Mail: Pippa Middleton’s latest failures prove she’s another talentless ‘spare’

Last week, we learned that Pippa Middleton and her terribly moderately wealthy husband James Matthews sold their “investment property” in Berkshire. Soon after moving out of London in 2022, Pippa and TMW James bought a grand estate for their family, and they also purchased Bucklebury Farms, a local petting zoo which came with significant acreage. The petting-zoo property seemed mostly for Pippa, like she was using it to experiment with some revenue-generating projects. The problem? No one cared, and her projects went nowhere and people were pissed that she jacked up the prices for the petting zoo. In just a few short years, the investment property racked up £807,543 in debt. So Pippa and TMW James sold the property quietly, to even more dismay from the community. They’re really pissing off everyone in their area. Well, I wondered if there would be any further commentary on the broke-ass grifter Middletons. Would you look at that, Dick Fitzwilliams thinks that this latest controversy proves that Pippa is a fail-spare, just like the Sussexes!

As Pippa Middleton and her high-flying husband James Matthews finally call it quits on their £1.3million petting zoo, one wonders what could possibly be next in store for the sister of the Princess of Wales. She become an overnight sensation due to her figure-hugging dress at Kate’s wedding to Prince William in 2011, but the socialite has struggled to truly escape her sister’s royal shadow.

According to royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams, Pippa’s trajectory ‘echoes’ the experience of Prince Harry, who has often complained about his upbringing as a royal ‘Spare’. Mr Fitzwilliams told the Daily Mail: ‘Life’s lottery can be very cruel. No one can influence when they are born. Yet if your eldest sibling becomes famous, the spotlight often falls on you as well. If you lack talent, the obstacles can be insuperable. Despite the temptation, it can be unwise to try to cash in on this peripheral fame. The pity is that, like Harry and Meghan, she seems to want to prove something.’

While Pippa, 42, has dabbled in the world of books, fitness columns and even a brief television stint, none of these ventures have ever materialised. Instead, she has been subject to financial loss, public ridicule, and quickly cancelled deals. Most recently, her big plan was to convert 72-acre Bucklebury Farm into a thriving business and family attraction with her husband James. However, it was hit by six-figure losses every year, resulting in a debt of £807,543 in 2025.

Their plans to expand the site were routinely criticised by the local highways authority, while one nearby resident called the venture a ‘snooty cash grab’ that had become a ‘place of snobbery and middle-class inclusivity.’ Yet while many locals may welcome the downfall of Bucklebury Farm – it marks the latest in a long list of ‘unhappy business experiences’ for Pippa spanning more than two decades.

After amassing attention across the globe in 2011 due to her figure-hugging bridesmaid dress at the royal wedding of Kate and Prince William, Pippa was quick to enter into the world of celebrity and embrace lucrative deals. In 2012, it was announced Pippa had landed a deal from publishing house Penguin worth £400,000 for a book on party planning. But, her party planning book, Celebrate, was not well received and sales were poor.

Mr Fitzwilliams explained: ‘There are echoes here of Harry, whose ill-advised memoir Spare made all too clear that the supposedly inseparable brothers were far from being close. Meghan’s much touted cookery series for Netflix, With Love, Meghan met a similar fate with reviewers to Pippa’s book and viewing figures were low.’

[From The Daily Mail]

Pippa WISHES she could have “failed” like Harry and Meghan – Harry’s book was a bestseller which earned him tens of millions of dollars. Meanwhile, Pippa’s book full of Pippa Tips was a complete publishing failure. Meghan’s entertaining show made the top-ten most-viewed shows on Netflix, while Pippa couldn’t even land a special correspondent gig on NBC because her test shoot was so bad. The Sussexes have earned millions. Pippa just had to sell her investment petting-zoo which was over a million dollars in debt. Maybe Pippa’s situation is less about “she’s a spare, just like Harry” and more like “the grifter Middletons are terrible at business and they ruin everything they touch.”

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

38 Responses to “Mail: Pippa Middleton’s latest failures prove she’s another talentless ‘spare’”

  1. There is absolutely no comparison between Pippa and the Sussexes!! The Sussexes are not failures ( the royalist want him to be but they are SUCCESSFUL) the Middletons are a golden digging family full of failures!!

    • Hypocrisy says:

      Pippa like the rest of the Middletons are just horrible business people I think they bank far to much on the Royal connection to float their business and WanK does not have the ability to even make the public interested in them let alone social climbing in laws.

  2. Lady Esther says:

    From the beginning I saw the whole investment property (a petting zoo? Under what sun is this an attractive investment proposition?) scheme as a tax offset against the purchase of Pippa and Terribly Moderately Wealthy James’ 15 million pound house purchase. Running business losses of less than a million pounds a year, for a set amount of years sounds like just the right sum to write off against much, much larger family income. They don’t care about bad press, they’re not trying to run a business like Party Pieces. They just wanted to do things like put in an Olympic-sized swimming pool while on the other part of their tax filing they’d file losses they could easily handle given their actual wealth. Just a thought

    • Nikki (Toronto) says:

      I think you’re on to it. I do wonder if they sold the property to another corporation that they control. If the farm was failing, why not donate the animals to another petting zoo and keep the land? Especially when that land neighbours your property.

      • Jais says:

        Yeah, I’m more curious about who they sold to and what will happen to the land and the zoo.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Ah, that makes sense. And if these papers had actual journalists rather than royal a**kissers writing for them they’d know how to chase that story down.

  3. ThatGirlThere says:

    I would LOVE to be the “flop” that Meghan is. I’ll never be over how some tried to say that Meghan and Pippa looked alike. I was like “gurl.”

  4. YankeeDoodles says:

    I think Party Pieces was likely a legitimate business for a while and ran into issues when GDPR legislation came into effect in 2018 IIRC. My son is 14 now, but when he was born, as many mums do, I stocked up on all manner of random kit and gear and once received their catalogue, unbidden. I flipped through it, never ordered anything, never received it again. But you end up on a lot of cross-referenced mailing lists, from purveyors of baby things & toddler things & school uniforms, & kiddie activities, and camps, etc…. Selling access to those contacts lists was a major revenue driver for those businesses, and a lot of them downsized and / or folded when they could no longer traffic in personal information about their clients. I think that’s when they started to shore up the business with dodgy side hustles and load it up with debts to suppliers that went unpaid. Pippa’s petting zoo might have been a similar wheeze: get folks in the door, sell them all manner of tacky tat, get them on a mailing list, get round the rules somehow, get back into cross-promotions or product placements for your kiddie line of parties and all the kit that goes with parties — costumes, themes, cakes, cups, plates, etc…. Photos taken on the day by professionals, the business plan writes itself but it was probably all conceived by Carole as another last ditch effort to shore up Party Pieces.

    • Nic919 says:

      That is exactly what happened because they formed the corporation in 2019 after years of being a private partnership. Now I don’t think the company ever made that much money, especially to match the royals level of lifestyle, but they definitely ran into issues when the GDPR cut off their main legitimate way to earn money.

      It still doesn’t excuse party pieces, especially Carole, shafting the local small businesses and using her connection to Kate to have the business agree to do work for her.

    • irisrose says:

      Nic919, they sold all that client info without permission too.

      It never made enough to afford the life they were living. They were funded by Uncle Gary the drug dealing wife beater. A good article in the Telegraph right before the wedding went through the finances. There is no way they made millions off that business.

      They need to be investigated for how they sneakily changed over their business model, knowing they were heavily in debt. How they took 500,000 in COVID funds when the business had been failing for years before then. And how they weren’t required to have their finances fully investigated before they racked up 2.4 million in debt to small businesses and never had to repay it.

  5. Hypocrisy says:

    For 300£ this man will lie about an interview he has never seen and one that hasn’t been released yet.. he has no credibility, character or integrity whatsoever it’s actually disgraceful that he is still allowed to publish articles. It’s absolutely disgusting that he still is on Willy’s payroll lying about the Sussex’s in every article he writes the words “pompous blowhard” always pop in my head when I see this man being interviewed.

  6. Elizabeth says:

    None of the Middletons has a head for business. How many failed businesses has James racked up in the past 15 years? Has anyone heard anything about his dog-food business lately? Carole raised her children to marry well, and that’s it.

  7. Dee(2) says:

    This guy just needs for Harry and Meghan to be failures. Anything he comments on is how it’s wrong, or bad, or puzzling or will cause concerns with the BRF. There’s no reality where Harry’s and Meghan and their level of success is comparable to Pippa. And it has nothing to do with being a ” spare” ( and that’s a hell of a way to describe someone’s other sibling).

    Pippa’s ventures sound like they are a mix of her thinking that people are going to have more interest in her ideas than they ever actually do, and them not being as wealthy as they like to pretend, but wanting to compete with the people she has been friends with through her and her sisters associations since their early teeny, and tax friendly ways to keep up their lifestyle.

  8. Eurydice says:

    Fitzwilliams seems pretty fixated on Pippa’s “figure-hugging” dress.

  9. Gloriana says:

    Pippa and her family don’t seem to be press hungry. We don’t see photos of her kids or hear a lot about them. Only that Pippa earned an actual degree focusing on early childhood. So why this hit piece? Is something coming out and they needed a distraction?

  10. Amy T says:

    I wish Jane Austen were alive to write the novel based on the Middleton family.

    {sighs}

    • mightymolly says:

      Here’s a start (yeah I used the GPT. Don’t judge, we’re just having fun here):

      In that pleasant and well-ordered part of Berkshire where the lanes are broad enough for courtesy, yet narrow enough for gossip, there stood a cheerful red-brick house belonging to the Middletons of Bucklebury Green. It was not an ancient estate, nor one distinguished by portraits of admirals and earls extending backward into impossible centuries; but it possessed the far rarer advantage of comfort honestly acquired, elegance sensibly maintained, and daughters who had been raised to believe themselves equal to any company in England, provided they behaved with composure in it.

    • mightymolly says:

      One more try, but this time I told it to emphasize Carol’s obsession with finding rich husbands:

      Mrs. Middleton, whose ambitions for her daughters exceeded even the elegance of her carefully arranged drawing room, regarded matrimony not as the happy consequence of affection but as the most profitable branch of domestic enterprise. She spoke of eligible gentlemen with the same brisk calculation another lady might reserve for the price of sugar, and no acquaintance possessing less than a handsome estate or ancient title could long retain her notice. Catherine, mild and composed, endured these maternal manoeuvres with admirable serenity, while her sister was perpetually directed toward dukes, financiers, and heirs as though presented upon a mercantile catalogue. Mrs. Middleton herself maintained the cheerful conviction that affection would inevitably follow income, and if a young man possessed both a respectable fortune and a tolerable profile, she considered the matter all but settled. Indeed, she pursued advantageous connections with such untiring vigilance that even the most determined matchmakers of Hertfordshire might have confessed themselves amateurs in her presence.

  11. Tessa says:

    Pippa is not a royal, so she cannot be a “spare.”

    • mightymolly says:

      Isn’t “spare” a concept throughout primogeniture? That only applies to people with hereditary land and titles, but the Middletons pretend that applies to them, and Pippa has always been treated as a “Spare” in terms of getting second tier treatment.

  12. Tessa says:

    Keen’s matron of honor outfit did not fit her right,

    • Penelope Cowell Doe says:

      But at least she had a fairly normal body!

      • BLACK ELDERBERRY says:

        @penelope..
        Not exactly with that figure; the butt was fake. As you can see, focusing on the butt is a family sport for the Middletons. Pippa had a artificial ass, and clearly, that “butt buzz” with Pippa was staged. Kate had already caught her aristocrat, now it was Pippa’s turn to try to make her a star and seduce Harry, which fizzled out before it even started, because Harry isn’t such an idiot like William so as not to know who Middleton is.

    • irisrose says:

      It is a weird knockoff of Wallis’s wedding dress, in the greige color that blue dress faded to through the years.

    • irisrose says:

      The wedding pic makes me think of a few more things

      – pip and her husband have the same face

      – Kate lied about taking care of the kids in the wedding party. Nanny Maria and another of their nannies were photographed taking care of the kids.

      – Kate grabbing hold of Charlotte by the shoulders, forcing her to turn around and look at the photographers outside the church.

      – Kate snarling at the kids and wagging her finger in their faces.

  13. Blujfly says:

    What a wild article. Who did Pippa piss off at the Mail? Her brother is 10 times an actual failure and gets glowing coverage because he sends free dog food to Richard Eden and leaks like a sieve. She must have refused.

    I’m not a huge fan of the Middletons or their children’s business acumen or work ethnic. But prior to the wedding Pippa was enjoying a perfect nice, fun life working 2-3 days/nights a week at a high end catering outfit, being a party goer and girl about town, doing the fitness stuff. Post-wedding the press stalked her constantly while her sister got to swam about under protection from the press. The opportunities she got, no doubt in large part because of her connections, she would have to suddenly sever in the middle once the Palace decided to get involved. In fact in 2016 there was a whole raft of reporting about how William “reined her in.” TL;DR this piece is mean spirited for no real reason and there’s absolutely no comparison to the Sussexes.

    • Becks1 says:

      oh there’s a reason for this being meanspirited, and its not about who Pippa pissed off – its about who her sister and BIL pissed off when C&C were in the US.

    • irisrose says:

      The Palace didn’t reign Pip in. She’s a flop. How to make ice cubes? Illegally getting RPOs for her book tour? Using Harry and Meghan to grift freebies for her wedding, then banning Meghan from the event?

      Just like her sister, she slept her way through The Set, but none would marry her. That’s how she ended up with Terribly Moderately, the untitled and unwealthy.

  14. Siri says:

    It’s amazing how whenever there is an article about anyone in the royal family or adjacent to the royal family, the conversation eventually turns to Harry and Meghan. The whole article could have been written without ever mentioning their names. Harry and Meghan have nothing to prove because the British press and royalists prove it for them, people are obsessed with them.

  15. Becks1 says:

    Ummm….you can’t compare Spare and Celebrate – I mean you can, but they are very different books in completely different genres, and one broke sales records and the other flopped. So maybe not the comparison that Pippa would want. Same with Meghan’s show. She wishes her book was the same kind of “failure” as WLM.

  16. Nerd says:

    I haven’t read the article but just based off of the headline, I will say that Pippa is just another talentless Middleton because none of the Middletons have accomplished anything. Laying on their backs doesn’t equate to accomplishing anything, so Kate is just as unaccomplished and talentless as the other Middletons. I at least hope that the others can at least spell, read and speak coherently.

  17. Pebbles says:

    My guess is that William has been funding most of the Middletons for years now. It might be one reason he doesn’t disclose his finances. I don’t think he’s taking care of Pippa and her family but definitely paid for the older Middletons home and expenses. I think he’ll be forced to give some job to poor James when he gets the throne. That guy is lost and i doubt his dog good business is doing that well. He has increasingly been offering himself up for news articles, Hello mag fraguares and tv morning show appearances still toting his dog along and rehashing how much the dogs saved him.

  18. QuiteContrary says:

    I don’t understand rich people math, or even terribly moderately wealthy people math, so I’m not going comment on the petting zoo losses.

    I just think this hit on Pippa is interesting because it ties in with the media hits on W&K. Camilla has been busy.

  19. BeanieBean says:

    Celebrate and Spare are in no way shape or form comparable. Well, OK, they’re both books, but that’s about it. 🙄 Geez Louise this guy is reaching.

  20. Amy Bee says:

    Richard Fitzwilliams behaves like Pippa’s a royal.

  21. First comment says:

    “There are echoes here of Harry, whose ill-advised memoir Spare made all too clear that the supposedly inseparable brothers were far from being close.” Did you notice this? Does Fitzwilliam imply that the two sisters are far from close as the media suggests just like William and Harry?

  22. wolfmamma says:

    All dodgy, complicit and truly morally bankrupt. May I present the Middletons

  23. Sms says:

    Being adjacent to a royal married in and all the media attention it brings must be super stressful. Both Queen Maxima and Queen Letizia lost sisters to suicide after their marriages. They must wonder who much their choices influenced their siblings lives. Maxima’s sister was only 33 and Letizia’s was 31 and a mother.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment