Donald Trump is still ranting about how Prince Harry & Meghan treated QEII

A few weeks ago, we covered an early excerpt from Susan Page’s The Queen and Her Presidents: The Hidden Hand That Shaped History. Page is an American journalist, and she was able to interview former presidents about their conversations and dealings with Queen Elizabeth II. In an early excerpt, Page spoke to a palace aide who (bizarrely) swore that QEII saw then-Meghan Markle as “calculated.” Page wrote: “Her Majesty had become wary of Meghan as an opportunist — was ‘on to her from the start,’ the aide said — and one with public relations skills that left the palace’s outdated press operation in the dust.” Well, would you like more excerpts from this book? Page asked Donald Trump about how QEII felt about Prince Harry and Meghan as well. Meanwhile, Barack Obama spoke about his conversation with the queen about Brexit in 2016.

Donald Trump has reopened his war with the Sussexes after saying that the late Queen Elizabeth II was left deeply wounded by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s public attacks on the monarchy, revealing that he repeatedly pressed her on the subject, only to be met with her legendary diplomatic composure.

“I asked her about it constantly,” Trump told the journalist Susan Page. “I’d say, ‘Come on, tell me.’ ‘No, no. It’s very nice.’ Everybody was nice. She liked everybody.”

But the president said he saw through the deflection. “I couldn’t get her to say it. I’m good at that, too,” he said. “She would always say, ‘No, no, would be lovely, lovely.’ But it wasn’t lovely, and I think it hurt her. I really think it hurt her. It was tremendous dissension, and I just don’t think they treated her with the respect that she should have, frankly.”

On the Sussexes, Trump told Page he admired the Queen’s restraint but said he could never have shown the same grace. “I actually told her I couldn’t do what she does, because she was very cool on the subject. She would talk about it but never said anything bad about either of them, and I think she loved Harry, really loved Harry. But Harry’s been, I feel, led astray. I really do. I think he’s been terribly led astray…. It’s just so disrespectful the way that happened, and she didn’t deserve that. This is a woman that everybody respected so much. I think she was stunned by what was happening, actually. She couldn’t believe it in real time.”

Trump also reveals, for the first time, that the Queen personally intervened after the 2019 leak of cables from the British ambassador Kim Darroch, in which the diplomat described Trump as someone who “radiates insecurity” and leads a dysfunctional administration. According to the book, the Queen reached out to calm troubled waters. Trump told Page that the Queen was appalled by Darroch’s comments. “She couldn’t believe it; she thought he was terrible,” he said. “She said, ‘He doesn’t speak for our government.’ Oh, she was furious over that.”

For British people, I suspect the most significant revelation in the book will be new details on the Queen’s private views on Brexit, a subject that was the source of endless speculation during her reign. According to Page, the Queen shared her real views with Obama during a private lunch on April 22, 2016, the day after her 90th birthday, at a time when the referendum debate was reaching fever pitch.

The Queen was not only wary of Brexit, Page reveals, but was dismayed by how David Cameron handled it. Obama told Page that the Queen had effectively questioned why a prime minister who understood politics would put forward a public referendum on a matter of such importance when he did not know what the answer would be. Obama said he was surprised by her candor and that it was the only time she commented directly on British politics to him.

[From The Royalist Substack]

So by Trump’s own admission, QEII never said one bad word about Harry and Meghan to him, yet he projected all of this sh-t about how he thought she felt. Since he hates Meghan, he believed that QEII hated Meghan and blamed her for everything. And the Tories used the Queen to run interference with Trump and help soothe his little salty-baby ego too. What Obama said is interesting though, and note how Obama’s comments are actually about politics and political maneuvering, while Trump’s comments are basically just “I begged her for royal gossip and she was tasked with soothing my diaper rash.”

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

24 Responses to “Donald Trump is still ranting about how Prince Harry & Meghan treated QEII”

  1. 1stTimer says:

    Well, the orange turd always knows what women think and want, it does not matter what they say. Despicable unhuman being.

    • Kitten says:

      Remember when that Danish lawmaker (in reference to Greenland) said the Trump administration has a “rapist mentality.”? They do not understand nor do they care about consent.

  2. lady digby says:

    I don’t believe Harry’s grandmother trashed Harry and Meg to anyone. She certainly wouldn’t have said anything about her grandson to someone as horrible and indiscreet as Trump.

    • sunniside up says:

      Exactly, but who in their right mind would believe Trump

    • 1stTimer says:

      He confirmed that, but believes he knows better

    • Becks1 says:

      she definitely didn’t but he says he asked her about it “constantly.” I’m sure that’s an exaggeration, especially since they didn’t leave the Firm until early 2020, and Oprah was in 2021 (after Trump was out of office), and she was dead for the docuseries and Spare. Who knows if he even asked her about it more than once.

      But its clear she knew who she was dealing with and didn’t give him one iota of reaction to use against the Sussexes.

  3. Brit says:

    Nothing about Andrew and the 12 million dollar because of his association with two human trafficking predators. The desperation, lol. So they got Megyn Kelly to speak out, polls came out this morning and the trolls and press are furious and coping. People have seen the monarchy for what it is and it’s almost pathetic desperation to continue to attack this couple with a looney tune President, irrelevant commentators, middle aged trolls and broke reporters.

  4. Brassy Rebel says:

    Shame on Susan Page for normalizing this monster. She could have just interviewed our former living presidents who are sane, not certifiable. And Trump expressing his sympathy for Elizabeth because, according to him, she was made to feel bad is not credible. He doesn’t empathize with people who are hurt. He just hurts them more. The whole thing is bonkers except for Obama revealing how politically sophisticated she was. That I can believe. However, obviously the political canniness ended when family was involved. That’s how Andrew became such a damn train 🚂 wreck.

  5. YankeeDoodles says:

    That is fascinating about Cameron and as usual her political instincts were 100% more on point than her prime minister’s. Face palm.

    • Jais says:

      It really is fascinating. Pity Cameron didn’t see it that way. Ugh, and what a difference bw Obama and Trump. What shambles we are in now.

    • sunniside up says:

      Unfortunately Cameron over estimated the intelligence of the average voter, we are now all paying the price.

  6. SuOutdoors says:

    Says the guy who made the Queen wait for him in the glaring summer sun – for nearly 20 minutes! And when walked two steps in front of her! Respect is his second given name…

  7. MsIam says:

    Ok Dr. Jesus. Whatever you say. Oink oink!

  8. Mirandat says:

    I remember reading that the Obamas were the favorite First Couple of both QEII and Prince Philip, to the point that they wanted to arrange for them to visit even AFTER he left office. With that in mind, this definitely seems like yet another attempt by Trump to one-up Obama by pretending to be closer to the Queen. Thankfully, most people realize that Trump is a lying liar who lies. Unfortunately for him, we watchers remember the rumors that the royal family were fighting amongst themselves over who was going to be stuck with him during his first state visit (didn’t it end up being poor Harry?).

    • Dee(2) says:

      I will always remember Anne by the door at an event, and the queen turning to look at her like would you come on in the room , and Anne shrugging like, you know I don’t want to be here.

      I don’t think Harry had to deal with him, because Meghan was postpartum and the media complained that she didn’t come to the state dinner even though or she was like a month old.

  9. Amy Bee says:

    Anybody who still says the Queen didn’t meddle in politics is either deluded or a liar. As for the Harry and Meghan stuff, I can believe she didn’t bad mouth them with Trump. If she had he would have said so and all the rest is him regurgitating tabloid nonsense.

    • Where'sMyTiara says:

      Reminds me of that year she opened Parliament not wearing a tiara but a blue dress, and a blue hat with yellow flowers that looked suspiciously like the European Union flag.

      She did brooch warfare/tiara warfare for years. The idea that Drumpf got any goss from Lizzie goes against the fact that during his state visit she wore the Burmese ruby tiara. The rubies were a gift from Burma and were intended as a protective against evil. Wearing that tiara, which hadn’t seen daylight for years, summed up everything she had to say about Diaper Donnie.

  10. maisie says:

    I always thought Page was a decent journo, but apparently she’s willing to throw another woman under the bus to try and sell a few copies of her book. NICE

  11. Gabby says:

    Well, here’s hoping that Trump can join QE2 where she is real soon

  12. Kathalea says:

    The Dutch king and queen went to the US, slept in the WH and had dinner with the orange thing and his wife, eating spinach soup with scallops, and North sea sole, with leek and asparagus. They ate cake for desert.

    Just putting it out there just case one thinks about praising the Dutch royals, for being so unproblematic

    • Becks1 says:

      yeah those optics weren’t great either. I’m not sure what I expect royals to do – refuse to go? What kind of political crisis would that cause? I’m also sure a lot of these people find him grotesque personally but don’t loathe his policies the way we do on here.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment