British people have a weird aversion to “making a fuss,” which makes it much easier to cover up atrocious behaviour as there is a sort of DARVO setting built into their collective response to revelations of inappropriate conduct, when called to account for it. It’s the nastiest kind of gaslight, pure narcissism on Victoria’s part. She doesn’ think Nicola is a human with feelings. She’s just a rival. How sick.

  17. bisynaptic says:

    ‘“They are staying quiet because they don’t want to draw more attention to it,” a source says of the pair.‘
    — Very interesting way of staying quiet!

  18. OriginalMich says:

    The “she just wants to be famous” thing really irks me. So what if she does? Lots of people want to be famous. Victoria Beckham is the poster girl for wanting to be famous.

  19. Puff Updater says:

    OMG this is such a wonderful mess. Somehow it has the ability to distract from both Snowmaggedon ‘26 and the Decline of Western Civilization as we know it. Thanks Posh!!! She really reminds me of Gloria Swanson in Sunset Boulevard here, totally insane and completely unable to see who she really is. Those side-eye pictures from the French awards gave me chills, and lolz simultaneously. Does she really want Brooklyn to move back to Beckingham Palace, a broken unloved man doomed to play video games in a backwards ball cap forever? Fame might not be good for the soul.

  20. Mightymolly says:

    Although I don’t think Brooklyn and Nicola are anything like Meghan and Harry, the sir and lady Beckham do consider themselves a type of royal and they are absolutely following the BRF model of media abuse.

    • Snuffles says:

      The main similarity is that, like The Firm, the Beckham’s are more business than family. And they are treating Brooklyn more like an asset than a son. And they see Nicola as a thief that stole their asset.

      Mark my words, if/when Nicola has Brooklyn’s baby/babies, they will be screeching that those babies need to be a part of the Beckham family’s “warm embrace”. Then gripe about how Brooklyn needs to return to the UK with the kids and without Nicola. They will view all future baby Beckhams as assets too.

      • mightymolly says:

        I think you’re absolutely right on that. They want to run a dynasty. I said this on an earlier thread, but it’s like being British, money and extreme fame are not sufficient. They need to be seen as upper echelon society. But their tactics are super arriviste. Calling Carol Middleton.

  21. Lady Digby says:

    Ultimatums are high risk: be prepared to lose big time if you tell a loved one, it’s me or your spouse!

    • mightymolly says:

      Your chosen family is family. Hands down. Some of us are blessed to include our blood family as our chosen family, but there’s no obligation to do so. And in the ideal of a functional, happy marriage, your spouse is the closest person to you in the world.

  22. QuiteContrary says:

    The Beckhams are demonstrating the textbook way of how NOT to handle these kinds of things …

    I think it was the anthropologist Margaret Mead who described the mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relationship as the thorniest one in family dynamics. But sheesh, VB comes across as a mess here.

  23. Lady Digby says:

    Brooklyn is a person in his own right who belongs to himself. He has thoughts, feelings, needs, desires and hopes. He is married and is loyal and protective of his wife. He has put out a public statement detailing how the relationship with his parents has broken down. Forget the public image, if the parents want to reconcile with their son AND daughter in law then private talks need to take place acknowledging the hurt and anger.

  24. NotSoSocialB says:

    1) this is the surest way to never see their son and future grandchildren.

    2) no denial offered- this is affirmation of how horrible she/ they are as parents. Imagine how hurtful it is to your child to refuse to accept and welcome you child’s spouse for zero reason other than sick possessive enmeshment.

    So fkn gross. Good riddance, VB

  25. YankeeDoodles says:

    This is in reply to @Danilele, I always find it funny when people pull rank on a gossip story, like, MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS, you lowbrow plebs, after having come to a gossip site, and gone to the trouble of writing a comment at the end of a very looooooong thread. And, classic DARVO tactic, accusing us of “foaming at the mouth” is kind of what the British tabloids do every time Meghan speaks. An observation amply proven by the very next nasty jibe in your comment, painting Meghan as petulant and helpless. God, how sour and silly it sounds. And how projection betrays a bad conscience. It’s giving Victoria’s plea, “I’m not jealous of her! She’s jealous of ME!!!!”

  26. Logical Meow says:

    Ya I’m not buying it. It’s the Peltz side that said it: “Multiple Brooklyn and Nicola sources say that same invitation does not seem to be extended to Nicola. ‘The Beckhams have no intention of reconciling with their son unless Nicola is out of the picture,’ says a source familiar with the situation.”
    Nicola is copying Meghan and Harry, hoping she can get the sympathy of just a girl in love with a prince who is under pressure from a giant family machine when she is the very opposite of what Meghan represents. She historically isolates her significant others from their families. That’s abusive/narcissistic behavior. Many service providers have complained about the Peltz family’s behavior in regards to the wedding. And they’re MAGA Zionists.

  27. Krista says:

    Further proving Brooklyn’s point.

  28. Sara says:

    Team nobody for this mess

  29. therese says:

    I’m team Beckham. I think they have shown restraint. I still want to know the other side of the story. They’ve got three boys, and they were all dating, then one married. There seems to only be one problem. I’m not saying they are perfect, but they don’t have to be, do they. I’m not trying to be a contrarian, it’s just that I saw something in the past where someone put out untruths about another, and it caused a lot of damage. It was hard to watch, and at first, before the truth came out, everyone was jumping on the salacious and delicious untruths. I think there is more to the story, and it hasn’t been told. If it was, the Beckham’s might be mindful of being sued. I want to know the rest of the story.

  30. Mel says:

    I feel like a need a shower after reading that. What kind of controlling relationship do these people have with their kids? I always found it a little weird that they always traveled in a pack. Are they going to arrange marriages for the rest of the kids and make the all live in the same house like the Ewings?

    • ArtHistorian says:

      And will their other children sign over the rights to their names to their parents when their trademarks expire? I cannot help to notice that Brooklyn writes that a significant shift in his relationships with his parents happened when he refused to sign over the rights to his name to them.

      Some parents have serious issues with letting their children grow up and grow independent – and sometimes the parent/child relationship might have been good until this age of independance.

      The question will be: will the other children eventually want an existence outside of the family brand? Or will they stay enmeshed with their parents?

  31. Andrea says:

    What’s really sad is how his brothers abandoned him. Seems like he was right when he said that it’s all about the visuals to that family. . Victoria is letting those boys know who handles the purse strings.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment