Prince William is ‘not trying to be liked, he’s trying to protect the monarchy’

When the Duke and Duchess of Sussex left the royal institution in 2020, it came after a full year of certain royals trying to find a way to cause Harry and Meghan to divorce and/or manipulate the Sussexes’ exile. Many royal-watchers knew in 2019 and 2020 that the monarchy was making a terrible mistake by treating the Sussexes so poorly and by forcing H&M no other option but to leave. We knew, at the time, that Prince William and Kate would be left exposed, and that the Sussexit would blow back on them in ways they didn’t even understand. But six years later, I’m still astounded by how badly it’s gone for the left-behind Windsors, and how the Sussexit really was the beginning of the end. William, in particular, has never recovered and he remains the same wrathful, ignorant, illiterate dumbass as ever, only there’s no moderating force and no little brother to hide behind and copy and abuse. What’s even funnier is that William’s paid sycophants insist that his “ruthlessness” and violently vindictive nature are good things and good for the monarchy. Please enjoy Rob Shuter’s latest Substack:

Prince William may have a reputation for being tough — even ruthless — but insiders say that’s exactly why he’s the future of the monarchy. And why, increasingly, he’s the one really in charge.

“William is not afraid to make hard calls,” one insider tells Naughty But Nice. “And right now, that’s exactly what the Royal Family needs.”

Friends say his approach is a sharp contrast to King Charles, who is often seen as more emotional — and, at times, too soft. “Charles leads with his heart,” the source explains. “William leads with strategy.”

And when it comes to dealing with ongoing royal headaches — from his brother Prince Harry to his uncle Andrew — insiders say William isn’t interested in second chances. “He doesn’t forget, and he doesn’t forgive easily,” the insider adds. “If you cross the line, that’s it.”

In fact, those close to him say his so-called “ruthless streak” is not a flaw — it’s a necessity.

“The monarchy is under more pressure than ever,” the source says. “You need someone who can make tough, unpopular decisions.”

And William? He’s already doing it.

“He understands the stakes,” the insider explains. “This isn’t just family — it’s a business.”

That includes distancing the crown from controversy — even when it involves blood relatives.

“Andrew is a problem. Harry is a problem,” the source says bluntly. “William knows that — and he acts accordingly.”

Translation? “He’s not trying to be liked,” the insider says. “He’s trying to protect the monarchy.”

[From Rob Shuter’s Substack]

“He’s not trying to be liked” – he’s doing a bang-up job, then. He’s deeply unlikeable. What’s funny about that too is… being likeable is basically the only thing the royals are supposed to be at this point. That’s why they keep pushing those dumb emotional-support polls – the monarchy’s future is tied to their likeability and popularity. Without being “liked,” or having popularity at home or abroad, why are taxpayers funding these lazy idiots in the first place? Basically, this continues to be William’s argument for his kingship: he’ll be an unlikeable king who makes unpopular decisions, decisions like “rage-shrieking about Harry constantly.” And don’t forget “running away whenever Harry comes to town” and “throwing huge, messy tantrums whenever Harry does anything.”

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

67 Responses to “Prince William is ‘not trying to be liked, he’s trying to protect the monarchy’”

  1. Tessa says:

    Comparing harry to Andrew is a disgrace. Charles makes the ruthless decisions Charles did not hesitate to evict the sussexes and treat Diana badly and disparage his parents. The monarchy needs to be protected from scooter and his pettiness. Scoots won’t do a thing about Andrew he will keep up his mono mania about punishing the sussexes

    • Elizabeth Regina says:

      TOB desperately briefing again! Being liked is not a vanity metric for the British monarchy. It is the entire business model. The monarchy has no democratic mandate. It has no constitutional power in any meaningful modern sense. It does not pass laws. It does not run the country. What it has is public goodwill. Public affection. The sense, however constructed and however maintained, that the institution adds something to national life that justifies the taxpayer funding, the security costs, the grace and favour properties, the inherited wealth and the extraordinary privilege that comes with being born into that family.
      Without being liked, without popularity at home and abroad, without the public choosing to extend its goodwill to this institution, the entire justification for the monarchy collapses. And the future king’s closest allies are briefing the press that he is not trying to be liked.
      That is not a strength. That is an existential problem being repackaged as a virtue.

      • Chrissie T says:

        Totally agree. Being King and Head of State is an actual job he will have to do. So much of the job is about being able to connect with the British Public. If he goes after Harry when he becomes King that becomes his legacy. Also people will see it as a racial attack. In a multicultural society that doesn’t endear him to a lot of people. Another problem is there is no excitement or interest in the monarchy. William and Kate come across as old beyond their years and they are largely invisible. The need to reform the monarchy isn’t about punishing members of your family. It will be about having to renegotiate the money they receive, downsize and understand what work they are going to do with fewer people, in return for the money as well as being able to connect with the whole country not just the extreme right.

      • YankeeDoodles says:

        This is @Elizabeth Regina, 100%. 1,000%. ITA. I would add but one note, which is that “popularity” and “likeablility” are not the fluff concepts that William seems to imagine. Both his mother and grandmother weathered phases of superficial but clamorous scrutiny and scathing criticism, but both were genuinely loved and respected and held in deep esteem. There is a certain depth to observing a human life play out over decades.

    • Becks1 says:

      Every time they put Harry and Andrew in the same sentence it just makes the royal family look worse. How does no one realize that???

      • Swaz says:

        We all know that Harry is placed there to tarnish his image. He is William’s no. 1 problem because Harry does everything better ❤️

      • Kit says:

        I don’t know, l think he got much much worse when he got engaged and married, bitter, cross and angry all the time. William hates his life and is just pissed off that Harry got out with a more successful wife and life really. I mean Kate is not fit for this senior role, everyone can see that William knows that too which annoys him even further as it shows him.up , he always look embarrassedaround her.

        For him.l think he should just step out independently , l think if these two.separted he would be a different happier person, less stress on both of them, even Kate, he would genuinely feel better, get therapy which l know he probably won’t do, but if he did he would act and feel much better. I have noticed the Hate Blogs for Megan and Harry and
        Charles have got much worse lately, vile actually and you just know who its coming from!!

      • Mrs.Krabapple says:

        @KIT – the attacks on Harry and Meghan have ramped up because the palace knows how unpopular William is. By continuing to pit the brothers and their wives against each other, it causes people to “take sides.” So people who might have been mildly indifferent to the royals, will now throw “support” to William just because they’ve been taught to hate Meghan. It is definitely a calculated move by William and his tabloids.

  2. Tessa says:

    Scooter probably thinks the people like him. Other than the sycophants in the media I don’t think he’s well liked. The man is out for himself and his tough decisions involve grabbing property even closing off a public park.

    • Red Snapper says:

      He’s surrounded himself with boot lickers who laugh at all his jokes and tell him he’s smart and clever, and he believes it! William thinks he’s an amazing person because there’s noone to tell otherwise.

    • Me at home says:

      And bots. The NY TImes found in 2020 that Will and Kate spend ££££ on sycophantic bots.

      Tough decisions like financial transparency, stopping the exploitation of the duchies, paying reasonable taxes, or, you know, working more than one day a week would be meaningful. Raging at your relatives and stealing parkland are not meaningful.

  3. MrsCope says:

    It’s so funny because, what? They are mostly ceremonial/ornamental at this point, right? His ruthlessness, cruelty, shrewdness, whatever flaw they choose to put lipstick on doesn’t make sense because he isn’t ruling ANYTHING.

    • Indica says:

      I believe Scooter doesn’t understand that at all. He truly believes that as King, he’ll be a ruler and people will bow to his will. Delusional much?

    • BeanieBean says:

      Ha! He’s the most ruthless nonentity to ever exist!

  4. Dee(2) says:

    What problem is Harry exactly? I would love for these people to explain how Harry is a problem for the monarchy that doesn’t include, he aired dirty laundry in public, and he spoke about William and Kate’s actions.

    How does him existing in another country, not really speaking on the record regarding his family and using the British legal system to challenge inequalities make him a long term problem for the monarchy? In a way that again shows how this is a clear deficit for the monarchy as an institution, and not a deficit for the individual members because of their own personal behavior.

    All of this is just more excuse making as to why Williams petty, childish, unhinged actions aren’t things that you should be concerned about general public. I guess they finally realized that constantly describing him as incandescent, apoplectic, engorged with rage isn’t a great look. So now it’s, his anger is actually a good thing. You should be glad that he’s always incensed and wants to take retribution and hold grudges. Isn’t that what everyone wants in a leader?

    • Mrs.Krabapple says:

      And what is there to “forgive”? It’s despicable that they blame the victim of an assault for reporting the assault, rather than the violent a-hole who committed the assault. The world should never forget that William is a man who physically assaulted his younger brother, and who screams and throws things at his wife. That is not “making hard decisions,” that is a man who needs actual therapy and criminal charges.

  5. Hypocrisy says:

    Protecting it by making it so unpopular that no one bothers to show up at their engagements unless they are carrying yellow protest signs? The BRF popularity worldwide has plummeted even in the UK the barricades are set up for crowds that never show up.. Willy needs to get a reality check and makes some very serious changes before the monarchy makes itself so irrelevant it’s no longer worth reporting on.. BBC no longer finds it beneficial to cover some of the BRF events it should be a big red flag that change is desperately need.. I personally feel fatigued whenever I see another very obvious hate article where big tough Peggy is going to steal the Sussex’s titles or how he plans to “punish” the Sussex and now the York sisters. The hate coming from WanK needs to change, it’s making people turn away especially when we are all dealing with a hatefilled demented man who wants to destroy the world..

    • Where'sMyTiara says:

      The only change that needs to happen is to take William and some others (Andrew and progeny) out of the line of succession.

      Better yet would be to shut it all down, furlough the courtiers so they can finally write their tell-alls, and redirect all those stolen billions to the general welfare of the people of the UK, where the money belongs.

  6. lady digby says:

    If Will understands RF is a business how does he expect it to continue if he continues to not open the store for business because he refuses to work regularly? Will is the BIG problem here. Late Queen and current king accepted it was SHOW business as in show up and look busy and engaged with public concerns.

  7. Shiela Kerr says:

    Agree 100%, Harry and Meghan’s leaving has exposed the monarchy and shown how dreadful its future will be. It has been admitted that william is a dimwit, it has been observed he is not charismatic, empathetic or sensible. He just exists to take and make promises he will never deliver on and vacation as often as he chooses.

    • windyriver says:

      TQ’s passing also exposed the shortcomings of the monarchy. In her final years, she was existing in large part on residual goodwill from 70 years on the throne. Charles did his best to shove her memory out of the way as quickly as possible, assuming that reverence would pass along to him. Not so much. In any event, the years since her passing have increasingly shown that that goodwill towards her was already past its due date.

  8. Nerd says:

    I feel as if they keep forgetting that he in his role as king will be the head of the Church of England and in that role he should be a better example than he has been. The truth is that it is his and his wife’s actions that made the situation with the Sussexes what it is through their fear and jealousy of not being the more popular and talked about couple. Of course, Charles and Camilla would have done their part but it’s the constant betrayal of William, Kate and their staff at KP that makes this whole situation what it is today. So no, William’s approach won’t be what saves the monarchy, it is exactly what has made it the disaster it is today and it will only get worse with him at the top of this heaping pile of crap.

  9. Jais says:

    How can he save the monarchy when he does so little?

  10. India says:

    The only thing William wants to save is the money coming in for him and the Middletons from the Duchy of Cornwall.

    • irisrose says:

      ^This. Selling off a dozen Duchy farms and destroying some farmer’s livelihoods? To enrich himself with money that doesn’t belong to him.

  11. seaflower says:

    “he remains the same wrathful, ignorant, illiterate dumbass as ever” – I see what you did there. LOL.

    On another note, he could try do work, that might save the monarchy.

  12. Chantal1 says:

    “How to Not Make Friends And Alienate People!” Someone needs to explain to William the Vindictive that likeability or appearing to be likeable regardless of one’s true feelings is a key component to soft diplomacy and to being a good global statesman. Someone clearly hasn’t been paying attention bc his grandmother displayed that component well. C-Rex displays it to a point but can’t seem to get out of his own way when it comes to his personal life. Leaders with actual power aren’t going to kiss W’s ass and some might work with and/or actually like Harry. Then what? Most dictators aren’t afraid of other bullies. Even the bullying Felon knows that and that’s one of the reasons he sucks up to dictators like Putin (kompromat, his desire to be a dictator, and the fact that he just plain sucks are other reasons). But Willy Nilly is a huge liability in more ways than one.

  13. Jensa says:

    “William leads with strategy”. Hilarious. How do they come up with this stuff?
    And Harry is only a problem because he shows that it’s perfectly possible to break away from the BRF, cut the purse strings and make your own way in life. And that rather calls into question why we (in the UK) continue to subsidise the whole extended bunch of them, at huge cost and not much return. You can see why Charles and William don’t want a light shining on all that.

  14. Blujfly says:

    He’s protesting the monarchy through leaks about himself, distancing himself from the current monarch, undermining the last two monarchs, having the lowest public profile of the last two monarchs, and turning his duchy into a private equity backed holding company. It’s very strategic.

  15. Inge says:

    Sometimes I think William would be better suited to the Henry VIII era throne lots of fighting, full power, beheadings for those he disliked and as many mistresses as he liked(plus no-one dared to defy the king)

    • ArtHistorian says:

      The he might have suffered the fate of a Richard II or a Henry VI (deposed and murdered).

      Even absolutist kings could not survive without negotiating with the nobilitiy, etc. Kings who disregarded anything but their own will, like Richard II, eventually got killed.

  16. Miranda says:

    Not gonna lie, I find it immensely entertaining to watch the RR desperately try to shine up this turd that they’re stuck with.

  17. Eurydice says:

    Another day, another load of bull sh*t. How did Charles “lead with his heart” when he took away Harry’s home and protection? What kind of “heart” did he exhibit when he allowed an 8 year hatchet job against H&M? As for William, the monarchy needs protection from him, not the other way around.

  18. Ok well 1. He is definitely not liked!! 2. This is no way to save a monarchy this is the way to burn it down! Dimwit knows not what he is doing!

    • WaterDragon says:

      I agree that Scooter is definitely not liked by most people, so I guess Scooter can crow from the rooftops that he has achieved his goal.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        He has finally found his calling! Being unlikeable! It’s his great accomplishment.

        Being unlikeable is one very big accomplishment he can hold over Harry’s head!lol

        Finally, something he does better than Harry. So, there!!!!

    • Gail says:

      I’m beginning to think he knows EXACTLY what he is doing. He’ll strip as much money as he can, he’ll squirrel it away, and he’ll do what he wants, which is power with no responsibility, for starters. He may not be liked, but I don’t think he’s stupid. I think he’s sly. He’s sneaky. He’s a watch your back kind of guy, IMO

  19. Brassy Rebel says:

    As anachronistic as the monarchy is, this isn’t the Middle Ages. A vengeful king who makes unpopular decisions won’t fly in the 21st century. It’s absurd to suggest that this is exactly what the monarchy needs when more and more people see it as a pointless but expensive exercise in privilege and entitlement. So, by all means, let William continue on with his project to kill the monarchy. He’s doing everyone a favor!

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Even in the Middle Ages, a vengeful king making unpopular decisions could easily lead to uprisings, deposition and regicide. There are a LOT of regicides throughout history – and they generally have to do with a King violating the written and unwritten rules of society, like Richard II appropriating Henry Bolingbroke’s legal inheritance as the new Duke of Lancaster. Or Christian II trying to reduce the power of the nobility in favour of the merchant class. THe image of the all powerful king that no one dares defy is an illusion.

      If William is deposed then he should thank the stars that he lives in the 21st century because he won’t be killed if he loses the throne.

      • kirk says:

        Maybe he’ll be like “Silly Billy” (Wm the IV (1830-1837)), the oldest monarch to ascend the throne at age 64. Just kidding, sorta. “Silly Billy” was a somewhat affectionate moniker for a giddy young man who joined the Royal Navy at age 13, rising to the rank of Rear Admiral, and who threatened his daddy with standing for House of Commons when daddy withheld a desired dukedom.

        Might be interesting to watch someone who, as diarist Greville reported, “made a number of speeches, so ridiculous and nonsensical, beyond all belief but to those who heard them, rambling from one subject to another, repeating the same thing over and over again, and altogether such a mass of confusion, trash and imbecility as made one laugh and blush at the same time…The Government and their people have now found out what a fool the King is…they find him rather shuffling and exceedingly silly.” Of course we’d all have to wait ~20 years for the spectacle, which actually sounds about right if Chuck lives as long as his mom, Betty. OTOH the confluence of the rise of Republic with decline of monarchists may render that moot.

  20. Me at home says:

    So Willy is making “hard calls” about… raging against family members and (sort of) stripping their titles. Oh my, how impressive, that will definitely save the monarchy.

    How about making some “hard calls” about financial transparency, or paying reasonable taxes and releasing your tax returns, or making duchy management less exploitative, or returning some duchy or crown lands to the people? Or, you know, WORKING at your job, or preparing for your COE job?

  21. Over it says:

    Wank needs Jesus in his life but since he is a Christian with an invisible c, I won’t hold my breath. I will say it again, that new archbishop needs to call Willy in for weekly prayers and therapy sessions because this sad excuse for a man is seriously lacking.

    • Where'sMyTiara says:

      It wouldn’t take two sessions of Billy Basher with the Archbishop before royalist substacks started ringing with Billy’s cries of “who will rid me of this turbulent priest?”

      And they would praise that turn of events, because the vicious media, and the execrable courtiers who feed them news, are as cooked as the monarchy itself.

    • kirk says:

      “Christian with an invisible c,” — 😹😇

  22. Morning says:

    I would not be surprised to hear that Harry has been approached to rejoin the royal work force and has declined to do so without a labor contract.

  23. Becks1 says:

    Yeah, he needs to be likeable to save the monarchy. heck even Charles knows this and its why there’s such back and forth in the press re: Charles and harry – because Charles can’t figure out which approach is better (banishment or reconciliation) in terms of making HIM, charles, look better.

    That’s why these stories about his temper, his rages, his bullying, his authoritarian approach etc all sort of baffle me because they make him sound horrible, and in 2026 most people dont even really want a king, let alone one they hate.

    • Me at home says:

      Rage and bullying are all Willy’s got. So his sycophants have to go with that and try to make it a good thing.

      He doesn’t have anything meaningful, like duchy reform. Or taking less money from the duchies and the crown estate. Or paying taxes and making his tax returns public. Or going to church. Or talking about his favorite authors and movies. Or, you know, working harder and ditching the vanity projects like Earthflop.

    • Where'sMyTiara says:

      The whole reason the monarchy is foundering, is because Cluck and Huevo are detestable. They are fundamentally unlikeable.

      They managed to exile the only two that were likeable, because their popularity was considered a personal threat to Cluck and Huevo.

      To say that the Windsors overplayed their hands at Sandringham would be gross understatement.

      The attacks on Harry and Meghan, and the proximity of Her Late Maj’s two eldest sons to different pedo rings are what is bringing the monarchy down. Full stop.

      It’s the actions of Chaz, Andrew, and Billy that have caused ‘le deluge’, not what meetings Meghan has taken, not what jewelry she’s been spotted wearing, and not what books Harry has written or what interviews either H&M have given.

      • Becks1 says:

        No, Charles isn’t really likeable and I think the weird thing is that he could be. If his first marriage hadn’t been such a disaster (even if he and Diana still got divorced), if he wasn’t always so obsessed with the popularity of other royals like Diana and Harry and jealous of that popularity – if he had just kind of done his thing over the past few decades without all the pettiness etc, I think he would be much more likeable now. People would see his personality issues as charming quirks or his fastidiousness as just part of him. his gardening would be seen as a cute old man thing and not something that he does to hide from real life, etc.

    • Nic919 says:

      William isn’t surrounded by people who know history because since George IV, the British monarchy doesn’t tend to like male monarchs especially since they don’t actually fight to defend their country. Charles not being openly aggressive is actually the smarter way to be seen in the modern era especially since the public is not that enthused with this archaic institution. Female monarchs are tolerated more because the inherent misogyny makes them perceived as non threats and pretty decorations.

      William wanting to be the bro king will backfire, especially when he competes one sided with a brother who has actually fought for the country.

  24. 992234177 says:

    Prime Minsters don’t need to be liked but respected. The Royal Family do. It is literally a perpetual popularity contest, ask Harry, ask Diana, ask Lizzie, ask Camilla. It is literally the whole job, every action is to be seen through a microscope, including the statement about William.

  25. Monc says:

    He hit a home run on the “not-wanting-to-be-likable” he must be proud

  26. kelleybelle says:

    … which means he knows what’s out there: the truth. Of course he’s trying to be liked. I hear Robin Williams from Patch Adams telling a fellow doctor, “Yeah, but you suck at it.”

  27. Lady Digby says:

    Definitely not liked and totally and forever, not hardworking! Chuck should have REFUSED to allow him the PoW title without setting down firm rules on increasing his workload until he achieved 500 engagements and 2 Royal tours a year.A co worker with an unbelievable attitude towards women was told by his boss that an IMMEDIATE improvement from that day onward was required to avoid disciplinary proceedings against him. He did indeed get his act together because he knew that certain neanderthal views were completely unacceptable in the modern workplace. He been dumped on us following an unspecified episode and “a fresh start was deemed necessary with a final warning attached.” He knocked it off because he was in danger of loosing his job. Okay Will is “not subject to employment law” but royalist tabloids have been marking his homework and must improve is the result. He’d be TOAST if the tabs turned on him so he can’t be complacent when deference is over.

  28. Amy Bee says:

    Whatever. Everybody knows he’s a lightweight and incompetent. That’s why the British is so desperate for Harry to return to royal life to act as cover for him.

  29. Jay says:

    Another “William is the real power behind the throne” article that’s big on talk but pretty scant on action, don’t you think?
    We’re told that William is “ruthless” and
    “not afraid to make hard calls”. Well gosh, which calls did he make again? I didn’t hear him arguing vociferously for his uncle’s titles to be removed. Or for him to be turned over to the FBI. In fact, the Wales statement was a late, mealy-mouthed expression of vague support for his father’s decision. Maybe that’s “ruthless”. Oh, and I shouldn’t forget about how he so bravely let his sources leak to the press that if his cousins are invited to Ascot, he will throw his toys out of the pram and refuse to go! Andrew, the perpetrator, however will remain housed on a royal property at great expense. But he’s bravely letting it be known on background through a friend of a friend that he wants the daughters punished. And it’s rumoured that he maybe didn’t get them an Easter gift! Wow, there’s a man who isn’t afraid of taking consequential actions! So long as they are acts of passive aggression and actually just gossip, then yeah, what ruthlessness!

    Such leadership. Much decisiveness.

  30. jferber says:

    I’d like to know what William’s definition of “strategy” is. Because he is NOT strategic. He is hateful, impulsive, arrogant, cruel, selfish, greedy and a killer at heart. So if that’s his strategy, then yes, he is strategic–just not in the ways he thinks he is.

  31. jferber says:

    Elizabeth Regina, hear, hear! You nailed it. Perfect and absolutely right.

  32. jferber says:

    Here’s the English teacher in me: Willy Loman in Death of a Salesman was liked, but not well-liked. William is disliked, and deeply disliked. There’s the difference. Willy’s life was a personal tragedy whereas William’s will be a national tragedy.

    • irisrose says:

      When he is removed, the monarchy ended, William penniless and forced to pay for his own life and those of his children?

      That will not be a national tragedy, that will be cause for national celebration.

  33. jferber says:

    Irisrose, I like your take on this. I see William pulling down all of England in his ignominious fall from grace. But you’re right–it’s England’s liberation and freedom from these horrible vultures.

  34. QuiteContrary says:

    If the monarch doesn’t need to be liked, why did Charles wage that whole campaign to boost Camilla’s popularity?

    Also, I LOL’d at this: “Charles leads with his heart,” the source explains. “William leads with strategy.”

    They clearly couldn’t say William leads with his brain, because he’s such a dumbass.

  35. BeanieBean says:

    Well, at least he’s succeeding in one thing….

  36. StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

    “The monarchy is under more pressure than ever,” the source says. “You need someone who can make tough, unpopular decisions.”

    Like what? A walkabout with Meg? Not going to see his wife at the hospital? Not renovating his slums? Taking public park space for his personal use? Being always late to meetings? Taking perks from apple? Not goingto his godfather’s funeral?

    What this really means is that he is prepping his coronation and kate’s fabric research this year/last year is also to design around it. The lazies are working hard non-stop choosing color schemes and creating an invite with graphics.

  37. Jes says:

    knifing his family members and being unlikeable is quite the strategy.

  38. Tessa says:

    And the keens say in a patronizing way they are putting the children first and doing less work. Children are put first by loving parents who work to support their kids to assure they have a secure future. The keens needs to stop using the kids to try to justify their lazy ways taxpayers should not be required to pay for the lazy pair.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment