Jeff Bezos & Lauren Sanchez probably paid $10-20 million to ‘sponsor’ the Met Gala

It will be interesting to see how this year’s Met Gala plays out, especially with Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez sponsoring the event and acting as co-chairs. If I’m being honest, I doubt that the Sanchez-Bezos presence will cause much of a stir, nor do I think that many celebrities will care one way or the other. I saw the guest list for the Bezos wedding last year – A-listers showed up because they wanted to kiss-up to one of the richest men in the world and his tacky bride. Still, for Anna Wintour to give her blessing to the Bezoses, they needed to write a big check. An eight-figure check.

Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos paid at least $10 million to sponsor the Met Gala Monday night, Page Six can reveal. This puts the billionaire couple, who will sit with close pals including Kris Jenner at the party, firmly in Anna Wintour’s good graces.

They are also honorary co-chairs of fashion’s biggest night, alongside Beyoncé, Nicole Kidman, Venus Williams and Wintour herself — the former Vogue editor who uses the starry annual event to raise money for the Anna Wintour Costume Center at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

“The Bezoses are where the American dream is at right now for status, wealth and style,” former Vogue editor William Norwich told Page Six. “They display conspicuous consumption [and] they have the ‘AWOK’ — the Anna Wintour OK.”

But for many in the fashion crowd, Wintour’s courting of America’s new “bizarro” royalty — as one insider dubbed the Bezoses — who this week celebrated Britain’s King Charles and Queen Camilla at a state dinner at the White House, where Sanchez Bezoz wore 200 carats of emeralds – goes against what the Met Gala stands for.

“I’m heartbroken,” admitted a frequent Met Gala guest and fashion insider. “It’s being able to buy yourself into [the good graces of] Anna and the Met.”

Wintour’s eyes, it seem, are on the bottom line: Last year, she raised $31 million, the biggest gross in the event’s 77-year history. Norwich said that 76-year-old Wintour — who remains Chief Content Officer for Condé Nast and Global Editorial Director of Vogue after handing over the day-to-day reins of the fashion bible to Chloe Malle earlier this year — would have first approached the Bezoses about financing the gala at least two years ago, which the fashion insider agreed with. Despite this, other sources told us Wintour reached out after the Bezos wedding to make the request.

Sources told Page Six that Bezos paid at least $10 million to sponsor the ball, which this year has the theme of “Costume Art” and has the Bezos name plastered all over the invites. In fact, it could well be up to $20 million, said another source in the know.

[From Page Six]

My guess is that the total cost was probably $20 million or higher. I doubt that Wintour would have signed off on “sponsoring the Met Gala,” her baby, for anything less than $20 million. And yes, Jeff and Lauren are being completely open about what they’re doing too – they’re buying access and they’re buying the cultural cachet of the gala. Jeff wants his tacky wife to be embraced by the A-list fashionistas and he’s willing to spend a lot of money to make it happen.

Interestingly enough, the NYT had a fascinating story late last week about how the gala might end at some point, or significantly change. The reason? Because for the past decade, the Costume Institute has been quietly funneling gala revenues into a nest-egg “endowment” which could easily fund the Costume Institute’s exhibitions and operations for years to come. Per the NYT: “By 2030 — possibly as soon as 2028 — the Costume Institute will have saved enough of a nest egg to potentially support its own basic operations for the foreseeable future, no matter what happens in the greater museum economy or with the gala itself.” The Costume Institute’s director told the Times that the goal is to not be reliant on Met Gala revenues forever, especially after they had to cancel the gala during the pandemic. He called the gala “not sustainable.” I get all of that… but why not continue throwing the gala and just use the money for other causes, perhaps?

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

38 Responses to “Jeff Bezos & Lauren Sanchez probably paid $10-20 million to ‘sponsor’ the Met Gala”

  1. Jenny says:

    Could they perhaps expand the gala, and use some of that funding to help the cost of the Met as a whole, rather than just the costume institute? Maybe make the museum itself more affordable to visit, for example.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Really. I found this part rather ominous, ‘…no matter what happens in the greater museum economy .’ Is the Metropolitan Museum of Art in financial difficulties?! I mean, if they’re going to allow their building to be the location of this ball year after year, I sure hope they got a good sized chunk of the take for doing so.

      • Tis True, Tis True says:

        The article did mention that The Met did take a portion of the money raised as overhead. This is absolutely normal. Worked for a university research lab and the university took about a quarter of all the money we raised.

        My main takeaway was when someone talked about how the Costume Institute had their own gallery space now and that the normal exhibit cycle for that sort of space is one major exhibit every 2-3 years, with smaller ones in between. And that having a large exhibit every year was taxing. I’ve noticed that the Gala has major years (the Churcg, Black dandyism) and whatever is going on this year . Wouldn’t be surprised if the Gala moves from the annual to the opening of major exhibits.

  2. Amy Bee says:

    I think as long the Met Gala raising money it should continue. The money could go to other aspects of the museum. As for Anna Wintour allowing the Bezos to buy access, I’m not surprised by this. She’s getting money for the Costume Institute. People like to project their own morals onto her but she had no qualms rubbing shoulders with the Trumps and the likes of Henry Kissinger in the past. She sat next to the Queen in 2019 and was seen smoozing with the Charles and Camilla last week.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      She says Trump will never be invited to the Met Gala again although he’s desperate for an invite. Then she goes and schmoozes B&S which is almost the same as Trump. 🤔

      • kirk says:

        Sounds like Bezos is more willing to part with $$$ than tRump. He opened up his house for Kris Jenner party. And if Anna Wintour stiffed him for $10M-$20M so he could keep BezosBarbie happy, good for them all. Stephanie Winston Wolkoff reported in her ‘Melamia & Me’ book that donald was always gross around the Met Gala. He would buy the cheapest individual tickets for $1,500 and expect premium seating and whine for special favors— that’s the reason Wintour doesn’t want tRump at the party anymore. He’s a needy, cheapskate boor.

    • Eurydice says:

      Yes, it’s a fundraiser. Rich people have funds. And better that those funds leave Bezos’ wallet than just sit there collecting moths. In any case, $20 million was probably the loose change he found under his sofa cushions.

    • BeanieBean says:

      I always think of Kim & Kanye’s wedding photos on the cover. Yeah, Wintour will suck up to anyone for the cash.

    • Felicity Fox says:

      I’m feeling world weary today so all I can think is that they all deserve each other. It reminds me of my son, when a little fella, who said he didn’t want to take baths because he didn’t want to soak in his “own juices.” 🤣 They all deserve to do that with each other in their shared richtub.

  3. Miranda says:

    Too bad they’re not doing the “camp” thing this year. Bezos bringing his RealDoll as his date would be so on-theme.

  4. Brassy Rebel says:

    I disagree. If the only way to keep the Met Gala going is to suck up to gross billionaires who are MAGA adjacent, just end it. I don’t think they’re ever going to top last year’s incredible Black Style theme anyway. Bezos and Sanchez are tacky and gross no matter what they fund.

    • Amy Bee says:

      A lot of museums have been built on the donations of millionaires and billionaires. Andrew Carnegie was famous for this in NY. The Met Gala started as a fundraiser put on by the wives of the richest people in NY. The Bezos being involved is no different.

      • Brassy Rebel says:

        I’m not opposed to rich people funding worthy things. I’m opposed to MAGA oligarchs who are destroying this country rehabilitating their reputations in polite society this way. Because that’s exactly what they’re trying to do. Mackenzie Scott is a hero. Her ex husband should be shunned forever.

      • Amy Bee says:

        Millionaires and billionaires have always laundered their reputation by donating to charity. To become a millionaire someone’s undoubtedly being exploited.

      • Brassy Rebel says:

        Perhaps I am not being clear. In Bezos’ case the difference is Trump who is uniquely evil and destructive in American history. Andrew Carnegie and the Rockefellers were awful. But they weren’t propping up a fascist destroying everything good about this country.

      • BeanieBean says:

        Carnegie at least gave us libraries.

      • Granger says:

        Make America Read Again! 🙂

  5. Veronica S. says:

    The wealthy are all pretty much birds of a feather at this point, but there is something slightly amusing about people like Lauren Sanchez that have SO MUCH but still want to be loved and admired on top of it. You see it with Brooklyn Beckham’s wife, too. They just can’t understand why their wealth, which gives them access to everything else, can’t buy them the same economy of attention and esteem. Doomed to follow the trend, never to set it. Pleases the mean girl in me.

    • Lady Esther says:

      Amen

    • Josephine says:

      I do wonder about the gatherings of all of these billionaires and maggots. There is just nothing cool or interesting about these people. No matter how much they butcher their faces and their bodies, they still have the same vacant souls. They spend and spend and spend and they all seem miserable, insecure, and boring.

  6. Wilma says:

    It will just be another occasion on which Lauren will be called tacky and tasteless. They can go to as many places and events as they want, the tackiness will always be there and will always be called out.

    • Kaaaaz says:

      No amount of money in the world can buy true respect or class. It is possible to have these attributes and wealth, but being obscenely wealthy in itself doesn’t make you likable.

  7. L4Frimaire says:

    The Met Gala will still get the hype, and it will center on the co-chairs and the fashion. The Bezos’ think they’re in their Gilded Age era. At least they’re buying their way into society through finally funding something arts related. I don’t understand how they lack so much finesse. I remember during the 80s when Vogue would cover new money socialites from the so-called masters of the universe. The wives, many of them 2nds from non-Waspy backgrounds, would be showcased in Vogue showing off their UES homes with antique French furniture done by society decorators, and the various charity boards they were on and the couture they wore during the society party circuit. Lauren is smart and personable but her style is inconsistent and centered around showcasing her breast implants. She’s no Bertha Russell. He’s gone overboard on the Botox and looks like he’s had work done too. The Bezos’ are portrayed as grotesque Roald Dahl characters stomping around throwing money at whatever sticks to give them more gloss. Some of that is well deserved considering how poorly Bezos treats the average Amazon worker and what he did to the Washington Post.

  8. fwiw says:

    Lauren’s lips have gone down some and look better.

    Recently I saw her referred to as Jeff’s flotation device.

  9. IdlesAtCranky says:

    Yeah, I’m with Zendaya. This is a good one to quietly sit out.

  10. martha says:

    The Costume Institute is a great museum and I say take all the rich assholes money you can get.

    I think it would be a good idea to continue the Gala. Maybe change its form so it is more than a one-night event.

    There are plenty of small (and smallish) local museums that have lost their federal funding in this administration’s cutting off arts + education grants – They could use the money!

    Anyway – things are kind of shitty right now – we can enjoy the distraction today + get back to trying to right the world tomorrow.

  11. BeanieBean says:

    I love how one ‘insider’ says it was $10 million and another says $20 million. Neither one is an insider & neither one knows! Whatever it was, it was a sh*t ton of money.

  12. Regina says:

    I still can’t get over the fact that Jeff Bezos agreed to marry Lauren Sanchez as long as she keeps getting plastic surgery to look like Sofia Vergara.

    On the other hand, nothing surprises me anymore.

    • Sue says:

      Honestly, I’m now wondering if Bezos and Sanchez are part of the same kink community as Kristi Noem’s husband.

  13. QuiteContrary says:

    These rich people, Sanchez included, look terrible. Plug-ugly.

    Like the elites in the capital in The Hunger Games.

    It’s bizarre. Anna Wintour is taking their money and laughing at them. Good for her.

  14. apostrophe says:

    The Gala’s a big fund-raiser, but it’s an expensive party. While we love to see the fashion, does the Gala fit in with the Met’s overall mission and brand? The Costume Institute is only one part of the institution. That’s the more important question, I think.

    • liz says:

      I think that at one time, the Gala did fit into the Museum’s overall mission. It’s purpose was to fund the operations of the Costume Institute (which for oddball historical reasons, is funded separately from the other curatorial departments).

      In the last 15 years or so, it has become this overwhelming show that brings the rest of the museum to a crashing halt for almost two weeks (set up and break down take days on either side of the Gala, meaning multiple galleries are closed – the American Wing and the Egyptian Wing are almost completely inaccessible).

      I think that at this point, the Gala has outlived its usefulness. From the Times article, it appears that it will not be needed to fund the Costume Institute’s operations for much longer, if they can successfully transition to endowment funding. It might be time to call it a day.

      The museum has a number of other fundraising galas every year, targeted at other audiences (Family Benefit, Apollo Circle, Acquisitions Dinner, etc). This particular one has just become a spectacle.

  15. KC says:

    I’m guessing staff hate the carnival nonsense of it all and would love nothing more than to be free to do their work in peace away from billionaires and celebrities. Good for them for building an endowment. I hope it continues to grow and at some point will allow them to get rid of entrance fees like the Cleveland Art Museum. It’s one of the best art museums in the country and it’s free for everyone.

    • liz says:

      I know a lot of staff members at the Met. They all dread this week.

      Security, facilities/maintenance, and visitor services have to deal with the bulk of it and they are the lowest paid people in the building. The curatorial staff can all hide in their offices, but the VX people who have to tell visitors that “those galleries are closed” and “I’m sorry, this week is all member previews and those tickets are sold out” are in for a rough week.

  16. Sue says:

    I suddenly have that illustrious pop hit “Money Can’t Buy You Class” by Countess Lu Ann de Lesseps of RHONY stuck in my head.

  17. Henny Penny says:

    The super wealthy know that by 2028 the American public will no longer have an appetite for the Met Gala. By 2028, American culture will no longer exist and millions of Americans will likely be starving or sick and dying from lack of medical care by then. I know they don’t care about any of that because they are actively making this happen, but I’m guessing they planned to be holed up in their missile silos by then.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment